Kairosoft AI Solutions Q2 FY26: Turnaround Quarter Masks Deeper Structural Concerns

Nov 17 2025 09:31 PM IST
share
Share Via
Kairosoft AI Solutions Ltd., formerly known as Pankaj Piyush Trade & Investment Ltd., reported a net profit of ₹0.70 crores in Q2 FY26, marking a dramatic reversal from the ₹1.74 crores loss recorded in Q1 FY26. Despite this quarter-on-quarter improvement, the small-cap auto components firm continues to grapple with severe structural challenges, reflected in its 83.14% stock price decline over the past year and a market capitalisation that has shrunk to just ₹5.00 crores. Trading at ₹45.80 as of November 17, 2025, the stock remains in a bearish technical trend and carries a "Strong Sell" rating with an overall score of just 12 out of 100.





Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

₹0.70 Cr

vs ₹-1.74 Cr loss in Q1



Revenue (Q2 FY26)

₹1.23 Cr

+36.67% QoQ



Operating Margin

45.53%

vs -212.22% in Q1



Return on Equity

-12.15%

Negative profitability




The company's quarterly turnaround, whilst appearing positive on the surface, must be contextualised against a backdrop of persistent operational instability. Revenue generation has been erratic, with multiple quarters showing zero sales over the past two years. The Q2 FY26 revenue of ₹1.23 crores, though representing 36.67% sequential growth from Q1 FY26's ₹0.90 crores, remains minuscule for a listed entity and reflects the company's ongoing struggle to establish consistent business operations.



The stock's post-result performance has been particularly concerning. Trading at ₹45.80, Kairosoft AI Solutions has lost 86.11% of its value from its 52-week high of ₹329.75, whilst sitting just 8.92% above its 52-week low of ₹42.05. The shares currently trade below all major moving averages, including the 5-day (₹45.16), 20-day (₹47.53), 50-day (₹55.55), and 100-day (₹133.94) levels, signalling persistent selling pressure and lack of investor confidence.









































































Quarter Revenue (₹ Cr) QoQ Growth Net Profit (₹ Cr) Operating Margin PAT Margin
Sep'25 1.23 +36.67% 0.70 45.53% 56.91%
Jun'25 0.90 -1.74 -212.22% -193.33%
Mar'25 0.00 -100.00% -3.79
Dec'24 0.48 0.84 62.50% 175.00%
Sep'24 0.00 0.33
Jun'24 0.00 0.23
Mar'24 0.00 -4.99



Financial Performance: Erratic Revenue Generation Undermines Profitability



In Q2 FY26, Kairosoft AI Solutions posted net sales of ₹1.23 crores, representing a 36.67% increase from Q1 FY26's ₹0.90 crores. However, this sequential improvement cannot obscure the fundamental weakness in the company's revenue-generating capabilities. The quarterly revenue pattern reveals alarming inconsistency: the company reported zero sales in Mar'25, Sep'24, Jun'24, and Mar'24, interspersed with minimal revenue in quarters where sales were recorded.



Operating profit before depreciation, interest, and tax (PBDIT), excluding other income, stood at ₹0.56 crores in Q2 FY26, yielding an operating margin of 45.53%. This represents a dramatic reversal from Q1 FY26's ₹1.91 crores operating loss and -212.22% margin. The improvement, however, appears more attributable to the low revenue base and cost containment rather than genuine operational excellence. Employee costs remained stable at ₹0.31 crores in Q2 FY26, unchanged from Q1 FY26, suggesting minimal business expansion or hiring activity.



The company's reliance on other income remains a significant concern. In Q2 FY26, other income contributed ₹0.24 crores to total operating profit of ₹0.80 crores, representing 30.00% of PBDIT. This dependency on non-operating income to bolster profitability raises questions about the sustainability of core business operations. Tax expenses in Q2 FY26 were nil, reflecting the company's accumulated losses and weak profitability profile.



On a half-yearly basis (H1 FY26), the company reported combined revenue of ₹2.13 crores with a net loss of ₹1.04 crores, underscoring the fragility of the recent quarterly turnaround. The cumulative H1 FY26 performance remains deeply negative, casting doubt on the company's ability to achieve sustained profitability throughout the fiscal year.





Revenue (Q2 FY26)

₹1.23 Cr

+36.67% QoQ



Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

₹0.70 Cr

vs ₹-1.74 Cr loss QoQ



Operating Margin

45.53%

vs -212.22% QoQ



PAT Margin

56.91%

vs -193.33% QoQ




Operational Challenges: Weak ROE and Structural Instability



Kairosoft AI Solutions' operational metrics paint a concerning picture of a company struggling with fundamental business viability. The company's latest return on equity (ROE) stands at -12.15%, reflecting negative profitability and poor capital efficiency. The average ROE over recent periods is a meagre 0.48%, placing it among the weakest performers in the auto components sector and signalling chronic underutilisation of shareholder capital.



The company's balance sheet reveals limited operational scale. As of March 2025, total shareholder funds stood at ₹39.92 crores, comprising share capital of ₹3.18 crores and reserves of ₹36.73 crores. Fixed assets were minimal at ₹0.09 crores, indicating negligible manufacturing or operational infrastructure. Current assets of ₹19.71 crores were dominated by cash holdings rather than productive assets, suggesting the company is essentially holding capital without deploying it effectively in business operations.



The company operates with zero long-term debt, which on the surface appears prudent. However, in the context of near-zero fixed assets and minimal revenue generation, this debt-free status reflects not financial conservatism but rather an inability to secure financing or invest in productive capacity. Trade payables stood at ₹2.93 crores as of March 2025, a significant increase from ₹0.02 crores in March 2024, potentially indicating stretched working capital management.



The cash flow statement for FY25 reveals a net cash inflow of ₹19.00 crores from financing activities, likely related to equity issuances given the increase in share capital from ₹2.40 crores to ₹3.18 crores. However, this capital infusion has not translated into tangible business expansion or revenue growth, raising serious questions about capital allocation and management effectiveness.




Critical Red Flags


Structural Instability: The company has reported zero revenue in four of the last seven quarters, indicating fundamental business model challenges. The erratic revenue pattern, combined with a negative ROE of -12.15% and average ROE of just 0.48%, suggests the company lacks sustainable competitive advantages or viable operations in the auto components sector.




Industry Context: Severe Underperformance Against Sector



Kairosoft AI Solutions' performance stands in stark contrast to the broader auto components and equipments sector, which has delivered robust returns over the past year. Whilst the sector posted a 25.60% return over the past 12 months, Kairosoft AI Solutions plummeted 83.14%, resulting in a staggering underperformance of 108.74 percentage points. This massive divergence underscores the company-specific nature of its challenges rather than sector-wide headwinds.



The company's year-to-date (YTD) performance through November 2025 shows a decline of 71.33%, compared to the Sensex's gain of 8.72%, representing an alpha of -80.05%. Over longer timeframes, the underperformance persists: three-year returns of -56.00% versus the Sensex's +37.57%, and five-year returns of +24.97% versus the Sensex's +93.28%. The company's high beta of 1.35 indicates elevated volatility, but this volatility has translated into losses rather than gains, with a negative risk-adjusted return of -1.22 over the past year.



The auto components sector in India has benefited from strong domestic vehicle demand, export opportunities, and the shift towards electric vehicles. However, Kairosoft AI Solutions appears disconnected from these positive industry dynamics, suggesting either a lack of relevant product offerings, weak customer relationships, or operational inefficiencies that prevent it from capitalising on sector growth.



Peer Comparison: Bottom Quartile Performance



A comparison with peer companies in the auto components sector highlights Kairosoft AI Solutions' weak competitive position. The company's ROE of 0.48% lags significantly behind peers such as Jainex Aamcol (12.63%), G S Auto International (2.60%), and Rasandik Engineering (1.64%). Even loss-making peer Sibar Auto Parts maintains a higher ROE of 0.31%, whilst Amforge Industries reports 0.00% ROE, indicating break-even operations.


























































Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE (%) Debt/Equity
Kairosoft AI Solutions NA (Loss Making) 0.14 0.48 0.00
G S Auto International 26.82 2.03 2.60 1.06
Rasandik Engineering 25.85 0.50 1.64 0.26
Jainex Aamcol 43.87 4.47 12.63 1.28
Sibar Auto Parts NA (Loss Making) 1.71 0.31 0.06
Amforge Industries 31.55 0.98 0.00 0.02



The company's price-to-book value ratio of 0.14x is the lowest among peers, reflecting the market's severe scepticism about the company's ability to generate returns on its book value. Whilst this might superficially suggest undervaluation, the combination of negative current ROE (-12.15%), minimal revenue generation, and persistent losses indicates the low valuation is justified by poor fundamentals rather than representing a bargain opportunity.



With a market capitalisation of just ₹5.00 crores, Kairosoft AI Solutions ranks last among its peer group, reflecting its minimal scale and operational footprint. The company's zero institutional holdings (0.0% from FIIs, mutual funds, and insurance companies) further underscore the lack of professional investor confidence in its prospects.



Valuation Analysis: Distressed Pricing Reflects Fundamental Weakness



Kairosoft AI Solutions trades at a price-to-book value of 0.14x, representing a substantial discount to its book value of ₹320.54 per share. However, this deep discount must be interpreted in the context of the company's inability to generate sustainable profits or returns on its equity base. The company's valuation grade has fluctuated between "Risky," "Expensive," and "Very Attractive" over recent months, reflecting extreme volatility and market uncertainty about its prospects.



The company's EV/EBITDA multiple of 2.23x and EV/EBIT multiple of 2.14x appear superficially low. However, these metrics are distorted by the company's minimal and erratic earnings base. The negative EV/Sales ratio of -4.63x and negative EV/Capital Employed ratio of -0.59x reflect the market's deep pessimism about the company's ability to generate value from its assets.



With no dividend yield and a "NA" P/E ratio due to loss-making status, traditional valuation frameworks offer limited guidance. The company's five-year sales growth of -18.97% and five-year EBIT growth of -236.62% indicate a business in structural decline rather than temporary difficulty. Fair value estimation is challenging given the lack of consistent earnings and questionable business sustainability.





P/E Ratio (TTM)

NA

Loss Making



Price to Book Value

0.14x

Deep discount to book



Dividend Yield

NA

No dividends



Overall Score

12/100

Strong Sell




Shareholding: Promoter Reduction Signals Lack of Conviction



The shareholding pattern reveals concerning trends that amplify doubts about the company's prospects. Promoter holding stood at 5.07% as of September 2025, having declined from 15.00% in December 2024 and September 2024. The sharp 9.93 percentage point reduction in promoter stake between December 2024 and March 2025 suggests a significant loss of confidence from the company's founding shareholders.

























































Quarter Promoter % QoQ Change FII % MF % Non-Institutional %
Sep'25 5.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 94.93
Mar'25 5.07 -9.93 0.00 0.00 94.93
Dec'24 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 85.00
Sep'24 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 85.00
Jun'24 15.00 0.00 0.00 85.00



The current promoter holding of just 5.07%, held entirely by Vinod Kumar Bansal, is exceptionally low for an Indian listed company and raises governance concerns. The absence of any institutional investors—zero holdings from foreign institutional investors, mutual funds, insurance companies, and other domestic institutional investors—reflects a complete lack of professional investor interest. The 94.93% non-institutional holding suggests the shareholder base consists primarily of retail investors, potentially lacking the resources or expertise to effectively monitor management.



Whilst there is no promoter pledging, which eliminates one risk factor, the minimal promoter stake and complete absence of institutional investors represent significant red flags. This ownership structure suggests limited accountability and raises questions about the company's corporate governance standards and strategic direction.



Stock Performance: Severe Wealth Destruction Across All Timeframes



Kairosoft AI Solutions has delivered catastrophic returns across virtually all timeframes, representing severe wealth destruction for investors. The stock's one-year return of -83.14% compares dismally to the Sensex's +9.50% gain, resulting in an alpha of -92.64 percentage points. The three-month decline of -69.88% versus the Sensex's +5.40% gain highlights accelerating downward momentum.

























































Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week -1.31% +1.69% -3.00%
1 Month -8.36% +1.19% -9.55%
3 Months -69.88% +5.40% -75.28%
YTD -71.33% +8.72% -80.05%
1 Year -83.14% +9.50% -92.64%
2 Years -56.63% +29.12% -85.75%
3 Years -56.00% +37.57% -93.57%



The stock currently trades below all key moving averages, with the current price of ₹45.80 sitting 86.11% below the 52-week high of ₹329.75. Technical indicators uniformly signal bearish momentum: MACD shows mildly bullish on weekly but bearish on monthly timeframes, RSI indicates bullish divergence on weekly charts, and Bollinger Bands suggest continued downward pressure. The overall technical trend has been bearish since August 11, 2025, when it changed from "Does Not Qualify" at ₹167.80.



Delivery volumes have shown some increase, with the one-day delivery ratio at 88.37% versus a five-day average of 91.75%, suggesting genuine investor interest rather than speculative trading. However, this delivery-based buying has not arrested the stock's decline, indicating investors are catching a falling knife rather than accumulating a turnaround story.



Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags Outweigh Single-Quarter Recovery



The investment thesis for Kairosoft AI Solutions is overwhelmingly negative, with the company's proprietary score of 12 out of 100 reflecting fundamental, technical, and qualitative weaknesses. The rating of "Strong Sell" is driven by multiple factors: bearish technical trend, flat financial performance in recent quarters despite the Q2 improvement, weak long-term fundamental strength with an average ROE of 0.48%, and complete absence of institutional investor confidence.



The company's quality grade of "Below Average" reflects its poor long-term financial performance, including five-year sales growth of -18.97% and five-year EBIT growth of -236.62%. The financial trend is classified as "Flat" despite the Q2 FY26 recovery, as one profitable quarter does not establish a sustainable positive trajectory. The valuation assessment of "Risky" acknowledges that whilst the stock trades at 0.14x book value, this discount is justified by structural challenges rather than representing an opportunity.





Valuation

RISKY

0.14x P/BV



Quality Grade

BELOW AVG

Weak fundamentals



Financial Trend

FLAT

No clear direction



Technical Trend

BEARISH

Since Aug'25




Key Strengths & Risk Factors





KEY STRENGTHS



  • Debt-Free Balance Sheet: Zero long-term debt eliminates financial risk and interest burden, providing flexibility in challenging times.

  • Q2 FY26 Turnaround: Achieved profitability of ₹0.70 crores after previous quarter's loss, demonstrating potential for operational recovery.

  • Strong Operating Margins: Q2 FY26 operating margin of 45.53% suggests ability to control costs when revenue materialises.

  • Cash Holdings: Current assets of ₹19.71 crores as of March 2025 provide liquidity cushion for operations.

  • No Promoter Pledging: Absence of pledged shares eliminates risk of forced selling or loss of control.




KEY CONCERNS



  • Erratic Revenue Generation: Zero sales in four of last seven quarters indicates fundamental business model instability.

  • Negative ROE: Latest ROE of -12.15% and average of 0.48% reflects chronic capital inefficiency and value destruction.

  • Severe Stock Decline: 83.14% drop over past year and 86.11% below 52-week high reflects collapsed investor confidence.

  • Low Promoter Stake: Just 5.07% promoter holding raises governance concerns and signals lack of insider conviction.

  • Zero Institutional Interest: Complete absence of FII, MF, and insurance holdings indicates professional investors avoid the stock.

  • Minimal Scale: Market cap of just ₹5.00 crores and quarterly revenues under ₹2 crores limit operational viability.

  • Structural Decline: Five-year sales growth of -18.97% and EBIT growth of -236.62% indicate deteriorating fundamentals.





Outlook: What to Watch





POSITIVE CATALYSTS



  • Consistent revenue generation across multiple consecutive quarters above ₹2-3 crores

  • Sustained profitability with ROE improving above 10% for at least two consecutive quarters

  • Institutional investor entry (FII or mutual fund holdings above 5%)

  • Increase in promoter stake back above 20% demonstrating insider confidence

  • Clear business strategy articulation and product portfolio expansion




RED FLAGS



  • Return to zero or negative revenue in upcoming quarters

  • Further reduction in promoter stake below current 5.07% level

  • Continued absence of institutional investor interest beyond next two quarters

  • Stock breaking below ₹42.05 (52-week low) on sustained basis

  • Inability to provide clear business model explanation or future roadmap






"One profitable quarter does not make a turnaround—Kairosoft AI Solutions must demonstrate consistent revenue generation and sustainable profitability before investors should reconsider this deeply troubled small-cap."


The path forward for Kairosoft AI Solutions requires fundamental business transformation rather than incremental improvement. The company must establish consistent revenue streams, deploy its cash holdings productively, and rebuild investor confidence through transparent communication and demonstrated operational competence. Until these structural changes materialise, the stock remains a high-risk proposition suitable only for the most aggressive speculators willing to accept potential total loss of capital.




The Verdict: Avoid This Structurally Challenged Small-Cap


STRONG SELL

Score: 12/100


For Fresh Investors: Completely avoid this stock. The combination of erratic revenue generation, negative ROE, minimal promoter stake, zero institutional holdings, and severe stock price decline indicates fundamental business model failure. The Q2 FY26 profit of ₹0.70 crores represents a single data point that does not overcome years of structural decline. The stock trades at ₹45.80 with minimal downside protection given its proximity to the 52-week low of ₹42.05.


For Existing Holders: Exit positions at current levels or on any technical bounce towards ₹50-55. The 83.14% decline over the past year reflects genuine fundamental deterioration rather than temporary setback. With promoter stake at just 5.07% and zero institutional interest, there is no credible base of informed investors supporting the stock. The probability of further downside exceeds the probability of sustainable recovery.


Risk Assessment: EXTREME RISK - The company exhibits multiple characteristics of potential business failure: inconsistent operations, minimal scale, collapsing shareholder base, and structural profitability challenges. Investors face high probability of permanent capital loss.





Note— ROCE = (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)





⚠️ Investment Disclaimer


This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investments in small-cap stocks carry substantial risks including potential loss of entire capital.





{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News