Forbes Precision Tools Q2 FY26: Strong Quarter Masks Deeper Concerns

Oct 31 2025 09:54 AM IST
share
Share Via
Forbes Precision Tools & Machine Parts Ltd. delivered a robust second quarter for FY2026, with net profit surging 117.85% quarter-on-quarter to ₹8.30 crores, though the ₹1,016 crore micro-cap engineering company continues to grapple with expensive valuations and structural growth challenges that have weighed on investor sentiment throughout the year.





Q2 FY26 Net Profit

₹8.30 Cr

▲ 117.85% QoQ



Revenue Growth (YoY)

+9.96%

₹63.27 Cr



Operating Margin

23.04%

▲ 6.99 pp QoQ



Return on Equity

17.29%

Strong Capital Efficiency




The September 2025 quarter marked a significant operational turnaround for the Mumbai-based manufacturer of engineering and machine parts, with revenues climbing 20.72% sequentially to ₹63.27 crores and operating margins expanding sharply to 23.04% from 16.05% in the previous quarter. However, the stock has tumbled 34.91% over the past year, dramatically underperforming both the Sensex's 6.32% gain and the industrial manufacturing sector's modest 3.69% decline, reflecting persistent investor concerns about stretched valuations and anaemic long-term growth.



Despite Wednesday's 5.33% intraday surge to ₹194.50 following the results announcement, Forbes Precision remains 39.97% below its 52-week high of ₹324.00 reached earlier this year. The company's proprietary Mojo score of 35 out of 100 continues to signal a "SELL" rating, unchanged since August 2025, as the stock trades at a demanding price-to-earnings multiple of 34 times trailing twelve-month earnings whilst delivering negative five-year operating profit growth.



Financial Performance: Margin Expansion Drives Profitability Surge



Forbes Precision's Q2 FY26 financial performance represented a marked improvement across virtually all metrics. Net sales of ₹63.27 crores reflected not only the 20.72% sequential acceleration but also a healthy 9.96% year-on-year advance, suggesting improved demand conditions for the company's engineering products and machine parts. On a half-yearly basis (H1 FY26), revenues totalled ₹115.68 crores, representing a modest 5.48% increase over the ₹109.31 crores recorded in H1 FY25.

























































Metric Q2 FY26 Q1 FY26 QoQ Change Q2 FY25 YoY Change
Net Sales ₹63.27 Cr ₹52.41 Cr +20.72% ₹57.54 Cr +9.96%
Operating Profit ₹14.58 Cr ₹8.41 Cr +73.36% ₹11.50 Cr +26.78%
Operating Margin 23.04% 16.05% +699 bps 19.99% +305 bps
Net Profit ₹8.30 Cr ₹3.81 Cr +117.85% ₹7.35 Cr +12.93%
PAT Margin 13.12% 7.27% +585 bps 12.77% +35 bps



The quarter's standout feature was the dramatic margin expansion, with operating profit excluding other income surging 73.36% quarter-on-quarter to ₹14.58 crores. The operating margin of 23.04% represented a substantial 699 basis point improvement from Q1 FY26's depressed 16.05% level, though it remained below the 28.15% achieved in March 2024. This margin recovery suggests improved operating leverage and potentially better cost management, though the company's employee costs declined to ₹10.83 crores from ₹11.31 crores sequentially, raising questions about workforce stability.



Net profit of ₹8.30 crores marked the second-highest quarterly profit in recent history, trailing only the ₹10.80 crores recorded in March 2024. The effective tax rate of 24.89% remained relatively stable, whilst interest costs continued their downward trajectory to just ₹0.37 crores, reflecting the company's minimal debt burden. Depreciation of ₹3.88 crores represented a modest sequential increase, consistent with ongoing capital expenditure to support manufacturing operations.




Quality of Earnings: Strong but Volatile


Forbes Precision's earnings quality remains robust, underpinned by a virtually debt-free balance sheet with net debt-to-equity of negative 0.17 (indicating net cash position) and exceptional interest coverage of 33.40 times. However, the significant quarter-to-quarter profit volatility—ranging from ₹3.81 crores to ₹10.80 crores over recent quarters—raises concerns about earnings predictability and business cyclicality that investors must carefully monitor.




Operational Excellence Clouded by Growth Stagnation



Whilst Forbes Precision demonstrates operational competence through its strong return on equity of 17.29% and return on capital employed of 28.99%—both well above industry averages—the company's growth trajectory presents a troubling picture. Over the past five years, sales have expanded at an anaemic 1.80% annual rate, whilst operating profit has actually contracted at a 5.76% annual pace, signalling fundamental challenges in scaling the business profitably.



The company's balance sheet remains a source of strength, with shareholder funds of ₹166.24 crores as of March 2025, up from ₹137.75 crores a year earlier. Long-term debt stood at just ₹14.87 crores, representing a debt-to-EBITDA ratio of merely 0.31, providing substantial financial flexibility. Fixed assets of ₹99.86 crores and current assets of ₹119.90 crores suggest a reasonably asset-light business model with sales-to-capital employed of 1.40 times.




⚠ Growth Concerns Require Monitoring


Structural Growth Challenge: The company's negative five-year operating profit growth of 5.76% annually represents a significant red flag, particularly when combined with minimal sales growth of just 1.80% annually. This stagnation suggests either market share losses, pricing pressures, or structural industry headwinds that management has yet to adequately address. Investors should closely scrutinise management commentary on growth initiatives and market positioning in upcoming investor interactions.




The Valuation Conundrum: Expensive Multiple for Modest Growth



Forbes Precision's most significant challenge lies in its valuation disconnect. Trading at a price-to-earnings ratio of 34 times trailing earnings and price-to-book value of 5.73 times, the stock commands premium multiples despite delivering below-average growth. The current valuation grade of "EXPENSIVE" reflects this misalignment, with the stock having oscillated between "EXPENSIVE" and "VERY EXPENSIVE" throughout 2025.



The company's enterprise value-to-EBITDA multiple of 18.53 times appears stretched when compared to its growth profile, whilst the EV-to-sales ratio of 3.96 times suggests the market is pricing in substantial margin expansion or revenue acceleration that has yet to materialise. With a PEG ratio unavailable due to negative historical growth, traditional growth-adjusted valuation metrics offer little support for the current price level.







































Valuation Metric Current Value Assessment
P/E Ratio (TTM) 34.37x Above sector average
Price to Book Value 5.73x Premium to peers
EV/EBITDA 18.53x Elevated for growth profile
Dividend Yield 2.71% Moderate income component
Valuation Grade EXPENSIVE Limited margin of safety



The dividend yield of 2.71%, based on the latest dividend of ₹5.00 per share, provides some income support but is offset by an extremely high payout ratio of 89.74%, leaving minimal capital for reinvestment and growth initiatives. This elevated payout suggests management's own scepticism about high-return growth opportunities, a concerning signal for a company trading at growth-stock valuations.



Peer Comparison: Premium Valuation with Superior Returns



When benchmarked against industrial manufacturing peers, Forbes Precision presents a mixed picture. The company's return on equity of 17.29% substantially exceeds the peer average of approximately 7%, justifying some valuation premium. However, the price-to-book ratio of 5.73 times significantly surpasses peers like Eimco Elecon (2.83x), Gala Precision Engineering (3.76x), and Kabra Extrusion (1.85x), suggesting the market may be overestimating the sustainability of Forbes' profitability advantage.

































































Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE Div Yield Debt/Equity
Forbes Precision 34.37x 5.73x 17.29% 2.71% -0.17
Eimco Elecon 28.30x 2.83x 4.92% 0.26% -0.04
Fabtech Tech 31.70x 0.53x 0.00% 0.00
Gala Precision Eng 35.38x 3.76x 10.54% -0.14
Airfloa Rail 35.82x 8.44x 11.56% 0.00
Kabra Extrusion 57.91x 1.85x 8.11% 1.02% 0.14



Forbes Precision's P/E ratio of 34.37 times sits comfortably within the peer range, below Kabra Extrusion's 57.91 times but above Eimco Elecon's 28.30 times. The company's superior ROE provides fundamental support for this positioning, though the disconnect between current profitability and historical growth rates suggests this premium may be vulnerable to any signs of margin pressure or market share erosion in coming quarters.



Shareholding Pattern: Promoter Stake Reduction Raises Eyebrows



A notable development in Forbes Precision's shareholding structure has been the reduction in promoter holding from 98.25% as of March 2025 to 94.40% by June 2025, with the stake remaining unchanged through September 2025. This 3.85 percentage point decline represents a significant shift in ownership structure, with the Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Private Limited holding 69.71% and Forbes Campbell Finance Limited maintaining 4.14%.



















































Shareholder Category Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 QoQ Change
Promoter 94.40% 94.40% 98.25% 0.00%
FII 10.94% 10.94% 11.09% 0.00%
Mutual Funds 0.27% 0.29% 0.29% -0.02%
Other DII 0.33% 0.33% 0.33% 0.00%
Non-Institutional 14.61% 14.59% 14.44% +0.02%



Foreign institutional investor holdings have remained relatively stable at 10.94%, representing five FII entities, whilst mutual fund participation remains minimal at just 0.27% with only one fund holding positions. The absence of insurance company holdings and limited institutional participation of 11.54% overall suggests the stock remains largely off the radar of mainstream institutional investors, contributing to its liquidity constraints and volatility.



Stock Performance: Severe Underperformance Across All Timeframes



Forbes Precision's stock price performance has been dismal across virtually all measurement periods, with the shares generating negative alpha relative to both the Sensex and the industrial manufacturing sector. The one-year return of negative 34.91% compares unfavourably to the Sensex's 6.32% gain, resulting in alpha of negative 41.23 percentage points. Year-to-date, the stock has plummeted 31.66% whilst the broader market has advanced 8.02%.



















































Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week +15.23% +0.23% +15.00%
1 Month +14.88% +4.23% +10.65%
3 Months -3.19% +3.97% -7.16%
6 Months -2.33% +5.19% -7.52%
Year-to-Date -31.66% +8.02% -39.68%
1 Year -34.91% +6.32% -41.23%



Recent momentum has shown signs of improvement, with the stock rallying 15.23% over the past week and 14.88% over the month, generating positive alpha of 15.00 and 10.65 percentage points respectively. However, this bounce appears more tactical than structural, with the stock still trading in a "MILDLY BEARISH" technical trend according to proprietary technical indicators, having shifted from "BEARISH" on October 6, 2025.



The stock's high beta of 1.50 indicates significantly greater volatility than the broader market, with annualised volatility of 44.90% compared to the Sensex's 12.50%. This elevated risk profile, combined with negative risk-adjusted returns of negative 0.78, places Forbes Precision firmly in the "HIGH RISK LOW RETURN" category—an unattractive combination for most investor profiles.




"Whilst the Q2 results demonstrate operational capability, the persistent disconnect between expensive valuations and anaemic long-term growth creates a challenging risk-reward proposition for investors at current levels."


Investment Thesis: Quality Business, Questionable Entry Point



Forbes Precision Tools presents a paradox: a fundamentally sound business with strong profitability metrics trading at valuations that discount growth the company has failed to deliver. The proprietary Mojo scoring framework assigns the stock just 35 out of 100 points, firmly in "SELL" territory, reflecting the confluence of expensive valuations, flat near-term financial trends, and bearish technical momentum.



The company's "AVERAGE" quality grade acknowledges its strong balance sheet, excellent return ratios, and minimal leverage, but these positives are insufficient to overcome the valuation hurdle. With the stock trading at 34 times earnings whilst delivering negative five-year operating profit growth, the margin of safety appears inadequate for new investors. The "FLAT" financial trend designation for the most recent quarter, despite the strong absolute numbers, reflects the ongoing volatility and lack of consistent growth trajectory.



Key Strengths & Risk Factors





✓ KEY STRENGTHS



  • Exceptional Capital Efficiency: ROE of 17.29% and ROCE of 28.99% demonstrate superior asset utilisation and profitability generation compared to industry peers

  • Fortress Balance Sheet: Net cash position with debt-to-equity of negative 0.17 and minimal interest burden provides financial flexibility and resilience

  • Strong Interest Coverage: EBIT-to-interest ratio of 33.40 times ensures comfortable debt servicing capacity despite minimal borrowings

  • Margin Recovery Capability: Q2 FY26 operating margin expansion to 23.04% demonstrates ability to improve profitability when revenue growth materialises

  • Consistent Dividend Payer: Dividend yield of 2.71% provides income support, though high payout ratio limits growth reinvestment

  • Promoter-Controlled Structure: 94.40% promoter holding ensures alignment of interests and strategic stability

  • Asset-Light Model: Sales-to-capital employed of 1.40 times suggests relatively efficient capital deployment




⚠ KEY CONCERNS



  • Structural Growth Stagnation: Five-year sales growth of just 1.80% annually and negative operating profit growth of 5.76% annually signal fundamental scaling challenges

  • Expensive Valuation: P/E of 34x and P/BV of 5.73x appear unjustified given historical growth profile, creating significant downside risk

  • Severe Stock Underperformance: One-year return of negative 34.91% and YTD decline of 31.66% reflect persistent investor scepticism

  • High Volatility Profile: Beta of 1.50 and annualised volatility of 44.90% create uncomfortable ride for risk-averse investors

  • Limited Institutional Interest: Total institutional holding of just 11.54% suggests mainstream investors remain unconvinced by the investment case

  • Earnings Volatility: Quarterly profit swings from ₹3.81 crores to ₹10.80 crores raise questions about business predictability and sustainability

  • Minimal Reinvestment: Dividend payout ratio of 89.74% leaves limited capital for growth initiatives or capacity expansion





Outlook: What Lies Ahead





POSITIVE CATALYSTS



  • Sustained Margin Improvement: If Q2 FY26's 23% operating margin proves sustainable rather than cyclical, profitability could surprise positively

  • Revenue Growth Acceleration: Sequential momentum of 20.72% QoQ, if maintained, could begin addressing growth concerns

  • Valuation Mean Reversion: Current 40% discount from 52-week high creates tactical opportunity if fundamentals stabilise

  • Technical Trend Reversal: Recent shift from "BEARISH" to "MILDLY BEARISH" could presage broader sentiment improvement




RED FLAGS TO MONITOR



  • Margin Sustainability Risk: Reversion to Q1 FY26's depressed 16% margins would severely damage investment thesis

  • Growth Momentum Fading: Any sequential revenue deceleration would reinforce concerns about structural growth limitations

  • Further Promoter Stake Reduction: Additional selling by promoters from current 94.40% would signal concerning lack of confidence

  • Valuation Grade Deterioration: Shift from "EXPENSIVE" to "VERY EXPENSIVE" would further compress multiples





The path forward for Forbes Precision hinges critically on management's ability to translate the strong Q2 FY26 performance into a sustainable growth trajectory. Investors should monitor upcoming quarters for evidence that the margin expansion and revenue acceleration represent a structural shift rather than cyclical uptick. The company's next investor presentation and annual report will be crucial for understanding strategic initiatives to address the five-year growth stagnation that has plagued the business.



From a technical perspective, the stock's position above all key moving averages—5-day, 20-day, 50-day, 100-day, and 200-day—provides short-term support, though the "MILDLY BEARISH" overall trend designation suggests caution. A decisive break above ₹200 with sustained volume could trigger momentum-driven buying, whilst failure to hold the ₹170-175 zone could precipitate another leg down towards the 52-week low of ₹142.50.




The Verdict: Avoid at Current Valuations


SELL

Score: 35/100


For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions at current levels. The expensive valuation of 34 times earnings combined with structural growth challenges of negative 5.76% five-year operating profit growth creates an unfavourable risk-reward equation. Wait for either meaningful valuation compression below 25 times earnings or concrete evidence of sustained revenue and profit growth acceleration before considering entry.


For Existing Holders: Consider reducing exposure on any rallies towards ₹210-220 levels. Whilst the Q2 FY26 results were encouraging, the persistent disconnect between valuation and growth, combined with severe one-year underperformance of 34.91%, suggests the market remains sceptical. Maintain stop-loss discipline and reassess holdings if the stock breaks below ₹170 on a closing basis.


Fair Value Estimate: ₹145-160 (25% downside from current levels), based on normalised earnings multiple of 22-24 times applied to trailing twelve-month EPS, adjusted for growth profile and sector comparables.


Rationale: Despite strong profitability metrics including 17.29% ROE and a fortress balance sheet, Forbes Precision's expensive valuation cannot be justified by its anaemic 1.80% five-year sales growth and negative operating profit growth. The stock's classification in the "HIGH RISK LOW RETURN" category, combined with its "SELL" rating and 35/100 Mojo score, reflects fundamental concerns that one strong quarter cannot overcome. Until the company demonstrates consistent growth acceleration or valuations compress meaningfully, the risk-reward remains tilted unfavourably for investors.





⚠️ Investment Disclaimer


This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.





{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News