Jindal Hotels Q2 FY26: Profit Turns to Loss as Seasonal Weakness and High Debt Burden Weigh

Nov 12 2025 09:33 AM IST
share
Share Via
Jindal Hotels Ltd., operator of the Grand Mercure Vadodara Surya Palace, reported a net loss of ₹0.06 crores in Q2 FY26, a stark reversal from the ₹1.43 crore loss in the same quarter last year but deteriorating sequentially from a loss of ₹0.29 crores in Q1 FY26. The Vadodara-based hospitality company, with a market capitalisation of ₹54.09 crores, continues to grapple with seasonal demand fluctuations and a heavy debt burden that erodes profitability despite modest revenue growth.



The stock has faced significant headwinds, trading at ₹77.27 as of November 12, 2025, down 20.34% over the past year and underperforming the broader Hotels & Resorts sector by 16.37 percentage points. With the company currently in a bearish technical trend and operating margins under pressure, investors are questioning whether the turnaround story has lost momentum.





Net Loss (Q2 FY26)

₹0.06 Cr

Loss narrowed 95.80% YoY



Revenue (Q2 FY26)

₹9.56 Cr

+7.30% YoY



Operating Margin

20.19%

+10.43 ppt YoY



PAT Margin

-0.63%

Improved from -16.05% YoY




The quarter's results highlight a persistent challenge for Jindal Hotels: whilst operational efficiency has improved markedly year-on-year, the company's profitability remains hostage to elevated interest costs of ₹1.00 crore and depreciation charges of ₹1.22 crores, which together consume the entire operating profit. The company's debt-to-equity ratio of 2.19 times remains a critical constraint, limiting financial flexibility and weighing on return ratios.















































































Quarter Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 Dec'24 Sep'24 Jun'24 Mar'24
Revenue (₹ Cr) 9.56 9.57 12.55 14.23 8.91 9.31 12.78
QoQ Change -0.10% -23.75% -11.81% +59.71% -4.30% -27.15%
YoY Change +7.30% +2.79% -1.80%
Net Profit (₹ Cr) -0.06 -0.29 0.41 2.40 -1.43 -0.23 2.38
Operating Margin 20.19% 21.11% 15.54% 23.12% 9.76% 22.13% 32.94%
PAT Margin -0.63% -3.03% 3.27% 16.87% -16.05% -2.47% 18.62%



Financial Performance: Revenue Growth Fails to Translate into Profits



Jindal Hotels posted net sales of ₹9.56 crores in Q2 FY26, representing a modest 7.30% year-on-year increase from ₹8.91 crores in Q2 FY25, but remaining virtually flat sequentially at -0.10% compared to Q1 FY26's ₹9.57 crores. This stagnation underscores the seasonal nature of the hospitality business, particularly for a regional property dependent on business travel and local events.



The company's operating profit before depreciation, interest, tax, and other income (PBDIT excluding OI) stood at ₹1.93 crores, translating to an operating margin of 20.19%. This represents a significant improvement from the 9.76% margin recorded in Q2 FY25, suggesting better cost control and possibly improved pricing power. However, the margin remains well below the 32.94% achieved in Mar'24, indicating ongoing challenges in maintaining peak operational efficiency.



Employee costs of ₹2.16 crores remained stable year-on-year, accounting for 22.59% of revenues. The company's ability to manage its workforce costs amidst modest revenue growth is a positive indicator of operational discipline. However, the real profitability challenge emerges below the operating line.





Revenue (Q2 FY26)

₹9.56 Cr

QoQ: -0.10% | YoY: +7.30%



Net Loss (Q2 FY26)

₹0.06 Cr

QoQ: Deteriorated | YoY: Improved 95.80%



Operating Margin

20.19%

QoQ: -92 bps | YoY: +1,043 bps



PAT Margin

-0.63%

QoQ: Improved 240 bps | YoY: +1,542 bps




Interest costs of ₹1.00 crore consumed 10.46% of revenues in Q2 FY26, reflecting the company's substantial debt burden of ₹44.57 crores as of March 2025. Combined with depreciation charges of ₹1.22 crores, these fixed costs completely eroded the operating profit, resulting in a pre-tax loss of ₹0.19 crores. After accounting for a tax credit of ₹0.13 crores, the company reported a net loss of ₹0.06 crores.



Operational Challenges: High Leverage Strangles Profitability



The fundamental challenge facing Jindal Hotels is its capital structure. With long-term debt of ₹44.57 crores against shareholder funds of just ₹22.47 crores as of March 2025, the company operates with a debt-to-equity ratio of 2.19 times. This high leverage, whilst not uncommon in the asset-heavy hospitality sector, becomes problematic when revenue growth is modest and operating margins are under pressure.



The company's return on equity (ROE) averaged just 5.47% over recent periods, whilst return on capital employed (ROCE) stood at an even weaker 3.41%. These anaemic returns reflect the twin challenges of high debt servicing costs and insufficient operating scale to generate meaningful profits. For context, the company's average EBIT-to-interest coverage ratio of 0.59 times indicates that operating profits are insufficient to cover interest obligations—a clear sign of financial stress.




Critical Concern: Debt Servicing Strain


Debt-to-Equity: 2.19 times (High leverage)


EBIT to Interest Coverage: 0.59x (Operating profit insufficient to cover interest)


Debt to EBITDA: 3.11x (Elevated debt burden relative to cash generation)


The company's profitability remains heavily constrained by its debt burden. Until meaningful deleveraging occurs or revenues scale significantly, sustainable profitability will remain elusive.




The balance sheet shows limited financial flexibility. Current assets of ₹10.66 crores as of March 2025 provide some cushion against current liabilities of ₹12.38 crores, but the negative working capital position of approximately ₹1.72 crores suggests ongoing liquidity pressures. Fixed assets of ₹67.33 crores represent the bulk of the company's asset base, reflecting the capital-intensive nature of hotel operations.



Cash flow generation has been modest. In FY25, the company generated ₹12.00 crores from operations, but after accounting for investing activities (₹3.00 crores) and financing activities (₹7.00 crores, primarily debt repayments), net cash inflow was just ₹1.00 crore. This limited cash generation capacity constrains the company's ability to invest in property upgrades or marketing initiatives that could drive higher occupancy and room rates.



Seasonal Volatility: The Quarter-to-Quarter Rollercoaster



A striking feature of Jindal Hotels' performance is the extreme quarterly volatility in both revenues and profitability. Revenue ranged from a low of ₹8.91 crores in Sep'24 to a peak of ₹14.23 crores in Dec'24—a swing of nearly 60%. This seasonality is typical for hotels dependent on business and leisure travel, but the magnitude of the swings suggests limited success in smoothing demand through diversified revenue streams.



Profitability swings are even more dramatic. The company reported net profits of ₹2.40 crores and ₹2.38 crores in Dec'24 and Mar'24 respectively, only to plunge into losses of ₹0.29 crores and ₹0.06 crores in the subsequent quarters. This volatility makes financial planning difficult and underscores the challenge of maintaining consistent service quality and staffing levels through demand cycles.




Revenue Seasonality Pattern


Analysis of the last seven quarters reveals a clear seasonal pattern: Q3 (Oct-Dec) consistently delivers the strongest revenues (₹14.23 crores in Dec'24), likely driven by wedding season and year-end corporate events in Gujarat. Q4 (Jan-Mar) also performs well (₹12.55 crores in Mar'25), whilst Q1 and Q2 (Apr-Sep) represent the lean season with revenues in the ₹9-10 crore range.


This 40-50% revenue differential between peak and lean seasons necessitates either significant variable cost structures or acceptance of seasonal losses—a challenge Jindal Hotels has yet to fully address.













































Company Market Cap (₹ Cr) P/E (TTM) P/BV Debt/Equity
Jindal Hotels 54.09 50.35 2.44 2.19
Mac Hotels 172.96 4.19 -0.37
Gujarat Hotels 14.42
Royale Manor 28.24 1.33 0.03



Peer Comparison: Valuation Appears Reasonable, But Quality Lags



Within the Hotels & Resorts peer group, Jindal Hotels trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of 50.35 times, positioned between Gujarat Hotels (14.42x) and Mac Hotels (172.96x). Whilst this multiple appears elevated in absolute terms, it reflects the company's recent return to profitability on an annual basis and market expectations of gradual improvement.



The price-to-book ratio of 2.44 times suggests the market is valuing the company at a premium to its net asset value of ₹32.10 per share. This premium is justified by the operational value of the Grand Mercure property, but remains modest compared to Mac Hotels' 4.19x P/BV multiple. The key differentiator is financial health: Jindal Hotels' debt-to-equity ratio of 2.19 times stands in stark contrast to Royale Manor's near-zero leverage of 0.03 times.



Return on equity provides another lens for comparison. Jindal Hotels' ROE of 5.47% lags behind Mac Hotels' 6.88% but exceeds Royale Manor's 4.32%. However, all these returns are below what equity investors typically expect from hospitality investments, reflecting sector-wide challenges in generating adequate returns on capital in the micro-cap hotel space.



Valuation Analysis: Attractive Entry Point or Value Trap?



At the current price of ₹77.27, Jindal Hotels trades near its 52-week low of ₹77.26, having declined 29.75% from its 52-week high of ₹110.00. The company's valuation grade of "Attractive" suggests the stock offers reasonable value at current levels, particularly for investors with a multi-year horizon and tolerance for volatility.



The enterprise value-to-EBITDA multiple of 12.81 times appears reasonable for a stabilised hotel asset, though the EV-to-EBIT ratio of 33.60 times highlights the impact of depreciation on reported profitability. The EV-to-sales ratio of 2.30 times is in line with asset-light hospitality businesses, though Jindal Hotels' capital intensity suggests this metric may overstate relative value.





P/E Ratio (TTM)

50.35x

Sector Avg: ~72x



Price to Book

2.44x

Book Value: ₹32.10



EV/EBITDA

12.81x

Moderate for hotel asset



Dividend Yield

NA

Last dividend: 2017




The absence of dividend payments since 2017 (when the company paid ₹0.80 per share) reflects ongoing capital constraints and the need to conserve cash for debt servicing and property maintenance. Until the company achieves consistent profitability and reduces leverage, dividend resumption appears unlikely.



Historical valuation grades show significant volatility, with the stock oscillating between "Very Attractive" and "Attractive" over recent months. This fluctuation reflects both stock price movements and evolving perceptions of the company's earnings trajectory. The current "Attractive" grade suggests the market has priced in near-term challenges whilst leaving room for upside if operational improvements materialise.



Shareholding Pattern: Stable Promoter Base, Zero Institutional Interest



The shareholding structure has remained remarkably stable over the past five quarters, with promoter holding steady at 70.96%. Led by Piyush Daudayal Shah (17.13%) and family-controlled entities including Synergy Varieties Private Limited (16.13%) and Riser Holding Private Limited (9.29%), the promoter group demonstrates long-term commitment to the business. Importantly, there is zero promoter pledging, eliminating concerns about forced selling or financial stress at the promoter level.

































































Shareholder Category Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 Dec'24 QoQ Change
Promoter 70.96% 70.96% 70.96% 70.96% 0.00%
FII 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Mutual Funds 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Insurance 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Other DII 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Non-Institutional 29.04% 29.04% 29.04% 29.04% 0.00%



The complete absence of institutional investors—zero FII, mutual fund, insurance, or DII holdings—is a significant red flag. This lack of institutional participation reflects several factors: the company's micro-cap status (₹54.09 crores market capitalisation), limited liquidity (just 528 shares traded on November 12, 2025), inconsistent profitability, and high leverage. Institutional investors typically avoid such stocks due to governance concerns, liquidity constraints, and difficulty in building meaningful positions.



The 29.04% non-institutional holding represents retail investors and potentially high-net-worth individuals who may have local knowledge of the property or are betting on a turnaround. However, the complete lack of institutional validation should give potential investors pause, as it suggests the investment case has failed to convince professional money managers.



Stock Performance: Severe Underperformance Across All Timeframes



Jindal Hotels' stock performance has been dismal across nearly all meaningful timeframes. The stock has declined 20.34% over the past year, significantly underperforming the Sensex's 7.26% gain—a negative alpha of 27.60 percentage points. This underperformance has accelerated in recent months, with the stock down 17.80% over six months versus the Sensex's 2.38% gain.































































Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week -6.03% +1.11% -7.14%
1 Month -4.32% +2.29% -6.61%
3 Months -7.02% +5.18% -12.20%
6 Months -17.80% +2.38% -20.18%
Year-to-Date -21.15% +8.00% -29.15%
1 Year -20.34% +7.26% -27.60%
2 Years +45.60% +29.31% +16.29%
3 Years +67.61% +36.56% +31.05%



The technical picture is equally concerning. The stock trades below all key moving averages—5-day (₹80.45), 20-day (₹80.15), 50-day (₹82.17), 100-day (₹84.94), and 200-day (₹87.74)—indicating sustained selling pressure. The current bearish trend, which began on November 7, 2025, follows a series of trend reversals that have whipsawed investors throughout 2025.



Risk-adjusted returns paint an even bleaker picture. With a one-year volatility of 41.94%—more than three times the Sensex's 12.36%—and negative absolute returns, the stock exhibits the worst possible combination: high risk with negative returns. The risk-adjusted return of -0.48 versus the Sensex's +0.59 confirms that investors have been penalised for taking on this stock's substantial volatility.



The beta of 1.50 indicates the stock is 50% more volatile than the broader market, amplifying both gains and losses. However, given the predominantly negative price action, this high beta has worked against investors. The stock's classification as "High Beta" with "High Risk Low Return" characteristics makes it unsuitable for risk-averse investors or those seeking stable returns.




"With a debt-to-equity ratio exceeding 2x, operating profits insufficient to cover interest costs, and zero institutional participation, Jindal Hotels remains a speculative bet on operational turnaround rather than a quality investment."


Investment Thesis: Turnaround Potential Overshadowed by Structural Challenges



The investment case for Jindal Hotels rests on three pillars: improving operating margins, potential for deleveraging as cash flows improve, and attractive valuation near 52-week lows. The company has demonstrated some operational progress, with operating margins recovering from 9.76% in Sep'24 to 20.19% in Sep'25. Management's focus on cost control and possibly improved pricing power has yielded tangible results.



However, these positives are overwhelmed by structural challenges. The company's quality grade of "Below Average" reflects weak return ratios (ROE of 5.47%, ROCE of 3.41%), high leverage (debt-to-equity of 2.19 times), and insufficient interest coverage (EBIT-to-interest of 0.59 times). The financial trend is classified as "Flat," indicating no meaningful improvement in recent quarters, whilst the technical trend remains "Bearish."





Valuation

ATTRACTIVE

Near 52-week low



Quality Grade

BELOW AVERAGE

Weak fundamentals



Financial Trend

FLAT

No improvement



Technical Trend

BEARISH

Below all MAs




The company's overall Mojo score of 23 out of 100 places it firmly in "Strong Sell" territory, reflecting the confluence of weak fundamentals, deteriorating technicals, and limited near-term catalysts. Whilst the valuation appears attractive on paper, the risk of value trap is substantial given the company's inability to consistently generate profits and reduce debt.



Key Strengths & Risk Factors





✓ KEY STRENGTHS



  • Operational Improvement: Operating margins expanded from 9.76% to 20.19% year-on-year, demonstrating better cost management

  • Stable Promoter Base: 70.96% promoter holding with zero pledging indicates long-term commitment

  • Attractive Valuation: Trading near 52-week lows with valuation grade of "Attractive"

  • Established Property: Grand Mercure brand affiliation provides credibility and operational support

  • Strategic Location: Vadodara positioning captures business and leisure travel demand in Gujarat




⚠ KEY CONCERNS



  • High Leverage: Debt-to-equity of 2.19x with interest costs consuming operating profits

  • Weak Interest Coverage: EBIT-to-interest ratio of 0.59x indicates financial stress

  • Zero Institutional Holdings: Complete absence of FII/MF participation raises governance concerns

  • Extreme Seasonality: 40-50% revenue swings between quarters create profitability volatility

  • Poor Returns: ROE of 5.47% and ROCE of 3.41% well below investor expectations

  • Limited Liquidity: Micro-cap status with minimal trading volumes

  • Negative Cash Generation: Insufficient free cash flow for growth investments or meaningful deleveraging





Outlook: What to Watch





POSITIVE CATALYSTS



  • Q3 FY26 Performance: Watch for seasonal uptick in Dec'25 quarter revenues and return to profitability

  • Debt Reduction: Any material deleveraging would improve interest coverage and financial flexibility

  • Margin Sustainability: Ability to maintain 20%+ operating margins through lean season

  • Occupancy Trends: Improvement in average room rates or occupancy rates




RED FLAGS



  • Continued Losses: Inability to return to profitability in Q3/Q4 FY26 would signal deeper issues

  • Debt Refinancing Risk: Any challenges in rolling over maturing debt

  • Margin Compression: Operating margins falling below 15% would indicate pricing or cost pressures

  • Promoter Actions: Any share pledging or stake sales would be concerning

  • Technical Breakdown: Break below ₹75 support could trigger further selling





The path forward for Jindal Hotels requires executing on multiple fronts simultaneously: maintaining improved operating margins through the lean season, generating sufficient cash flows to begin debt reduction, and demonstrating consistent profitability across multiple quarters. The upcoming Q3 FY26 results (typically the strongest quarter) will be critical in assessing whether the operational improvements are sustainable or merely cyclical.



For the stock to re-rate meaningfully, the company needs to achieve three milestones: (1) four consecutive quarters of profitability, (2) reduction in debt-to-equity below 1.5 times, and (3) ROE sustainably above 10%. Until these thresholds are met, the investment remains speculative regardless of attractive valuation metrics.




The Verdict: Structural Challenges Outweigh Valuation Appeal


STRONG SELL

Score: 23/100


For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions. The combination of high leverage, weak interest coverage, extreme earnings volatility, and zero institutional participation creates an unfavourable risk-reward profile. The attractive valuation is a value trap until the company demonstrates sustained profitability and deleveraging. Better opportunities exist in the hospitality sector with stronger balance sheets and consistent cash generation.


For Existing Holders: Consider exiting on any technical bounce towards the ₹85-90 range. The stock's inability to hold gains, deteriorating technical trend, and flat financial performance suggest limited upside potential. The 70%+ promoter holding provides some downside protection, but the lack of institutional interest and high leverage create meaningful risks. Only very long-term investors with high risk tolerance and belief in eventual turnaround should maintain positions.


Fair Value Estimate: ₹65-70 (15-18% downside from current levels) based on discounted cash flow analysis assuming gradual margin improvement offset by sustained debt burden. Upside scenario of ₹95-100 requires three consecutive profitable quarters and visible deleveraging path—currently low probability.





Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)





⚠️ Investment Disclaimer


This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.





{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News