Kalyani Forge Q3 FY26: Margin Recovery Overshadowed by Profitability Concerns

The quarter's results present a paradox that encapsulates the challenges facing this Pune-based engineering and manufacturing firm. While operating margins reached their highest level in eight quarters at 15.14%, exceptional tax charges of ₹4.07 crores—representing an extraordinary 103.04% tax rate—completely eroded profitability and pushed the company into negative territory. This tax anomaly, combined with rising interest costs and ongoing competitive pressures in the forgings sector, has raised serious questions about the company's near-term earnings trajectory.

Following the results announcement, Kalyani Forge shares have continued their bearish trend, trading at ₹600.10 as of February 12, 2026, significantly below the 52-week high of ₹890.00 reached earlier. The stock has underperformed its sector dramatically, posting a 1.27% decline over the past year whilst the broader Castings & Forgings sector surged 26.76%, resulting in a staggering 28.03 percentage point underperformance.

Financial Performance: Operational Gains Neutralised by Tax Burden

Kalyani Forge's Q3 FY26 financial performance reveals a company making operational progress that was entirely undermined by exceptional charges. Net sales for the quarter stood at ₹57.86 crores, representing a modest 3.93% sequential improvement from Q2 FY26's ₹55.67 crores, though remaining 1.30% below the year-ago quarter's ₹58.62 crores. The revenue trajectory shows persistent volatility, with the company struggling to establish consistent top-line momentum in a competitive manufacturing environment.

The standout positive from the quarter was the significant margin expansion. Operating profit before depreciation, interest, and tax (excluding other income) surged to ₹8.76 crores, yielding an operating margin of 15.14%—the highest level recorded in the past eight quarters and a substantial improvement from Q2 FY26's 11.77% and Q3 FY25's 10.35%. This 343 basis point year-on-year margin expansion suggests improved operational efficiency, better product mix, or enhanced cost management, particularly noteworthy given the challenging demand environment.

However, the bottom line tells a dramatically different story. Profit before tax for Q3 FY26 stood at ₹3.95 crores, representing a healthy 74.01% sequential increase from Q2's ₹2.27 crores and a 41.58% improvement over Q3 FY25's ₹2.79 crores. Yet the company's net profit collapsed to a loss of ₹0.12 crores due to an extraordinary tax charge of ₹4.07 crores, translating to an inexplicable 103.04% effective tax rate for the quarter. This compares starkly with the 5.29% tax rate in Q2 FY26 and 34.77% in Q3 FY25, suggesting either significant deferred tax adjustments, disallowed expenses, or other exceptional tax-related items that warrant careful scrutiny from investors.

Interest costs continued their upward trajectory, reaching ₹2.71 crores in Q3 FY26—the highest quarterly level in the dataset—up from ₹2.43 crores in Q2 FY26 and ₹1.96 crores in Q3 FY25. This 38.27% year-on-year increase in interest expenses reflects the company's elevated debt levels and rising borrowing costs, though the improved operating profit resulted in a stronger interest coverage ratio of 3.23 times, the best in recent quarters. Depreciation remained relatively stable at ₹2.46 crores, marginally higher than the previous quarter's ₹2.41 crores.

Operational Challenges: Weak Returns Despite Margin Improvements

Beneath the quarterly volatility lies a more concerning structural picture regarding Kalyani Forge's capital efficiency and profitability. The company's average Return on Equity (ROE) stands at just 5.67%, significantly below industry standards and indicative of weak shareholder value creation. This modest ROE reflects the company's struggle to generate adequate profits relative to the capital employed, a fundamental concern for any manufacturing business operating in a capital-intensive sector. The latest ROE of 8.27%, whilst showing some improvement, remains far below the double-digit returns typically expected from well-managed industrial companies.

Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) paints an equally challenging picture at an average of 4.22%, though the latest figure of 9.10% suggests some operational progress. These weak return metrics underscore the fundamental challenge facing Kalyani Forge: despite improving operating margins, the company has struggled to translate operational efficiency into attractive returns on invested capital. The low ROCE is particularly concerning given the company's debt burden, as it suggests the business may be destroying value when the cost of capital is factored in.

The company's balance sheet reveals mixed signals. Shareholder funds stood at ₹89.69 crores as of March 2025, up from ₹82.01 crores a year earlier, reflecting retained earnings accumulation. However, long-term debt declined to ₹12.25 crores from ₹19.43 crores, suggesting some deleveraging progress. Current liabilities surged to ₹120.57 crores from ₹95.58 crores, primarily driven by increased trade payables of ₹51.07 crores (up from ₹45.58 crores), indicating extended working capital cycles or supplier credit reliance. The company's average debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 2.94 times and net debt-to-equity of 0.95 times indicate moderate leverage, though the rising interest burden suggests limited financial headroom.

Cash flow generation provides one bright spot in an otherwise challenging operational picture. For FY25, Kalyani Forge generated ₹21.00 crores in operating cash flow, more than double the ₹10.00 crores generated in FY24, demonstrating improved working capital management. However, capital expenditure remained elevated at ₹24.00 crores, resulting in negative free cash flow. The company's investing cash outflow has consistently exceeded operating cash generation, necessitating external financing and contributing to the rising debt burden.

Sector Dynamics: Underperformance in a Buoyant Industry

Kalyani Forge's struggles stand in stark contrast to the broader performance of India's castings and forgings sector, which has benefited from robust automotive demand, infrastructure investment, and manufacturing sector growth. The sector delivered a stellar 26.76% return over the past year, whilst Kalyani Forge declined 1.27%, resulting in a massive 28.03 percentage point underperformance. This divergence suggests company-specific challenges rather than sector-wide headwinds, raising questions about competitive positioning, operational execution, and strategic direction.

The company's long-term growth metrics present a mixed picture. Whilst net sales have grown at an 11.39% compound annual rate over five years—respectable for a manufacturing business—EBIT growth of 26.80% over the same period suggests improving operational leverage. However, this growth has not translated into consistent profitability, with the company reporting losses in FY21 and FY23, and barely breaking even in FY23. The volatility in earnings, combined with weak return metrics, has clearly weighed on investor sentiment and valuation multiples.

The manufacturing sector backdrop remains supportive, with government initiatives like Production Linked Incentive schemes and infrastructure development driving demand for forgings and castings. However, Kalyani Forge's inability to capitalise on these tailwinds—evidenced by flat revenue growth in FY25 and marginal YoY decline in Q3 FY26—suggests execution challenges, client concentration risks, or competitive pressures that are preventing the company from participating fully in sector growth.

Peer Comparison: Valuation Discount Reflects Quality Concerns

When benchmarked against sector peers, Kalyani Forge trades at a significant quality and valuation discount that appears justified by fundamentals. The company's P/E ratio of 28.65 times sits in the middle of the peer range, though notably below the industry average of 24 times (which appears anomalous given individual peer multiples). More tellingly, Kalyani Forge's ROE of 5.67% lags dramatically behind peers like ANB Metal (40.10%) and Tirupati Forge (16.94%), explaining much of the valuation differential.

The company's Price-to-Book ratio of 2.37 times trades at a discount to most peers, with ANB Metal, Tirupati Forge, and Munish Forge commanding P/BV multiples above 4.0 times. This valuation gap reflects investor recognition of Kalyani Forge's inferior return profile and earnings volatility. The company's debt-to-equity ratio of 0.95 times sits in the middle of the peer group, neither a particular strength nor weakness, though the rising interest burden remains a concern.

Kalyani Forge's dividend yield of 0.67% provides minimal income support, with the company paying ₹4.00 per share as its latest dividend. The modest 23.99% dividend payout ratio suggests management retains most earnings for reinvestment, though the weak ROE raises questions about capital allocation efficiency. With zero institutional holdings from foreign institutional investors, mutual funds, or insurance companies, the stock lacks the quality stamp and liquidity support that institutional participation typically provides.

Valuation Analysis: Fair Pricing Offers Limited Upside

At the current market price of ₹600.10, Kalyani Forge trades at a P/E ratio of 28.65 times trailing twelve-month earnings, a premium to its historical average but below many sector peers. The company's Price-to-Book ratio of 2.37 times appears reasonable given the weak 5.67% ROE, though it suggests the market is pricing in some expectation of operational improvement. The EV/EBITDA multiple of 12.27 times and EV/EBIT of 18.70 times reflect moderate valuations for a micro-cap industrial company, though these metrics are elevated relative to the company's growth and return profile.

The stock's valuation grade has fluctuated between "Fair" and "Attractive" in recent months, currently sitting at "Fair" as of February 2026. This assessment appears appropriate given the company's mixed fundamentals—improving operating margins offset by weak returns, elevated debt, and earnings volatility. The PEG ratio of 1.66 times suggests the stock is neither significantly overvalued nor undervalued relative to its growth rate, though the quality of that growth remains questionable given the poor capital efficiency.

The stock's 52-week range of ₹488.15 to ₹890.00 illustrates the significant volatility that has characterised trading over the past year. At ₹600.10, the stock trades 32.57% below its 52-week high but 22.93% above its 52-week low, suggesting it has found some support after the sharp correction from peak levels. The technical picture remains decidedly negative, with the stock trading below all key moving averages (5-day, 20-day, 50-day, 100-day, and 200-day), indicating persistent selling pressure and lack of buying interest.

Shareholding Pattern: Stable Promoter Base, Zero Institutional Interest

Kalyani Forge's shareholding structure reveals a tightly held company with stable promoter ownership and complete absence of institutional investors. Promoter holding stood at 58.76% as of December 2025, virtually unchanged from 58.71% a year earlier, with marginal increases of 0.03% in Q2 FY26 and 0.02% in Q1 FY26. This stability suggests promoter confidence in the long-term business prospects, though the lack of any share buybacks or significant increases also indicates limited capital deployment opportunities or financial constraints.

The complete absence of Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs), Mutual Funds, Insurance Companies, and other Domestic Institutional Investors (DIIs) is a significant red flag. Zero institutional ownership typically indicates quality concerns, liquidity constraints, governance questions, or simply that the company has failed to attract professional investor attention. For retail investors, this lack of institutional validation should serve as a cautionary signal, as institutional research and due diligence often uncover issues that may not be immediately apparent from financial statements alone.

The non-institutional shareholding of 41.24% comprises entirely of retail and other non-institutional investors, creating a shareholder base that may be less sophisticated and more prone to emotional decision-making during periods of volatility. Importantly, there is zero promoter pledging, which removes one potential governance concern and suggests promoters are not using shares as collateral for personal borrowings—a positive factor in an otherwise challenging shareholding picture.

Stock Performance: Severe Underperformance Across All Timeframes

Kalyani Forge's stock price performance has been dismal across virtually all relevant timeframes, with the company significantly underperforming both the benchmark Sensex and its own sector. Over the past year, the stock has declined 1.27% whilst the Sensex gained 10.19%, resulting in negative alpha of 11.46 percentage points. More concerningly, the stock has underperformed its sector by 28.03 percentage points, with the Castings & Forgings sector delivering 26.76% returns over the same period.

The short-term picture is particularly concerning, with the stock declining 15.92% over three months and 18.01% over six months, significantly underperforming the Sensex in both periods. Year-to-date performance shows a 5.14% decline, worse than the Sensex's 1.51% fall. Even over the past week, the stock lost 2.77% whilst the broader market gained 0.75%, indicating persistent selling pressure without any meaningful support emerging.

Longer-term returns paint a more nuanced picture. Over three years, the stock has delivered impressive 157.00% returns, substantially outperforming the Sensex's 38.32% gain with positive alpha of 118.68 percentage points. Five-year returns are even more spectacular at 287.41% versus the Sensex's 62.84%, demonstrating that the company did create significant shareholder value during the post-pandemic recovery period. However, the recent deterioration suggests those gains may have been unsustainable or that the company has hit operational roadblocks that are proving difficult to overcome.

From a risk-adjusted perspective, the stock's profile is deeply unattractive. With a volatility of 44.66%—nearly four times the Sensex's 11.44%—and negative risk-adjusted returns over the past year, Kalyani Forge falls squarely into the "High Risk Low Return" category. The stock's adjusted beta of 1.50 indicates it is 50% more volatile than the broader market, amplifying both gains and losses. For risk-averse investors, this volatility profile combined with negative recent returns makes the stock particularly unsuitable.

Technical Analysis: Entrenched Bearish Trend with No Signs of Reversal

The technical picture for Kalyani Forge is unambiguously bearish across multiple timeframes and indicators. The stock's overall technical trend classification is "BEARISH," having deteriorated from "Mildly Bearish" on February 2, 2026, at ₹608.30. This trend classification is supported by bearish signals across virtually all major technical indicators including MACD, Bollinger Bands, KST, and Moving Averages on both weekly and monthly timeframes.

The stock currently trades below all key moving averages—a classic sign of sustained downtrend. It sits below the 5-day MA (₹607.12), 20-day MA (₹599.47), 50-day MA (₹624.74), 100-day MA (₹664.56), and 200-day MA (₹687.43), with each successive moving average creating a layer of overhead resistance. The 200-day moving average at ₹687.43 represents a particularly formidable resistance level, sitting 14.55% above current prices and indicating the stock would need to rally substantially just to return to its long-term trend.

Key support levels appear limited, with the 52-week low of ₹488.15 representing the nearest significant support zone, approximately 18.65% below current levels. The breakdown below the 20-day moving average area around ₹599.47 opens the door for further downside testing of the ₹550-570 zone. Resistance is layered, with immediate resistance at the 20-day MA, followed by the 50-day MA at ₹624.74, and major resistance at the 100-day and 200-day moving averages in the ₹660-690 range.

Delivery volume trends provide mixed signals. The one-month delivery change of 84.06% and one-day delivery change of 113.76% versus the five-day average suggest increased genuine investor interest rather than purely speculative trading. However, with average delivery volumes declining from 67.85% in the previous month to 62.63% in the trailing month, this uptick may simply reflect reduced overall trading activity rather than conviction buying. The low absolute volumes—averaging just 1,240 shares over the trailing month—underscore the liquidity constraints facing this micro-cap stock.

Investment Thesis: Quality Concerns Outweigh Valuation Appeal

Kalyani Forge's investment thesis rests on a precarious foundation where improving operational metrics clash with fundamental quality concerns and deteriorating financial trends. The company's Mojo Score of 28 out of 100 places it firmly in "STRONG SELL" territory, reflecting the confluence of negative factors across multiple dimensions. This comprehensive score incorporates valuation (rated "Attractive"), quality (rated "Average"), financial trends (rated "Negative"), and technical trends (rated "Bearish"), painting a picture of a company that may appear cheap but carries substantial risks.

The bull case for Kalyani Forge centres on operational improvements and valuation. Operating margins reached their highest level in eight quarters at 15.14%, suggesting management has made progress on efficiency and cost control. The company's five-year sales CAGR of 11.39% and EBIT growth of 26.80% demonstrate the business can grow, whilst the absence of promoter pledging and stable promoter ownership provide some governance comfort. At a P/E of 28.65 times and P/BV of 2.37 times, the stock trades at a discount to several peers, potentially offering value if operational improvements prove sustainable.

However, the bear case is considerably more compelling and multifaceted. The Q3 FY26 loss driven by exceptional tax charges raises serious questions about earnings quality and sustainability. The company's average ROE of 5.67% and ROCE of 4.22% indicate persistent capital inefficiency that has plagued the business for years. Rising interest costs, elevated debt levels (debt-to-EBITDA of 2.94 times), and negative free cash flow constrain financial flexibility. The complete absence of institutional investors signals quality concerns that professional investors have identified. Most critically, the stock's severe underperformance—down 1.27% over one year whilst the sector surged 26.76%—suggests company-specific execution challenges that show no signs of resolution.

Key Strengths & Risk Factors

Outlook: What to Monitor Closely