Asahi Songwon Colors Q2 FY26: Margin Pressures Mount as Profitability Slumps 41%

Nov 13 2025 09:16 AM IST
share
Share Via
Asahi Songwon Colors Ltd., a micro-cap dyes and pigments manufacturer with a market capitalisation of ₹303.00 crores, reported consolidated net profit of ₹2.25 crores for Q2 FY26, marking a sharp decline of 28.80% quarter-on-quarter and 41.41% year-on-year. The Ahmedabad-based company's shares have extended their bearish trajectory, trading at ₹257.20 as of November 13, 2025, down 2.17% on the day and now hovering just 4.17% above the 52-week low of ₹246.90.



The quarter's performance reveals mounting operational challenges, with revenue contracting 19.34% sequentially to ₹120.90 crores whilst operating margins compressed to 7.85% from 7.04% in the preceding quarter. The deterioration in profitability metrics, coupled with elevated tax rates and persistent debt servicing costs, paints a concerning picture for a company already grappling with weak return ratios and negative financial momentum.





Consolidated Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

₹2.25 Cr

▼ 41.41% YoY



Net Sales (Q2 FY26)

₹120.90 Cr

▼ 14.62% YoY



Operating Margin (Excl OI)

7.85%

From 9.53% YoY



PAT Margin

1.74%

From 2.33% YoY




The quarter's results underscore a troubling reversal from the company's exceptional performance in Q4 FY25, when net profit had surged 253.70% year-on-year to ₹7.64 crores. That outlier quarter now appears increasingly anomalous as Asahi Songwon reverts to a pattern of subdued profitability that has characterised much of its recent operational history. With the stock down 30.90% over the past year and underperforming its sector by 52.02 percentage points, investor confidence has eroded substantially.



Financial Performance: Revenue Decline Compounds Margin Pressures



Asahi Songwon's Q2 FY26 performance reveals a confluence of top-line and bottom-line pressures. Net sales of ₹120.90 crores represented not only a 19.34% sequential decline from Q1 FY26's ₹149.88 crores but also marked the lowest quarterly revenue figure in the trailing four quarters. Year-on-year, the 14.62% revenue contraction signals deteriorating demand conditions or competitive challenges in the dyes and pigments segment.



Operating profit before depreciation, interest, tax, and other income (PBDIT excluding OI) declined to ₹9.49 crores from ₹10.55 crores quarter-on-quarter, with the operating margin (excluding other income) improving marginally to 7.85% from 7.04% in Q1 FY26. However, this modest margin expansion proved insufficient to offset the revenue decline, resulting in absolute profit deterioration. Year-on-year, operating margins contracted by 168 basis points from 9.53% in Q2 FY25, reflecting persistent cost pressures.





Net Sales (Q2 FY26)

₹120.90 Cr

▼ 19.34% QoQ | ▼ 14.62% YoY



Consolidated Net Profit

₹2.25 Cr

▼ 28.80% QoQ | ▼ 41.41% YoY



Operating Margin (Excl OI)

7.85%

From 7.04% QoQ



PAT Margin

1.74%

From 2.33% YoY




The profit after tax margin compressed to 1.74% in Q2 FY26, down from 3.26% in Q2 FY25, highlighting the earnings quality deterioration. Interest costs of ₹2.85 crores, whilst down from ₹3.14 crores sequentially, continue to consume a meaningful portion of operating profits. Depreciation remained stable at ₹4.69 crores, but the tax rate surged to 41.83% in Q2 FY26 from 38.78% a year earlier, further eroding net profitability.

















































































Metric (₹ Cr) Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 Dec'24 Sep'24 Jun'24
Net Sales 120.90 149.88 152.75 133.72 141.61 134.28
QoQ Growth -19.34% -1.88% +14.23% -5.57% +5.46% +6.60%
Operating Profit (Excl OI) 9.49 10.55 17.06 11.88 13.49 13.75
Margin % 7.85% 7.04% 11.17% 8.88% 9.53% 10.24%
Consolidated Net Profit 2.25 3.16 7.64 3.10 3.84 5.17
QoQ Growth -28.80% -58.64% +146.45% -19.27% -25.73% +139.35%
PAT Margin 1.74% 1.73% 4.50% 1.72% 2.33% 3.26%



A concerning trend emerges when examining the half-yearly performance for H1 FY26. The company reported consolidated net profit of ₹5.41 crores for the six-month period ending September 2025, representing a 39.96% decline from H1 FY25. This deterioration across a longer timeframe suggests structural challenges rather than one-off quarterly volatility.



Operational Challenges: Weak Returns and Elevated Financial Costs



Asahi Songwon's operational metrics reveal fundamental weaknesses that extend beyond cyclical demand fluctuations. The company's return on equity (ROE) of 7.74% for the latest period, whilst showing improvement from the five-year average of 5.67%, remains substantially below industry standards. For a capital-intensive manufacturing business in the specialty chemicals space, such anaemic returns on shareholder capital raise questions about competitive positioning and pricing power.



Return on capital employed (ROCE) stands at 8.99% for the latest period, up from the five-year average of 6.17%, but still reflects inefficient capital deployment. The company's five-year sales growth of 17.36% contrasts sharply with five-year EBIT growth of negative 1.67%, indicating that revenue expansion has not translated into operating profit growth—a clear sign of margin compression and operational deleverage over the medium term.




Critical Operational Concerns


Earnings Quality Under Pressure: Non-operating income comprised 45.71% of profit before tax in Q2 FY26, raising concerns about the sustainability of reported profitability. Core operational earnings remain weak, with profit before tax excluding other income at just ₹1.96 crores—the lowest in recent quarters.


Debt Servicing Burden: Interest coverage (EBIT to Interest) averages just 3.34 times over the past five years, indicating limited cushion for debt servicing. With debt-to-EBITDA averaging 2.58 times and net debt-to-equity at 0.63 times, the company carries moderate leverage that constrains financial flexibility.




The balance sheet reveals a company that has been investing in capacity expansion without commensurate returns. Fixed assets increased to ₹287.41 crores in FY25 from ₹290.38 crores in FY24, whilst long-term debt declined to ₹56.97 crores from ₹69.18 crores. However, current liabilities surged to ₹226.57 crores from ₹217.62 crores, driven by trade payables increasing to ₹110.41 crores from ₹79.59 crores—a 38.76% increase that suggests extended payment cycles and potential working capital stress.



Cash flow from operations for FY25 stood at ₹57.00 crores, a significant improvement from ₹8.00 crores in FY24, driven primarily by favourable working capital changes. However, the company deployed ₹49.00 crores in financing activities during FY25, largely for debt reduction, leaving minimal cash generation for reinvestment or shareholder returns. The dividend payout ratio of just 2.94% reflects management's conservative approach given the strained financial position.



Sector Context: Underperformance Amidst Industry Recovery



Asahi Songwon's struggles stand in stark contrast to the broader dyes and pigments sector's performance. Whilst the sector delivered a 21.12% return over the past year, Asahi Songwon's shares plummeted 30.90%, resulting in underperformance of 52.02 percentage points. This divergence suggests company-specific challenges rather than industry-wide headwinds.



The dyes and pigments industry has benefited from recovering demand in textiles and industrial applications, coupled with China's environmental regulations that have constrained supply from lower-cost producers. However, Asahi Songwon appears unable to capitalise on these favourable industry dynamics, with its market share and competitive positioning evidently under pressure.




Market Position Erosion


With a micro-cap market capitalisation of ₹303.00 crores, Asahi Songwon ranks fifth amongst its peer group in the dyes and pigments sector. The company's price-to-book ratio of 1.22 times trades at a discount to peers such as Sh. Pushkar Chem. (2.24x) and Heubach Colorant (2.02x), reflecting the market's scepticism about the company's asset quality and growth prospects. The valuation discount appears justified given the company's below-average ROE of 5.67% compared to peer averages around 8%.


































































Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE % Debt/Equity Div Yield %
Asahi Songwon 19.19 1.22 5.67% 0.63 0.57%
Sh. Pushkar Chem. 18.12 2.24 10.65% -0.01 0.50%
Heubach Colorant 16.27 2.02 9.62% -0.33
Bhageria Indust. 17.43 1.55 8.24% 0.05 0.74%
Bodal Chemicals 24.55 0.67 4.13% 0.79
Poddar Pigments 15.43 0.75 7.68% -0.14 1.54%



Asahi Songwon's P/E ratio of 19.19 times trails the industry average of 35 times, but this apparent valuation discount masks fundamental weaknesses. The company's ROE of 5.67% lags significantly behind better-capitalised peers like Sh. Pushkar Chem. (10.65%) and Heubach Colorant (9.62%). Moreover, Asahi Songwon's debt-to-equity ratio of 0.63 times places it amongst the more leveraged players in the peer group, constraining its financial flexibility relative to debt-free competitors.



Valuation Analysis: Attractive Multiples Mask Fundamental Weakness



On traditional valuation metrics, Asahi Songwon appears attractively priced. The stock trades at a P/E ratio of 19.19 times trailing twelve-month earnings, a substantial discount to the industry P/E of 35 times. The price-to-book ratio of 1.22 times suggests the market values the company's net assets at only a modest premium, whilst the EV/EBITDA multiple of 9.62 times appears reasonable for a specialty chemicals manufacturer.



However, these headline valuation metrics warrant scepticism given the deteriorating quality of earnings and negative financial trends. The company's PEG ratio of 0.34 would typically signal an attractive growth-adjusted valuation, but this metric loses relevance when five-year EBIT growth stands at negative 1.67%. The dividend yield of 0.57% provides minimal income support for investors enduring capital losses.





P/E Ratio (TTM)

19.19x

vs Industry 35x



Price to Book Value

1.22x

Book Value: ₹216.37



EV/EBITDA

9.62x

Moderate Multiple



Dividend Yield

0.57%

₹1.50 per share




The stock's 52-week price range of ₹246.90 to ₹483.25 illustrates the violent sentiment swings that have characterised trading over the past year. Currently trading at ₹257.20, the stock sits just 4.17% above its 52-week low and 46.78% below its 52-week high—a reflection of the market's reassessment of the company's prospects following the exceptional Q4 FY25 results that now appear unsustainable.



Asahi Songwon's valuation grade has oscillated between "Attractive" and "Very Attractive" in recent months, currently standing at "Attractive." However, this assessment appears overly optimistic given the deteriorating operational fundamentals and negative financial trends. A value trap emerges when low multiples reflect justified concerns about earnings quality and growth prospects rather than genuine investment opportunities.



Shareholding Pattern: Promoter Stability Amidst Institutional Absence



Asahi Songwon's shareholding structure reveals a promoter-dominated company with negligible institutional participation. Promoter holding stood at 67.00% as of September 2025, up marginally from 66.83% in the preceding quarters, indicating modest open market purchases. The Mrugesh Jaykrishna Family Trust-I and Gokul M Jaykrishna Family Trust hold 43.93% and 22.47% respectively, ensuring consolidated family control.

























































Shareholder Category Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 Dec'24 QoQ Change
Promoter Holding 67.00% 66.83% 66.83% 66.83% +0.17%
FII Holding 0.08% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% +0.08%
Mutual Fund Holding 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Other DII Holdings 0.03% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% +0.03%
Non-Institutional 32.89% 33.17% 33.17% 33.17% -0.28%



The complete absence of mutual fund holdings and negligible FII participation (0.08%) signals institutional investors' lack of conviction in the company's prospects. Institutional holdings total just 0.11%, amongst the lowest in the peer group, depriving the stock of the liquidity and research coverage that typically accompanies institutional interest. The marginal increase in FII and DII holdings in Q2 FY26 appears inconsequential given the minuscule absolute stakes.



Non-institutional investors hold 32.89% of equity, down from 33.17% in the preceding quarter, suggesting retail shareholders are gradually reducing exposure. The absence of promoter pledging provides some comfort regarding financial stress at the promoter level, but the lack of institutional validation raises concerns about information asymmetry and corporate governance standards.



Stock Performance: Sustained Underperformance Across All Timeframes



Asahi Songwon's stock performance has been dismal across virtually all timeframes, with the shares generating negative alpha relative to the Sensex across one-day, one-week, one-month, three-month, six-month, year-to-date, one-year, two-year, three-year, four-year, five-year, and ten-year periods. The stock's one-year return of negative 30.90% compares unfavourably with the Sensex's 8.79% gain, resulting in alpha of negative 39.69 percentage points.































































Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week -5.65% +1.45% -7.10%
1 Month -4.92% +2.66% -7.58%
3 Months -18.72% +4.94% -23.66%
6 Months -45.09% +4.15% -49.24%
YTD -30.93% +8.16% -39.09%
1 Year -30.90% +8.79% -39.69%
3 Years -4.88% +36.77% -41.65%
5 Years +13.33% +94.55% -81.22%



The six-month decline of 45.09% represents particularly severe capital destruction, with the stock trading below all key moving averages—5-day (₹265.48), 20-day (₹274.86), 50-day (₹282.48), 100-day (₹333.81), and 200-day (₹343.14). This technical picture confirms a sustained downtrend with no signs of stabilisation.



The stock's beta of 1.50 indicates high volatility relative to the broader market, with annual volatility of 52.12% classifying it as a high-risk investment. The risk-adjusted return of negative 0.59 over the past year compares unfavourably with the Sensex's positive 0.71, confirming that investors have been penalised both in absolute and risk-adjusted terms. The stock's classification as "HIGH RISK LOW RETURN" accurately captures its investment profile.




"With deteriorating fundamentals, bearish technicals, and negative financial trends, Asahi Songwon presents a compelling case for exit despite seemingly attractive valuation multiples."


Technical Analysis: Entrenched Bearish Trend With Limited Support



Asahi Songwon's technical indicators uniformly point to continued weakness. The stock entered a bearish trend on September 11, 2025, at ₹288.95, deteriorating from the prior "Mildly Bearish" classification. All key technical indicators—MACD, Bollinger Bands, KST, and Dow Theory—signal bearish or mildly bearish conditions on both weekly and monthly timeframes.



The immediate support level sits at ₹246.90, the 52-week low, providing minimal cushion from current levels of ₹257.20. Resistance emerges at ₹274.86 (20-day moving average), with major resistance at ₹333.81 (100-day moving average) and ₹343.14 (200-day moving average). The distance to these resistance levels—ranging from 6.87% to 33.41%—suggests substantial overhead supply that would need to be absorbed before any meaningful recovery.



On-balance volume (OBV) indicators show mildly bearish trends on weekly timeframes and mildly bullish on monthly timeframes, suggesting some accumulation at lower levels but insufficient to reverse the prevailing downtrend. Delivery volumes have increased by 213.37% versus the five-day average, indicating heightened selling pressure as longer-term holders exit positions.



Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags Overwhelm Valuation Appeal



Asahi Songwon's investment case rests on a single pillar—attractive valuation multiples—that proves insufficient to offset the overwhelming array of fundamental, financial, and technical concerns. The company's proprietary Mojo score of 23 out of 100 places it firmly in "STRONG SELL" territory, with the rating having deteriorated from "Sell" in late August 2025.





Valuation Grade

Attractive

Low Multiples



Quality Grade

Below Average

Weak Returns



Financial Trend

Negative

Deteriorating



Technical Trend

Bearish

Downtrend Intact




The "Below Average" quality grade reflects the company's weak return ratios, with ROE of 5.67% and ROCE of 6.17% (five-year averages) signalling inefficient capital allocation. The five-year EBIT growth of negative 1.67% confirms that the business model has failed to generate value despite 17.36% sales growth over the same period—a clear indication of persistent margin compression and operational deleverage.



The "Negative" financial trend classification stems from multiple deteriorating metrics in Q2 FY26: net sales at the lowest quarterly level, PBDIT at multi-quarter lows, profit before tax excluding other income at just ₹1.96 crores, and non-operating income comprising 45.71% of profit before tax. The debt-equity ratio, whilst improving to 0.55 times on a half-yearly basis, remains elevated given the weak cash generation profile.



Key Strengths & Risk Factors





KEY STRENGTHS ✓



  • Attractive Valuation: P/E of 19.19x trades at substantial discount to industry average of 35x, whilst P/BV of 1.22x suggests modest premium to book value

  • No Promoter Pledging: Zero pledged shares indicates absence of financial stress at promoter level, reducing governance risks

  • Stable Promoter Holding: Promoter stake of 67.00% provides ownership stability, with marginal increase in recent quarter signalling confidence

  • Improved Debt Position: Long-term debt declined to ₹56.97 crores from ₹69.18 crores year-on-year, reducing financial leverage

  • Positive Operating Cash Flow: FY25 cash flow from operations of ₹57.00 crores represents significant improvement from ₹8.00 crores in FY24




KEY CONCERNS ⚠



  • Collapsing Profitability: Q2 FY26 consolidated net profit of ₹2.25 crores down 41.41% YoY, with H1 FY26 profit declining 39.96%, indicating sustained earnings deterioration

  • Revenue Contraction: Q2 FY26 net sales of ₹120.90 crores marked lowest quarterly revenue, down 14.62% YoY and 19.34% QoQ

  • Margin Compression: Operating margin (excl OI) contracted to 7.85% from 9.53% YoY, whilst PAT margin fell to 1.74% from 2.33%

  • Weak Return Ratios: ROE of 5.67% and ROCE of 6.17% (five-year averages) amongst lowest in peer group, signalling poor capital efficiency

  • Negative EBIT Growth: Five-year EBIT CAGR of negative 1.67% despite 17.36% sales growth indicates persistent operational deleverage

  • Earnings Quality Concerns: Non-operating income comprised 45.71% of PBT in Q2 FY26, raising sustainability questions

  • Institutional Exodus: Total institutional holdings of just 0.11% with zero mutual fund presence signals lack of professional investor confidence





Outlook: Limited Visibility on Recovery Catalysts



Asahi Songwon faces a challenging path ahead with limited near-term catalysts for operational improvement. The company's guidance and management commentary remain absent from publicly available information, leaving investors with minimal visibility on strategic initiatives to address margin pressures and revenue headwinds. The dyes and pigments industry's favourable supply-demand dynamics appear insufficient to benefit a company grappling with company-specific challenges.





POSITIVE CATALYSTS



  • Industry Tailwinds: Sector delivering 21.12% annual returns suggests favourable demand environment that company could potentially capture

  • Valuation Support: Stock trading near 52-week low of ₹246.90 may attract value investors if operational metrics stabilise

  • Debt Reduction: Continued focus on deleveraging could improve financial flexibility and reduce interest burden

  • Working Capital Optimisation: Potential to improve cash conversion cycle given elevated trade payables




RED FLAGS



  • Sustained Revenue Decline: Sequential and year-on-year sales contraction with no indication of demand recovery

  • Margin Deterioration: Persistent compression in operating and PAT margins despite cost control efforts

  • Earnings Quality: High dependence on non-operating income for reported profitability

  • Technical Breakdown: Stock trading below all moving averages with bearish indicators across timeframes

  • Institutional Disinterest: Negligible institutional holdings suggests limited research coverage and liquidity





Investors should monitor quarterly revenue trends, operating margin trajectory, and return ratio improvements as key indicators of operational turnaround. Any sustained recovery in net sales above ₹140 crores quarterly, operating margins expanding beyond 10%, and ROE improving above 10% would constitute positive developments. Conversely, further revenue declines below ₹115 crores, margin compression below 7%, or debt increases would signal continued deterioration.




The Verdict: Exit Recommended Despite Valuation Appeal


STRONG SELL

Score: 23/100


For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions. The combination of deteriorating fundamentals, negative financial trends, bearish technical setup, and weak quality metrics overwhelms the apparent valuation discount. Better opportunities exist in the specialty chemicals space with stronger competitive positions and improving operational trends.


For Existing Holders: Consider exiting positions on any technical bounce towards ₹275-280 levels (20-day moving average). The company's inability to translate revenue growth into profit expansion, coupled with sustained underperformance versus peers, suggests structural challenges that require significant time to address. The risk-reward profile remains unfavourable even at current depressed valuations.


Fair Value Estimate: ₹220-230 (14-18% downside), reflecting the company's below-average quality, negative earnings trend, and weak return profile. Current trading price of ₹257.20 offers insufficient margin of safety given the operational headwinds and limited visibility on recovery catalysts.





Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)





⚠️ Investment Disclaimer


This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance does not guarantee future results, and all investments carry risk of loss.





{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News