The quarter's results revealed troubling trends across key metrics: net sales contracted 55.75% year-on-year to just ₹17.80 crores—the lowest quarterly revenue in recent history—whilst operating margins excluding other income compressed to 16.97%, down from 23.61% in the year-ago quarter. The company's heavy reliance on non-operating income, which constituted 42.54% of profit before tax, raises questions about the sustainability and quality of earnings.
The results underscore a company in transition, struggling to maintain operational momentum despite its debt-free balance sheet and historically strong return on equity. With the stock trading at 8 times trailing twelve-month earnings and 2.29 times book value, investors are grappling with whether the current valuation adequately reflects the deteriorating fundamentals or presents an opportunity amid temporary headwinds.
| Quarter | Net Sales (₹ Cr) | QoQ Change | Net Profit (₹ Cr) | QoQ Change | OPM (Excl OI) % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec'25 (Q3) | 17.80 | -4.81% | 4.19 | -33.81% | 16.97% |
| Sep'25 (Q2) | 18.70 | -16.70% | 6.33 | +30.25% | 15.35% |
| Jun'25 (Q1) | 22.45 | -74.68% | 4.86 | -95.27% | 5.12% |
| Mar'25 (Q4) | 88.68 | +120.43% | 102.84 | +982.53% | 16.15% |
| Dec'24 (Q3) | 40.23 | +16.07% | 9.50 | +84.82% | 8.65% |
| Sep'24 (Q2) | 34.66 | -3.16% | 5.14 | -2.65% | 12.15% |
| Jun'24 (Q1) | 35.79 | — | 5.28 | — | 13.38% |
Financial Performance: Revenue Collapse Overshadows Margin Resilience
Forbes & Company's Q3 FY26 performance revealed a company grappling with severe top-line pressures. Net sales of ₹17.80 crores represented not only a 55.75% year-on-year decline but also the lowest quarterly revenue figure in the available eight-quarter dataset. The sequential contraction of 4.81% from Q2 FY26's ₹18.70 crores extended the downward trajectory that began after an exceptional Q4 FY25, when the company posted ₹88.68 crores in sales—a figure that now appears increasingly anomalous.
The revenue collapse stands in stark contrast to the company's historical performance. In FY25, Forbes & Company had achieved annual sales of ₹199 crores, representing 60.5% growth over FY24. However, the nine-month FY26 performance (April-December 2025) shows sales of just ₹58.95 crores, suggesting the company is on track for a significant full-year revenue decline unless a dramatic recovery materialises in Q4.
Despite the revenue pressures, operating margins excluding other income held relatively steady at 16.97% in Q3 FY26, improving marginally from 15.35% in Q2 FY26. This resilience suggests some degree of cost discipline, though the absolute operating profit of ₹3.02 crores remains concerningly low. Employee costs of ₹5.11 crores in Q3 FY26 represented 28.7% of revenue—a proportion that would be unsustainable in a sustained low-revenue environment.
The quality of earnings presents a significant concern. Other income of ₹2.08 crores in Q3 FY26 constituted 42.54% of profit before tax, indicating the company's profitability is heavily dependent on non-operating sources. Whilst other income had spiked to ₹5.74 crores in Q2 FY26 and ₹4.92 crores in Q1 FY26, the sustained reliance on this line item across quarters raises questions about the sustainability of reported profits and the underlying health of core operations.
Critical Earnings Quality Concern
Non-operating income accounted for 42.54% of profit before tax in Q3 FY26, highlighting significant dependence on sources outside core business operations. This elevated proportion suggests limited visibility on sustainable earnings power and raises red flags about the company's ability to generate consistent profits from its diversified portfolio of engineering, automation, and consumer durable businesses.
Operational Challenges: Negative Momentum Across Key Metrics
The company's operational performance has deteriorated markedly, with its financial trend classification downgraded to "Negative" as of December 2025. This represents a significant reversal from the "Outstanding" rating the company enjoyed in March 2025, reflecting the sharp erosion in quarterly performance metrics.
Return on equity, whilst still strong at 29.61% on a latest-year basis, has declined substantially from the exceptional average of 555.68% recorded over recent periods. This normalisation suggests the extraordinary returns were driven by one-off factors rather than sustainable operational excellence. Return on capital employed stands at 11.95% on a latest-year basis, with a five-year average of just 8.27%—a figure that barely exceeds the company's cost of capital and indicates weak capital efficiency over the longer term.
The balance sheet presents a mixed picture. On the positive side, Forbes & Company operates with minimal debt, boasting a net debt-to-equity ratio of -0.28, effectively making it a net cash company. Shareholder funds stood at ₹219.48 crores as of March 2025, up from ₹140.28 crores in March 2024, reflecting retained earnings and capital restructuring. However, fixed assets of just ₹2.76 crores as of March 2025 suggest limited tangible operational infrastructure, raising questions about the company's capacity for revenue generation.
Key Monitoring Points
Earnings Per Share: EPS in Q3 FY26 fell to ₹3.25, the lowest in the recent quarterly dataset, down from ₹4.92 in Q2 FY26 and ₹7.39 in Q3 FY25. This 56% year-on-year decline mirrors the consolidated profit contraction and signals deteriorating per-share value creation.
Working Capital Dynamics: The debtors turnover ratio for H1 FY26 reached a high of 29.63 times, suggesting efficient receivables collection. However, this metric must be viewed in context of the sharply lower revenue base, which naturally inflates turnover ratios.
Cash flow generation has been problematic. For FY25, the company reported negative operating cash flow of ₹11 crores, with adjustments of ₹106 crores (negative) suggesting significant non-cash items or one-off factors distorting reported profits. The company's closing cash position of ₹14 crores as of March 2025, down from ₹19 crores a year earlier, provides limited buffer for operational challenges or growth investments.
Industry Context: Underperforming a Struggling Sector
Forbes & Company operates in the Electronics & Appliances sector, which itself has faced headwinds. The broader industry delivered a negative 19.90% return over the past year, reflecting challenging demand conditions, supply chain disruptions, and margin pressures across consumer durables and industrial automation segments.
Remarkably, despite its operational struggles, Forbes & Company's stock has outperformed its sector by 35.68 percentage points over the past year, posting a 15.78% return versus the sector's 19.90% decline. This relative outperformance likely reflects the company's diversified business model spanning engineering, real estate, and chemical tankers, which provides some insulation from pure-play electronics sector challenges.
However, the company's long-term growth trajectory remains deeply concerning. Net sales have declined at a compound annual rate of 41.16% over the past five years, one of the most severe contractions in its peer group. This reflects not just cyclical pressures but potentially structural challenges in the company's business mix and competitive positioning. The transition away from its historical Forbes Gokak identity and portfolio rationalisation under Shapoorji Pallonji Group ownership may have contributed to this revenue erosion.
Sector Positioning Analysis
Forbes & Company's diversified portfolio across engineering, industrial automation, consumer durables, chemical tankers, and real estate distinguishes it from pure-play electronics peers. This diversification has provided some resilience, enabling the stock to outperform the struggling Electronics & Appliances sector. However, the lack of scale in any single segment and the company's micro-cap status (₹557 crores market capitalisation) limit its ability to compete effectively against larger, more focused competitors.
Peer Comparison: Valuation Discount Reflects Fundamental Weakness
Relative to its Electronics & Appliances peer group, Forbes & Company trades at a significant valuation discount on certain metrics whilst commanding a premium on others, reflecting the market's uncertainty about its prospects.
| Company | P/E (TTM) | P/BV | ROE % | Debt/Equity | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forbes & Co | 7.75x | 2.29x | 555.68% | -0.28 | ₹557 Cr |
| MIRC Electronics | NA (Loss Making) | 7.07x | 0.31% | 0.22 | — |
| Butterfly Gandhimathi | 26.41x | 3.09x | 11.91% | -0.26 | — |
| Elin Electronics | 19.31x | 1.33x | 4.33% | -0.17 | — |
| CWD Ltd | 269.87x | 7.33x | 12.28% | 0.57 | — |
| Singer India | 55.26x | 2.40x | 7.11% | -0.52 | — |
Forbes & Company's P/E ratio of 7.75 times appears attractive compared to profitable peers like Butterfly Gandhimathi (26.41x), Elin Electronics (19.31x), and Singer India (55.26x). However, this discount reflects the market's scepticism about earnings sustainability given the company's negative revenue growth, heavy reliance on other income, and deteriorating quarterly trends.
The company's return on equity of 555.68% (average) vastly exceeds peers, but this figure is distorted by the low equity base and one-off factors. On a latest-year basis, the more normalised ROE of 29.61% still surpasses most peers but is declining rapidly. The price-to-book ratio of 2.29 times sits below the peer average of approximately 4.2 times, suggesting the market assigns limited value to the company's asset base and future earnings potential.
Forbes & Company's debt-free status (net debt-to-equity of -0.28) represents a competitive advantage versus leveraged peers, providing financial flexibility and reducing solvency risk. However, this strength has not translated into operational performance or revenue growth, highlighting that capital structure alone cannot drive value creation without effective business execution.
Valuation Analysis: Fair Rating Masks Deteriorating Fundamentals
Forbes & Company currently carries a "Fair" valuation rating, having been downgraded from "Very Attractive" in October 2025. At the current price of ₹409, the stock trades at 8 times trailing twelve-month earnings, 2.29 times book value, and an EV/EBITDA multiple of 21.26 times.
The P/E ratio of 8 times appears optically cheap, particularly against the industry average of 30 times. However, this discount is justified by multiple factors: the company's negative five-year sales growth of 41.16% annually, deteriorating quarterly trends, heavy dependence on other income, and "Negative" financial trend classification. The earnings base itself is suspect, with sustainability concerns given the operational revenue collapse.
The EV/EBITDA multiple of 21.26 times appears expensive for a company with Forbes & Company's growth profile and operational challenges. This elevated multiple likely reflects the company's minimal debt and investment holdings of ₹185.56 crores as of March 2025, which constitute a significant portion of enterprise value. The PEG ratio of 0.03 is mathematically distorted by the company's negative long-term growth rate and provides little valuation insight.
The stock's 52-week range of ₹264.35 to ₹477 reflects significant volatility, with the current price of ₹409 sitting 14.26% below the high and 54.72% above the low. The recent 4.72% single-day decline following Q3 results suggests the market is reassessing the company's fair value in light of deteriorating fundamentals.
"With revenue at an eight-quarter low, earnings quality concerns mounting, and no clear turnaround catalyst visible, Forbes & Company's 'Fair' valuation rating appears generous rather than conservative."
Shareholding: Stable Promoter Base Amid Institutional Absence
Forbes & Company's shareholding pattern reveals a concentrated ownership structure with minimal institutional participation, raising concerns about governance oversight and market liquidity.
| Quarter | Promoter % | FII % | MF % | Insurance % | Other DII % | Non-Inst % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec'25 | 73.85% | 8.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.04% | 16.87% |
| Sep'25 | 73.85% | 8.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.04% | 16.87% |
| Jun'25 | 73.85% | 8.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.04% | 16.86% |
| Mar'25 | 73.85% | 8.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.04% | 16.86% |
| Dec'24 | 73.85% | 10.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.96% | 15.03% |
Promoter holding has remained rock-solid at 73.85% across the last five quarters, with Shapoorji Pallonji And Company Private Limited holding 72.56% and Forbes Campbell Finance Limited holding 1.29%. This stability provides continuity but also concentrates decision-making power. Concerningly, a staggering 98.25% of promoter shares are pledged, representing an extreme level of encumbrance that raises red flags about the promoters' financial position and potential forced selling risk.
Foreign institutional investor holdings declined from 10.16% in December 2024 to 8.24% by March 2025, with no subsequent change through December 2025. This 1.92 percentage point reduction suggests FIIs exited positions during the March quarter, possibly anticipating the operational deterioration that has since materialised. The complete absence of mutual fund and insurance company holdings signals institutional investors see limited value or excessive risk in the stock.
Total institutional holdings stand at just 9.28%, well below typical levels for listed companies and indicating Forbes & Company operates largely outside institutional investor radar. Non-institutional holdings increased from 15.03% in December 2024 to 16.87% by December 2025, suggesting some retail accumulation, though this may reflect uninformed buying rather than conviction.
Stock Performance: Outperformance Driven by Low Base Effect
Forbes & Company's stock has delivered mixed returns across different timeframes, with recent strength offset by underlying volatility and technical deterioration.
| Period | Stock Return | Sensex Return | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Week | -5.72% | +0.90% | -6.62% |
| 1 Month | +29.84% | -2.84% | +32.68% |
| 3 Month | +11.52% | -2.53% | +14.05% |
| 6 Month | -2.09% | +0.97% | -3.06% |
| YTD (FY26) | +26.33% | -3.46% | +29.79% |
| 1 Year | +15.78% | +7.18% | +8.60% |
| 3 Years | +73.50% | +38.27% | +35.23% |
| 5 Years | +883.52% | +77.74% | +805.78% |
The stock's spectacular five-year return of 883.52% vastly outpaces the Sensex's 77.74% gain, generating alpha of 805.78 percentage points. However, this extraordinary performance reflects recovery from an extremely depressed base during the COVID-19 period and the company's historical restructuring challenges. The stock's three-year return of 73.50% (alpha of 35.23%) remains strong but shows the outperformance is normalising.
More recent performance reveals concerning trends. The one-month surge of 29.84% (versus Sensex's -2.84%) appears disconnected from fundamentals, suggesting speculative activity or short covering. However, the subsequent one-week decline of 5.72% and six-month underperformance of 3.06% versus the Sensex indicate the rally lacks conviction. Year-to-date, the stock has gained 26.33%, but this must be viewed against the backdrop of deteriorating quarterly results.
The stock's beta of 1.50 indicates high volatility, with movements 50% more extreme than the broader market. Annual volatility of 45.04% places Forbes & Company in the "HIGH RISK MEDIUM RETURN" category, with a Sharpe ratio of just 0.35 over the past year—well below the Sensex's 0.64, indicating poor risk-adjusted returns.
Technical Analysis: Mildly Bearish Trend With Multiple Resistance Levels
Forbes & Company's technical picture has deteriorated, with the stock in a "Mildly Bearish" trend since January 19, 2026, when it was trading at ₹363.30. The current price of ₹409 sits below all major moving averages: the 5-day MA (₹434.06), 20-day MA (₹360.21), 50-day MA (₹341.75), 100-day MA (₹361.03), and 200-day MA (₹381.64).
This positioning below short-term moving averages whilst above longer-term averages creates a confused technical picture, with the 20-day and 100-day MAs forming immediate resistance zones. The 52-week high of ₹477 stands 16.6% above current levels, representing a significant resistance barrier, whilst the 52-week low of ₹264.35 provides support 35.4% below.
Technical indicators present mixed signals. The weekly MACD shows "Mildly Bullish" readings whilst the monthly MACD is "Bearish," suggesting short-term momentum is attempting to turn positive against a negative longer-term trend. RSI indicators are "Bearish" on weekly timeframes with no clear signal monthly, indicating the stock lacks strong directional momentum. Bollinger Bands show "Mildly Bullish" weekly but "Mildly Bearish" monthly, reflecting the stock's volatility and lack of clear trend.
Delivery volumes have increased significantly, with the trailing one-month average delivery volume up 118.01% versus the previous month, suggesting increased conviction among buyers. However, this must be weighed against the stock's recent price decline and deteriorating fundamentals.
Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags Outweigh Valuation Appeal
Forbes & Company's investment thesis has weakened considerably, reflected in its Mojo Score of just 28 out of 100 and "STRONG SELL" advisory rating. The company's quality grade has been downgraded to "Average" from "Good," whilst its financial trend is classified as "Negative" and technical trend as "Mildly Bearish."
The valuation, whilst appearing optically cheap at 8 times earnings, fails to compensate for the multiple structural and operational challenges. The company's five-year sales decline of 41.16% annually represents one of the worst growth profiles in the market, whilst the recent quarterly revenue collapse to ₹17.80 crores suggests no near-term recovery catalyst. The heavy reliance on other income (42.54% of PBT) undermines earnings quality and sustainability.
The company's strengths—including its debt-free balance sheet, strong ROE of 29.61%, and investment holdings of ₹185.56 crores—are insufficient to offset the operational deterioration. The 98.25% promoter pledge level represents a critical risk factor that could trigger forced selling or governance concerns.
Key Strengths & Risk Factors
✓ KEY STRENGTHS
Debt-Free Balance Sheet: Net debt-to-equity of -0.28 provides financial flexibility and eliminates solvency risk, with minimal interest burden enabling operational focus.
Strong Return on Equity: Latest ROE of 29.61% demonstrates effective capital utilisation, though declining from historical highs and requiring monitoring.
Diversified Business Portfolio: Operations spanning engineering, automation, consumer durables, chemical tankers, and real estate provide revenue diversification and reduce single-segment dependency.
Shapoorji Pallonji Group Backing: Association with the established Shapoorji Pallonji conglomerate provides strategic support and potential access to group resources.
Investment Holdings: ₹185.56 crores in investments as of March 2025 represent potential value that could be unlocked through strategic monetisation.
⚠️ KEY CONCERNS
Severe Revenue Collapse: Q3 FY26 sales of ₹17.80 crores mark an eight-quarter low, with 55.75% YoY decline indicating structural rather than cyclical challenges.
Extreme Promoter Pledge: 98.25% of promoter shares pledged represents critical governance and financial risk, with potential for forced selling under adverse scenarios.
Poor Earnings Quality: Other income constituting 42.54% of PBT in Q3 FY26 raises sustainability concerns and questions about core business profitability.
Negative Long-Term Growth: Five-year sales CAGR of -41.16% represents one of the worst growth trajectories in the market, with no clear turnaround catalyst.
Minimal Institutional Interest: Total institutional holdings of just 9.28% with zero mutual fund or insurance participation signals lack of professional investor confidence.
Negative Cash Flow: Operating cash flow of -₹11 crores in FY25 indicates the company is consuming rather than generating cash from operations.
Deteriorating Financial Trend: Downgrade from "Outstanding" to "Negative" financial trend classification reflects rapid erosion in quarterly performance metrics.
Outlook: What Lies Ahead for Forbes & Company
POSITIVE CATALYSTS
Q4 FY26 Recovery: Potential for revenue rebound in January-March 2026 quarter if Q4 FY25's exceptional ₹88.68 crores performance was indicative of seasonal strength.
Investment Monetisation: Strategic sale or realisation of ₹185.56 crores investment portfolio could unlock shareholder value and improve return metrics.
Business Restructuring: Further portfolio rationalisation under Shapoorji Pallonji Group could streamline operations and improve focus on core profitable segments.
Debt-Free Advantage: Zero-debt structure provides flexibility to weather operational challenges without financial distress risk during turnaround phase.
RED FLAGS TO MONITOR
Continued Revenue Decline: Further QoQ contraction in Q4 FY26 would confirm structural rather than temporary challenges and eliminate recovery thesis.
Promoter Pledge Increase: Any rise above 98.25% pledge level or invocation of pledged shares would trigger severe governance concerns and forced selling.
Cash Burn Acceleration: Further negative operating cash flow in FY26 would deplete the ₹14 crores cash buffer and necessitate asset sales or fundraising.
Institutional Exit: FII holdings declining below 8% or complete exit would signal professional investors abandoning the stock amid deteriorating fundamentals.
Margin Compression: Operating margin falling below 15% would indicate inability to maintain cost discipline amid revenue pressures, accelerating profit erosion.
The Verdict: Exit Recommended on Deteriorating Fundamentals
Score: 28/100
For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions. The company's severe revenue decline (55.75% YoY to eight-quarter low of ₹17.80 crores), extreme promoter pledge (98.25%), poor earnings quality (other income at 42.54% of PBT), and negative five-year sales CAGR of 41.16% present unacceptable risk. Whilst the 8x P/E appears cheap, it reflects justified concerns about earnings sustainability. The "Negative" financial trend, "Mildly Bearish" technicals, and minimal institutional interest (9.28%) signal professional investors are steering clear. Wait for concrete evidence of operational turnaround and revenue stabilisation before considering entry.
For Existing Holders: Consider exiting positions on any price strength. The Q3 FY26 results confirm deteriorating trends rather than temporary setbacks, with no visible near-term catalyst for recovery. The company's debt-free status and ₹185.56 crores investment holdings provide some downside protection, but the extreme promoter pledge creates significant forced-selling risk. The downgrade from "Outstanding" to "Negative" financial trend and quality grade reduction to "Average" signal fundamental deterioration. Use any technical bounce towards ₹430-440 levels (20-day MA resistance) as exit opportunity rather than holding through further potential declines.
Fair Value Estimate: ₹320-350 (22% downside from current ₹409), based on normalised earnings of ₹25-30 crores annually (excluding one-off other income) at 10-12x P/E multiple appropriate for a company with negative growth, average quality, and high operational uncertainty.
Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)
⚠️ Investment Disclaimer
This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The views expressed are based on publicly available information as of January 30, 2026, and are subject to change.
