Ishita Drugs Q2 FY26: Profit Slumps 26% as Revenue Volatility Persists

2 hours ago
share
Share Via
Ishita Drugs & Industries Ltd., a micro-cap pharmaceutical manufacturer with a market capitalisation of ₹21.00 crores, reported disappointing results for Q2 FY26, with net profit declining 26.32% quarter-on-quarter to ₹0.14 crores from ₹0.30 crores in Q1 FY26. The sharp contraction in profitability came despite the company maintaining a relatively stable operating margin profile, raising concerns about the sustainability of earnings amidst persistent revenue volatility.
Ishita Drugs Q2 FY26: Profit Slumps 26% as Revenue Volatility Persists
Net Profit (Q2 FY26)
₹0.14 Cr
▼ 26.32% QoQ
Revenue (Q2 FY26)
₹3.07 Cr
▼ 43.15% QoQ
Operating Margin
6.19%
▼ 29 bps QoQ
ROE (Average)
8.40%
Below Industry Standards

The stock, trading at ₹72.98 as of February 6, 2026, has underperformed significantly over the past year, declining 11.38% compared to a 7.07% gain in the Sensex, resulting in a negative alpha of 18.45 percentage points. The company's technical indicators remain firmly bearish, with the stock trading below all key moving averages and locked in a downtrend since October 2025.

While Ishita Drugs benefits from zero debt and a clean balance sheet, the company's weak return on equity of 8.40% and persistent quarterly earnings volatility continue to undermine investor confidence. The proprietary Mojo Score stands at a concerning 23 out of 100, placing the stock firmly in "Strong Sell" territory.

Quarter Revenue (₹ Cr) QoQ Change Net Profit (₹ Cr) QoQ Change Operating Margin
Sep'25 (Q2) 3.07 -43.15% 0.14 -53.33% 6.19%
Jun'25 (Q1) 5.40 +18.42% 0.30 +3.45% 6.48%
Mar'25 (Q4) 4.56 +10.41% 0.29 +20.83% 6.36%
Dec'24 (Q3) 4.13 +26.30% 0.24 +26.32% 7.26%
Sep'24 (Q2) 3.27 +7.92% 0.19 +26.67% 7.34%
Jun'24 (Q1) 3.03 -32.67% 0.15 -46.43% 5.94%
Mar'24 (Q4) 4.50 0.28 6.67%

Financial Performance: Revenue Whiplash Undermines Profitability

Ishita Drugs' Q2 FY26 results highlight a troubling pattern of revenue instability that has plagued the company for several quarters. Net sales plunged 43.15% quarter-on-quarter to ₹3.07 crores from ₹5.40 crores in Q1 FY26, marking one of the sharpest sequential contractions in recent memory. On a year-on-year basis, revenue declined 6.12% from ₹3.27 crores in Q2 FY25, reflecting the company's struggle to establish consistent growth momentum.

Operating profit before depreciation, interest, and tax (excluding other income) contracted to ₹0.19 crores from ₹0.35 crores in the previous quarter, though the operating margin remained relatively stable at 6.19% compared to 6.48% in Q1 FY26. This marginal compression of 29 basis points suggests that the company maintained reasonable cost discipline despite the revenue headwinds, though the absolute profit pool shrunk significantly due to lower sales volume.

Net profit after tax collapsed to ₹0.14 crores in Q2 FY26 from ₹0.30 crores in Q1 FY26, representing a 53.33% quarter-on-quarter decline. The PAT margin compressed to 4.56% from 5.56% in the previous quarter, indicating that the company's profitability suffered disproportionately relative to the revenue decline. On a year-on-year basis, net profit declined 26.32% from ₹0.19 crores in Q2 FY25.

Revenue (Q2 FY26)
₹3.07 Cr
▼ 43.15% QoQ | ▼ 6.12% YoY
Net Profit (Q2 FY26)
₹0.14 Cr
▼ 53.33% QoQ | ▼ 26.32% YoY
Operating Margin
6.19%
▼ 29 bps QoQ
PAT Margin
4.56%
▼ 100 bps QoQ

The tax rate spiked to 36.36% in Q2 FY26 from 23.08% in Q1 FY26, adding further pressure on bottom-line profitability. This elevated tax burden, combined with the revenue contraction, created a challenging environment for earnings generation during the quarter.

Operational Challenges: Weak Capital Efficiency Raises Red Flags

Ishita Drugs' operational metrics paint a concerning picture of a company struggling to generate adequate returns for shareholders. The average return on equity over recent years stands at a weak 8.40%, significantly below industry standards and indicating poor capital efficiency. This low ROE suggests that the company is generating less than ₹8.40 of profit for every ₹100 of shareholder equity, a performance level that fails to meet the cost of capital for most equity investors.

While the company's average return on capital employed (ROCE) appears stronger at 36.73%, this metric must be viewed with caution given the company's minimal debt and small capital base. The average EBIT to interest coverage ratio of 0.85 times indicates that the company's earnings barely cover its interest obligations, though this is less concerning given the negligible debt levels on the balance sheet.

On a positive note, Ishita Drugs operates with virtually zero debt, maintaining an average net debt to equity ratio of negative 0.41, effectively making it a net cash company. The balance sheet shows shareholder funds of ₹10.79 crores as of March 2025, with minimal long-term debt of just ₹0.09 crores. This conservative capital structure provides financial flexibility and eliminates solvency concerns, though it also raises questions about whether the company is adequately leveraging its balance sheet to drive growth.

Critical Concern: Persistent Earnings Volatility

Ishita Drugs has demonstrated extreme quarter-to-quarter earnings volatility, with net profit swinging from ₹0.15 crores to ₹0.30 crores to ₹0.14 crores over the past three quarters. This unpredictability makes the stock unsuitable for investors seeking stable, predictable returns and raises questions about the sustainability of the business model.

Industry Context: Underperforming a Resilient Sector

The broader pharmaceuticals and biotechnology sector has demonstrated relative resilience over the past year, declining just 0.75% compared to Ishita Drugs' 11.38% drop. This 10.63 percentage point underperformance versus the sector benchmark highlights company-specific challenges rather than broader industry headwinds.

Indian pharmaceutical companies have generally benefited from steady domestic demand, export opportunities, and improving operating leverage. However, Ishita Drugs' micro-cap status and limited scale appear to be hindering its ability to participate in these favourable industry dynamics. The company's 5-year sales growth of just 4.99% compounded annually trails the industry average, while its 5-year EBIT growth of 7.71% suggests minimal operating leverage despite the passage of time.

The company's focus on active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), drug intermediates, fine chemicals, and excipients positions it in a competitive segment where scale advantages and technical capabilities drive success. Larger peers with established customer relationships and diversified product portfolios have been better positioned to navigate raw material cost fluctuations and demand volatility.

Peer Comparison: Valuation Premium Unjustified by Fundamentals

A comparison with micro-cap pharmaceutical peers reveals that Ishita Drugs trades at a valuation that appears stretched relative to its operational performance. While the company's P/E ratio of 22.50 times trailing twelve-month earnings appears reasonable compared to some peers, its return on equity of 8.40% is among the highest in the peer group, though still weak in absolute terms.

Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE (%) Debt/Equity
Ishita Drugs 22.50 2.02 8.40% -0.41
Chandra Bhagat 37.02 1.05 2.87% 0.61
Medi Caps NA (Loss Making) 0.26 1.46% -0.21
Venmax Drugs NA (Loss Making) 5.70 0.00% -0.56
Shree Ganesh Bio NA (Loss Making) 0.41 2.62% -0.12
Zenith Health NA (Loss Making) 2.41 2.44% -0.15

Ishita Drugs' price-to-book ratio of 2.02 times is the highest among profitable peers in this micro-cap segment, suggesting that the market is pricing in expectations for improved performance that have yet to materialise. The company's debt-free status provides some justification for a modest valuation premium, but the weak ROE and persistent earnings volatility argue against the current multiple.

Valuation Analysis: Attractive Grade Masks Fundamental Weakness

Despite receiving an "Attractive" valuation grade from proprietary models, Ishita Drugs' valuation must be viewed through the lens of its operational challenges. The P/E ratio of 22.50 times compares favourably to the industry average of 32 times, while the EV/EBITDA multiple of 15.37 times and EV/Sales ratio of 1.01 times suggest reasonable pricing on conventional metrics.

However, these valuation multiples can be misleading for a company with such volatile earnings and weak return ratios. The PEG ratio of 0.72 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate, but this metric loses relevance when earnings quality is questionable and historical growth has been inconsistent.

P/E Ratio (TTM)
22.50x
vs Industry 32x
P/BV Ratio
2.02x
Premium to Peers
EV/EBITDA
15.37x
Moderate
Mojo Score
23/100
Strong Sell

The stock currently trades 19.67% below its 52-week high of ₹90.85 and 17.05% above its 52-week low of ₹62.35, positioning it in the middle of its trading range. The valuation grade has fluctuated between "Attractive" and "Fair" over the past several months, reflecting the market's uncertainty about the company's prospects.

Shareholding Pattern: Promoters Incrementally Increasing Stake

The shareholding pattern reveals gradual promoter accumulation, with promoter holdings increasing from 49.84% in December 2024 to 50.04% in December 2025. This modest 20 basis point increase over four quarters suggests confidence from the controlling shareholders, though the pace of accumulation is hardly aggressive.

Quarter Promoter % QoQ Change FII % Mutual Fund % Non-Institutional %
Dec'25 50.04% +0.08% 0.00% 0.00% 49.96%
Sep'25 49.96% +0.04% 0.00% 0.00% 50.04%
Jun'25 49.92% +0.01% 0.00% 0.00% 50.08%
Mar'25 49.91% +0.07% 0.00% 0.00% 50.09%
Dec'24 49.84% 0.00% 0.00% 50.16%

Notably, the stock has zero institutional holdings, with no presence from foreign institutional investors, mutual funds, or insurance companies. This complete absence of institutional participation is a significant red flag, as professional investors typically conduct rigorous due diligence before deploying capital. The lack of institutional interest suggests concerns about the company's scale, liquidity, governance, or growth prospects.

The promoter group is led by Umang Financial Services Limited (9.94%), Abha Agrawal (8.39%), and Sumit Agrawal (7.76%), with no pledged shares, which is a positive indicator of financial health and commitment.

Stock Performance: Persistent Underperformance Across Timeframes

Ishita Drugs' stock performance has been disappointing across most meaningful timeframes, with particularly weak results over the past one to two years. The stock has declined 11.38% over the past year compared to the Sensex's 7.07% gain, resulting in a negative alpha of 18.45 percentage points. Over two years, the underperformance widens to 24.88 percentage points, with the stock declining 9.10% versus the Sensex's 15.78% gain.

Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week +6.73% +1.59% +5.14%
1 Month -0.73% -1.74% +1.01%
3 Months +1.87% +0.32% +1.55%
YTD -8.78% -1.92% -6.86%
1 Year -11.38% +7.07% -18.45%
2 Years -9.10% +15.78% -24.88%
3 Years +47.58% +38.13% +9.45%
5 Years +136.95% +64.75% +72.20%

The longer-term picture is more favourable, with the stock generating positive alpha over three, five, and ten-year periods. The five-year return of 136.95% versus the Sensex's 64.75% demonstrates that patient investors have been rewarded, though recent momentum has turned decisively negative.

From a technical perspective, the stock is firmly in bearish territory, trading below all key moving averages. The current price of ₹72.98 sits below the 5-day (₹70.80), 20-day (₹71.67), 50-day (₹73.57), 100-day (₹74.40), and 200-day (₹75.92) moving averages. The MACD indicator shows bearish signals on both weekly and monthly charts, while the stock's beta of 1.50 indicates higher volatility than the broader market.

"With earnings volatility at extreme levels, zero institutional participation, and weak return ratios, Ishita Drugs exemplifies the risks inherent in micro-cap pharmaceutical investing."

Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags Outweigh Valuation Appeal

The investment thesis for Ishita Drugs is severely compromised by a confluence of negative factors that outweigh the superficial appeal of "attractive" valuation metrics. The company's Mojo Score of 23 out of 100 reflects below-average quality, flat financial trends, and bearish technical momentum, with only the valuation grade providing any support.

Valuation
Attractive
Quality Grade
Below Average
Financial Trend
Flat
Technical Trend
Bearish

The quality assessment reveals fundamental weaknesses: average ROE of just 8.40%, indicating poor capital efficiency; 5-year sales growth of only 4.99%; and complete absence of institutional holdings. While the debt-free balance sheet and zero promoter pledging are positives, they cannot compensate for the weak operational performance and earnings instability.

Key Strengths & Risk Factors

Key Strengths

  • Zero debt company with negative net debt to equity of -0.41, providing financial flexibility
  • No promoter pledging, indicating strong promoter commitment and financial health
  • Attractive valuation on conventional metrics with P/E of 22.50x versus industry 32x
  • Strong long-term returns with 5-year stock performance of +136.95%
  • Gradual promoter accumulation over past four quarters signals insider confidence

Key Concerns

  • Extreme earnings volatility with net profit swinging wildly quarter-to-quarter
  • Weak ROE of 8.40% indicates poor capital efficiency and below-cost-of-capital returns
  • Zero institutional holdings signals lack of professional investor confidence
  • Revenue declined 43.15% QoQ and 6.12% YoY in Q2 FY26
  • Bearish technical trend with stock below all moving averages
  • Micro-cap status limits liquidity and institutional participation
  • Underperformed sector by 10.63 percentage points over past year

Outlook: What to Watch

Positive Catalysts

  • Sustained revenue stabilisation above ₹4.50 crores per quarter for at least three consecutive quarters
  • Operating margin expansion above 8% demonstrating improved pricing power or cost efficiency
  • ROE improvement above 12% indicating better capital allocation and operational leverage
  • Entry of institutional investors (mutual funds or FIIs) validating business quality
  • Successful product launches or client additions driving sustainable growth

Red Flags

  • Further quarter-on-quarter revenue declines exceeding 20%
  • Operating margins falling below 5% indicating pricing pressure or cost inflation
  • ROE declining below 6% signalling deteriorating capital efficiency
  • Promoter stake reduction or any introduction of pledging
  • Working capital deterioration with negative cash flow from operations persisting

The Verdict: Avoid This High-Risk Micro-Cap

STRONG SELL

Score: 23/100

For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions. The combination of extreme earnings volatility, weak return on equity, zero institutional participation, and bearish technical momentum creates an unfavourable risk-reward profile. The "attractive" valuation is a value trap rather than an opportunity, as the company has failed to demonstrate consistent operational execution or earnings quality.

For Existing Holders: Consider exiting positions, particularly if the stock rallies toward the ₹75-78 range (approaching 100-day and 200-day moving averages). The persistent underperformance, weak fundamentals, and deteriorating financial trends suggest limited upside and continued volatility ahead. The Q2 FY26 results reinforce concerns about the sustainability of the business model.

Fair Value Estimate: ₹65-68 (9.74% downside from current levels), based on sustainable earnings power of ₹0.70-0.80 crores annually and a fair P/E multiple of 18-20x given the quality concerns.

Note— ROCE = (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)

⚠️ Investment Disclaimer

This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News