The company's stock price closed at ₹176.70 on February 06, 2026, down 7.49% from the previous close of ₹191.00, reflecting investor concerns over the deteriorating profitability trajectory. Trading at a price-to-book value of 0.74x, the stock has declined 19.68% over the past three months, significantly underperforming the broader market.
Glance Finance operates in the money market operations segment, having dissolved its steel business partnership in December 2011. The company's financial performance has been characterised by extreme revenue volatility and weak profitability metrics, raising serious questions about business sustainability and operational consistency.
| Quarter | Net Sales (₹ Cr) | QoQ Change | Net Profit (₹ Cr) | QoQ Change | PAT Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep'25 | 7.96 | +895.00% | 0.07 | -65.00% | 0.88% |
| Jun'25 | 0.80 | -8.05% | 0.20 | +1900.00% | 25.00% |
| Mar'25 | 0.87 | -78.99% | 0.01 | -97.56% | 1.15% |
| Dec'24 | 4.14 | -61.77% | 0.41 | -58.16% | 9.90% |
| Sep'24 | 10.83 | +1270.89% | 0.98 | +7.69% | 9.05% |
| Jun'24 | 0.79 | -88.73% | 0.91 | +59.65% | 115.19% |
| Mar'24 | 7.01 | — | 0.57 | — | 8.13% |
Financial Performance: Erratic Revenue Pattern Crushes Profitability
In Q2 FY26, Glance Finance reported net sales of ₹7.96 crores, representing a dramatic 895.00% quarter-on-quarter surge from ₹0.80 crores in Q1 FY26. However, this seemingly impressive growth masks deeper operational inconsistencies, as the company's revenue pattern over the past eight quarters reveals wild fluctuations ranging from a low of ₹0.79 crores to a high of ₹10.83 crores.
Despite the revenue spike in Q2 FY26, net profit collapsed to ₹0.07 crores from ₹0.20 crores in the previous quarter, representing a 65.00% sequential decline. Year-on-year comparison reveals an even more alarming picture, with net profit plummeting 92.86% from ₹0.98 crores in Sep'24. This disconnect between revenue growth and profit generation signals severe operational inefficiencies and margin compression.
The company's profit after tax margin contracted sharply to 0.88% in Q2 FY26 from 25.00% in the previous quarter, highlighting the poor quality of revenue generated. Operating profit margin (excluding other income) stood at 25.75%, down from 296.25% in Q1 FY26, though the comparison is distorted by the extremely low revenue base in the prior quarter.
A particularly concerning aspect is the extraordinarily high tax rate of 89.71% in Q2 FY26, which effectively wiped out most of the profit before tax of ₹0.68 crores. This compares to a tax rate of 77.01% in Q1 FY26 and represents a significant deviation from normal corporate tax rates, suggesting possible tax adjustments or non-recurring items that the company has not adequately explained.
On a half-yearly basis (H1 FY26), the company reported net sales of ₹8.76 crores and net profit of ₹0.27 crores, representing a 27.63% decline in sales and 55.65% drop in profit compared to the corresponding period last year. This underscores the structural challenges facing the business beyond quarterly volatility.
Capital Efficiency Crisis: ROE Signals Fundamental Weakness
Glance Finance's return on equity (ROE) stands at a dismal 1.29% for the latest period, far below acceptable standards for financial services companies. This weak ROE indicates extremely poor capital efficiency, suggesting the company is generating minimal returns for its shareholders relative to the equity capital employed. The average ROE over the past five years stands at 4.20%, which, while slightly better, still reflects chronically weak profitability.
The company's balance sheet reveals shareholder funds of ₹44.71 crores as of March 2025, comprising share capital of ₹2.28 crores and reserves of ₹42.44 crores. With current assets of ₹28.25 crores and fixed assets of ₹15.82 crores, the company maintains a relatively conservative leverage profile with negligible long-term debt. However, the inability to generate adequate returns from this capital base remains a critical concern.
Critical Red Flag: Deteriorating Capital Productivity
With ROE at 1.29% and average ROE of 4.20%, Glance Finance demonstrates alarmingly weak capital efficiency. For context, even a risk-free fixed deposit offers better returns than what this NBFC generates on shareholder equity. The company's return on capital employed (ROCE) of 5.60% further confirms the systemic inability to deploy capital productively, raising fundamental questions about business viability.
The company's fixed asset base declined from ₹23.01 crores in March 2024 to ₹15.82 crores in March 2025, suggesting either asset disposals or aggressive depreciation. Depreciation charges of ₹1.29 crores in Q2 FY26 continue to weigh heavily on profitability, representing a significant portion of operating profit.
Current liabilities stood at ₹11.96 crores as of March 2025, down from ₹13.84 crores in the previous year, indicating improved working capital management. However, with current assets of ₹28.25 crores, the company maintains adequate liquidity to meet short-term obligations, which is one of the few positive aspects of its financial position.
NBFC Sector Context: Glance Finance Lags Industry Standards
The broader NBFC sector has delivered returns of 19.84% over the past year, significantly outperforming Glance Finance's 15.38% return. This 4.46 percentage point underperformance reflects investor scepticism about the company's operational model and growth prospects. While the sector has benefited from strong credit demand and improving asset quality metrics, Glance Finance has failed to capitalise on these tailwinds.
The company's business model, focused on money market operations, lacks the scale and diversification of larger NBFCs. With no institutional holdings from foreign institutional investors (FIIs), mutual funds, or insurance companies, the stock remains entirely in the hands of promoters (74.34%) and non-institutional investors (25.66%), limiting liquidity and professional oversight.
Shareholding Pattern: Zero Institutional Confidence
The complete absence of institutional investors in Glance Finance's shareholding structure speaks volumes about professional money managers' assessment of the company's prospects. With promoters holding a stable 74.34% stake across the past five quarters and no changes in shareholding pattern, the stock lacks the validation that comes from institutional participation. This raises concerns about corporate governance, transparency, and growth potential.
| Quarter | Promoter % | FII % | MF % | Insurance % | Non-Inst % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec'25 | 74.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 25.66% |
| Sep'25 | 74.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 25.66% |
| Jun'25 | 74.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 25.66% |
| Mar'25 | 74.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 25.66% |
| Dec'24 | 74.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 25.66% |
Peer Comparison: Valuation Premium Without Performance Justification
When compared to peers in the NBFC space, Glance Finance trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of 57.77x, significantly higher than the industry average P/E of 22x. This valuation premium appears unjustified given the company's weak ROE of 4.20%, which lags most comparable firms. Continental Securities, for instance, trades at 23.85x P/E with a superior ROE of 7.70%, whilst HB Stockholdings demonstrates much stronger capital efficiency with ROE of 17.17%.
| Company | P/E (TTM) | P/BV | ROE % | Debt/Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glance Finance | 57.77 | 0.74 | 4.20% | 0.03 |
| Srestha Finvest | NA (Loss Making) | 0.28 | 3.70% | 0.29 |
| Mega Corp. | 55.65 | 1.43 | 1.10% | 1.14 |
| Cont. Securities | 23.85 | 2.01 | 7.70% | 0.01 |
| Savani Financial | NA (Loss Making) | 1.40 | 0.79% | 1.31 |
| HB Stockholdings | NA (Loss Making) | 0.50 | 17.17% | 0.13 |
Glance Finance's price-to-book value of 0.74x suggests the market values the company below its book value, which typically indicates concerns about asset quality or earnings sustainability. Whilst this appears attractive on the surface, the weak ROE means the company is destroying shareholder value rather than creating it, making the discount justified rather than representing a buying opportunity.
The company's debt-to-equity ratio of 0.03 is amongst the lowest in the peer group, indicating conservative leverage. However, this financial prudence has not translated into superior returns, as evidenced by the anaemic ROE. With a market capitalisation of just ₹43.00 crores, Glance Finance ranks at the bottom of its peer group in terms of scale, limiting its ability to compete effectively.
Valuation Analysis: Expensive Multiple for Deteriorating Fundamentals
Glance Finance's current valuation metrics paint a troubling picture. Trading at a P/E ratio of 57.77x, the stock commands a 162% premium to the industry average of 22x, despite delivering inferior returns on equity and demonstrating erratic profitability. The valuation grade has oscillated between "Expensive" and "Very Expensive" over recent months, with the current assessment firmly in "Very Expensive" territory.
The company's enterprise value to EBITDA multiple of 4.56x and EV to EBIT multiple of 13.27x appear relatively modest, but these metrics are distorted by the volatile nature of the company's earnings. With profit after tax of just ₹0.07 crores in Q2 FY26, the sustainability of even these modest multiples remains questionable.
The stock has traded in a wide range over the past year, touching a 52-week high of ₹251.95 and a low of ₹120.10. Currently at ₹176.70, the stock sits 29.87% below its 52-week high and 47.13% above its 52-week low. This volatility reflects the market's uncertainty about the company's earnings trajectory and business model sustainability.
Notably, Glance Finance has not paid any dividend since September 2015, when it distributed ₹0.70 per share. For a financial services company with over a decade of operations, the absence of dividend distribution signals management's lack of confidence in sustainable cash generation or alternative priorities for capital allocation.
Stock Performance: Short-Term Gains Mask Long-Term Concerns
Glance Finance has delivered a one-year return of 15.38%, outperforming the Sensex's 7.07% gain and generating positive alpha of 8.31 percentage points. However, this performance deteriorates significantly when examined over shorter timeframes. The stock has declined 7.49% in the past day, 10.28% over the past week, and 19.68% over the past three months, indicating mounting selling pressure.
| Period | Stock Return | Sensex Return | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Day | -7.49% | +0.32% | -7.81% |
| 1 Week | -10.28% | +1.59% | -11.87% |
| 1 Month | -1.83% | -1.74% | -0.09% |
| 3 Month | -19.68% | +0.32% | -20.00% |
| 6 Month | -7.00% | +3.77% | -10.77% |
| YTD | -3.68% | -1.92% | -1.76% |
| 1 Year | +15.38% | +7.07% | +8.31% |
| 2 Years | +81.14% | +15.78% | +65.36% |
| 3 Years | +204.66% | +38.13% | +166.53% |
The longer-term picture appears more favourable, with two-year returns of 81.14% and three-year returns of 204.66%, both significantly outperforming the benchmark. However, these gains must be contextualised against the stock's extreme volatility, with a beta of 1.50 indicating 50% higher volatility than the broader market. The risk-adjusted return of 0.18 over the past year, compared to the Sensex's 0.61, suggests investors are taking on substantial additional risk without commensurate reward.
Technical indicators paint a mixed picture. The stock currently trades below its 5-day, 20-day, 50-day, 100-day, and 200-day moving averages, signalling weakness across multiple timeframes. The overall technical trend has shifted to "Sideways" as of February 06, 2026, down from "Mildly Bullish" previously. Weekly and monthly MACD indicators both show "Mildly Bearish" signals, whilst Bollinger Bands indicate "Bearish" on the weekly chart.
Investment Thesis: Fundamental Weaknesses Outweigh Valuation Discount
The investment case for Glance Finance is severely compromised by multiple structural weaknesses. The company's Mojo Score of 27 out of 100 places it firmly in "Strong Sell" territory, with the score having declined from 36 (Sell) in October 2025. This deterioration reflects the worsening financial trend and persistent quality concerns.
The company's quality assessment as "Below Average" stems from its weak long-term financial performance, with average ROE of just 4.20% and inconsistent profitability. Whilst the five-year sales growth of 46.08% appears impressive, this has not translated into proportionate profit growth or improved return ratios, suggesting operational inefficiencies and margin pressures.
The financial trend assessment of "Flat" for Q2 FY26 masks the underlying deterioration in profitability metrics. The company's inability to convert revenue growth into sustainable profit generation represents a fundamental flaw in its business model. With operating cash flow of ₹11.00 crores in FY25 being largely consumed by investing activities, the company's capital allocation decisions warrant scrutiny.
Key Strengths & Risk Factors
Key Strengths
- Conservative leverage with debt-to-equity ratio of 0.03, providing financial stability
- Five-year sales CAGR of 46.08% demonstrates revenue generation capability
- Adequate liquidity with current assets of ₹28.25 crores against current liabilities of ₹11.96 crores
- Stable promoter holding at 74.34% with no pledging of shares
- Long-term stock performance with three-year returns of 204.66%
Key Concerns
- Extremely weak ROE of 1.29% (latest) and 4.20% (5-year average) indicating poor capital efficiency
- Highly erratic quarterly revenue pattern undermining business predictability
- Sharp profit decline of 92.86% YoY in Q2 FY26 despite revenue growth
- Zero institutional holdings reflecting lack of professional investor confidence
- Abnormally high tax rate of 89.71% in Q2 FY26 raising questions about tax management
- Trading at expensive valuation (P/E: 57.77x) without fundamental justification
- No dividend distribution since September 2015 despite decade-long operations
Outlook: Limited Visibility on Turnaround Prospects
The outlook for Glance Finance remains clouded by fundamental operational challenges and the absence of clear catalysts for improvement. The company's business model in money market operations has failed to demonstrate scalability or consistent profitability over multiple years. Without significant strategic changes or business model evolution, the path to sustainable value creation remains unclear.
Positive Catalysts
- Improvement in quarterly profit consistency and margin stability
- Meaningful uptick in ROE above 10% threshold
- Entry of institutional investors signalling improved confidence
- Resumption of dividend payments indicating sustainable cash generation
Red Flags
- Further deterioration in quarterly profitability or margin compression
- Continued absence of institutional investor participation
- Persistent abnormal tax rates without adequate explanation
- Decline in promoter holding or emergence of share pledging
- Failure to demonstrate business model scalability
For the company to merit investor attention, it would need to demonstrate at least four consecutive quarters of stable revenue generation, profit margins above 15%, and ROE exceeding 12%. Currently, none of these conditions are met, and the trajectory suggests further challenges ahead rather than improvement.
The Verdict: Structural Flaws Warrant Exit
Score: 27/100
For Fresh Investors: Avoid entirely. The combination of weak ROE (1.29%), erratic profitability, expensive valuation (P/E: 57.77x), and zero institutional confidence makes this an unsuitable investment. Better opportunities exist in the NBFC space with stronger fundamentals and proven track records.
For Existing Holders: Consider exiting on any price strength. The 92.86% year-on-year profit decline in Q2 FY26, coupled with deteriorating financial trends and technical weakness, suggests further downside risk. The absence of dividend income provides no cushion whilst waiting for a turnaround that may never materialise.
Fair Value Estimate: ₹120-140 (32% downside from current levels), based on normalised earnings and peer group P/BV multiples of 0.5-0.6x applied to book value of ₹196.52 per share.
Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)
⚠️ Investment Disclaimer
This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
