Maharashtra Seamless Q2 FY26: Profit Plunges 43% as Margin Pressures Mount

Nov 04 2025 08:17 PM IST
share
Share Via
Maharashtra Seamless Ltd., the flagship seamless pipe manufacturer of the DP Jindal Group, reported a sharp 43.08% year-on-year decline in consolidated net profit to ₹125.26 crores for Q2 FY26, down from ₹220.08 crores in the corresponding quarter last year. The ₹7,706-crore market capitalisation company faced significant margin compression despite stable revenue, with the stock trading at ₹574.30 as of November 04, 2025, down 1.08% on the day and hovering near its 52-week low of ₹567.00.





Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

₹125.26 Cr

▼ 43.08% YoY



Revenue (Q2 FY26)

₹1,158.67 Cr

▼ 10.31% YoY



Operating Margin

10.59%

Lowest in 8 Quarters



ROE (Latest)

12.26%

Below Average




The quarter's results reveal a company grappling with operational headwinds despite maintaining a strong balance sheet. Net sales of ₹1,158.67 crores represented a marginal 1.17% sequential improvement over Q1 FY26 but reflected a concerning 10.31% year-on-year decline. More troubling was the severe margin compression, with operating profit margin (excluding other income) plummeting to 10.59% from 17.88% a year earlier—the lowest level recorded in the past eight quarters.



The company's reliance on non-operating income became particularly pronounced during the quarter, with other income of ₹75.76 crores accounting for 44.79% of profit before tax. This heavy dependence on treasury income rather than core operations raises questions about the sustainability of earnings quality and highlights the challenging operating environment facing the seamless pipe manufacturer.



Financial Performance: Margin Erosion Undermines Top-Line Stability



Maharashtra Seamless's Q2 FY26 financial performance presents a concerning picture of profitability deterioration despite relatively stable revenue trends. Net sales of ₹1,158.67 crores showed minimal sequential growth of 1.17% quarter-on-quarter but declined 10.31% year-on-year, indicating softening demand conditions in the seamless pipe segment. The company's total expenditure management proved inadequate to offset pricing pressures, resulting in severe margin compression across all profitability metrics.

















































































Quarter Net Sales (₹ Cr) QoQ % Net Profit (₹ Cr) YoY % Operating Margin % PAT Margin %
Sep'25 1,158.67 +1.17% 125.26 -43.08% 10.59% 10.81%
Jun'25 1,145.27 -19.22% 230.32 +78.17% 14.71% 20.11%
Mar'25 1,417.77 +0.69% 242.04 +10.84% 20.11% 17.09%
Dec'24 1,408.11 +9.00% 186.07 19.86% 13.21%
Sep'24 1,291.81 +12.24% 220.08 17.88% 17.04%
Jun'24 1,150.98 -5.26% 129.27 10.81% 11.19%
Mar'24 1,214.90 218.37 22.64% 17.97%



Operating profit before depreciation, interest, tax and other income (PBDIT excluding OI) crashed to ₹122.67 crores from ₹231.04 crores year-on-year, representing a 46.90% decline. The operating margin contraction of 731 basis points year-on-year to 10.59% marks the weakest performance since at least March 2024. Profit before tax of ₹169.14 crores declined 42.02% year-on-year, whilst PAT margin compressed to 10.81% from 17.04% in the year-ago quarter.



The sequential comparison offers little comfort. Whilst revenue improved marginally from Q1 FY26's ₹1,145.27 crores, net profit plummeted 45.61% quarter-on-quarter from ₹230.32 crores. This dramatic sequential deterioration suggests intensifying competitive pressures or operational inefficiencies that emerged specifically during the September quarter. The company's gross profit margin of 17.09% in Q2 FY26 represents a significant decline from 24.85% in the year-ago period, indicating substantial pricing pressure or unfavourable product mix shifts.





Net Sales (Q2 FY26)

₹1,158.67 Cr

+1.17% QoQ | -10.31% YoY



Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

₹125.26 Cr

-45.61% QoQ | -43.08% YoY



Operating Margin (Excl OI)

10.59%

vs 17.88% YoY



PAT Margin

10.81%

vs 17.04% YoY




Operational Challenges: Capital Efficiency Deteriorates



The operational metrics for Maharashtra Seamless reveal concerning trends in capital efficiency and return generation. The company's latest return on equity (ROE) of 12.26% represents a significant deterioration from its five-year average of 14.30%, itself a relatively modest figure compared to industry standards. This declining ROE trajectory signals weakening profitability relative to shareholder capital employed, a particularly worrying development given the company's virtually debt-free balance sheet that should theoretically enable superior returns.



Return on capital employed (ROCE) tells a more nuanced story. The latest ROCE of 20.02% exceeds the five-year average of 16.23%, suggesting improved capital productivity over the longer term. However, this metric's strength is partially undermined by the company's negative net debt position (net cash of ₹0.35 times equity), which inflates ROCE by reducing the capital employed denominator. The five-year sales growth of 16.93% and EBIT growth of 17.21% demonstrate historical expansion capability, but current quarter trends raise questions about sustainability.




Critical Concern: Earnings Quality Deterioration


Other income dependency: Non-operating income of ₹75.76 crores constituted 44.79% of profit before tax in Q2 FY26, indicating the company's profits are increasingly reliant on treasury income rather than core manufacturing operations. Operating profit before other income stood at merely ₹93.38 crores—the lowest level in recent quarters—raising serious questions about the sustainability of reported earnings.




The balance sheet remains a source of strength amidst operational challenges. Shareholder funds stood at ₹6,339.94 crores as of March 2025, with long-term debt of just ₹0.10 crores, making Maharashtra Seamless essentially a zero-debt company. This financial flexibility provides a cushion during difficult operating periods and positions the company to weather cyclical downturns. However, the company's inability to convert this strong balance sheet position into superior operating returns raises questions about management's capital allocation effectiveness.



Working capital management showed stress during FY25, with cash flow from operations of ₹609.00 crores significantly trailing the previous year's ₹1,041.00 crores, primarily due to adverse working capital changes of ₹185.00 crores. The company's sales to capital employed ratio of 0.87 times suggests moderate asset turnover efficiency, though this metric has remained relatively stable over the five-year period.



Industry Context: Steel Sector Headwinds Intensify



Maharashtra Seamless's struggles must be viewed within the broader context of challenging conditions facing India's steel products sector. The company's 7.37% decline in stock price over the past year significantly underperformed the Iron & Steel Products sector's 14.73% gain, resulting in a stark 22.10 percentage point underperformance versus peers. This relative weakness suggests company-specific challenges beyond sector-wide headwinds.



The seamless pipe segment faces particular pressure from fluctuating raw material costs, competitive intensity from both domestic and imported products, and cyclical demand patterns tied to oil & gas, infrastructure, and industrial capital expenditure. Maharashtra Seamless's margin compression appears more severe than typical sector trends, suggesting either adverse product mix shifts, pricing discipline erosion, or operational inefficiencies specific to the company's manufacturing footprint.




Market Positioning Challenge


Despite being the flagship company of the diversified DP Jindal Group with access to world-renowned CPE technology for seamless pipe manufacturing, Maharashtra Seamless has struggled to maintain pricing power and margin stability. The company's market capitalisation of ₹7,706 crores positions it as a mid-sized player in the steel products space, potentially limiting economies of scale advantages versus larger integrated steel producers who can leverage vertical integration benefits.




The company's diversification into ERW pipes (since 2000) and renewable power generation provides some business model diversification, though the contribution from these segments to overall profitability remains unclear from available financial data. The rig operations business adds further diversification but also complexity to the operational structure. This multi-segment approach may be diluting management focus during a period when core seamless pipe operations require intensive attention to restore margin health.



Peer Comparison: Valuation Discount Reflects Operational Concerns



Maharashtra Seamless trades at a significant valuation discount to its peer group, reflecting market concerns about operational performance and growth prospects. The company's price-to-earnings ratio of 8.76 times compares favourably to the industry average P/E of 32 times, suggesting either a value opportunity or justified scepticism about earnings sustainability.

































































Company P/E Ratio (TTM) Price/Book ROE % Div Yield % Debt/Equity
Mah. Seamless 8.76 1.21 14.30 1.74 -0.35
Godawari Power 25.20 3.80 26.83 0.36 -0.08
Ratnamani Metals 29.97 4.70 16.53 0.57 -0.07
Usha Martin 35.73 5.25 15.54 0.63 0.05
Gallantt Ispat 27.67 4.80 12.36 0.21 0.03
Jindal Saw 7.94 0.96 10.03 1.17 0.36



The company's price-to-book ratio of 1.21 times stands well below the peer average of approximately 3.9 times, reflecting market scepticism about the company's ability to generate superior returns on its ₹6,339.94 crores of shareholder equity. This valuation gap appears partially justified given Maharashtra Seamless's ROE of 14.30% trails the peer average and significantly lags leaders like Godawari Power (26.83% ROE).



However, the company does command certain advantages over its peer set. Its dividend yield of 1.74% exceeds most competitors, supported by a conservative payout ratio of 14.09% that provides room for dividend growth or retention for growth investments. The negative debt-to-equity ratio of -0.35 (indicating net cash position) represents one of the strongest balance sheets in the peer group, matched only by Godawari Power and Ratnamani Metals.



The valuation discount appears most pronounced when comparing Maharashtra Seamless's P/E of 8.76 times to peers like Usha Martin (35.73x) and Ratnamani Metals (29.97x). This 3-4x valuation gap suggests the market assigns significantly lower earnings quality or growth expectations to Maharashtra Seamless compared to these competitors. Only Jindal Saw trades at a comparable P/E of 7.94 times, though Jindal Saw's higher leverage (0.36 debt-to-equity) and lower ROE (10.03%) make it a less attractive comparable.



Valuation Analysis: Attractive Entry Point or Value Trap?



Maharashtra Seamless currently trades at valuation multiples that appear superficially attractive but warrant careful scrutiny given deteriorating operational trends. At ₹574.30 per share, the stock trades at a P/E ratio of 8.76 times trailing twelve-month earnings, representing a 72.6% discount to the industry P/E of 32 times. The price-to-book ratio of 1.21 times compares to a book value per share of ₹472.82, implying only a modest premium to net asset value.





P/E Ratio (TTM)

8.76x

vs Industry 32x



Price to Book

1.21x

Book Value: ₹472.82



EV/EBITDA

5.65x

Modest Multiple



Dividend Yield

1.74%

₹10 per share




The enterprise value to EBITDA multiple of 5.65 times appears reasonable for a cyclical manufacturing business, though this metric is distorted by the company's net cash position. The EV to sales ratio of 1.04 times suggests the market values the business at approximately one year's revenue, a modest multiple that typically indicates either cyclical trough valuations or structural concerns about profitability sustainability.



However, the PEG ratio of 8.76 raises a significant red flag. This elevated PEG ratio (typically, values above 2 suggest overvaluation relative to growth) indicates the market is paying a high price relative to expected earnings growth, despite the seemingly attractive absolute P/E multiple. This disconnect suggests either that historical growth rates are unlikely to continue or that near-term earnings face significant headwinds.




Valuation Grade: Attractive but Risky


Whilst Maharashtra Seamless's valuation grade has been marked as "Attractive" since October 1, 2025 (having oscillated between Fair, Attractive, and Expensive over recent months), this attractive valuation must be weighed against deteriorating fundamentals. The stock's 29.45% decline from its 52-week high of ₹814.00 and proximity to the 52-week low of ₹567.00 suggests the market has already re-rated the stock downward to reflect operational challenges.




The dividend yield of 1.74% provides some downside protection and income cushion, with the latest dividend of ₹10 per share declared ex-dividend on August 14, 2025. The conservative payout ratio of 14.09% suggests dividend sustainability even if earnings face further pressure, though dividend growth prospects appear limited given current profitability trends.



Shareholding Pattern: Promoters Increase Stake Amidst Challenges



The shareholding pattern for Maharashtra Seamless reveals interesting dynamics, with promoters demonstrating confidence through incremental stake increases even as operational performance deteriorated. Promoter holding increased to 69.05% in September 2025 from 68.04% a year earlier, with the most recent quarter showing an 18 basis point sequential increase from 68.87% in June 2025.































































Quarter Promoter % QoQ Change FII % MF % Insurance % DII %
Sep'25 69.05 +0.18 9.86 2.90 0.25 0.49
Jun'25 68.87 +0.01 10.42 3.15 0.24 0.69
Mar'25 68.86 +0.79 9.63 3.06 0.21 0.70
Dec'24 68.07 +0.03 9.12 3.02 0.17 0.66
Sep'24 68.04 7.97 3.56 0.15 0.66



The promoter group's stake increase of 101 basis points over the past year signals management confidence in the business's long-term prospects, despite near-term operational challenges. The promoter group comprises multiple entities within the DP Jindal family structure, with Odd & Even Trades & Finance Limited (17.76%) and Stable Trading Co Limited (17.71%) representing the largest individual holdings. Importantly, there is zero promoter pledging, indicating the promoter group's strong financial position and lack of leverage-related concerns.



Foreign institutional investor (FII) holding showed volatility, increasing to 9.86% in September 2025 from 7.97% a year earlier, though declining 56 basis points sequentially from 10.42% in June 2025. This recent FII selling during the September quarter—coinciding with the sharp profit decline—suggests sophisticated investors reduced exposure as operational deterioration became apparent. The presence of 175 FII holders indicates reasonably broad foreign institutional interest despite recent selling.



Mutual fund holding declined to 2.90% in September 2025 from 3.56% a year earlier, with 20 mutual fund schemes holding positions. This gradual reduction in domestic institutional ownership over the past year reflects waning conviction amongst professional investors about the company's near-term prospects. Insurance company holdings remained minimal at 0.25%, whilst other domestic institutional investors (DIIs) held 0.49%, down from 0.69% in the previous quarter.



The non-institutional shareholding (retail and non-institutional investors) increased to 17.47% from 16.63% sequentially, suggesting retail investors may be accumulating shares attracted by the valuation discount, even as institutional investors reduce positions. This divergence between retail accumulation and institutional reduction warrants caution, as institutional investors typically have superior information access and analytical resources.



Stock Performance: Significant Underperformance Across Timeframes



Maharashtra Seamless's stock performance has deteriorated markedly across most relevant timeframes, with particularly severe underperformance versus both the broader market and its sector peers. The stock's 7.37% decline over the past year significantly lagged the Sensex's 5.94% gain, resulting in negative alpha of 13.31 percentage points. More concerning, the stock underperformed its Iron & Steel Products sector by 22.10 percentage points, with the sector gaining 14.73% whilst Maharashtra Seamless declined 7.37%.















































































Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha Assessment
1 Week +0.06% -1.38% +1.44% Outperformance
1 Month -4.36% +2.77% -7.13% Significant lag
3 Months -14.92% +3.01% -17.93% Sharp underperformance
6 Months -11.60% +3.67% -15.27% Continued weakness
YTD -17.83% +6.81% -24.64% Severe underperformance
1 Year -7.37% +5.94% -13.31% Negative alpha
2 Years -21.98% +29.67% -51.65% Dramatic lag
3 Years +43.36% +36.93% +6.43% Modest outperformance
5 Years +417.62% +105.48% +312.14% Strong long-term gains



The near-term performance metrics paint an increasingly bearish picture. The stock declined 4.36% over the past month whilst the Sensex gained 2.77%, resulting in 7.13 percentage points of underperformance. The three-month return of -14.92% versus the Sensex's +3.01% gain translates to negative alpha of 17.93 percentage points. Year-to-date, the stock has fallen 17.83% whilst the Sensex rallied 6.81%, producing a stark 24.64 percentage point underperformance.



The technical picture has deteriorated significantly, with the stock trading below all major moving averages. The current price of ₹574.30 sits below the 5-day moving average (₹574.80), 20-day MA (₹578.76), 50-day MA (₹610.88), 100-day MA (₹657.06), and 200-day MA (₹659.21). This alignment of moving averages in descending order typically signals a strong downtrend with significant overhead resistance at multiple levels.




Technical Breakdown: Bearish Trend Firmly Established


The stock entered a bearish technical trend on September 16, 2025, at ₹630, and has since declined 8.84% to current levels near the 52-week low of ₹567.00. With the stock 29.45% below its 52-week high of ₹814.00 and multiple technical indicators (MACD, RSI, Bollinger Bands, KST) flashing bearish or mildly bearish signals, the technical setup offers little support for near-term recovery absent a fundamental catalyst.




The longer-term performance provides some historical context for current struggles. Over three years, the stock has gained 43.36% versus the Sensex's 36.93%, producing positive alpha of 6.43 percentage points. The five-year return of 417.62% significantly outpaced the Sensex's 105.48% gain, demonstrating the stock's historical ability to generate substantial wealth during favourable operating conditions. However, this strong long-term track record makes the recent two-year decline of 21.98% (versus Sensex gain of 29.67%) particularly concerning, suggesting a structural shift in the business rather than temporary cyclical weakness.



The stock's beta of 1.35 indicates higher volatility than the broader market, with the stock's 36.91% annual volatility significantly exceeding the Sensex's 12.45% volatility. This high beta classification means the stock tends to amplify market movements in both directions, making it particularly vulnerable during market downturns. The risk-adjusted return of -0.20 over the past year (versus the Sensex's +0.48) places the stock in the "HIGH RISK LOW RETURN" category—an unfavourable combination for risk-conscious investors.



Investment Thesis: Quality Company Facing Cyclical Trough



Maharashtra Seamless presents a complex investment case characterised by attractive valuation metrics offset by deteriorating operational performance and negative momentum. The company's overall quality grade of "Good" reflects its strong long-term financial performance, zero-debt balance sheet, and absence of corporate governance red flags such as promoter pledging. However, this quality foundation is currently undermined by a "Negative" financial trend designation, driven by the sharp profit decline, margin compression, and concerning earnings quality indicators in recent quarters.





Valuation Grade

Attractive

P/E: 8.76x vs Industry 32x



Quality Grade

Good

Zero debt, No pledging



Financial Trend

Negative

PAT down 43% YoY



Technical Trend

Bearish

Below all key MAs




The bearish technical trend, established since September 16, 2025, adds another layer of concern for potential investors. With the stock trading below all major moving averages and multiple technical indicators signalling bearish momentum, the path of least resistance appears to be lower in the near term. The stock's proximity to its 52-week low of ₹567.00 provides minimal technical support, whilst substantial overhead resistance exists at the 20-day MA (₹578.76) and beyond.




"The fundamental challenge facing Maharashtra Seamless is whether the current margin compression represents temporary cyclical weakness or a more permanent erosion of competitive positioning in the seamless pipe market."


The company's proprietary Mojo Score of 36 out of 100 translates to a "SELL" rating, having deteriorated from "HOLD" territory as recently as September 4, 2025. This downgrade reflects the confluence of negative factors: deteriorating financial trends, bearish technical setup, and concerning earnings quality despite attractive absolute valuation multiples. The score improvement from 44 to current levels suggests incremental deterioration in the investment case over recent months.



Key Strengths & Risk Factors





KEY STRENGTHS



  • Fortress Balance Sheet: Zero net debt with ₹6,339.94 crores shareholder equity and negative debt-to-equity of -0.35, providing significant financial flexibility

  • Attractive Valuation: P/E of 8.76x represents 72.6% discount to industry average of 32x, with P/BV of 1.21x near book value

  • Promoter Confidence: Promoter holding increased to 69.05% with zero pledging, demonstrating management's long-term conviction

  • Dividend Income: 1.74% dividend yield with conservative 14.09% payout ratio provides income cushion and room for future increases

  • Quality Fundamentals: "Good" quality grade based on long-term financial performance, strong interest coverage of 100x, and low historical debt

  • Diversified Business: Presence in seamless pipes, ERW pipes, renewable power, and rig operations provides some revenue diversification

  • Long-term Track Record: Five-year returns of 417.62% demonstrate historical wealth creation capability during favourable cycles




KEY CONCERNS



  • Severe Margin Compression: Operating margin collapsed to 10.59% from 17.88% YoY—lowest in 8 quarters—indicating fundamental profitability challenges

  • Profit Collapse: Net profit plunged 43.08% YoY and 45.61% QoQ, with earnings quality deteriorating sharply

  • Excessive Other Income Dependency: Other income constituted 44.79% of PBT in Q2 FY26, masking weak core operational performance

  • Weak Capital Efficiency: ROE of 12.26% below average and declining, suggesting inability to generate adequate returns on shareholder capital

  • Technical Breakdown: Bearish trend since September 16, 2025, trading below all major moving averages with multiple bearish indicators

  • Institutional Selling: FII and MF holdings declining, with sophisticated investors reducing exposure as fundamentals deteriorate

  • Sector Underperformance: Stock declined 7.37% versus sector gain of 14.73%, indicating company-specific challenges beyond sector trends

  • High PEG Ratio: PEG of 8.76 suggests market paying high price relative to growth despite low absolute P/E

  • High Volatility: Beta of 1.35 and 36.91% volatility create amplified downside risk during market corrections





Outlook: What to Watch in Coming Quarters





POSITIVE CATALYSTS



  • Margin Recovery: Any signs of operating margin stabilisation above 15% would signal improving pricing power or cost management

  • Revenue Growth Resumption: Sequential revenue growth of 5%+ would indicate demand recovery in seamless pipe segment

  • Reduced Other Income Dependency: Other income falling below 25% of PBT would improve earnings quality perception

  • Institutional Re-entry: FII or MF buying would signal improving institutional confidence in turnaround prospects

  • Technical Reversal: Stock reclaiming 20-day and 50-day moving averages could trigger momentum-based buying




RED FLAGS TO MONITOR



  • Further Margin Erosion: Operating margins falling below 10% would signal severe competitive or structural challenges

  • Continued Profit Decline: Another quarter of 30%+ YoY profit decline would confirm deteriorating trend rather than one-off weakness

  • Working Capital Stress: Significant working capital build-up or cash flow deterioration would pressure the balance sheet

  • Promoter Selling: Any reduction in promoter stake would contradict current confidence signal and raise governance concerns

  • Break Below 52-Week Low: Decisive break below ₹567 on high volume would open door to further technical deterioration





The forward outlook for Maharashtra Seamless hinges critically on management's ability to arrest the margin decline and restore operational profitability to historical levels. The company's strong balance sheet provides time and resources to navigate the current challenges, but the persistence of weak operating performance through multiple quarters suggests these may not be temporary cyclical issues. Investors should closely monitor Q3 FY26 results for early signs of stabilisation or continued deterioration.



From a sector perspective, any improvement in steel prices, infrastructure spending, or oil & gas capital expenditure could provide tailwinds for demand recovery. However, Maharashtra Seamless's significant underperformance versus sector peers suggests company-specific execution issues that may not automatically resolve even if sector conditions improve. The management's strategic response to current challenges—whether through cost restructuring, product mix optimisation, or capacity rationalisation—will be critical to watch in coming quarters.




The Verdict: Avoid Until Operational Stability Returns


SELL

Score: 36/100


For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions despite attractive valuation multiples. The combination of deteriorating financial trends, severe margin compression, weak earnings quality, and bearish technical setup creates an unfavourable risk-reward profile. Wait for at least two consecutive quarters of margin stabilisation and profit growth before considering entry.


For Existing Holders: Consider reducing positions or exiting entirely, particularly for those sitting on long-term gains. The 43% profit decline and lowest operating margins in 8 quarters signal fundamental challenges that may take multiple quarters to resolve. The strong balance sheet provides some downside protection, but opportunity cost of holding through an extended recovery period may be significant.


Fair Value Estimate: ₹520-550 (9-14% downside risk from current levels) based on normalised earnings of ₹60-65 per share and 8-9x P/E multiple appropriate for current quality and growth profile. Upside scenario of ₹650-700 requires demonstrated margin recovery to 16-18% levels sustained over 2-3 quarters.





Note: ROCE = (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)





⚠️ Investment Disclaimer


This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. All investments carry risk, including the potential loss of principal.





{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News