Leading Leasing Finance Q2 FY26: Profit Surge Masks Underlying Structural Concerns

Nov 15 2025 10:55 AM IST
share
Share Via
Leading Leasing Finance & Investment Company Ltd. reported a net profit of ₹1.70 crores for Q2 FY26, marking a remarkable turnaround from losses in the same period last year. However, the micro-cap NBFC's performance reveals troubling dependencies on non-operating income and faces mounting technical headwinds, with the stock plunging 53.40% over the past year to ₹5.27. Despite impressive headline growth numbers, the company's structural challenges and elevated valuation multiples warrant caution.





Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

₹1.70 Cr

▲ 839.1% YoY



Net Sales (Q2 FY26)

₹11.09 Cr

▲ 73.01% YoY



PAT Margin

15.33%

vs -3.59% YoY



Return on Equity

10.68%

Average




Leading Leasing Finance & Investment Company Ltd., a Delhi-based non-banking financial company registered with the Reserve Bank of India, operates in the lending space with a diversified portfolio across retail, SME, and commercial segments. With a market capitalisation of ₹288.00 crores and zero promoter holding, the company presents an unusual ownership structure dominated by foreign institutional investors holding 54.08% of equity.



The Q2 FY26 results paint a picture of dramatic recovery on paper, with net profit surging to ₹1.70 crores compared to a loss of ₹0.23 crores in Q2 FY25. However, this recovery masks fundamental operational weaknesses that become apparent upon closer examination of the company's earnings quality and sustainability.



Financial Performance: Growth Built on Fragile Foundations



In Q2 FY26, Leading Leasing Finance reported net sales of ₹11.09 crores, representing a marginal sequential increase of 0.09% from ₹11.08 crores in Q1 FY26, but a substantial 73.01% year-on-year growth from ₹6.41 crores in Q2 FY25. The company has maintained this elevated revenue run rate for two consecutive quarters after a dramatic jump in Q1 FY26, which saw sales surge 336.22% year-on-year.

































































Quarter Net Sales (₹ Cr) QoQ Change Net Profit (₹ Cr) PAT Margin
Sep'25 11.09 +0.09% 1.70 15.33%
Jun'25 11.08 +3.55% 5.67 51.17%
Mar'25 10.70 +15.80% 4.71 44.02%
Dec'24 9.24 +44.15% -0.70 -7.58%
Sep'24 6.41 +152.36% -0.23 -3.59%
Jun'24 2.54 +37.30% -0.02 -0.79%
Mar'24 1.85 0.43 23.24%



The profitability trajectory reveals significant volatility. After posting a net profit of ₹5.67 crores in Q1 FY26—the highest in the company's recent history—net profit declined 70.02% sequentially to ₹1.70 crores in Q2 FY26. This dramatic quarter-on-quarter contraction raises questions about earnings sustainability despite the positive year-on-year comparison.



Operating profit before depreciation, interest, and tax (excluding other income) stood at ₹10.79 crores in Q2 FY26, yielding an operating margin of 97.29%. Whilst this appears exceptionally strong, it reflects the nature of NBFC operations where interest income constitutes the primary revenue stream. The sequential decline from 97.74% in Q1 FY26 is marginal but continues a downward trend from the extraordinary 124.30% margin in Q4 FY25.



Interest expenses consumed ₹10.32 crores in Q2 FY26, up 5.63% sequentially from ₹9.77 crores in Q1 FY26 and 85.28% higher year-on-year from ₹5.57 crores in Q2 FY25. This rising interest burden reflects the company's aggressive borrowing to fund its lending operations, with net interest margin compression becoming increasingly evident.




⚠️ Earnings Quality Red Flag


Non-operating income comprised 75.94% of profit before tax in Q2 FY26, indicating that the company's reported profitability is heavily dependent on other income rather than core lending operations. This raises serious concerns about the sustainability and quality of earnings, as non-operating income tends to be volatile and unreliable for long-term value creation.




The Non-Operating Income Dependency: A Structural Weakness



The most concerning aspect of Leading Leasing Finance's financial performance lies in its dependence on other income. In Q2 FY26, other income totalled ₹1.42 crores against a profit before tax of ₹1.87 crores, meaning non-operating sources contributed 75.94% of pre-tax profits. This represents a structural weakness in the business model.



The volatility of other income is striking. It surged to ₹5.84 crores in Q1 FY26, then collapsed to ₹1.42 crores in Q2 FY26—a 75.68% sequential decline. In Q4 FY25, the company reported negative other income of ₹0.13 crores. This erratic pattern suggests that other income is not a stable, recurring source of profitability but rather comprises one-off gains or volatile treasury operations.



For an NBFC, sustainable profitability should derive primarily from net interest income—the spread between interest earned on loans and interest paid on borrowings. Leading Leasing Finance's heavy reliance on other income to achieve profitability indicates that its core lending operations may be barely breaking even or operating at thin margins after accounting for credit costs and operational expenses.



The company's return on equity of 10.68% on an average basis, whilst positive, remains modest for the NBFC sector and reflects the challenges in generating consistent returns from core operations. The latest quarterly ROE of 7.68% has declined from the historical average, suggesting deteriorating capital efficiency.



Balance Sheet Concerns: Rapid Liability Growth



The balance sheet reveals aggressive expansion funded primarily through debt. Current liabilities surged to ₹494.10 crores as of March 2025 from ₹113.25 crores in March 2024—a staggering 336.28% increase. This dramatic escalation in liabilities far outpaced the growth in assets, raising concerns about the company's funding strategy and asset-liability management.



Shareholder funds stood at ₹121.39 crores as of March 2025, up from ₹13.86 crores in March 2024, primarily due to a significant increase in share capital from ₹10.67 crores to ₹43.96 crores. This four-fold increase in equity capital through dilution has been necessary to support the rapid expansion in lending operations, but it also raises questions about the returns being generated on this newly deployed capital.



The company maintains a debt-to-equity ratio of 3.99, indicating high financial leverage. Whilst leverage is common in the NBFC sector, this level of debt relative to equity means that the company is highly sensitive to interest rate movements and credit quality deterioration. With minimal long-term debt on the books, the company appears to be funding its operations primarily through short-term liabilities, which introduces refinancing risk.



Current assets stood at ₹29.90 crores as of March 2025, up from ₹11.89 crores in March 2024. However, this pales in comparison to current liabilities of ₹494.10 crores, resulting in a severely negative working capital position. For an NBFC, this metric must be interpreted carefully as loan assets may be classified differently, but the magnitude of the mismatch warrants scrutiny regarding liquidity management.




Cash Flow Strain


Operating cash flow was negative ₹380.00 crores in FY25, indicating that the company consumed significant cash in its operations. This was offset by financing cash flow of ₹458.00 crores, demonstrating heavy reliance on external funding. The company invested ₹78.00 crores in its business, resulting in a marginal net cash outflow of ₹1.00 crore for the year. This cash flow pattern is characteristic of a rapidly expanding NBFC but raises sustainability concerns if operating cash generation does not improve.




Peer Comparison: Expensive Valuation Despite Operational Challenges



When compared to its NBFC peer group, Leading Leasing Finance presents a mixed picture. The company trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of 30.74x, which is moderate compared to some peers but appears expensive given the quality concerns and earnings volatility.


























































Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE % Debt/Equity
Leading Lea. Fin 30.74 2.36 10.68% 3.99
U. Y. Fincorp 17.32 0.87 7.34% 0.01
Starteck Fin. 17.73 1.17 6.72% 1.08
Landmarc Leisur. 1381.33 11.37 0.52% 0.50
Regency Fincorp 28.02 2.28 4.78% 0.84
NDL Ventures 385.84 4.78 0.00% -0.09



Leading Leasing Finance commands a premium valuation on the P/E metric compared to operationally similar peers like U. Y. Fincorp (17.32x) and Starteck Finance (17.73x). However, it does offer the highest return on equity at 10.68% amongst this peer set, which partially justifies the valuation premium. The company's ROE significantly exceeds the peer average of approximately 4%.



On a price-to-book basis, Leading Leasing Finance trades at 2.36x, which is relatively reasonable compared to peers and below the peer average of approximately 4.1x. This suggests that whilst the earnings multiple appears elevated, the market is not assigning an excessive premium to the company's net asset value.



The key differentiator—and concern—is the debt-to-equity ratio of 3.99, which is substantially higher than most peers. U. Y. Fincorp operates with minimal leverage at 0.01, whilst Starteck Finance maintains a more moderate 1.08. Leading Leasing Finance's aggressive use of leverage amplifies both potential returns and risks, making the company more vulnerable to adverse credit events or funding cost increases.



Valuation Analysis: Premium Not Justified by Fundamentals



At the current market price of ₹5.27, Leading Leasing Finance trades at a P/E ratio of 30.74x compared to the NBFC industry average of 23x, representing a 33.65% premium to sector valuations. This premium appears difficult to justify given the company's operational challenges, earnings quality concerns, and recent stock price underperformance.



The company's price-to-book ratio of 2.36x suggests the market values the company at more than double its book value per share of ₹2.22. For an NBFC with modest ROE and high leverage, this valuation appears stretched. Historically, the stock has traded at much higher multiples—reaching a 52-week high of ₹11.99 in the past year—but the 56.05% decline from that peak reflects growing investor scepticism about the sustainability of the business model.



The PEG ratio of 0.03 appears attractive on the surface, suggesting the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate. However, this metric can be misleading when earnings growth is volatile or driven by non-recurring items rather than sustainable operational improvements. Given the heavy dependence on other income and the sequential profit decline in Q2 FY26, the low PEG ratio should be viewed with caution.



The company's valuation grade has been classified as "Very Expensive" since October 2025, having been upgraded briefly to "Expensive" and "Fair" at various points in 2024. This classification reflects the market's recognition that current valuations do not adequately account for the risks inherent in the business.




"With 75.94% of profits derived from non-operating income and a 70% sequential profit decline, the sustainability of Leading Leasing Finance's earnings model remains highly questionable despite impressive year-on-year growth comparisons."


Shareholding Pattern: Unusual Ownership Structure



Leading Leasing Finance presents an atypical shareholding structure for an Indian NBFC, with zero promoter holding. This absence of promoter stake is unusual in the Indian financial services sector and may contribute to governance concerns or lack of long-term strategic direction.



















































Quarter Promoter % FII % MF % Non-Institutional %
Sep'25 0.00% 54.08% 0.00% 45.92%
Jun'25 0.00% 56.00% 0.00% 44.00%
May'25 0.00% 49.68% 0.00% 50.32%
Mar'25 0.00% 43.39% 0.00% 56.61%
Dec'24 0.00% 46.01% 0.00% 53.99%



Foreign institutional investors hold 54.08% of the company as of September 2025, down from 56.00% in June 2025. This 1.92 percentage point sequential decline suggests some FII profit-booking or reallocation. However, FII holdings have increased substantially from 43.39% in March 2025, indicating growing foreign investor interest despite the operational challenges.



The absence of mutual fund and insurance company holdings is notable. Domestic institutional investors have shown no interest in the stock, which typically signals concerns about governance, business quality, or growth sustainability. The lack of domestic institutional participation stands in stark contrast to the significant FII presence.



Non-institutional investors hold 45.92% of the company, with their stake increasing by 1.92 percentage points in Q2 FY26. The high proportion of retail and non-institutional holdings combined with the absence of promoters creates a shareholder base that may be more volatile and less committed to long-term value creation.



Stock Performance: Severe Underperformance Across Timeframes



The stock's price performance has been dismal across most timeframes, with particularly severe underperformance in the recent past. Trading at ₹5.27 as of November 14, 2025, the stock has declined 0.94% on the day and sits below all key moving averages, indicating weak technical momentum.































































Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week -3.66% +1.62% -5.28%
1 Month -4.01% +3.09% -7.10%
3 Months -22.84% +4.92% -27.76%
6 Months -19.54% +3.97% -23.51%
YTD -42.59% +8.22% -50.81%
1 Year -53.40% +9.00% -62.40%
2 Years +95.91% +30.23% +65.68%
3 Years +51.87% +37.22% +14.65%



The one-year return of -53.40% represents catastrophic value destruction, with the stock underperforming the Sensex by a massive 62.40 percentage points. This severe underperformance has accelerated in recent months, with the stock losing 22.84% in the past three months whilst the Sensex gained 4.92%.



The longer-term picture shows that the stock had delivered exceptional returns over two and three-year periods—up 95.91% and 51.87% respectively—significantly outperforming the Sensex. However, the recent collapse suggests that earlier gains may have been driven by speculative interest or temporary factors rather than sustainable business fundamentals.



The stock has also significantly underperformed its sector, with the NBFC index delivering 25.11% returns over the past year whilst Leading Leasing Finance declined 53.40%—an underperformance of 78.51 percentage points relative to sector peers. This sector-relative weakness indicates company-specific issues rather than broader sectoral headwinds.



Technical indicators uniformly point to continued weakness. The stock trades below all key moving averages (5-day, 20-day, 50-day, 100-day, and 200-day), with the overall technical trend classified as "Bearish" since September 8, 2025. MACD, Bollinger Bands, and KST indicators all flash bearish signals on weekly and monthly timeframes.



Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags Outweigh Growth Narrative



The investment case for Leading Leasing Finance rests on a few positives—impressive revenue growth, turnaround to profitability, and high institutional ownership—but is undermined by fundamental structural weaknesses that pose significant risks to investors.



The company's Mojo Score of 41/100 reflects a "Sell" recommendation, having been downgraded from "Hold" in August 2025. This scoring incorporates assessments across four key dimensions: valuation (Very Expensive), quality (Average), financial trend (Positive), and technicals (Bearish). The mixed signals create an unfavourable risk-reward profile.





KEY STRENGTHS



  • Impressive Revenue Growth: Net sales of ₹11.09 crores in Q2 FY26 represent 73.01% YoY growth, demonstrating strong business expansion

  • Return to Profitability: Net profit of ₹1.70 crores versus loss of ₹0.23 crores in Q2 FY25 shows operational turnaround

  • High Institutional Holdings: 54.08% FII ownership indicates foreign investor confidence in the business

  • Superior ROE vs Peers: 10.68% average ROE exceeds peer group average of approximately 4%

  • Long-term Track Record: 5-year sales CAGR of 33.37% demonstrates sustained growth trajectory

  • Positive Financial Trend: Current quarter classified as "Positive" trend after earlier challenges




KEY CONCERNS



  • Heavy Other Income Dependency: 75.94% of PBT derived from non-operating income raises sustainability concerns

  • Sequential Profit Collapse: Net profit declined 70.02% QoQ from ₹5.67 crores to ₹1.70 crores

  • Elevated Valuation: P/E of 30.74x represents 33.65% premium to NBFC sector average of 23x

  • High Financial Leverage: Debt-to-equity ratio of 3.99 creates vulnerability to credit and funding risks

  • Negative Operating Cash Flow: ₹380.00 crores cash consumed in FY25 operations

  • Zero Promoter Holding: Absence of promoter stake raises governance and strategic direction concerns

  • Severe Stock Underperformance: -53.40% return over past year, -78.51% vs NBFC sector

  • Bearish Technical Trend: Stock below all moving averages with uniformly negative technical indicators





Outlook: What to Watch



The investment outlook for Leading Leasing Finance hinges on the company's ability to address its structural weaknesses whilst maintaining growth momentum. Several factors will determine whether the recent turnaround proves sustainable or merely temporary.





POSITIVE CATALYSTS



  • Sustained Revenue Growth: Maintaining ₹11+ crore quarterly sales run rate

  • Reduced Other Income Dependency: Core lending profitability improvement

  • Asset Quality Stability: Low NPA levels and controlled provisioning

  • Improved Cash Generation: Positive operating cash flow in coming quarters




RED FLAGS TO MONITOR



  • Continued Other Income Volatility: Inability to generate consistent core profits

  • Further Sequential Profit Declines: Erosion of Q2 FY26 profitability levels

  • Rising Interest Costs: Margin compression from higher funding costs

  • FII Stake Reduction: Continued decline in institutional holdings

  • Technical Breakdown: Fall below ₹4.74 support (52-week low)






Investment Verdict


SELL

Score: 41/100


For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions. The heavy dependence on non-operating income, elevated valuation multiples, and severe technical weakness create an unfavourable risk-reward profile. The absence of promoter holding and lack of domestic institutional interest raise additional governance concerns.


For Existing Holders: Consider exiting on any relief rallies. The 70% sequential profit decline and unsustainable earnings quality suggest the recent recovery may not be durable. With the stock down 53.40% over the past year and trading below all moving averages, the technical picture reinforces the case for profit protection.


Fair Value Estimate: ₹3.80 (27.87% downside from current levels)


Rationale: Whilst revenue growth and institutional ownership provide some support, the fundamental weaknesses—particularly the 75.94% contribution of other income to profits, high leverage, and negative operating cash flow—outweigh the positives. The "Very Expensive" valuation grade and bearish technical trend further diminish the investment case.





Note- ROCE = (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)





⚠️ Investment Disclaimer


This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance does not guarantee future results, and all investments carry risk of loss.





{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News