Excel Realty N Infra Q2 FY26: Profit Surge Masks Deeper Operational Struggles

The company's profit performance is almost entirely dependent on non-operating income, which contributed ₹1.80 crores in Q2 FY26—representing a staggering 168.22% of profit before tax. This structural weakness raises serious questions about the sustainability of earnings and the viability of Excel Realty's core trading operations. Year-on-year comparisons paint an equally concerning picture, with net profit declining 0.91% despite the sequential recovery, whilst revenue plummeted 63.08% from ₹4.09 crores in Q2 FY25.

Trading at ₹1.60 per share as of November 11, 2025, the stock has gained 1.27% on the day but remains 13.98% below its 52-week high of ₹1.86. With an astronomical P/E ratio of 1,311x and negligible institutional holding of just 1.10%, Excel Realty presents a high-risk proposition for investors seeking sustainable growth or operational excellence.

Financial Performance: Revenue Collapse Exposes Operational Fragility

Excel Realty's Q2 FY26 financial performance reveals a company struggling with fundamental business challenges. Net sales of ₹1.51 crores represent a catastrophic 73.92% sequential decline from Q1 FY26's ₹5.79 crores, marking the lowest quarterly revenue in recent periods. This volatility is not new—the company has exhibited erratic revenue patterns, with sales swinging from ₹0.49 crores in Q1 FY25 to ₹5.10 crores in Q4 FY24, suggesting an unstable business model or inconsistent deal flow.

The operating profit margin excluding other income deteriorated to -44.37% in Q2 FY26 from -21.42% in the previous quarter, indicating that for every rupee of revenue generated, the company loses 44 paise before accounting for non-operating income. Employee costs of ₹0.42 crores consumed 27.81% of revenues, whilst other operating expenses pushed the company deep into negative territory. This chronic operational unprofitability has persisted across multiple quarters, with the company failing to achieve positive operating margins in any of the last seven quarters.

The reported PAT margin of 72.19% is misleading, as it reflects the disproportionate contribution of other income rather than operational efficiency. Interest costs remain negligible at ₹0.03 crores, whilst depreciation of ₹0.04 crores suggests minimal capital-intensive operations. The tax charge of -₹0.02 crores (a tax credit) resulted in an anomalous tax rate of -1.87%, further complicating the earnings picture.

The Other Income Dependency: A Structural Weakness

Perhaps the most alarming aspect of Excel Realty's financial profile is its overwhelming reliance on non-operating income to generate reported profits. In Q2 FY26, other income of ₹1.80 crores not only exceeded the company's operating losses but constituted 168.22% of profit before tax. This pattern is consistent across quarters—in Q1 FY26, other income of ₹1.37 crores was the sole reason the company avoided a loss, whilst in Q2 FY25, other income of ₹1.30 crores similarly propped up profitability.

The nature of this other income is not disclosed in the available data, but typical sources include interest on deposits, dividend income, or gains from financial investments. Regardless of the source, this structural reliance means that Excel Realty's reported profitability bears little relationship to its operational performance or business model effectiveness. For investors, this represents a significant concern—if other income were to decline or cease, the company would immediately revert to loss-making status.

On a half-yearly basis for H1 FY26, the company reported net sales of ₹7.30 crores, representing 59.39% growth compared to the corresponding period. However, this growth is built on an unstable foundation, with quarterly revenues swinging wildly and operating losses persisting. The company's return on equity of just 0.19% ranks amongst the weakest in the trading and distribution sector, indicating extremely poor capital efficiency and shareholder value creation.

Balance Sheet: Adequate Liquidity, Limited Productive Assets

Excel Realty's balance sheet as of March 2025 shows shareholder funds of ₹173.25 crores, comprising share capital of ₹141.07 crores and reserves of ₹32.18 crores. The book value per share stands at ₹1.23, which compares to the current market price of ₹1.60, implying a price-to-book ratio of 1.29x. This modest premium suggests the market has limited confidence in the company's ability to generate returns above its cost of capital.

Current assets of ₹96.91 crores as of March 2025 provide adequate liquidity, whilst investments of ₹51.82 crores likely represent the source of the company's other income. Fixed assets of just ₹9.32 crores indicate a capital-light business model, consistent with a trading operation. Long-term debt is minimal at ₹0.78 crores, resulting in a debt-to-equity ratio near zero and eliminating solvency concerns. However, this conservative capital structure cannot compensate for the fundamental operational challenges the business faces.

Industry Context: Underperforming Within Trading Sector

Within the trading and distributors sector, Excel Realty's operational metrics place it at a significant disadvantage relative to peers. The company's return on equity of 0.19% is substantially below the peer average of approximately 5%, whilst its negative ROCE of -2.60% contrasts sharply with peers who generally maintain positive returns on capital. This performance gap suggests either structural disadvantages in Excel Realty's business model or execution challenges that management has been unable to address.

The trading and distribution sector in India has faced headwinds from increased competition, margin pressures, and evolving distribution channels. Companies that have thrived typically demonstrate consistent revenue growth, positive operating margins, and efficient working capital management—attributes conspicuously absent from Excel Realty's financial profile. The company's erratic quarterly revenue patterns suggest it may be dependent on sporadic large transactions rather than sustainable, recurring business relationships.

Excel Realty's astronomical P/E ratio of 1,311.12x stands in stark contrast to the peer average of approximately 27x, reflecting the artificially inflated earnings from other income rather than sustainable operational profitability. The company's price-to-book ratio of 1.29x is relatively moderate compared to peers like Mehai Technology (2.85x) or Chemkart India (4.97x), suggesting the market assigns limited value to Excel Realty's future growth prospects or competitive positioning.

Valuation Analysis: Extreme Multiples Reflect Earnings Distortion

Excel Realty's valuation metrics present a confusing picture dominated by the distorting effects of minimal, other-income-dependent profits. The trailing twelve-month P/E ratio of 1,311x is essentially meaningless as a valuation tool, reflecting the mathematical outcome of dividing the market capitalisation by negligible earnings rather than any rational assessment of business value. The company's EV/EBITDA of -44.55x is negative due to the company's operating losses, whilst the EV/Sales ratio of 11.74x appears elevated given the revenue volatility and lack of operational profitability.

The price-to-book ratio of 1.29x suggests the market values Excel Realty at a modest 29% premium to its net asset value. Given the company's inability to generate meaningful returns on these assets—with ROE of just 0.19%—this premium appears unjustified. A more appropriate valuation framework would apply a discount to book value, reflecting the capital destruction evident in the company's financial metrics.

The company's valuation grade is classified as "RISKY" by proprietary assessment frameworks, reflecting the combination of operational losses, earnings volatility, and structural dependence on non-operating income. Historical valuation grades have oscillated between "Risky" and "Does Not Qualify," indicating persistent fundamental challenges. The absence of dividend payments further reduces the investment appeal, as shareholders receive no cash return whilst the company struggles to establish operational profitability.

Shareholding Pattern: Stable Promoter Base, Minimal Institutional Interest

Excel Realty's shareholding pattern reveals a stable promoter holding of 19.12% that has remained unchanged across the last five quarters. The promoter group, led by Lakhmendra Chamanlal Khurana (10.29%) and Ranjana Lakhmendra Khurana (8.15%), shows no pledging of shares, which is a positive indicator of financial stability within the promoter group. However, the relatively low promoter stake of just 19.12% is unusual for an Indian micro-cap company and may reflect historical dilution or a diversified ownership structure.

Institutional participation in Excel Realty is virtually non-existent, with total institutional holdings of just 1.11% as of September 2025. Foreign institutional investor (FII) holdings increased to 1.10% in Q2 FY26 from 0.07% in Q1 FY26, representing a notable 1.03 percentage point sequential increase. However, this remains negligible in absolute terms and likely reflects opportunistic positioning by a small number of foreign investors rather than genuine institutional conviction in the company's prospects.

Mutual funds and insurance companies have zero exposure to Excel Realty, whilst other domestic institutional investors hold a negligible 0.01%. This absence of institutional participation is telling—professional fund managers conducting rigorous due diligence have evidently concluded that Excel Realty does not meet investment criteria, likely due to the operational challenges, earnings quality concerns, and limited growth visibility. The dominant non-institutional shareholding of 79.78% suggests the stock is primarily held by retail investors who may not fully appreciate the fundamental risks.

Technical Analysis: Mildly Bullish Trend on Low Conviction

From a technical perspective, Excel Realty's stock exhibits a "Mildly Bullish" trend as of November 11, 2025, having changed from "Bullish" on October 29, 2025 at ₹1.51. The stock is currently trading at ₹1.60, representing a 146.15% gain from its 52-week low of ₹0.65 but remains 13.98% below its 52-week high of ₹1.86 reached earlier in the year. This wide trading range reflects the speculative nature of the stock and the absence of fundamental anchors to guide valuation.

Technical indicators present a mixed picture. The weekly MACD shows a "Mildly Bearish" signal whilst the monthly MACD is "Bullish," suggesting conflicting momentum across timeframes. Bollinger Bands indicate "Bullish" signals on both weekly and monthly charts, suggesting the stock is trading in the upper portion of its recent range. However, the Dow Theory shows "Mildly Bearish" signals on both weekly and monthly timeframes, indicating that the broader trend structure remains questionable. The on-balance volume (OBV) indicator shows a "Mildly Bearish" weekly signal with "No Trend" monthly, suggesting that volume is not confirming the recent price strength.

Delivery volumes have declined significantly, with the trailing one-month average of 11.45 lakh shares representing a 64.47% decrease from the previous month's average of 32.22 lakh shares. This decline in delivery-based buying suggests waning investor interest and raises questions about the sustainability of the recent price recovery. The recent trading session saw delivery volume of 6.55 lakh shares representing just 14.71% of total volume, below the five-day average of 13.28%, indicating that much of the trading activity is speculative rather than investment-oriented.

Investment Thesis: Fundamental Weaknesses Outweigh Technical Momentum

Excel Realty's investment case is fundamentally challenged by the company's inability to generate sustainable operating profits. Whilst the proprietary Mojo score of 39/100 places the stock in "SELL" territory, the underlying factors driving this assessment warrant careful consideration. The company receives credit for a "Positive" short-term financial trend, reflecting the sequential profit recovery in Q2 FY26 and half-yearly revenue growth of 59.39%. Technical indicators also contribute positively, with the "Mildly Bullish" trend providing some near-term support.

However, these positive factors are overwhelmed by fundamental weaknesses. The quality assessment of "Below Average" reflects the company's weak return on equity of 0.19%, negative ROCE of -2.60%, and persistent operating losses. The five-year sales growth of 18.01% is offset by five-year EBIT growth of -6.74%, indicating that revenue expansion has not translated into improved profitability. The valuation grade of "RISKY" appropriately captures the elevated multiples relative to the quality of earnings and the structural dependence on non-operating income.

Key Strengths & Risk Factors

Outlook: What to Watch