Gujarat Industries Power Q3 FY26: Loss-Making Quarter Raises Serious Concerns

Feb 12 2026 08:17 PM IST
share
Share Via
Gujarat Industries Power Company Limited posted a net loss of ₹3.20 crores in Q3 FY26, marking a dramatic reversal from the ₹21.30 crores profit recorded in the previous quarter. The ₹2,194 crore market capitalisation power generation company witnessed its stock plunge 7.2% to ₹141.10 following the results announcement, reflecting investor alarm over the deteriorating financial performance.
Gujarat Industries Power Q3 FY26: Loss-Making Quarter Raises Serious Concerns
Net Profit (Q3 FY26)
-₹3.20 Cr
▼ 115.02% QoQ
Revenue (Q3 FY26)
₹369.94 Cr
▲ 15.10% QoQ
Operating Margin (Excl OI)
33.07%
▼ 46 bps QoQ
Interest Cost (Q3 FY26)
₹36.14 Cr
▲ 98.79% QoQ

The quarter's performance represents a concerning inflection point for Gujarat Industries Power, one of Gujarat's "Panchratnas" (five jewels) in the power sector. Despite revenue growth of 15.10% quarter-on-quarter and 14.89% year-on-year, the company's bottom line collapsed under the weight of surging interest costs and an abnormally high tax rate of 115.09%. The stock has now declined 17.99% over the past year, significantly underperforming the Sensex's 8.52% gain during the same period.

The company operates 810 MW of generation capacity across its Vadodara and Mangrol plants, including combined cycle power plants and a lignite-based facility. However, operational challenges and financial pressures have overshadowed the topline expansion, raising questions about the sustainability of the business model in the current environment.

Financial Performance: A Tale of Two Halves

The December 2025 quarter presented a stark contrast between revenue growth and profitability deterioration. Net sales climbed to ₹369.94 crores, up 15.10% from Q2 FY26's ₹321.40 crores, marking the highest quarterly revenue in recent periods. Year-on-year growth of 14.89% suggests improving demand conditions in Gujarat's power market.

Quarter Revenue (₹ Cr) QoQ Change Net Profit (₹ Cr) QoQ Change Operating Margin
Dec'25 369.94 +15.10% -3.20 -115.02% 33.07%
Sep'25 321.40 -13.49% 21.30 -62.95% 33.53%
Jun'25 371.52 +9.84% 57.47 -17.58% 30.33%
Mar'25 338.25 +5.05% 69.73 +77.88% 35.27%
Dec'24 321.99 +16.64% 39.20 +12.90% 27.78%
Sep'24 276.06 -13.72% 34.72 -48.78% 29.45%
Jun'24 319.96 67.78 36.28%

However, the revenue expansion failed to translate into profitability. Operating profit (PBDIT excluding other income) reached ₹122.33 crores, the highest in recent quarters, yet the operating margin of 33.07% showed marginal compression of 46 basis points quarter-on-quarter. The gross profit margin contracted sharply to 26.70% from 34.38% in Q2 FY26, indicating significant cost pressures.

Employee costs rose to ₹30.67 crores from ₹27.20 crores, whilst depreciation surged to ₹77.57 crores from ₹64.22 crores, reflecting recent capital expenditure coming online. The PAT margin collapsed to negative 0.87% from a positive 6.63% in the preceding quarter, representing one of the weakest profitability performances in the company's recent history.

Revenue Growth (YoY)
+14.89%
Dec'25 vs Dec'24
Net Profit (Q3 FY26)
-₹3.20 Cr
From ₹21.30 Cr in Q2
Operating Margin
33.07%
▼ 46 bps QoQ
PAT Margin
-0.87%
From +6.63% in Q2

The Interest Cost Crisis: A Critical Red Flag

The most alarming development in Q3 FY26 was the dramatic spike in interest costs, which nearly doubled to ₹36.14 crores from ₹18.18 crores in the previous quarter. This represents the highest interest burden in the company's recent quarterly history and signals either increased borrowing or higher interest rates on existing debt.

Critical Alert: Interest Coverage Deteriorates

The operating profit to interest coverage ratio plummeted to just 3.38 times in Q3 FY26, the lowest level recorded. This represents a severe deterioration from the already weak 5.93 times coverage in Q2 FY26. With interest costs consuming a larger share of operating profits, the company's financial flexibility has been significantly constrained.

The profit before tax (excluding other income) fell to just ₹8.62 crores, whilst other income of ₹12.59 crores constituted 59.36% of the total profit before tax. This heavy reliance on non-operating income to support profitability raises concerns about the quality of earnings and the sustainability of the core power generation business.

The abnormal tax rate of 115.09% in Q3 FY26 further compounded the profitability crisis. Tax expense of ₹24.41 crores exceeded the profit before tax of ₹21.21 crores, pushing the company into negative territory. Whilst tax rates can fluctuate due to deferred tax adjustments and one-time items, this level is extraordinary and warrants detailed scrutiny from investors.

Return Ratios Signal Structural Weakness

Beyond the quarterly turbulence, Gujarat Industries Power's return ratios reveal deeper structural challenges. The company's average return on equity (ROE) of 5.98% over recent periods falls well below acceptable thresholds for capital-intensive businesses. This indicates that the company is generating insufficient returns relative to the shareholder capital employed.

The latest ROE of 4.12% represents further deterioration, suggesting that profitability pressures are intensifying rather than improving. For context, quality power generation companies typically deliver ROE in the 12-18% range, making Gujarat Industries Power's performance particularly concerning.

Capital Efficiency Concerns

Return on capital employed (ROCE) averaged 9.82% over recent periods, with the latest reading at just 4.96%. The declining trend in both ROE and ROCE suggests that the company's substantial capital investments in generation capacity are not translating into commensurate profitability. This raises questions about asset utilisation rates, power purchase agreements, and the overall economics of the business model.

The company's sales to capital employed ratio of 0.41 times indicates relatively low asset turnover, typical of capital-intensive power generation but still below optimal levels. Combined with weak return ratios, this suggests the company is struggling to extract adequate value from its 810 MW generation capacity.

Balance Sheet: Modest Leverage but Rising Concerns

Gujarat Industries Power maintains a relatively conservative balance sheet with shareholder funds of ₹2,570.74 crores as of March 2019 and long-term debt of ₹366.58 crores. The debt-to-equity ratio of 0.38 and debt-to-EBITDA of 1.13 times indicate manageable leverage by industry standards.

However, the recent surge in interest costs despite modest reported debt levels suggests either short-term borrowing increases or refinancing at higher rates. The company's fixed assets of ₹2,632.35 crores represent the bulk of its asset base, reflecting the capital-intensive nature of power generation. Current assets of ₹668.31 crores provide reasonable liquidity coverage against current liabilities of ₹437.68 crores.

Cash flow from operations remained healthy at ₹581 crores in FY19, though investors should monitor whether the recent profitability deterioration impacts cash generation in subsequent periods. The company has historically maintained positive operating cash flows, which provides some cushion against short-term earnings volatility.

Industry Context: Power Sector Challenges

Gujarat Industries Power operates in a complex regulatory environment where power purchase agreements, fuel costs, and government policies significantly influence profitability. The company's lignite and gas-based generation capacity exposes it to fuel price volatility, which can compress margins when input costs rise faster than tariff adjustments.

The broader power sector has faced challenges including demand-supply mismatches, payment delays from distribution companies, and competition from renewable energy sources. Gujarat Industries Power's diversified fuel mix including wind and solar provides some hedge against these trends, though the bulk of capacity remains thermal-based.

"The combination of surging interest costs, abnormal tax rates, and deteriorating return ratios suggests Gujarat Industries Power faces both cyclical headwinds and potential structural challenges that require urgent management attention."

Peer Comparison: Lagging Behind Industry Standards

Comparing Gujarat Industries Power to peers in the power generation space reveals significant valuation and performance disparities. The company's ROE of 5.98% trails substantially behind higher-performing peers, whilst its price-to-book ratio of 0.62 times reflects market scepticism about future profitability.

Company P/E Ratio P/BV Ratio ROE % Debt/Equity Div Yield %
Guj Inds. Power 15.07 0.62 5.98 0.38 2.83
RattanIndia Pow. 34.87 1.04 0.38 0.70
Reliance Infra. 0.99 0.25 4.86 0.17
Insolation Ener 21.38 3.91 35.79 0.14 0.08
Ujaas Energy 846.75 29.32 15.23 0.06
K.P. Energy 13.91 5.47 29.01 0.64 0.31

Gujarat Industries Power's P/E ratio of 15.07 times appears reasonable compared to the peer average, though this metric is distorted by the recent loss-making quarter. The company's dividend yield of 2.83% provides some income support, though sustainability of dividends must be questioned given the negative earnings in Q3 FY26.

Notably, peers like Insolation Energy and K.P. Energy demonstrate that strong ROE performance (35.79% and 29.01% respectively) is achievable in the power sector, highlighting Gujarat Industries Power's operational underperformance. The company's lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.38 versus some peers suggests conservative financial management, though this advantage is being eroded by rising interest costs.

Valuation Analysis: Attractive Price, Questionable Quality

At the current market price of ₹141.10, Gujarat Industries Power trades at a price-to-book ratio of just 0.62 times, representing a significant discount to book value of ₹169.96 per share. The stock's valuation grade of "Fair" (recently downgraded from "Attractive") reflects this discount, though investors must question whether the low valuation represents opportunity or value trap.

P/E Ratio (TTM)
15.07x
vs Industry 22x
Price to Book
0.62x
38% discount to book
Dividend Yield
2.83%
₹4 per share
EV/EBITDA
7.65x
Moderate multiple

The EV/EBITDA multiple of 7.65 times appears reasonable for a power generation company, though this metric will likely deteriorate if the Q3 FY26 profitability challenges persist. The stock has declined 37.01% from its 52-week high of ₹224, whilst trading just 5.73% above the 52-week low of ₹133.45, indicating significant downside momentum.

The company's valuation grade history shows multiple oscillations between "Fair" and "Attractive" over the past year, reflecting uncertainty about the appropriate valuation framework. Given the deteriorating financial trends and weak return ratios, the current discount to book value appears justified rather than representing a compelling opportunity.

Shareholding Pattern: Institutional Exodus Continues

The shareholding pattern reveals concerning trends in institutional confidence. Foreign institutional investors (FIIs) reduced their stake to 2.63% in December 2025 from 3.69% in September 2025, marking a sequential decline of 1.06 percentage points. This represents the continuation of a steady divestment trend, with FII holding declining from 4.79% in December 2024.

Investor Category Dec'25 Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 QoQ Change
Promoter 56.57% 56.57% 56.57% 56.57% 0.00%
FII 2.63% 3.69% 4.03% 4.21% -1.06%
Mutual Funds 4.27% 4.27% 4.67% 4.54% 0.00%
Insurance 0.03% 0.14% 0.31% 0.50% -0.11%
Other DII 8.10% 8.19% 8.06% 8.08% -0.09%
Non-Institutional 28.40% 27.15% 26.35% 26.10% +1.25%

Insurance company holdings have collapsed from 0.70% in December 2024 to just 0.03% currently, representing an almost complete exit by this investor category. Mutual fund holdings remained flat at 4.27%, though this follows a decline from 4.81% a year ago. The only positive development is the increase in non-institutional holdings to 28.40%, though this may reflect retail investors catching falling knives rather than informed accumulation.

Promoter holding remains stable at 56.57%, with no pledging of shares—a positive indicator of promoter confidence. The key promoters include Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited (24.73%), Gujarat Alkalies And Chemicals Limited (16.15%), and Gujarat State Fertilizers And Chemicals Limited (15.68%), all government-related entities that provide some stability to the shareholding structure.

Stock Performance: Severe Underperformance Across Timeframes

Gujarat Industries Power's stock performance has been dismal across most timeframes, with particularly severe underperformance over the past year. The stock has declined 17.99% over the past 12 months, whilst the Sensex gained 8.52%, resulting in negative alpha of 26.51 percentage points.

Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Day -7.20% -1.25% -5.95%
1 Week -3.42% -1.14% -2.28%
1 Month -1.74% -1.20% -0.54%
3 Months -17.29% -2.19% -15.10%
6 Months -25.13% +2.59% -27.72%
YTD -9.93% -3.04% -6.89%
1 Year -17.99% +8.52% -26.51%
2 Years -27.12% +15.47% -42.59%
3 Years +76.71% +36.73% +39.98%

The stock's beta of 1.56 indicates high volatility relative to the market, with volatility of 35.38% over the past year placing it firmly in the "high risk, low return" category. The risk-adjusted return of -0.51 and negative Sharpe ratio confirm that investors have been inadequately compensated for the substantial volatility endured.

Technical indicators paint a uniformly bearish picture. The stock trades below all key moving averages—5-day (₹150.43), 20-day (₹142.69), 50-day (₹148.35), 100-day (₹162.99), and 200-day (₹180.20)—indicating persistent selling pressure. The overall technical trend turned "Bearish" on February 13, 2026, with MACD, RSI, and Bollinger Bands all flashing bearish signals.

Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags Overshadow Valuation Discount

Gujarat Industries Power's investment thesis has deteriorated significantly following the Q3 FY26 results. The company scores just 28 out of 100 on proprietary investment metrics, firmly placing it in "Strong Sell" territory. This represents a downgrade from the "Sell" rating just days earlier, reflecting the severity of the quarterly performance.

Valuation Grade
Fair
Attractive pricing
Quality Grade
Average
Below par returns
Financial Trend
Negative
Deteriorating
Technical Trend
Bearish
All indicators red

The company's quality grade of "Average" reflects long-term financial performance that has been mediocre at best. Five-year sales growth of -0.17% and EBIT growth of -2.84% indicate a business in structural decline rather than temporary cyclical weakness. The average ROCE of 9.82% and ROE of 5.98% fall well short of acceptable hurdle rates for capital-intensive businesses.

Whilst the valuation appears attractive with a P/BV of 0.62 times and reasonable P/E of 15.07 times, these metrics may prove to be value traps rather than opportunities. The negative financial trend and bearish technical setup suggest further downside risks before any stabilisation occurs.

Key Strengths & Risk Factors

KEY STRENGTHS

  • Stable Promoter Base: 56.57% holding by government-related entities with zero pledging provides governance comfort
  • Conservative Leverage: Debt-to-equity of 0.38 and debt-to-EBITDA of 1.13 indicate manageable debt levels
  • Revenue Growth: Q3 FY26 revenue up 14.89% YoY demonstrates improving demand conditions
  • Dividend Yield: 2.83% yield provides some income support, though sustainability is questionable
  • Diversified Fuel Mix: Combination of gas, lignite, wind, and solar provides some operational flexibility
  • Valuation Discount: Trading at 0.62x book value represents significant discount to stated net worth

KEY CONCERNS

  • Loss-Making Quarter: Net loss of ₹3.20 crores in Q3 FY26 represents severe profitability deterioration
  • Interest Cost Explosion: Interest doubled to ₹36.14 crores, crushing profitability despite revenue growth
  • Abnormal Tax Rate: 115.09% tax rate in Q3 FY26 raises questions about tax provisioning and earnings quality
  • Weak Return Ratios: ROE of 4.12% and ROCE of 4.96% indicate poor capital efficiency
  • Institutional Exodus: FII, mutual fund, and insurance holdings declining consistently over past year
  • Negative Long-Term Growth: Five-year sales and EBIT growth both negative, indicating structural decline
  • Technical Breakdown: Stock in bearish trend, trading below all moving averages with negative momentum

Outlook: What to Watch

POSITIVE CATALYSTS

  • Normalisation of interest costs in Q4 FY26 if recent spike was temporary
  • Improvement in capacity utilisation rates driving better asset productivity
  • Favourable power purchase agreement renewals at improved tariffs
  • Management commentary clarifying tax rate anomaly and future outlook
  • Stabilisation of fuel costs improving gross margins

RED FLAGS TO MONITOR

  • Continued high interest costs in Q4 FY26 suggesting permanent increase in debt servicing
  • Further deterioration in return ratios below current weak levels
  • Additional institutional selling pressure accelerating stock decline
  • Inability to return to profitability in upcoming quarters
  • Dividend cut or suspension due to earnings pressure
  • Working capital deterioration impacting cash flows

The Verdict: Exit Recommended

STRONG SELL

Score: 28/100

For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions. The combination of a loss-making quarter, surging interest costs, weak return ratios, and negative long-term growth trends suggests this is a value trap rather than an opportunity. The 38% discount to book value is insufficient compensation for the fundamental deterioration and operational challenges facing the business.

For Existing Holders: Consider exiting positions on any relief rallies. The Q3 FY26 results represent a significant deterioration beyond normal cyclical weakness, with the interest cost explosion and abnormal tax rate raising serious questions about earnings sustainability. Institutional investors are voting with their feet, and the bearish technical setup suggests further downside ahead. The 2.83% dividend yield is unlikely to be maintained if profitability remains under pressure.

Fair Value Estimate: ₹120-125 (12-15% downside risk from current levels). The stock may find support near the 52-week low of ₹133.45, but further deterioration in fundamentals could drive prices lower towards the ₹110-120 range before stabilisation occurs.

Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)

⚠️ Investment Disclaimer

This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The views expressed are those of the author and do not constitute recommendations to buy or sell securities.

{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News