The quarter's performance was characterised by subdued demand and pricing pressures across the paper segment. Net sales declined 1.99% sequentially to ₹450.61 crores and fell 8.98% year-on-year, marking the lowest quarterly revenue in recent periods. Operating profit margin (excluding other income) stood at 8.05%, down from 8.20% in Q1 FY26 but marginally improved from 7.55% in Q2 FY25, suggesting modest cost management efforts amidst revenue headwinds.
For the first half of FY26 (H1 FY26), Emami Paper Mills posted a combined net profit of ₹12.89 crores, representing a significant 36.78% decline compared to H1 FY25. This deterioration in half-yearly profitability signals structural challenges that extend beyond quarterly volatility, raising concerns about the company's ability to navigate persistent industry headwinds.
Financial Performance: Revenue Contraction and Margin Squeeze
A detailed examination of Q2 FY26 reveals a company grappling with both top-line and bottom-line pressures. Net sales of ₹450.61 crores declined 1.99% quarter-on-quarter and 8.98% year-on-year, reflecting weak demand dynamics in the paper industry. This marks the fourth consecutive quarter of year-on-year revenue decline, with sales falling from ₹495.09 crores in Q2 FY25 to the current level.
| Quarter | Net Sales (₹ Cr) | QoQ Change | YoY Change | Operating Margin | PAT Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep'25 | 450.61 | -1.99% | -8.98% | 8.05% | 1.46% |
| Jun'25 | 459.76 | -3.20% | -8.72% | 8.20% | 1.37% |
| Mar'25 | 474.95 | +4.54% | -1.97% | 6.55% | 0.83% |
| Dec'24 | 454.31 | -8.24% | — | 6.62% | 0.37% |
| Sep'24 | 495.09 | -1.71% | — | 7.55% | 1.53% |
| Jun'24 | 503.69 | +3.97% | — | 8.58% | 2.54% |
| Mar'24 | 484.47 | — | — | 14.45% | 5.61% |
Operating profit before depreciation, interest, and tax (PBDIT), excluding other income, stood at ₹36.26 crores in Q2 FY26, down 3.76% sequentially and 3.02% year-on-year. The operating margin (excluding other income) of 8.05% showed marginal improvement from 7.55% in Q2 FY25 but remained far below the 14.45% achieved in Q4 FY24, highlighting the erosion of operational efficiency over the past year.
Net profit of ₹6.58 crores declined 4.28% quarter-on-quarter and 13.31% year-on-year. PAT margin compressed to 1.46% from 1.53% in Q2 FY25, reflecting the cumulative impact of revenue decline and elevated cost structure. Employee costs rose to ₹23.35 crores (5.18% of sales) from ₹21.41 crores (4.32% of sales) in Q2 FY25, indicating wage inflation pressures.
Interest costs rose to ₹17.33 crores in Q2 FY26 from ₹14.92 crores in Q2 FY25, reflecting higher borrowing costs and elevated debt levels. Depreciation remained stable at ₹13.77 crores. The tax rate for the quarter stood at 34.66%, higher than the 25.07% in Q2 FY25, further pressuring net profitability.
Operational Challenges: Weak Returns and Leverage Concerns
Emami Paper Mills' operational metrics paint a picture of a company struggling with capital efficiency and profitability. The average return on equity (ROE) over recent years stands at 9.23%, whilst the latest ROE for FY25 was a mere 2.88%, significantly below industry standards and indicating poor capital efficiency. Higher ROE values typically signal better profitability and effective use of shareholder capital, making this low figure a critical concern for investors.
Return on capital employed (ROCE) averaged 11.78% over the past five years, with the latest figure at 11.96%. Whilst marginally positive, this level of ROCE suggests the company generates modest returns relative to the capital deployed in its operations. For a capital-intensive paper manufacturing business, these returns are insufficient to justify significant reinvestment or expansion.
⚠️ Key Operational Concerns
Weak Profitability: ROE of 2.88% (FY25) and average ROE of 9.23% indicate poor capital efficiency. Higher ROE is a hallmark of strong performers, and Emami Paper's low figures signal fundamental profitability challenges.
High Leverage: Net debt-to-equity ratio of 1.13 and debt-to-EBITDA of 3.76 indicate elevated financial risk. Long-term debt stood at ₹314.40 crores as of March 2025, up from ₹230.02 crores in March 2024.
Interest Coverage: EBIT-to-interest ratio of 2.17 times suggests limited cushion to service debt obligations, particularly concerning in a rising interest rate environment.
The company's balance sheet reveals increasing leverage. Long-term debt rose to ₹314.40 crores as of March 2025 from ₹230.02 crores in March 2024, a 36.68% increase. Net debt-to-equity averaged 1.13, whilst debt-to-EBITDA stood at 3.76 times, both indicating elevated financial risk. Current liabilities increased to ₹650.64 crores from ₹543.58 crores, further straining liquidity.
On a positive note, the company maintains a pledge-free promoter shareholding structure, with promoters holding a stable 74.97% stake. However, institutional participation remains minimal at 0.57%, with negligible mutual fund and insurance holdings, reflecting limited institutional confidence in the company's growth prospects.
Industry Context: Navigating a Challenging Paper Market
The Indian paper industry has faced significant headwinds in recent quarters, including weak demand from key end-user segments, elevated raw material costs, and intense competition from imports. Emami Paper Mills' performance must be viewed against this challenging backdrop, where many players have struggled to maintain profitability.
The company's five-year sales growth of 6.66% appears modest but masks significant volatility. More concerning is the five-year EBIT growth of -7.43%, indicating that whilst the company has managed to grow revenues, profitability has deteriorated substantially over the medium term. This negative EBIT growth trajectory suggests structural issues with pricing power and cost management.
Non-Operating Income Dependency
A notable red flag in Q2 FY26 is the elevated contribution of non-operating income to profitability. Other income of ₹4.91 crores represented 48.76% of profit before tax (PBT) of ₹10.07 crores, indicating that nearly half the company's pre-tax profit came from non-core sources rather than operating activities. This dependency on other income raises questions about the sustainability of reported profits and the underlying health of core operations.
The paper industry's cyclical nature and capital-intensive requirements mean that companies must maintain strong operational efficiency and pricing discipline to generate acceptable returns. Emami Paper's declining margins and weak return ratios suggest it is losing ground in this competitive landscape.
Peer Comparison: Valuation Premium Despite Weaker Fundamentals
A comparative analysis with industry peers reveals that Emami Paper Mills trades at a significant valuation premium despite exhibiting weaker fundamental metrics. The company's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 30.57 times is substantially higher than most peers, whilst its return on equity of 9.23% lags behind several competitors.
| Company | P/E (TTM) | P/BV | ROE (%) | Debt/Equity | Div Yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emami Paper | 30.57 | 0.88 | 9.23 | 1.13 | 1.62 |
| Satia Industries | 7.77 | 0.73 | 17.95 | 0.16 | 0.39 |
| N R Agarwal Inds | 24.20 | 0.96 | 11.56 | 0.65 | 0.46 |
| Cheviot Company | 11.42 | 1.05 | 10.98 | -0.06 | 0.44 |
| Gloster Ltd | NA (Loss Making) | 0.64 | 3.40 | -0.03 | 3.16 |
| Pakka | 23.26 | 1.49 | 16.23 | 0.31 | — |
Satia Industries, trading at a P/E of 7.77 times, delivers a superior ROE of 17.95% with significantly lower leverage (debt-to-equity of 0.16). Similarly, Pakka commands a P/E of 23.26 times whilst generating an ROE of 16.23%. Emami Paper's higher P/E multiple of 30.57 times appears unjustified given its weaker ROE of 9.23% and higher leverage profile.
The company does trade at a modest discount to book value, with a price-to-book (P/BV) ratio of 0.88 times compared to the peer average of approximately 1.0 times. However, this discount reflects the market's recognition of the company's subdued return profile rather than representing an attractive entry opportunity. The dividend yield of 1.62% is the highest amongst peers, offering some income support for long-term holders.
Valuation Analysis: Premium Multiples Despite Deteriorating Fundamentals
At the current market price of ₹98.62, Emami Paper Mills trades at a P/E ratio of 30.57 times trailing twelve-month earnings, representing a significant premium to the industry P/E of 15 times. This valuation appears stretched given the company's deteriorating financial performance and weak growth trajectory.
The price-to-book value of 0.88 times offers some comfort, trading below the company's book value per share of ₹84.52. However, this discount must be weighed against the low ROE of 2.88% (latest) and 9.23% (average), which suggests the company struggles to generate value above its book value. A low ROE combined with a P/BV below 1.0 typically indicates a value trap rather than an attractive opportunity.
The enterprise value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) multiple of 9.99 times and EV-to-EBIT of 16.17 times are elevated for a company with declining margins and negative EBIT growth over five years. The EV-to-capital employed ratio of 0.94 times appears reasonable, but when combined with a ROCE of only 11.96%, it suggests limited value creation potential.
Despite the company's proprietary valuation grade showing "Attractive" status, the fundamental metrics do not support this assessment. Fair value, based on peer multiples and growth trajectory, appears closer to ₹75-80 per share, implying 20-24% downside from current levels. Investors should exercise caution given the premium valuation relative to deteriorating fundamentals.
Shareholding Pattern: Stable Promoter Base, Negligible Institutional Interest
The shareholding pattern of Emami Paper Mills has remained remarkably stable over recent quarters, with promoter holding steady at 74.97% across the last five quarters. This unwavering promoter commitment provides some stability, though the lack of any buying or selling activity could also signal limited conviction about near-term prospects.
| Quarter | Promoter | FII | Mutual Funds | Insurance | Other DII | Non-Inst |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep'25 | 74.97% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 24.46% |
| Jun'25 | 74.97% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 24.49% |
| Mar'25 | 74.97% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 24.47% |
| Dec'24 | 74.97% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 24.47% |
| Sep'24 | 74.97% | 0.56% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 23.88% |
Foreign institutional investor (FII) holdings have declined marginally from 0.56% in September 2024 to 0.53% in September 2025, representing minimal international interest. More concerning is the complete exit of mutual funds, which held 0.58% in September 2024 but reduced their stake to zero by December 2024. This exodus of domestic institutional investors signals waning confidence in the company's growth prospects amongst professional fund managers.
Insurance companies hold no stake in the company, whilst other domestic institutional investors (DIIs) account for a negligible 0.04%. Total institutional holdings stand at just 0.57%, one of the lowest levels in the paper industry peer group. This lack of institutional participation reflects concerns about the company's financial performance, growth trajectory, and corporate governance practices.
The promoter group is led by Diwakar Finvest Private Limited (27.03%), Suraj Finvest Private Limited (24.01%), and Emami Limited (13.13%), representing the Goenka family's control. Importantly, there is no promoter pledging, which eliminates one potential risk factor for equity holders.
Stock Performance: Persistent Underperformance Across Timeframes
Emami Paper Mills' stock performance has been disappointing across virtually all meaningful timeframes, with the company underperforming both the broader market and its sector peers. The stock has declined 7.44% over the past year, compared to the Sensex's gain of 5.73%, resulting in negative alpha of 13.17 percentage points.
| Period | Stock Return | Sensex Return | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Week | +1.16% | -0.32% | +1.48% |
| 1 Month | +2.33% | +3.65% | -1.32% |
| 3 Months | +3.16% | +3.39% | -0.23% |
| 6 Months | +7.43% | +4.61% | +2.82% |
| YTD | -11.79% | +7.42% | -19.21% |
| 1 Year | -7.44% | +5.73% | -13.17% |
| 2 Years | -25.60% | +31.41% | -57.01% |
| 3 Years | -44.31% | +38.18% | -82.49% |
The medium-to-long-term picture is even more concerning. Over two years, the stock has declined 25.60% whilst the Sensex gained 31.41%, resulting in a staggering negative alpha of 57.01 percentage points. The three-year performance shows a 44.31% decline compared to the Sensex's 38.18% gain, translating to negative alpha of 82.49 percentage points.
Year-to-date, Emami Paper has fallen 11.79% compared to the Sensex's 7.42% gain, underperforming by 19.21 percentage points. The stock also trails its sector, with the Paper, Forest & Jute Products index declining 1.50% over the past year compared to Emami Paper's 7.44% drop, indicating underperformance of 5.94 percentage points versus industry peers.
The stock's beta of 1.50 indicates high volatility relative to the market, with annualised volatility of 45.17% compared to the Sensex's 12.50%. This high volatility combined with negative returns places the stock in the "High Risk, Low Return" category, an unfavourable risk-reward profile for investors.
Currently trading at ₹98.62, the stock sits 23.01% below its 52-week high of ₹128.10 and 26.44% above its 52-week low of ₹78.00. The stock trades below all key moving averages (5-day, 20-day, 50-day, 100-day, and 200-day), indicating persistent technical weakness.
Investment Thesis: Limited Upside Potential Amidst Structural Challenges
Emami Paper Mills presents a challenging investment proposition characterised by deteriorating fundamentals, elevated leverage, and limited growth visibility. The company's proprietary Mojo score of 58 out of 100 places it in the "HOLD" category, though even this rating appears generous given the trajectory of key metrics.
The investment case rests primarily on the company's "Attractive" valuation grade, driven by a low enterprise value-to-capital employed ratio of 0.94 times. However, this metric alone cannot compensate for the fundamental weaknesses evident across profitability, growth, and leverage parameters.
The "Average" quality grade masks significant concerns. Whilst the company maintains no promoter pledging and has a stable shareholding structure, its return ratios tell a different story. Average ROE of 9.23% and latest ROE of just 2.88% indicate severe capital efficiency issues. Remember, higher ROE values are a hallmark of quality companies, and Emami Paper's low figures place it well below acceptable standards for long-term wealth creation.
"With half-yearly profits down 36.78%, operating margins compressed, and ROE languishing at 2.88%, Emami Paper Mills faces an uphill battle to restore investor confidence and operational momentum."
The "Flat" financial trend classification understates the severity of recent performance deterioration. H1 FY26 profit declined 36.78% year-on-year, whilst quarterly revenues have contracted for four consecutive quarters on a year-on-year basis. The five-year EBIT growth of -7.43% signals structural profitability challenges that extend beyond cyclical factors.
Technical indicators show a "Mildly Bullish" trend, but this must be viewed with scepticism given the stock's position below all major moving averages and its persistent underperformance versus both the market and sector peers. The high beta of 1.50 and elevated volatility of 45.17% add to the risk profile.
Key Strengths and Risk Factors
Key Strengths
- Stable Promoter Base: 74.97% promoter holding with zero pledging provides ownership stability and eliminates pledge-related risks
- Established Operations: Legacy manufacturing facility with decades of operational history in the paper industry
- Dividend Track Record: Consistent dividend payer with 1.62% yield and 37.22% payout ratio, highest amongst peers
- Valuation Support: P/BV of 0.88x trades below book value, offering some downside protection
- Moderate EV/Capital: Enterprise value-to-capital employed of 0.94x suggests reasonable asset pricing relative to deployment
Key Concerns
- Deteriorating Profitability: H1 FY26 PAT down 36.78% YoY; latest ROE of 2.88% signals severe capital inefficiency (higher ROE is critical for quality)
- Revenue Contraction: Four consecutive quarters of YoY sales decline, with Q2 FY26 revenue down 8.98% YoY
- Margin Compression: Operating margins declined from 14.45% (Q4 FY24) to 8.05% (Q2 FY26)
- High Leverage: Debt-to-equity of 1.13 and debt-to-EBITDA of 3.76 indicate elevated financial risk
- Weak Interest Coverage: EBIT-to-interest of 2.17x provides limited cushion for debt servicing
- Negative Growth: Five-year EBIT growth of -7.43% reflects structural profitability challenges
- Non-Operating Dependency: Other income represents 48.76% of Q2 FY26 PBT, raising sustainability concerns
- Institutional Exit: Mutual funds reduced stake from 0.58% to 0% in Q4 FY25; total institutional holding at negligible 0.57%
- Persistent Underperformance: Stock down 44.31% over three years vs Sensex gain of 38.18%
Outlook: What Lies Ahead for Emami Paper Mills
The outlook for Emami Paper Mills remains clouded by persistent operational challenges and limited near-term catalysts for improvement. The company must navigate weak industry demand, margin pressures, and elevated leverage whilst attempting to restore profitability and investor confidence.
Positive Catalysts to Watch
- Stabilisation of raw material costs and improvement in input price environment
- Recovery in end-user demand from packaging and printing segments
- Successful debt reduction and improvement in leverage ratios
- Margin expansion through operational efficiency initiatives
- Return to positive YoY revenue growth trajectory
Red Flags Requiring Monitoring
- Further deterioration in quarterly profitability or extended revenue contraction
- Rising interest costs impacting debt servicing ability
- Continued decline in operating margins below 8% levels
- Additional institutional investor exits or promoter stake dilution
- Inability to reduce dependency on non-operating income for profitability
- Breach of debt covenants or liquidity constraints
For the company to merit a rating upgrade, investors should look for sustained quarter-on-quarter improvement in revenue growth, operating margin expansion above 10%, reduction in debt levels, and improvement in ROE above 12-15%. Until these metrics show consistent improvement, the risk-reward profile remains unfavourable.
The Verdict: Avoid Fresh Positions; Existing Holders Should Reassess
Score: 58/100
For Fresh Investors: Not recommended for fresh investment. The combination of deteriorating fundamentals, elevated leverage, weak return ratios, and persistent underperformance creates an unfavourable risk-reward profile. Better opportunities exist in the paper sector with stronger balance sheets and improving operational metrics.
For Existing Holders: Continue to hold only if part of a diversified portfolio with high risk tolerance. Monitor quarterly results closely for signs of operational turnaround. Consider reducing positions on any sharp rallies above ₹110-115 levels. Set a stop-loss mentally at ₹85-90 to limit further downside.
Fair Value Estimate: ₹75-80 per share (20-24% downside from current levels of ₹98.62), based on peer multiples, growth trajectory, and return profile. Current valuation appears stretched relative to fundamentals.
Rationale: Whilst the company benefits from stable promoter ownership and trades below book value, these positives are overshadowed by deteriorating profitability (H1 FY26 PAT down 36.78%), weak return ratios (ROE of 2.88%), elevated leverage (debt-to-equity 1.13), and persistent revenue contraction. The negative five-year EBIT growth of -7.43% and high dependency on non-operating income (48.76% of PBT) raise concerns about earnings sustainability. Until the company demonstrates sustained operational improvement and margin recovery, investors should exercise caution.
⚠️ Investment Disclaimer
This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
