Baid Finserv Q3 FY26: Steady Growth Masks Structural Profitability Concerns

Whilst the company continues to post incremental revenue gains—net sales reached ₹24.63 crores in Q3 FY26, up 3.31% QoQ and 15.42% YoY—persistent profitability challenges and a weak return on equity of 6.68% raise questions about the sustainability of shareholder value creation. The company's SELL rating (score: 43/100) reflects concerns over long-term fundamental strength despite attractive valuation multiples.

The December quarter results reveal a company navigating a delicate balance between topline expansion and margin preservation. Whilst net sales have grown steadily across recent quarters, the profitability trajectory remains uneven, with PAT margins oscillating between 9.99% and 22.16% over the past seven quarters. This volatility underscores operational inconsistencies that merit close scrutiny from investors.

Financial Performance: Incremental Gains Amid Margin Compression

Baid Finserv's Q3 FY26 financial performance presents a mixed picture. Net sales of ₹24.63 crores marked the highest quarterly revenue in the company's recent history, advancing 3.31% sequentially from ₹23.84 crores in Q2 FY26. On a year-on-year basis, the 15.42% growth demonstrates sustained momentum in the company's lending operations, though the absolute scale remains modest for an NBFC with a ₹180.00 crore market capitalisation.

Net profit reached ₹4.75 crores in Q3 FY26, up marginally from ₹4.55 crores in the previous quarter. Whilst this represents the highest quarterly PAT since December 2024, the 0.42% year-on-year growth is anaemic, particularly when juxtaposed against the 15.42% revenue expansion. This divergence points to margin pressures that have constrained profitability despite topline growth.

Operating profit before depreciation, interest, and tax (excluding other income) stood at ₹13.79 crores, yielding a margin of 55.99%—down sharply from 59.27% in Q2 FY26 and 64.39% in Q3 FY25. This 330-basis-point sequential decline and 840-basis-point year-on-year contraction signals rising operational costs that are eroding the company's gross profitability.

Interest expenses climbed to ₹8.18 crores in Q3 FY26 from ₹7.99 crores in Q2 FY26, reflecting a 2.38% sequential increase. This uptick in borrowing costs, coupled with stable depreciation at ₹0.25 crores, compressed profit before tax to ₹6.46 crores. The effective tax rate of 26.47% was marginally higher than the 25.16% recorded in Q2 FY26, further limiting net profit expansion.

The PAT margin of 19.29% in Q3 FY26, whilst showing a modest 20-basis-point sequential improvement from 19.09% in Q2 FY26, remains well below the 22.16% achieved in Q3 FY25. This year-on-year margin compression of nearly 290 basis points underscores the structural profitability challenges facing the company. For the full year FY25, Baid Finserv posted a PAT margin of 16.00%, suggesting that recent quarterly margins represent a slight improvement from the annual baseline but remain vulnerable to cost pressures.

Operational Challenges: Weak ROE and Capital Efficiency Concerns

The most glaring weakness in Baid Finserv's investment case is its anaemic return on equity. At 6.68% on average and 9.46% for the latest reported period, the company's ROE falls significantly short of industry benchmarks and investor expectations for NBFCs. Higher ROE is a hallmark of capital efficiency and profitability—metrics that directly influence shareholder wealth creation. Baid Finserv's sub-10% ROE suggests that the company is struggling to generate adequate returns on the capital entrusted to it by shareholders.

This weak ROE is compounded by a return on capital employed (ROCE) of just 11.20%, indicating that the company's overall capital productivity remains lacklustre. For context, healthy NBFCs typically deliver ROEs in the mid-to-high teens, with best-in-class players exceeding 20%. Baid Finserv's current performance places it in the bottom quartile of the sector, raising questions about management's ability to deploy capital effectively.

The company's balance sheet reveals a shareholder equity base of ₹179.03 crores as of March 2025, supported by share capital of ₹24.01 crores and reserves of ₹155.02 crores. With no long-term debt on the books, Baid Finserv maintains a conservative leverage profile—a positive attribute in isolation. However, the absence of debt-fuelled growth strategies may also reflect limited access to capital or a cautious management approach that prioritises safety over expansion.

Current liabilities stood at ₹280.98 crores, representing short-term borrowings and operational obligations. The company's fixed asset base of ₹5.25 crores and current assets of ₹36.64 crores suggest a relatively lean operational infrastructure. Investments remain at nil, indicating that the company is not diversifying its asset base beyond its core lending operations.

Asset Quality and Growth Balance: Navigating NBFC Fundamentals

For an NBFC, asset quality and disbursement growth are twin pillars of sustainable performance. Whilst Baid Finserv has demonstrated consistent revenue expansion—net sales grew at a 10.39% CAGR over the past five years—the quality of this growth remains under scrutiny. The company's 5-year EBIT growth of 7.91% lags behind its sales CAGR, pointing to margin erosion over the medium term.

The company's net debt-to-equity ratio of 1.43 indicates moderate leverage, though this metric has fluctuated in recent years. For FY25, cash flow from operations turned positive at ₹1.00 crore after a negative ₹21.00 crores in FY24, suggesting improved working capital management. However, the cash flow statement reveals volatility, with sharp swings in working capital changes (₹-42.00 crores in FY25 vs ₹-59.00 crores in FY24) that underscore the lumpy nature of the company's business.

Employee costs rose to ₹2.58 crores in Q3 FY26 from ₹2.38 crores in Q2 FY26, a sequential increase of 8.40%. On a year-on-year basis, employee expenses declined 5.84% from ₹2.74 crores in Q3 FY25, suggesting some rationalisation of the workforce or compensation structure. For the full year FY25, employee costs totalled ₹9.00 crores, up 50% from ₹6.00 crores in FY24, indicating a period of headcount expansion that may now be stabilising.

Peer Comparison: Underperformance on Key Metrics

Baid Finserv's competitive positioning within the NBFC sector reveals significant gaps relative to peers. With a price-to-earnings ratio of 10.64x, the stock trades at a substantial discount to the industry average of 23x, reflecting investor scepticism about the company's growth prospects and profitability profile. This valuation gap is not unwarranted—Baid Finserv's ROE of 6.68% lags behind peers such as P. H. Capital (22.33%) and Sangam Finserv (5.60%), though it marginally exceeds Jhaveri Credits (3.87%).

The price-to-book value ratio of 1.01x for Baid Finserv is the lowest among its peer group, suggesting that the market is assigning minimal premium to the company's book value. This stands in stark contrast to P. H. Capital (2.90x) and Jhaveri Credits (2.08x), which command higher multiples despite mixed profitability profiles. Baid Finserv's dividend yield of 0.67% is the highest in the group, offering a modest income stream for investors, though this is unlikely to compensate for the capital appreciation shortfall.

The company's debt-to-equity ratio of 1.43 is higher than most peers, with Jhaveri Credits, P. H. Capital, and Paul Merchants maintaining near-zero leverage. This suggests that Baid Finserv is more reliant on borrowed capital to fund operations, which could amplify financial risk during periods of economic stress or rising interest rates.

Valuation Analysis: Attractive Entry Point or Value Trap?

At a current market price of ₹12.01, Baid Finserv trades at a P/E ratio of 10.64x, well below the industry median of 23x. The stock's price-to-book value of 1.01x implies that investors are paying roughly the net asset value of the company, with little premium for future growth or profitability. Whilst this might appear to represent an attractive entry point on a relative basis, the underlying fundamentals suggest caution.

The company's EV/EBITDA multiple of 7.79x and EV/Sales ratio of 4.61x are modest by NBFC standards, reflecting the market's conservative assessment of the company's earnings power. The PEG ratio of 0.26x—calculated by dividing the P/E ratio by the earnings growth rate—suggests that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth trajectory. However, this metric can be misleading when earnings growth is volatile or unsustainable, as appears to be the case with Baid Finserv.

The stock's 52-week range of ₹8.91 to ₹13.87 places the current price just 34.79% above the low and 13.41% below the high. This proximity to the lower end of the range reflects sustained selling pressure and limited investor enthusiasm. The valuation grade of "Very Attractive" assigned by proprietary models should be interpreted with caution—low valuations can persist when fundamental performance fails to improve.

Shareholding Pattern: Promoter Stake Increase Signals Confidence

One of the few positive developments in Baid Finserv's recent corporate actions is the substantial increase in promoter holdings. Promoter stake surged to 45.71% in Q3 FY26 from 36.25% in Q2 FY26, marking a significant 9.46 percentage point sequential increase. This move suggests that the promoter group is demonstrating confidence in the company's prospects by increasing their skin in the game.

Foreign institutional investor (FII) holdings declined marginally to 0.21% in Q3 FY26 from 0.26% in Q2 FY26, continuing a gradual downward trend from 0.29% in Q1 FY26. The absence of mutual fund and insurance company participation (both at 0.00%) is notable, as it reflects a lack of institutional validation for the company's investment case. Non-institutional holdings correspondingly fell to 54.09% from 63.49%, as the promoter group absorbed the available float.

The promoter group is notably diversified, with holdings spread across 20 entities including Carewell Builders Private Limited (7.04%), Dream Realmart Private Limited (4.60%), and Mahendra Kumar Baid (4.44%). Importantly, there is no pledging of promoter shares, eliminating concerns about forced selling or margin calls during market downturns.

Stock Performance: Severe Underperformance Over Medium to Long Term

Baid Finserv's stock performance has been dismal across most time horizons, with the exception of the very long term. Over the past year, the stock has gained a meagre 2.92%, significantly underperforming the Sensex's 9.01% return and generating a negative alpha of 6.09%. This underperformance is even more pronounced when compared to the NBFC sector, which delivered a 23.56% return over the same period—leaving Baid Finserv trailing by 20.64 percentage points.

The two-year and three-year returns paint an even grimmer picture, with the stock plummeting 57.21% and 62.63% respectively, whilst the Sensex posted positive returns of 17.71% and 38.88%. This represents a staggering negative alpha of 74.92% over two years and 101.51% over three years, indicating that the stock has destroyed shareholder value on a massive scale during this period.

Interestingly, the five-year return of 303.88% suggests that early investors who held through the volatility were handsomely rewarded, with the stock outperforming the Sensex by 239.63 percentage points. However, this long-term outperformance appears to have been driven by a sharp rally in earlier years, which has since reversed. The 10-year return of 191.03%, whilst positive, underperforms the Sensex's 254.70% gain by 63.67 percentage points.

Recent momentum has been marginally positive, with the stock gaining 13.52% over the past month and 16.66% over three months, both significantly outpacing the Sensex. This short-term bounce may reflect technical oversold conditions or speculative interest, but it does not alter the fundamental weaknesses that continue to plague the company.

Investment Thesis: Valuation Attractiveness Cannot Offset Fundamental Weakness

Baid Finserv's investment thesis rests on a precarious foundation. On one hand, the stock trades at attractive valuation multiples—10.64x P/E and 1.01x P/BV—that suggest significant downside protection. The company's balance sheet is conservatively leveraged with no long-term debt, and the recent surge in promoter holdings to 45.71% signals insider confidence. The financial trend is classified as "Positive," with quarterly net sales and PAT both reaching recent highs in Q3 FY26.

On the other hand, these positives are overshadowed by critical structural weaknesses. The company's average ROE of 6.68% is unacceptably low for an NBFC, indicating poor capital efficiency and limited wealth creation potential. The quality grade of "Below Average" reflects long-term underperformance on key financial metrics, including 5-year EBIT growth of just 7.91% and minimal institutional participation (0.21%). The technical trend is "Sideways," offering no momentum support, and the stock has delivered catastrophic negative alpha over two and three-year periods.

The company's Mojo score of 43/100 places it firmly in the "SELL" category, with the recommendation to "consider selling" and "look for exit opportunities." This rating reflects the preponderance of evidence suggesting that Baid Finserv is unlikely to deliver satisfactory risk-adjusted returns for investors, despite its low valuation. The stock's high beta of 1.50 indicates elevated volatility, with a risk-adjusted return of just 0.06 over the past year—far below the Sensex's 0.78.

Key Strengths & Risk Factors

Outlook: What to Watch