Ashtasidhhi Industries Q2 FY26: Micro-Cap NBFC Posts Profit Amid Extreme Revenue Volatility

The company's stock, trading at ₹22.17 as of November 14, 2025, has delivered a 31.73% return over the past year, outperforming the Sensex's 8.61% gain by a significant 23.12 percentage points. However, this outperformance masks underlying operational fragility, with revenues swinging wildly between quarters and profitability remaining marginal at best.

Formerly known as Gujarat Investa Limited until a corporate rebranding in August 2022, Ashtasidhhi Industries operates in the NBFC space but demonstrates minimal scale and questionable business momentum. With promoters holding a stable 58.07% stake and zero institutional participation, the company remains firmly in retail investor territory.

Financial Performance: Revenue Volatility Overshadows Profit Recovery

The Q2 FY26 results present a troubling picture of inconsistency. Net sales plummeted to ₹0.18 crores from ₹1.49 crores in Q1 FY26, representing an alarming 87.92% quarter-on-quarter decline. On a year-on-year basis, revenues contracted 55.00% from ₹0.40 crores in Q2 FY25. This extreme volatility suggests either a project-based revenue model with lumpy income recognition or fundamental challenges in generating consistent business flow.

Despite the revenue collapse, the company managed to post a positive operating margin of 5.56% in Q2 FY26, a significant improvement from the negative 1.34% margin in Q1 FY26. This margin recovery appears largely driven by minimal employee costs (₹0.02 crores) and negligible interest expenses, suggesting an extremely lean operational structure. However, the PAT margin of 5.56% on such a small revenue base translates to absolute profits that barely register on any meaningful scale.

The balance sheet as of March 2025 shows shareholder funds of ₹10.20 crores, comprising ₹7.51 crores in share capital and ₹2.69 crores in reserves. With zero long-term debt and current liabilities of just ₹0.44 crores, the company maintains a conservative capital structure. However, investments of ₹7.19 crores dominate the asset side, raising questions about the nature and productivity of these holdings in an NBFC that generates minimal operating income.

Operational Challenges: Weak Capital Efficiency and Minimal Scale

The most glaring concern for Ashtasidhhi Industries lies in its abysmal capital efficiency metrics. The company's average return on equity (ROE) stands at a meagre 0.88%, whilst the latest ROE figure has turned negative at -0.20%. For context, healthy NBFCs typically generate ROE in the range of 15-20%, making Ashtasidhhi's performance exceptionally weak. This suggests that the company's ₹10.20 crores of shareholder capital is generating virtually no meaningful returns for investors.

The return on capital employed (ROCE) paints an equally dismal picture at just 0.10%, indicating that the company's total capital base is being deployed with minimal productive efficiency. With five-year EBIT growth at negative 7.97%, the company appears to be moving backwards rather than building a sustainable earnings trajectory. The five-year sales growth of 26.35% provides little comfort when absolute revenue figures remain in the sub-crore range with wild quarterly fluctuations.

The company's balance sheet structure reveals a passive investment approach rather than active lending operations typical of NBFCs. With ₹7.19 crores locked in investments and minimal current assets of ₹3.45 crores, the business model appears more akin to an investment holding company than an active financial services provider. This asset allocation strategy, combined with negligible interest income generation, explains the persistently weak profitability and return metrics.

NBFC Sector Context: A Micro-Cap Outlier in a Growing Industry

The broader NBFC sector has delivered a 24.69% return over the past year, driven by robust credit demand, improving asset quality, and favourable regulatory developments. Ashtasidhhi Industries' 31.73% one-year return outpaces this sector average by 7.04 percentage points, but this outperformance appears disconnected from operational fundamentals. Instead, it likely reflects low-float volatility typical of micro-cap stocks with minimal institutional participation and thin trading volumes.

The company's positioning within the NBFC universe is marginal at best. With a market capitalisation of just ₹16.00 crores, it ranks as the fourth-largest amongst its immediate peer group of micro-cap NBFCs. However, this peer group itself comprises companies that fail to meet minimum quality or scale thresholds for serious institutional consideration. The complete absence of FII, mutual fund, insurance, and DII holdings (all at 0.00%) underscores the company's irrelevance to professional investors.

Peer Comparison: Weakest ROE, Highest Valuation

A comparison with micro-cap NBFC peers reveals Ashtasidhhi's unfavourable positioning across key metrics. Despite having one of the weakest ROE figures in its peer group at 0.88%, the company trades at the highest price-to-book value multiple of 1.60x. This valuation premium lacks fundamental justification given the company's operational performance.

United Credit, with an ROE of 3.58%, trades at a P/BV of just 0.55x, whilst Rander Corporation with 2.58% ROE commands a 0.67x multiple. Ashtasidhhi's 1.60x P/BV ratio appears unjustifiably expensive given its inferior profitability metrics. The zero debt position provides some comfort on financial risk, but this conservative leverage also limits the company's ability to scale operations and improve returns through financial engineering.

Valuation Analysis: Expensive for Quality Delivered

At the current price of ₹22.17, Ashtasidhhi Industries trades at a price-to-book value of 1.60x against a book value per share of ₹13.58. For a company with near-zero ROE and minimal earnings power, this represents a significant valuation premium. The stock's valuation grade has oscillated between "Risky" and "Very Expensive" over recent months, with the current assessment at "Risky" as of October 15, 2025.

The absence of a meaningful P/E ratio (shown as "NA - Loss Making") reflects the company's inability to generate consistent, positive earnings. With negligible dividend yield and no earnings visibility, traditional valuation metrics offer little support for the current price. The EV/EBITDA multiple of negative 16.26x further highlights the distorted valuation picture created by minimal profitability.

The stock trades 19.44% below its 52-week high of ₹27.52 but remains 81.42% above its 52-week low of ₹12.22. This wide trading range over the past year reflects the speculative nature of the stock, with price movements driven more by low-float dynamics than fundamental developments. The current price offers no margin of safety given the weak underlying business economics.

Shareholding Pattern: Stable Promoter Base, Zero Institutional Interest

The shareholding structure of Ashtasidhhi Industries has remained remarkably stable over the past five quarters, with promoter holding locked at 58.07% and no sequential changes. The promoter group, led by Anjani R Agarwal (24.91%) and Anshu Anjani Agarwal (22.77%), maintains majority control with no pledging of shares, which provides some governance comfort.

However, the complete absence of institutional participation tells a more concerning story. With zero holdings from FIIs, mutual funds, insurance companies, and other domestic institutional investors, the stock remains firmly in retail and promoter hands. This lack of institutional validation reflects professional investors' assessment of the company's weak fundamentals, minimal scale, and questionable investment merit.

The 41.93% non-institutional shareholding has also remained static, suggesting limited trading activity and poor liquidity. The November 14 trading session saw just one share change hands, highlighting the illiquid nature of this micro-cap stock. For investors, this illiquidity poses significant exit risks, particularly during periods of market stress or negative news flow.

Stock Performance: Volatile Gains Mask Operational Weakness

Ashtasidhhi Industries' stock has delivered strong returns across multiple timeframes, but these gains appear disconnected from operational fundamentals. The stock returned 31.73% over the past year, significantly outperforming the Sensex's 8.61% gain with an alpha of 23.12 percentage points. Over two years, the stock has surged 112.97% compared to the Sensex's 29.76%, generating an impressive 83.21% alpha.

However, this outperformance must be viewed through the lens of extreme volatility and minimal liquidity. The stock's beta of 1.50 indicates significantly higher volatility than the broader market, whilst the three-month return of 58.36% followed by a one-month decline of 1.64% illustrates the erratic price behaviour. With a volatility of 65.07%, the stock falls firmly into the "high risk, high return" category, unsuitable for conservative investors.

The risk-adjusted return of 0.49 over one year compares unfavourably to the Sensex's 0.70, suggesting that the absolute returns have come at the cost of disproportionate risk. Technical indicators show a bullish trend as of November 11, 2025, with the stock trading above all key moving averages. However, this technical strength appears fragile given the underlying operational challenges and minimal trading volumes.

Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags Outweigh Technical Momentum

The investment case for Ashtasidhhi Industries rests on shaky foundations. The company's proprietary Mojo Score of 46 out of 100 results in a "SELL" rating, reflecting concerns across multiple parameters. The quality assessment grades the company as "Below Average," highlighting weak long-term financial performance with an average ROE of just 0.88%.

Whilst the near-term financial trend turned positive in Q2 FY26 and technical indicators show bullish momentum, these positives are overwhelmed by structural concerns. The "Risky" valuation grade, combined with below-average quality and minimal institutional interest, creates a challenging risk-reward profile. The company's inability to generate consistent revenues or meaningful returns on capital raises fundamental questions about business viability.

Key Strengths & Risk Factors

Outlook: What to Watch