Kay Power & Paper Q2 FY26: Struggling Micro-Cap Paper Maker Posts Marginal Profit Amid Severe Revenue Pressure

Nov 14 2025 09:39 AM IST
share
Share Via
Kay Power & Paper Ltd., a Maharashtra-based manufacturer of MG Kraft Paper, reported a marginal net profit of ₹0.02 crores for Q2 FY26, marking a sequential improvement of 100% from Q1 FY26's ₹0.01 crores, but reflecting the company's continued struggle with profitability. With a market capitalisation of just ₹33.50 crores and a current price of ₹13.30, the micro-cap paper manufacturer faces mounting operational challenges despite posting sequential revenue growth of 7.16% to ₹7.63 crores in the September 2025 quarter.





Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

₹0.02 Cr

▲ 100.00% QoQ



Net Sales (Q2 FY26)

₹7.63 Cr

▲ 7.16% QoQ



Operating Margin

5.11%

▲ 4.13 pp QoQ



PAT Margin

0.26%

▲ 0.12 pp QoQ




The stock has been under severe pressure, declining 64.02% over the past year and trading 69.77% below its 52-week high of ₹43.99. Following the results, the company's proprietary Mojo Score stands at a dismal 14 out of 100, with a "Strong Sell" advisory reflecting concerns about deteriorating fundamentals, bearish technical trends, and negative financial momentum. The company's quality grade remains "Below Average," highlighting persistent operational challenges in an increasingly competitive paper manufacturing landscape.

























































Quarter Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25
Net Sales (₹ Cr) 7.63 7.12 12.16
QoQ Growth ▲ 7.16% ▼ 41.45%
Operating Profit (₹ Cr) 0.39 0.07 1.13
Operating Margin 5.11% 0.98% 9.29%
Net Profit (₹ Cr) 0.02 0.01 0.96
QoQ Growth ▲ 100.00% ▼ 98.96%
PAT Margin 0.26% 0.14% 7.89%



Financial Performance: Marginal Recovery Masks Deeper Structural Issues



In Q2 FY26, Kay Power & Paper Ltd. reported net sales of ₹7.63 crores, representing a sequential improvement of 7.16% from Q1 FY26's ₹7.12 crores. However, this recovery pales in comparison to the sharp 41.45% decline witnessed between Q4 FY25 and Q1 FY26, highlighting the company's inability to maintain consistent revenue momentum. The quarterly sales figure of ₹7.63 crores remains 18.4% below the previous four-quarter average, signalling persistent demand challenges in the company's core MG Kraft Paper segment.



Operating profitability showed signs of recovery, with operating profit (excluding other income) climbing to ₹0.39 crores in Q2 FY26 from a mere ₹0.07 crores in Q1 FY26. This translated into an operating margin expansion of 413 basis points to 5.11%, though still significantly below the 9.29% achieved in Q4 FY25. The improvement in operating margins suggests better cost management and possibly improved realisations, but the absolute profit levels remain concerningly low for a company with a 21,000-tonne annual capacity manufacturing facility.



Net profit for Q2 FY26 stood at ₹0.02 crores, doubling from the previous quarter's ₹0.01 crores. Whilst the 100% sequential growth appears impressive on the surface, the absolute profit figure underscores the company's struggle to generate meaningful earnings. The PAT margin improved marginally to 0.26% from 0.14%, but remains far below the 7.89% achieved in Q4 FY25. The dramatic collapse in profitability between Q4 FY25 (₹0.96 crores) and Q1 FY26 (₹0.01 crores) followed by the marginal recovery in Q2 FY26 suggests significant operational volatility and earnings instability.





Revenue (Q2 FY26)

₹7.63 Cr

▲ 7.16% QoQ



Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

₹0.02 Cr

▲ 100.00% QoQ



Operating Margin

5.11%

▲ 4.13 pp QoQ



PAT Margin

0.26%

▲ 0.12 pp QoQ




Employee costs remained relatively stable at ₹0.39 crores in Q2 FY26 compared to ₹0.36 crores in Q1 FY26, representing approximately 5.11% of net sales. Depreciation charges increased to ₹0.37 crores from ₹0.35 crores, reflecting the capital-intensive nature of paper manufacturing. Notably, the company reported zero interest costs across all three quarters, indicating minimal debt burden in its capital structure—one of the few bright spots in an otherwise challenging financial picture.




⚠️ Critical Concern: Negative Cash Flow from Operations


For FY25, Kay Power & Paper reported a negative operating cash flow of ₹3.58 crores, marking the lowest level in recent years. This cash flow deterioration, coupled with changes in working capital of ₹-6.00 crores, raises serious questions about the company's ability to fund operations organically. The company relied on financing cash flow of ₹18.00 crores during FY25, suggesting dependence on external capital to sustain operations—a red flag for long-term sustainability.




Operational Challenges: Weak Capital Efficiency Despite Strong ROE



Kay Power & Paper's operational metrics present a paradoxical picture. The company reported an impressive average return on equity (ROE) of 26.53%, significantly above industry standards and suggesting efficient use of shareholder capital. However, this metric must be viewed in context—with a minuscule equity base of ₹49.93 crores (comprising share capital of ₹22.09 crores and reserves of ₹16.97 crores), even small profit fluctuations can generate outsized ROE movements. The latest ROE of 2.16% for the most recent period reflects the company's current profitability struggles.



In stark contrast to the ROE figure, the company's return on capital employed (ROCE) tells a concerning story. The average ROCE stands at a negative 1.82%, with the latest reading at -2.59%, indicating that the company is destroying value rather than creating it. This negative ROCE, despite minimal debt levels, points to fundamental operational inefficiencies and the company's inability to generate adequate returns from its asset base of ₹41.60 crores in fixed assets.



The company's sales-to-capital-employed ratio of 1.49x suggests moderate asset turnover, but this metric alone cannot compensate for the poor profitability profile. With total shareholder funds of ₹49.93 crores supporting a plant with 21,000 tonnes annual capacity, the company appears to be operating well below optimal utilisation levels. The balance sheet shows current assets of ₹18.43 crores against current liabilities of ₹11.56 crores, providing a reasonable current ratio, but the negative operating cash flow undermines this apparent liquidity comfort.




Balance Sheet Snapshot: Low Leverage But Capital Inefficiency


Kay Power & Paper maintains a relatively clean balance sheet with long-term debt of just ₹0.84 crores, translating to a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.01—amongst the lowest in the paper manufacturing sector. However, the company's inability to generate positive returns on this capital raises questions about management's capital allocation decisions. With fixed assets of ₹41.60 crores representing 83% of total assets, the company is highly capital-intensive but struggling to monetise these investments effectively.




Industry Context: Underperforming in a Recovering Paper Sector



The paper manufacturing industry has witnessed modest recovery in recent quarters, with the broader Paper, Forest & Jute Products sector delivering a 0.81% return over the past year. Against this backdrop, Kay Power & Paper's catastrophic 64.02% decline over the same period represents a massive underperformance of 64.83 percentage points versus its sector peers. This divergence suggests company-specific challenges rather than industry-wide headwinds.



The company's 5-year sales growth of 14.19% and EBIT growth of 20.49% demonstrate historical expansion capability, but recent quarters tell a different story. The sharp revenue volatility—from ₹12.16 crores in Q4 FY25 to ₹7.12 crores in Q1 FY26—indicates either demand instability or operational disruptions affecting production and sales. For FY25, the company reported total sales of ₹40.00 crores with a PAT margin of just 2.5%, highlighting the structural profitability challenges facing the business.



Kay Power & Paper operates in the MG Kraft Paper segment, a commodity product category characterised by intense competition, price sensitivity, and thin margins. With an annual capacity of 21,000 tonnes and a captive 6 MW power plant, the company theoretically possesses the infrastructure for competitive operations. However, the inability to consistently generate positive operating cash flow and maintain stable margins suggests either pricing pressure from larger competitors or operational inefficiencies that prevent the company from achieving economies of scale.







































Metric FY25 Interpretation
Net Sales ₹40.00 Cr 14.19% CAGR over 5 years
Operating Profit ₹0.00 Cr Zero operating profit for full year
Net Profit ₹1.00 Cr Entirely driven by other income
Other Income ₹2.00 Cr Exceeded operating profit
Operating Cash Flow ₹-3.58 Cr Negative cash generation



Peer Comparison: Valuation Discount Reflects Fundamental Weakness



When benchmarked against sector peers, Kay Power & Paper trades at a P/E ratio of 29.76x—below the industry average of approximately 57x (excluding outliers). However, this apparent valuation discount is misleading given the company's weak fundamentals. The company's price-to-book value of 0.64x suggests the market values the company below its stated net asset value, reflecting scepticism about the earning power of these assets.



Kay Power & Paper's standout metric versus peers is its ROE of 26.53%, significantly higher than competitors like Pratik Panels (4.40%), Mohit Paper Mill (9.20%), and Spinaroo Comm. (11.19%). However, this high ROE must be contextualised against the company's negative ROCE and minimal absolute profit generation. The debt-to-equity ratio of 0.01 is amongst the lowest in the peer group, but this conservative capital structure has not translated into superior operational performance or shareholder returns.


























































Company P/E (TTM) ROE Debt/Equity P/BV
Kay Power & Paper 29.76 26.53% 0.01 0.64
Pratik Panels 166.70 4.40% 0.02 9.07
Mohit Paper Mill 7.18 9.20% 1.45 0.89
Spinaroo Comm. 31.91 11.19% 0.00 2.74
Astron Paper NA (Loss Making) 2.07% 0.85 0.42
Abril Paper 23.60 0.0% -0.11 3.17



With a market capitalisation of just ₹33.50 crores, Kay Power & Paper ranks at the bottom of its peer group, reflecting its micro-cap status and limited institutional following. The company's book value per share of ₹17.68 compares to a current market price of ₹13.30, representing a 24.76% discount to book value. This discount persists despite zero promoter pledging and stable promoter holding of 46.04%, suggesting the market questions the quality and realisability of the company's stated assets.



Valuation Analysis: Attractive Multiples Cannot Compensate for Weak Fundamentals



From a pure valuation perspective, Kay Power & Paper appears attractively priced. The stock trades at a P/E ratio of 29.76x against an industry P/E of 20x, though this represents a premium rather than discount—a premium that appears unjustified given the company's operational struggles. The EV-to-EBITDA multiple of 16.25x and EV-to-Sales ratio of 0.91x suggest moderate valuation levels, but these metrics lose relevance when the underlying business generates minimal cash flow and inconsistent profitability.



The company's price-to-book value of 0.64x represents the most compelling valuation metric, suggesting the market ascribes a 36% discount to the company's stated net asset value of ₹17.68 per share. However, this discount likely reflects concerns about asset quality, earning power, and the company's ability to generate returns on its ₹41.60 crores in fixed assets. With the stock trading at ₹13.30 versus a book value of ₹17.68, value investors might be tempted by the apparent margin of safety, but the negative operating cash flow and deteriorating financial trends suggest this could be a value trap.





P/E Ratio (TTM)

29.76x

vs Industry: 20x



Price to Book

0.64x

36% discount to NAV



EV/EBITDA

16.25x

Moderate levels



Dividend Yield

0.0%

No dividends




The company's valuation grade has fluctuated significantly over the past two years, moving from "Expensive" to "Attractive" to "Risky" and finally settling at "Fair" as of August 13, 2025. This volatility in valuation assessment reflects the stock's dramatic price swings—from a 52-week high of ₹43.99 to the current price of ₹13.30, representing a 69.77% decline. The dividend yield stands at zero, as the company has not paid any dividends, reinvesting (or more accurately, consuming) all available capital in operations.



Shareholding Pattern: Stable Promoter Base Provides Limited Comfort



The shareholding pattern of Kay Power & Paper has remained remarkably stable over the past five quarters, with promoter holding locked at 46.04% across all periods from September 2024 through September 2025. This stability, whilst providing some comfort regarding promoter commitment, also reflects the absence of any significant institutional interest or retail participation. The promoter group, led by the Chandra family through various entities including Chandra Trading And Investment Pvt Ltd (12.53%) and Kay Nitroxygen Pvt Ltd (12%), has maintained its stake without any material changes.


























































Shareholder Category Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 Dec'24
Promoter Holding 46.04% 46.04% 46.04% 46.04%
FII Holding 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Mutual Fund 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Insurance 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Other DII 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Non-Institutional 53.96% 53.96% 53.96% 53.96%



The complete absence of foreign institutional investors (FIIs), mutual funds, insurance companies, and other domestic institutional investors (DIIs) is particularly telling. With institutional holding at 0.0%, Kay Power & Paper remains entirely off the radar of professional money managers. This lack of institutional participation reflects the company's micro-cap status, limited liquidity (with just 3,824 shares traded on November 14), and weak fundamental profile that fails to meet institutional investment criteria.



The non-institutional holding of 53.96% comprises primarily retail investors and potentially high-net-worth individuals, but the frozen shareholding pattern suggests minimal trading activity or investor interest. Notably, there is zero promoter pledging, which eliminates one potential risk factor. However, the absence of any institutional buying despite the stock's 64% decline over the past year speaks volumes about professional investors' assessment of the company's prospects.



Stock Performance: Catastrophic Decline Reflects Fundamental Deterioration



Kay Power & Paper's stock performance has been nothing short of disastrous over the past year, with the shares plunging 64.02% compared to the Sensex's 8.50% gain—representing a staggering negative alpha of 72.52 percentage points. The stock currently trades at ₹13.30, having crashed from its 52-week high of ₹43.99, and sits just 12.71% above its 52-week low of ₹11.80. This severe underperformance versus both the broader market and the paper sector (which returned 0.81% over the year) underscores the company-specific nature of the challenges.































































Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week -5.41% +1.15% -6.56%
1 Month -10.68% +2.62% -13.30%
3 Months -13.75% +4.44% -18.19%
6 Months -3.41% +3.50% -6.91%
YTD -63.95% +7.73% -71.68%
1 Year -64.02% +8.50% -72.52%
2 Years +53.05% +29.64% +23.41%
3 Years +58.33% +36.60% +21.73%



The technical picture is equally grim, with the stock trading below all key moving averages—5-day MA (₹14.05), 20-day MA (₹14.58), 50-day MA (₹14.52), 100-day MA (₹14.83), and 200-day MA (₹17.84). The overall technical trend is classified as "Bearish," having deteriorated from "Mildly Bearish" on November 12, 2025. Technical indicators across timeframes paint a uniformly negative picture, with MACD showing bearish signals on the monthly chart, Bollinger Bands indicating bearish momentum on both weekly and monthly timeframes, and Dow Theory confirming mildly bearish trends across multiple periods.



The stock's beta of 1.50 classifies it as a high-beta security, meaning it tends to move 50% more than the broader market in either direction. However, this high volatility has worked entirely against shareholders over the past year. The risk-adjusted return stands at -1.03 with volatility of 62.02%, placing the stock firmly in the "High Risk Low Return" category—the worst possible quadrant for investors. In contrast, the Sensex delivered a risk-adjusted return of 0.69 with volatility of just 12.26%, highlighting the exceptional underperformance and risk profile of Kay Power & Paper.




"With negative operating cash flow, deteriorating margins, and a stock price that has lost nearly two-thirds of its value in twelve months, Kay Power & Paper exemplifies the risks inherent in micro-cap manufacturing stocks operating in commodity segments."


Investment Thesis: Weak Fundamentals Overwhelm Valuation Appeal



Kay Power & Paper's investment thesis presents a cautionary tale of how attractive valuation multiples can mask fundamental deterioration. The company's Mojo Score of 14 out of 100 reflects the confluence of negative factors: bearish technical trends, negative financial momentum, below-average quality, and severe underperformance versus both the market and sector peers. Whilst the valuation appears "Fair" at current levels, this assessment fails to capture the operational challenges and cash flow concerns that plague the business.





Valuation Grade

FAIR

P/BV: 0.64x



Quality Grade

BELOW AVG

Weak fundamentals



Financial Trend

NEGATIVE

Deteriorating



Technical Trend

BEARISH

Below all MAs




The near-term drivers for Kay Power & Paper are overwhelmingly negative. The quarterly financial trend classification of "Negative" reflects sales that have fallen 18.4% below the four-quarter average and operating cash flow that has turned sharply negative. The technical trend is "Bearish," with the stock trading below all major moving averages and showing no signs of stabilisation. The combination of negative financial trends and bearish technicals creates a particularly challenging environment for potential investors.



From a quality perspective, the company's "Below Average" grade reflects its weak long-term fundamental strength despite the high debt-to-equity ratio of 11.48x on an average basis (though latest figures show much lower leverage). The company has demonstrated historical growth with 5-year sales CAGR of 14.19% and EBIT growth of 20.49%, but recent performance suggests this growth trajectory has stalled or reversed. The absence of institutional holding (0.0%), combined with zero promoter pledging, presents a mixed picture—financial conservatism on one hand, but complete lack of professional investor confidence on the other.



Key Strengths & Risk Factors





✅ KEY STRENGTHS



  • Low Leverage: Debt-to-equity ratio of 0.01 with minimal interest burden

  • Stable Promoter Holding: 46.04% promoter stake with zero pledging

  • Integrated Operations: Captive 6 MW power plant reduces energy costs

  • Valuation Discount: Trading at 0.64x book value, 36% below net asset value

  • Historical Growth: 14.19% sales CAGR over 5 years demonstrates past expansion capability

  • Established Presence: Operating since 1991 with 21,000-tonne annual capacity




⚠️ KEY CONCERNS



  • Negative Cash Flow: Operating cash flow of ₹-3.58 crores in FY25 raises sustainability concerns

  • Minimal Profitability: Q2 FY26 net profit of just ₹0.02 crores despite ₹7.63 crores revenue

  • Negative ROCE: -2.59% latest ROCE indicates value destruction

  • Severe Stock Decline: Down 64.02% over past year, 69.77% below 52-week high

  • Zero Institutional Interest: No FII, MF, or insurance company participation

  • High Volatility: Beta of 1.50 with 62.02% volatility creates high-risk profile

  • Commodity Business: MG Kraft Paper is undifferentiated product facing pricing pressure





Outlook: What Lies Ahead for Kay Power & Paper



The outlook for Kay Power & Paper remains challenging in the near to medium term. The company faces the fundamental challenge of operating a capital-intensive manufacturing facility in a commodity segment whilst generating minimal profitability and negative operating cash flow. The sequential improvement from Q1 FY26 to Q2 FY26 provides a glimmer of hope, but the absolute profit levels remain far too low to justify the current market capitalisation or provide adequate returns to shareholders.





📈 POSITIVE CATALYSTS



  • Margin Stabilisation: Sustained operating margin above 5% in coming quarters

  • Revenue Consistency: Quarterly sales stabilising above ₹10 crores

  • Cash Flow Turnaround: Return to positive operating cash flow

  • Capacity Utilisation: Improvement towards optimal 21,000-tonne capacity

  • Industry Recovery: Broader paper sector demand improvement




🚩 RED FLAGS TO MONITOR



  • Further Cash Burn: Continued negative operating cash flow in subsequent quarters

  • Margin Compression: Operating margins falling below 3%

  • Revenue Volatility: Quarterly sales swings exceeding 30%

  • Debt Increase: Any significant rise in leverage to fund operations

  • Promoter Stake Reduction: Any decrease in 46.04% promoter holding

  • Technical Breakdown: Breach of ₹11.80 support (52-week low)





For the company to stage a meaningful turnaround, it must address several critical issues: achieving consistent revenue above ₹10 crores per quarter, expanding operating margins to sustainable double-digit levels, generating positive operating cash flow, and improving capacity utilisation. Without visible progress on these fronts, the stock is likely to remain under pressure despite its apparent valuation discount. The technical setup remains firmly bearish, and any recovery would require not just operational improvement but also a sustained change in investor sentiment—difficult to achieve for a micro-cap stock with zero institutional following.




The Verdict: Avoid This Micro-Cap Value Trap


STRONG SELL

Score: 14/100


For Fresh Investors: Stay away. The combination of negative operating cash flow, minimal profitability, bearish technical trends, and severe underperformance makes Kay Power & Paper unsuitable for new investment. The apparent valuation discount (0.64x book value) is a value trap, not an opportunity, given the company's inability to generate adequate returns on capital. With negative ROCE of -2.59% and operating cash flow of ₹-3.58 crores, the business is destroying rather than creating value.


For Existing Holders: Consider exiting on any technical bounce towards ₹14-15 levels. The 64.02% decline over the past year reflects fundamental deterioration that shows no signs of reversal. Whilst the Q2 FY26 results showed marginal sequential improvement, the absolute profit of ₹0.02 crores remains far too low to justify holding. The negative financial trend, bearish technical setup, and complete absence of institutional interest suggest further downside risk outweighs any potential recovery upside.


Risk Assessment: High risk, low return profile with 62.02% volatility and beta of 1.50. The stock sits just 12.71% above its 52-week low of ₹11.80, which could serve as the next downside target if operational metrics fail to improve. Only aggressive, high-risk investors with deep understanding of the paper manufacturing sector and ability to withstand significant volatility should consider this micro-cap stock, and even then, position sizing should be minimal.





Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)





⚠️ Investment Disclaimer


This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. The analysis presented is based on publicly available information as of November 19, 2025, and market conditions can change rapidly. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and all investments carry risk of loss.





{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News