Dhruv Consultancy Services Q3 FY26: Catastrophic Loss Signals Deep Operational Crisis

Feb 14 2026 12:08 AM IST
share
Share Via
Dhruv Consultancy Services Ltd. has reported a devastating Q3 FY26 result that has sent shockwaves through the micro-cap space, posting a net loss of ₹31.01 crores against a profit of ₹2.15 crores in the year-ago quarter—a staggering decline of 1,542.33%. The Navi Mumbai-based commercial services company, with a market capitalisation of just ₹54.00 crores, witnessed negative revenue of ₹5.69 crores in Q3 FY26, marking an unprecedented operational collapse. The stock has plummeted 71.78% over the past year and currently trades at ₹28.50, dangerously close to its 52-week low of ₹24.70.
Dhruv Consultancy Services Q3 FY26: Catastrophic Loss Signals Deep Operational Crisis
Net Profit (Q3 FY26)
-₹31.01 Cr
▼ 1,542.33% YoY
Net Sales (Q3 FY26)
-₹5.69 Cr
▼ 125.88% YoY
PAT Margin
544.99%
Negative revenue
Return on Equity
6.14%
Below average

The magnitude of this quarterly disaster cannot be overstated. Dhruv Consultancy, which provides consultancy services in the commercial space, has essentially reported negative sales—a highly unusual occurrence that suggests severe contract cancellations, revenue reversals, or accounting adjustments. The operating profit before depreciation, interest, and tax (PBDIT) excluding other income plunged to negative ₹29.48 crores, resulting in an incomprehensible margin of 518.1%. Sequential performance was equally catastrophic, with net profit declining 3,170.30% from Q2 FY26's modest ₹1.01 crores.

The stock has been in relentless decline, losing 19.42% in just the past week and 36.53% over the last month. Trading at ₹28.50 as of February 13, 2026, shares are now 73.49% below their 52-week high of ₹107.50 reached less than a year ago. The company's proprietary Mojo Score stands at a dismal 15 out of 100, firmly in "STRONG SELL" territory, with bearish technical indicators across all timeframes and a deteriorating financial trend classification.

Financial Performance: Unprecedented Revenue Collapse

The Q3 FY26 results reveal a company in acute distress. Net sales of negative ₹5.69 crores represent a sequential decline of 129.59% from Q2 FY26's ₹19.23 crores and a year-on-year collapse of 125.88% from Q3 FY25's ₹21.99 crores. This negative revenue figure is highly abnormal and typically indicates significant contract reversals, refunds, or accounting write-backs that have overwhelmed any incoming revenue during the quarter.

Metric Q3 FY26 Q2 FY26 Q1 FY26 Q4 FY25 Q3 FY25
Net Sales (₹ Cr) -5.69 19.23 21.04 27.60 21.99
QoQ Change -129.59% -8.60% -23.77% +25.51% -32.69%
Net Profit (₹ Cr) -31.01 1.01 1.60 1.99 2.15
QoQ Change -3,170.30% -36.88% -19.60% -7.44% +13.76%
PAT Margin (%) 544.99 5.25 7.60 7.21 9.78
Operating Margin (%) 518.10 10.14 15.30 16.23 17.78

Operating expenses remained stubbornly high despite the revenue implosion. Employee costs of ₹5.04 crores in Q3 FY26, whilst slightly lower than previous quarters, still represent a massive burden when set against negative revenue. The operating profit before depreciation, interest, and tax excluding other income stood at negative ₹29.48 crores, the lowest in the company's recent history. Even the modest other income of ₹0.24 crores—down from ₹0.56 crores in Q3 FY25—could not stem the bleeding.

The profit before tax plunged to negative ₹30.87 crores in Q3 FY26 from a positive ₹2.64 crores in the year-ago quarter. Curiously, the company reported a positive tax of ₹0.14 crores despite the massive loss, resulting in an incomprehensible tax rate of negative 0.45%. This suggests tax adjustments or reversals that further complicated an already disastrous quarter. The final net loss of ₹31.01 crores translates to an earnings per share of negative ₹16.35, the lowest on record.

Critical Red Flag: Negative Revenue

The negative net sales of ₹5.69 crores in Q3 FY26 is an extremely rare and concerning development. This typically occurs when revenue reversals, contract cancellations, or accounting adjustments exceed new revenue generation. Such occurrences often signal fundamental business model failures, client disputes, or severe operational disruptions. Investors should seek immediate management clarification on the underlying causes before considering any position in the stock.

Operational Challenges: Structural Weakness Exposed

The Q3 FY26 debacle has laid bare the structural weaknesses that have plagued Dhruv Consultancy Services. The company's return on equity (ROE) of just 6.14% on average basis ranks amongst the weakest in its peer group and reflects poor capital efficiency. Higher ROE values indicate superior management effectiveness in generating profits from shareholder capital, and Dhruv's single-digit ROE signals that the company struggles to create value for its owners. The latest ROE of 6.37% offers no improvement, remaining firmly in below-average territory.

Return on capital employed (ROCE) tells a similar story of operational inefficiency. At 8.63% on average and 7.14% for the latest period, Dhruv Consultancy generates minimal returns on the total capital deployed in the business. This weak ROCE, combined with high debt levels relative to EBITDA (debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 4.19), creates a precarious financial position. The company's EBIT-to-interest coverage of just 4.08 times leaves little room for error, and the recent operating losses have likely pushed this ratio into dangerous territory.

The balance sheet as of March 2025 showed shareholder funds of ₹103.50 crores, comprising share capital of ₹18.97 crores and reserves of ₹84.54 crores. However, the catastrophic Q3 FY26 loss of ₹31.01 crores will have significantly eroded these reserves. Long-term debt stood at a modest ₹0.81 crores, down from ₹2.51 crores a year earlier, but current liabilities of ₹35.49 crores remain elevated. Current assets of ₹115.64 crores provide some buffer, but the sustainability of this working capital position is now in serious doubt given the operational collapse.

Quality Assessment: Below Average and Deteriorating

Dhruv Consultancy Services carries a "Below Average" quality grade based on long-term financial performance. The company's 5-year sales growth of just 3.48% and 5-year EBIT growth of negative 11.17% paint a picture of stagnation and decline. Average ROCE of 8.63% and ROE of 6.14% rank poorly against industry standards. The debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 4.19 indicates relatively high leverage for a company with such weak profitability metrics. Institutional holdings of just 3.28% suggest sophisticated investors have largely avoided this stock.

The Revenue Crisis: What Went Wrong?

The unprecedented negative revenue in Q3 FY26 demands deeper examination. In the commercial services and consultancy sector, negative sales can arise from several scenarios: significant contract cancellations where advance payments must be refunded, disputes leading to revenue reversals, project failures requiring compensation, or accounting adjustments to correct prior period overstatements. Without explicit management commentary, investors are left to speculate on the root cause.

Looking at the broader nine-month performance for FY26, the company has generated total sales of just ₹34.58 crores across Q1, Q2, and Q3 combined (after accounting for the negative Q3 figure). This represents a dramatic 36.74% decline from the nine-month FY25 sales of ₹54.66 crores. The sequential deterioration is particularly alarming: Q1 FY26 sales of ₹21.04 crores fell to ₹19.23 crores in Q2 FY26, before collapsing to negative territory in Q3 FY26.

Employee costs have remained stubbornly high throughout this revenue crisis, totalling ₹15.68 crores for the nine months of FY26 compared to ₹17.22 crores for the same period last year. This suggests the company has been slow to right-size its workforce to match the declining business volumes. The operating profit margin excluding other income, which stood at a respectable 16.23% in Q4 FY25 and 15.30% in Q1 FY26, deteriorated to 10.14% in Q2 FY26 before imploding to an incomprehensible 518.1% in Q3 FY26 due to the negative revenue base.

Peer Comparison: Lagging on All Fronts

When benchmarked against peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies sector, Dhruv Consultancy Services emerges as a clear underperformer. The company's ROE of 6.14% trails the sector average significantly, with peers like IMEC Services achieving 21.35% and Techknowgreen posting 20.40%. Even amongst smaller players, Dhruv's capital efficiency appears subpar.

Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE (%) Debt/Equity Div Yield (%)
Dhruv Consultancy 8.01 0.51 6.14 0.17 0.35
Purple Wave Info 12.76 6.72 0.00 0.00
Telge Projects 19.40 2.58 0.00 0.00
Techknowgreen 10.70 2.31 20.40 0.04
IMEC Services 1.96 1.78 21.35 -0.14
We Win Ltd 13.47 1.39 9.17 0.13

The only apparent "advantage" Dhruv Consultancy holds is its deeply depressed valuation. Trading at a price-to-book value of just 0.51 times versus a peer average of approximately 3.0 times, the stock appears statistically cheap. However, this discount exists for good reason—the company's weak ROE, deteriorating financial trend, and catastrophic Q3 FY26 results justify investor scepticism. The P/E ratio of 8.01 times, whilst lower than most peers, reflects market expectations of continued earnings weakness or potential losses ahead.

Valuation Analysis: Cheap for a Reason

At the current market price of ₹28.50, Dhruv Consultancy Services trades at a P/E ratio of 8.01 times trailing twelve-month earnings, significantly below the industry average P/E of 14 times. The price-to-book value of 0.51 times suggests the stock trades at roughly half its stated book value of ₹54.57 per share. These metrics would typically signal an attractive entry point, but the company's operational crisis fundamentally alters the valuation equation.

The enterprise value-to-EBITDA multiple of 5.40 times and EV-to-EBIT of 8.15 times appear reasonable on a historical basis, but these metrics are based on trailing twelve-month figures that include relatively healthier quarters from FY25. Once Q3 FY26's massive loss is fully reflected in rolling twelve-month calculations, these multiples will deteriorate sharply. The EV-to-sales ratio of 0.80 times similarly fails to capture the recent revenue collapse.

The stock's dividend yield of 0.35% based on the latest dividend of ₹0.10 per share (ex-date February 14, 2025) offers no meaningful compensation for the risks involved. With a dividend payout ratio of just 5.46%, the company has historically retained most earnings, but the Q3 FY26 loss will likely force a dividend suspension or significant reduction. The valuation grade has oscillated between "Fair" and "Expensive" over recent months before settling at "Fair," but this assessment predates the Q3 disaster and requires urgent revision.

"At ₹28.50, Dhruv Consultancy may appear statistically cheap, but value traps exist for a reason—the Q3 FY26 catastrophe has fundamentally impaired the investment case."

Shareholding Pattern: Institutional Exodus Continues

The shareholding pattern reveals a concerning lack of institutional confidence in Dhruv Consultancy Services. Promoter holding has remained stable at 49.44% over the last three quarters, with key promoters Pandurang Balkrishna Dandawate (21.31%) and Jayashri Pandurang Dandawate (15.32%) maintaining their stakes. Importantly, there is no promoter pledging, which provides some comfort that the founding family is not facing immediate financial stress requiring share collateralisation.

Category Dec'25 Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 QoQ Change
Promoter 49.44% 49.44% 49.44% 49.42% 0.00%
FII 2.34% 2.34% 1.39% 2.14% 0.00%
Mutual Funds 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Other DII 0.94% 3.59% 3.61% 0.98% -2.65%
Non-Institutional 47.28% 44.63% 45.56% 47.46% +2.65%

However, the institutional investor picture is deeply troubling. Foreign institutional investors (FIIs) hold a mere 2.34% as of December 2025, unchanged from September but up slightly from June's 1.39%. More concerning is the complete absence of mutual fund holdings (0.00%) and insurance company participation (0.00%), indicating that domestic institutional investors have entirely avoided this stock. The sharp 2.65 percentage point decline in other domestic institutional investor (DII) holdings from 3.59% in September to 0.94% in December signals active selling by these sophisticated investors, likely in response to deteriorating fundamentals.

The non-institutional shareholding of 47.28% has increased by 2.65 percentage points quarter-on-quarter, absorbing the shares sold by DIIs. This shift from institutional to retail hands typically precedes further price weakness, as retail investors often lack the resources and expertise to properly evaluate distressed micro-cap situations. The total institutional holding of just 3.28% ranks amongst the lowest in the sector and reflects the investment community's lack of conviction in the company's prospects.

Stock Performance: Relentless Decline Accelerates

The stock price performance of Dhruv Consultancy Services has been nothing short of catastrophic across all timeframes. Trading at ₹28.50 as of February 13, 2026, the stock has lost 71.78% over the past year, massively underperforming the Sensex's 8.52% gain by a staggering 80.30 percentage points. This represents one of the worst relative performances in the micro-cap space.

Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week -19.42% -1.14% -18.28%
1 Month -36.53% -1.20% -35.33%
3 Months -42.01% -2.19% -39.82%
6 Months -54.66% +2.59% -57.25%
YTD -39.99% -3.04% -36.95%
1 Year -71.78% +8.52% -80.30%
2 Years -67.50% +15.47% -82.97%
3 Years -48.32% +36.73% -85.05%

The recent acceleration in the decline is particularly alarming. The stock has lost 19.42% in just the past week, 36.53% over the last month, and 42.01% over three months. Year-to-date, shares are down 39.99%, significantly underperforming the Sensex's 3.04% decline. The stock's beta of 1.50 indicates it is 50% more volatile than the broader market, amplifying both gains and losses—though recent history has been entirely characterised by the latter.

From a risk-adjusted return perspective, Dhruv Consultancy falls squarely into the "HIGH RISK LOW RETURN" category. The one-year risk-adjusted return of negative 1.47 combined with volatility of 48.73% creates an unfavourable risk-reward profile. The stock currently trades just 15.38% above its 52-week low of ₹24.70 but a massive 73.49% below its 52-week high of ₹107.50, suggesting significant technical damage and loss of investor confidence.

All moving averages paint a uniformly bearish picture. The stock trades below its 5-day moving average (₹32.13), 20-day moving average (₹37.20), 50-day moving average (₹43.64), 100-day moving average (₹47.69), and 200-day moving average (₹57.02). This complete breakdown of technical support structures signals strong downward momentum with no immediate catalysts for reversal. The technical trend officially turned "Bearish" on February 2, 2026, at ₹35.85, and has only intensified since then.

Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags

The investment thesis for Dhruv Consultancy Services has fundamentally broken down following the Q3 FY26 catastrophe. The company's Mojo Score of just 15 out of 100 places it firmly in "STRONG SELL" territory, reflecting the convergence of negative factors across all key parameters. The financial trend classification of "NEGATIVE" captures the unprecedented operational collapse, whilst the "BEARISH" technical trend reflects sustained selling pressure and loss of investor confidence.

The quality assessment of "BELOW AVERAGE" is based on weak long-term financial performance, with 5-year sales growth of just 3.48% and 5-year EBIT growth of negative 11.17%. The company's average ROE of 6.14% and ROCE of 8.63% rank poorly against sector peers and indicate chronic capital inefficiency. The debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 4.19 suggests relatively high leverage for a business with such weak profitability, creating financial fragility in the face of operational stress.

The valuation, whilst appearing superficially attractive at a P/E of 8.01 times and P/BV of 0.51 times, represents a classic value trap. The market has correctly discounted the stock to reflect the severe operational challenges and uncertain outlook. Without clarity on the causes of the Q3 FY26 revenue collapse and a credible turnaround plan, the low valuation multiples offer no margin of safety—they merely reflect the high probability of continued losses and potential value destruction.

Key Strengths & Risk Factors

Key Strengths

  • No Promoter Pledging: Zero promoter share pledging indicates founding family is not facing immediate financial stress or margin calls
  • Stable Promoter Holding: Promoter stake of 49.44% has remained steady, suggesting long-term commitment despite operational challenges
  • Low Leverage: Net debt-to-equity ratio of 0.17 and long-term debt of just ₹0.81 crores limits financial risk from debt obligations
  • Depressed Valuation: P/BV of 0.51x and P/E of 8.01x create potential for sharp recovery if operational issues are resolved
  • Established History: Company incorporated in 2003 with over two decades of operational experience in consultancy services

Key Concerns

  • Catastrophic Q3 Loss: Net loss of ₹31.01 crores in Q3 FY26 represents a 1,542.33% YoY decline and signals severe operational failure
  • Negative Revenue: Net sales of negative ₹5.69 crores is highly unusual and suggests major contract reversals or accounting issues
  • Weak ROE/ROCE: Return on equity of 6.14% and ROCE of 8.63% indicate chronic capital inefficiency and poor management effectiveness
  • Institutional Exodus: DII holdings dropped 2.65% QoQ; zero mutual fund or insurance participation reflects lack of institutional confidence
  • Technical Breakdown: Stock down 71.78% in one year, trading below all moving averages with bearish indicators across all timeframes
  • Deteriorating Trend: Financial trend classification of "NEGATIVE" with lowest quarterly metrics across multiple parameters
  • High Volatility: Beta of 1.50 and volatility of 48.73% create unfavourable risk-reward profile for investors

Outlook: What to Watch

Potential Positive Catalysts

  • Management Clarification: Detailed explanation of Q3 FY26 negative revenue and concrete remediation plan
  • Contract Wins: Announcement of significant new consultancy contracts to rebuild revenue pipeline
  • Cost Restructuring: Aggressive expense reduction programme to align cost base with current business reality
  • Q4 FY26 Stabilisation: Return to positive revenue and reduced losses in the final quarter of fiscal year

Critical Red Flags

  • Continued Losses: Further quarterly losses or negative revenue in Q4 FY26 would signal terminal business decline
  • Working Capital Stress: Deterioration in current assets or inability to collect receivables given debtors turnover collapse
  • Promoter Selling: Any reduction in promoter holding or emergence of share pledging would indicate loss of confidence
  • Regulatory Issues: Accounting irregularities, auditor qualifications, or regulatory scrutiny related to negative revenue
  • Client Concentration: Discovery of over-reliance on single client whose contract cancellation caused the Q3 collapse

Forward Outlook

The path forward for Dhruv Consultancy Services is fraught with uncertainty. The company must first provide transparent disclosure regarding the causes of the Q3 FY26 negative revenue—whether it stems from contract disputes, project failures, accounting corrections, or other factors. Without this clarity, investors cannot properly assess whether the issue is temporary or indicative of deeper structural problems.

The Q4 FY26 results (January-March 2026) will be absolutely critical. A return to positive revenue generation and narrowing losses would suggest the Q3 catastrophe was an isolated event. However, continued negative revenue or deepening losses would confirm that the business model has fundamentally broken down. Given that Q4 results will likely be announced in May 2026, investors face a prolonged period of uncertainty with no near-term catalysts for recovery.

The company's balance sheet provides some breathing room, with shareholder funds of ₹103.50 crores as of March 2025, but the Q3 FY26 loss of ₹31.01 crores will have substantially eroded this cushion. If losses continue at this rate, the company's net worth could come under pressure within a few quarters. Management must act swiftly to right-size the cost base, particularly employee costs that remain elevated despite the revenue collapse.

Investment Verdict

STRONG SELL

Score: 15/100

For Fresh Investors: Avoid completely. The Q3 FY26 catastrophe with negative revenue of ₹5.69 crores and net loss of ₹31.01 crores signals a severe operational crisis. Without management clarity on the causes and a credible turnaround plan, the investment case is fundamentally broken. The stock's 71.78% decline over the past year reflects genuine business deterioration, not temporary weakness.

For Existing Holders: Strongly consider exiting at current levels. The confluence of negative financial trend, bearish technical indicators, institutional selling, and below-average quality creates an unfavourable risk-reward equation. Whilst the stock appears statistically cheap at 0.51 times book value, this represents a classic value trap where low multiples merely reflect high probability of continued losses. Wait for concrete evidence of operational stabilisation before considering re-entry.

Fair Value Estimate: ₹18.00-22.00 (23%-37% downside risk from current ₹28.50), assuming further deterioration before stabilisation. Any recovery to ₹35.00+ would require demonstrated return to profitability and revenue growth.

Note: ROCE = (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)

⚠️ Investment Disclaimer

This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. The analysis presented is based on publicly available information as of February 14, 2026, and circumstances may change materially. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News