Hittco Tools Q4 FY26: Micro-Cap Manufacturer Returns to Profit After Three Consecutive Loss-Making Quarters

Jun 01 2026 03:38 PM IST
share
Share Via
Hittco Tools Ltd., a Bangalore-based micro-cap manufacturer of carbide and high-speed steel cutting tools, reported a return to profitability in Q4 FY26 (Mar'26) with net profit of ₹0.12 crores, marking a dramatic turnaround from three consecutive quarters of losses. The stock surged 9.53% to ₹10.69 on June 01, 2026, though it remains down 15.83% over the past year and continues to trade 33.19% below its 52-week high of ₹16.00.
Hittco Tools Q4 FY26: Micro-Cap Manufacturer Returns to Profit After Three Consecutive Loss-Making Quarters

With a diminutive market capitalisation of just ₹6.00 crores and promoter holding at 28.37%, the company's quarterly performance showed revenue of ₹2.47 crores (up 29.32% quarter-on-quarter but down 5.73% year-on-year), whilst operating margins recovered sharply to 21.86% from negative territory in the previous three quarters. However, the company's proprietary investment score of just 12 out of 100 and a "STRONG SELL" rating underscore significant concerns about sustainability and financial health.

Net Profit (Q4 FY26)
₹0.12 Cr
vs Loss of ₹0.26 Cr (Q3)
Revenue (Q4 FY26)
₹2.47 Cr
+29.32% QoQ
Operating Margin
21.86%
vs -12.04% (Q3)
Average ROE
10.62%
5-Year Average

The March 2026 quarter represents a critical inflection point for Hittco Tools after a bruising period that saw the company report losses of ₹0.29 crores, ₹0.25 crores, and ₹0.26 crores in the June, September, and December 2025 quarters respectively. The recovery, whilst welcome, comes against a backdrop of persistent operational challenges, elevated debt levels, and a bearish technical trend that has seen the stock underperform both its industrial manufacturing sector peers and the broader Sensex benchmark.

Financial Performance: Dramatic Margin Recovery Drives Profitability

Hittco Tools' Q4 FY26 financial performance was characterised by a sharp sequential improvement across multiple metrics. Net sales of ₹2.47 crores represented a robust 29.32% quarter-on-quarter increase from ₹1.91 crores in Q3 FY26, though the year-on-year comparison revealed a 5.73% decline from ₹2.62 crores in Q4 FY25. This mixed picture—strong sequential momentum but weaker annual comparisons—encapsulates the company's uneven trajectory.

The most striking development was the dramatic recovery in operating profitability. Operating profit before depreciation, interest, tax, and other income (PBDIT excl OI) surged to ₹0.54 crores in Q4 FY26, yielding an operating margin of 21.86%—the highest in the trailing eight quarters and a remarkable turnaround from the negative 12.04% margin recorded just one quarter earlier. This margin expansion was driven by improved revenue realisation and better cost absorption, with employee costs of ₹0.60 crores representing 24.29% of sales, down from 28.80% in Q3 FY26.

Revenue (Q4 FY26)
₹2.47 Cr
+29.32% QoQ | -5.73% YoY
Net Profit (Q4 FY26)
₹0.12 Cr
vs Loss in Q1-Q3 FY26
Operating Margin
21.86%
vs -12.04% (Q3 FY26)
PAT Margin
4.86%
vs -13.61% (Q3 FY26)

Profit before tax reached ₹0.20 crores in Q4 FY26 compared to a loss of ₹0.26 crores in the previous quarter, with the company recording a tax charge of ₹0.08 crores (40.00% tax rate). Net profit of ₹0.12 crores translated to a PAT margin of 4.86%, a significant improvement from the negative margins that plagued the first three quarters of FY26. However, this profitability remains fragile—the company reported a full-year FY25 net profit of zero in rounded terms, indicating persistent challenges in maintaining consistent earnings.

Quarter Net Sales (₹ Cr) QoQ Growth Net Profit (₹ Cr) Operating Margin PAT Margin
Mar'26 2.47 +29.32% 0.12 21.86% 4.86%
Dec'25 1.91 -6.37% -0.26 -12.04% -13.61%
Sep'25 2.04 +22.16% -0.25 -1.96% -12.25%
Jun'25 1.67 -36.26% -0.29 -6.59% -17.37%
Mar'25 2.62 +69.03% 0.48 10.69% 18.32%
Dec'24 1.55 +12.32% -0.16 0.0% -10.32%
Sep'24 1.38 -0.29 -6.52% -21.01%

The quality of earnings in Q4 FY26 warrants scrutiny. Other income contributed a minimal ₹0.01 crores, suggesting the profitability was genuinely operational rather than treasury-driven. Interest costs of ₹0.05 crores and depreciation of ₹0.30 crores consumed significant portions of operating profit, highlighting the burden of the company's debt-laden balance sheet and capital-intensive manufacturing operations. The gross profit margin of 20.24% in Q4 FY26, whilst improved from negative territory in Q3, remains well below the 28.63% achieved in Q4 FY25, pointing to ongoing pricing or cost pressures.

Operational Challenges: Weak Returns and High Leverage Cloud the Recovery

Beneath the surface-level improvement in quarterly profitability lie deeper structural concerns about Hittco Tools' operational efficiency and capital structure. The company's average return on equity (ROE) of 10.62% over the past five years, whilst higher than several micro-cap peers, masks significant volatility and recent deterioration. The latest ROE stands at negative 12.21%, reflecting the loss-making performance across much of FY26. Similarly, the average return on capital employed (ROCE) of negative 1.25% and latest ROCE of negative 9.74% indicate the company is destroying rather than creating value with its invested capital.

Critical Operational Red Flags

Weak Capital Efficiency: Latest ROCE of -9.74% and ROE of -12.21% signal fundamental value destruction. The company's five-year EBIT CAGR of -10.63% confirms a persistent inability to generate sustainable operating profits, with average EBIT-to-interest coverage of just 0.21x indicating earnings are insufficient to service debt obligations.

High Leverage Burden: With average net debt-to-equity of 1.51x and debt-to-EBITDA of 3.19x, the company operates under significant financial strain. Long-term debt increased to ₹4.64 crores in FY25 from ₹2.92 crores in FY24, whilst shareholder funds have stagnated at ₹3.41 crores, limiting financial flexibility.

The balance sheet as of March 2025 reveals a company stretched thin by debt and working capital pressures. Fixed assets of ₹3.93 crores have increased from ₹2.91 crores a year earlier, suggesting ongoing capital expenditure, yet this investment has not translated into improved profitability or returns. Current assets of ₹4.68 crores against current liabilities of ₹1.68 crores provide a current ratio of approximately 2.79x, offering some liquidity cushion, though trade payables have surged to ₹1.29 crores from just ₹0.26 crores year-on-year, potentially indicating stretched supplier relationships.

The company's sales-to-capital-employed ratio of 0.93x suggests inefficient asset utilisation—each rupee of capital employed generates less than one rupee of revenue. This, combined with the negative ROCE, points to either excess capacity, poor pricing power, or operational inefficiencies that prevent the business from achieving adequate scale economics. For a manufacturing business in the competitive cutting tools industry, these metrics are particularly concerning as they suggest limited competitive advantages or differentiation.

Industry Context: Struggling in a Recovering Manufacturing Environment

Hittco Tools operates in the industrial manufacturing sector, specifically producing carbide and high-speed steel (HSS) cutting tools for machining metals and acrylics. The company's two manufacturing units in Bangalore's Peenya Industrial Area position it within India's largest industrial zone, yet this geographic advantage has not translated into consistent financial performance. Over the past year, Hittco Tools has underperformed its sector significantly, with a 15.83% decline compared to the industrial manufacturing sector's 1.90% decline, resulting in 13.93 percentage points of underperformance.

The broader industrial manufacturing sector has faced headwinds from volatile raw material costs, competitive pressures from imports, and cyclical demand patterns tied to capital expenditure cycles in end-user industries such as automotive, aerospace, and general engineering. Whilst larger, well-capitalised players have managed to navigate these challenges through scale advantages, product diversification, and technological investments, micro-cap manufacturers like Hittco Tools have struggled with limited pricing power and higher per-unit costs.

Competitive Positioning: Scale Disadvantages Evident

With annual revenues of approximately ₹6.00 crores in FY25 and a market capitalisation of just ₹6.00 crores, Hittco Tools operates at a significant scale disadvantage relative to larger peers in the cutting tools and industrial components space. The company's inability to achieve consistent profitability despite a 10.73% five-year sales CAGR suggests structural issues with cost structure, pricing, or operational efficiency that size alone cannot overcome.

The company's five-year sales growth of 10.73% CAGR appears respectable on the surface, yet this has been accompanied by a negative 10.63% CAGR in EBIT, indicating that revenue growth has come at the expense of profitability—a classic symptom of either aggressive pricing to win business or inability to control costs as volumes expand. This divergence between top-line and bottom-line growth trajectories is a significant red flag for investors seeking sustainable, profitable growth.

Peer Comparison: Valuation Premium Unjustified by Fundamentals

Comparing Hittco Tools to its micro-cap industrial manufacturing peers reveals a valuation that appears disconnected from underlying fundamentals. With a price-to-book value ratio of 2.46x, the company trades at a substantial premium to peers such as Shivagrico Implements (1.47x) and Rajasthan Cylinders (0.76x), despite comparable or inferior profitability metrics. The company's average ROE of 10.62% is higher than Shivagrico's 4.29% and Rajasthan Cylinders' 8.26%, providing some justification for the premium, yet the recent deterioration to negative ROE undermines this argument.

Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE (Avg) Debt/Equity Div Yield
Hittco Tools NA (Loss Making) 2.46x 10.62% 1.51x NA
Shivagrico Impl. 24.55x 1.47x 4.29% 1.97x NA
Rajasthan Cylind NA (Loss Making) 0.76x 8.26% -0.02x NA
Pan Electronics NA (Loss Making) -0.38x 0.0% -1.35x NA
Premier NA (Loss Making) -0.03x 0.0% -0.46x NA
Lexoraa Ind 247.66x -7.43x 0.0% 0.15x NA

The peer comparison reveals a landscape of financially stressed micro-cap manufacturers, with multiple companies reporting losses (hence the "NA" P/E ratios) and several trading below book value. Hittco Tools' debt-to-equity ratio of 1.51x, whilst concerning, is actually lower than Shivagrico's 1.97x, though both levels indicate significant leverage risk. The absence of dividend yields across the peer group reflects the capital constraints and profitability challenges endemic to this segment of the market.

Notably, Hittco Tools ranks sixth among its peer group by market capitalisation at ₹6.00 crores, underscoring its position as a genuine micro-cap with limited liquidity and institutional interest. The average daily trading volume of just 398 shares (as of the latest data) further highlights the illiquidity risk, making it difficult for investors to enter or exit positions without significant price impact.

Valuation Analysis: Risky Grade Reflects Fundamental Concerns

Hittco Tools carries a "RISKY" valuation grade, a classification that accurately reflects the company's precarious financial position. With a P/E ratio of "NA (Loss Making)" due to trailing twelve-month losses, traditional earnings-based valuation metrics are not applicable. The price-to-book ratio of 2.46x might appear moderate in isolation, yet when considered alongside the negative ROE and ROCE, it suggests investors are paying a premium for assets that are actively destroying value.

The company's enterprise value-to-EBITDA ratio of -10.40x and EV-to-EBIT of -10.40x (negative due to negative earnings) further underscore the valuation challenges. These negative multiples indicate that the company's enterprise value (market cap plus net debt) cannot be meaningfully assessed against its operating earnings, as those earnings are negative. The EV-to-sales ratio of 1.26x provides a revenue-based valuation anchor, yet this metric ignores profitability entirely and offers limited insight for a company with such volatile margins.

P/E Ratio (TTM)
NA
(Loss Making)
Price to Book
2.46x
vs Sector Avg ~1.1x
EV/Sales
1.26x
Revenue-based valuation
Mojo Score
12/100
STRONG SELL

The valuation grade history reveals a company whose investment appeal has deteriorated significantly over time. After briefly achieving an "Attractive" grade in May 2023, the valuation assessment has cycled through "Very Expensive" and "Expensive" before settling on "Risky" since November 2024. This progression mirrors the fundamental deterioration in operating performance and the market's growing recognition of the sustainability challenges facing the business.

At the current price of ₹10.69, the stock trades 33.19% below its 52-week high of ₹16.00 but 27.11% above its 52-week low of ₹8.41, positioning it in the lower-middle portion of its trading range. This suggests the market has already priced in significant downside risk, yet the weak fundamentals and negative momentum indicators provide little confidence that the current price represents a compelling entry point. The absence of any fair value estimate or target price in the proprietary analysis reflects the difficulty in modelling a sustainable earnings trajectory for the company.

Shareholding Pattern: Modest Promoter Increase Provides Limited Comfort

The shareholding pattern for Hittco Tools reveals a promoter-driven company with minimal institutional participation. As of May 2026, promoter holding stood at 28.37%, unchanged from March 2026 but representing a 2.74 percentage point increase from the 25.63% level maintained in the September, December 2025, and June 2025 quarters. This sequential increase in Q4 FY26 demonstrates some promoter confidence, though the absolute level of holding remains relatively modest for a micro-cap company, where promoters typically maintain 50-70% stakes.

Quarter Promoter QoQ Change FII Mutual Funds Insurance Non-Institutional
May'26 28.37% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 71.63%
Mar'26 28.37% +2.74% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 71.63%
Dec'25 25.63% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 74.37%
Sep'25 25.63% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 74.37%
Jun'25 25.63% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 74.37%

The complete absence of foreign institutional investors (FIIs), mutual funds, insurance companies, and other domestic institutional investors (DIIs) speaks volumes about the company's investment profile. With zero institutional holdings across all categories, Hittco Tools lacks the validation and liquidity support that institutional participation typically provides. The non-institutional holding of 71.63% (which decreased to match the promoter increase in Q4 FY26) comprises primarily retail investors and other non-institutional entities, a shareholder base that tends to be more volatile and price-sensitive.

Key promoters include Surendra Bhandari (15.15%), Yash Vardhan Bhandari (6.26%), and Hittco Realty LLP (5.60%), with smaller stakes held by Madhu Bhandari (1.06%) and Sidharth Bhandari (0.29%). The family-centric promoter group structure is typical for small-scale manufacturing enterprises, though the relatively low aggregate holding raises questions about promoter conviction or potential capital constraints that limit their ability to increase stakes further. Positively, there is no promoter pledging, eliminating one potential risk factor.

Stock Performance: Persistent Underperformance Across Timeframes

Hittco Tools' stock performance has been characterised by persistent underperformance relative to both the Sensex benchmark and its sector peers across most meaningful timeframes. Over the past year, the stock has declined 15.83% compared to the Sensex's 8.82% fall, resulting in negative alpha of 7.01 percentage points. This underperformance extends to the two-year horizon (stock down 8.63% vs Sensex up 0.41%, alpha of -9.04%) and three-year period (stock down 9.56% vs Sensex up 18.96%, alpha of -28.52 percentage points).

Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha Interpretation
1 Day +9.53% -0.68% +10.21% Strong bounce
1 Week +6.90% -2.90% +9.80% Short-term momentum
1 Month -2.82% -3.44% +0.62% Slight outperformance
3 Month -7.37% -8.64% +1.27% Marginal outperformance
6 Month -23.64% -13.28% -10.36% Significant underperformance
YTD -13.37% -12.85% -0.52% In line with market
1 Year -15.83% -8.82% -7.01% Underperformance
2 Years -8.63% +0.41% -9.04% Weak relative performance
3 Years -9.56% +18.96% -28.52% Severe underperformance
5 Years +182.80% +43.00% +139.80% Strong long-term gains

The only bright spot in the performance analysis comes from the five-year horizon, where the stock has delivered a remarkable 182.80% return compared to the Sensex's 43.00%, generating positive alpha of 139.80 percentage points. However, this long-term outperformance is largely attributable to the stock's extremely depressed base in 2021 rather than sustained operational excellence, and the recent deterioration suggests this historical outperformance is unlikely to continue.

From a technical perspective, the stock currently trades in a confirmed bearish trend, having shifted to this status on May 07, 2026, at ₹10.99. The stock trades below all key moving averages—5-day (₹9.95), 20-day (₹10.51), 50-day (₹10.77), 100-day (₹11.38), and 200-day (₹12.63)—a classic sign of technical weakness. Both weekly and monthly MACD indicators flash bearish signals, whilst Bollinger Bands suggest continued downward pressure. The only mildly positive technical indicator is the weekly KST (Know Sure Thing), which shows a mildly bullish reading, though this is insufficient to overcome the broader bearish configuration.

The stock's beta of 1.50 indicates it is significantly more volatile than the broader market, amplifying both gains and losses. With annualised volatility of 76.71% over the past year, Hittco Tools exhibits extreme price swings that make it unsuitable for risk-averse investors. The risk-adjusted return of -0.21 (compared to the Sensex's -0.68) places it in the "HIGH RISK LOW RETURN" category—arguably the worst possible combination for investors.

Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags Overwhelm Single-Quarter Recovery

The investment thesis for Hittco Tools is severely compromised by a confluence of negative factors that far outweigh the single quarter of profitability in Q4 FY26. The company's proprietary Mojo Score of just 12 out of 100, placing it firmly in "STRONG SELL" territory, reflects a comprehensive assessment across four key dimensions: valuation (graded "RISKY"), quality (graded "BELOW AVERAGE"), financial trend (currently "FLAT"), and technical trend ("BEARISH").

Valuation Grade
RISKY
Negative earnings, high P/BV
Quality Grade
BELOW AVERAGE
Weak ROCE/ROE, high debt
Financial Trend
FLAT
Single quarter recovery
Technical Trend
BEARISH
Below all key MAs

The quality assessment reveals a company with "below average" fundamentals, characterised by negative five-year EBIT growth (-10.63% CAGR), weak interest coverage (0.21x), elevated leverage (debt-to-EBITDA of 3.19x, net debt-to-equity of 1.51x), and deteriorating returns on capital. Whilst the company benefits from no promoter pledging and a 10.73% sales CAGR over five years, these positives are insufficient to offset the fundamental operational weaknesses.

The financial trend classification of "FLAT" acknowledges the Q4 FY26 improvement but appropriately refuses to characterise this as a positive trend given the preceding three quarters of losses. Key positive factors cited include the highest quarterly PBDIT of ₹0.54 crores and highest PBT (excluding other income) of ₹0.19 crores, yet these represent recovery to barely positive levels rather than robust profitability. The trend history shows the company has oscillated between "FLAT," "POSITIVE," and "NEGATIVE" classifications since 2019, indicating persistent instability.

"A single quarter of marginal profitability cannot obscure years of value destruction, negative returns on capital, and an unsustainable debt burden that threatens the company's long-term viability."

Key Strengths & Risk Factors

✓ Key Strengths

  • Return to Profitability: Q4 FY26 net profit of ₹0.12 crores after three consecutive loss-making quarters demonstrates potential for recovery.
  • Margin Recovery: Operating margin of 21.86% in Q4 FY26 represents significant improvement from negative margins in prior quarters.
  • Sequential Revenue Growth: 29.32% QoQ revenue increase in Q4 FY26 shows improving demand or pricing power.
  • No Promoter Pledging: Zero pledged shares eliminates one category of financial risk.
  • Long-term Revenue Growth: Five-year sales CAGR of 10.73% demonstrates some underlying business momentum.
  • Strategic Location: Manufacturing facilities in Peenya Industrial Area provide access to India's largest industrial ecosystem.
  • Recent Promoter Increase: 2.74 percentage point increase in promoter holding in Q4 FY26 signals some insider confidence.

⚠ Key Concerns

  • Value Destruction: Negative ROCE (-9.74%) and ROE (-12.21%) indicate capital is being destroyed rather than created.
  • High Leverage: Debt-to-equity of 1.51x and rising debt levels (₹4.64 crores in FY25 vs ₹2.92 crores in FY24) strain financial flexibility.
  • Weak Interest Coverage: EBIT-to-interest ratio of just 0.21x means earnings cannot adequately service debt obligations.
  • Persistent Losses: Three consecutive loss-making quarters in FY26 before Q4 recovery raises sustainability concerns.
  • YoY Revenue Decline: Q4 FY26 sales down 5.73% year-on-year despite QoQ improvement.
  • Zero Institutional Interest: Complete absence of FII, mutual fund, and insurance holdings signals lack of professional investor confidence.
  • Extreme Illiquidity: Tiny market cap (₹6.00 crores) and minimal trading volumes (398 shares) create significant exit risk.
  • Technical Weakness: Bearish trend with stock trading below all key moving averages and negative momentum indicators.
  • High Volatility: Beta of 1.50 and annualised volatility of 76.71% create extreme price risk.

Outlook: What to Watch

Positive Catalysts

  • Sustained Profitability: Two to three consecutive quarters of positive earnings would validate the Q4 FY26 recovery as genuine rather than aberrational.
  • Margin Stabilisation: Operating margins consistently above 15-20% would demonstrate improved cost control and pricing power.
  • Debt Reduction: Meaningful deleveraging to bring debt-to-equity below 1.0x would alleviate financial stress.
  • Institutional Entry: Any mutual fund or insurance company taking even a small stake would signal improved investment credibility.
  • Capacity Utilisation: Improved sales-to-capital-employed ratio indicating better asset utilisation and operational efficiency.

Red Flags to Monitor

  • Return to Losses: Any reversion to loss-making in upcoming quarters would confirm Q4 FY26 was a one-off rather than sustainable turnaround.
  • Further Debt Increase: Additional borrowing without corresponding improvement in EBITDA would worsen already strained debt metrics.
  • Promoter Selling: Any reduction in the modest 28.37% promoter holding would signal insider pessimism.
  • Working Capital Deterioration: Further increase in trade payables or decrease in current ratio could indicate liquidity stress.
  • Technical Breakdown: Breach of 52-week low (₹8.41) would likely trigger additional selling pressure and mark a new leg down.
  • Revenue Volatility: Continued wild swings in quarterly revenue would underscore lack of business stability and predictability.

Looking ahead, investors should closely monitor whether Hittco Tools can sustain positive earnings beyond a single quarter. The company's ability to maintain operating margins above 15% whilst growing revenues on a year-on-year basis will be the critical test of whether Q4 FY26 represents a genuine inflection point or merely a temporary reprieve. Equally important will be the company's success in reducing its debt burden and improving returns on capital—without these fundamental improvements, any stock price recovery is likely to prove short-lived.

The Verdict: Avoid This High-Risk Micro-Cap

STRONG SELL

Score: 12/100

For Fresh Investors: Avoid entirely. The combination of negative returns on capital, high leverage, persistent losses, extreme volatility, and zero institutional interest creates an unacceptable risk-reward profile. A single quarter of marginal profitability is insufficient evidence of sustainable turnaround given the company's multi-year track record of value destruction.

For Existing Holders: Consider exiting on any technical bounce towards ₹11-12 levels to minimise losses. The current 9.53% single-day gain provides a potential exit window. With the stock rated "STRONG SELL" and scoring just 12 out of 100, the probability of further downside significantly exceeds upside potential.

Fair Value Estimate: Not calculable given negative earnings and unsustainable fundamentals. Current price of ₹10.69 appears to already incorporate significant downside risk, yet limited visibility on sustainable profitability prevents establishing a credible fair value target. Risk of further 20-30% downside if company returns to loss-making in coming quarters.

Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)

⚠️ Investment Disclaimer

This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Micro-cap stocks like Hittco Tools carry substantial risks including extreme volatility, illiquidity, and potential for total capital loss.

{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News