Lagnam Spintex Q2 FY26: Margins Collapse as Profitability Concerns Mount

Nov 11 2025 12:06 PM IST
share
Share Via
Lagnam Spintex Ltd., a Bhilwara-based cotton yarn manufacturer, reported deeply concerning Q2 FY26 results that underscore mounting operational pressures in the textile sector. Net profit plunged 80.71% quarter-on-quarter to ₹0.38 crores from ₹1.97 crores in Q1 FY26, whilst remaining virtually flat year-on-year. The ₹136-crore market capitalisation company, trading at ₹75.30, has seen its stock decline 49.42% from its 52-week high of ₹148.87, reflecting investor concerns about deteriorating fundamentals and weak demand conditions.





Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

₹0.38 Cr

▼ 80.71% QoQ



Revenue (Q2 FY26)

₹132.43 Cr

▼ 5.47% QoQ



Operating Margin

8.97%

▼ 177 bps QoQ



PAT Margin

0.29%

▼ 112 bps QoQ




The September quarter results reveal a company grappling with multiple headwinds: contracting revenues, deteriorating margins, and elevated interest costs that are severely constraining bottom-line performance. Net sales declined 5.47% sequentially to ₹132.43 crores, marking the lowest quarterly revenue in the past year. More alarmingly, operating profit margin excluding other income contracted sharply to 8.97% from 10.74% in the previous quarter, whilst PAT margin collapsed to a mere 0.29% from 1.41%. This represents the weakest profitability profile witnessed across the trailing twelve-month period.































































Quarter Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 Dec'24 Sep'24 Jun'24
Net Sales (₹ Cr) 132.43 140.10 162.86 148.39 134.34 159.97
QoQ Change (%) -5.47% -13.98% +9.75% +10.46% -16.02%
Operating Margin (%) 8.97% 10.74% 15.21% 10.20% 8.71% 8.56%
Net Profit (₹ Cr) 0.38 1.97 8.54 2.35 0.38 1.58
PAT Margin (%) 0.29% 1.41% 5.24% 1.58% 0.28% 0.99%



Financial Performance: Deteriorating Profitability Across All Metrics



The quarter-on-quarter analysis reveals a company under significant stress. Net sales declined 5.47% to ₹132.43 crores in Q2 FY26 from ₹140.10 crores in Q1 FY26, representing the lowest quarterly revenue in the past year. Year-on-year performance was marginally better but still negative, with sales contracting 1.42% from ₹134.34 crores in Q2 FY24. This sequential decline is particularly concerning as it marks the second consecutive quarter of revenue contraction, following the 13.98% drop witnessed in Q1 FY26.



Operating profit excluding other income plummeted 20.97% quarter-on-quarter to ₹11.88 crores, whilst operating margin contracted 177 basis points to 8.97%. This margin compression reflects both volume pressure and unfavourable operating leverage. The company's gross profit margin deteriorated to 3.50% from 4.93% in the previous quarter, indicating pricing pressures and potentially unfavourable raw material cost dynamics. Interest costs remained elevated at ₹7.32 crores, consuming 61.62% of operating profit and severely constraining profitability.



Net profit of ₹0.38 crores represents an 80.71% collapse from the previous quarter's ₹1.97 crores, translating to an earnings per share of just ₹0.22. The PAT margin of 0.29% is amongst the weakest witnessed in the company's recent history, highlighting the severe pressure on bottom-line profitability. Tax expenses were minimal at ₹0.03 crores with an effective tax rate of 7.32%, reflecting the company's weak pre-tax profitability.





Revenue (Q2 FY26)

₹132.43 Cr

▼ 5.47% QoQ | ▼ 1.42% YoY



Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

₹0.38 Cr

▼ 80.71% QoQ | Flat YoY



Operating Margin

8.97%

vs 10.74% in Q1 FY26



PAT Margin

0.29%

vs 1.41% in Q1 FY26




Operational Challenges: High Leverage and Weak Interest Coverage



Lagnam Spintex's operational metrics paint a concerning picture of a highly leveraged company struggling with profitability. The company's return on equity of 10.95% for the latest period, whilst positive, has declined from the average of 15.15% over the past five years. Return on capital employed stands at 8.38%, significantly below the historical average of 10.91%, indicating deteriorating capital efficiency.



The balance sheet reveals substantial leverage concerns. Long-term debt stood at ₹201.64 crores as of March 2025, whilst shareholder funds totalled ₹120.87 crores, resulting in a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.67 times. However, the more comprehensive net debt to equity ratio averaged 3.21 times over the past five years, highlighting the company's heavy reliance on borrowed capital. This elevated leverage becomes particularly problematic when profitability weakens, as evidenced in Q2 FY26.



Interest coverage has deteriorated to alarming levels. The operating profit to interest ratio in Q2 FY26 stood at just 1.62 times, the lowest in recent quarters. This means the company is generating barely enough operating profit to service its interest obligations, leaving minimal cushion for principal repayments or unexpected shocks. The average EBIT to interest coverage of 2.57 times over the past five years, whilst better, still indicates a company operating with limited financial flexibility.




Critical Leverage Concerns


High Debt Burden: The company operates with an average net debt to equity ratio of 3.21 times and debt to EBITDA of 20.73 times, representing one of the highest leverage profiles in the sector. With interest costs consuming over 60% of operating profits in Q2 FY26, the company has minimal financial flexibility to absorb further deterioration in operating performance or navigate adverse market conditions.




Textile Sector Headwinds: Demand Weakness and Margin Pressure



The textile and apparel sector has faced significant headwinds in recent quarters, with weak domestic demand, sluggish exports, and elevated cotton prices pressuring manufacturers. Lagnam Spintex's performance reflects these broader industry challenges, with revenue declining sequentially for the second consecutive quarter and margins compressing sharply. The company's focus on cotton yarn manufacturing exposes it directly to cotton price volatility and demand fluctuations in downstream garment manufacturing.



The operating margin compression from 15.21% in Q4 FY25 to just 8.97% in Q2 FY26 suggests the company is struggling to pass through cost increases to customers or is facing intense competitive pressure. The gross profit margin of 3.50% in Q2 FY26 is particularly concerning, as it provides limited cushion to absorb operating expenses and interest costs. This thin margin profile leaves the company vulnerable to even modest adverse movements in raw material prices or realisations.



Working capital management appears strained, with the balance sheet showing current liabilities of ₹215.57 crores against current assets of ₹229.09 crores as of March 2025. The cash flow statement reveals that the company consumed ₹38.00 crores in working capital in FY25, indicating growing inventory or receivables that tie up cash. Operating cash flow of ₹24.07 crores in FY25, whilst positive, was insufficient to fund capital expenditure and debt servicing requirements without additional borrowing.




Quality of Earnings Concern


The sharp divergence between operating profit and net profit highlights the burden of elevated interest costs. In Q2 FY26, the company generated ₹11.88 crores in operating profit but reported just ₹0.38 crores in net profit after accounting for ₹7.32 crores in interest and ₹4.21 crores in depreciation. This 96.80% leakage from operating profit to net profit underscores the unsustainable nature of the current capital structure and the urgent need for deleveraging.




Peer Comparison: Valuation Discount Reflects Fundamental Weakness



Within the garments and apparels sector, Lagnam Spintex trades at a significant discount to peers on most valuation metrics, though this appears justified by its weak fundamentals and high leverage. The company's price-to-earnings ratio of 10.39 times compares favourably to the sector average of approximately 34 times, but this discount reflects concerns about earnings quality and sustainability rather than representing an attractive entry point.

































































Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE (%) Debt/Equity Div Yield (%)
Lagnam Spintex 10.39 1.14 15.15% 3.21
Indian CardCloth 7.86 0.43 2.35% -0.18
N R Vandana 34.16 4.36 17.01% 2.07
Salona Cotspin 60.46 1.74 17.81% 2.86 0.37%
Lambodhara Text. 19.15 0.11 11.16% -0.17 0.38%
Lovable Lingerie 48.08 0.80 1.57% 0.05



Lagnam Spintex's return on equity of 15.15% (5-year average) is respectable and higher than most peers, but this must be viewed in the context of the company's 3.21 times net debt-to-equity ratio. The elevated leverage artificially inflates ROE, and the metric becomes less meaningful when profitability is as volatile and thin as witnessed in recent quarters. The price-to-book ratio of 1.14 times appears reasonable but provides little comfort given the deteriorating earnings trajectory.



The company's debt-to-equity ratio of 3.21 times is amongst the highest in the peer group, with only Salona Cotspin (2.86 times) and N R Vandana (2.07 times) operating with comparable leverage. This high debt burden, combined with weak interest coverage, distinguishes Lagnam Spintex as one of the riskier propositions in the sector. The absence of dividend payments reflects the company's need to conserve cash for debt servicing and working capital requirements.



Valuation Analysis: Discount Justified by Fundamental Concerns



At the current market price of ₹75.30, Lagnam Spintex trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of 10.39 times trailing twelve-month earnings, representing a 69.65% discount to the sector average P/E of approximately 34 times. However, this valuation discount appears entirely justified when considering the company's deteriorating financial trend, elevated leverage, and weak profitability. The stock has declined 49.42% from its 52-week high of ₹148.87, with the sharp correction reflecting growing investor concerns about the sustainability of the business model.



The price-to-book ratio of 1.14 times compares to a book value per share of ₹68.41, suggesting limited downside protection from asset values. The enterprise value to EBITDA multiple of 7.89 times appears superficially attractive, but this metric becomes less relevant when EBITDA generation is inconsistent and heavily burdened by interest costs. The EV to sales ratio of 0.90 times reflects the company's thin margins and capital-intensive nature.



The proprietary Mojo Score of 23 out of 100 with a "Strong Sell" rating reflects the confluence of negative factors: bearish technical trend, negative financial trend, below-average quality grade, and high leverage. Whilst the valuation grade is marked as "Attractive," this alone is insufficient to justify investment when fundamentals are deteriorating. The stock's valuation has moved from "Very Attractive" to "Attractive" in recent months, suggesting that even at current depressed levels, the risk-reward profile remains unfavourable.





P/E Ratio (TTM)

10.39x

vs Sector: 34x



Price to Book

1.14x

Book Value: ₹68.41



EV/EBITDA

7.89x

Below sector average



Mojo Score

23/100

Strong Sell Rating




Shareholding Pattern: Stable but Elevated Promoter Pledge



The shareholding pattern has remained remarkably stable over the past five quarters, with promoter holding steady at 48.16% and no institutional participation from foreign institutional investors, mutual funds, or insurance companies. Non-institutional shareholders hold 31.50%, with the remaining 20.34% likely held by retail and other investors. The absence of institutional investors is noteworthy and reflects limited interest from sophisticated investors, likely due to concerns about the company's size, liquidity, and financial profile.

























































Category Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 Dec'24 Sep'24
Promoter Holding 48.16% 48.16% 48.16% 48.16% 48.16%
FII Holding 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Mutual Fund 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Insurance 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Non-Institutional 31.50% 31.50% 31.50% 31.50% 31.50%



A significant concern is the elevated promoter pledging at 48.16% of promoter holdings. This means the entire promoter stake is pledged, creating substantial risk in the event of further stock price declines. High promoter pledging is generally viewed negatively as it suggests financial stress at the promoter level and creates the risk of forced selling if margin calls are triggered. The stability in shareholding over multiple quarters, whilst providing some comfort, cannot offset the fundamental concerns around pledging and the absence of quality institutional investors.



Stock Performance: Severe Underperformance Across All Timeframes



Lagnam Spintex's stock performance has been dismal across virtually all meaningful timeframes, with the stock significantly underperforming both the Sensex and its sector peers. Over the past year, the stock has declined 33.60% compared to a 4.94% gain in the Sensex, resulting in a negative alpha of 38.54 percentage points. The year-to-date performance is even worse, with a 42.28% decline against a 6.76% gain in the benchmark, translating to 49.04 percentage points of underperformance.

























































Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week -4.37% -0.05% -4.32%
1 Month -9.66% +1.11% -10.77%
3 Months -19.46% +3.49% -22.95%
6 Months -35.09% +4.99% -40.08%
Year to Date -42.28% +6.76% -49.04%
1 Year -33.60% +4.94% -38.54%
3 Years +21.26% +34.99% -13.73%



The stock is trading below all key moving averages, with the current price of ₹75.30 representing declines of 4.34% from the 5-day moving average, 7.42% from the 20-day average, 9.63% from the 50-day average, 17.45% from the 100-day average, and 25.01% from the 200-day moving average. This technical setup indicates a stock in a sustained downtrend with no signs of stabilisation. The stock's beta of 1.50 suggests it is 50% more volatile than the market, amplifying losses during market corrections.



Relative to its sector, Lagnam Spintex has underperformed dramatically. The garments and apparels sector declined 1.84% over the past year, meaning Lagnam underperformed its sector by 31.76 percentage points. This sector-relative underperformance highlights company-specific issues beyond broader industry headwinds. The risk-adjusted return of -0.75 and volatility of 45.07% over the past year place the stock firmly in the "high risk, low return" category—the worst possible quadrant for investors.



Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags Outweigh Valuation Discount



The investment thesis for Lagnam Spintex is overwhelmingly negative across all key parameters. The proprietary Mojo framework assigns a score of just 23 out of 100, with a "Strong Sell" rating that reflects the confluence of deteriorating fundamentals, adverse technicals, and elevated financial risk. The company scores poorly on near-term drivers (negative financial trend, bearish technicals), quality assessment (below-average grade, high leverage), and momentum (severe underperformance).





Valuation Grade

Attractive

Discount to sector



Quality Grade

Below Avg

High leverage



Financial Trend

Negative

Deteriorating



Technical Trend

Bearish

All MAs broken




The financial trend analysis classifies Q2 FY26 as "Negative," with multiple red flags including net profit at ₹0.38 crores (down 88.50% from the previous four-quarter average), operating profit to interest coverage at a record low of 1.62 times, net sales at the lowest quarterly level of ₹132.43 crores, and profit before tax excluding other income at just ₹0.34 crores. These metrics collectively paint a picture of a company in financial distress, struggling to generate adequate returns on its substantial capital base.



The quality assessment highlights the company's below-average long-term financial performance, characterised by weak interest coverage (2.57 times average EBIT to interest), extremely high debt to EBITDA of 20.73 times, and elevated net debt to equity of 3.21 times. Whilst the 5-year sales CAGR of 22.47% demonstrates growth, this has not translated into sustainable profitability or cash generation. The absence of institutional investors and 48.16% promoter pledging further undermine confidence in the company's governance and financial stability.





Key Strengths ✓



  • Historical Sales Growth: 5-year sales CAGR of 22.47% demonstrates revenue expansion capability

  • Valuation Discount: P/E of 10.39x represents 69.65% discount to sector average

  • Asset Base: Fixed assets of ₹333.81 crores provide manufacturing capacity

  • Established Operations: ISO 9001:2015 certified with export capabilities

  • Stable Shareholding: No recent promoter stake dilution or major changes




Key Concerns ⚠️



  • Collapsing Profitability: Net profit down 80.71% QoQ to ₹0.38 crores with PAT margin of just 0.29%

  • Extreme Leverage: Net debt to equity of 3.21x with debt to EBITDA at 20.73x

  • Weak Interest Coverage: Operating profit to interest at 1.62x, lowest on record

  • Promoter Pledging: 48.16% of promoter holdings pledged, indicating financial stress

  • No Institutional Support: Zero FII, MF, or insurance holdings

  • Deteriorating Margins: Operating margin contracted from 15.21% to 8.97% in two quarters

  • Negative Cash Dynamics: Working capital consumption of ₹38 crores in FY25





Outlook: Monitoring Points and Red Flags



The outlook for Lagnam Spintex remains challenging, with multiple structural concerns that require close monitoring. Investors should watch for any signs of stabilisation in operating margins, improvement in interest coverage ratios, or reduction in debt levels. However, given the current trajectory and the company's constrained financial flexibility, the probability of meaningful near-term improvement appears low.





Positive Catalysts



  • Stabilisation of operating margins above 12%

  • Sequential revenue growth for two consecutive quarters

  • Debt reduction and improvement in interest coverage above 3x

  • Recovery in textile sector demand and pricing

  • Entry of quality institutional investors




Red Flags to Watch



  • Further deterioration in interest coverage below 1.5x

  • Additional quarter of sequential revenue decline

  • Operating margin falling below 8%

  • Any increase in promoter pledging or stake sale

  • Working capital stress leading to vendor payment delays

  • Inability to service debt obligations






"With operating profit barely covering interest costs and margins at multi-quarter lows, Lagnam Spintex faces an unsustainable financial trajectory that requires immediate structural intervention."


The textile sector headwinds are unlikely to abate quickly, with weak domestic demand, subdued exports, and volatile raw material prices expected to persist. For a highly leveraged player like Lagnam Spintex, these conditions create an environment where even modest operational missteps can have severe consequences for financial stability. The company's thin margins provide no buffer to absorb shocks, whilst the elevated debt burden constrains strategic flexibility.



The technical picture reinforces the negative fundamental outlook, with the stock in a sustained bearish trend since August 2025. Trading below all key moving averages and with consistently negative momentum indicators, the stock shows no signs of forming a technical base. The high beta of 1.50 means the stock is likely to underperform during market corrections, whilst offering limited upside participation during rallies given the fundamental constraints.




The Verdict: Avoid—Fundamental Deterioration Outweighs Valuation Discount


STRONG SELL

Score: 23/100


For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating any position. The combination of collapsing profitability, extreme leverage, weak interest coverage, and elevated promoter pledging creates an unfavourable risk-reward profile. The valuation discount is a value trap rather than an opportunity, reflecting legitimate concerns about earnings sustainability and financial stability. Better opportunities exist in the textile sector with stronger balance sheets and improving fundamentals.


For Existing Holders: Consider exiting positions at current levels or on any technical bounce. The deteriorating financial trend, negative quarterly results, and structural leverage concerns suggest further downside risk. The 48.16% promoter pledging creates additional risk of forced selling. Holders should reassess their investment thesis in light of the sharp margin compression and weakening profitability profile. Capital preservation should take priority over hope for a turnaround.


Fair Value Estimate: ₹65-70 (9-13% downside from current levels) based on sustainable earnings power of ₹8-10 crores annually and applying a 10-12x P/E multiple appropriate for a highly leveraged, cyclical manufacturer. Current price of ₹75.30 appears fairly valued to slightly overvalued given the deteriorating fundamentals.





Note— ROCE = (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)





⚠️ Investment Disclaimer


This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investments in equities are subject to market risks, and investors may lose part or all of their invested capital.





{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News