Graviss Hospitality Q3 FY26: Stellar Turnaround Masks Deeper Structural Concerns

Feb 12 2026 05:33 PM IST
share
Share Via
Graviss Hospitality Limited, the owner of the InterContinental hotel at Marine Drive, Mumbai, reported a remarkable quarterly turnaround in Q3 FY26 with net profit of ₹3.00 crores, reversing from losses of ₹1.30 crores in Q2 FY26 and marking a 112.77% year-on-year surge. However, the micro-cap hospitality player's shares plunged 25.51% over the past year despite this quarter's recovery, closing at ₹35.01 on February 12, 2026, with a market capitalisation of ₹223.00 crores. The stock's dramatic 10.51% single-day surge following the results announcement reflects investor relief rather than conviction, as deeper structural weaknesses continue to plague the company's investment thesis.
Graviss Hospitality Q3 FY26: Stellar Turnaround Masks Deeper Structural Concerns
Net Profit (Q3 FY26)
₹3.00 Cr
QoQ: +330.77% | YoY: +112.77%
Revenue (Q3 FY26)
₹19.11 Cr
QoQ: +55.87% | YoY: +6.28%
Operating Margin
26.32%
Highest in 8 quarters
Return on Equity
1.87%
Weak capital efficiency

The December 2025 quarter represented a stark reversal from the company's dismal first-half performance, where Graviss accumulated losses totalling ₹3.53 crores across Q1 and Q2 FY26. Net sales surged 55.87% quarter-on-quarter to ₹19.11 crores, driven by strong seasonal demand in Mumbai's hospitality sector during the festive and wedding season. The operating profit margin expanded dramatically to 26.32% from negative territory in the previous quarter, reflecting both improved pricing power and better cost management at the Marine Drive property.

However, the nine-month FY26 picture remains troubling. Revenue for the April-December 2025 period stood at ₹43.07 crores, representing modest growth of just 3.19% compared to ₹41.70 crores in the corresponding period of FY25. More concerning, net profit for the nine-month period collapsed to ₹0.47 crores from ₹9.62 crores in 9M FY25, marking a devastating 95.11% decline. This stark deterioration underscores the fragility of the company's earnings profile and raises serious questions about sustainability beyond seasonal peaks.

Quarter Revenue (₹ Cr) QoQ Growth Net Profit (₹ Cr) QoQ Growth Operating Margin
Dec'25 19.11 +55.87% 3.00 +330.77% 26.32%
Sep'25 12.26 +4.79% -1.30 -41.70% -2.85%
Jun'25 11.70 -39.81% -2.23 +869.57% -11.62%
Mar'25 19.44 +8.12% -0.23 -116.31% 10.96%
Dec'24 17.98 +42.70% 1.41 -84.18% 21.08%
Sep'24 12.60 +13.31% 8.91 +1372.86% 7.22%
Jun'24 11.12 -0.70 1.62%

Financial Performance: Volatile Earnings Trajectory Raises Red Flags

The wild swings in Graviss Hospitality's quarterly performance reveal a business struggling with fundamental operational consistency. Q3 FY26's stellar operating margin of 26.32% stands in sharp contrast to the negative margins of -2.85% and -11.62% recorded in the preceding two quarters. This volatility stems from the company's single-property exposure and Mumbai's seasonal hospitality dynamics, where peak wedding and corporate event seasons drive disproportionate revenue concentration.

Revenue growth on a year-on-year basis remained anaemic at 6.28% in Q3 FY26, significantly underperforming the broader Hotels & Resorts sector's recovery trajectory. The company's inability to sustain momentum beyond peak quarters is evident in its half-yearly performance, where H1 FY26 revenue of ₹23.96 crores grew just 2.05% compared to H1 FY25's ₹23.48 crores. Employee costs remained elevated at ₹3.51 crores in Q3, though better absorbed given the stronger revenue base.

Revenue (Q3 FY26)
₹19.11 Cr
QoQ: +55.87% | YoY: +6.28%
Net Profit (Q3 FY26)
₹3.00 Cr
QoQ: +330.77% | YoY: +112.77%
Operating Margin
26.32%
Vs -2.85% in Q2
PAT Margin
15.70%
Vs -10.60% in Q2

The quality of earnings remains questionable, with the company's tax rate exhibiting bizarre volatility – ranging from 7.98% in Q3 FY26 to -2021.43% in Sep'24 and 182.14% in Mar'25. This erratic tax treatment suggests accounting complexities or carry-forward losses being adjusted irregularly, making it difficult to assess the true underlying profitability. The company's average tax ratio over recent periods stands at just 3.52%, well below normalised rates, indicating substantial accumulated losses being set off.

Operational Challenges: Weak Capital Efficiency Undermines Value Creation

The most damning indictment of Graviss Hospitality's operational performance lies in its abysmal return ratios. The company's average Return on Equity (ROE) stands at a meagre 1.87%, indicating extremely poor capital efficiency and value destruction for shareholders. The latest ROE of -1.24% reflects the company's inability to generate consistent profits relative to its shareholder equity base of ₹192.51 crores as of March 2025.

Even more concerning, the Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) averaged -1.62% over recent periods, with the latest reading at -1.21%. These negative returns indicate that the company is failing to generate adequate profits from the capital deployed in its business, a critical weakness for a capital-intensive hospitality operation. The EBIT to Interest coverage ratio averaged -2.89 times, signalling periods where operating profits failed to even cover modest interest obligations of ₹0.19 crores quarterly.

Critical Concern: Capital Efficiency Crisis

Graviss Hospitality's ROE of 1.87% ranks amongst the weakest in the hospitality sector, reflecting fundamental operational inefficiencies. With ₹192.51 crores of shareholder equity generating negligible returns, the company is effectively destroying shareholder value. The negative ROCE of -1.62% compounds this concern, indicating that even the broader capital base employed in the business is failing to generate adequate returns. This represents a structural challenge requiring comprehensive operational overhaul.

The balance sheet, while not heavily leveraged, offers little comfort. Long-term debt increased to ₹4.32 crores in FY25 from ₹0.80 crores in FY24, though absolute debt levels remain manageable with a Debt to EBITDA ratio of 0.18. Fixed assets stood at ₹193.46 crores, having increased from ₹182.17 crores, likely reflecting ongoing property maintenance and upgrades. However, with minimal cash generation and weak returns, the company's ability to fund future capital expenditure without diluting equity remains questionable.

Industry Context: Underperforming Peers Amid Hospitality Recovery

The Indian hospitality sector has witnessed robust recovery post-pandemic, with premium hotels in gateway cities like Mumbai commanding strong pricing power. However, Graviss Hospitality has conspicuously failed to capitalise on this favourable industry backdrop. The company's 1-year stock return of -25.51% significantly underperformed the Hotels & Resorts sector's -3.85% decline, resulting in a negative alpha of -21.66 percentage points.

This underperformance stems from several factors: single-property risk concentration, operational inefficiencies reflected in volatile margins, and the absence of a clear growth strategy. While larger peers have expanded room inventory, upgraded facilities, and diversified revenue streams through F&B and banqueting, Graviss remains tethered to the performance of its single Marine Drive property. The company's 5-year sales CAGR of 21.66% appears impressive but is distorted by the low pandemic base of FY21-22.

Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE (%) Debt/Equity
Graviss Hospitality NA (Loss Making) 1.31x 1.87% 0.02
Sayaji Hotels (Pune) 12.94x 2.74x 22.29% -0.07
Sayaji Hotels (Indore) 21.48x 4.22x 15.37% 0.83
Asian Hotels (East) 184.44x 1.11x 3.62% 1.51
Phoenix Township 97.69x 0.67x 1.09% 0.78
Country Club Hospitality 27.54x 0.73x 1.44% 0.07

The peer comparison reveals Graviss trading at a loss-making valuation with no P/E ratio, while its Price-to-Book ratio of 1.31x appears reasonable only in isolation. When contextualised against the company's abysmal ROE of 1.87% – the second-lowest among peers – the valuation offers no margin of safety. Better-managed peers like Sayaji Hotels (Pune) command premium valuations of 2.74x P/BV justified by superior ROE of 22.29%, highlighting the valuation discount Graviss deserves for its operational underperformance.

Valuation Analysis: Risky Grade Reflects Fundamental Weakness

Graviss Hospitality's valuation grade of "RISKY" accurately captures the investment proposition's precarious nature. With the stock loss-making on a trailing twelve-month basis, traditional P/E valuation metrics are rendered meaningless. The EV/EBITDA multiple of 59.60x appears grotesquely expensive, though this is distorted by the low EBITDA base and negative EBIT resulting in an EV/EBIT of -107.23x.

The Price-to-Book ratio of 1.31x might superficially suggest the stock trades near book value, but this ignores the fundamental reality that the company generates negligible returns on that book value. With ROE at 1.87%, investors are paying ₹1.31 for every rupee of equity that generates less than 2 paise of annual profit – a value-destructive proposition by any measure. The company's valuation grade deteriorated to "RISKY" from "FAIR" in August 2025, reflecting the market's recognition of these structural weaknesses.

P/E Ratio (TTM)
NA
Loss Making
Price to Book
1.31x
Near book value
EV/EBITDA
59.60x
Expensive
Mojo Score
12/100
Strong Sell

The stock's 52-week range of ₹28.51 to ₹51.90 reflects extreme volatility, with the current price of ₹35.01 sitting 32.54% below the high and 22.80% above the low. This price action mirrors the company's erratic quarterly performance and lack of earnings visibility. The absence of any dividend yield (last dividend paid in February 2012) eliminates any income component to the investment case, leaving investors entirely dependent on capital appreciation driven by uncertain operational improvements.

Shareholding Pattern: Stable Promoter Base Offers Limited Comfort

The shareholding pattern reveals remarkable stability, with promoter holding locked at 74.92% across the past five quarters through December 2025. The promoter group, led by Satinetta Trading LLP (32.57%) and Graviss Holdings Private Limited (30.81%), demonstrates unwavering commitment to the business. The absence of any promoter pledging (0.0%) eliminates one potential risk factor and suggests the promoter group maintains financial stability despite the company's operational challenges.

Quarter Promoter % FII % MF % Non-Institutional %
Dec'25 74.92% 0.00% 0.00% 25.08%
Sep'25 74.92% 0.00% 0.00% 25.08%
Jun'25 74.92% 0.00% 0.00% 25.08%
Mar'25 74.92% 0.00% 0.00% 25.08%
Dec'24 74.92% 0.00% 0.00% 25.08%

However, the complete absence of institutional participation tells a more troubling story. Foreign Institutional Investors (FII), Mutual Funds, Insurance companies, and other Domestic Institutional Investors (DII) collectively hold 0.00% stake, indicating zero institutional confidence in the company's prospects. This institutional vacuum leaves the free float of 25.08% entirely in the hands of retail and non-institutional investors, contributing to the stock's high volatility (57.66%) and poor liquidity. The lack of institutional research coverage and analyst following further compounds the information asymmetry facing potential investors.

Stock Performance: Severe Underperformance Across All Timeframes

Graviss Hospitality's stock performance presents a dismal picture of consistent value destruction across multiple timeframes. The 1-year return of -25.51% dramatically underperformed the Sensex's +9.85% gain, resulting in a negative alpha of -35.36 percentage points. This underperformance accelerated over shorter periods, with the 6-month return of -20.07% trailing the Sensex by -24.36 percentage points, indicating deteriorating investor sentiment.

Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week +9.61% +0.43% +9.18%
1 Month +12.86% -0.24% +13.10%
3 Month -8.69% -0.94% -7.75%
6 Month -20.07% +4.29% -24.36%
YTD +4.41% -1.81% +6.22%
1 Year -25.51% +9.85% -35.36%
2 Years -37.21% +17.73% -54.94%
3 Years +51.89% +37.89% +14.00%

The recent 1-week and 1-month outperformance (+9.61% and +12.86% respectively) reflects tactical relief rallies following the Q3 results rather than any fundamental re-rating. The stock's high beta of 1.50 indicates significantly higher volatility than the broader market, with a standard deviation of 57.66% making it unsuitable for risk-averse investors. The technical trend remains firmly "BEARISH" since October 6, 2025, when the stock broke down from ₹42.69, with multiple moving averages (5-day, 20-day, 50-day, 100-day, and 200-day) all positioned above the current price, indicating strong overhead resistance.

The risk-adjusted return profile classifies Graviss as "HIGH RISK LOW RETURN" with a negative Sharpe ratio of -0.44 over the past year, meaning investors have been penalised with losses despite taking on substantial volatility. This compares unfavourably to the Sensex's positive risk-adjusted return of 0.86, underscoring the stock's poor risk-reward proposition. The 10-year return of +91.31% significantly lags the Sensex's +264.02%, resulting in a massive negative alpha of -172.71 percentage points over the longer term.

Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags Dominate the Narrative

The investment thesis for Graviss Hospitality is severely compromised by a confluence of negative factors across all critical parameters. The company's Mojo Score of 12/100 places it firmly in "STRONG SELL" territory, with the rating having deteriorated from "SELL" in August 2025. This comprehensive scoring system aggregates valuation (RISKY), quality (BELOW AVERAGE), financial trend (FLAT), and technical trend (BEARISH) into an overall assessment that leaves little room for optimism.

Valuation Grade
RISKY
Expensive vs fundamentals
Quality Grade
BELOW AVG
Weak ROE of 1.87%
Financial Trend
FLAT
No clear momentum
Technical Trend
BEARISH
Since Oct'25

The quality assessment of "BELOW AVERAGE" reflects the company's consistently weak return ratios, with average ROE of 1.87% and ROCE of -1.62% ranking amongst the poorest in the hospitality sector. While the company benefits from zero promoter pledging and a relatively clean balance sheet with low leverage (Debt to Equity of 0.02), these positives are overwhelmed by fundamental operational inefficiencies. The 5-year sales CAGR of 21.66%, while appearing robust, is distorted by the pandemic-depressed base and masks the company's inability to generate consistent profitability from this revenue growth.

"With ROE at 1.87% and nine-month FY26 profits collapsing 95%, Graviss Hospitality's Q3 recovery appears more seasonal aberration than sustainable turnaround."

Key Strengths & Risk Factors

KEY STRENGTHS

  • Prime Location: InterContinental at Marine Drive, Mumbai, represents a marquee address with strong brand equity and pricing power potential in India's financial capital.
  • Strong Q3 Turnaround: Net profit of ₹3.00 crores and operating margin of 26.32% demonstrate the property's earnings potential during peak seasons.
  • Clean Balance Sheet: Minimal leverage with Debt to Equity of 0.02 and Debt to EBITDA of 0.18 provides financial flexibility without solvency concerns.
  • Stable Promoter Base: 74.92% promoter holding with zero pledging indicates strong promoter commitment and eliminates governance risks.
  • Long Operating History: Established presence since 1959 with deep understanding of Mumbai's hospitality market dynamics.

KEY CONCERNS

  • Abysmal Capital Efficiency: ROE of 1.87% and negative ROCE of -1.62% indicate severe value destruction and operational inefficiencies requiring fundamental overhaul.
  • Extreme Earnings Volatility: Wild quarterly swings from ₹8.91 crores profit to ₹2.23 crores loss demonstrate unsustainable business model heavily dependent on seasonal factors.
  • Single Property Risk: Complete concentration in one Marine Drive hotel eliminates diversification and magnifies operational and location-specific risks.
  • Nine-Month Profit Collapse: 95.11% decline in 9M FY26 profits to ₹0.47 crores from ₹9.62 crores reveals structural weakness beyond quarterly noise.
  • Zero Institutional Interest: Complete absence of FII, MF, and DII holdings signals lack of confidence from sophisticated investors with better information access.
  • Bearish Technical Setup: Stock trading below all major moving averages with bearish trend since October 2025 indicates sustained selling pressure.
  • Weak Sector Performance: 1-year return of -25.51% underperforming Hotels & Resorts sector by -21.66 percentage points demonstrates company-specific issues beyond sector headwinds.

Outlook: What to Watch

POSITIVE CATALYSTS

  • Sustained quarterly profitability across all four quarters of FY27 demonstrating operational consistency beyond seasonal peaks
  • ROE improvement above 10% indicating meaningful progress in capital efficiency and value creation
  • Revenue diversification initiatives beyond room revenue through F&B, banqueting, and corporate events
  • Strategic property upgrades or renovations enhancing pricing power and average room rates
  • Entry of institutional investors or research coverage providing validation and improved liquidity

RED FLAGS TO MONITOR

  • Return to quarterly losses in Q4 FY26 or Q1 FY27 confirming Q3's performance as seasonal aberration rather than turnaround
  • Further deterioration in nine-month or annual profitability for FY26 below FY25 levels
  • Increasing debt levels or deteriorating interest coverage ratio necessitating external financing for working capital
  • Any promoter stake reduction or emergence of pledging indicating promoter confidence erosion
  • Continued technical breakdown below ₹28.51 (52-week low) accelerating bearish momentum

The Verdict: Exit Recommended

STRONG SELL

Score: 12/100

For Fresh Investors: Avoid entirely. The combination of abysmal ROE (1.87%), extreme earnings volatility, single-property concentration risk, and bearish technicals creates an unfavourable risk-reward proposition. Q3's strong performance appears seasonal rather than indicative of sustainable turnaround, with the nine-month profit collapse of 95% revealing deeper structural issues. Zero institutional participation and risky valuation grade further validate the avoid stance.

For Existing Holders: Consider exiting on any strength. The stock's recent relief rally following Q3 results presents an opportunity to exit before potential disappointment in subsequent quarters. With the investment thesis compromised across valuation, quality, and trend parameters, and the stock underperforming peers by over 21 percentage points annually, holding serves no strategic purpose. The micro-cap nature and poor liquidity may necessitate staggered exit to minimise market impact.

Fair Value Estimate: ₹22.00-25.00 (29% to 37% downside from current levels) – Based on 1.0-1.2x P/BV multiple applied to book value of ₹27.30, discounted for sub-par ROE and operational challenges. Current price of ₹35.01 offers no margin of safety given fundamental weaknesses.

Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)

⚠️ Investment Disclaimer

This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News