KMF Builders Q2 FY26: Revenue Drought Deepens as Losses Mount

Nov 17 2025 11:41 PM IST
share
Share Via
KMF Builders & Developers Ltd., a micro-cap real estate developer with a market capitalisation of ₹10.00 crores, reported a net loss of ₹0.04 crores for Q2 FY26 (Jul-Sep'25), marking the company's sixth consecutive quarter of zero revenue generation. The Bengaluru-based developer's shares closed at ₹8.31 on November 17, 2025, down 1.89% on the day and trading 42.41% below its 52-week high of ₹14.43.



The quarter's results underscore a deepening operational crisis at KMF Builders, with the company posting losses despite negligible business activity. Whilst the loss narrowed sequentially from ₹0.32 crores in Q1 FY26, the year-on-year comparison reveals a stark deterioration from Q2 FY25's ₹0.20 crore loss. The company's inability to generate revenue for six straight quarters raises fundamental questions about its business viability and project pipeline.





Net Loss (Q2 FY26)

₹0.04 Cr

▲ 87.5% QoQ improvement



Revenue (Q2 FY26)

₹0.00 Cr

6th consecutive zero-revenue quarter



Book Value

₹9.99

P/BV: 0.86x



Stock Performance (1Y)

+5.32%

Underperforms Sensex by 4.18%




The company's operational paralysis stands in stark contrast to its sporadic revenue generation in FY25, when it recorded ₹2.80 crores in sales during Q4 FY25 (Jan-Mar'25). That quarter proved to be an aberration rather than a turnaround, as the company has since reverted to zero revenue across the first two quarters of FY26. The prolonged revenue drought has placed significant strain on the company's ability to cover even minimal operating expenses.



Financial Performance: Operating in Survival Mode



KMF Builders' Q2 FY26 financial performance reveals a company struggling to maintain basic operations without any revenue inflows. The net loss of ₹0.04 crores, whilst narrower than the previous quarter's ₹0.32 crore loss, represents an 80% deterioration year-on-year from Q2 FY25's ₹0.20 crore loss. The sequential improvement stems primarily from reduced operating expenses rather than any fundamental business improvement.






















































Metric Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 Dec'24 Sep'24 Jun'24
Net Sales ₹0.00 ₹0.00 ₹2.80 ₹0.00 ₹0.00 ₹0.00
Operating Profit (excl OI) -₹0.23 -₹0.32 ₹1.17 -₹1.47 -₹0.29 -₹0.47
Other Income ₹0.21 ₹0.03 ₹0.27 ₹0.17 ₹0.12 ₹0.10
Net Profit/(Loss) -₹0.04 -₹0.32 ₹1.41 -₹1.33 -₹0.20 -₹0.40



The company's operating profit before depreciation, interest, and tax (excluding other income) stood at negative ₹0.23 crores in Q2 FY26, representing a 20.69% sequential improvement from the negative ₹0.32 crores in Q1 FY26. However, this metric remains deeply negative, reflecting the company's inability to cover basic operating costs through business operations. Employee costs of ₹0.12 crores remained flat quarter-on-quarter, consuming the entirety of the company's limited cash generation capacity.



Other income of ₹0.21 crores in Q2 FY26 provided crucial support, jumping 600% sequentially from ₹0.03 crores in Q1 FY26. This non-operating income, likely derived from interest on deposits or asset monetisation, has become the company's primary source of cash flow sustainability. The heavy reliance on other income underscores the absence of core business activity and raises concerns about the sustainability of even minimal operations.





Revenue (Q2 FY26)

₹0.00 Cr

Flat QoQ | N/A YoY



Net Loss (Q2 FY26)

-₹0.04 Cr

▲ 87.5% QoQ | ▼ 80% YoY



Operating Margin (excl OI)

N/A

Zero revenue base



Other Income

₹0.21 Cr

▲ 600% QoQ




On a half-yearly basis, H1 FY26 (Apr-Sep'25) witnessed a combined net loss of ₹0.36 crores on zero revenue, compared to H1 FY25's loss of ₹0.60 crores, also on zero revenue. The marginal improvement in losses reflects tighter cost control rather than any operational recovery. For the nine-month period ending September 2025, the company reported a net profit of ₹1.05 crores, but this figure is heavily skewed by the one-off Q4 FY25 performance and masks the underlying operational distress in recent quarters.



Balance Sheet Erosion: Shareholder Value Under Pressure



KMF Builders' balance sheet reveals a gradual erosion of shareholder value despite the company's debt-free status. Shareholder funds declined to ₹12.17 crores as of March 2025 from ₹12.69 crores in March 2024, reflecting the cumulative impact of operating losses. With equity capital remaining static at ₹6.09 crores, the decline stems entirely from reserves and surplus, which contracted from ₹6.59 crores to ₹6.08 crores during FY25.




Critical Balance Sheet Concerns


Shareholder Funds Decline: Reserves eroded by ₹0.51 crores in FY25 due to accumulated losses, reducing book value per share. Current assets of ₹12.50 crores as of March 2025 (down from ₹13.22 crores in March 2024) suggest limited liquidity generation. The company's minimal fixed asset base of ₹0.13 crores indicates negligible ongoing project activity or capital investment in new developments.




The company's debt-free status, with long-term debt of merely ₹0.27 crores, represents one of the few positive aspects of its financial profile. Net debt to equity stands at negative 0.30, indicating a net cash position. However, this financial conservatism appears driven by necessity rather than strategy, as the company lacks access to credit markets given its operational challenges. Current assets of ₹12.50 crores, primarily comprising cash and receivables, provide a cushion but are gradually depleting to fund losses.



The company's return on equity (ROE) averaged 2.50% over the past five years, but the latest ROE stands at negative 2.37%, reflecting the current loss-making status. More concerningly, the five-year EBIT growth rate of negative 168.43% highlights the severe deterioration in operating profitability. Whilst the average ROCE of 80.33% appears impressive, this metric is distorted by the company's minimal capital employed and occasional profitable quarters, masking the underlying operational dysfunction.



Real Estate Sector Context: Missing the Recovery



The Indian real estate sector has witnessed a robust recovery over the past two years, with residential sales reaching multi-year highs and property prices appreciating across major metropolitan markets. Bengaluru, where KMF Builders is headquartered, has been a particular beneficiary of this trend, driven by strong IT sector employment and infrastructure development. However, KMF Builders has conspicuously failed to participate in this sectoral upswing, with zero revenue generation for six consecutive quarters.



The company's inability to launch new projects or generate sales from existing inventory suggests fundamental challenges in project execution, regulatory approvals, or land monetisation. In a market environment where even small developers have managed to capitalise on strong housing demand, KMF Builders' operational paralysis stands out as an aberration. The company's minimal fixed asset base of ₹0.13 crores indicates negligible work-in-progress or land bank under development.




Sectoral Disconnect


Whilst the broader realty sector delivered 2.93% returns over the past year, KMF Builders managed only 5.32%, marginally outperforming by 2.39 percentage points. However, this relative outperformance masks the company's operational distress, with the stock price supported more by speculative trading in the micro-cap segment than by fundamental business performance. The stock's high beta of 1.50 and volatility of 75.07% underscore its speculative nature.




Peer Comparison: Lagging on Every Metric



A comparison with micro-cap realty peers reveals KMF Builders' weak positioning across key financial and valuation metrics. Whilst the company's average ROE of 2.50% appears marginally better than some peers, the current negative ROE and absence of revenue generation place it at a significant disadvantage. The company's price-to-book ratio of 0.86x suggests the market values it below book value, reflecting scepticism about asset realisation and future profitability.

















































Company P/E (TTM) P/BV Avg ROE (%) Debt to Equity Market Cap (₹ Cr)
KMF Builders NA (Loss Making) 0.86x 2.50% -0.30 10.00
Gyan Developers 12.50x 2.54x 4.77% -0.53 N/A
Crane Infra 25.91x N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sanathnagar Ent. NA (Loss Making) -0.87x 0.0% -1.07 N/A



KMF Builders' loss-making status prevents meaningful P/E ratio comparison, but the absence of profitability itself represents a critical competitive disadvantage. Gyan Developers, a comparable peer, trades at a P/E of 12.50x and commands a P/BV multiple of 2.54x, nearly three times KMF Builders' valuation. This valuation gap reflects the market's assessment of Gyan's superior operational execution and profitability, with an average ROE of 4.77% compared to KMF's 2.50%.



Valuation Analysis: Below Book Value for Good Reason



KMF Builders' current market price of ₹8.31 represents a 16.82% discount to its book value of ₹9.99 per share, with the price-to-book ratio at 0.86x. This below-book valuation reflects the market's scepticism about the company's ability to monetise its assets and generate future profits. The stock trades 42.41% below its 52-week high of ₹14.43, achieved in better market conditions when speculative interest in micro-cap stocks was elevated.



Traditional valuation metrics offer limited utility for KMF Builders given its loss-making status and zero revenue generation. The company's enterprise value to sales ratio of 2.84x appears meaningless when sales are absent. More telling is the negative EV/EBITDA of -7.94x, which underscores the company's value destruction rather than creation. The proprietary Mojo Score of 17 out of 100, placing the stock in "Strong Sell" territory, reflects the confluence of weak financials, bearish technicals, and risky valuation.





P/E Ratio (TTM)

NA

(Loss Making)



P/BV Ratio

0.86x

16.82% discount to book



EV/EBITDA

-7.94x

Negative EBITDA



Mojo Score

17/100

Strong Sell rating




The valuation assessment categorises KMF Builders as "Risky," a grade it has oscillated between and "Very Attractive" over the past year, reflecting the stock's volatile nature and speculative trading patterns. The current "Risky" designation, in place since February 2025, appears justified given the prolonged operational paralysis and mounting losses. Any valuation premium would require tangible evidence of project launches, revenue generation, or strategic initiatives to revive the business.



Shareholding Pattern: Stable but Uninspiring



KMF Builders' shareholding pattern has remained completely static over the past five quarters, with promoter holding locked at 48.23% and non-institutional investors holding the remaining 51.77%. The absence of any institutional participation—zero FII, mutual fund, insurance, or DII holdings—reflects the company's lack of appeal to sophisticated investors who conduct fundamental due diligence.

























































Shareholder Category Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 Dec'24 QoQ Change
Promoter Holding 48.23% 48.23% 48.23% 48.23% 0.00%
FII Holding 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Mutual Fund 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Insurance 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Non-Institutional 51.77% 51.77% 51.77% 51.77% 0.00%



The static nature of shareholding suggests limited trading interest and poor liquidity. The promoter group, led by KMF Securities Ltd (14.72%), Gorve Chadha (9.51%), and family members, has maintained its stake without any buying or selling activity. Positively, there is zero promoter pledging, indicating no immediate financial distress at the promoter level. However, the absence of institutional investors and the concentration of non-institutional holdings underscore the stock's speculative nature and limited institutional credibility.



Stock Performance: Volatility Without Direction



KMF Builders' stock has delivered a one-year return of 5.32%, marginally outperforming the realty sector's 2.93% but underperforming the Sensex's 9.50% by 4.18 percentage points. However, this modest positive return masks extreme volatility, with the stock exhibiting a standard deviation of 75.07% over the past year. The high volatility and low absolute returns result in a risk-adjusted return of just 0.07, compared to the Sensex's 0.77, highlighting the poor risk-reward profile.































































Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week -9.18% +1.69% -10.87%
1 Month -1.42% +1.19% -2.61%
3 Months -5.25% +5.40% -10.65%
6 Months -11.31% +3.18% -14.49%
YTD -18.45% +8.72% -27.17%
1 Year +5.32% +9.50% -4.18%
2 Years +76.43% +29.12% +47.31%
3 Years +134.75% +37.57% +97.18%



The stock's recent performance has been particularly weak, with negative returns across all timeframes from one week to year-to-date. The stock declined 9.18% over the past week and 18.45% year-to-date, significantly underperforming the Sensex's 8.72% YTD gain. This deterioration coincides with the market's growing recognition of the company's operational challenges and the absence of any near-term catalysts for recovery.



Technical indicators paint a uniformly bearish picture. The stock trades below all key moving averages—5-day (₹8.64), 20-day (₹9.06), 50-day (₹9.13), 100-day (₹9.14), and 200-day (₹9.76)—indicating sustained selling pressure. The overall technical trend turned "Bearish" on November 11, 2025, from "Mildly Bearish," with MACD, Bollinger Bands, and moving averages all flashing bearish signals. The stock's beta of 1.50 indicates it tends to amplify market movements, making it particularly vulnerable during market corrections.



Investment Thesis: All Red Flags, No Green Shoots



KMF Builders' investment thesis, if one can call it that, rests entirely on speculative hope rather than fundamental merit. The company's Mojo Score of 17 out of 100 reflects the confluence of multiple negative factors: weak quality grade (Below Average), flat financial trend, bearish technical trend, and risky valuation. Each of the four key investment parameters—valuation, quality, financial trend, and technicals—points towards avoiding the stock.





Valuation

RISKY

Below book but justified



Quality Grade

BELOW AVERAGE

Weak fundamentals



Financial Trend

FLAT

Zero revenue, persistent losses



Technical Trend

BEARISH

Below all moving averages




The quality assessment categorises KMF Builders as "Below Average," reflecting weak long-term financial performance despite some positive factors like zero debt and no promoter pledging. The company's five-year sales growth of 4.85% and EBIT growth of negative 168.43% underscore chronic operational underperformance. The average ROE of 2.50% barely exceeds risk-free returns, whilst the current negative ROE highlights ongoing value destruction.




"Six consecutive quarters of zero revenue generation is not a temporary setback—it's a fundamental business failure that raises existential questions about the company's viability."


Key Strengths & Risk Factors





Key Strengths



  • Debt-Free Balance Sheet: Long-term debt of only ₹0.27 crores with net cash position (debt to equity: -0.30) eliminates solvency risk

  • Zero Promoter Pledging: No pledged shares indicates promoters are not facing immediate financial distress

  • Adequate Current Assets: ₹12.50 crores in current assets provides cushion to sustain operations for several quarters

  • Bengaluru Location: Headquarters in a high-growth real estate market offers potential for future project launches

  • Micro-Cap Positioning: Small size allows for potential turnaround with single successful project launch




Key Risk Factors



  • Operational Paralysis: Six consecutive quarters of zero revenue indicate fundamental business dysfunction

  • Persistent Losses: Continuous quarterly losses eroding shareholder value despite minimal operations

  • No Institutional Interest: Zero FII, MF, insurance, or DII holdings reflects lack of credibility with sophisticated investors

  • Minimal Fixed Assets: ₹0.13 crores in fixed assets suggests no ongoing projects or land bank under development

  • High Volatility: 75.07% volatility with beta of 1.50 makes stock highly risky for retail investors

  • Weak Corporate Governance Signals: Lack of transparency on project pipeline and strategic direction

  • Liquidity Concerns: Minimal trading volumes (495 shares on Nov 17) make entry/exit difficult





Outlook: What to Watch (Or Rather, What to Avoid)



For investors still considering KMF Builders despite the overwhelming evidence of operational distress, the following monitoring points would be critical. However, the more prudent course of action would be to avoid the stock entirely until concrete evidence of business revival emerges.





Positive Catalysts (Highly Unlikely)



  • Project Launch Announcement: Any new residential or commercial project with clear timelines and pre-sales

  • Revenue Generation: Resumption of sales activity from existing inventory or new launches

  • Strategic Partnership: Tie-up with larger developer or financial investor to revive operations

  • Asset Monetisation: Sale of land bank or properties to generate cash and reduce losses




Red Flags (Already Present)



  • Continued Revenue Drought: Q3 FY26 results showing zero revenue would mark seventh consecutive quarter

  • Accelerating Losses: Widening quarterly losses despite cost control efforts

  • Promoter Stake Sale: Any reduction in 48.23% promoter holding would signal loss of confidence

  • Regulatory Issues: Any SEBI, stock exchange, or legal proceedings affecting the company

  • Further Stock Price Decline: Break below ₹7.27 (52-week low) would signal new depths





The company's forward outlook remains bleak without tangible evidence of business revival. The real estate sector's strong fundamentals make KMF Builders' operational paralysis even more conspicuous and concerning. Until the company demonstrates its ability to launch projects, generate revenue, and return to profitability, it remains a value trap rather than a value opportunity.




The Verdict: A Failing Business Masquerading as an Investment


STRONG SELL

Score: 17/100


For Fresh Investors: Avoid entirely. Six consecutive quarters of zero revenue generation, persistent losses, and absence of any visible project pipeline make this an unviable investment. The below-book valuation is justified given the operational paralysis and uncertain future. Numerous better opportunities exist in the real estate sector and broader market.


For Existing Holders: Exit at current levels or any technical bounce. The stock's 42.41% decline from 52-week highs reflects the market's recognition of fundamental business failure. Holding in hope of a turnaround exposes investors to further value erosion and opportunity cost. The debt-free balance sheet provides time but no guarantee of revival.


Fair Value Estimate: ₹6.50-7.00 (22-16% downside from current ₹8.31), reflecting liquidation value of assets minus ongoing losses. Any valuation above book value would require demonstrated revenue generation and profitability—neither of which appears imminent.





Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)





⚠️ Investment Disclaimer


This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investments in micro-cap stocks carry substantial risk of capital loss.





{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News