Are Max Healthcare Institute Ltd latest results good or bad?

Feb 06 2026 07:30 PM IST
share
Share Via
Max Healthcare Institute Ltd's latest Q3 FY26 results show a mixed performance, with a 26.01% year-on-year profit growth to ₹300.92 crores but a 38.75% sequential decline. Revenue increased 10.66% year-on-year to ₹2,067.52 crores, yet there are concerns about rising costs and declining margins, alongside mixed institutional investor sentiment.
Max Healthcare Institute Ltd's latest financial results for Q3 FY26 present a mixed picture. The company reported a net profit of ₹300.92 crores, reflecting a year-on-year growth of 26.01%, but a significant sequential decline of 38.75% compared to the previous quarter. This decline was influenced by a normalization of tax expenses, as the previous quarter had benefitted from an unusual tax credit that inflated profits.
Revenue for the quarter stood at ₹2,067.52 crores, showing a year-on-year increase of 10.66%. However, it experienced a sequential decrease of 3.18% from the prior quarter, raising questions about demand momentum. Over the nine-month period from April to December 2025, the company achieved a robust revenue growth of 21.72%, indicating its ability to capture increasing healthcare demand in urban India. Operating margins (excluding other income) decreased to 26.04%, down 89 basis points from the previous quarter, while the profit after tax margin fell to 14.55%, a drop of 846 basis points sequentially. These margin compressions are attributed to rising employee costs and the seasonal revenue dip, although the company has maintained stable operating margins in the 26-27% range over the past year. Max Healthcare's financial leverage has also increased, with a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.33 times, the highest in recent years, as the company continues to invest in expansion. This rising leverage, coupled with a modest return on equity of 12.01%, raises concerns about capital efficiency. In terms of institutional sentiment, foreign institutional investors have reduced their stake, indicating potential concerns about valuation and growth sustainability. Conversely, domestic institutional investors have increased their holdings, reflecting a differing perspective on the company's long-term growth potential. Overall, the company saw an adjustment in its evaluation, reflecting the complexities of its operational performance amidst rising costs and competitive pressures in the healthcare sector. The results underscore the need for ongoing monitoring of both operational trends and financial metrics as the company navigates its expansion strategy.
{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News