Inducto Steel Q2 FY26: Losses Deepen as Revenue Plunges 53% Quarter-on-Quarter

Nov 15 2025 10:00 AM IST
share
Share Via
Inducto Steel Ltd., a micro-cap player in the iron and steel products sector with a market capitalisation of ₹24.00 crores, has reported deeply concerning results for Q2 FY26, with net losses widening to ₹0.75 crores from ₹0.25 crores in the previous quarter—a deterioration of 200% quarter-on-quarter. The company's net sales collapsed by 52.63% QoQ to ₹21.72 crores, marking the lowest quarterly revenue in the past seven quarters and raising serious questions about operational sustainability.



Year-on-year comparisons paint an equally bleak picture, with net sales declining 52.94% from ₹46.15 crores in Q2 FY25, whilst net losses narrowed marginally from ₹2.27 crores—offering little solace given the absolute loss position. The stock, trading at ₹58.73 as of November 14, 2025, has declined 11.51% over the past year, significantly underperforming the Sensex's 9.00% gain during the same period.





Net Loss (Q2 FY26)

₹0.75 Cr

▼ 200% QoQ



Net Sales (Q2 FY26)

₹21.72 Cr

▼ 52.63% QoQ



Operating Margin (Excl OI)

-3.78%

Negative Territory



PAT Margin

-3.45%

Loss Making




Financial Performance: A Quarter of Severe Deterioration



The Q2 FY26 results reveal a company in operational distress. Net sales of ₹21.72 crores represent the weakest quarterly performance since at least Mar'24, declining precipitously from ₹45.85 crores in Q1 FY26. This 52.63% sequential collapse suggests either severe demand disruption, operational challenges, or both. On a year-on-year basis, the 52.94% decline from ₹46.15 crores in Q2 FY25 indicates structural revenue pressures rather than seasonal volatility.



Operating profitability has deteriorated sharply. The company posted an operating loss (PBDIT excluding other income) of ₹0.82 crores in Q2 FY26, compared to a modest operating profit of ₹0.56 crores in the previous quarter. Operating margin (excluding other income) turned deeply negative at -3.78%, compared to a positive 1.22% in Q1 FY26. This margin compression of nearly 500 basis points quarter-on-quarter reflects both the revenue collapse and inadequate cost management.









































































Quarter Net Sales (₹ Cr) QoQ Change Net Profit (₹ Cr) QoQ Change Operating Margin %
Sep'25 21.72 -52.63% -0.75 +200.00% -3.78%
Jun'25 45.85 +14.08% -0.25 -516.67% 1.22%
Mar'25 40.19 +19.65% 0.06 -110.17% 2.39%
Dec'24 33.59 -27.22% -0.59 -74.01% -0.18%
Sep'24 46.15 +19.40% -2.27 +146.74% -6.67%
Jun'24 38.65 +86.44% -0.92 +441.18% -0.91%
Mar'24 20.73 -0.17 0.96%



Interest costs declined to ₹0.29 crores from ₹0.83 crores in Q1 FY26, providing marginal relief. However, this reduction was insufficient to offset the operating losses. The company's profit before tax stood at ₹-1.03 crores, with a tax credit of ₹0.28 crores (effective tax rate of 27.18%), resulting in a net loss of ₹0.75 crores. PAT margin deteriorated to -3.45% from -0.55% in the previous quarter.



On a half-yearly basis (H1 FY26), the company reported a cumulative net loss of ₹1.00 crores on revenues of ₹67.57 crores, representing a 20.32% decline in losses compared to H1 FY25. Whilst this suggests some improvement year-on-year, the absolute loss position and deteriorating quarterly trend remain deeply concerning.




Critical Red Flag: Revenue Volatility


Inducto Steel's quarterly revenue has swung wildly between ₹20.73 crores and ₹46.15 crores over the past seven quarters, indicating severe operational instability. The 52.63% QoQ collapse in Q2 FY26 to the lowest level in this period raises serious questions about business sustainability and management's ability to stabilise operations.




Operational Challenges: Weak Returns and Deteriorating Quality



Inducto Steel's operational metrics reveal a company struggling with fundamental profitability challenges. The company's average return on equity (ROE) over recent periods stands at a meagre 1.41%, significantly below acceptable thresholds for capital efficiency. The latest ROE has deteriorated further to -9.42%, reflecting the ongoing losses. For context, higher ROE values indicate better capital efficiency and profitability—Inducto Steel's single-digit positive average and deeply negative current ROE underscore severe profitability constraints.



Return on capital employed (ROCE) tells a similar story. The average ROCE of 10.96% appears modest, but the latest ROCE has plunged to -5.16%, indicating that the company is currently destroying value rather than generating returns on the capital deployed in its operations. The company's EBIT to interest coverage ratio averages just 0.36 times, meaning operating profits are insufficient to cover interest obligations—a precarious position for any enterprise.



The balance sheet presents a mixed picture. Shareholder funds stood at ₹39.49 crores as of Mar'25, down from ₹43.21 crores in Mar'24, reflecting the cumulative losses. The company maintains a debt-light structure with zero long-term debt, though current liabilities surged to ₹17.07 crores from ₹3.91 crores year-on-year. Fixed assets remain modest at ₹3.77 crores, whilst investments of ₹22.01 crores and current assets of ₹27.04 crores provide some cushion. However, the average net debt to equity ratio of 0.41 and debt to EBITDA of 0.95 suggest working capital pressures.




Quality Concerns: Below Average Fundamentals


Inducto Steel carries a "Below Average" quality grade based on long-term financial performance. Whilst the company demonstrates healthy 5-year sales growth of 55.00%, this is undermined by weak EBIT growth of just 8.73%, poor average ROCE of 10.96%, and negligible average ROE of 1.41%. The company's 43.28% promoter shareholding is entirely pledged, signalling financial stress at the ownership level. With zero institutional holdings and operating losses, the fundamental quality remains weak.




Cash Flow Dynamics: Operational Stress Evident



The cash flow statement for FY25 reveals significant operational challenges. Cash flow from operations turned sharply negative at ₹-11.00 crores, compared to ₹-1.00 crores in FY24, driven by adverse working capital changes of ₹-9.00 crores. This substantial working capital outflow suggests either inventory build-up, rising receivables, or both—concerning trends given the revenue pressures.



The company generated ₹1.00 crores from investing activities in FY25, reversing the ₹10.00 crores inflow in FY24, likely through asset disposals or investment liquidation. Financing activities provided ₹10.00 crores, compared to an outflow of ₹15.00 crores in the prior year, indicating increased reliance on external funding to support operations. The net result was a flat cash position, with closing cash at nil for both FY25 and FY24, down from ₹6.00 crores in FY23—a worrying trend that highlights liquidity constraints.



Industry Context: Underperforming a Weak Sector



The iron and steel products sector has faced headwinds, with the industry declining 22.06% over the past year. Inducto Steel's 11.51% decline over the same period represents a relative outperformance of 10.55 percentage points versus the sector—a silver lining in an otherwise challenging narrative. However, this outperformance is primarily due to the stock's micro-cap status and low liquidity rather than fundamental strength.



The broader steel sector has contended with volatile raw material prices, subdued demand from key consuming sectors like construction and infrastructure, and intense competition. Inducto Steel's business model—focused on ship breaking activities and trading in metal scrap, coals, and aluminium foil—exposes it to commodity price fluctuations and working capital intensity. The company's inability to maintain consistent revenue levels suggests challenges in securing regular business or managing cyclical demand patterns.



















































Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE % Debt to Equity
Inducto Steel NA (Loss Making) 0.60x 1.41% 0.41
Aryavan Enterprise 15.41x 1.56x 3.10% -0.01
Bloom Industries 63.16x 2.67x 4.32% 0.53
Natl. Gen. Industries 46.60x 0.67x 5.56% -0.24
Modern Steels 4.66x 1.26x 0.00% 0.01



Compared to peers, Inducto Steel trades at the lowest price-to-book ratio of 0.60x, reflecting market scepticism about asset quality and earnings power. The company's ROE of 1.41% trails most peers, with only Modern Steels reporting a lower figure. Whilst the debt-to-equity ratio of 0.41 appears manageable relative to some peers, the company's loss-making status and inability to generate positive returns on equity make direct comparisons challenging.



Valuation Analysis: Cheap for a Reason



At the current price of ₹58.73, Inducto Steel trades at a price-to-book value of 0.60x, representing a 40% discount to book value of ₹98.31 per share. This valuation appears attractive on the surface, but the discount reflects fundamental concerns rather than a genuine bargain. The company is loss-making, rendering traditional P/E multiples meaningless. The stock's EV/EBITDA multiple of 39.69x appears elevated, but this is distorted by the minimal and volatile EBITDA base.



The valuation grade has deteriorated from "Fair" to "Expensive" to "Very Expensive" and now sits at "Risky"—a classification that accurately captures the investment proposition. With negative earnings, deteriorating margins, and cash flow challenges, the below-book valuation reflects market concerns about asset realisability and going-concern risks rather than an attractive entry point.



The stock trades significantly below all major moving averages—5-day (₹60.54), 20-day (₹62.05), 50-day (₹64.35), 100-day (₹65.20), and 200-day (₹63.61)—indicating sustained downward pressure. The 52-week range of ₹47.26 to ₹88.50 shows the current price 33.64% below the high and 24.27% above the low, suggesting the stock has found some support but lacks positive catalysts for recovery.




"At 0.60x book value, Inducto Steel appears cheap, but this discount reflects genuine concerns about profitability, cash generation, and operational sustainability rather than a mispriced opportunity."


Shareholding: Stable but Concerning Promoter Pledge



The shareholding pattern has remained remarkably stable over the past five quarters, with promoter holding steady at 43.28% and non-institutional investors holding 30.68%. The lack of any foreign institutional investor (FII), mutual fund, insurance, or other domestic institutional investor (DII) participation is notable and concerning—institutional investors have completely shunned the stock, likely due to concerns about size, liquidity, and fundamental quality.



















































Shareholder Category Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 Dec'24
Promoter Holding 43.28% 43.28% 43.28% 43.28%
FII Holding 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Mutual Fund Holding 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Insurance Holdings 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Non-Institutional 30.68% 30.68% 30.68% 30.68%



The most alarming aspect of the shareholding structure is the 43.28% promoter pledge—meaning the entire promoter stake is encumbered. This represents a significant red flag, indicating that promoters have pledged their shares to raise funds, likely due to financial stress either at the company level or in their personal capacity. High promoter pledging increases the risk of forced selling if share prices decline further or if lenders demand additional collateral, potentially triggering a downward spiral.



Stock Performance: Sustained Underperformance



Inducto Steel's stock performance has been disappointing across most timeframes. Over the past year, the stock declined 11.51% whilst the Sensex gained 9.00%, resulting in a negative alpha of 20.51 percentage points. Recent performance has been particularly weak, with the stock down 8.09% over the past month compared to the Sensex's 3.09% gain, and down 4.88% over the past week against the Sensex's 1.62% rise.































































Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week -4.88% +1.62% -6.50%
1 Month -8.09% +3.09% -11.18%
3 Months +5.63% +4.92% +0.71%
6 Months -6.60% +3.97% -10.57%
YTD -25.23% +8.22% -33.45%
1 Year -11.51% +9.00% -20.51%
2 Years +26.30% +30.23% -3.93%
3 Years +47.19% +37.22% +9.97%



Longer-term returns show more mixed results. The stock gained 26.30% over two years (marginally underperforming the Sensex's 30.23%) and 47.19% over three years (outperforming the Sensex's 37.22% by nearly 10 percentage points). However, these gains were achieved from much lower bases and do not reflect the current deteriorating fundamental trajectory.



The stock exhibits high volatility with a beta of 1.50, meaning it tends to move 50% more than the broader market. With a volatility of 58.88% over the past year, the stock falls into the "High Risk, Low Return" category—a particularly unattractive combination for investors. The negative risk-adjusted return of -0.20 confirms that the stock has not compensated investors adequately for the elevated risk undertaken.



Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags Outweigh Valuation Discount



The investment thesis for Inducto Steel is challenged by multiple structural concerns. The company's proprietary score stands at just 26 out of 100, firmly in "Strong Sell" territory. This score reflects the confluence of negative factors: deteriorating financial trends, weak long-term fundamental strength with operating losses, and significant underperformance versus the market over the past year.



The technical picture offers no respite. The stock is in a sideways trend as of November 13, 2025, having recently shifted from a "Mildly Bullish" stance. Weekly MACD signals remain bearish, Bollinger Bands indicate bearish momentum, and the stock trades below all major moving averages. With immediate support at the 52-week low of ₹47.26 and resistance at ₹62.05, the technical setup suggests limited upside potential and continued downward pressure.





Key Strengths



  • Debt-light balance sheet with zero long-term debt

  • Trading at 0.60x book value—40% discount to book

  • Relative outperformance vs sector (-11.51% vs -22.06%)

  • 5-year sales CAGR of 55% shows historical growth capability

  • Stable shareholding pattern with no promoter selling




Key Concerns



  • Persistent losses with Q2 FY26 net loss at ₹0.75 crores

  • Severe revenue volatility—52.63% QoQ collapse in Q2

  • Negative operating margins of -3.78% in latest quarter

  • Entire 43.28% promoter stake pledged—major red flag

  • Zero institutional investor participation

  • Weak ROE of 1.41% average, -9.42% latest

  • Negative cash flow from operations of ₹-11 crores in FY25

  • High beta of 1.50 with 58.88% volatility





Outlook: What to Watch





Positive Catalysts



  • Stabilisation of quarterly revenues above ₹40 crores

  • Return to positive operating profitability

  • Reduction in promoter pledge levels

  • Improvement in working capital management

  • Positive cash flow from operations




Red Flags



  • Further revenue decline below ₹20 crores quarterly

  • Continued negative operating margins

  • Increase in promoter pledging or forced selling

  • Rising current liabilities without revenue growth

  • Break below 52-week low of ₹47.26






The Verdict: Avoid This Value Trap


STRONG SELL

Score: 26/100


For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions. The combination of deteriorating financials, complete promoter pledge, zero institutional interest, and persistent losses makes this a high-risk proposition. The below-book valuation is a value trap, not an opportunity.


For Existing Holders: Consider exiting on any relief rallies towards ₹62-65 levels. The fundamental trajectory is negative, and the 43.28% promoter pledge creates significant downside risk if share prices decline further or lenders demand additional collateral.


Fair Value Estimate: ₹45-50 (23% downside risk from current levels), reflecting the poor earnings quality, operational challenges, and elevated risk profile.





Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)





⚠️ Investment Disclaimer


This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.





{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News