Patel Integrated Logistics Ltd

Patel Integrated's historical performance from March 2017 to March 2018 showed a decline in net sales and total operating income, while profit after tax improved slightly. Despite some positive trends in profitability, concerns about operational efficiency arose due to decreased cash flow and increased liabilities.

On 25-Nov, Patel Integrated Logistics Ltd witnessed a notable rise in its share price, climbing 4.11% to ₹14.69 by 08:46 PM. This upward movement reflects a short-term positive momentum despite the stock's challenging longer-term performance relative to the broader market.

As of November 12, 2025, Patel Integrated is considered undervalued with a PE Ratio of 12.42, a Price to Book Value of 0.81, and an EV to EBITDA of 9.22, indicating a favorable valuation compared to peers like Container Corporation and Aegis Logistics, despite recent stock performance lagging behind the Sensex.

Patel Integrated's historical performance from March 2017 to March 2018 showed a decline in net sales and cash flow, with net sales falling to 423.68 Cr and cash flow from operations decreasing to 5.00 Cr. However, profit before tax and profit after tax improved slightly, indicating mixed financial results.

Patel Integrated Logistics reported strong Q2 FY26 results with a 20.75% increase in net sales and a 39.02% rise in net profit, indicating improved operational performance. However, the company faces long-term challenges, including weak return ratios and stock underperformance, raising concerns about the sustainability of these gains.

As of November 10, 2025, Patel Integrated's valuation has shifted from attractive to fair, with a PE Ratio of 12.49 and an EV to EBITDA of 9.13, indicating reasonable valuation compared to peers like Container Corporation and Aegis Logistics, despite a 43.09% stock decline over the past year.

As of 10-Nov, Patel Integrated Logistics Ltd's stock price is declining at 13.83, down 0.36%, and has lost value for six consecutive days. The stock is underperforming significantly compared to the market, with a year-to-date decline of 35.43% against the Sensex's gain of 6.91%.

As of October 1, 2025, Patel Integrated is considered undervalued with an attractive valuation grade, featuring a PE Ratio of 12.93 and an EV to EBITDA of 9.53, making it a compelling investment compared to peers like Container Corporation and Delhivery, despite a year-to-date stock decline of 33.15%.

As of October 1, 2025, Patel Integrated is considered an attractive investment due to its undervalued metrics, including a PE ratio of 12.93 and a PEG ratio of 0.62, despite recent underperformance against the Sensex.

As of 15-Sep, Patel Integrated Logistics Ltd is priced at 14.60, with no change and a year-to-date decline of 31.84%. The stock has underperformed its sector and the broader market, indicating weak investor interest and declining participation.

As of 12-Sep, Patel Integrated Logistics Ltd is priced at 14.60, with a year-to-date decline of -31.84% and poor performance compared to the Sensex. The stock shows a downward trend, declining investor interest, and challenges in growth, despite a low debt-to-equity ratio and increased profits.

As of 11-Sep, Patel Integrated Logistics Ltd is priced at 14.60, down 0.95%, and has significantly underperformed its sector and the Sensex. Despite a low debt-to-equity ratio indicating financial stability, the stock's year-to-date decline of 31.84% and declining investor interest reflect poor performance and growth prospects.

As of 09-Sep, Patel Integrated Logistics Ltd is facing a significant decline in its stock price, currently at 14.30, with a year-to-date drop of 33.24% and a 4.28% decline over the last four days. The company's poor long-term growth and reduced investor participation have contributed to its underperformance compared to the broader market.

Patel Integrated's historical performance shows a slight decline in net sales and operating income from March 2017 to March 2018, though profit after tax increased. While shareholder equity grew, the company faced challenges with cash flow and liquidity, ending with negative cash and cash equivalents.