Mac Charles (India) Q3 FY26: Revenue Surge Masks Mounting Debt Crisis

Feb 13 2026 10:25 AM IST
share
Share Via
Mac Charles (India) Ltd., the Bangalore-based hospitality company, reported a dramatic revenue surge in Q3 FY26 (October-December 2025), with net sales soaring to ₹32.73 crores—an extraordinary 1,081.59% year-on-year increase. However, this operational revival failed to translate into profitability, as the company plunged deeper into losses with a net deficit of ₹63.45 crores for the quarter, marking a 283.15% sequential deterioration. Trading at ₹617.00 with a market capitalisation of ₹808.33 crores, the stock remains trapped in a mildly bearish technical trend, reflecting investor scepticism about the company's ability to overcome its crushing debt burden of ₹1,044.84 crores.
Mac Charles (India) Q3 FY26: Revenue Surge Masks Mounting Debt Crisis
Net Profit (Q3 FY26)
-₹63.45 Cr
QoQ: ▼283.15% | YoY: ▼181.75%
Revenue (Q3 FY26)
₹32.73 Cr
QoQ: ▲37.81% | YoY: ▲1,081.59%
Operating Margin (Excl OI)
74.15%
QoQ: ▲0.89pp
Debt-to-Equity Ratio
15.38x
Critically High Leverage

The quarter's results present a paradox: whilst Mac Charles achieved its highest-ever quarterly revenue and maintained impressive operating margins above 74%, the company's financial structure remains fundamentally broken. Interest expenses of ₹31.63 crores—exceeding the company's entire revenue base from just a year ago—consumed any operational gains, pushing the company to its worst quarterly loss on record. For a micro-cap hospitality player with promoter holding at 73.78%, the question isn't about operational capability but financial sustainability.

Financial Performance: Operational Excellence Crushed by Debt Service

Mac Charles (India) Ltd. delivered a remarkable operational turnaround in Q3 FY26, with net sales reaching ₹32.73 crores—a 37.81% sequential increase from Q2 FY26's ₹23.75 crores and an astonishing 1,081.59% surge compared to Q3 FY25's meagre ₹2.77 crores. This dramatic revenue acceleration continued a trend established earlier in the fiscal year, with Q1 FY26 posting ₹21.80 crores and Q2 FY26 contributing ₹23.75 crores. On a nine-month basis (April-December 2025), the company generated ₹78.28 crores in revenue, compared to just ₹7.91 crores in the corresponding period of FY25—a staggering 889.51% year-on-year improvement.

Quarter Revenue (₹ Cr) QoQ Change YoY Change Operating Margin Net Profit (₹ Cr)
Dec'25 (Q3) ₹32.73 ▲37.81% ▲1,081.59% 74.15% -₹63.45
Sep'25 (Q2) ₹23.75 ▲8.94% ▲619.70% 73.26% -₹16.56
Jun'25 (Q1) ₹21.80 ▲1,035.42% ▲1,084.78% 60.78% -₹20.93
Mar'25 (Q4) ₹1.92 ▼30.69% -470.83% -₹36.51
Dec'24 (Q3) ₹2.77 ▼16.06% -264.62% -₹22.52
Sep'24 (Q2) ₹3.30 ▲79.35% -166.97% -₹23.86
Jun'24 (Q1) ₹1.84 -358.15% -₹22.89

The company's operating efficiency showed substantial improvement, with operating profit before depreciation, interest, and tax (excluding other income) reaching ₹24.27 crores in Q3 FY26—the highest in the company's recent history. Operating margins (excluding other income) stood at an impressive 74.15%, marginally higher than Q2 FY26's 73.26% and dramatically improved from the negative margins witnessed throughout FY25. Employee costs remained well-controlled at ₹4.01 crores, representing just 12.25% of revenue, down from 13.94% in Q2 FY26.

However, the company's debt burden proved insurmountable. Interest expenses for Q3 FY26 totalled ₹31.63 crores, effectively wiping out the entire operating profit and then some. On a nine-month basis (April-December 2025), interest costs accumulated to ₹94.72 crores—a 25.34% increase from the previous year's ₹75.62 crores. With depreciation adding another ₹5.38 crores in Q3 FY26, the company posted a loss before tax of ₹63.45 crores, translating to a dismal PAT margin of -193.86%.

Revenue (9M FY26)
₹78.28 Cr
YoY: ▲889.51%
Operating Profit Excl OI (Q3)
₹24.27 Cr
Highest on Record
Interest Expense (9M FY26)
₹94.72 Cr
YoY: ▲25.34%
PAT Margin (Q3 FY26)
-193.86%
Deeply Unprofitable

The Debt Trap: A Balance Sheet Under Siege

Mac Charles (India) Ltd.'s balance sheet reveals the fundamental challenge facing the company: a debt mountain that has grown relentlessly despite operational improvements. As of March 2025, the company carried long-term debt of ₹1,044.84 crores against shareholder funds of just ₹102.47 crores, resulting in a debt-to-equity ratio of 10.20 times. On a half-yearly basis (H1 FY26), this ratio deteriorated further to 16.21 times, indicating accelerating leverage.

The company's return on equity (ROE) stood at a catastrophic -148.45% as of the latest reporting period, reflecting the massive erosion of shareholder value. Return on capital employed (ROCE) fared marginally better at 0.31%, but remained deeply inadequate for a capital-intensive hospitality business. The average ROCE over the past five years stood at -0.79%, whilst average ROE registered at 0.0%—stark indicators of a company that has consistently destroyed rather than created value for its shareholders.

Critical Leverage Alert

Debt Crisis: With debt-to-equity at 15.38 times and interest expenses consuming 96.66% of operating profit in Q3 FY26, Mac Charles faces an existential financial challenge. The company's EBIT-to-interest coverage ratio averaged just 0.47 times over the past five years, meaning operating profits have consistently failed to cover even half of interest obligations.

Cash Flow Pressure: Operating cash flows remained negative at ₹112.00 crores in FY25, forcing the company to rely on financing activities (₹77.00 crores inflow) and asset sales (₹40.00 crores from investing activities) to meet obligations.

The company's investment portfolio showed significant growth, rising from ₹507.26 crores in March 2024 to ₹873.24 crores in March 2025—a 72.13% increase. However, current assets declined from ₹367.06 crores to ₹218.96 crores during the same period, suggesting potential liquidity constraints. Cash and cash equivalents on a half-yearly basis (H1 FY26) stood at just ₹45.29 crores—the lowest in recent quarters—raising concerns about the company's ability to service its massive debt obligations.

Industry Context: Recovery Amidst Structural Challenges

Mac Charles operates in India's Hotels & Resorts sector, which has witnessed uneven recovery patterns post-pandemic. The company's five-year sales growth of 12.69% appears respectable on the surface, but this figure masks the extreme volatility witnessed in recent years. Annual revenue collapsed from ₹30.00 crores in FY20 to ₹23.00 crores in FY21, further declining to ₹21.00 crores in FY22 and ₹11.00 crores in both FY23 and FY24, before recovering marginally to ₹9.00 crores in FY25.

The dramatic revenue surge in FY26 (₹78.28 crores in nine months) suggests the company may have resolved operational issues that plagued it for years. However, the five-year EBIT growth of -9.37% reveals that top-line improvements have not translated into sustainable profitability. The company's operating profit excluding other income remained negative at ₹28.00 crores in FY25, compared to ₹12.00 crores in positive operating profit in FY20.

Mac Charles's debt-to-EBITDA ratio shows "Negative Net Debt" classification in the data, which appears anomalous given the massive debt burden. This likely reflects the company's negative EBITDA in certain periods, rendering traditional leverage metrics meaningless. The net debt-to-equity ratio of 15.38 times places Mac Charles amongst the most leveraged companies in the hospitality sector, far exceeding prudent financing norms.

Peer Comparison: Valuation Disconnect

Mac Charles (India) Ltd.'s positioning within the Hotels & Resorts sector reveals significant valuation anomalies. With a market capitalisation of ₹808.33 crores, the company ranks sixth amongst its peer group, yet trades at a price-to-book value of 12.39 times—substantially higher than peers such as Benares Hotels (6.75x), Asian Hotels (6.62x), and Viceroy Hotels (3.92x).

Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE (%) Debt-to-Equity Div Yield (%)
Mac Charles (India) NA (Loss Making) 12.39x 0.0% 15.38x NA
Benares Hotels 28.05x 6.75x 18.64% -0.43x 0.26%
Asian Hotels (N) NA (Loss Making) 6.62x 0.0% 3.30x NA
Royal Orch. Hotel 22.83x 4.39x 17.56% 2.69x 0.65%
Viceroy Hotels 29.35x 3.92x 6.84% 0.15x NA
Advent Hotels 52.07x 1.35x 0.0% 0.00x NA

The comparison is particularly unfavourable when examining return metrics and leverage. Mac Charles reports 0.0% ROE compared to Benares Hotels' 18.64% and Royal Orchid Hotel's 17.56%. More critically, Mac Charles's debt-to-equity ratio of 15.38 times dwarfs the sector, with most peers maintaining ratios below 3.0 times. Benares Hotels even operates with negative net debt (-0.43x), indicating a net cash position.

The elevated price-to-book valuation of 12.39 times appears unjustified given the company's loss-making status and deteriorating financial metrics. Peer average P/BV stands around 4.60 times, suggesting Mac Charles trades at a 169% premium to sector norms despite fundamentally weaker financials. This valuation disconnect likely reflects low free float (promoter holding at 73.78%) and minimal institutional participation (just 0.02% institutional holdings), resulting in inefficient price discovery.

Valuation Analysis: Premium Without Justification

Mac Charles (India) Ltd. trades at ₹617.00 as of February 13, 2026, commanding a market capitalisation of ₹808.33 crores against a book value per share of ₹78.22. This translates to a price-to-book value of 12.39 times—a substantial premium that appears disconnected from underlying fundamentals. The company's P/E ratio remains "NA (Loss Making)" given consistent losses, whilst EV/EBITDA stands at an astronomical 126.45 times.

The company's valuation grade has been classified as "RISKY" since February 2023, with periodic oscillations between "Very Expensive" and "Risky" dating back to 2020. Current enterprise value metrics reveal severe overvaluation: EV-to-Sales of 35.94 times, EV-to-EBIT of 548.86 times, and EV-to-Capital Employed of 1.70 times. For context, profitable hospitality peers typically trade at EV/EBITDA multiples between 15-25 times, making Mac Charles's 126.45 times multiple appear grossly inflated.

P/E Ratio (TTM)
NA
Loss Making
Price-to-Book Value
12.39x
169% Premium to Peers
EV/EBITDA
126.45x
Extremely Expensive
Dividend Yield
NA
Last Dividend: Aug 2019

The stock's 52-week range spans ₹500.00 to ₹775.00, with the current price of ₹617.00 positioned 20.39% below the high and 23.40% above the low. This mid-range positioning offers no margin of safety given the deteriorating fundamentals. The company's dividend history provides no support for valuation, with the last dividend of ₹10 per share paid in August 2019—over six years ago. Dividend payout ratio stands at 0.0%, reflecting the company's inability to generate distributable profits.

Shareholding Pattern: Stable Promoter Base, Absent Institutions

Mac Charles (India) Ltd.'s shareholding structure has remained remarkably stable over the past five quarters, with promoter holding consistently at 73.78%. Embassy Property Developments Pvt Ltd holds 73.41% of the equity, whilst promoter Jitendra M Virwani maintains 0.37%. This concentrated ownership structure has shown zero change across Q3 FY26, Q2 FY26, Q1 FY26, Q4 FY25, and Q3 FY25.

Quarter Promoter % FII % MF % Insurance % Other DII % Non-Inst %
Dec'25 (Q3) 73.78% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% 26.20%
Sep'25 (Q2) 73.78% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% 26.20%
Jun'25 (Q1) 73.78% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% 26.20%
Mar'25 (Q4) 73.78% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% 26.20%
Dec'24 (Q3) 73.78% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% 26.20%

The complete absence of foreign institutional investors (0.00%), mutual funds (0.00%), and insurance companies (0.00%) signals severe institutional aversion to the stock. Other domestic institutional investors hold a negligible 0.02%, unchanged across all quarters. The remaining 26.20% free float consists entirely of non-institutional investors, suggesting a retail-dominated shareholder base with limited price discovery mechanisms.

This shareholding pattern presents both stability and concern. Whilst the unwavering promoter commitment at 73.78% provides governance continuity, the total institutional holding of just 0.02% reflects sophisticated investors' assessment of the company's risk profile. No mutual funds or insurance companies hold positions, indicating the stock fails to meet basic institutional investment criteria. The absence of pledged shares (0.0%) offers minor comfort, suggesting promoters aren't using their holdings as collateral for external borrowings.

Stock Performance: Volatility Without Direction

Mac Charles (India) Ltd.'s stock price performance reveals extreme volatility with limited directional conviction. Over the past year, the stock delivered 13.21% returns, outperforming the Sensex's 8.94% gain by 4.27 percentage points. However, this one-year performance masks significant turbulence across shorter timeframes and concerning longer-term trends.

Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week +9.47% -0.76% +10.23%
1 Month -3.29% -0.81% -2.48%
3 Months -11.86% -1.81% -10.05%
6 Months -14.89% +2.99% -17.88%
YTD (2026) -6.42% -2.67% -3.75%
1 Year +13.21% +8.94% +4.27%
2 Years +33.58% +15.92% +17.66%
3 Years +60.26% +37.26% +23.00%
5 Years +185.58% +60.93% +124.65%

The stock's recent trajectory shows deterioration, with negative returns across one-month (-3.29%), three-month (-11.86%), six-month (-14.89%), and year-to-date (-6.42%) periods. The six-month underperformance of 17.88 percentage points versus the Sensex is particularly concerning, suggesting investors are reassessing the company's prospects despite operational improvements. The stock trades below all key moving averages: 5-day MA (₹604.06), 20-day MA (₹601.96), 50-day MA (₹640.28), 100-day MA (₹668.49), and 200-day MA (₹650.21).

Technical indicators paint a bearish picture, with the overall trend classified as "MILDLY BEARISH" as of February 12, 2026. MACD shows bearish signals on both weekly and monthly timeframes, whilst RSI provides no clear signal weekly but turns bullish monthly. The stock's beta of 1.50 indicates 50% higher volatility than the market, with annualised volatility at 44.29%—classifying it as "HIGH RISK MEDIUM RETURN". Risk-adjusted returns of 0.30 compare unfavourably with the Sensex's 0.78, reflecting poor returns relative to volatility.

Delivery volumes provide mixed signals, with one-month delivery percentage declining 27.21% to 58.56% from the previous month's 84.28%. However, one-day delivery spiked 92.62% above the five-day average, suggesting episodic institutional or informed buying. The stock's outperformance versus the Hotels & Resorts sector (13.21% vs -6.34%) by 19.55 percentage points offers some consolation, though this likely reflects sector-wide weakness rather than Mac Charles's fundamental strength.

Investment Thesis: Operational Recovery Insufficient

Mac Charles (India) Ltd. presents a deeply conflicted investment narrative. The company's Mojo Score of 27/100 and "STRONG SELL" rating reflect fundamental concerns that overshadow recent operational improvements. The proprietary assessment framework reveals critical weaknesses across multiple dimensions.

Valuation Grade
RISKY
Very Expensive Multiples
Quality Assessment
BELOW AVERAGE
Weak Financial Strength
Financial Trend (Q3)
POSITIVE
Operational Improvement
Technical Trend
MILDLY BEARISH
Below All Key MAs

The quality assessment categorises Mac Charles as "BELOW AVERAGE" based on long-term financial performance. Key quality concerns include average ROCE of -0.79%, average ROE of 0.0%, weak EBIT-to-interest coverage of 0.47 times, and extreme leverage with net debt-to-equity at 15.38 times. Whilst the company demonstrates healthy long-term sales growth (12.69% CAGR) and maintains zero promoter pledging, these positives are insufficient to offset structural financial weaknesses.

The financial trend for Q3 FY26 shows "POSITIVE" momentum, with the quarter recording highest-ever net sales (₹32.73 crores), PBDIT (₹24.27 crores), and operating profit-to-sales ratio (74.15%). However, this positive trend is undermined by the highest quarterly loss (₹63.45 crores), growing interest burden (₹94.72 crores for nine months), and elevated debt-equity ratio (16.21 times on half-yearly basis). The company's score history shows recent deterioration, dropping from "SELL" (39 points on February 9, 2026) to "STRONG SELL" (27 points currently).

Key Strengths & Risk Factors

KEY STRENGTHS

  • Revenue Momentum: Extraordinary 1,081.59% YoY revenue growth in Q3 FY26, with nine-month FY26 revenue at ₹78.28 crores versus ₹7.91 crores in 9M FY25
  • Operating Efficiency: Operating margins (excl OI) improved to 74.15% in Q3 FY26 from negative margins throughout FY25
  • Promoter Commitment: Stable 73.78% promoter holding with zero pledging, indicating long-term commitment
  • Sector Outperformance: One-year stock return of 13.21% versus Hotels & Resorts sector decline of 6.34%
  • Cost Control: Employee costs maintained at 12.25% of revenue in Q3 FY26, demonstrating operational discipline

KEY CONCERNS

  • Crushing Debt Burden: Long-term debt of ₹1,044.84 crores with debt-to-equity at 15.38 times, amongst highest in sector
  • Interest Expense Crisis: Interest costs of ₹31.63 crores in Q3 FY26 exceed operating profit, with 9M FY26 interest at ₹94.72 crores
  • Persistent Losses: Net loss of ₹63.45 crores in Q3 FY26, with cumulative 9M FY26 losses at ₹100.94 crores
  • Negative Cash Generation: Operating cash flow of -₹112.00 crores in FY25, indicating inability to self-fund operations
  • ROE Collapse: Return on equity at -148.45%, with average ROE at 0.0% over five years
  • Valuation Disconnect: P/BV of 12.39x versus peer average of ~4.6x, with EV/EBITDA at 126.45x
  • Zero Institutional Interest: No FII, MF, or insurance holdings; total institutional participation at 0.02%

Outlook: What to Watch

POSITIVE CATALYSTS

  • Sustained revenue growth above ₹25 crores quarterly through FY26
  • Debt restructuring or refinancing at lower interest rates
  • Operating margins sustaining above 70% for three consecutive quarters
  • Institutional investor entry or mutual fund holdings crossing 1%
  • Asset monetisation reducing net debt below ₹800 crores

RED FLAGS

  • Quarterly revenue falling below ₹20 crores, indicating operational setback
  • Interest coverage ratio remaining below 1.0x for two more quarters
  • Further increase in debt-to-equity ratio beyond 17.0 times
  • Operating cash flow remaining negative in FY26
  • Promoter stake dilution or any pledging of shares
"Mac Charles has achieved operational excellence but remains imprisoned by its debt structure—a classic case where strong business performance cannot overcome balance sheet fragility."

The path forward for Mac Charles (India) Ltd. requires aggressive debt reduction through asset sales, equity infusion, or operational cash flow generation. Without addressing the ₹1,044.84 crore debt burden, even sustained revenue growth and margin expansion will prove insufficient to achieve profitability. The company's debtors turnover ratio of 22.33 times (highest on record) demonstrates operational efficiency, but this cannot compensate for interest expenses that exceed operating profits.

For the company to reach breakeven, assuming current operating margins of 74%, it would need quarterly revenue of approximately ₹43-45 crores to cover interest and depreciation costs. Q3 FY26's revenue of ₹32.73 crores, whilst impressive, falls short of this threshold. The investment case hinges entirely on whether management can execute a credible debt reduction strategy whilst maintaining revenue momentum—a challenging dual mandate with limited margin for error.

The Verdict: Avoid Despite Operational Revival

STRONG SELL

Score: 27/100

For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiation. Whilst operational metrics show dramatic improvement, the company's debt burden of ₹1,044.84 crores creates an insurmountable profitability challenge. Interest expenses alone exceed operating profits, rendering the equity value questionable. The absence of institutional investors and "RISKY" valuation grade signal fundamental concerns that outweigh recent revenue growth.

For Existing Holders: Consider exit on any price strength. The stock's 20.39% decline from 52-week highs provides limited downside cushion, whilst the debt-to-equity ratio of 15.38 times poses existential risk. Without visible debt restructuring plans or equity infusion, continued losses will erode shareholder value. The technical trend remains mildly bearish with the stock trading below all key moving averages.

Fair Value Estimate: ₹350-400 (43% downside risk from current price of ₹617), based on book value of ₹78.22 and assuming 4.5-5.0x P/BV multiple aligned with profitable hospitality peers. Current 12.39x P/BV appears unjustified given loss-making status and negative ROE of -148.45%.

Note— ROCE = (EBIT - Other Income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)

⚠️ Investment Disclaimer

This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of any affiliated organisations.

{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News