Amrapali Industries Q3 FY26: Explosive Profit Growth Masks Fundamental Concerns

Feb 14 2026 08:51 AM IST
share
Share Via
Amrapali Industries Ltd., a micro-cap stock and commodity brokerage firm with a market capitalisation of ₹76.00 crores, reported a dramatic surge in net profit for Q3 FY26, posting ₹3.06 crores compared to ₹0.37 crores in the previous quarter—a staggering 727.03% quarter-on-quarter jump. Year-on-year, the company delivered an even more impressive 1033.33% growth over Q3 FY25's ₹0.27 crores. However, the stock has struggled to translate these earnings into market confidence, trading at ₹14.48 as of February 13, 2026, down 10.95% over the past year and languishing 28.46% below its 52-week high of ₹20.24.
Amrapali Industries Q3 FY26: Explosive Profit Growth Masks Fundamental Concerns
Net Profit (Q3 FY26)
₹3.06 Cr
▲ 727.03% QoQ
YoY Growth
1033.33%
▲ vs Q3 FY25
Return on Equity
3.83%
Below Average
Debt to Equity
4.40x
High Leverage

The company's Q3 FY26 performance marks the highest quarterly net profit in recent history, driven by robust revenue growth and improved operational efficiency. Net sales surged 40.24% quarter-on-quarter to ₹15,002.88 crores, whilst year-on-year growth stood at 30.77%. Operating profit before depreciation, interest, and tax (PBDIT) excluding other income reached ₹4.83 crores, the highest in the trailing quarters. Yet beneath this surface-level strength lies a troubling reality: razor-thin margins, elevated leverage, and weak capital efficiency that have kept institutional investors at bay and technical indicators firmly in bearish territory.

The stock's technical trend turned bearish on December 24, 2025, at ₹15.18, and has since failed to reclaim key moving averages. Trading below its 5-day, 20-day, 50-day, 100-day, and 200-day moving averages, Amrapali Industries faces significant overhead resistance. With a proprietary Mojo Score of just 34 out of 100 and a "SELL" rating, the investment thesis remains challenged despite the headline-grabbing quarterly numbers.

Financial Performance: Revenue Surge, Margin Compression Persists

Amrapali Industries' Q3 FY26 results reveal a company experiencing significant top-line momentum but struggling with profitability at scale. Net sales of ₹15,002.88 crores represent a 40.24% sequential increase from Q2 FY26's ₹10,698.34 crores and a 30.77% year-on-year jump from Q3 FY25's ₹11,473.05 crores. This marks the highest quarterly revenue in the company's recent history, reflecting robust trading volumes in its stock and commodity brokerage operations.

Quarter Net Sales (₹ Cr) QoQ Growth Net Profit (₹ Cr) QoQ Growth PAT Margin
Dec'25 15,002.88 +40.24% 3.06 +727.03% 0.02%
Sep'25 10,698.34 +127.55% 0.37 +2.78% 0.00%
Jun'25 4,701.49 +44.52% 0.36 -64.00% 0.01%
Mar'25 3,253.09 -71.65% 1.00 +270.37% 0.03%
Dec'24 11,473.05 +42.85% 0.27 +170.00% 0.00%
Sep'24 8,031.28 +175.01% 0.10 -60.00% 0.00%
Jun'24 2,920.32 0.25 0.01%

However, the company's profitability metrics remain alarmingly weak. The PAT margin for Q3 FY26 stood at just 0.02%, whilst the operating margin excluding other income was a meagre 0.03%. These paper-thin margins highlight the capital-intensive, low-margin nature of the trading and distribution business model. Operating profit (PBDIT) excluding other income reached ₹4.83 crores in Q3 FY26, up from ₹2.09 crores in Q2 FY26, but this improvement was partially offset by interest costs of ₹1.62 crores and depreciation of ₹0.40 crores.

A concerning aspect of the quarter's performance was the contribution of other income to profitability. Other income of ₹1.78 crores represented 38.78% of profit before tax (PBT) of ₹4.59 crores, raising questions about the sustainability of core operating performance. The tax rate for Q3 FY26 normalised to 33.33%, up from 30.19% in the previous quarter, resulting in a tax outgo of ₹1.53 crores.

Revenue (Q3 FY26)
₹15,002.88 Cr
▲ 40.24% QoQ | ▲ 30.77% YoY
Net Profit (Q3 FY26)
₹3.06 Cr
▲ 727.03% QoQ | ▲ 1033.33% YoY
Operating Margin (Excl OI)
0.03%
Stable QoQ
PAT Margin
0.02%
Ultra-thin profitability

On an annual basis, FY25 saw net sales of ₹25,677.00 crores, down 5.90% from FY24's ₹27,300.00 crores. Annual net profit for FY25 stood at ₹1.00 crore, a modest improvement from near-zero profitability in FY24. The full-year operating margin remained at 0.00%, underscoring the persistent challenge of converting high-volume trading activity into meaningful bottom-line returns.

Capital Efficiency Crisis: Weak ROE and High Leverage

Amrapali Industries' fundamental weakness becomes starkly apparent when examining its capital efficiency metrics. The company's average return on equity (ROE) stands at just 3.83%, far below industry standards and peer averages. This means that for every rupee of shareholder equity deployed, the company generates less than four paise of annual profit—a dismal return that fails to compensate investors for the risk undertaken. The latest ROE of 5.95% shows marginal improvement but remains in the "weak" category by any measure.

⚠️ Critical Capital Efficiency Concerns

Return on Equity (Average): 3.83% – Significantly below acceptable thresholds. Higher ROE indicates better capital efficiency; Amrapali's low ROE signals poor profitability relative to shareholder equity.

Return on Capital Employed (Average): 1.54% – Indicates minimal returns on total capital deployed in the business.

Debt to Equity Ratio (Average): 4.40x – Extremely high financial leverage amplifies both returns and risks.

The company's return on capital employed (ROCE) averages a paltry 1.54%, with the latest figure at 1.77%. This metric, which measures how efficiently a company generates profits from its capital base, reveals that Amrapali Industries struggles to create value from the resources at its disposal. The combination of weak ROE and ROCE points to fundamental business model challenges that cannot be easily resolved through operational tweaks alone.

Compounding these profitability concerns is the company's precarious leverage position. With an average debt-to-equity ratio of 4.40 times, Amrapali Industries operates with significant financial risk. The debt-to-EBITDA ratio averages 25.91, indicating that it would take nearly 26 years of current EBITDA generation to pay off existing debt—an untenable situation. The average EBIT-to-interest coverage ratio of just 0.37 times means the company's operating profit cannot even cover its interest obligations, raising serious questions about debt serviceability.

The balance sheet as of March 2025 shows shareholder funds of ₹33.02 crores against current liabilities of ₹84.08 crores. Whilst the company carries no long-term debt on the books, the high current liabilities relative to equity underscore working capital pressures inherent in the trading business. Fixed assets stood at ₹21.50 crores, down from ₹23.11 crores in the previous year, whilst current assets of ₹94.65 crores provide some liquidity cushion.

Quality Assessment: Below Average with Structural Headwinds

Amrapali Industries carries a "Below Average" quality grade based on long-term financial performance, a designation it has held since November 2025. The company's quality score reflects a mixed picture: healthy long-term sales growth of 15.82% over five years, but negative EBIT growth of -21.03% over the same period. This divergence between revenue expansion and profitability contraction highlights the company's inability to translate scale into sustainable earnings power.

Quality Scorecard Breakdown

5-Year Sales CAGR: 15.82% ✓ – Demonstrates consistent revenue growth trajectory

5-Year EBIT CAGR: -21.03% ✗ – Profitability declining despite revenue growth

Average EBIT to Interest: 0.37x ✗ – Operating profit insufficient to cover interest costs

Promoter Pledging: 0.00% ✓ – No pledged shares indicates promoter confidence

Institutional Holdings: 0.00% ✗ – Complete absence of FII, mutual fund, and insurance participation

One positive aspect of the quality assessment is the complete absence of promoter pledging. Promoter holding stands stable at 73.43% across the last five quarters with zero pledged shares, suggesting that the promoter group—led by Yashwant Amratlal Thakkar with a 50.34% stake—maintains confidence in the business despite operational challenges. However, the flip side is the total absence of institutional investor interest. FII, mutual fund, insurance, and other DII holdings all stand at 0.00%, indicating that sophisticated investors have steered clear of this micro-cap stock.

The company's average sales-to-capital-employed ratio of 243.59 times appears impressive on the surface, reflecting the asset-light nature of the trading business. However, this metric must be viewed in context with the abysmal ROCE and ROE figures, which reveal that high asset turnover does not translate into acceptable returns for shareholders.

Peer Comparison: Valuation Premium Without Quality Justification

When benchmarked against peers in the trading and distributors sector, Amrapali Industries presents a puzzling valuation picture. The company trades at a P/E ratio of 37.04 times trailing twelve-month earnings, below the peer group average but still elevated given its weak fundamentals. The price-to-book ratio of 2.21 times suggests the market values the company at more than double its net asset value, despite the poor return on equity.

Company P/E (TTM) ROE (%) Debt/Equity Price/Book
Amrapali Industries 37.04 3.83% 4.40 2.21
Gautam Exim 681.85 4.29% 0.05 6.65
Remedium Life 37.68 0.00% 10.33 0.76
Constronics 17.07 20.02% -0.17 1.94
Genpharmasec NA (Loss Making) 1.03% 0.09 1.12
Bombay Cycle 40.22 9.34% -0.36 2.57

The peer comparison reveals that Amrapali Industries ranks poorly on quality metrics. Its ROE of 3.83% trails peers like Constronics (20.02%) and Bombay Cycle (9.34%) by wide margins. Only Remedium Life, with 0.00% ROE, and Genpharmasec at 1.03% fare worse. The company's debt-to-equity ratio of 4.40 is the highest in the peer group excluding Remedium Life's extreme 10.33 ratio, highlighting the elevated financial risk profile.

Despite these quality deficiencies, Amrapali Industries commands a P/E multiple comparable to better-performing peers. This valuation disconnect suggests either market inefficiency or expectations of dramatic improvement that have yet to materialise. With a market capitalisation of just ₹76.00 crores, the stock ranks third in the peer group, indicating limited institutional appetite for this micro-cap name.

Valuation Analysis: Expensive Despite Fundamental Weakness

The current valuation assessment for Amrapali Industries is categorised as "EXPENSIVE," a grade it has held with brief interruptions since September 2025. This designation appears counterintuitive given the company's weak fundamentals, but reflects the elevated multiples relative to earnings quality and growth prospects.

P/E Ratio (TTM)
37.04x
vs Industry 26x
Price to Book
2.21x
Premium to NAV
EV/EBITDA
43.90x
Elevated multiple
PEG Ratio
0.14x
Growth-adjusted

At a P/E ratio of 37.04 times, Amrapali Industries trades at a 42% premium to the industry average of 26 times. This premium lacks justification when considering the company's sub-4% ROE, high leverage, and deteriorating profitability trends. The EV/EBITDA multiple of 43.90 times and EV/EBIT ratio of 69.04 times further underscore the stretched valuation, particularly when juxtaposed against the weak EBIT-to-interest coverage.

The PEG ratio of 0.14 suggests the stock might be undervalued relative to growth, but this metric can be misleading for companies with erratic earnings patterns. The dramatic quarter-on-quarter profit swings—from ₹0.37 crores in Q2 FY26 to ₹3.06 crores in Q3 FY26—reflect the volatile nature of the trading business rather than sustainable growth momentum.

The stock currently trades at ₹14.48, down 28.46% from its 52-week high of ₹20.24 but up 14.47% from its 52-week low of ₹12.65. This positioning in the lower half of the annual range provides limited comfort given the bearish technical setup and negative price momentum across multiple timeframes.

Shareholding Pattern: Stable Promoter, Absent Institutions

The shareholding pattern for Amrapali Industries has remained remarkably static over the past five quarters, reflecting both stability and stagnation. Promoter holding stands unchanged at 73.43% from December 2024 through December 2025, with no sequential changes across any quarter. This stability indicates promoter commitment but also suggests limited liquidity and free float for trading.

Quarter Promoter FII Mutual Funds Insurance Other DII Non-Institutional
Dec'25 73.43% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 26.57%
Sep'25 73.43% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 26.57%
Jun'25 73.43% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 26.57%
Mar'25 73.43% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 26.57%
Dec'24 73.43% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 26.57%

The complete absence of institutional participation—zero holdings by foreign institutional investors, mutual funds, insurance companies, and other domestic institutional investors—represents a significant red flag. Institutional investors typically conduct rigorous due diligence and avoid companies with weak governance, poor capital efficiency, or unsustainable business models. The 0.00% institutional holding across all categories signals that sophisticated market participants have found Amrapali Industries unworthy of capital allocation.

The non-institutional shareholding of 26.57% comprises retail investors and other non-classified holders. This category has also remained static, suggesting limited trading interest and poor liquidity. The absence of any sequential changes in shareholding pattern over five consecutive quarters indicates a frozen shareholder base with minimal buying or selling activity.

Stock Performance: Consistent Underperformance Across Timeframes

Amrapali Industries' stock price performance tells a story of persistent underperformance against the broader market. Over the past year, the stock has declined 10.95% whilst the Sensex gained 8.52%, resulting in a negative alpha of -19.47 percentage points. This underperformance extends across multiple timeframes, reflecting sustained investor scepticism.

Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week +3.43% -1.14% +4.57%
3 Months -7.48% -2.19% -5.29%
6 Months -7.65% +2.59% -10.24%
YTD +0.91% -3.04% +3.95%
1 Year -10.95% +8.52% -19.47%
2 Years -8.01% +15.47% -23.48%
3 Years +9.37% +36.73% -27.36%
5 Years +276.10% +60.30% +215.80%

The one-week performance of +3.43% against the Sensex's -1.14% decline provides a rare bright spot, generating positive alpha of +4.57 percentage points. However, this short-term bounce appears technical in nature rather than driven by fundamental re-rating. The three-month return of -7.48% and six-month return of -7.65% demonstrate the prevailing negative momentum.

Relative to its sector, Amrapali Industries has marginally outperformed the Trading & Distributors index, which declined 12.97% over the past year. This 2.02 percentage point outperformance offers little consolation given the absolute negative returns and underperformance versus the broader market.

The stock's risk-adjusted return of -0.25 over the past year, combined with high volatility of 43.85%, places it in the "HIGH RISK LOW RETURN" category. With a beta of 1.50, the stock exhibits 50% higher volatility than the market, amplifying both upside and downside movements. The negative Sharpe ratio indicates that investors are not being compensated for the elevated risk undertaken.

"With a beta of 1.50 and volatility of 43.85%, Amrapali Industries delivers high risk without commensurate returns—a toxic combination for risk-conscious investors."

Technical Analysis: Entrenched Bearish Trend

The technical picture for Amrapali Industries remains firmly bearish across multiple indicators and timeframes. The stock entered a bearish trend on December 24, 2025, at ₹15.18, transitioning from a mildly bearish phase. Since then, it has failed to mount any sustainable recovery, trading below all key moving averages.

At the current price of ₹14.48, the stock sits below its 5-day moving average of ₹14.41, 20-day MA of ₹14.08, 50-day MA of ₹14.48, 100-day MA of ₹14.97, and 200-day MA of ₹15.44. This alignment of moving averages in descending order creates significant overhead resistance, making any upward breakout challenging without substantial fundamental catalysts.

Both weekly and monthly MACD indicators flash bearish signals, whilst the KST (Know Sure Thing) momentum oscillator confirms the negative trend on both timeframes. Bollinger Bands show mildly bearish signals, indicating the stock is trading in the lower half of its recent range without significant downside momentum acceleration. The RSI shows no clear signal, suggesting neither oversold nor overbought conditions.

Immediate support lies at the 52-week low of ₹12.65, representing 12.64% downside from current levels. On the upside, immediate resistance clusters around the 20-day MA at ₹14.08, followed by the 100-day MA at ₹14.97 and 200-day MA at ₹15.44. The 52-week high of ₹20.24 represents distant resistance, requiring a 39.78% rally to reclaim those levels.

Investment Thesis: Mojo Score of 34 Reflects Multiple Red Flags

The proprietary Mojo Score of 34 out of 100 places Amrapali Industries firmly in "SELL" territory, with the recommendation to consider selling and look for exit opportunities. This score reflects a comprehensive assessment across four key dimensions: valuation, quality, financial trend, and technical trend.

Valuation
Expensive
Elevated multiples
Quality Grade
Below Average
Weak fundamentals
Financial Trend
Positive
Q3 FY26 strength
Technical Trend
Bearish
Below all MAs

The score breakdown reveals a company with mixed signals but predominantly negative characteristics. The financial trend component scores positively based on Q3 FY26's record revenue and profit, with net sales, PBDIT, PBT, and PAT all reaching multi-quarter highs. However, this lone positive is overwhelmed by concerns across valuation, quality, and technical dimensions.

The valuation component flags the stock as expensive despite weak fundamentals, with elevated P/E and EV/EBITDA multiples that cannot be justified by the poor ROE and ROCE. The quality grade of "Below Average" reflects high debt, weak profitability, negative EBIT growth, and zero institutional participation. The technical trend remains bearish, with the stock trapped below all moving averages and multiple indicators flashing sell signals.

Key strengths supporting the score include the absence of promoter pledging and some positive momentum in recent quarterly results. However, these are vastly outweighed by concerns: high debt with weak fundamental strength, consistent underperformance against benchmarks over three years, bearish technical setup, and a debt-to-equity ratio of 4.40 times that amplifies financial risk.

Key Strengths & Risk Factors

KEY STRENGTHS

  • Revenue Growth Momentum: Q3 FY26 net sales of ₹15,002.88 crores represent highest quarterly revenue, with 40.24% QoQ and 30.77% YoY growth
  • Profit Surge: Net profit of ₹3.06 crores in Q3 FY26 marks 727.03% QoQ and 1033.33% YoY growth, demonstrating operational leverage
  • No Promoter Pledging: Zero pledged shares across 73.43% promoter holding indicates management confidence
  • Stable Shareholding: Promoter holding unchanged at 73.43% over five quarters reflects commitment
  • Long-term Sales Growth: Five-year sales CAGR of 15.82% demonstrates consistent top-line expansion
  • Positive Financial Trend: Current quarter shows highest levels across key metrics (sales, PBDIT, PBT, PAT)

KEY CONCERNS

  • Extremely Weak ROE: Average ROE of 3.83% indicates poor capital efficiency and inadequate shareholder returns
  • High Leverage: Debt-to-equity ratio of 4.40x and debt-to-EBITDA of 25.91 create significant financial risk
  • Insufficient Interest Coverage: EBIT-to-interest ratio of 0.37x means operating profit cannot cover interest costs
  • Razor-thin Margins: PAT margin of 0.02% and operating margin of 0.03% leave no room for error
  • Zero Institutional Participation: Complete absence of FII, mutual fund, and insurance holdings signals quality concerns
  • Bearish Technical Setup: Stock trading below all moving averages with negative momentum across timeframes
  • Consistent Underperformance: Negative alpha of -19.47% over one year and -27.36% over three years versus Sensex

Outlook: What to Watch

POSITIVE CATALYSTS

  • Sustained Revenue Growth: Continuation of 30-40% YoY sales growth would indicate market share gains
  • Margin Expansion: Operating margins moving above 0.10% would signal improved pricing power or cost efficiency
  • Debt Reduction: Lowering debt-to-equity below 3.0x would reduce financial risk and improve credit profile
  • Institutional Entry: Any mutual fund or FII stake would validate quality improvement
  • Technical Breakout: Sustained move above ₹15.44 (200-day MA) could trigger momentum buying

RED FLAGS TO MONITOR

  • Margin Compression: PAT margins falling below 0.01% would indicate deteriorating profitability
  • Interest Coverage Decline: EBIT-to-interest ratio dropping below 0.30x would signal debt servicing stress
  • Revenue Volatility: Sequential quarterly revenue swings exceeding 50% suggest business instability
  • Promoter Selling: Any reduction in 73.43% promoter stake would be a major negative signal
  • Technical Breakdown: Break below ₹12.65 (52-week low) could trigger capitulation selling

The Verdict: Sell on Fundamental Weakness Despite Quarterly Pop

SELL

Score: 34/100

For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiation. The combination of weak ROE (3.83%), high leverage (4.40x debt-to-equity), razor-thin margins (0.02% PAT margin), and zero institutional participation creates an unfavourable risk-reward profile. The Q3 FY26 profit surge appears unsustainable given structural profitability challenges.

For Existing Holders: Consider exiting on any technical bounce towards ₹15-16 levels. The bearish technical setup, consistent underperformance (-19.47% alpha over one year), and expensive valuation (37x P/E despite weak fundamentals) suggest limited upside potential. Use any strength to reduce exposure.

Fair Value Estimate: ₹11-12 (24-31% downside from current ₹14.48), based on normalised earnings and peer multiples adjusted for quality deficit. Current valuation fails to reflect elevated financial risk and poor capital efficiency.

Note— ROCE = (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)

⚠️ Investment Disclaimer

This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News