Cropster Agro Q3 FY26: Profit Momentum Masks Valuation Concerns

Feb 17 2026 05:09 PM IST
share
Share Via
Cropster Agro Ltd., a micro-cap packaging company with a market capitalisation of ₹1,268 crores, reported its strongest quarterly profit performance in Q3 FY26 with net profit reaching ₹4.21 crores, marking a sequential increase of 2.18% from Q2 FY26 and a robust year-on-year growth of 23.46% from Q3 FY25. However, the stock has struggled significantly, declining 26.64% over the past year and trading at ₹14.90 as of February 17, 2026—down 53.58% from its 52-week high of ₹32.10.
Cropster Agro Q3 FY26: Profit Momentum Masks Valuation Concerns

The company's operational performance shows consistent improvement with revenue growing 2.99% quarter-on-quarter to ₹54.06 crores and 6.84% year-on-year, whilst operating margins expanded to 8.08% from 6.23% in the year-ago quarter. Despite these operational gains, the stock trades at an elevated price-to-earnings ratio of 81x and a price-to-book value of 10.79x, raising serious questions about valuation sustainability in a market where packaging sector peers trade at significantly lower multiples.

Net Profit (Q3 FY26)
₹4.21 Cr
▲ 2.18% QoQ | ▲ 23.46% YoY
Revenue (Q3 FY26)
₹54.06 Cr
▲ 2.99% QoQ | ▲ 6.84% YoY
Operating Margin
8.08%
▲ 185 bps YoY
ROE (Average)
10.45%
Latest: 13.39%

The packaging manufacturer has demonstrated remarkable resilience in its operating performance, with nine-month FY26 revenue reaching ₹157.57 crores compared to ₹138.61 crores in the corresponding period last year. This 13.69% growth trajectory reflects improving demand conditions, though the company operates in a highly competitive packaging sector where margins remain under constant pressure from raw material volatility and pricing competition.

Quarter Revenue (₹ Cr) QoQ Growth Net Profit (₹ Cr) QoQ Growth Operating Margin
Dec'25 (Q3) 54.06 +2.99% 4.21 +2.18% 8.08%
Sep'25 (Q2) 52.49 +2.88% 4.12 +3.78% 8.10%
Jun'25 (Q1) 51.02 -8.39% 3.97 +22.91% 8.06%
Mar'25 (Q4) 55.69 +10.06% 3.23 -5.28% 6.57%
Dec'24 (Q3) 50.60 +6.50% 3.41 +9.65% 6.23%
Sep'24 (Q2) 47.51 +17.31% 3.11 +7.61% 6.44%
Jun'24 (Q1) 40.50 2.89 7.41%

Financial Performance: Steady Margin Expansion Amidst Growth

Cropster Agro's Q3 FY26 results reveal a company successfully navigating the challenges of the packaging industry whilst maintaining profitability discipline. Net sales in Q3 FY26 stood at ₹54.06 crores, representing sequential growth of 2.99% from Q2 FY26's ₹52.49 crores and year-on-year expansion of 6.84% from Q3 FY25's ₹50.60 crores. This consistent revenue progression demonstrates the company's ability to capture market share and expand its customer base in a fragmented industry.

The standout feature of the quarterly performance remains the substantial margin improvement. Operating profit before depreciation, interest, and tax (excluding other income) reached ₹4.37 crores in Q3 FY26, yielding an operating margin of 8.08%—a significant expansion from 6.23% in the year-ago quarter. This 185 basis point margin enhancement reflects improved operational efficiency, better product mix, and potentially favourable raw material cost trends. The company's profit after tax margin similarly improved to 7.79% from 6.74% year-on-year, indicating that the operational gains are flowing through to the bottom line.

On a nine-month basis for FY26, the company generated revenue of ₹157.57 crores with net profit of ₹12.30 crores, translating to a PAT margin of 7.81%. This compares favourably with the full-year FY25 performance, where the company reported revenue of ₹194.00 crores and net profit of ₹12.00 crores. The nine-month FY26 numbers suggest the company is on track to potentially surpass its FY25 annual profit, assuming Q4 FY26 maintains the current momentum.

Revenue (Q3 FY26)
₹54.06 Cr
▲ 2.99% QoQ | ▲ 6.84% YoY
Net Profit (Q3 FY26)
₹4.21 Cr
▲ 2.18% QoQ | ▲ 23.46% YoY
Operating Margin (Excl OI)
8.08%
▲ 185 bps YoY
PAT Margin
7.79%
▲ 105 bps YoY

The quality of earnings deserves scrutiny. The company's tax rate in Q3 FY26 stood at an unusually low 3.66%, down from 11.75% in Q4 FY25 and significantly below the standard corporate tax rate. This low effective tax rate has been a consistent feature across recent quarters, with rates of 3.74% in Q2 FY26 and 3.63% in Q1 FY26. Whilst this enhances reported net profit, investors should recognise that any normalisation of the tax rate to statutory levels would materially impact bottom-line growth going forward. The company's tax ratio over the longer term averages 5.47%, suggesting potential tax benefits or carry-forward losses being utilised.

Balance Sheet Strength: Cash-Rich and Debt-Free

Cropster Agro's balance sheet presents a picture of financial conservatism and capital efficiency. As of March 2025, the company reported shareholder funds of ₹107.93 crores, comprising share capital of ₹84.00 crores and reserves of ₹23.93 crores. The substantial increase in share capital from ₹25.00 crores in March 2024 reflects a significant equity infusion, potentially through a rights issue or preferential allotment, which has strengthened the capital base.

The company operates with negligible debt, with long-term borrowings of merely ₹0.45 crores as of March 2025, resulting in a net debt-to-equity ratio of -0.03—effectively making it a net cash company. This debt-free status is a significant competitive advantage, providing financial flexibility and insulating the company from interest rate volatility. Current assets stood at ₹92.14 crores against current liabilities of ₹3.10 crores, indicating robust liquidity and working capital management.

However, the company's return on capital employed (ROCE) of 6.38% on average and 13.48% in the latest period, whilst improving, remains modest for a company commanding premium valuations. Similarly, the average return on equity (ROE) of 10.45%, though respectable, does not justify the elevated price-to-book multiple of 10.79x at which the stock trades. Higher ROE indicates better capital efficiency and profitability, and whilst Cropster Agro's latest ROE of 13.39% shows improvement, it still lags behind several packaging sector peers.

Working Capital Dynamics: A Cautionary Note

The cash flow statement for FY25 reveals a concerning trend: despite reporting profit before tax of ₹13.00 crores, the company experienced negative cash flow from operations of ₹35.00 crores, primarily driven by a ₹48.00 crores increase in working capital. This was mirrored in FY24 with ₹36.00 crores negative operating cash flow. The company has relied on financing activities (₹36.00 crores inflow in both years) to bridge this gap. Sustained negative operating cash flow despite profitability raises questions about the sustainability of growth and potential working capital inefficiencies that investors should monitor closely.

Industry Context: Navigating a Competitive Landscape

The Indian packaging industry has witnessed robust growth driven by expanding consumption, e-commerce proliferation, and increasing focus on sustainable packaging solutions. However, the sector remains intensely competitive with fragmented players competing on price, quality, and service. Cropster Agro operates in this challenging environment, where maintaining margins requires constant innovation and operational excellence.

The company's five-year sales growth of 220.00% is impressive, though this must be contextualised against a low base. The five-year EBIT growth of 16.89% suggests that whilst top-line expansion has been strong, translating this into proportionate profit growth has proven challenging—a common theme in the capital-intensive packaging industry where scale benefits take time to materialise.

The packaging sector's outlook remains constructive, supported by India's consumption growth story and increasing organised retail penetration. However, raw material price volatility—particularly for polymers and plastics—continues to pose margin pressure risks. Companies that can pass on cost increases to customers whilst maintaining service quality typically outperform, and Cropster Agro's recent margin expansion suggests some success on this front.

Company Market Cap (₹ Cr) P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE (%) Debt/Equity
Cropster Agro 1,268 80.59 10.79 10.45 -0.03
XPRO India 165.48 3.10 16.14 0.07
Jindal Poly Film NA (Loss Making) 0.54 14.07 -0.01
Cosmo First 12.75 1.21 17.89 0.86
Mold-Tek Packaging 26.87 2.73 14.20 0.33
Huhtamaki India 12.23 1.17 6.99 -0.11

Valuation Analysis: Premium Without Justification

Cropster Agro's valuation metrics present the most significant concern for prospective investors. Trading at a price-to-earnings ratio of 80.59x on trailing twelve-month earnings, the stock commands a substantial premium to the packaging sector average of approximately 25x. This premium would typically be justified by superior growth prospects, market leadership, or exceptional return ratios—attributes that Cropster Agro does not convincingly demonstrate.

The price-to-book value ratio of 10.79x appears particularly stretched when compared to packaging peers such as Cosmo First (1.21x), Mold-Tek Packaging (2.73x), and Huhtamaki India (1.17x). Even XPRO India, which trades at a higher P/E of 165.48x, commands a P/BV of only 3.10x. Cropster Agro's elevated P/BV multiple suggests the market is pricing in extraordinary future growth and profitability improvements that may prove difficult to achieve.

The company's PEG ratio of 4.94 further underscores the valuation challenge. A PEG ratio above 2.0 typically indicates that a stock is expensive relative to its growth rate, and at nearly 5.0, Cropster Agro appears significantly overvalued on a growth-adjusted basis. The EV/EBITDA multiple of 76.15x and EV/Sales of 5.85x similarly point to stretched valuations that leave little room for disappointment.

P/E Ratio (TTM)
80.59x
Sector Avg: ~25x
Price to Book Value
10.79x
Peer Avg: ~1.8x
EV/EBITDA
76.15x
Very Expensive
PEG Ratio
4.94x
Growth Premium Unjustified

The stock's journey from its 52-week high of ₹32.10 to the current price of ₹14.90 represents a decline of 53.58%, suggesting the market has already begun repricing the valuation excess. However, even at current levels, the stock appears expensive relative to fundamentals. A fair value estimate based on peer multiples and the company's growth trajectory would place the stock closer to ₹8-10 per share, implying further downside risk of 30-40% from current levels.

Shareholding Pattern: Complete Retail Dominance

The shareholding structure of Cropster Agro reveals an unusual characteristic: 100% non-institutional holding with zero promoter stake, no FII presence, no mutual fund investment, and no insurance company participation. This complete absence of institutional investors and promoters raises significant governance and confidence concerns.

Category Dec'25 Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 QoQ Change
Promoter 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
FII 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Mutual Funds 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Insurance 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Non-Institutional 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

The lack of institutional participation is particularly telling. Sophisticated institutional investors typically conduct rigorous due diligence before investing, and their complete absence suggests either undiscovered value (unlikely given the stretched valuations) or fundamental concerns about the business model, governance, or growth sustainability. The zero promoter holding is especially unusual for an Indian listed company and may indicate a professional management structure without founder involvement—a rarity in the micro-cap space that can cut both ways in terms of governance and strategic direction.

Stock Performance: Severe Underperformance Across Timeframes

Cropster Agro's stock performance presents a study in contrasts between long-term gains and recent sharp declines. Over a five-year horizon, the stock has delivered extraordinary returns of 1,583.62%, vastly outperforming the Sensex's 61.40% gain and generating alpha of 1,522.22 percentage points. Similarly, three-year returns of 199.38% and four-year returns of 231.33% demonstrate that early investors enjoyed spectacular wealth creation.

However, the narrative shifts dramatically when examining recent performance. Over the past year, the stock has declined 26.64% whilst the Sensex gained 9.81%, resulting in negative alpha of 36.45 percentage points. The underperformance has accelerated in recent months, with the stock down 16.67% over three months, 14.02% over one month, and 9.70% over the past week—all periods during which the broader market remained relatively stable or posted modest gains.

Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week -9.70% -0.98% -8.72%
1 Month -14.02% -0.14% -13.88%
3 Months -16.67% -1.77% -14.90%
6 Months -11.78% +3.54% -15.32%
YTD -24.13% -2.08% -22.05%
1 Year -26.64% +9.81% -36.45%
3 Years +199.38% +36.80% +162.58%
5 Years +1,583.62% +61.40% +1,522.22%

The stock's high beta of 1.50 indicates significantly higher volatility than the broader market, with a one-year volatility of 63.18% compared to the Sensex's 11.57%. This elevated volatility, combined with negative returns, places Cropster Agro in the "high risk, low return" category—an unattractive risk-reward profile for most investors. The risk-adjusted return of -0.42 over the past year underscores the poor performance even after accounting for the stock's volatility.

Technical indicators paint a uniformly bearish picture. The stock trades below all key moving averages—5-day (₹15.74), 20-day (₹16.40), 50-day (₹18.22), 100-day (₹19.04), and 200-day (₹19.30)—suggesting strong downward momentum. The overall technical trend turned bearish on January 6, 2026, at ₹18.73, and has continued to deteriorate. MACD, Bollinger Bands, KST, and Dow Theory all flash bearish signals on weekly timeframes, indicating that technical selling pressure remains intact.

Investment Thesis: Quality Concerns Outweigh Operational Progress

Cropster Agro's investment proposition presents a paradox: improving operational metrics juxtaposed against stretched valuations, absent institutional confidence, and deteriorating market sentiment. The company's Mojo Score of 36 out of 100 with a "SELL" rating reflects this fundamental disconnect between business performance and market pricing.

Valuation Grade
Very Expensive
Quality Grade
Average
Financial Trend
Positive
Technical Trend
Bearish

The company's quality grade of "Average" reflects a mixed financial profile. Whilst the five-year sales growth of 220.00% appears impressive, this must be viewed against a low base and the modest EBIT growth of 16.89%. The average ROCE of 6.38% and ROE of 10.45%, though improving in recent quarters, do not indicate exceptional capital efficiency. The company benefits from a debt-free balance sheet and zero promoter pledging, but these positives are offset by negligible institutional holdings and persistent negative operating cash flows despite reported profitability.

KEY STRENGTHS ✓

  • Debt-Free Balance Sheet: Negligible debt (₹0.45 crores) with net cash position provides financial flexibility and eliminates interest rate risk.
  • Consistent Margin Expansion: Operating margin improved to 8.08% from 6.23% YoY, demonstrating operational efficiency gains and pricing power.
  • Sequential Revenue Growth: Seven consecutive quarters of QoQ revenue growth (excluding one quarter) indicates sustained demand momentum.
  • Strong Long-Term Track Record: Five-year returns of 1,583.62% demonstrate wealth creation potential for early investors.
  • Improving Return Ratios: Latest ROE of 13.39% and ROCE of 13.48% show improvement from historical averages, indicating better capital utilisation.
  • Zero Promoter Pledging: No encumbrance on shares eliminates one governance risk factor.
  • Robust Liquidity Position: Current assets of ₹92.14 crores against current liabilities of ₹3.10 crores ensure strong working capital cushion.

KEY CONCERNS ⚠

  • Extreme Valuation Premium: P/E of 80.59x and P/BV of 10.79x represent significant overvaluation versus peers and fundamentals.
  • Zero Institutional Holdings: Complete absence of FIIs, mutual funds, and insurance companies raises serious confidence concerns.
  • Negative Operating Cash Flow: Despite reported profits, operating cash flow has been negative for two consecutive years due to working capital build-up.
  • Severe Price Decline: Stock down 53.58% from 52-week high and 26.64% over past year indicates market repricing of valuation excess.
  • Unusually Low Tax Rate: Effective tax rate of 3.66% in Q3 FY26 is unsustainably low; normalisation would materially impact net profit.
  • High Volatility Profile: Beta of 1.50 and one-year volatility of 63.18% make the stock unsuitable for risk-averse investors.
  • Weak Risk-Adjusted Returns: Negative risk-adjusted return of -0.42 over one year places stock in "high risk, low return" category.
"Operational improvements and margin expansion cannot justify valuations that price in perfection when institutional investors remain entirely absent and cash flows tell a different story than reported profits."

Outlook: What to Watch

The trajectory for Cropster Agro over the coming quarters will depend on several critical factors. Investors should closely monitor whether the company can sustain its margin expansion trajectory, convert reported profits into positive operating cash flows, and attract institutional investor interest—the absence of which remains a glaring red flag.

POSITIVE CATALYSTS

  • Sustained Margin Expansion: Continuation of 8%+ operating margins for multiple quarters would validate operational improvements.
  • Positive Operating Cash Flow: Conversion of profits into cash would address sustainability concerns and validate earnings quality.
  • Institutional Entry: Any mutual fund or FII buying would signal improved confidence and provide stock price support.
  • Revenue Acceleration: Quarterly growth consistently above 10% would justify some valuation premium and demonstrate market share gains.
  • Improved Capital Efficiency: ROE sustainably above 15% would indicate better capital allocation and profitability.

RED FLAGS TO MONITOR

  • Further Working Capital Deterioration: Continued negative operating cash flows would raise serious questions about business model sustainability.
  • Margin Compression: Any reversal in margin expansion due to raw material inflation or competitive pricing pressure.
  • Revenue Growth Slowdown: QoQ revenue decline or sustained single-digit growth would undermine the growth premium in valuation.
  • Tax Rate Normalisation: Effective tax rate moving towards 25-30% would materially reduce reported net profit growth.
  • Technical Breakdown: Stock breaking below ₹14.00 could trigger further selling pressure towards ₹10-12 levels.

The Verdict: Operational Progress Insufficient to Justify Valuation

SELL

Score: 36/100

For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions at current valuations. The stock trades at 80.59x P/E and 10.79x P/BV with zero institutional participation, negative operating cash flows, and bearish technical momentum. The risk-reward profile is highly unfavourable. Consider the stock only if it corrects to ₹8-10 per share, which would bring valuations closer to reasonable levels relative to fundamentals and peer multiples.

For Existing Holders: Consider reducing positions or exiting entirely, especially if holding unrealised gains. Whilst Q3 FY26 results show operational improvement, the extreme valuation premium leaves no margin of safety. The 53.58% decline from the 52-week high suggests the market is already repricing the stock, and further downside remains likely. Use any technical bounce towards ₹16-17 as an exit opportunity.

Fair Value Estimate: ₹8-10 per share (46-33% downside from current price of ₹14.90). This valuation assumes normalisation to peer multiples of 25-30x P/E and 2-3x P/BV, which would still represent a premium to most packaging sector peers but acknowledge the company's improving operational trajectory.

Cropster Agro's story illustrates the danger of valuation disconnects in micro-cap stocks. Whilst the company demonstrates genuine operational improvements with margin expansion and consistent revenue growth, these positives are overwhelmed by stretched valuations, absent institutional confidence, and cash flow concerns. The complete lack of promoter holding and zero institutional participation are particularly troubling governance signals that prudent investors should not ignore. Until valuations correct substantially or the company demonstrates sustained positive operating cash flows alongside institutional buying, the stock remains a high-risk proposition unsuitable for most portfolios.

Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)

⚠️ Investment Disclaimer

This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The author and publisher are not responsible for any investment decisions made based on this analysis.

{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News