Are ICRA latest results good or bad?
ICRA's latest Q2 FY26 results are generally positive, with a 30.20% year-on-year net profit growth and improved operating margins, but concerns about modest topline growth and market valuation persist. Overall, the company demonstrates strong profitability and financial stability, though challenges in achieving higher growth rates remain.
ICRA's latest financial results for Q2 FY26 reflect a company effectively navigating a challenging growth environment while demonstrating operational efficiency. The consolidated net profit for the quarter reached ₹47.81 crores, marking a notable year-on-year growth of 30.20% and a sequential increase of 12.65%. This performance is complemented by a revenue growth of 8.29% year-on-year, with net sales amounting to ₹136.58 crores, which also represents a 9.71% improvement from the previous quarter.A key highlight from the results is the significant expansion in operating margins, which improved to 35.54% from 32.71% in the same quarter last year, driven by disciplined cost management and operational efficiencies. The profit after tax (PAT) margin also saw an enhancement, rising to 35.16% compared to 29.42% in Q2 FY25.
Despite these positive indicators, ICRA's topline growth remains a point of concern, with a five-year sales compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of just 10.11%. This modest growth trajectory raises questions about the sustainability of the company's current market valuation, especially given the competitive landscape in the credit rating industry.
The company's financial position remains robust, characterized by a net cash status and a negligible debt level, which provides it with exceptional financial flexibility. However, the return on equity (ROE) at 16.14% indicates moderate capital efficiency relative to its peers, suggesting an area for potential improvement.
Overall, ICRA's recent performance showcases strong profitability and operational capabilities, yet the modest growth rates and premium valuation present a complex investment scenario. The company saw an adjustment in its evaluation, reflecting the interplay between its solid fundamentals and the challenges it faces in achieving higher growth rates.
{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)
{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)
Related Stock Links
- {{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Analysis
- {{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Technicals
- {{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Quality
- {{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Valuation
- {{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Financial Trend
- {{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Return Analysis
- {{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Price Analysis
- {{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Quarterly Result Analysis
- {{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Half-Yearly Result Analysis
- {{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Nine Monthly Result Analysis
- {{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Annual Results
- {{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Balance Sheet
- {{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Profit & Loss
- {{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Cash Flow
- {{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} News
- {{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Announcements
- {{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Share Holding
- {{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Peer Comparison
Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }}
({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
₹{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News
Most Read
