Iykot Hitech Toolroom Q2 FY26: Mounting Losses Deepen as Revenue Collapses 64.53%

Feb 06 2026 09:04 PM IST
share
Share Via
Iykot Hitech Toolroom Limited, a micro-cap industrial manufacturing company with a market capitalisation of ₹13.00 crores, reported deeply troubling Q2 FY26 results that underscore accelerating operational distress. The Chennai-based plastic moulded components manufacturer posted a net loss of ₹0.41 crores for the quarter ended September 2025, representing a sequential deterioration of 17.14% from Q1 FY26's loss of ₹0.35 crores and a staggering widening from Q2 FY25's loss of ₹0.07 crores. The stock has plunged 4.98% following the results announcement, trading at ₹12.59 and reflecting investor alarm over the company's deteriorating fundamentals.
Iykot Hitech Toolroom Q2 FY26: Mounting Losses Deepen as Revenue Collapses 64.53%
Net Loss (Q2 FY26)
-₹0.41 Cr
▼ 485.71% YoY
Revenue (Q2 FY26)
₹0.61 Cr
▼ 64.53% YoY
Operating Margin
-63.93%
From -1.74% YoY
PAT Margin
-67.21%
From -4.07% YoY

The results paint a grim picture of a company in severe operational crisis. With revenue collapsing by 64.53% year-on-year to just ₹0.61 crores in Q2 FY26, Iykot Hitech's business appears to be unravelling at an alarming pace. The sequential revenue decline of 10.29% from Q1 FY26's ₹0.68 crores further confirms negative momentum. What's particularly concerning is the company's inability to contain costs despite shrinking topline—operating losses before depreciation, interest, tax, and other income widened to ₹0.39 crores, translating to a catastrophic operating margin of -63.93%. This represents a dramatic deterioration from the -1.74% operating margin recorded in Q2 FY25, signalling complete loss of operational control.

Quarter Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 Dec'24 Sep'24 Jun'24 Mar'24
Net Sales (₹ Cr) 0.61 0.68 0.97 0.77 1.72 1.55 0.07
QoQ Growth -10.29% -29.90% +25.97% -55.23% +10.97% +2114.29%
YoY Growth -64.53% -56.13% +1285.71%
Net Profit (₹ Cr) -0.41 -0.35 -0.27 -0.15 -0.07 -0.56 -0.78
Operating Margin -63.93% -50.00% -26.80% -12.99% -1.74% -33.55% -1014.29%
PAT Margin -67.21% -51.47% -27.84% -19.48% -4.07% -36.13% -1114.29%

Financial Performance: A Company in Free Fall

The financial performance in Q2 FY26 can only be described as catastrophic. Net sales of ₹0.61 crores represent a collapse from ₹1.72 crores in the year-ago quarter, a decline of 64.53% that speaks to either severe market share losses, customer attrition, or fundamental business model failure. The sequential decline of 10.29% from Q1 FY26 confirms that this isn't a one-off aberration but rather a sustained downward trajectory. Even more alarming is that this revenue level represents barely one-third of the ₹1.72 crores achieved just four quarters ago in Q2 FY25.

The cost structure has become completely disconnected from revenue reality. Operating profit before depreciation, interest, tax, and other income stood at a negative ₹0.39 crores in Q2 FY26, translating to an operating margin of -63.93%. This represents a catastrophic deterioration from the -1.74% margin in Q2 FY25 and -50.00% in Q1 FY26. The company is burning ₹0.64 in operating costs for every rupee of revenue generated—a completely unsustainable equation. Employee costs of ₹0.11 crores remained stable, but represent 18.03% of revenues, indicating severe overhead burden relative to the shrunken topline.

Revenue (Q2 FY26)
₹0.61 Cr
▼ 10.29% QoQ | ▼ 64.53% YoY
Net Loss (Q2 FY26)
-₹0.41 Cr
▼ 17.14% QoQ | ▼ 485.71% YoY
Operating Margin
-63.93%
From -50.00% QoQ
PAT Margin
-67.21%
From -51.47% QoQ

The bottom-line deterioration is equally severe. Net loss widened to ₹0.41 crores in Q2 FY26 from ₹0.35 crores in Q1 FY26 and ₹0.07 crores in Q2 FY25—a year-on-year deterioration of 485.71%. The PAT margin collapsed to -67.21% from -4.07% a year ago, indicating that the company is destroying value at an accelerating rate. With negligible interest costs and minimal depreciation charges, the losses are purely operational in nature, reflecting fundamental business viability issues rather than financial structure problems.

Operational Collapse: When Business Models Break

The operational metrics reveal a company whose business model has fundamentally broken down. The five-year sales growth rate stands at a negative 8.65%, whilst EBIT growth has contracted at a devastating 27.52% annually over the same period. These aren't cyclical fluctuations—they represent structural deterioration in the company's ability to generate and sustain revenues. The average return on capital employed (ROCE) over recent years stands at a deeply negative 40.11%, indicating that the company destroys 40 paise for every rupee of capital deployed. The latest ROCE of -30.65% shows marginal improvement but remains catastrophically negative.

Return on equity (ROE) tells a similarly dire story. The average ROE of just 1.21% over recent periods indicates virtually no value creation for shareholders, whilst the latest ROE of -29.35% confirms active value destruction. For context, even a risk-free government bond would provide superior returns, making the equity investment case completely untenable at current operational performance levels. The company's average EBIT to interest coverage ratio of -0.93x underscores the severity—the business generates negative operating profits that cannot even theoretically cover interest obligations, though minimal debt levels mean this hasn't yet triggered a solvency crisis.

Critical Operational Red Flags

Catastrophic Margin Collapse: Operating margin deteriorated from -1.74% in Q2 FY25 to -63.93% in Q2 FY26, indicating complete loss of operational viability. The company burns ₹0.64 in costs for every ₹1.00 of revenue.

Revenue Destruction: Sales have collapsed 64.53% year-on-year, falling to just ₹0.61 crores—barely 35% of year-ago levels. This isn't cyclical weakness; it's structural business failure.

Negative Returns: ROCE of -30.65% and ROE of -29.35% confirm systematic capital destruction with no path to profitability visible.

The balance sheet provides little comfort. Whilst the company maintains a net cash position with negligible debt (net debt to equity of -0.04), shareholder funds have eroded to just ₹2.64 crores as of March 2025 from ₹4.32 crores in March 2022—a 38.89% destruction of equity capital in three years. Reserves and surplus turned negative at ₹-2.18 crores, indicating accumulated losses have consumed most of the equity base. The company's book value per share stands at ₹2.74, yet the stock trades at ₹12.59, implying a price-to-book ratio of 3.19x—a valuation multiple that appears completely divorced from operational reality.

Industry Context: Struggling in a Challenging Sector

Iykot Hitech operates in the industrial manufacturing sector, specifically manufacturing plastic moulded components for white goods, automobiles, and entertainment electronics. This is a highly competitive, low-margin business requiring scale, operational efficiency, and strong customer relationships. The company's inability to maintain revenue levels suggests either loss of key customers, competitive displacement, or product obsolescence. The broader industrial manufacturing sector has faced headwinds from raw material inflation, supply chain disruptions, and pricing pressures, but Iykot's performance significantly underperforms even distressed sector benchmarks.

The company's factory location in Nagalkeni, Chennai, places it in a competitive manufacturing hub with numerous alternatives available to customers. The plastic components business is particularly price-sensitive with limited differentiation potential, making customer retention challenging when operational issues arise. The dramatic revenue collapse from ₹1.72 crores in Q2 FY25 to ₹0.61 crores in Q2 FY26 suggests either loss of major contracts or severe production/quality issues that have driven customers to alternative suppliers.

Sector Positioning: Bottom Quartile Performance

Within the industrial manufacturing peer group, Iykot Hitech ranks at the bottom across virtually all metrics. With a market capitalisation of just ₹13.00 crores, it is the smallest player amongst its peers. The company's ROE of 1.21% (average) trails peers, whilst its negative operating margins place it in severe distress territory. The lack of institutional interest—just 7.87% institutional holdings—reflects professional investors' assessment of the company as uninvestable at current operational performance levels.

Peer Comparison: Last Among Equals

Comparing Iykot Hitech to its industrial manufacturing peers reveals just how far the company has fallen behind. Whilst direct operational comparisons are challenging given the diverse nature of industrial manufacturing, valuation and return metrics provide useful context. The peer group includes companies like Lippi Systems, Benara Bearings, Pan Electronics, Thakral Services, and Shivagrico Implements—most of which are similarly distressed or loss-making entities.

Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE (%) Debt/Equity Div Yield
Iykot Hitech NA (Loss Making) 3.19 1.21% -0.04 NA
Lippi Systems NA (Loss Making) 0.94 0.00% 0.10 NA
Benara Bearings NA (Loss Making) -2.01 1.97% -7.35 NA
Pan Electronics NA (Loss Making) -0.55 0.00% -1.36 NA
Thakral Services NA (Loss Making) -1.65 0.00% -0.86 NA
Shivagrico Impl. 32.23 1.69 4.29% 1.97 NA

What stands out immediately is that Iykot Hitech trades at a price-to-book ratio of 3.19x—the highest in its peer group and dramatically above peers trading at or below book value. This valuation premium appears completely unjustified given the company's operational performance. Shivagrico Implements, the only profitable peer with a positive P/E ratio of 32.23x, generates an ROE of 4.29%—more than three times Iykot's average ROE of 1.21%. Yet Iykot trades at nearly double Shivagrico's P/BV of 1.69x, highlighting severe valuation dislocation.

The institutional holdings comparison is equally telling. At 7.87%, Iykot Hitech has minimal institutional participation, reflecting professional investors' assessment of the investment case as deeply flawed. None of the peers show meaningful FII or mutual fund holdings, indicating the entire micro-cap industrial manufacturing space is shunned by quality-focused institutional investors. The lack of dividend yields across the board reflects the sector's cash generation challenges and inability to reward shareholders.

Valuation Analysis: Expensive for All the Wrong Reasons

The valuation metrics present a paradox: a fundamentally broken business trading at premium multiples. With a market capitalisation of ₹13.00 crores and a current price of ₹12.59, Iykot Hitech trades at 3.19 times book value despite generating negative returns on equity. The P/E ratio is not applicable given persistent losses, whilst the EV/EBITDA multiple of -11.61x reflects negative EBITDA generation. The enterprise value to sales ratio of 4.13x appears elevated for a company with collapsing revenues and negative margins.

The stock's 52-week range of ₹10.20 to ₹18.11 shows considerable volatility, with the current price of ₹12.59 sitting 30.48% below the 52-week high and 23.43% above the 52-week low. This positioning suggests the market has partially recognised the deteriorating fundamentals but hasn't fully priced in the severity of operational collapse. The valuation assessment of "RISKY" by proprietary models understates the situation—this isn't just risky, it's potentially terminal without dramatic operational turnaround.

P/E Ratio (TTM)
NA (Loss Making)
Industry: 31x
Price to Book
3.19x
Despite negative ROE
EV/Sales
4.13x
Elevated for distressed asset
Dividend Yield
0.00%
Last dividend: Sep 2019

The absence of dividend payments since September 2019—when the company paid ₹0.35 per share—reflects the prolonged period of financial distress. With accumulated losses consuming equity capital and negative cash flow from operations of ₹2.00 crores in FY25, dividend resumption appears impossible in the foreseeable future. The company's fair value is exceptionally difficult to estimate given negative earnings and deteriorating operations, but any reasonable discounted cash flow analysis would suggest substantial downside from current levels.

Shareholding Pattern: Promoter Reduction Raises Alarms

The shareholding pattern reveals a concerning development: promoter holding declined sharply to 66.29% in December 2025 from 74.09% in the previous three quarters, representing a 7.80 percentage point reduction. This stake sale by promoters—the individuals most intimately familiar with the business—during a period of severe operational distress sends a deeply negative signal about their confidence in turnaround prospects. The corresponding 7.80 percentage point increase in other DII holdings to 7.87% suggests some institutional buyer stepped in, though this appears to be an isolated transaction rather than broad institutional interest.

Quarter Dec'25 Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 Dec'24
Promoter % 66.29% 74.09% 74.09% 74.09% 74.09%
Change -7.80%
FII % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Mutual Fund % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Other DII % 7.87% 0.07% 0.07% 0.07% 0.07%
Change +7.80%
Public % 25.84% 25.84% 25.84% 25.84% 25.84%

The complete absence of FII and mutual fund holdings underscores the company's status as uninvestable by institutional quality standards. Foreign institutional investors and domestic mutual funds—which employ rigorous screening processes—have zero exposure, reflecting assessment that the risk-reward equation is fundamentally unattractive. The stable 25.84% public shareholding suggests retail investors remain trapped or unaware of the deteriorating fundamentals, though recent price declines indicate some retail capitulation may be underway.

Promoter composition includes Padam Dugar (24.00%), P Annjana Dugar (20.00%), Likhitta Dugar (12.00%), and Antariksh Dugar (9.15%), amongst others. The recent stake reduction suggests either capital needs forcing promoter selling or loss of confidence in turnaround prospects. Positively, there is no promoter pledging, indicating no immediate solvency concerns despite operational distress. However, the combination of promoter selling during crisis and zero institutional interest creates a highly unfavourable technical setup.

Stock Performance: Long-Term Gains Mask Recent Destruction

The stock price performance presents a bifurcated picture: exceptional long-term returns masking recent devastation. Over a 10-year horizon, Iykot Hitech has delivered returns of 564.04% compared to the Sensex's 239.52%, generating alpha of 324.52 percentage points. Similarly, five-year returns of 383.74% dramatically outperformed the Sensex's 64.75%, producing 318.99 percentage points of alpha. These historical returns reflect the stock's journey from deeply distressed levels rather than operational excellence, as investors who bought at crisis valuations in 2015-2016 benefited from subsequent recovery attempts.

Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week -10.90% +1.59% -12.49%
1 Month +0.88% -1.74% +2.62%
3 Month +16.79% +0.32% +16.47%
6 Month -8.83% +3.77% -12.60%
YTD +2.27% -1.92% +4.19%
2 Years -0.62% +15.78% -16.40%
3 Years +59.23% +38.13% +21.10%
5 Years +383.74% +64.75% +318.99%
10 Years +564.04% +239.52% +324.52%

However, recent performance tells a dramatically different story. The stock has declined 10.90% over the past week, underperforming the Sensex by 12.49 percentage points as Q2 results triggered selling pressure. Over six months, the stock has fallen 8.83% whilst the Sensex gained 3.77%, generating negative alpha of 12.60 percentage points. The two-year return of -0.62% versus the Sensex's +15.78% gain confirms the recent operational deterioration has destroyed shareholder value. The stock currently trades below all major moving averages—5-day (₹13.33), 20-day (₹14.53), 50-day (₹13.44), and 100-day (₹13.12)—indicating established downtrend momentum.

The technical picture is decidedly negative. The stock shifted to "MILDLY BEARISH" trend on February 1, 2026, at ₹13.43, having previously been in sideways consolidation. Weekly MACD shows bullish signals, but this appears to be a false positive given deteriorating fundamentals and monthly MACD turning mildly bearish. Bollinger Bands show bearish signals on both weekly and monthly timeframes, indicating continued downside pressure. The immediate support at ₹10.20 (52-week low) appears vulnerable, whilst resistance at ₹14.53 (20-day moving average) looks formidable given negative momentum.

Investment Thesis: Value Destruction in Progress

The investment thesis for Iykot Hitech Toolroom is unequivocally negative across all critical parameters. The company's proprietary Mojo Score stands at just 17 out of 100, firmly in "STRONG SELL" territory. This assessment reflects the confluence of deteriorating fundamentals, bearish technicals, risky valuation, and below-average quality. The recommendation is unambiguous: existing shareholders should strongly consider exiting, whilst fresh investors should avoid entirely.

Valuation
RISKY
Premium to book despite losses
Quality Grade
BELOW AVERAGE
Negative ROCE, weak ROE
Financial Trend
FLAT
Deteriorating from weak base
Technical Trend
MILDLY BEARISH
Below all moving averages

The valuation assessment of "RISKY" reflects a stock trading at 3.19 times book value despite generating negative returns on equity and persistent losses. This valuation dislocation creates significant downside risk as the market reprices the stock towards distressed asset levels. The quality grade of "BELOW AVERAGE" is generous given the company's operational metrics—negative ROCE of -30.65%, ROE of -29.35%, five-year sales contraction of 8.65%, and EBIT decline of 27.52% annually. These aren't characteristics of a below-average company; they're hallmarks of a failing business.

The financial trend classification of "FLAT" masks underlying deterioration. Whilst the trend hasn't been downgraded to negative, the quarterly results show accelerating losses, collapsing revenues, and widening negative margins—all indicators that suggest an imminent trend downgrade. The technical trend of "MILDLY BEARISH" combined with the stock trading below all major moving averages indicates established downward momentum with limited near-term catalysts for reversal.

"With operating margins of -63.93%, revenue collapsing 64.53% year-on-year, and losses widening to ₹0.41 crores, Iykot Hitech exemplifies a business in terminal decline absent dramatic intervention."

Key Strengths & Risk Factors

Key Strengths

  • Debt-Free Balance Sheet: Net cash position with negligible debt provides temporary financial cushion, though this is being rapidly consumed by operating losses.
  • No Promoter Pledging: Zero promoter share pledging indicates no immediate solvency crisis or forced selling pressure from lenders.
  • Long Operating History: Established since 1991 with manufacturing infrastructure in Chennai provides potential turnaround foundation if management can stabilise operations.
  • Micro-Cap Volatility Potential: Extremely small market capitalisation of ₹13.00 crores creates potential for sharp moves on any positive development, though this cuts both ways.

Key Concerns

  • Catastrophic Revenue Collapse: Sales declined 64.53% year-on-year to just ₹0.61 crores, indicating loss of customers, market share, or fundamental business viability.
  • Unsustainable Loss Profile: Operating margin of -63.93% and PAT margin of -67.21% represent value destruction on every rupee of sales generated.
  • Persistent Negative Returns: ROCE of -30.65% and ROE of -29.35% confirm systematic capital destruction with no turnaround evidence.
  • Promoter Stake Reduction: Promoter holding declined 7.80 percentage points to 66.29% during crisis period, signalling loss of confidence from those most knowledgeable about the business.
  • Zero Institutional Interest: Complete absence of FII and mutual fund holdings reflects professional investor assessment of the company as uninvestable.
  • Equity Capital Erosion: Shareholder funds declined from ₹4.32 crores (Mar'22) to ₹2.64 crores (Mar'25), with reserves turning negative at ₹-2.18 crores.
  • Valuation Dislocation: Trading at 3.19x book value despite negative ROE creates substantial downside risk as market reprices to distressed levels.

Outlook: Monitoring Points for the Brave

Positive Catalysts (Highly Unlikely)

  • Revenue Stabilisation: Any quarter showing sequential revenue growth above ₹1.00 crore would signal potential bottoming, though current trajectory suggests further declines.
  • Margin Improvement: Operating margin returning to breakeven or better would indicate cost restructuring success, requiring dramatic operational changes.
  • Major Contract Win: Announcement of significant new customer contract could provide revenue visibility and stabilisation catalyst.
  • Strategic Investment: Entry of strategic or financial investor with turnaround expertise could provide capital and management bandwidth for restructuring.

Red Flags (High Probability)

  • Further Revenue Decline: Q3 FY26 sales falling below ₹0.50 crores would confirm accelerating business collapse and potential terminal decline.
  • Cash Burn Acceleration: Negative operating cash flow exceeding ₹0.50 crores per quarter would threaten the company's cash cushion and force capital raising.
  • Additional Promoter Selling: Further reduction in promoter stake below 60% would signal complete loss of confidence and potential abandonment.
  • Equity Capital Impairment: Shareholder funds falling below ₹2.00 crores would raise going concern questions and potential delisting risk.
  • Continued Institutional Absence: Failure to attract any institutional investors over next 2-3 quarters would confirm investment case remains fundamentally broken.

The forward outlook for Iykot Hitech Toolroom is exceptionally challenging. The company faces an existential crisis requiring immediate and dramatic action to stabilise operations, stem cash burn, and rebuild customer relationships. Without visible signs of revenue stabilisation, margin improvement, or strategic intervention, the current trajectory points towards continued value destruction and potential terminal decline. The Q3 FY26 results will be critical—any further deterioration would likely trigger additional selling pressure and potential breach of the ₹10.20 support level.

Management's ability to articulate and execute a credible turnaround plan will determine whether the company can survive in its current form or requires more dramatic restructuring. The recent promoter stake reduction during the crisis period raises questions about their commitment to funding ongoing losses. With accumulated losses consuming equity capital and negative cash flow from operations, the company's financial cushion is finite. Investors should monitor quarterly cash burn rates closely, as acceleration beyond current levels could force dilutive capital raising or strategic sale at distressed valuations.

The Verdict: Exit Recommended

STRONG SELL

Score: 17/100

For Fresh Investors: Avoid entirely. The combination of collapsing revenues (down 64.53% YoY), catastrophic operating margins (-63.93%), persistent losses, and promoter stake reduction during crisis creates an exceptionally unfavourable risk-reward equation. This is a value destruction story, not a turnaround opportunity.

For Existing Holders: Strongly consider exiting at current levels before further deterioration. The stock trades at 3.19x book value despite negative ROE, creating substantial downside risk as the market reprices towards distressed asset valuations. Any bounce should be used as exit opportunity. The technical trend is bearish, fundamentals are deteriorating, and there are no visible positive catalysts on the horizon.

Fair Value Estimate: ₹4.50-6.00 (52.30%-64.26% downside) – Based on distressed asset valuation of 1.5-2.0x eroded book value, reflecting systematic value destruction and absence of profitable operations. Current valuation of 3.19x book appears completely unjustified given operational reality.

Note– ROCE = (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)

⚠️ Investment Disclaimer

This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investing in micro-cap stocks carries substantial risks including liquidity risk, volatility, and potential total loss of capital.

{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News