Artemis Medicare Q2 FY26: Strong Profit Growth Masks Underlying Concerns

Nov 12 2025 09:54 AM IST
share
Share Via
Artemis Medicare Services Ltd., a Gurugram-based multi-speciality hospital operator, reported consolidated net profit of ₹29.97 crores for Q2 FY26, marking a robust 40.84% sequential increase from ₹21.28 crores in Q1 FY26 and a 34.64% year-on-year surge from ₹22.26 crores in Q2 FY25. Despite this impressive profit growth, the stock faces headwinds from weak return ratios, elevated pledged promoter holdings at 44.53%, and a mildly bearish technical trend that has investors questioning the sustainability of the current valuation.



With a market capitalisation of ₹3,743 crores and trading at ₹274.05 following a 9.12% single-day surge, Artemis Medicare commands a premium P/E ratio of 40x against an industry average of 66x. However, the company's return on equity of just 8.11% and return on capital employed of 9.56% remain significantly below peer benchmarks, raising questions about capital efficiency despite the strong top-line momentum.





Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

₹29.97 Cr

▲ 40.84% QoQ



YoY Growth

34.64%

vs Q2 FY25



Operating Margin

18.42%

Highest in 8 quarters



PAT Margin

10.92%

▲ 260 bps QoQ




The quarter's standout performance was driven by a combination of revenue expansion and margin improvement. Net sales climbed 7.74% sequentially to ₹274.70 crores, whilst year-on-year growth accelerated to 13.79%. More impressively, operating margins expanded sharply to 18.42% from 16.24% in the previous quarter, reflecting improved operational leverage and better cost management across the hospital network.









































































Quarter Net Sales (₹ Cr) QoQ Growth Net Profit (₹ Cr) QoQ Growth Operating Margin
Sep'25 274.70 +7.74% 29.97 +40.84% 18.42%
Jun'25 254.96 +6.28% 21.28 -7.60% 16.24%
Mar'25 239.90 +3.23% 23.03 +11.42% 14.96%
Dec'24 232.39 -3.74% 20.67 -7.14% 16.12%
Sep'24 241.42 +8.16% 22.26 +33.53% 17.50%
Jun'24 223.20 -0.91% 16.67 +17.56% 16.21%
Mar'24 225.24 14.18 16.85%



Financial Performance: Margin Expansion Drives Bottom Line



Artemis Medicare's Q2 FY26 results reveal a company hitting its operational stride, with net sales reaching ₹274.70 crores—the highest quarterly figure in the company's recent history. The 13.79% year-on-year growth demonstrates sustained demand for healthcare services at the Gurugram facility, whilst sequential growth of 7.74% indicates strong momentum entering the festive season.



The most striking aspect of the quarter's performance was the sharp margin expansion. Operating profit (PBDIT) excluding other income surged to ₹50.61 crores, translating to an operating margin of 18.42%—a significant improvement from 16.24% in Q1 FY26 and the highest level recorded in the past eight quarters. This margin expansion was achieved despite employee costs rising to ₹39.27 crores from ₹38.40 crores sequentially, suggesting improved revenue realisation per patient and better capacity utilisation.



The profit after tax margin expanded dramatically to 10.92% from 8.32% in the previous quarter, driven by a combination of operational leverage and a more favourable tax rate. The effective tax rate declined to 23.79% from 28.84% in Q1 FY26, contributing approximately ₹1.50 crores to the bottom line improvement. Interest costs remained stable at ₹7.19 crores, down marginally from ₹7.38 crores, reflecting the company's disciplined approach to debt management.





Revenue (Q2 FY26)

₹274.70 Cr

▲ 13.79% YoY



Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

₹29.97 Cr

▲ 34.64% YoY



Operating Margin

18.42%

▲ 218 bps QoQ



PAT Margin

10.92%

▲ 260 bps QoQ




Other income contributed ₹7.65 crores to the quarter's performance, up from ₹6.93 crores in Q1 FY26 but significantly below the exceptional ₹12.35 crores recorded in Q4 FY25. Whilst this income stream provides a useful cushion, the company's core operating performance remains the primary value driver, with operating profit to interest coverage reaching a robust 7.04 times—the highest level in recent quarters.



Operational Challenges: The Return Ratio Conundrum



Despite the impressive quarterly results, Artemis Medicare continues to grapple with a fundamental challenge that has plagued the business for years: anaemic return ratios that suggest significant capital is deployed without commensurate returns. The company's return on equity stands at just 8.11%, well below the 15% threshold typically expected from quality healthcare businesses and significantly trailing the peer average of approximately 20%.



The return on capital employed paints a similar picture at 9.56%, indicating that the company generates less than ₹10 of operating profit for every ₹100 of capital deployed. This weak capital efficiency becomes particularly concerning when viewed against the backdrop of the company's substantial fixed asset base of ₹705.23 crores as of March 2025, representing a significant portion of the total asset base. The hospital business is inherently capital-intensive, requiring substantial investments in medical equipment, infrastructure, and technology, but Artemis has struggled to translate these investments into superior returns.




⚠️ Capital Efficiency Concerns


With ROE at 8.11% and ROCE at 9.56%, Artemis Medicare significantly underperforms the hospital sector average. The company has deployed ₹705.23 crores in fixed assets but generates returns that barely exceed the cost of capital. This raises questions about the quality of capital allocation decisions and the pricing power of the hospital network.


Key Issue: Operating profit to sales of 18.42% is healthy, but the translation to return ratios is weak, suggesting either excess capital deployment or subdued asset turnover. Sales to capital employed stands at just 0.99x, indicating that ₹1 of capital generates only ₹1 of annual revenue—a concerning metric for a mature hospital operation.




The balance sheet reveals a company that has been investing aggressively, with shareholder funds nearly doubling from ₹448.35 crores in March 2024 to ₹837.68 crores in March 2025, driven by retained earnings and a modest equity infusion. Long-term debt stood at ₹209.48 crores, down from ₹227.72 crores a year earlier, reflecting debt reduction efforts. However, the net debt to equity ratio of -0.13 indicates the company maintains net cash, which should theoretically support higher returns but doesn't appear to be doing so.



Current assets surged to ₹538.86 crores from ₹180.10 crores year-on-year, a dramatic increase that warrants scrutiny. This jump suggests either a significant build-up in working capital or one-time cash receipts that may not be sustainable. Working capital management appears to have improved based on the cash flow statement, which showed operating cash flows of ₹145 crores for FY25, but the sustainability of this improvement remains to be demonstrated.



Industry Context: Navigating a Competitive Healthcare Landscape



Artemis Medicare operates in India's rapidly evolving private healthcare sector, which has witnessed robust growth driven by rising disposable incomes, increasing health awareness, and a growing preference for quality medical care. The company's single-facility model in Gurugram positions it in one of India's most affluent catchment areas, with access to a patient base that can afford premium healthcare services.



However, this competitive advantage comes with challenges. The National Capital Region has seen significant capacity additions from established players like Max Healthcare, Fortis Healthcare, and Medanta, intensifying competition for patients and medical talent. Artemis must continuously invest in cutting-edge medical technology and attract top-tier doctors to maintain its competitive positioning, which partially explains the elevated capital expenditure and the pressure on return ratios.



The hospital sector has demonstrated resilience post-pandemic, with occupancy rates recovering to pre-COVID levels and average revenue per occupied bed (ARPOB) showing steady improvement. Artemis appears to be benefiting from these trends, as evidenced by the consistent revenue growth and margin expansion. However, the company's inability to translate this into superior returns suggests either pricing constraints or operational inefficiencies that need addressing.




Sector Dynamics: A Double-Edged Sword


The Indian hospital sector is expected to grow at a CAGR of 10-12% over the next five years, driven by medical tourism, rising chronic disease prevalence, and insurance penetration. Artemis Medicare is well-positioned to capture this growth given its location and multi-speciality capabilities.


However, the sector faces headwinds from regulatory pressures on pricing, particularly for government-mandated schemes, and rising input costs including medical consumables and skilled labour. The company's ability to navigate these challenges whilst improving return ratios will determine whether it can command a valuation premium over the long term.




Peer Comparison: Valuation Discount Reflects Performance Gap



A comparison with listed hospital peers reveals why Artemis Medicare trades at a relative valuation discount despite recent operational improvements. The company's P/E ratio of 40x appears elevated in isolation but is actually below the peer group average of approximately 54x, reflecting investor scepticism about the sustainability of earnings growth and the quality of those earnings.

































































Company P/E Ratio (TTM) P/BV Ratio ROE (%) Debt to Equity Dividend Yield (%)
Artemis Medicare 40.08 4.17 8.11 -0.13 0.18
Jupiter Life Line 50.04 6.85 14.12 -0.10 0.07
Jeena Sikho 108.15 33.52 33.52 -0.07 0.15
Yatharth Hospital 51.41 4.55 8.13 -0.31
Kovai Medical 29.68 5.70 19.55 0.08 0.16
Indraprastha Medical 28.84 7.66 24.88 -0.65 0.82



The most glaring gap emerges when examining return on equity. Artemis Medicare's ROE of 8.11% ranks at the bottom of the peer group, with only Yatharth Hospital posting a comparable figure at 8.13%. In contrast, established players like Indraprastha Medical and Kovai Medical deliver ROEs of 24.88% and 19.55% respectively, justifying their valuation premiums. Even the high-flying Jeena Sikho, with an ROE of 33.52%, trades at a stratospheric P/E of 108x, demonstrating the market's willingness to pay for superior capital efficiency.



The price-to-book ratio of 4.17x for Artemis Medicare appears reasonable compared to peers, particularly when considering that companies with superior ROEs command P/BV ratios ranging from 5.70x to 33.52x. This suggests that if Artemis can sustainably improve its return ratios towards peer levels, significant re-rating potential exists. However, the current valuation already prices in expectations of improvement, leaving limited margin for disappointment.



Debt positioning provides one area where Artemis compares favourably. With a net cash position (debt to equity of -0.13), the company maintains financial flexibility that peers like Kovai Medical (debt to equity of 0.08) lack. This conservative balance sheet approach provides a cushion during economic downturns but also contributes to the subdued return ratios, as excess cash earns minimal returns.



Valuation Analysis: Attractive Entry Point or Value Trap?



At the current market price of ₹274.05, Artemis Medicare trades at a P/E ratio of 40x trailing twelve-month earnings, representing a 39% discount to the hospital sector average of 66x. The company's proprietary valuation grade of "Attractive" suggests the stock offers reasonable value at current levels, particularly for investors willing to look past near-term challenges and bet on operational improvements.



The EV/EBITDA multiple of 21.60x appears elevated compared to historical averages but remains below peak levels seen during the pandemic-driven healthcare rally. More concerning is the EV/EBIT multiple of 30.42x, which reflects the company's depreciation burden from its substantial fixed asset base. The EV/Sales ratio of 3.50x indicates that investors are paying ₹3.50 for every rupee of revenue, a premium that assumes sustained margin expansion and improved asset utilisation.





P/E Ratio (TTM)

40.08x

vs Sector 66x



P/BV Ratio

4.17x

Peer Avg ~11.7x



EV/EBITDA

21.60x

Moderate premium



Dividend Yield

0.18%

Minimal income




The PEG ratio of 0.75 suggests the stock may be undervalued relative to its growth prospects, as any figure below 1.0 theoretically indicates an attractive entry point. However, this metric must be interpreted cautiously given the company's inconsistent earnings trajectory and the sustainability questions surrounding recent margin improvements. The five-year sales CAGR of 14.51% and EBIT CAGR of 49.66% demonstrate strong historical growth, but whether this can be maintained as the base effect diminishes remains uncertain.



The dividend yield of 0.18% offers negligible income, with the company paying out just 12.44% of earnings as dividends. This conservative payout ratio suggests management prioritises reinvestment for growth, which aligns with the substantial capex requirements of the hospital business. However, the low absolute dividend of ₹0.45 per share provides little support to the stock price during market downturns.



From a fair value perspective, assuming the company can sustain 15% earnings growth and gradually improve ROE towards 12-13% over the next three years, a target P/E of 35-38x appears reasonable, implying a fair value range of ₹240-260. At the current price of ₹274.05, the stock trades at a slight premium to this estimated fair value, suggesting limited upside in the near term unless operational improvements exceed expectations.



Shareholding Pattern: Stable Promoter Base with Rising Institutional Interest



The shareholding structure of Artemis Medicare reveals a stable promoter base but raises concerns about the elevated pledge levels. Promoter holding has remained steady at 44.53% over the past five quarters, with Constructive Finance Private Limited holding the entire promoter stake. However, the fact that 44.53% of shares are pledged—essentially the entire promoter holding—represents a significant red flag that investors cannot ignore.

























































Quarter Promoter (%) FII (%) Mutual Funds (%) Insurance (%) Other DII (%)
Sep'25 44.53 0.37 2.01 0.46 8.82
Jun'25 44.53 0.24 1.96 0.69 9.13
Mar'25 44.53 0.31 1.96 0.71 9.46
Dec'24 44.53 0.64 1.74 0.49 9.37
Sep'24 44.53 0.22 1.22 0.29 9.18



On a more positive note, institutional interest has been gradually building. Mutual fund holdings increased from 1.22% in September 2024 to 2.01% in September 2025, representing a 65% increase in institutional participation. This uptick suggests that fund managers are taking notice of the company's improving operational metrics and see value at current levels. However, the absolute level of mutual fund ownership remains modest, with only four mutual funds holding positions in the stock.



Foreign institutional investor (FII) holdings have fluctuated between 0.22% and 0.64% over the past five quarters, settling at 0.37% as of September 2025. The minimal FII participation reflects the company's small-cap status and limited liquidity, which makes it unsuitable for large foreign funds. Insurance company holdings declined to 0.46% from 0.69% in the previous quarter, suggesting some institutional profit-taking following the recent rally.



Other domestic institutional investors (DIIs) maintain the largest institutional stake at 8.82%, though this has declined marginally from 9.46% in March 2025. Combined institutional holdings of 11.66% provide some stability to the stock but remain well below the 20-25% threshold typically associated with strong institutional conviction. The non-institutional category, comprising retail and high-net-worth investors, holds 21.81%, up from 20.39% in March 2025, indicating growing retail interest.



Stock Performance: Volatility Dominates Recent Trading



Artemis Medicare's stock price performance tells a story of extreme volatility and investor uncertainty. Trading at ₹274.05 after a 9.12% single-day surge, the stock has delivered mixed returns across different timeframes, reflecting the market's struggle to assign a consistent valuation to the business.





































































Period Stock Return (%) Sensex Return (%) Alpha (%)
1 Week +11.77 +1.24 +10.53
1 Month +14.43 +2.41 +12.02
3 Months +14.64 +5.30 +9.34
6 Months +7.89 +2.50 +5.39
YTD -12.70 +8.13 -20.83
1 Year -3.23 +7.39 -10.62
2 Years +69.11 +29.47 +39.64
3 Years +268.84 +36.73 +232.11
5 Years +1,645.54 +94.87 +1,550.67



The short-term picture appears encouraging, with the stock delivering 11.77% returns over the past week and 14.43% over one month, significantly outperforming the Sensex. This recent strength follows a period of consolidation and reflects positive investor sentiment following the Q2 results announcement. The three-month and six-month returns of 14.64% and 7.89% respectively demonstrate sustained momentum, though the alpha generation has moderated as the timeframe extends.



However, the medium-term performance raises concerns. Year-to-date, the stock has declined 12.70% against a Sensex gain of 8.13%, resulting in negative alpha of 20.83 percentage points. The one-year return of -3.23% versus the Sensex's 7.39% gain indicates the stock has underperformed the broader market, likely reflecting concerns about valuation sustainability and execution risks. The stock has also underperformed the hospital sector, which delivered 21.05% returns over the past year, highlighting company-specific challenges.



The longer-term picture presents a dramatically different narrative. Two-year returns of 69.11% and three-year returns of 268.84% demonstrate the wealth-creation potential for patient investors who bought during the pandemic lows. The five-year returns of 1,645.54% are truly exceptional, though this largely reflects the recovery from depressed valuations in 2019-20 when the company was grappling with operational challenges.



From a technical perspective, the stock currently trades in a "mildly bearish" trend that began on October 14, 2025, though the recent surge has pushed prices above all key moving averages. The stock trades at ₹274.05 against the 200-day moving average of ₹254.40, suggesting near-term strength. However, the 52-week high of ₹348.30 remains 21.32% away, indicating significant overhead resistance. The volatility of 38.67% over the past year places the stock in the "high risk" category, with a negative Sharpe ratio reflecting poor risk-adjusted returns.




"Artemis Medicare exemplifies the challenge facing small-cap healthcare investors: strong operational momentum colliding with structural concerns about capital efficiency and governance, creating a high-risk, high-reward proposition that demands careful position sizing."


Investment Thesis: A Story of Two Narratives



The investment case for Artemis Medicare rests on two competing narratives that investors must weigh carefully. The bull case emphasises improving operational metrics, margin expansion, and the long runway for growth in India's private healthcare sector. The company has demonstrated its ability to scale revenues, with the five-year sales CAGR of 14.51% exceeding GDP growth and reflecting market share gains in its catchment area.



The recent quarter's margin expansion to 18.42% suggests the business is achieving operating leverage as it matures, with incremental revenues flowing through to the bottom line at attractive rates. If management can sustain operating margins in the 17-19% range whilst continuing to grow revenues at double-digit rates, the earnings trajectory could support the current valuation and potentially drive re-rating as the track record builds.



The bear case centres on the persistent weakness in return ratios and the governance concerns raised by the fully pledged promoter stake. An ROE of 8.11% is simply inadequate for a business trading at 4.17 times book value, suggesting either the book value is overstated or the company is destroying shareholder value through poor capital allocation. The elevated pledge levels create refinancing risk and raise questions about the promoter's financial health, which could trigger forced selling in adverse market conditions.





Valuation

Attractive

P/E 40x vs Sector 66x



Quality Grade

Average

ROE 8.11%



Financial Trend

Positive

Q2 FY26



Technical Trend

Mildly Bearish

High volatility




The company's single-facility model presents both opportunity and risk. Whilst it allows management to focus resources and maintain quality standards, it also creates concentration risk and limits growth optionality. Competitors operating multi-facility networks can leverage shared services, negotiate better rates with suppliers, and reduce dependence on any single market. Artemis's inability to expand beyond Gurugram over 18 years of operations raises questions about management ambition and capital availability.



Key Strengths & Risk Factors





✅ Key Strengths



  • Revenue Momentum: Consistent double-digit top-line growth with Q2 FY26 sales reaching all-time high of ₹274.70 crores

  • Margin Expansion: Operating margins improved to 18.42%, highest in eight quarters, demonstrating operational leverage

  • Net Cash Position: Debt to equity of -0.13 provides financial flexibility and reduces refinancing risk

  • Strong Cash Generation: Operating cash flow of ₹145 crores in FY25 supports growth without excessive leverage

  • Premium Location: Gurugram facility serves affluent catchment area with ability to charge premium pricing

  • Sector Tailwinds: Indian healthcare sector poised for 10-12% CAGR growth driven by demographics and insurance penetration

  • Attractive Valuation: P/E of 40x represents 39% discount to sector average despite improving fundamentals




⚠️ Key Concerns



  • Weak Return Ratios: ROE of 8.11% and ROCE of 9.56% significantly below peer benchmarks and cost of capital

  • 100% Promoter Pledge: Entire 44.53% promoter stake pledged raises governance concerns and creates forced selling risk

  • Single Facility Risk: Concentration in one hospital limits growth options and creates operational risk

  • High Volatility: 38.67% annual volatility with negative Sharpe ratio indicates poor risk-adjusted returns

  • Limited Institutional Support: Only 11.66% institutional holdings suggests lack of conviction from sophisticated investors

  • Underperformance vs Sector: One-year return of -3.23% trails hospital sector's 21.05% gain by 24.28 percentage points

  • Minimal Dividend: 0.18% yield provides no income cushion during market downturns





Outlook: What to Watch in Coming Quarters





📈 Positive Catalysts



  • Sustained operating margins above 17% validating operational improvements

  • Reduction in promoter pledge levels demonstrating improved financial health

  • ROE improvement towards 12-15% through better asset utilisation

  • Announcement of capacity expansion or second facility to unlock growth

  • Increased institutional participation above 15% indicating conviction




🚨 Red Flags



  • Margin compression below 16% indicating pricing pressure or cost inflation

  • Decline in absolute quarterly profits suggesting one-time nature of Q2 performance

  • Increase in promoter pledge levels or promoter selling

  • Working capital deterioration impacting cash generation

  • Continued underperformance versus hospital sector peers





The path forward for Artemis Medicare depends critically on management's ability to address the return ratio challenge whilst sustaining the positive operational momentum. Investors should monitor quarterly results closely for evidence that the margin expansion is structural rather than cyclical, and that the company can translate revenue growth into proportionate earnings growth without requiring excessive capital deployment.



The promoter pledge situation deserves particular scrutiny. Any increase in pledge levels or signs of financial stress at the promoter level would be a clear sell signal. Conversely, a reduction in pledged shares would remove a significant overhang and could trigger re-rating as governance concerns diminish.



From a valuation perspective, the stock appears fairly valued at current levels, pricing in expectations of continued operational improvement but offering limited margin of safety. The "Attractive" valuation grade suggests the risk-reward is balanced rather than compelling, making this more of a "show me" story than a conviction buy. Investors seeking exposure to India's healthcare growth story may find better risk-adjusted opportunities in larger, more established hospital chains with proven track records of capital efficiency.




The Verdict: Proceed with Caution


SELL

Score: 48/100


For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions at current levels. The combination of weak return ratios, fully pledged promoter stake, and fair valuation creates an unfavourable risk-reward profile. Wait for either a significant correction below ₹240 or concrete evidence of sustained ROE improvement above 12% before considering entry.


For Existing Holders: Consider reducing positions on strength, particularly if the stock approaches ₹290-300 levels. Whilst the recent operational performance is encouraging, the structural concerns around capital efficiency and governance warrant a defensive stance. Hold only if you have high conviction in management's ability to address the return ratio challenge over the next 2-3 years.


Fair Value Estimate: ₹250 (8.77% downside from current levels)





Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)





⚠️ Investment Disclaimer


This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.





{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News