The quarter's results present a tale of two narratives. Whilst the headline profit figure appears encouraging on a sequential basis, a deeper examination reveals structural challenges. Net sales declined 3.14% quarter-on-quarter to ₹184.02 crores, marking a concerning 10.20% drop from the previous four-quarter average. More troubling is the operating profit (excluding other income) of just ₹6.87 crores, representing a wafer-thin margin of 3.73%—the lowest in recent quarters and a dramatic fall from the 8.87% achieved in December 2024.
What salvaged the quarter's profitability was an extraordinary surge in other income to ₹17.04 crores, which constituted a staggering 82.20% of profit before tax. This heavy reliance on non-operating income raises questions about the sustainability of earnings and the underlying health of core business operations. The company's profit before tax of ₹20.73 crores included just ₹3.69 crores from operations, highlighting the precarious nature of current profitability.
| Quarter | Net Sales (₹ Cr) | QoQ Change | Operating Profit (₹ Cr) | Margin % | Net Profit (₹ Cr) | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec'25 | 184.02 | -3.14% | 6.87 | 3.73% | 14.56 | +13.75% |
| Sep'25 | 189.99 | +9.57% | 7.00 | 3.68% | 10.99 | -24.88% |
| Jun'25 | 173.39 | -35.44% | 9.94 | 5.73% | 15.00 | -11.97% |
| Mar'25 | 268.56 | +42.93% | 14.61 | 5.44% | 11.51 | — |
| Dec'24 | 187.90 | +10.88% | 16.67 | 8.87% | 12.80 | — |
| Sep'24 | 169.47 | +61.20% | 8.79 | 5.19% | 14.63 | — |
| Jun'24 | 105.13 | — | 14.10 | 13.41% | 17.04 | — |
Financial Performance: Margin Erosion Overshadows Revenue Stability
The quarter-on-quarter revenue decline of 3.14% to ₹184.02 crores, whilst modest in absolute terms, continues a pattern of volatility that has characterised Manaksia's recent performance. The year-on-year decline of 2.06% suggests the company is struggling to capture growth momentum in its core markets. More concerning is the sharp deterioration in operating margins, which compressed to 3.73% from 5.73% in the previous quarter and 8.87% in the year-ago period.
Breaking down the profitability cascade, operating profit before depreciation, interest, tax, and other income (PBDIT excluding OI) stood at a meagre ₹6.87 crores, barely covering fixed costs. Interest expenses more than doubled sequentially to ₹1.60 crores from ₹0.70 crores, though they remain substantially lower than the ₹4.88 crores incurred in December 2024. Depreciation remained stable at ₹1.59 crores, reflecting a largely steady fixed asset base.
The tax rate for the quarter stood at 29.86%, slightly below the previous quarter's 32.06% but within the company's historical range. The effective tax rate has averaged around 31% over recent periods, indicating stable tax management. However, the absolute tax outgo of ₹6.19 crores on a profit before tax of ₹20.73 crores underscores the limited operational earnings base once other income is stripped out.
On a nine-month basis for FY26 (April-December 2025), Manaksia reported consolidated net sales of ₹547.40 crores and net profit of ₹40.55 crores, translating to a PAT margin of 7.41%. This compares to the full-year FY25 performance, where the company generated ₹701.00 crores in sales with ₹78.00 crores in profit, representing an 11.10% margin. The margin compression evident in the current fiscal year signals deteriorating operational efficiency.
Critical Concern: Unsustainable Profit Composition
Other income of ₹17.04 crores represented 82.20% of Q3 FY26 profit before tax, raising serious questions about earnings quality. Core operational profit before other income stood at just ₹3.69 crores—the lowest in recent quarters. This heavy dependence on non-operating income is unsustainable and masks underlying business weakness. Investors should closely monitor whether this pattern persists in Q4 FY26.
Operational Challenges: Return Ratios Under Pressure
Manaksia's return metrics paint a concerning picture of capital efficiency deterioration. Return on equity (ROE) stands at 12.76% on an average basis, though the latest reported ROE has declined to 8.28%—a substantial drop that reflects the compression in profitability relative to shareholder equity. Whilst the five-year average ROE of 12.76% might appear reasonable for the iron and steel products sector, the downward trajectory is worrying.
More striking is the return on capital employed (ROCE), which averaged an impressive 44.41% over the past five years but has plummeted to just 14.36% in the latest period. The half-yearly ROCE for FY26 hit a concerning low of 12.47%, marking the weakest capital efficiency in recent memory. This dramatic decline from historical levels suggests either deteriorating asset productivity or a significant increase in capital employed without commensurate profit generation.
The company's balance sheet as of March 2025 shows shareholder funds of ₹572.21 crores against fixed assets of just ₹45.29 crores, indicating a capital-light business model. Current assets stood at ₹648.81 crores, comprising largely working capital. The company operates with minimal debt—long-term borrowings are zero, and the net debt-to-equity ratio averages -0.53, indicating Manaksia is a net cash company. This strong balance sheet provides financial flexibility but also raises questions about capital deployment efficiency given the declining returns.
Working capital management appears stable, with current liabilities of ₹103.22 crores as of March 2025, down from ₹133.62 crores the previous year. Trade payables stood at ₹51.63 crores, more than doubling from ₹21.80 crores, suggesting the company may be stretching payment terms to preserve cash. The sales-to-capital-employed ratio averages 1.05x, indicating modest asset turnover.
Balance Sheet Strength Amid Operational Weakness
Despite operational challenges, Manaksia maintains a fortress balance sheet with zero long-term debt and a net cash position. The company's debt-to-EBITDA ratio averages just 0.56x, and EBIT interest coverage stands at a healthy 9.38x. However, this financial strength has not translated into superior returns, with ROCE collapsing from 44% to 14% and ROE declining to 8.28%. The company needs to demonstrate better capital allocation to justify its equity base of ₹572 crores.
Industry Context: Underperforming in a Resilient Sector
The Indian iron and steel products sector has demonstrated considerable resilience over the past year, with the industry benchmark delivering returns of 72.17% compared to Manaksia's dismal -21.09% performance. This staggering underperformance of 93.26 percentage points highlights company-specific challenges rather than sector-wide headwinds. Whilst peers have capitalised on infrastructure spending and manufacturing growth, Manaksia has struggled to translate these favourable tailwinds into operational success.
The company's five-year sales growth of -0.43% annually and EBIT growth of -3.79% stand in stark contrast to the sector's overall expansion. This suggests Manaksia is losing market share or facing structural challenges in its Nigerian operations, which constitute a significant portion of its business through subsidiaries producing galvanised steel, prepainted profiled sheets, colour-coated aluminium coils, metal closures, and paper packaging products.
Manaksia's current financial trend is classified as "Negative" by proprietary analysis, with multiple red flags including operating profit at multi-quarter lows, declining sales versus the four-quarter average, and the concerning reliance on other income. The company's quality grade remains "Average," reflecting its mixed long-term financial performance despite maintaining a clean balance sheet with zero promoter pledging and minimal institutional debt.
| Company | Market Cap (₹ Cr) | P/E (TTM) | P/BV | ROE % | Debt/Equity | Div Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manaksia | 417.00 | 8.01 | 0.66 | 12.76% | -0.53 | — |
| Uni Abex Alloy | — | 16.88 | 4.13 | 25.42% | -0.37 | 1.18% |
| Azad India | — | 2016.41 | 4.24 | 0.10% | -0.42 | — |
| India Homes | — | NA (Loss Making) | 24.16 | 0.00% | 3.86 | — |
| Shah Metacorp | — | 42.00 | 1.38 | 1.53% | 0.21 | — |
| Suraj | — | NA (Loss Making) | 3.23 | 11.39% | 0.32 | 1.25% |
Peer Comparison: Valuation Discount Reflects Operational Concerns
Manaksia trades at a significant valuation discount to peers, with a price-to-earnings ratio of 8.01x compared to the industry average of 13x. The price-to-book value of 0.66x suggests the market values the company's net assets at a 34% discount to book value, reflecting scepticism about the company's ability to generate adequate returns on its equity base. This discount appears justified given the declining ROE of 8.28% in the latest period.
Compared to peers, Manaksia's ROE of 12.76% (average) sits in the middle of the pack, trailing Uni Abex Alloy's impressive 25.42% but ahead of several loss-making or low-return competitors. The company's net cash position (debt-to-equity of -0.53) stands out favourably, providing financial stability that many peers lack. However, this balance sheet strength has not translated into superior operational performance or stock price appreciation.
The absence of dividend payments (dividend yield of zero) further dampens investor appeal, particularly for income-focused investors. The last dividend of ₹3.00 per share was paid in September 2023, and the current dividend payout ratio stands at zero, suggesting management is conserving cash amid operational challenges rather than rewarding shareholders.
Valuation Analysis: Discount Warranted by Deteriorating Fundamentals
At the current market price of ₹64.00, Manaksia trades at 8.01x trailing twelve-month earnings, representing a 38% discount to the sector average P/E of 13x. The enterprise value-to-EBITDA multiple of 1.75x and EV-to-EBIT of 1.97x appear superficially attractive but must be viewed in the context of declining profitability and unsustainable other income contributions. The EV-to-sales ratio of 0.10x reflects the market's pessimism about the company's ability to generate profits from its revenue base.
The price-to-book ratio of 0.66x suggests the market believes the company's assets are worth less than their stated book value, or alternatively, that the company will struggle to earn returns above its cost of capital. Given the latest ROE of 8.28%—well below most investors' required rate of return—this discount appears rational. The book value per share stands at ₹87.31, implying a theoretical upside of 36% if the company were to trade at book value, but such a re-rating would require demonstrated improvement in operational performance.
The stock has traded in a 52-week range of ₹54.59 to ₹85.92, currently sitting 25.51% below its 52-week high and 17.24% above its 52-week low. This positioning in the lower half of the trading range reflects sustained selling pressure and lack of investor confidence. The valuation grade has oscillated between "Attractive" and "Fair" over the past year, currently classified as "Attractive" since October 2025, though this assessment appears generous given the operational deterioration.
Shareholding Pattern: Stable Promoter Base, Minimal Institutional Interest
Manaksia's shareholding structure has remained remarkably stable over the past five quarters, with promoter holding steady at 74.93%. The promoter group, led by the Agrawal family with Varun Agrawal (18.88%), Vineet Agrawal (12.38%), and Suresh Kumar Agrawal (9.43%) as key stakeholders, demonstrates strong commitment with zero pledging of shares—a positive indicator of financial health and confidence.
| Quarter | Promoter % | FII % | MF % | Insurance % | Other DII % | Non-Inst % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec'25 | 74.93% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.21% | 23.91% |
| Sep'25 | 74.93% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.21% | 23.91% |
| Jun'25 | 74.93% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.21% | 23.91% |
| Mar'25 | 74.93% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.21% | 23.76% |
| Dec'24 | 74.93% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.21% | 23.76% |
However, the shareholding pattern reveals a concerning lack of institutional conviction. Foreign institutional investor (FII) holding stands at a negligible 0.95%, having declined marginally from 1.10% in March 2025. More tellingly, mutual fund holding is zero, and insurance company participation is absent. The total institutional holding of just 1.16% signals that sophisticated investors have largely shunned the stock, likely due to concerns about growth prospects, profitability sustainability, and the company's exposure to Nigerian markets.
The non-institutional shareholding of 23.91% comprises retail investors and non-institutional entities, representing the free float available for trading. The absence of mutual fund interest is particularly notable, as these investors typically conduct thorough fundamental analysis before committing capital. Their absence suggests the investment case for Manaksia remains unconvincing to professional money managers.
Stock Performance: Severe Underperformance Across All Timeframes
Manaksia's stock price performance has been dismal across virtually all timeframes, with the shares declining 21.09% over the past year compared to the Sensex's 7.18% gain, resulting in negative alpha of -28.27 percentage points. The underperformance extends across longer periods, with the stock down 51.70% over two years (versus Sensex +15.65%), down 31.37% over three years (versus Sensex +38.27%), and down 16.61% over four years (versus Sensex +43.83%).
| Period | Stock Return | Sensex Return | Alpha | Sector Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Week | -2.50% | +0.90% | -3.40% | — |
| 1 Month | +1.59% | -2.84% | +4.43% | — |
| 3 Months | -6.06% | -2.53% | -3.53% | — |
| 6 Months | -19.29% | +0.97% | -20.26% | — |
| YTD | -0.51% | -3.46% | +2.95% | — |
| 1 Year | -21.09% | +7.18% | -28.27% | +72.17% |
| 2 Years | -51.70% | +15.65% | -67.35% | — |
| 3 Years | -31.37% | +38.27% | -69.64% | — |
| 5 Years | +24.63% | +77.74% | -53.11% | — |
The technical picture remains challenging, with the stock trading below all key moving averages—the 5-day (₹65.16), 20-day (₹65.31), 50-day (₹63.52), 100-day (₹65.74), and 200-day (₹68.69) moving averages. The current trend is classified as "Mildly Bearish" as of January 27, 2026, having shifted from "Sideways" earlier in the month. Technical indicators paint a mixed picture, with the MACD showing mildly bullish signals on the weekly chart but bearish on the monthly, whilst Bollinger Bands indicate bearish momentum across both timeframes.
The stock's beta of 1.14 indicates it is more volatile than the broader market, amplifying both gains and losses. However, given the consistent negative alpha generation, this higher volatility has worked against investors. The risk-adjusted return over one year stands at -0.53, with volatility of 39.45%—categorising Manaksia as a "High Risk Low Return" investment. This unfavourable risk-return profile explains the lack of institutional interest and retail investor exodus.
"With operating margins at multi-quarter lows and over 82% of profits derived from other income, Manaksia's earnings quality has deteriorated significantly, raising serious sustainability concerns."
Investment Thesis: Quality Concerns Outweigh Valuation Appeal
Manaksia's investment case presents a complex picture where apparent valuation attractions are overshadowed by fundamental operational weaknesses. The proprietary Mojo Score of 31 out of 100 reflects this reality, placing the stock firmly in "SELL" territory. The score breakdown reveals the core issues: whilst valuation appears fair at current levels, the negative financial trend, mildly bearish technical setup, and average quality grade combine to create an unappealing risk-reward proposition.
The company's four-dot Mojo analysis highlights the challenges: near-term drivers are negative (quarterly financial trend negative, technicals mildly bearish), quality is average, and valuation is merely fair rather than compelling. The overall assessment remains cautious, with mixed signals across parameters but a predominance of negative factors. The financial trend has been classified as negative since February 2025, reflecting the sustained deterioration in operating metrics.
KEY STRENGTHS
- Fortress Balance Sheet: Zero long-term debt and net cash position with debt-to-equity of -0.53 provides financial stability
- No Promoter Pledging: 74.93% promoter holding with zero pledged shares demonstrates confidence and financial health
- Valuation Discount: Trading at 8.01x P/E (38% below sector average) and 0.66x P/BV offers potential value if operations improve
- Diversified Operations: Presence across galvanised steel, aluminium products, metal closures, and paper packaging in Nigeria
- Strong Historical ROCE: Five-year average ROCE of 44.41% demonstrates past capital efficiency excellence
- Adequate Interest Coverage: EBIT-to-interest ratio of 9.38x provides comfortable debt servicing cushion
KEY CONCERNS
- Collapsing Operating Margins: Operating margin (excluding OI) at 3.73%, down from 8.87% year-ago, indicates severe competitive or cost pressures
- Unsustainable Profit Composition: Other income constitutes 82.20% of PBT, masking weak core business performance
- Declining Return Ratios: ROCE collapsed from 44% to 14%, ROE down to 8.28%, signalling deteriorating capital efficiency
- Negative Revenue Growth: Five-year sales CAGR of -0.43% and EBIT CAGR of -3.79% show structural decline
- Minimal Institutional Interest: Total institutional holding of just 1.16% with zero mutual fund participation
- Severe Stock Underperformance: Down 21.09% over one year versus sector gain of 72.17%, underperforming by 93.26 percentage points
- High Volatility, Low Returns: Beta of 1.14 with negative alpha across all timeframes creates unfavourable risk-reward
Outlook: What Lies Ahead for Manaksia
The outlook for Manaksia remains clouded by operational uncertainties and the sustainability of recent profit levels. For the company to merit a re-rating, management must demonstrate several critical improvements: restoration of operating margins to historical levels above 8%, reduction in reliance on other income to below 30% of PBT, stabilisation and growth in the core Nigerian operations, and consistent quarter-on-quarter revenue growth. Until these improvements materialise, the stock is likely to remain in the penalty box.
POSITIVE CATALYSTS TO WATCH
- Operating margin recovery above 6% sustained for two consecutive quarters
- Core operational profit (excluding OI) crossing ₹10 crores quarterly
- Revenue growth returning to positive territory on a consistent basis
- ROCE stabilising above 20% indicating improved capital deployment
- Institutional investor interest emerging with MF or FII stake building
RED FLAGS REQUIRING MONITORING
- Other income continuing to exceed 70% of PBT in Q4 FY26
- Operating margins falling below 3% threshold
- Further deterioration in ROCE below 12% levels
- Promoter stake reduction or any emergence of pledging
- Stock breaking below 52-week low of ₹54.59 on sustained basis
The Q4 FY26 results, expected in May 2026, will be critical in determining whether the Q3 performance represents a genuine turnaround or merely a temporary respite driven by non-operating gains. Investors should focus on the sustainability of operating margins, the composition of profitability, and any commentary from management regarding the Nigerian operations and future growth strategies. The company's ability to generate institutional interest will also serve as a key barometer of improving fundamentals.
The Verdict: Operational Weakness Outweighs Balance Sheet Strength
Mojo Score: 31/100
For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions at current levels. Whilst the valuation appears attractive superficially, the deteriorating operational metrics, unsustainable profit composition (82% from other income), and collapsing return ratios present significant risks. The lack of institutional conviction and severe underperformance versus the sector (down 93 percentage points) signal deeper structural issues. Wait for concrete evidence of margin recovery and sustainable operational improvement before considering entry.
For Existing Holders: Consider reducing exposure or exiting positions. The Q3 FY26 results, whilst showing sequential profit growth, mask underlying weakness with operating margins at multi-quarter lows of 3.73% and excessive reliance on non-operating income. The five-year negative sales growth of -0.43% and ROCE collapse from 44% to 14% indicate structural challenges unlikely to reverse quickly. The technical setup remains bearish, and the stock trades below all key moving averages.
Fair Value Estimate: ₹55-58 (14-19% downside from current levels), based on sustainable earnings normalisation and sector-appropriate 7-8x P/E multiple once other income dependency is adjusted.
Note: ROCE = (EBIT - Other income) / (Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)
⚠️ Investment Disclaimer
This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and all investments carry risk of loss.
