Manba Finance Q2 FY26: Strong Growth Masked by Structural Concerns

Nov 11 2025 08:36 PM IST
share
Share Via
Manba Finance Ltd., a Mumbai-based micro-cap non-banking financial company specialising in vehicle financing, reported net profit of ₹11.40 crores for Q2 FY26, representing a sequential increase of 16.92% from ₹9.75 crores in Q1 FY26 and year-on-year growth of 2.06% from ₹11.64 crores in Q2 FY25. Despite the headline profit growth, the stock has struggled significantly over the past year, declining 9.59% whilst the broader Sensex gained 5.50%, reflecting investor concerns about the company's weak return on equity, deteriorating cash flows, and persistent underperformance against its NBFC sector peers.





Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

₹11.40 Cr

▲ 16.92% QoQ



Net Sales Growth (YoY)

17.78%

▲ Strong momentum



PAT Margin

15.76%

▲ 29 bps QoQ



Return on Equity

10.25%

Below par




With a market capitalisation of ₹693.00 crores and current price of ₹141.95, Manba Finance presents a paradox for investors. Whilst the company has demonstrated robust topline expansion—net sales grew 17.78% year-on-year to ₹72.33 crores in Q2 FY26—the underlying fundamentals reveal a company grappling with capital efficiency challenges, negative operating cash flows, and a quality grade that has slipped to "Below Average" from "Average" in September 2025. The company's proprietary Mojo Score stands at a concerning 28 out of 100, placing it firmly in "Strong Sell" territory and raising questions about whether the recent profit growth is sustainable or merely masking deeper structural issues.

















































































Quarter Net Sales (₹ Cr) QoQ Growth YoY Growth Net Profit (₹ Cr) QoQ Growth PAT Margin
Sep'25 72.33 +14.74% +17.78% 11.40 +16.92% 15.76%
Jun'25 63.04 -3.79% +38.19% 9.75 +21.55% 15.47%
Mar'25 65.52 +1.77% +29.64% 8.02 -38.12% 12.24%
Dec'24 64.38 +4.84% 12.96 +11.34% 20.13%
Sep'24 61.41 +34.61% 11.64 +124.71% 18.95%
Jun'24 45.62 -9.73% 5.18 -47.09% 11.35%
Mar'24 50.54 9.79 19.37%



Financial Performance: Topline Momentum Outpaces Profitability Gains



Manba Finance's Q2 FY26 results showcase impressive revenue acceleration, with net sales climbing 14.74% sequentially to ₹72.33 crores from ₹63.04 crores in Q1 FY26. On a year-on-year basis, the 17.78% growth reflects the company's expanding vehicle financing book, though this represents a deceleration from the exceptional 38.19% year-on-year growth witnessed in the previous quarter. The company's operating profit before depreciation, interest, and tax (PBDIT) excluding other income reached ₹51.28 crores, marking the highest level in recent quarters and translating to a robust operating margin of 70.90%.



Net profit of ₹11.40 crores in Q2 FY26 improved sequentially by 16.92%, though the year-on-year comparison reveals a modest 2.06% increase, indicating that profit growth is struggling to keep pace with revenue expansion. The profit after tax margin of 15.76% in Q2 FY26 represents a 29 basis point improvement from 15.47% in Q1 FY26, yet remains substantially below the 20.13% margin achieved in December 2024. This margin compression reflects rising interest costs—which surged to ₹34.80 crores in Q2 FY26 from ₹32.39 crores in Q1 FY26—as the company's borrowing costs continue to escalate in line with the overall tightening of financial conditions.





Net Sales (Q2 FY26)

₹72.33 Cr

▲ 14.74% QoQ | ▲ 17.78% YoY



Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

₹11.40 Cr

▲ 16.92% QoQ | ▲ 2.06% YoY



Operating Margin (Excl OI)

70.90%

▲ 156 bps QoQ



PAT Margin

15.76%

▲ 29 bps QoQ




For the first half of FY26 (H1 FY26), Manba Finance reported cumulative net sales of ₹135.37 crores and net profit of ₹21.15 crores, representing year-on-year growth of 26.59% and 25.74% respectively when compared to H1 FY25. Employee costs have risen proportionally with business expansion, reaching ₹14.29 crores in Q2 FY26 from ₹13.06 crores in Q1 FY26, reflecting the company's continued investment in its workforce to support the growing loan book. The tax rate of 25.20% in Q2 FY26 marks an increase from 19.95% in Q1 FY26, suggesting normalisation after a period of lower effective tax rates.



Capital Efficiency Crisis: ROE Weakness Undermines Growth Story



Whilst Manba Finance's topline growth appears impressive on the surface, a deeper examination of capital efficiency metrics reveals significant concerns that explain the stock's persistent underperformance. The company's return on equity (ROE) stands at a weak 10.25% for the latest period, with an average ROE of just 11.91% over the longer term—substantially below the threshold that typically attracts quality-focused institutional investors. For context, superior NBFCs in India typically deliver ROE in excess of 15-18%, making Manba Finance's capital efficiency notably subpar.



The company's return on capital employed (ROCE) paints an even more concerning picture at just 4.29%, indicating that the business is generating minimal returns on the total capital deployed. This weak ROCE, combined with elevated leverage—the company's average net debt to equity ratio stands at 2.91 times—suggests that Manba Finance is relying heavily on borrowed funds to fuel growth, yet failing to convert this leverage into attractive shareholder returns. The balance sheet reveals shareholder funds of ₹368.90 crores as of March 2025, up from ₹200.61 crores in March 2024, largely driven by a substantial increase in share capital from ₹37.67 crores to ₹50.24 crores, indicating fresh equity dilution.




Critical Concern: Negative Operating Cash Flow


The most alarming aspect of Manba Finance's financial profile is the persistent negative operating cash flow, which reached a staggering ₹323.56 crores in FY25—the lowest on record. For an NBFC, negative operating cash flow typically indicates rapid loan book expansion funded through borrowings rather than internal accruals, raising questions about the sustainability of the growth model. The company has been forced to rely on financing cash flows of ₹453.00 crores in FY25 to bridge this gap, further increasing leverage and financial risk.




The current asset position of ₹293.50 crores as of March 2025 represents a significant increase from ₹163.79 crores in March 2024, reflecting the expanding loan book. However, current liabilities have surged even more dramatically to ₹1,101.53 crores from ₹775.28 crores, highlighting the company's increasing reliance on short-term borrowings to fund operations. This mismatch between asset and liability growth, combined with negative operating cash flows, creates a precarious financial position that could prove challenging if credit conditions tighten or asset quality deteriorates.



Institutional Exodus: Foreign Investors Flee Amid Quality Concerns



The shareholding pattern reveals a troubling trend of institutional divestment that underscores broader concerns about Manba Finance's investment appeal. Foreign institutional investor (FII) holdings have plummeted from 5.23% in September 2024 to just 0.88% in September 2025, representing a dramatic 83% reduction in foreign ownership over the past year. This exodus accelerated particularly sharply between December 2024 and March 2025, when FII holdings collapsed from 2.35% to 0.92%—a clear vote of no confidence from sophisticated international investors.

























































Quarter Promoter % FII % Change DII % Change
Sep'25 74.98% 0.88% +0.01% 0.00% 0.00%
Jun'25 74.98% 0.87% -0.05% 0.00% 0.00%
Mar'25 74.98% 0.92% -1.43% 0.00% -0.42%
Dec'24 74.98% 2.35% -2.88% 0.42% -6.84%
Sep'24 74.98% 5.23% 7.26%



Domestic institutional investors (DIIs) have similarly abandoned the stock, with holdings collapsing from 7.26% in September 2024 to zero by June 2025. Mutual fund holdings remain at zero throughout the period, whilst insurance company participation has also evaporated. The total institutional ownership—combining FIIs, mutual funds, insurance companies, and other DIIs—now stands at a negligible 0.88%, placing Manba Finance firmly in the category of retail-dominated, institutionally shunned stocks. This lack of institutional support not only limits liquidity but also signals that professional investors have identified fundamental concerns that outweigh any near-term growth prospects.



Promoter holding has remained stable at 74.98% throughout the past five quarters, with no pledging of shares—a positive factor that at least demonstrates promoter confidence and financial stability at the ownership level. However, the steady rise in non-institutional holdings from 12.51% in September 2024 to 24.14% in September 2025 suggests that retail investors are filling the void left by exiting institutions, potentially creating a less sophisticated shareholder base that may prove more volatile during periods of stress.



Peer Comparison: Valuation Discount Reflects Fundamental Weakness



When benchmarked against its NBFC peer group, Manba Finance's relative positioning reveals why the market has assigned it a valuation discount despite seemingly attractive multiples. Trading at a price-to-earnings ratio of 18.68 times trailing twelve-month earnings and a price-to-book value of 1.91 times, Manba Finance appears moderately valued on the surface. However, this valuation must be contextualised against the company's inferior return on equity of 11.91%—which, whilst higher than several loss-making peers, remains substantially below the levels that justify premium valuations in the NBFC sector.

































































Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE % Debt/Equity Div Yield %
Manba Finance 18.68 1.91 11.91% 2.91 0.28%
Niyogin Fintech NA (Loss Making) 2.50 0.00% 0.30
Laxmi India Fin. 21.47 3.00 12.56% 4.42
VLS Finance NA (Loss Making) 0.29 7.37% 0.00 0.72%
Yogi Ltd 39.84 0.51 0.96% 0.78
The Invest. Trust 30.53 0.09 2.57% 0.72



Manba Finance's ROE of 11.91% positions it as the second-best performer in this peer group after Laxmi India Finance's 12.56%, but this comparison is somewhat misleading given that several peers are loss-making entities trading at distressed valuations. The company's price-to-book ratio of 1.91 times sits in the middle of the pack, below Laxmi India Finance's 3.00 times and Niyogin Fintech's 2.50 times, but substantially above deeply discounted peers like VLS Finance and The Investment Trust. This suggests the market is pricing Manba Finance as a "middle quality" NBFC—not distressed enough to trade at book value or below, but not strong enough to command premium multiples.



The debt-to-equity ratio of 2.91 times for Manba Finance is concerning when compared to peers, ranking as the second-highest in the group after Laxmi India Finance's 4.42 times. This elevated leverage, combined with the weak ROCE of just 4.29%, indicates that the company is taking on significant financial risk without generating commensurate returns—a dangerous combination that explains why institutional investors have fled. The dividend yield of 0.28% is minimal, reflecting both the company's need to conserve capital and its limited profit generation relative to market capitalisation.



Valuation Analysis: "Attractive" Grade Masks Fundamental Risks



Manba Finance currently carries a valuation grade of "Attractive" as of November 11, 2025, having been upgraded from "Very Expensive" in late July 2025 following the stock's significant price correction. At the current price of ₹141.95, the stock trades 29.55% below its 52-week high of ₹201.50, yet remains 23.27% above its 52-week low of ₹115.15. This price action reflects the market's ongoing reassessment of the company's fair value in light of deteriorating fundamentals and quality concerns.



The enterprise value to EBITDA multiple of 27.51 times appears elevated for an NBFC with weak return metrics, whilst the EV to sales ratio of 6.00 times suggests the market is still pricing in expectations of future margin expansion and profitability improvements. However, these expectations appear increasingly difficult to justify given the company's persistent capital efficiency challenges and negative operating cash flows. The PEG ratio is listed as not available, likely due to inconsistent earnings growth patterns that make traditional growth-adjusted valuation metrics unreliable.




Valuation Dashboard




P/E Ratio (TTM)

18.68x



Price to Book

1.91x



Dividend Yield

0.28%



Mojo Score

28/100





The company's valuation grade history reveals significant volatility, with multiple oscillations between "Very Attractive," "Attractive," and "Very Expensive" over recent months. This instability in valuation assessment reflects the market's difficulty in establishing a stable fair value for a company with inconsistent fundamentals and deteriorating quality metrics. The current "Attractive" valuation must be viewed with scepticism, as it primarily reflects the stock's price decline rather than any fundamental improvement in business quality or earnings power.



Stock Performance: Persistent Underperformance Across All Timeframes



Manba Finance's stock performance has been decidedly weak across virtually all meaningful timeframes, with the company consistently underperforming both the broader Sensex benchmark and its NBFC sector peers. Over the past year, the stock has declined 9.59% whilst the Sensex gained 5.50%, resulting in negative alpha of 15.09 percentage points. More concerning is the underperformance against the NBFC sector, which delivered returns of 19.32% over the same period—a differential of 28.91 percentage points that highlights Manba Finance's relative weakness within its own industry.

































































Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha Verdict
1 Day +3.09% +0.40% +2.69% Outperformance
1 Week -0.42% +0.49% -0.91% Underperformance
1 Month +5.77% +1.66% +4.11% Outperformance
3 Months +3.69% +4.05% -0.36% Slight underperformance
6 Months +14.43% +5.56% +8.87% Outperformance
YTD -12.54% +7.34% -19.88% Significant underperformance
1 Year -9.59% +5.50% -15.09% Significant underperformance



The year-to-date performance of negative 12.54% against the Sensex's positive 7.34% return translates to alpha of negative 19.88 percentage points, indicating that Manba Finance has been one of the market's notable underperformers in 2025. The six-month return of 14.43% against the Sensex's 5.56% gain represents a brief period of outperformance, likely driven by the sharp rally from the 52-week low of ₹115.15 in early 2025. However, this bounce has proven unsustainable, with the stock subsequently giving back gains and resuming its downward trajectory.



From a technical perspective, the stock currently exhibits a "Mildly Bearish" trend as of November 11, 2025, having transitioned from "Bearish" on October 31, 2025. The stock trades above all key moving averages—5-day (₹141.94), 20-day (₹137.30), 50-day (₹137.49), 100-day (₹139.02), and 200-day (₹139.06)—suggesting some near-term technical strength despite the longer-term downtrend. However, the proximity to these moving averages indicates limited upside cushion, with immediate resistance clustered in the ₹137-139 range.



The stock's beta of 1.50 indicates high volatility relative to the broader market, with volatility of 36.52% over the past year—nearly triple the Sensex's volatility of 12.38%. This elevated volatility, combined with negative returns, places Manba Finance squarely in the "High Risk Low Return" category, with a negative risk-adjusted return of 0.26 compared to the Sensex's positive risk-adjusted return of 0.44. For risk-averse investors, this profile is particularly unattractive, as it suggests elevated downside risk without commensurate upside potential.



Investment Thesis: Quality Concerns Trump Growth Narrative



The investment case for Manba Finance rests on a fundamental tension between near-term growth momentum and longer-term quality concerns. On the positive side, the company has demonstrated consistent topline expansion, with five-year sales growth of 37.10% and EBIT growth of 48.30%, reflecting its success in scaling the vehicle financing business across multiple states. The operating margins remain robust above 70%, and the company has managed to improve sequential profitability in recent quarters. The valuation appears "Attractive" at current levels, with the stock trading at reasonable multiples relative to its earnings and book value.




Mojo Parameters Dashboard




Valuation

Attractive



Quality Grade

Below Average



Financial Trend

Flat



Technical Trend

Mildly Bearish





However, these positives are substantially outweighed by critical structural weaknesses that have prompted the company's Mojo Score to plummet to 28 out of 100. The "Below Average" quality grade reflects fundamental concerns about capital efficiency, with ROE of just 11.91% and ROCE of 4.29% indicating that the company is destroying shareholder value rather than creating it. The massive negative operating cash flow of ₹323.56 crores in FY25 raises serious questions about the sustainability of the growth model, suggesting that expansion is being funded through ever-increasing leverage rather than internal cash generation.



The institutional exodus—with FII holdings collapsing from 5.23% to 0.88% and DII holdings falling to zero—represents a powerful signal that sophisticated investors have identified risks that outweigh any potential rewards. The elevated debt-to-equity ratio of 2.91 times, combined with weak return metrics, creates a precarious financial structure that could prove vulnerable to adverse changes in credit conditions or asset quality. The flat financial trend in recent quarters, despite topline growth, suggests that the company is struggling to convert revenue expansion into meaningful bottom-line improvements.




"Growth without returns is merely revenue expansion funded by shareholder dilution and debt accumulation—a recipe for value destruction rather than creation."


Key Strengths & Risk Factors





KEY STRENGTHS ✓



  • Strong Revenue Growth: Consistent topline expansion with 37.10% five-year sales CAGR demonstrates market share gains in vehicle financing

  • Robust Operating Margins: Operating margin above 70% indicates strong pricing power and operational efficiency in core lending business

  • Stable Promoter Holdings: Promoter stake steady at 74.98% with zero pledging demonstrates ownership commitment and financial stability

  • Attractive Valuation: Trading at 18.68x P/E and 1.91x P/BV offers reasonable entry multiples relative to earnings and book value

  • Sequential Profit Improvement: Q2 FY26 net profit of ₹11.40 crores up 16.92% QoQ shows near-term momentum

  • Expanding Geographic Footprint: Multi-state presence in vehicle financing provides diversification and growth runway




KEY CONCERNS ⚠



  • Weak Capital Efficiency: ROE of 11.91% and ROCE of 4.29% indicate poor returns on deployed capital—well below industry standards

  • Massive Negative Cash Flows: Operating cash flow of negative ₹323.56 crores in FY25 raises sustainability concerns about growth model

  • Institutional Exodus: FII holdings crashed from 5.23% to 0.88% and DII holdings fell to zero—clear vote of no confidence

  • High Leverage: Debt-to-equity ratio of 2.91x creates financial vulnerability, especially given weak return metrics

  • Below Average Quality: Quality grade downgraded to "Below Average" reflects deteriorating fundamental strength

  • Persistent Underperformance: Stock down 9.59% over one year whilst sector gained 19.32%—negative alpha of 28.91 percentage points

  • High Volatility: Beta of 1.50 and volatility of 36.52% indicate elevated risk without commensurate returns





Outlook: What Lies Ahead





POSITIVE CATALYSTS



  • Sustained improvement in ROE above 15% would signal enhanced capital efficiency

  • Positive operating cash flow generation demonstrating self-sustaining growth model

  • Return of institutional investors (FII/DII) indicating renewed confidence

  • Margin expansion beyond current levels whilst maintaining asset quality

  • Deleveraging to bring debt-to-equity below 2.0x reducing financial risk




RED FLAGS TO MONITOR



  • Further deterioration in operating cash flows indicating unsustainable growth

  • Any decline in asset quality or increase in non-performing assets

  • Continued institutional selling or promoter stake dilution

  • Margin compression below 70% operational threshold

  • Inability to improve ROE/ROCE metrics over next 2-3 quarters

  • Breach of key technical support at ₹115 (52-week low)





The outlook for Manba Finance remains clouded by the fundamental disconnect between growth and returns. Whilst the company continues to expand its loan book and generate revenue growth, the inability to convert this expansion into attractive shareholder returns—as evidenced by weak ROE and negative operating cash flows—suggests a business model under strain. The company faces a critical juncture where it must demonstrate that recent growth is translating into sustainable profitability improvements and positive cash generation, or risk further institutional abandonment and valuation compression.



For the investment thesis to turn positive, Manba Finance would need to demonstrate several quarters of consistently improving return metrics, positive operating cash flows, and evidence of deleveraging. The company must also attract institutional investors back to the stock, which would require not just improved financial performance but also enhanced corporate governance and transparency. Until these fundamental improvements materialise, the stock is likely to remain range-bound at best, with significant downside risk if asset quality deteriorates or credit conditions tighten.




The Verdict: Growth Without Returns Warrants Caution


STRONG SELL

Score: 28/100


For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions despite attractive valuation. The weak ROE of 11.91%, negative operating cash flows of ₹323.56 crores, and institutional exodus signal fundamental quality concerns that outweigh near-term growth momentum. The "Below Average" quality grade and high leverage of 2.91x debt-to-equity create significant downside risk.


For Existing Holders: Consider exiting positions on any technical bounce towards ₹145-150 levels. The persistent underperformance against both the Sensex (negative 15.09% alpha over one year) and the NBFC sector (negative 28.91% differential) suggests the market has correctly identified structural weaknesses. The flat financial trend despite topline growth indicates deteriorating operating leverage.


Fair Value Estimate: ₹120-125 (13% downside risk from current levels), reflecting the company's below-average quality, weak capital efficiency, and elevated financial risk. The current "Attractive" valuation grade is misleading, as it fails to adequately account for the substantial deterioration in fundamental quality and cash flow generation.


Rationale: Whilst Manba Finance demonstrates impressive topline growth of 17.78% year-on-year, the underlying fundamentals reveal a company struggling with capital efficiency, sustainability, and institutional confidence. The combination of weak ROE (11.91%), anaemic ROCE (4.29%), massive negative operating cash flows, and an institutional exodus creates a risk-reward profile heavily skewed to the downside. The Mojo Score of 28/100 and "Strong Sell" rating appropriately reflect these structural concerns, which are unlikely to be resolved in the near term.





Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)





⚠️ Investment Disclaimer


This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. All investment decisions carry risk, including the potential loss of principal.





{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News