IIFL Finance Q3 FY26: Strong Turnaround Marred by Regulatory Overhang

The quarter-on-quarter momentum remained robust, with net profit advancing 23.38% from ₹376.33 crores in Q2 FY26, driven by strong interest income growth, margin expansion, and controlled credit costs. Yet, the stock's sharp decline underscores the delicate balance between operational excellence and market sentiment in the NBFC sector, where regulatory developments can swiftly override fundamental performance.

The quarter's standout feature was the dramatic recovery from the previous year's regulatory-induced setback. In Q3 FY25, IIFL Finance had posted a meagre ₹40.70 crores in consolidated profit, weighed down by elevated provisioning and operational disruptions. The year-ago comparison, whilst optically spectacular, reflects recovery from an abnormally weak base rather than structural outperformance. More instructive is the sequential improvement, which demonstrates genuine operational momentum across the lending portfolio.

Financial Performance: Margin Expansion Drives Profitability Surge

IIFL Finance's Q3 FY26 results showcase a business firing on multiple cylinders. Interest income—the lifeblood of any NBFC—climbed to ₹3,427.45 crores, marking a 3.70% quarter-on-quarter increase and a robust 40.32% year-on-year expansion. This growth reflects both portfolio expansion and favourable yield dynamics, as the company navigated the competitive lending landscape whilst maintaining pricing discipline.

The standout metric was the operating margin (excluding other income), which surged to 62.65% from 59.96% in Q2 FY26—a 269 basis point sequential improvement. Year-on-year, the margin expansion was even more dramatic at 1,614 basis points, climbing from a depressed 46.51% in Q3 FY25. This margin recovery stems from controlled interest costs, operational efficiencies, and the normalisation of credit provisioning after the previous year's elevated levels.

Interest expenses rose to ₹1,437.01 crores in Q3 FY26, up 3.99% sequentially, but grew at a slower pace than interest income, indicating improving net interest margins. Employee costs increased to ₹565.35 crores, reflecting headcount additions and wage inflation, yet remained well-contained relative to revenue growth. The company's ability to leverage its operating base whilst expanding the loan book demonstrates operational maturity.

Profit before tax surged to ₹662.94 crores from ₹556.69 crores in Q2 FY26, a 19.09% sequential jump. The tax rate remained stable at 24.37%, resulting in standalone net profit of ₹501.35 crores. The consolidated profit of ₹464.30 crores—accounting for subsidiary performance—represents the headline figure and underscores the group's return to consistent profitability after the tumultuous previous year.

Profitability Metrics: Return Ratios Remain Subdued Despite Earnings Recovery

Whilst quarterly earnings have rebounded sharply, IIFL Finance's return ratios tell a more nuanced story. The company's average return on equity (ROE) over the past five years stands at 14.17%, a respectable but not exceptional figure in the NBFC universe. More concerning is the latest ROE of just 6.62%, reflecting the lingering impact of FY25's regulatory challenges and elevated capital base relative to trailing twelve-month earnings.

The return on capital employed (ROCE) of 9.29% similarly lags the company's historical performance and peer benchmarks. These muted return metrics highlight a critical challenge: despite strong quarterly profit growth, the company must sustain this momentum over multiple quarters to meaningfully improve annualised returns and justify its valuation multiples. The path to ROE normalisation above 15% requires consistent earnings growth without proportionate capital infusions—a test of both operational execution and capital allocation discipline.

Balance Sheet Dynamics: High Leverage Remains a Structural Feature

IIFL Finance operates with a debt-to-equity ratio of 4.53 times, a figure that reflects the inherent leverage in NBFC business models but nonetheless warrants careful monitoring. The company's shareholder funds stood at ₹12,412.19 crores as of March 2025, up from ₹10,636.99 crores a year earlier, indicating steady capital accretion through retained earnings. Current liabilities of ₹55,589.46 crores—primarily borrowings to fund the loan book—underscore the scale of operations but also the reliance on wholesale funding markets.

The investment portfolio grew to ₹5,308.75 crores from ₹4,354.88 crores year-on-year, suggesting strategic deployment of surplus funds in liquid securities. Fixed assets remain modest at ₹170.25 crores, reflecting the asset-light nature of the lending business. The balance sheet structure is typical of a growing NBFC, but the elevated leverage magnifies both upside potential and downside risk, particularly in scenarios of funding market stress or asset quality deterioration.

Peer Comparison: Valuation Premium Despite Moderate Returns

IIFL Finance's positioning within the NBFC peer group reveals a mixed picture. The company trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of 30.87 times trailing twelve-month earnings, significantly below the sector average of approximately 47 times but above several quality peers. For context, Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company trades at just 13.92 times, whilst Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services commands 19.66 times—both with lower leverage and more established franchises.

On price-to-book value, IIFL Finance trades at 2.04 times, modestly below the peer average of approximately 2.40 times. This relative discount reflects market scepticism about return sustainability and regulatory risks. However, the company's ROE of 14.17% (five-year average) compares favourably to peers like Poonawalla Fincorp (4.86%) and Tata Investment Corporation (1.15%), though it trails Authum Investment & Infrastructure (28.18%).

The peer comparison suggests IIFL Finance occupies a middle ground—neither the cheapest nor the most expensive in its cohort. The valuation premium to Cholamandalam and M&M Financial appears justified by superior ROE, but the discount to book value relative to Poonawalla and Authum reflects market concerns about earnings sustainability and regulatory headwinds. Investors are essentially pricing in a "show-me" story, demanding proof of consistent profitability before awarding a re-rating.

Valuation Analysis: Expensive Despite Recent Correction

At the current price of ₹540.80, IIFL Finance trades at a significant premium to its book value of ₹153.28 per share, implying a price-to-book multiple of 2.04 times. The stock's valuation grade remains "Expensive" despite multiple downgrades from "Very Expensive" in recent months, suggesting limited margin of safety at prevailing levels. The company's proprietary valuation assessment has oscillated between "Fair" and "Very Expensive" over the past year, reflecting volatile earnings and shifting market sentiment.

The enterprise value-to-EBITDA multiple of 12.57 times and EV-to-sales ratio of 7.05 times both suggest premium pricing relative to historical norms and peer averages. With a PEG ratio unavailable due to earnings volatility, traditional growth-at-a-reasonable-price frameworks offer limited guidance. The absence of dividend yield (last dividend of ₹4 per share in January 2024) removes income as a valuation support, leaving capital appreciation as the sole return driver.

The stock's 52-week range of ₹280.95 to ₹674.95 illustrates the extreme volatility that has characterised the counter. Currently trading 19.88% below the 52-week high and 92.49% above the low, the stock sits in a precarious middle zone—neither a screaming bargain nor an obvious sell. Fair value estimates based on normalised earnings and peer multiples suggest a range of ₹480-550 per share, implying limited upside from current levels absent a fundamental re-rating catalyst.

Shareholding Pattern: Institutional Confidence Building Gradually

The shareholding pattern reveals cautious optimism amongst institutional investors, though promoter holding remains relatively modest for an Indian NBFC. Promoter stake has declined marginally from 24.90% in December 2024 to 24.85% in December 2025, primarily due to equity dilution rather than outright selling. This stable-to-declining promoter holding is not uncommon in professionally-managed NBFCs but does remove a potential source of buying support.

Foreign institutional investors (FIIs) have increased their stake from 27.79% to 27.76% over the past year, with a notable uptick in the latest quarter (up 100 basis points to 27.76% from 26.76% in September 2025). This sequential increase suggests renewed FII interest following the earnings recovery, though the overall holding remains below the 30% threshold that would signal strong conviction.

Mutual fund participation has surged from just 2.13% in December 2024 to 6.57% in December 2025, a 444 basis point increase that represents the most significant positive development in the shareholding structure. This sharp rise indicates domestic institutional managers are accumulating the stock, likely viewing the current valuation as attractive relative to growth prospects. However, the latest quarter saw a 37 basis point decline to 6.57% from 6.94%, suggesting some profit-booking after the rally.

The combined institutional holding (FII + MF + Insurance + Other DII) stands at 36.93%, up from approximately 32% a year ago. This rising institutional participation provides a floor to the stock during corrections but also means future buying support may be limited unless fundamentals improve dramatically. The absence of promoter pledging is a positive, eliminating one potential overhang that plagues many mid-cap financials.

Stock Performance: Volatility Defines the Journey

IIFL Finance's stock performance over the past year epitomises the boom-bust cycle that characterises leveraged financial stocks. The one-year return of 40.32% significantly outpaces the Sensex gain of 7.73%, delivering alpha of 32.59 percentage points. However, this outperformance masks extreme volatility, with the stock plunging 13.15% in a single session following the Q3 results despite strong earnings—a testament to the market's focus on regulatory risks and valuation concerns.

Over shorter timeframes, the picture darkens considerably. The stock has declined 14.83% over the past week and 5.20% over the past month, underperforming the Sensex by 13.54 and 1.39 percentage points respectively. Year-to-date, IIFL Finance has surrendered 11.42% whilst the Sensex is down just 3.42%, resulting in negative alpha of 8.00 percentage points. This recent underperformance reflects profit-booking after the stock's rally from October 2025 lows and growing concerns about sustainability of the earnings recovery.

The three-month return of 8.22% (alpha of +10.73%) represents the sweet spot where fundamental improvement translated into stock gains. However, the two-year and three-year returns of -13.25% and 13.16% respectively—both underperforming the Sensex—highlight the challenges the company faced during the regulatory crackdown period. The five-year return of 373.90% (alpha of +305.51%) showcases the stock's multi-bagger potential during favourable cycles, but also underscores the importance of entry timing.

The stock's beta of 1.35 confirms its high-volatility nature, moving 35% more than the broader market. Risk-adjusted returns over one year stand at 1.05, indicating positive performance relative to volatility, but the 38.56% annualised volatility places the stock firmly in the "high risk, high return" category. For context, the Sensex's volatility of just 11.25% underscores how much more turbulent the IIFL Finance journey has been.

Investment Thesis: Quality Improving But Valuation Offers Limited Cushion

IIFL Finance's investment case rests on three pillars: improving fundamental quality, positive near-term momentum, and reasonable—though not cheap—valuation. The company's quality grade has improved from "Average" to "Good" over the past two years, reflecting sustained sales growth of 16.87% annually and EBIT expansion of 14.57% over five years. Institutional holdings of 36.93% provide validation of the improving franchise, whilst the absence of promoter pledging eliminates a key risk factor.

The near-term drivers appear constructive. Quarterly financial trends have turned positive, with Q3 FY26 marking the third consecutive quarter of sequential profit growth. Technical indicators remain bullish on weekly and monthly timeframes, suggesting momentum remains intact despite the recent correction. The MACD, KST, and Bollinger Bands all signal continuation of the uptrend, though the RSI has turned bearish on the weekly chart—a cautionary note for short-term traders.

However, the valuation pillar remains the weakest link. At "Expensive" grade and trading near the upper end of fair value estimates, the stock offers limited downside protection if earnings disappoint or regulatory headwinds resurface. The proprietary Mojo Score of 77/100 translates to a "BUY" rating, but this sits at the lower end of the buy range (70-100), suggesting conviction is moderate rather than strong.

Key Strengths & Risk Factors

Outlook: What to Watch in Coming Quarters