Gujarat Apollo Industries Q2 FY26: Core Operations Bleed Despite Other Income Cushion

The company's financial performance in Q2 FY26 reveals a troubling dichotomy: whilst revenue growth appears healthy at 31.13% year-on-year, the underlying operational health remains critically weak. Operating profit before depreciation, interest, and tax (PBDIT) excluding other income stood at negative ₹2.34 crores, translating to an operating margin of negative 18.15%. The company's survival hinges entirely on other income of ₹7.74 crores in Q2 FY26, which constitutes a staggering 258.00% of profit before tax. This dependency on non-operating income raises serious questions about the sustainability of the business model and the viability of core manufacturing operations.

Financial Performance: Revenue Growth Masks Operational Distress

Gujarat Apollo's Q2 FY26 financial performance presents a stark contrast between top-line growth and bottom-line deterioration. Net sales for the quarter reached ₹12.89 crores, representing robust growth of 31.13% year-on-year and 16.34% quarter-on-quarter. However, this revenue expansion has failed to translate into operational profitability. The company's gross profit margin improved sequentially to 34.52% in Q2 FY26 from 28.07% in Q1 FY26, yet remains substantially below the 63.58% achieved in Q2 FY25, indicating severe pricing pressure or adverse product mix shifts.

The operating profit excluding other income deteriorated to negative ₹2.34 crores in Q2 FY26, yielding a negative operating margin of 18.15%. Whilst this represents a marginal improvement from Q1 FY26's negative 21.03% margin, it remains substantially worse than Q2 FY25's negative 11.80% margin. Employee costs have risen to ₹2.47 crores in Q2 FY26 from ₹1.79 crores in Q2 FY25, representing a 38.00% year-on-year increase that significantly outpaces revenue growth. This cost inflation, combined with negative operating leverage, has crushed profitability at the operational level.

The profit after tax margin compressed dramatically to 14.66% in Q2 FY26 from 45.57% in Q2 FY25, reflecting the operational challenges. Interest costs surged 28.38% year-on-year to ₹0.95 crores, whilst depreciation increased 22.69% to ₹1.46 crores. The tax rate of 36.67% in Q2 FY26, though normalised compared to the anomalous negative 59.36% in Q4 FY25, remains elevated. On a half-yearly basis for H1 FY26, the company reported consolidated net profit of ₹3.49 crores, substantially lower than the ₹8.77 crores achieved in H1 FY25, representing a decline of 60.20%.

Operational Challenges: Core Business Remains Structurally Loss-Making

The fundamental issue plaguing Gujarat Apollo Industries is the persistent inability of its core manufacturing operations to generate positive operating cash flows. The company has reported negative operating profit (excluding other income) for at least six consecutive quarters, with losses ranging from ₹1.16 crores to ₹8.56 crores per quarter. This structural weakness suggests deep-seated problems in the business model, whether related to pricing power, cost structure, capacity utilisation, or competitive positioning in the industrial manufacturing sector.

Return on equity stands at a meagre 3.09% on average, significantly below acceptable thresholds for manufacturing businesses and indicative of poor capital efficiency. The company's return on capital employed (ROCE) is even more concerning at negative 2.33% on average, with the latest figure deteriorating to negative 3.49%. These metrics underscore the fundamental challenge: the business is destroying value rather than creating it. The sales to capital employed ratio of just 0.10x reveals severe underutilisation of assets, suggesting either substantial idle capacity or investments in non-productive assets.

The balance sheet reveals further concerns. Fixed assets increased to ₹127.98 crores in March 2025 from ₹107.95 crores in March 2024, representing a 18.56% increase, yet this capital expenditure has not translated into improved operational performance. Current assets stood at ₹215.02 crores with current liabilities of ₹53.81 crores, providing adequate liquidity but raising questions about working capital efficiency. Long-term debt increased to ₹9.78 crores from ₹5.09 crores, though leverage remains manageable with a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.10.

Cash Flow Crisis: Negative Operating Cash Generation

Gujarat Apollo's cash flow statement paints a particularly troubling picture. For the financial year ending March 2025, the company reported negative operating cash flow of ₹15.00 crores, marking the third consecutive year of cash burn from operations. This contrasts sharply with the positive cash flow from operations of ₹7.00 crores in FY24, indicating accelerating deterioration. The company has consumed ₹147.00 crores in cumulative operating cash flows over the past three years (FY23, FY24, FY25 data available), a staggering figure that raises serious concerns about business sustainability.

To fund this operational cash burn, Gujarat Apollo has relied on cash inflows from investing activities, generating ₹58.00 crores cumulatively over FY24 and FY25 (with ₹68.00 crores in FY23). This suggests the company has been liquidating investments or selling assets to support operations—a strategy that is inherently unsustainable over the long term. Cash flow from financing activities turned positive at ₹28.00 crores in FY25 after negative ₹10.00 crores in FY24, indicating increased borrowing or capital raising to bridge the cash gap.

Industry Leadership: How Gujarat Apollo Compares to Peers

Within the industrial manufacturing sector, Gujarat Apollo Industries occupies a precarious position. A comparison with sector peers reveals the company's relative weakness across key financial metrics, though its valuation reflects these challenges with a significantly lower price-to-book ratio and absence of a meaningful price-to-earnings multiple due to weak profitability.

Gujarat Apollo's return on equity of 3.09% ranks amongst the lowest in its peer group, substantially below the peer average of approximately 12.00%. Only Batliboi, at 4.17%, posts a comparably weak ROE. The company's price-to-book ratio of 1.27x appears superficially attractive compared to peers trading at 1.75x to 6.84x, but this discount reflects the market's recognition of poor capital efficiency and weak earnings power. The dividend yield of 0.38% is the lowest among peers, constrained by weak profitability despite a modest dividend payout ratio of 20.84%.

The absence of a meaningful P/E ratio due to the company's loss-making status on a trailing twelve-month basis distinguishes Gujarat Apollo from its peers, all of whom maintain positive earnings. Whilst the company's debt-to-equity ratio of 0.10 is among the lowest in the peer group, indicating conservative leverage, this financial strength has not translated into operational excellence. The market capitalisation of ₹634.00 crores positions Gujarat Apollo as the third-largest in its peer group, yet this scale advantage has not yielded competitive benefits in profitability or returns.

Valuation Analysis: Discount Justified by Fundamental Weakness

Gujarat Apollo Industries trades at a price-to-book value of 1.27x, representing a significant discount to the broader industrial manufacturing sector. However, this valuation discount appears entirely justified—if not insufficient—given the company's structural profitability challenges and negative return metrics. With ROE at 3.09% and ROCE at negative 2.33%, the company trades above its economic book value, suggesting the market still prices in optimism for a turnaround that has yet to materialise.

The enterprise value to sales ratio of 14.30x appears elevated for a company with negative operating margins, though this metric is distorted by the company's substantial other income and investment holdings. The negative EV/EBITDA of -44.53x and EV/EBIT of -32.38x reflect the operational losses, rendering these traditional valuation multiples meaningless. The company's valuation grade has been classified as "RISKY" since March 2015, reflecting persistent concerns about business quality and earnings sustainability.

At the current market price of ₹476.80, the stock trades 14.09% below its 52-week high of ₹555.00 reached earlier in the year, and 93.70% above its 52-week low of ₹246.15. This wide trading range reflects significant uncertainty and volatility in investor sentiment. The stock's distance from its 52-week high suggests recent momentum has stalled, whilst the substantial appreciation from the 52-week low indicates speculative interest that may not be grounded in fundamental improvement. The proprietary Mojo score of 31 out of 100 places the stock firmly in "SELL" territory, with the rating unchanged since October 2025.

Shareholding: Promoter Stake Reduction Raises Questions

Recent changes in Gujarat Apollo's shareholding pattern warrant close scrutiny. Promoter holding declined sharply to 47.30% in the quarter ending November 2025 from 51.99% in the previous quarter, representing a reduction of 4.69 percentage points. This marks the first change in promoter holding after remaining stable at 51.99% for multiple quarters. The reduction in promoter stake, whilst bringing their holding below the psychologically important 50% threshold, raises questions about promoter confidence in the business's near-term prospects.

The reduction in promoter stake has been absorbed entirely by non-institutional investors, whose holding increased to 52.70% from 48.01%, representing a gain of 4.69 percentage points. This shift from informed insider holdings to retail and non-institutional holdings is typically viewed negatively, as promoters generally have superior information about business prospects. The complete absence of institutional investor interest—with zero holdings from mutual funds, insurance companies, and negligible FII participation—further underscores concerns about the investment case.

The lack of institutional ownership is particularly telling. Not a single mutual fund holds shares in Gujarat Apollo, and FII holding stands at zero as of November 2025 after a brief appearance of 0.14% in June 2025. This institutional vacuum suggests professional investors have evaluated the company's fundamentals and chosen to allocate capital elsewhere. The absence of institutional scrutiny and research coverage also means the stock lacks the analytical rigour and price discovery mechanisms that typically benefit from institutional participation, leaving it largely in the hands of retail speculation.

Stock Performance: Volatility Masks Fundamental Deterioration

Gujarat Apollo's stock price performance over various timeframes reveals extreme volatility and recent momentum that appears disconnected from deteriorating fundamentals. The stock has delivered remarkable returns of 69.08% over the past year, substantially outperforming the Sensex's 9.48% gain by an alpha of 59.60 percentage points. Over longer periods, the outperformance persists: 109.44% over two years (alpha of 80.75 percentage points) and 139.54% over three years (alpha of 102.23 percentage points).

However, this price appreciation appears increasingly disconnected from underlying business performance. Whilst the stock has rallied 69.08% over the past year, consolidated net profit has declined 51.15% year-on-year in the most recent quarter, and operating losses have widened. The stock's three-month return of negative 1.67% (underperforming the Sensex by 5.85 percentage points) suggests recent momentum may be stalling as investors reassess the valuation in light of persistent operational challenges.

The stock exhibits high volatility with an annualised volatility of 56.51% over the past year, classifying it as a "HIGH RISK HIGH RETURN" investment. The beta of 1.50 indicates the stock is 50% more volatile than the broader market, amplifying both gains and losses. Recent trading has been characterised by low volumes, with only 1,133 shares traded on November 18, 2025, suggesting limited liquidity and the potential for sharp price movements on modest order flow. The stock trades above all key moving averages (5-day, 20-day, 50-day, 100-day, and 200-day), indicating technical strength despite fundamental concerns.

Investment Thesis: Speculative Bet with Substantial Downside Risk

The investment thesis for Gujarat Apollo Industries rests precariously on the hope of an operational turnaround that has yet to materialise despite years of losses. The company's quality grade of "BELOW AVERAGE" reflects long-term financial underperformance, with 5-year EBIT growth of negative 155.20% despite 5-year sales growth of 13.81%. The financial trend is classified as "NEGATIVE" as of September 2025, with key concerns including widening operating losses, rising interest costs, and deteriorating cash flow from operations.

The technical trend turned "BULLISH" on October 7, 2025, providing the only positive signal amongst the four key parameters. However, technical momentum divorced from fundamental improvement typically proves unsustainable. The company's overall Mojo score of 31 out of 100 places it firmly in "SELL" territory, with the proprietary rating system recommending that investors "consider selling" and "look for exit opportunities." This assessment reflects the confluence of negative factors: operational losses, weak returns, cash flow challenges, and absence of institutional confidence.

Key Strengths & Risk Factors

Outlook: What to Watch