Kiduja India Q2 FY26: Micro-Cap NBFC Posts ₹15.33 Crore Loss Amid Revenue Collapse

Oct 29 2025 09:18 AM IST
share
Share Via
Kiduja India Ltd., a Mumbai-based non-banking financial company, reported a catastrophic quarter ending September 2025, posting a net loss of ₹15.33 crores against a profit of ₹6.08 crores in the year-ago period. The micro-cap NBFC, with a market capitalisation of just ₹48.72 crores, witnessed its revenue plummet to zero in Q2 FY26 from ₹10.38 crores in Q2 FY25—a complete collapse that raises serious questions about business continuity. The stock has responded with brutal selling pressure, down 95.41% over the past year and trading at ₹20.30, dangerously close to its 52-week low of ₹15.50.





Net Loss (Q2 FY26)

₹15.33 Cr

↓ 352.14% YoY



Revenue (Q2 FY26)

₹0.00 Cr

↓ 100.00% YoY



Operating Profit

₹-13.14 Cr

Lowest on record



Book Value per Share

₹-9.86

Negative equity




The September quarter marks a complete operational breakdown for this 40-year-old company established in November 1985. Registered with the Reserve Bank of India as an NBFC primarily engaged in investments and dealing in shares and securities, Kiduja India's business model appears to have disintegrated entirely. The company recorded zero sales in Q2 FY26, a stark reversal from the ₹19.12 crores posted in the immediately preceding quarter (Q1 FY26), which itself represented anomalous strength.



This isn't the first time Kiduja India has reported zero revenue—the pattern repeats across multiple quarters (Mar'25, Dec'24), suggesting chronic operational instability rather than a one-off aberration. The company's shareholder funds stand deeply negative at ₹-23.66 crores as of March 2025, while current liabilities balloon to ₹77.35 crores against current assets of just ₹52.96 crores, painting a picture of severe financial distress.



Financial Performance: A Quarter of Complete Collapse



The September 2025 quarter represents the nadir of Kiduja India's financial trajectory. With zero revenue generation, the company's operating profit before depreciation, interest, and tax (PBDIT) excluding other income collapsed to ₹-13.14 crores—the worst quarterly performance in available records. This compares catastrophically to the ₹9.69 crores PBDIT posted in Q2 FY25, marking a sequential deterioration of 1,441.80% from the previous four-quarter average.





Revenue (Q2 FY26)

₹0.00 Cr

↓ 100.00% QoQ | ↓ 100.00% YoY



Net Loss (Q2 FY26)

₹-15.33 Cr

↓ 194.40% QoQ | ↓ 352.14% YoY



Operating Margin

0.00%

vs 97.65% in Q1 FY26



Interest Expense

₹2.19 Cr

↓ 9.88% QoQ




The sequential comparison reveals the shocking volatility in Kiduja India's operations. After posting a surprisingly strong Q1 FY26 with revenue of ₹19.12 crores (up 116.53% year-on-year) and net profit of ₹16.24 crores, the company's performance fell off a cliff in Q2. This wild swing from ₹16.24 crores profit to ₹15.33 crores loss in just one quarter—a 194.40% sequential decline—suggests either highly erratic deal-based revenue recognition or fundamental business model failure.



Interest expenses, whilst declining modestly to ₹2.19 crores in Q2 FY26 from ₹2.43 crores in Q1 FY26, continue to drain resources even as the company generates no revenue. With zero operating income to service debt obligations, the interest burden becomes an unsustainable fixed cost that accelerates losses. The company's profit before tax excluding other income stood at ₹-15.33 crores—the lowest on record.

































































Quarter Revenue (₹ Cr) QoQ Change Net Profit (₹ Cr) Operating Margin
Sep'25 0.00 -100.00% -15.33 0.0%
Jun'25 19.12 N/A 16.24 97.65%
Mar'25 0.00 N/A -4.09 0.0%
Dec'24 0.00 -100.00% -13.66 0.0%
Sep'24 10.38 +17.55% 6.08 93.35%
Jun'24 8.83 -13.09% 5.42 96.60%
Mar'24 10.16 N/A 6.71 96.95%



The quarterly trend table exposes the extreme volatility plaguing Kiduja India. Quarters with zero revenue alternate with brief periods of activity, creating an unpredictable earnings pattern that defies rational analysis. When the company does generate revenue, operating margins appear artificially high (93-98%), suggesting either very low cost structures during active periods or accounting treatment issues that warrant scrutiny.



Balance Sheet Distress: Negative Equity and Mounting Liabilities



Kiduja India's balance sheet reveals a company in severe financial distress, with shareholder funds deeply negative at ₹-23.66 crores as of March 2025, worsening from ₹-20.40 crores in March 2024. The company's book value per share stands at ₹-9.86, meaning equity holders face complete capital erosion. With share capital of ₹2.40 crores and reserves & surplus at ₹-26.06 crores, accumulated losses have entirely wiped out the equity base.




Critical Balance Sheet Warning


Negative Net Worth: Shareholder funds of ₹-23.66 crores indicate the company is technically insolvent on a balance sheet basis. Current liabilities of ₹77.35 crores exceed current assets of ₹52.96 crores by ₹24.39 crores, creating a severe working capital deficit. With no fixed assets, no investments, and minimal current assets, the company lacks tangible resources to support operations or meet obligations.


Debt Structure: Whilst the company carries zero long-term debt, the massive current liabilities burden (₹77.35 crores) against a market capitalisation of just ₹48.72 crores suggests creditors hold claims far exceeding the company's equity value. This imbalance typically precedes either restructuring or liquidation scenarios.




The annual financial statements reveal a company that has destroyed value consistently. For the fiscal year ending March 2025, Kiduja India posted revenue of just ₹6.00 crores (down 86.70% from ₹45.00 crores in FY24) and a net loss of ₹6.00 crores. The five-year sales growth stands at a catastrophic -86.00%, whilst EBIT growth over the same period registers at -118.44%—indicating not just revenue decline but accelerating operational losses.



Return on equity remains at 0.0%, though this metric loses meaning when equity itself is negative. The company's negative book value renders traditional valuation metrics like price-to-book (-2.29x) meaningless. With zero institutional holdings and no dividend payments, Kiduja India operates in complete isolation from professional investor interest.



Cash Flow Crisis: Erratic Patterns Signal Instability



Kiduja India's cash flow statements expose the chaotic financial management underlying the business. For FY25, the company reported operating cash flow of ₹72.87 crores—the highest on record—yet this occurred during a year when the company posted a ₹6.00 crore loss. This counterintuitive relationship suggests significant working capital adjustments (₹67.00 crores in changes) rather than genuine operational cash generation.



The cash flow from financing activities shows equally erratic patterns: ₹-72.00 crores in FY25 (outflow), ₹56.00 crores in FY24 (inflow), ₹-84.00 crores in FY23 (outflow), and ₹112.00 crores in FY22 (inflow). These wild swings suggest the company repeatedly taps external financing to plug operational gaps, then repays when occasional revenue materialises—a financially unsustainable cycle that cannot continue indefinitely.




Working Capital Volatility


The ₹67.00 crores positive working capital change in FY25 likely reflects collection of receivables or reduction in current assets rather than operational improvement. With current assets declining from ₹121.14 crores in March 2024 to ₹52.96 crores in March 2025, the company appears to be liquidating positions to generate cash—a pattern that cannot sustain ongoing operations.




Peer Comparison: Bottom of the Barrel Performance



When benchmarked against NBFC sector peers, Kiduja India's metrics place it at the absolute bottom of the quality spectrum. With zero return on equity (versus peer average of approximately 10-12%), negative book value, and loss-making operations, the company fails every comparative metric.


























































Company P/E (TTM) ROE (%) P/BV (x) Debt/Equity
Kiduja India NA (Loss Making) 0.00% -2.29 -3.20
Bridge Securities 31.28 31.70% 18.03 0.00
Gowra Leasing 8.82 6.72% 0.14 0.07
AD Manum Finance 4.67 8.17% 0.64 0.10
Ajcon Global 125.99 5.81% 2.15 0.43
Futuristic Solutions NA (Loss Making) 0.00% 3.30 0.03



Kiduja India's market capitalisation of ₹48.72 crores ranks it sixth and last among this peer group. Even Futuristic Solutions, the only other loss-making peer, maintains positive book value (P/BV of 3.30x versus Kiduja's -2.29x). The negative debt-to-equity ratio of -3.20 for Kiduja reflects the negative equity base rather than any financial strength.



The NBFC sector has delivered 17.71% returns over the past year, whilst Kiduja India has destroyed 95.41% of shareholder value—an underperformance of 113.12 percentage points. This massive divergence underscores that Kiduja's problems are company-specific rather than sector-related.



Valuation Analysis: Meaningless Metrics for a Distressed Asset



Traditional valuation frameworks collapse when applied to Kiduja India. With a loss-making P/E ratio, negative book value (P/BV of -2.29x), and negative enterprise value metrics (EV/EBITDA of -20.73x), the company defies conventional analysis. The current market price of ₹20.30 represents a 96.06% decline from the 52-week high of ₹515.05, though that peak likely reflected speculative frenzy rather than fundamental value.



The company's valuation grade oscillates between "Risky" and "Very Attractive" with alarming frequency—changing five times in the past six weeks alone (most recently to "Risky" on October 15, 2025). These rapid grade changes reflect the extreme price volatility (105.08% annual volatility) rather than any fundamental improvement. At ₹20.30, the stock trades just 30.97% above its 52-week low of ₹15.50, with minimal downside cushion remaining.





P/E Ratio (TTM)

NA

Loss Making



Price to Book

-2.29x

Negative equity



EV/EBITDA

-20.73x

Negative EBITDA



Dividend Yield

NA

No dividends




The enterprise value to sales ratio of 20.56x appears astronomically high, but this metric too loses meaning when sales alternate between zero and sporadic activity. For a company with negative equity, mounting liabilities, and no visible path to profitability, any positive valuation represents speculative hope rather than discounted cash flow reality.



Shareholding Pattern: Promoter Control Amidst Retail Exodus



Promoters maintain a steady 75.00% stake in Kiduja India, unchanged across the past five quarters, with the remaining 25.00% held by non-institutional investors (retail shareholders). Notably, there is zero institutional participation—no foreign institutional investors, no mutual funds, no insurance companies, and no domestic institutional investors hold positions in the stock.

































































Shareholding Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 Dec'24 Sep'24
Promoter 75.00% 75.00% 75.00% 75.00% 75.00%
FII 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Mutual Funds 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Insurance 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Other DII 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Non-Institutional 25.00% 25.00% 25.00% 25.00% 25.00%



The complete absence of institutional investors speaks volumes about the company's credibility and prospects. Professional fund managers, who conduct rigorous due diligence, have stayed entirely away from this stock. The promoter group, led by Ashish Jaipuria (55% stake) along with family members Kushal Ashish Jaipuria and Ujjval Ashish Jaipuria (10% each), maintains control but has not pledged shares—perhaps because lenders wouldn't accept them as collateral given the negative equity position.



The stable 25% retail holding suggests a trapped shareholder base unable to exit without accepting massive losses. With average daily volumes of just 12,497 shares and a stock price down 95% from highs, retail investors face severe liquidity constraints even if they wish to exit positions.



Stock Performance: Catastrophic Wealth Destruction



Kiduja India's stock performance ranks amongst the worst in the Indian equity market over the past year. The shares have collapsed 95.41% over twelve months, destroying virtually all shareholder wealth. On October 29, 2025, the stock fell another 9.90% to ₹20.30, extending the relentless downtrend that has persisted throughout 2025.





































































Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Day -9.90% +0.24% -10.14%
1 Week -5.14% +0.48% -5.62%
1 Month +6.06% +5.56% +0.50%
3 Months -23.86% +4.30% -28.16%
6 Months -0.64% +5.66% -6.30%
YTD -95.34% +8.57% -103.91%
1 Year -95.41% +5.56% -100.97%
2 Years -77.06% +33.00% -110.06%
3 Years -73.01% +41.48% -114.49%



The year-to-date performance shows a catastrophic 95.34% decline, underperforming the Sensex by 103.91 percentage points. Even the modest one-month gain of 6.06% (barely outperforming the Sensex by 0.50%) likely represents a technical bounce from oversold levels rather than any fundamental improvement. The stock trades below all key moving averages—5-day (₹21.91), 20-day (₹20.92), 50-day (₹22.48), 100-day (₹22.88), and 200-day (₹58.27)—confirming the entrenched bearish trend.



With beta of 1.50, Kiduja India exhibits higher volatility than the broader market, amplifying losses during downtrends. The risk-adjusted return of -0.91 over one year, combined with volatility of 105.08%, places the stock firmly in "HIGH RISK LOW RETURN" territory—the worst possible quadrant for investors. The Sharpe ratio remains negative, indicating investors receive no compensation for the extreme risk undertaken.




"With negative equity, zero revenue generation, and 95% wealth destruction over twelve months, Kiduja India exemplifies a value trap where low absolute prices mask complete fundamental deterioration."


Technical Analysis: Deeply Entrenched Bearish Trend



Technical indicators unanimously signal distress. The overall technical trend stands at "MILDLY BEARISH" as of October 28, 2025, though this represents a marginal improvement from "BEARISH" the previous day. However, this classification understates the severity—the stock has fallen 96% from its 52-week high, a decline that transcends normal technical categorisations.



Weekly MACD shows "Mildly Bullish" signals, whilst monthly MACD remains "Bearish"—a divergence that typically indicates short-term oversold bounces within a longer-term downtrend. Bollinger Bands signal "Mildly Bearish" on both weekly and monthly timeframes, whilst the KST indicator flashes "Bearish" across both periods. Dow Theory shows "No Trend" weekly but "Mildly Bearish" monthly, reflecting the choppy, low-liquidity trading environment.



Immediate support lies at ₹15.50 (the 52-week low), just 23.65% below current levels—minimal cushion for further downside. Resistance emerges at ₹20.92 (20-day moving average), ₹22.88 (100-day moving average), and ₹58.27 (200-day moving average). The 52-week high of ₹515.05 sits 2,438% above current prices—a chasm that would require miraculous fundamental transformation to bridge.



Investment Thesis: A Company in Terminal Decline



Kiduja India's investment thesis has completely collapsed. The company's proprietary Mojo Score stands at just 9 out of 100, with a "STRONG SELL" advisory rating. The score breakdown reveals failure across all dimensions: "NEGATIVE" near-term drivers (combining negative quarterly financial trend with mildly bearish technicals), "BELOW AVERAGE" quality assessment, "RISKY" valuation classification, and an overall "CAUTIOUS" assessment.





Mojo Score

9/100

Strong Sell



Financial Trend

Negative

Q2 FY26



Technical Trend

Mildly Bearish

All MAs broken



Quality Grade

Below Average

Zero ROE




The quality assessment categorises Kiduja India as "BELOW AVERAGE" based on long-term financial performance. With five-year sales growth of -86.00%, five-year EBIT growth of -118.44%, average ROE of 0.0%, and zero institutional holdings, the company fails every quality metric. The sole positive factor—being a "Net Cash Company" with debt-to-equity of -3.20—proves meaningless when the equity itself is negative.



The financial trend analysis flags multiple critical negatives: net profit at ₹-15.33 crores has fallen 1,441.80% versus the previous four-quarter average; PBDIT stands at its lowest level on record; profit before tax excluding other income hits rock bottom; and earnings per share reaches its nadir at ₹-6.39. Against these overwhelming negatives, the two cited positives (highest annual operating cash flow and higher six-month PAT) appear either accounting-driven or irrelevant given the Q2 collapse.



Key Strengths & Risk Factors





Key Strengths ✓



  • Promoter Commitment: 75% promoter holding with zero pledging suggests continued family commitment, though this may reflect inability to exit rather than conviction

  • RBI Registration: Maintains NBFC registration with Reserve Bank of India, providing regulatory framework (though compliance and operational activity remain questionable)

  • Zero Long-Term Debt: No long-term debt obligations reduce fixed interest burden, though current liabilities remain massive

  • Established Entity: 40-year operating history since 1985 establishment provides corporate continuity and legal structure

  • Occasional Profitability: Q1 FY26 profit of ₹16.24 crores demonstrates capacity for episodic positive performance when deals materialise




Key Concerns ⚠



  • Complete Revenue Collapse: Zero sales in Q2 FY26 (and multiple prior quarters) indicates fundamental business model failure with no visible revenue pipeline

  • Negative Equity Position: Shareholder funds of ₹-23.66 crores mean the company is technically insolvent on a balance sheet basis

  • Massive Wealth Destruction: 95.41% stock price decline over one year represents near-total shareholder capital erosion

  • Zero Institutional Interest: Complete absence of FII, mutual fund, insurance, or DII holdings signals professional investor avoidance

  • Working Capital Crisis: Current liabilities of ₹77.35 crores exceed current assets of ₹52.96 crores by ₹24.39 crores

  • Extreme Volatility: 105.08% annual volatility with negative Sharpe ratio creates "HIGH RISK LOW RETURN" classification

  • Chronic Losses: ₹-15.33 crore Q2 loss, ₹-6.00 crore FY25 loss, and negative five-year growth trends demonstrate sustained value destruction





Outlook: What to Watch





Positive Catalysts



  • Any revenue generation in Q3 FY26 would signal business continuity (currently zero)

  • Reduction in current liabilities below ₹70 crores would ease working capital pressure

  • Return to quarterly profitability (even modest ₹1-2 crores) would halt deterioration

  • Institutional investor entry (FII/MF) would validate turnaround credibility

  • Capital infusion to restore positive net worth would address solvency concerns




Red Flags



  • Another quarter of zero revenue (Q3 FY26) would confirm terminal business decline

  • Further expansion of net losses beyond ₹15-20 crores quarterly range

  • Increase in current liabilities above ₹80 crores without corresponding asset growth

  • Promoter stake reduction below 70% would signal abandonment by controlling shareholders

  • Stock price breach of ₹15.50 (52-week low) with no support visible

  • Any regulatory action or compliance issues from RBI regarding NBFC status






The Verdict: Terminal Decline Warrants Complete Avoidance


STRONG SELL

Score: 9/100


For Fresh Investors: Avoid completely. With negative equity of ₹-23.66 crores, zero revenue generation in the latest quarter, and 95.41% wealth destruction over the past year, Kiduja India represents a value trap where low absolute prices mask complete fundamental deterioration. The company exhibits characteristics of terminal business decline rather than temporary distress.


For Existing Holders: Exit on any technical bounce. The Q2 FY26 results confirm this is not a turnaround candidate but a company in severe financial distress. With current liabilities exceeding current assets by ₹24.39 crores and shareholder funds deeply negative, the risk of further capital erosion remains acute. The absence of institutional investors and chronic revenue volatility leave no credible path to recovery.


Fair Value Estimate: Not applicable. Traditional valuation frameworks collapse when applied to companies with negative equity and no sustainable revenue generation. The current price of ₹20.30 likely overvalues the entity given balance sheet insolvency.


Rationale: Kiduja India fails across all investment dimensions—negative financial trends, below-average quality, risky valuation, and deeply bearish technicals. The company's 9/100 Mojo Score reflects fundamental business model failure rather than temporary cyclical weakness. Until the company demonstrates sustained revenue generation, restoration of positive equity, and credible business strategy, it remains uninvestable at any price.





⚠️ Investment Disclaimer


This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investing in micro-cap stocks with negative equity and chronic losses carries extreme risk of total capital loss.





{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News