Chennai Ferrous Industries Q2 FY26: Quarterly Loss Raises Concerns Despite Strong Historical Returns

Nov 13 2025 09:31 AM IST
share
Share Via
Chennai Ferrous Industries Ltd., a micro-cap non-ferrous metals trading company with a market capitalisation of ₹43.24 crores, has reported a net loss of ₹0.14 crores for Q2 FY26, marking a sharp reversal from the ₹2.33 crores profit posted in the previous quarter. The stock tumbled 5.55% to ₹119.95 following the results announcement, reflecting investor disappointment over the company's inability to sustain profitability amidst challenging operating conditions.





Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

-₹0.14 Cr

↓ 114.4% QoQ



Revenue (Q2 FY26)

₹56.51 Cr

↓ 18.35% QoQ



Operating Margin

-0.32%

Lowest in 8 quarters



Return on Equity

21.36%

Average basis




The quarter-on-quarter decline represents a concerning deterioration in operational performance, with the company sliding into negative territory across key profitability metrics. Net sales contracted 18.35% sequentially to ₹56.51 crores, whilst operating profit before depreciation, interest, and tax (PBDIT) excluding other income turned negative at ₹-0.18 crores compared to ₹3.13 crores in Q1 FY26. This marks the company's weakest quarterly performance in recent history, raising questions about the sustainability of its coal and iron trading business model.



Year-on-year comparisons paint an equally troubling picture, with revenue declining 17.61% from ₹68.59 crores in Q2 FY25, whilst net profit swung from a positive ₹0.97 crores to the current loss. The company's profit after tax (PAT) margin compressed to -0.25% from 3.37% in the previous quarter, reflecting severe margin pressures in the non-ferrous metals trading segment.





































































Quarter Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 Dec'24 Sep'24 Jun'24 Mar'24
Net Sales (₹ Cr) 56.51 69.21 57.32 21.05 68.59 73.82 19.56
QoQ Growth -18.35% +20.74% +172.30% -69.31% -7.08% +277.40%
Net Profit (₹ Cr) -0.14 2.33 0.19 1.12 0.97 1.74 1.06
Operating Margin -0.32% 4.52% 0.61% 8.36% 2.27% 3.16% 7.36%
PAT Margin -0.25% 3.37% 0.33% 5.32% 1.41% 2.36% 5.42%



Financial Performance: Margin Collapse Drives Quarterly Loss



The company's financial performance in Q2 FY26 represents a dramatic reversal from the previous quarter's robust showing. Revenue declined 18.35% quarter-on-quarter to ₹56.51 crores, whilst operating profit before depreciation, interest, and tax (excluding other income) collapsed to ₹-0.18 crores from ₹3.13 crores, marking the lowest level recorded in the past eight quarters. This operational loss translated into a negative operating margin of -0.32%, a stark contrast to the 4.52% margin achieved just one quarter earlier.



The margin compression appears to be driven by a combination of factors including adverse pricing dynamics in the coal and iron trading business, potential inventory losses, and elevated operating expenses relative to revenue generation. Employee costs remained relatively stable at ₹0.68 crores, suggesting the margin pressure stemmed primarily from gross profit deterioration rather than overhead expansion. The company's profit before tax (excluding other income) turned negative at ₹-0.44 crores, the lowest figure on record for the available quarterly data.





Revenue (Q2 FY26)

₹56.51 Cr

↓ 18.35% QoQ | ↓ 17.61% YoY



Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

-₹0.14 Cr

↓ 114.4% QoQ



Operating Margin

-0.32%

vs 4.52% in Q1 FY26



PAT Margin

-0.25%

vs 3.37% in Q1 FY26




Interestingly, other income provided a modest cushion at ₹0.25 crores, preventing an even steeper loss. However, this non-operating income proved insufficient to offset the operational challenges, with the company ultimately posting a net loss of ₹0.14 crores after accounting for depreciation of ₹0.26 crores and a tax credit of ₹0.05 crores. The tax credit suggests the company may be able to carry forward losses for future offset, though this provides little comfort to investors focused on near-term profitability restoration.



The year-on-year comparison reveals similar concerns, with revenue declining 17.61% from ₹68.59 crores in Q2 FY25, whilst the company swung from a profit of ₹0.97 crores to the current loss. This deterioration occurred despite the company maintaining a relatively asset-light balance sheet with minimal debt obligations, suggesting the challenges are fundamentally operational rather than financial structure-related.




Critical Concern: Operational Loss Territory


Chennai Ferrous has slipped into operating losses for Q2 FY26, with PBDIT (excluding other income) at ₹-0.18 crores—the lowest level in eight quarters. The negative operating margin of -0.32% indicates the company is losing money on its core trading activities before accounting for depreciation and taxes. This represents a significant deterioration from the consistent profitability demonstrated in previous quarters and raises questions about pricing power, inventory management, and the competitive dynamics in the coal and iron trading segments.




Balance Sheet Quality: Strong Foundation Amidst Operational Struggles



Despite the challenging quarterly performance, Chennai Ferrous maintains a reasonably healthy balance sheet that provides some cushion against near-term operational headwinds. As of March 2025, the company reported shareholder funds of ₹52.05 crores, comprising share capital of ₹3.60 crores and reserves of ₹48.45 crores. The company operates with zero long-term debt, positioning it as a net cash entity—a significant positive in an environment where many small-cap companies struggle with leverage-related challenges.



The company's return on equity (ROE) averaged a respectable 21.36% over the measurement period, indicating efficient capital utilisation when operations are functioning normally. However, the latest quarterly loss will inevitably pressure this metric going forward. The company's return on capital employed (ROCE) averaged -14.82%, reflecting the recent operational challenges and suggesting capital efficiency has been compromised by the trading business's volatility.



Current assets stood at ₹47.86 crores as of March 2025, providing adequate liquidity coverage against current liabilities of ₹25.99 crores. Trade payables increased significantly to ₹22.06 crores from ₹10.10 crores in the previous year, potentially indicating extended payment terms negotiated with suppliers or slower inventory turnover. Fixed assets declined modestly to ₹31.82 crores from ₹33.21 crores, reflecting ongoing depreciation without significant capital expenditure.




Key Insight: Zero-Debt Capital Structure


Chennai Ferrous operates with zero long-term debt and minimal interest obligations, providing financial flexibility during operational downturns. The company's net debt-to-equity ratio of -0.01 indicates it is a net cash company, with cash and liquid investments exceeding any borrowings. This conservative financial structure reduces financial risk but also suggests the company may not be optimising its capital structure for growth opportunities in the commodity trading space.




Trading Business Volatility: Navigating Commodity Price Swings



Chennai Ferrous Industries' transition from sponge iron manufacturing to coal and iron trading has exposed the company to significant commodity price volatility and demand-supply imbalances. The company's quarterly results demonstrate extreme variability, with revenue swinging from ₹19.56 crores in March 2024 to ₹73.82 crores in June 2024, before declining to the current ₹56.51 crores. This volatility reflects the inherent challenges of operating in commodity trading, where margins can compress rapidly during periods of oversupply or weak demand.



The company's operating margin history illustrates this volatility starkly. In December 2024, the company achieved an impressive 8.36% operating margin, only to see it collapse to -0.32% by September 2025. Such dramatic swings suggest the company may lack pricing power or hedging mechanisms to protect against adverse commodity price movements. The trading business model, whilst asset-light, requires sophisticated risk management capabilities that may be challenging for a micro-cap entity to develop and maintain.



On an annual basis, the company has demonstrated growth, with FY25 revenue reaching ₹222.00 crores—a 58.6% increase from ₹140.00 crores in FY24. However, this growth has not translated into proportionate profitability expansion, with net profit reaching only ₹4.00 crores in FY25 compared to ₹2.00 crores in FY24. The company's historical operating margins have declined significantly from 57.1% in FY20 (when it was still manufacturing sponge iron) to just 1.8% in FY25 under the trading model, highlighting the lower-margin nature of the current business.

































































Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE % Debt/Equity Dividend Yield
Chennai Ferrous 9.93 0.88 21.36% -0.01 NA
Sudal Industries 15.22 2.66 4.58% 0.77 NA
Palco Metals 14.81 5.23 14.19% 1.49 NA
Sacheta Metals 25.64 1.07 5.25% 0.27 1.81%
Sampat Aluminium 8.02 2.47 0.0% 0.00 NA
Nanavati Venture 227.41 2.33 0.92% 0.00 NA



Chennai Ferrous trades at a P/E multiple of 9.93x based on trailing twelve-month earnings, representing a significant discount to the sector average of approximately 31x. The company's price-to-book ratio of 0.88x suggests the market values the company below its net asset value, potentially reflecting concerns about earnings quality and sustainability. Despite the valuation discount, the company's superior ROE of 21.36% compared to most peers (ranging from 0.92% to 14.19%) indicates stronger historical capital efficiency, though this advantage is now under threat from the recent quarterly loss.



Valuation Analysis: Attractive Entry Point or Value Trap?



At the current market price of ₹119.95, Chennai Ferrous Industries trades at compelling valuation multiples that appear attractive on the surface. The stock's P/E ratio of 9.93x represents a substantial 68% discount to the non-ferrous metals sector average of 31x, whilst the price-to-book ratio of 0.88x suggests the market is valuing the company below its stated net asset value of ₹70.71 per share. The enterprise value-to-EBITDA multiple of 6.90x and EV-to-sales ratio of 0.21x further reinforce the perception of undervaluation relative to historical norms and peer comparisons.



However, these attractive multiples must be viewed through the lens of deteriorating fundamentals and earnings quality concerns. The company's proprietary Mojo Score stands at just 36 out of 100, with a "SELL" recommendation, suggesting the valuation discount may be justified by underlying business challenges. The stock has been assigned an "Attractive" valuation grade, upgraded from "Fair" on October 3, 2025, though this positive assessment contrasts sharply with the "Below Average" quality grade and "Negative" financial trend designation.





P/E Ratio (TTM)

9.93x

68% discount to sector



Price to Book

0.88x

Below net asset value



EV/EBITDA

6.90x

Sector average: ~12x



Mojo Score

36/100

SELL category




The stock's 52-week trading range of ₹100.00 to ₹147.95 provides context for the current price level. At ₹119.95, the stock trades approximately 19% above its 52-week low and 19% below its 52-week high, suggesting it occupies a middle ground that reflects both the valuation discount and the operational concerns. The recent 5.55% single-day decline following the quarterly results indicates the market is reassessing the company's near-term prospects in light of the loss-making quarter.



Historical valuation grade changes reveal a pattern of volatility, with the stock oscillating between "Very Attractive" and "Fair" valuations over recent months. This instability mirrors the underlying business volatility and suggests investors should be cautious about relying solely on valuation metrics when evaluating the investment case. The lack of dividend yield further reduces the margin of safety for value-oriented investors, as there is no income component to cushion potential downside from further operational deterioration.




"At 0.88x book value and 9.93x earnings, Chennai Ferrous appears statistically cheap—but the recent quarterly loss and negative financial trend raise legitimate questions about whether this represents a genuine value opportunity or a value trap awaiting further deterioration."


Shareholding Pattern: Stable Promoter Base With Zero Institutional Interest



Chennai Ferrous Industries' shareholding structure reveals a dominant promoter presence alongside a complete absence of institutional investors, a pattern typical of micro-cap companies operating in niche trading segments. Promoter holdings stood at 67.74% as of September 2025, showing marginal sequential erosion from 67.78% in June 2025 and 67.85% in March 2025. This slight but consistent decline of approximately 0.04% per quarter suggests minimal promoter selling, though the trend warrants monitoring for any acceleration that might signal insider concern about business prospects.

































































Quarter Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 Dec'24 Sep'24
Promoter 67.74% 67.78% 67.85% 67.86% 67.94%
Change -0.04% -0.07% -0.01% -0.08%
FII 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Mutual Funds 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Insurance 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Non-Institutional 32.26% 32.22% 32.15% 32.14% 32.06%



The promoter group is highly fragmented, with no single entity holding more than 10% stake. The largest individual promoter, Avantika Gupta, holds 9.1%, followed by Tamilnadu Property Developers Limited at 8.32% and Tamilnadu Enterprises And Investment Private Limited at 6.99%. This dispersed ownership structure across 21 different promoter entities may complicate decision-making and strategic direction, though it also reduces the risk of concentrated control by a single individual or family.



The complete absence of foreign institutional investors (FIIs), mutual funds, insurance companies, and other domestic institutional investors (DIIs) is particularly noteworthy. Zero institutional holdings suggest the company has failed to attract professional investor interest, likely due to its micro-cap status, limited liquidity, volatile earnings profile, and lack of analyst coverage. The non-institutional shareholding of 32.26% comprises primarily retail investors and high-net-worth individuals, a shareholder base that may lack the sophistication to properly evaluate commodity trading risks.



Positively, the company reports zero promoter pledging, indicating promoters have not leveraged their shareholdings to raise personal financing—a significant comfort factor in the small-cap space where pledged shares often signal financial stress. The gradual increase in non-institutional holdings from 32.06% in September 2024 to 32.26% in September 2025 suggests modest retail accumulation, though the absolute increase of just 0.20% over four quarters indicates limited buying conviction even at current depressed valuations.



Stock Performance: Severe Underperformance Across All Timeframes



Chennai Ferrous Industries' stock price performance presents a tale of two distinct periods: exceptional long-term returns driven by the earlier manufacturing business, and severe recent underperformance reflecting current trading business challenges. The stock has declined 11.67% over the past year, significantly underperforming the Sensex's 9.27% gain and generating negative alpha of -20.94%. This underperformance has intensified in recent periods, with the stock falling 9.27% over the past week and 9.09% over the past month, whilst the broader market posted gains of 1.90% and 3.12% respectively.











































































Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Day -5.55% +0.50% -6.05%
1 Week -9.27% +1.90% -11.17%
1 Month -9.09% +3.12% -12.21%
3 Months +3.27% +5.40% -2.13%
6 Months +0.13% +4.61% -4.48%
1 Year -11.67% +9.27% -20.94%
2 Years -12.83% +30.74% -43.57%
3 Years -29.27% +37.38% -66.65%
5 Years +2435.94% +95.41% +2340.53%
10 Years +1565.97% +231.48% +1334.49%



The medium-term picture is equally concerning, with the stock declining 12.83% over two years and 29.27% over three years, whilst the Sensex advanced 30.74% and 37.38% respectively during these periods. This consistent underperformance has resulted in negative alpha of -43.57% over two years and -66.65% over three years, indicating the stock has destroyed significant shareholder value relative to passive index investment. The stock has also underperformed its sector benchmark, with the non-ferrous metals index gaining 19.26% over the past year compared to Chennai Ferrous' 11.67% decline—a 30.93 percentage point underperformance.



Paradoxically, the stock's long-term returns remain exceptional, with gains of 2,435.94% over five years and 1,565.97% over ten years, vastly outperforming the Sensex's 95.41% and 231.48% returns over the same periods. These extraordinary long-term returns reflect the company's earlier incarnation as a sponge iron manufacturer, when it generated substantially higher margins and more stable earnings. However, these historical gains provide little comfort to investors who entered positions in recent years and have experienced severe capital erosion.



From a risk-adjusted perspective, the stock's performance is particularly troubling. With a beta of 1.50, Chennai Ferrous exhibits 50% higher volatility than the broader market, amplifying both gains and losses. The stock's volatility of 36.56% over the past year—nearly triple the Sensex's 12.33%—combined with negative returns, has resulted in a negative Sharpe ratio, placing it firmly in the "HIGH RISK LOW RETURN" category. The stock currently trades below all major moving averages (5-day, 20-day, 50-day, 100-day, and 200-day), confirming the bearish technical picture.



Investment Thesis: Mixed Signals Across Key Parameters



Chennai Ferrous Industries presents a complex investment proposition characterised by attractive valuation metrics offset by deteriorating fundamentals and persistent underperformance. The company's Mojo Score of 36 out of 100 places it firmly in "SELL" territory (scores between 30-50), reflecting the challenging combination of factors confronting potential investors. The investment thesis must be evaluated across four critical dimensions: near-term drivers, quality assessment, valuation appeal, and overall risk-reward balance.



The near-term drivers present a mixed picture. On the negative side, the quarterly financial trend has turned decidedly negative, with Q2 FY26 marking the company's first quarterly loss in recent history and the lowest operating margin on record at -0.32%. This deterioration is particularly concerning as it represents not merely a slowdown but an actual reversal into loss-making territory, raising questions about the sustainability of the trading business model. However, the technical trend has recently turned "Mildly Bullish" as of November 12, 2025, suggesting some investor optimism about potential stabilisation, though this must be viewed cautiously given the stock's position below all major moving averages.





Valuation Grade

ATTRACTIVE

P/E: 9.93x | P/BV: 0.88x



Quality Grade

BELOW AVERAGE

Weak fundamentals



Financial Trend

NEGATIVE

Q2 FY26 loss



Technical Trend

MILDLY BULLISH

Changed Nov 12




The quality assessment reveals significant weaknesses that cannot be ignored. The company carries a "Below Average" quality grade, reflecting its inconsistent earnings profile, volatile margins, and weak long-term fundamental strength. The average ROCE of -14.82% indicates poor capital efficiency, though this is partially offset by a respectable average ROE of 21.36%. The company's shift from manufacturing to trading has fundamentally altered its business risk profile, replacing stable production margins with volatile trading spreads subject to commodity price fluctuations and demand-supply imbalances.



The valuation dimension represents the strongest component of the investment case, with the stock graded as "Attractive" based on current multiples. Trading at 9.93x trailing earnings and 0.88x book value, the stock appears statistically cheap relative to both its sector peers and historical valuation ranges. The EV/EBITDA multiple of 6.90x and EV/Sales ratio of 0.21x further support the undervaluation thesis. However, investors must question whether these depressed multiples represent a genuine opportunity or a "value trap" where low valuations are justified by deteriorating fundamentals and uncertain earnings visibility.




The Central Dilemma: Value Opportunity or Value Trap?


Chennai Ferrous embodies the classic "value versus quality" investment debate. The stock offers compelling valuation metrics—trading at 68% discount to sector P/E and below book value—but these attractive multiples must be weighed against below-average quality, negative financial trends, and consistent underperformance. The company's zero-debt balance sheet and historical long-term returns provide some comfort, but the recent quarterly loss and volatile trading business model raise legitimate concerns about earnings sustainability and capital preservation.




Key Strengths & Risk Factors





KEY STRENGTHS



  • Zero Debt Capital Structure: Company operates with no long-term debt and negative net debt-to-equity of -0.01, providing financial flexibility during operational downturns

  • Attractive Valuation Multiples: Trading at P/E of 9.93x (68% discount to sector) and P/BV of 0.88x (below net asset value), offering statistical value appeal

  • Strong Historical Returns: Exceptional 5-year (2,435.94%) and 10-year (1,565.97%) returns demonstrate long-term wealth creation capability

  • Efficient Capital Utilisation: Average ROE of 21.36% indicates strong historical capital efficiency when operations normalise

  • Zero Promoter Pledging: No promoter share pledging reduces governance concerns common in small-cap space

  • Stable Promoter Base: Promoter holding of 67.74% with minimal quarterly erosion suggests insider confidence

  • Asset-Light Business Model: Trading business requires minimal fixed capital, reducing depreciation burden and capital intensity




KEY CONCERNS



  • Quarterly Loss Reversal: Q2 FY26 net loss of ₹0.14 crores marks first quarterly loss, with operating margin collapsing to -0.32%

  • Severe Revenue Decline: Sales fell 18.35% QoQ and 17.61% YoY to ₹56.51 crores, indicating demand weakness or market share loss

  • Extreme Earnings Volatility: Quarterly profits swing wildly from ₹2.33 crores to losses, reflecting unstable trading business model

  • Persistent Underperformance: Negative alpha of -20.94% over 1 year and -66.65% over 3 years demonstrates consistent value destruction

  • Zero Institutional Interest: Complete absence of FII, MF, insurance holdings signals lack of professional investor confidence

  • Below Average Quality Grade: Weak long-term fundamental strength and inconsistent operational performance

  • High Volatility Profile: Beta of 1.50 and volatility of 36.56% place stock in "HIGH RISK LOW RETURN" category with negative Sharpe ratio

  • Margin Compression: Operating margins declined from 57.1% (FY20 manufacturing) to 1.8% (FY25 trading), highlighting low-margin business transition

  • Sector Underperformance: 30.93 percentage point underperformance versus non-ferrous metals sector over past year





Outlook: Critical Monitoring Points for Q3 FY26



The outlook for Chennai Ferrous Industries hinges critically on the company's ability to return to profitability in Q3 FY26 and demonstrate that the Q2 loss was an aberration rather than the beginning of a sustained downturn. Investors should focus on several key monitoring points that will determine whether the current valuation discount represents an opportunity or a justified reflection of deteriorating business fundamentals.





POSITIVE CATALYSTS



  • Return to Profitability: Q3 FY26 results showing positive operating margins and net profit restoration

  • Revenue Stabilisation: Sequential revenue growth or at least stabilisation above ₹60 crores quarterly run-rate

  • Margin Recovery: Operating margins returning to 3-5% range demonstrated in earlier quarters

  • Institutional Interest: Entry of mutual funds or other institutional investors signalling professional validation

  • Technical Breakout: Stock moving decisively above ₹130 resistance and 50-day moving average




RED FLAGS TO WATCH



  • Continued Losses: Q3 FY26 reporting another loss or break-even result would confirm structural profitability challenges

  • Further Revenue Decline: Sequential revenue falling below ₹50 crores would indicate accelerating business deterioration

  • Promoter Selling: Acceleration of promoter stake reduction beyond current 0.04% quarterly pace

  • Working Capital Stress: Rising trade payables without corresponding inventory/receivables growth

  • Technical Breakdown: Stock breaking below ₹100 support (52-week low) would signal capitulation





The company's ability to navigate commodity price volatility and maintain positive operating margins will be the critical determinant of investment success. Given the trading business model's inherent volatility, investors should expect quarterly fluctuations but must see evidence of positive average profitability over multi-quarter periods. The complete absence of institutional investors suggests significant information asymmetry and limited analyst coverage, placing greater burden on individual investors to conduct thorough due diligence.



For existing shareholders, the decision to hold or exit depends largely on entry price and risk tolerance. Those who benefited from the extraordinary long-term gains may consider booking profits given the changed business model and recent operational challenges. Fresh investors attracted by the valuation discount should recognise they are essentially speculating on a business turnaround in a highly volatile commodity trading segment—an inherently risky proposition despite the statistical cheapness.




Investment Verdict


SELL

Score: 36/100


For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions despite attractive valuation multiples. The quarterly loss, negative financial trend, and persistent underperformance suggest significant downside risk. The "value trap" risk is substantial—statistically cheap stocks can become cheaper when fundamentals deteriorate. Wait for at least two consecutive quarters of profitable operations before considering entry.


For Existing Holders: Consider reducing positions on any technical bounce above ₹130. The shift from stable manufacturing to volatile trading has fundamentally altered the risk-return profile. Whilst the zero-debt balance sheet provides some cushion, the negative financial trend and below-average quality grade justify profit booking or loss minimisation. Those with long-term holding periods and substantial gains may consider holding a reduced position.


Fair Value Estimate: ₹100-110 (16% downside risk from current levels) based on normalised earnings of ₹3-4 crores annually and 10-12x P/E multiple appropriate for volatile trading businesses. Current price of ₹119.95 does not offer adequate margin of safety given earnings uncertainty.





Note: ROCE = (EBIT - Other Income) / (Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)





⚠️ Investment Disclaimer


This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investments in small-cap and micro-cap stocks carry substantially higher risks including liquidity risk, volatility risk, and business risk compared to large-cap stocks.





{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News
Why is Chennai Ferrous falling/rising?
Nov 26 2025 12:56 AM IST
share
Share Via
Why is Chennai Ferrous falling/rising?
Nov 17 2025 10:03 PM IST
share
Share Via
Is Chennai Ferrous overvalued or undervalued?
Nov 17 2025 08:09 AM IST
share
Share Via
Is Chennai Ferrous overvalued or undervalued?
Nov 16 2025 08:08 AM IST
share
Share Via
Is Chennai Ferrous overvalued or undervalued?
Nov 15 2025 08:09 AM IST
share
Share Via
Is Chennai Ferrous overvalued or undervalued?
Nov 14 2025 08:10 AM IST
share
Share Via
Why is Chennai Ferrous falling/rising?
Nov 13 2025 10:05 PM IST
share
Share Via