Arrow Greentech Q2 FY26: Profitability Plunges as Operating Margins Contract Sharply

Nov 15 2025 09:23 AM IST
share
Share Via
Arrow Greentech Ltd., a micro-cap packaging company with a market capitalisation of ₹883.00 crores, reported a concerning Q2 FY26 performance marked by sharp margin compression and declining profitability. The company posted a consolidated net profit of ₹15.74 crores for the quarter ended September 2025, representing a decline of 15.65% year-on-year despite a sequential improvement of 44.40% from Q1 FY26's ₹10.90 crores. The stock has responded negatively to the company's deteriorating fundamentals, plunging 35.59% over the past year whilst the Sensex advanced 9.00%, resulting in a painful underperformance of 44.59 percentage points.





Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

₹15.74 Cr

▼ 15.65% YoY



Revenue (Q2 FY26)

₹61.07 Cr

▼ 5.81% YoY



Operating Margin

33.98%

▼ 656 bps YoY



PAT Margin

25.77%

▼ 293 bps YoY




The quarter's results paint a troubling picture of a company grappling with significant operational headwinds. Whilst net sales of ₹61.07 crores showed a robust sequential recovery of 46.80% from the subdued Q1 FY26 base of ₹41.60 crores, the year-on-year comparison reveals a 5.81% decline from ₹64.84 crores in Q2 FY25. More concerning is the dramatic erosion in operating profitability, with the operating margin (excluding other income) contracting sharply to 33.98% from 40.56% in the corresponding quarter last year—a deterioration of 658 basis points that signals mounting cost pressures.



The company's share price of ₹560.10 as of November 14, 2025, reflects investor scepticism about the sustainability of Arrow Greentech's business model. Trading at a price-to-earnings ratio of 17.00x—well below the industry average of 40.00x—the stock appears optically cheap, yet this discount seems justified given the negative financial trend and bearish technical outlook. The stock has shed 41.85% from its 52-week high of ₹963.15, currently hovering just 13.96% above its 52-week low of ₹491.50.



Financial Performance: A Tale of Margin Compression



Arrow Greentech's Q2 FY26 financial performance reveals a company struggling to maintain its historically robust profitability levels. Net sales of ₹61.07 crores, whilst showing sequential improvement, declined 5.81% year-on-year, marking the second consecutive quarter of negative YoY growth. The company's revenue trajectory has been erratic, with quarterly sales oscillating between ₹41.60 crores and ₹66.11 crores over the past seven quarters, suggesting challenges in achieving consistent top-line momentum.

























































































Quarter Net Sales (₹ Cr) QoQ Growth YoY Growth Net Profit (₹ Cr) QoQ Growth YoY Growth Operating Margin
Sep'25 61.07 +46.80% -5.81% 15.74 +44.40% -15.65% 33.98%
Jun'25 41.60 -27.39% -37.07% 10.90 -4.72% -45.91% 34.25%
Mar'25 57.29 +3.96% +13.18% 11.44 -11.04% +12.93% 28.00%
Dec'24 55.11 -15.01% 12.86 -31.08% 32.52%
Sep'24 64.84 -1.92% 18.66 -7.39% 40.56%
Jun'24 66.11 +30.60% 20.15 +98.91% 42.44%
Mar'24 50.62 10.13 30.86%



The most alarming aspect of Q2 FY26 results is the precipitous decline in operating profitability. Operating profit (PBDIT excluding other income) stood at ₹20.75 crores, yielding an operating margin of 33.98%—a substantial contraction from 40.56% in Q2 FY25 and even below the 34.25% recorded in the weak Q1 FY26. This 658-basis-point year-on-year margin compression suggests the company is facing significant cost pressures that it has been unable to pass through to customers via pricing power.





Revenue (Q2 FY26)

₹61.07 Cr

+46.80% QoQ | -5.81% YoY



Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

₹15.74 Cr

+44.40% QoQ | -15.65% YoY



Operating Margin

33.98%

▼ 31 bps QoQ | ▼ 658 bps YoY



PAT Margin

25.77%

▼ 48 bps QoQ | ▼ 293 bps YoY




Profit after tax of ₹15.74 crores translated to a PAT margin of 25.77%, down from 28.70% in Q2 FY25. The effective tax rate of 24.22% remained relatively stable, suggesting the margin compression stems primarily from operational factors rather than changes in the tax structure. Employee costs remained well-controlled at ₹4.02 crores, representing just 6.58% of revenues, indicating the pressure points lie elsewhere in the cost structure—likely in raw materials or other operating expenses.



Operational Challenges: Deteriorating Capital Efficiency



Beneath the surface-level financials, Arrow Greentech's operational metrics reveal deeper concerns about the quality and sustainability of its business model. The company's return on equity (ROE) of 15.37% on an average basis, whilst respectable in absolute terms, masks a concerning trend when examined on a half-yearly basis for H1 FY26. The deterioration in profitability has directly impacted capital efficiency, raising questions about the company's ability to generate attractive returns for shareholders going forward.




Critical Concern: Sharp ROCE Deterioration


Arrow Greentech's return on capital employed (ROCE) for H1 FY26 plummeted to 31.99%—the lowest level recorded—despite the company maintaining a virtually debt-free balance sheet. This represents a dramatic decline from the company's average ROCE of 22.92% and the impressive 82.78% achieved in the most recent annual period. The sharp deterioration in ROCE, despite minimal debt, suggests fundamental operational inefficiencies are eroding the company's ability to generate returns from its capital base. This is particularly concerning given that higher ROCE typically indicates superior capital efficiency and profitability—a strength that appears to be rapidly diminishing.




The company's balance sheet, whilst appearing healthy on the surface, reveals some concerning trends. Shareholder funds stood at ₹188.26 crores as of March 2025, representing steady growth from ₹126.86 crores a year earlier. The company operates with virtually no debt—long-term debt of zero and minimal interest expenses of just ₹0.12 crores in Q2 FY26—which ordinarily would be viewed as a significant strength. However, the inability to generate strong returns despite this clean balance sheet raises questions about capital allocation efficiency.



Current assets surged to ₹152.64 crores as of March 2025 from ₹83.75 crores the previous year, driven primarily by a build-up in working capital. This substantial increase in current assets, without a commensurate improvement in profitability, suggests potential inventory accumulation or slower receivables collection—both indicators of operational stress. The debtors turnover ratio of 17.60 times in H1 FY26, whilst marked as the highest level, needs to be monitored in the context of declining sales growth to ensure it reflects genuine efficiency rather than aggressive revenue recognition.



Industry Context: Underperforming the Packaging Sector



Arrow Greentech's struggles become even more pronounced when viewed against the backdrop of the broader packaging industry. The company's stock has dramatically underperformed its sector, declining 35.59% over the past year whilst the packaging sector fell a more modest 11.58%—resulting in an underperformance of 24.01 percentage points. This substantial gap suggests company-specific challenges rather than industry-wide headwinds.



The packaging industry in India has benefited from structural tailwinds including rising consumption, e-commerce growth, and increasing preference for organised retail. However, the sector also faces challenges from volatile raw material prices, particularly for petroleum-based inputs, and intense competition that limits pricing power. Arrow Greentech's inability to maintain its historically strong margins suggests it may be losing competitive positioning or facing product-specific headwinds that peers have managed to navigate more successfully.




Market Positioning: Trading at a Discount for Good Reason


Arrow Greentech trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of 17.00x, representing a substantial 57.5% discount to the packaging industry average of 40.00x. Whilst this might appear to offer value, the discount seems justified given the company's negative financial trend, deteriorating margins, and concerning operational metrics. The stock's price-to-book ratio of 4.49x, however, remains elevated relative to most packaging peers, suggesting the market may not have fully repriced the stock to reflect its diminished earnings power and growth prospects.




Peer Comparison: Premium Valuation Despite Weaker Fundamentals



A comparison with industry peers reveals Arrow Greentech's mixed positioning. Whilst the company demonstrates superior return on equity at 15.37% compared to most peers, its premium price-to-book valuation of 4.49x stands out starkly against competitors trading at significantly lower multiples. This valuation disconnect becomes particularly concerning when considering the company's recent operational deterioration.

































































Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE % Div Yield % Debt to Equity
Arrow Greentech 16.59 4.49 15.37 0.71 -0.48
Cosmo First 14.18 1.35 17.89 0.51 0.86
Huhtamaki India 18.10 1.46 6.99 0.84 -0.11
Cropster Agro 107.14 13.62 10.65 -0.01
Ester Industries 45.32 1.33 7.89 0.57 0.73
Oricon Enterprises 14.84 0.73 1.09 0.86 -0.08



Arrow Greentech's price-to-book ratio of 4.49x is more than triple the peer group average and second only to the outlier Cropster Agro. This premium appears unjustified given that competitors like Cosmo First deliver superior ROE of 17.89% whilst trading at just 1.35x book value. The company's ROE advantage over most peers is eroding rapidly, as evidenced by the sharp deterioration in recent quarters, making the valuation premium increasingly difficult to defend.



The company's debt-free status (negative net debt to equity of -0.48) represents a genuine competitive advantage, providing financial flexibility that leveraged peers lack. However, this strength is insufficient to offset the concerning operational trends. Arrow Greentech's dividend yield of 0.71%, based on a recent dividend of ₹4 per share, lags behind several peers and reflects the company's conservative payout ratio of just 9.56%—suggesting management may be conserving cash in anticipation of continued challenges.



Valuation Analysis: Expensive Despite Recent Decline



Despite the stock's 35.59% decline over the past year, Arrow Greentech continues to trade at what can only be characterised as expensive valuations. The company's current valuation grade of "Very Expensive" reflects a market price that appears disconnected from underlying fundamentals. At a price-to-earnings ratio of 17.00x, the stock trades at a discount to the industry average, yet this seemingly attractive multiple fails to account for the negative earnings trajectory and deteriorating operational metrics.





P/E Ratio (TTM)

17.00x

vs Industry: 40.00x



Price to Book

4.49x

Premium to peers



EV/EBITDA

10.94x

Above historical average



Dividend Yield

0.71%

Below peer average




The price-to-book ratio of 4.49x represents a substantial premium that appears increasingly unjustified. For context, the company's book value per share stands at ₹124.76, implying the market is valuing the business at more than four and a half times its net asset value. This premium typically reflects expectations of superior returns on equity and strong growth prospects—neither of which Arrow Greentech is currently delivering. The company's ROE, whilst historically respectable, is deteriorating, and growth has turned negative on a year-on-year basis.



The enterprise value multiples paint a similar picture. At 10.94x EV/EBITDA and 12.32x EV/EBIT, Arrow Greentech trades at valuations that would be appropriate for a company demonstrating consistent growth and margin expansion—precisely the opposite of what the company is currently experiencing. The EV/Sales multiple of 3.51x appears particularly stretched given the company's declining revenue trajectory and compressed margins.




"At current valuations, Arrow Greentech offers neither growth nor value—a dangerous combination that leaves little margin of safety for investors."


Shareholding Pattern: Promoters Reduce Stake Amid Struggles



The shareholding pattern reveals a notable development that should give investors pause. Promoter holding declined from 66.75% in September 2024 to 64.81% by December 2024—a reduction of 1.94 percentage points—and has remained stable at that lower level through September 2025. Whilst the decline may have legitimate explanations, the timing—coinciding with deteriorating operational performance—is concerning and suggests promoters may have reduced exposure as challenges mounted.

























































Quarter Promoter % QoQ Change FII % DII % Non-Institutional %
Sep'25 64.81 0.00 0.12 0.69 34.38
Jun'25 64.81 0.00 0.25 0.11 34.83
Mar'25 64.81 0.00 0.27 0.04 34.88
Dec'24 64.81 -1.94 0.56 0.00 34.62
Sep'24 66.75 0.09 0.00 33.16



Foreign institutional investor (FII) holding has been volatile and minimal, declining from 0.56% in December 2024 to just 0.12% in September 2025. This exodus of foreign capital suggests sophisticated international investors have lost confidence in the company's prospects. Domestic institutional investors (DIIs) have shown marginal interest, with holdings increasing from 0.00% to 0.69% over the past year, but this remains negligible and insufficient to signal institutional confidence.



The absence of mutual fund holdings (0.00% throughout) is particularly telling. Indian mutual funds, which typically conduct thorough due diligence before investing, have shown no interest in Arrow Greentech despite the stock's apparent valuation discount. This lack of institutional participation leaves the stock dominated by retail and non-institutional investors (34.38%), who may be less equipped to weather prolonged periods of operational underperformance.



Stock Performance: Severe Underperformance Across Timeframes



Arrow Greentech's stock price performance has been dismal across most relevant timeframes, with particularly severe underperformance over the past year. The stock has declined 35.59% over the trailing twelve months, creating negative alpha of 44.59 percentage points relative to the Sensex's 9.00% gain. This dramatic underperformance reflects the market's recognition of the company's deteriorating fundamentals and uncertain outlook.































































Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week -5.11% +1.62% -6.73%
1 Month +5.54% +3.09% +2.45%
3 Month +2.18% +4.92% -2.74%
6 Month -2.65% +3.97% -6.62%
YTD -29.06% +8.22% -37.28%
1 Year -35.59% +9.00% -44.59%
3 Years +350.60% +37.22% +313.38%
5 Years +1047.75% +93.78% +953.97%



The year-to-date performance of -29.06% underscores the severity of the stock's decline, with the company surrendering nearly a third of its value in 2025 alone. The six-month return of -2.65% versus the Sensex's +3.97% gain highlights persistent underperformance even over intermediate timeframes. Only the one-month period shows marginal outperformance, likely reflecting technical bounce rather than fundamental improvement.



The stock's long-term performance paints a starkly different picture, with spectacular returns of 1047.75% over five years and 350.60% over three years—both representing massive outperformance versus the broader market. However, these historical gains appear to have been driven by a period of exceptional operational performance that has now reversed. The sharp divergence between long-term strength and recent weakness suggests the company may have reached an inflection point where past success is giving way to structural challenges.



Technical indicators universally point to continued weakness. The stock trades below all key moving averages—5-day (₹568.47), 20-day (₹586.75), 50-day (₹570.52), 100-day (₹615.69), and 200-day (₹612.96)—a configuration that typically signals sustained bearish momentum. The overall technical trend classification of "Bearish" reflects deteriorating price action, with multiple indicators including Bollinger Bands, Moving Averages, and KST all flashing negative signals.



Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags Outweigh Limited Strengths



Arrow Greentech's investment thesis has deteriorated markedly, with the company's proprietary Mojo score of just 27 out of 100 reflecting severe concerns across multiple dimensions. This "Strong Sell" rating, unchanged since August 2025, captures the confluence of negative factors: bearish technical trends, negative financial trends, expensive valuations, and deteriorating operational metrics. The company's score places it firmly in the 0-30 range reserved for stocks facing significant headwinds with limited near-term catalysts for improvement.





Valuation Grade

Very Expensive

Premium unjustified



Quality Grade

Average

Deteriorating



Financial Trend

Negative

Since Jun'25



Technical Trend

Bearish

Multiple indicators weak




The company's quality grade of "Average" represents a downgrade from previous periods and reflects the erosion of competitive advantages that once distinguished Arrow Greentech. Whilst the company maintains some positive attributes—including a debt-free balance sheet and historically strong growth—these strengths are being overwhelmed by mounting operational challenges. The negative financial trend designation, in place since June 2025, captures the sequential deterioration in key metrics including profit before tax, ROCE, PAT, and net sales growth.



Key Strengths & Risk Factors





KEY STRENGTHS



  • Debt-Free Balance Sheet: Zero long-term debt and minimal interest expenses provide financial flexibility and resilience

  • Strong Historical Growth: Five-year sales CAGR of 57.90% and EBIT CAGR of 57.32% demonstrate past execution capability

  • Healthy Cash Position: Operating cash flow of ₹67.57 crores in FY25 and cash reserves of ₹60.27 crores in H1 FY26

  • No Promoter Pledging: Zero pledged shares indicate promoter confidence and financial stability

  • Established Market Position: Operating since 1992 with expertise in water-soluble films and packaging solutions

  • Profitable Operations: Despite recent deterioration, company maintains positive PAT margins above 25%




KEY CONCERNS



  • Severe Margin Compression: Operating margins contracted 658 bps YoY to 33.98%, signalling significant cost pressures

  • Declining Revenue Growth: Net sales fell 5.81% YoY in Q2 FY26, marking second consecutive quarter of negative growth

  • Deteriorating Capital Efficiency: ROCE plummeted to 31.99% in H1 FY26, lowest level recorded despite minimal debt

  • Promoter Stake Reduction: Promoters reduced holding from 66.75% to 64.81% during period of operational challenges

  • Institutional Absence: Zero mutual fund holdings and declining FII participation signal lack of sophisticated investor confidence

  • Expensive Valuation: P/BV of 4.49x appears unjustified given negative trends and deteriorating fundamentals

  • Severe Stock Underperformance: Down 35.59% over past year with negative alpha of 44.59 percentage points versus Sensex





Outlook: What to Watch





POSITIVE CATALYSTS



  • Margin Recovery: Stabilisation and improvement in operating margins back towards 38-40% levels

  • Revenue Momentum: Return to positive YoY revenue growth with quarterly sales consistently above ₹65 crores

  • ROCE Improvement: Reversal of capital efficiency deterioration with ROCE trending back above 50%

  • Institutional Interest: Entry of mutual funds or sustained increase in FII/DII holdings above 2-3%

  • Cost Control Measures: Demonstrable management actions to address cost pressures and restore profitability




RED FLAGS TO MONITOR



  • Further Margin Deterioration: Operating margins falling below 30% would signal deepening structural issues

  • Sustained Revenue Decline: Third consecutive quarter of negative YoY growth would indicate loss of market share

  • Working Capital Build-up: Continued increase in current assets without revenue growth suggesting inventory or collection issues

  • Additional Promoter Selling: Further reduction in promoter stake would raise serious governance concerns

  • Institutional Exit: Decline in already minimal DII holdings or complete FII exodus





The path forward for Arrow Greentech requires urgent management action to arrest the deteriorating operational trends. The company must demonstrate its ability to restore margins to historically normal levels whilst reigniting top-line growth. Investors should monitor quarterly results closely for evidence of stabilisation, particularly in operating margins and ROCE metrics. The absence of meaningful institutional participation suggests professional investors remain unconvinced of a near-term turnaround, placing the burden of proof squarely on management to deliver tangible improvements.




The Verdict: Exit Recommended as Fundamentals Deteriorate


STRONG SELL

Score: 27/100


For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions in Arrow Greentech at current levels. The combination of negative financial trends, expensive valuations, and deteriorating operational metrics offers no margin of safety. The stock's 35.59% decline over the past year appears justified by fundamentals, and further downside remains likely until the company demonstrates sustained operational improvement. The absence of institutional participation and promoter stake reduction during challenging times raise additional red flags.


For Existing Holders: Consider exiting positions and reallocating capital to higher-quality opportunities. The stock's spectacular long-term gains of 1047.75% over five years have reversed sharply, and the inflection point suggests past success may not be repeatable. With operating margins compressed by 658 basis points, ROCE deteriorating to multi-quarter lows, and revenue growth turning negative, the investment thesis has fundamentally changed. The premium valuation of 4.49x book value is unjustified given current trends.


Fair Value Estimate: ₹420-450 (25-30% downside from current levels), based on normalised earnings of ₹40-45 crores and a P/E multiple of 14-15x reflecting the company's challenged growth profile and deteriorating returns on capital.





Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)





⚠️ Investment Disclaimer


This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The views expressed are based on publicly available information and analysis as of the date of publication and are subject to change.





{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News