MRP Agro Q3 FY26: Revenue Plunge Sparks Profitability Concerns

Feb 07 2026 08:48 PM IST
share
Share Via
MRP Agro Ltd., a micro-cap food grains and commodities trading company with a market capitalisation of ₹103.00 crores, reported a concerning third quarter for FY2026, with net sales plummeting 41.69% quarter-on-quarter to ₹14.14 crores. Net profit declined 19.79% sequentially to ₹1.54 crores, raising questions about the sustainability of the company's recent growth trajectory. The stock, currently trading at ₹93.00, has underperformed significantly over the past year, down 35.42% whilst the Sensex gained 7.07%.
MRP Agro Q3 FY26: Revenue Plunge Sparks Profitability Concerns
Net Profit (Q3 FY26)
₹1.54 Cr
▼ 19.79% QoQ
Revenue (Q3 FY26)
₹14.14 Cr
▼ 41.69% QoQ
Operating Margin
16.97%
▲ 320 bps QoQ
PAT Margin
10.89%
▲ 297 bps QoQ

The sharp revenue contraction in Q3 FY26 represents a significant setback for the Indore-based trading company, which had demonstrated robust growth momentum through most of FY2025. Whilst margin expansion provided some cushion—operating margins improved from 13.77% in Q2 FY26 to 16.97% in Q3 FY26—the absolute decline in top-line performance has raised concerns about demand visibility and order book strength heading into the final quarter of the fiscal year.

MRP Agro, which specialises in trading food grains, fly-ash, and coal with import-export capabilities, has been operating as a public limited company since September 2020. The company's business model remains dependent on commodity trading dynamics, making it susceptible to volume fluctuations and margin pressures from raw material price volatility.

Financial Performance: Sharp Revenue Decline Overshadows Margin Gains

The third quarter of FY2026 painted a concerning picture for MRP Agro's operational momentum. Net sales of ₹14.14 crores represented a steep 41.69% decline from the previous quarter's ₹24.25 crores, marking the lowest quarterly revenue figure in the current fiscal year. This dramatic contraction suggests either a significant loss of business volume or strategic decisions to reduce lower-margin trading activities.

Quarter Net Sales (₹ Cr) QoQ Change Net Profit (₹ Cr) QoQ Change Operating Margin PAT Margin
Dec'25 (Q3) 14.14 -41.69% 1.54 -19.79% 16.97% 10.89%
Sep'25 (Q2) 24.25 +14.93% 1.92 +27.15% 13.77% 7.92%
Jun'25 (Q1) 21.10 1.51 6.30% 7.16%

On a positive note, the company demonstrated improved operational efficiency despite the revenue decline. Operating profit margin (excluding other income) expanded significantly to 16.97% in Q3 FY26 from 13.77% in Q2 FY26 and 6.30% in Q1 FY26. This margin improvement suggests better product mix or successful cost management initiatives. PAT margin similarly improved to 10.89% from 7.92% in the previous quarter, indicating that the company maintained pricing discipline even as volumes contracted.

However, the absolute profit decline remains concerning. Net profit of ₹1.54 crores in Q3 FY26 fell 19.79% from ₹1.92 crores in Q2 FY26, though it remained marginally ahead of Q1 FY26's ₹1.51 crores. The company's quarterly financial trend has been classified as "Negative" by proprietary analysis, with net sales falling 44.7% below the previous four-quarter average and PAT declining 15.0% below the same benchmark.

Revenue (Q3 FY26)
₹14.14 Cr
▼ 41.69% QoQ
Net Profit (Q3 FY26)
₹1.54 Cr
▼ 19.79% QoQ
Operating Margin
16.97%
▲ 320 bps QoQ
Gross Margin
17.40%
▲ 309 bps QoQ

Other income declined sharply to ₹0.06 crores in Q3 FY26 from ₹0.13 crores in Q2 FY26 and ₹1.00 crore in Q1 FY26, reducing its contribution to overall profitability. This suggests the company is generating less income from treasury operations or non-core activities. Interest costs remained negligible across all quarters, reflecting the company's zero-debt status—a significant positive in an otherwise challenging quarter.

Balance Sheet Strength: Zero Debt But Limited Scale

MRP Agro's balance sheet reveals a company with minimal financial leverage but limited operational scale. As of March 2025, shareholder funds stood at ₹32.57 crores, comprising share capital of ₹11.11 crores and reserves of ₹21.46 crores. The company operates with zero long-term debt, positioning it favourably from a financial risk perspective.

Key Balance Sheet Highlights

Zero Debt Company: MRP Agro maintains no long-term borrowings, with a net debt-to-equity ratio of -0.32, indicating the company holds net cash on its books. This conservative capital structure provides financial flexibility but also suggests limited appetite for growth investments.

Asset Base: Fixed assets increased substantially to ₹10.18 crores in FY2025 from just ₹0.17 crores in FY2024, suggesting capital expenditure towards infrastructure. Current assets stood at ₹24.54 crores, though working capital management appears to have deteriorated based on cash flow data.

The company's return on equity (ROE) averaged 18.34% over recent periods, with the latest ROE at 20.75%—a respectable figure that demonstrates efficient capital deployment. Return on capital employed (ROCE) stood at 31.37% for the latest period, significantly above the average of 18.75%, indicating improving returns on invested capital despite the recent revenue challenges.

However, the cash flow statement for FY2025 reveals concerning trends. Operating cash flow turned negative at ₹3.00 crores, driven by a ₹13.00 crore increase in working capital. This suggests the company tied up significant cash in inventory or receivables, potentially indicating slower inventory turnover or extended credit periods to customers. The company raised ₹10.00 crores through financing activities, likely through equity issuance given the increase in share capital, which helped maintain a positive net cash position.

Trading Business Dynamics: Volume Volatility Remains Key Challenge

The commodities trading business inherently carries high revenue volatility, and MRP Agro's Q3 FY26 performance exemplifies this characteristic. The 41.69% sequential revenue decline likely reflects either reduced trading volumes, strategic decisions to exit lower-margin contracts, or temporary disruptions in supply chains or customer demand.

Understanding the Revenue Volatility

MRP Agro's business model centres on trading food grains, fly-ash, and coal with both domestic and international operations. Such trading businesses typically operate on thin margins but high volumes. The sharp Q3 FY26 revenue contraction—from ₹24.25 crores to ₹14.14 crores—whilst maintaining improved margins suggests a conscious decision to focus on quality over quantity, or alternatively, reflects market conditions that limited available trading opportunities.

The company's five-year sales growth of 23.40% demonstrates long-term momentum, though this figure is heavily influenced by the exceptional FY2025 performance when revenues surged 139.5% to ₹103.00 crores. EBIT growth over five years averaged 54.24%, indicating operating leverage benefits during growth phases. However, the sustainability of this growth trajectory now appears questionable given the Q3 FY26 setback.

Employee costs remained minimal at ₹0.16 crores in Q3 FY26, down from ₹0.33 crores in Q2 FY26, suggesting a lean operational structure typical of trading businesses. The company's average sales to capital employed ratio of 2.81x indicates moderate asset turnover, though this metric can fluctuate significantly in trading businesses depending on inventory holding periods and credit cycles.

Peer Comparison: Valuation Appears Reasonable Within Limited Context

Comparing MRP Agro with its retailing sector peers reveals a company trading at relatively modest multiples, though the peer group itself is highly heterogeneous and includes businesses with vastly different operational profiles.

Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE % Debt/Equity
MRP Agro 14.63x 3.04x 18.34% -0.32
Jay Ambe Super. 62.00x 12.75x 20.54% 0.62
Ace Men 3260.91x 33.70x 0.00% 0.00
Novelix Pharma. 118.21x 4.38x 0.74% -0.06
Umiya Mobile 15.36x 1.97x 34.37% 1.45
Sattva Sukun 9.95x 0.74x 6.25% -0.09

At a P/E ratio of 14.63x, MRP Agro trades at a significant discount to most peers, though this comparison has limited utility given the diverse nature of businesses in the peer group. The company's P/BV ratio of 3.04x appears reasonable given its ROE of 18.34%, which compares favourably to most peers except Umiya Mobile. MRP Agro's zero-debt status (reflected in the negative debt-to-equity ratio of -0.32) provides a margin of safety compared to leveraged peers.

However, the peer comparison must be viewed with caution. The peer group includes companies with vastly different business models, from supermarkets to mobile retailers to pharmaceutical companies, making direct comparisons of limited analytical value. What the comparison does reveal is that MRP Agro trades at modest multiples relative to its profitability metrics, though this valuation discount likely reflects concerns about business sustainability and growth visibility.

Valuation Analysis: Attractive Multiples Offset by Execution Concerns

MRP Agro's current valuation metrics suggest the stock is attractively priced relative to historical norms and fundamental performance, though recent operational challenges temper this assessment. At ₹93.00, the stock trades at a P/E ratio of 15.0x trailing twelve-month earnings, well below the industry average P/E of 25x. This valuation discount reflects market scepticism about the company's ability to sustain its FY2025 growth trajectory.

P/E Ratio (TTM)
15.0x
vs Industry 25x
Price to Book
3.04x
Book Value ₹29.32
EV/EBITDA
10.35x
Moderate Multiple
EV/Sales
0.90x
Low Revenue Multiple

The stock's valuation grade has been classified as "Very Attractive" since September 2025, having improved from "Attractive" in April 2025. The price-to-book value of 3.04x appears reasonable given the company's ROE of 20.75%, suggesting the market is pricing in moderate growth expectations. The EV/EBITDA multiple of 10.35x and EV/Sales of 0.90x both indicate modest valuations for a company with demonstrated profitability.

However, the stock's performance tells a cautionary tale. Trading at ₹93.00, the stock sits 39.22% below its 52-week high of ₹153.00 reached earlier in the fiscal year, though it remains 10.25% above its 52-week low of ₹84.35. The dramatic decline from peak levels reflects market reassessment of growth sustainability following the Q3 FY26 revenue disappointment.

Valuation Concerns

Growth Sustainability Questions: Whilst current multiples appear attractive, the sharp Q3 FY26 revenue decline raises questions about whether the company can maintain the profitability levels that justify even these modest valuations. The PEG ratio of 0.03 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to growth, but this metric assumes historical growth rates are sustainable—an assumption now under scrutiny.

Shareholding Pattern: Promoter Stake Reduction Signals Caution

The shareholding pattern reveals significant changes that warrant attention. Promoter holding declined notably to 65.67% in both December 2025 and September 2025, down from 72.69% in June 2025 and 72.34% in March 2025. This 7.02 percentage point reduction in promoter stake between June and September 2025 represents a material dilution that coincided with the company's operational challenges.

Quarter Promoter % QoQ Change FII % MF % Other DII % Non-Inst %
Dec'25 65.67% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.23% 34.11%
Sep'25 65.67% -7.02% 0.00% 0.00% 0.18% 34.15%
Jun'25 72.69% +0.35% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 27.31%
Mar'25 72.34% +0.15% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 27.66%

The reduction in promoter holding appears to have been absorbed by non-institutional investors, whose stake increased from 27.31% in June 2025 to 34.15% in September 2025. Institutional participation remains minimal, with no presence from foreign institutional investors or mutual funds. Other domestic institutional investors (DIIs) hold a negligible 0.23%, having marginally increased their stake in recent quarters.

The absence of institutional investor interest is concerning for a company seeking to establish credibility in public markets. No mutual funds hold positions in the stock, suggesting fund managers remain unconvinced about the business model's scalability or sustainability. The minimal institutional holding of just 0.23% indicates the stock remains largely off the radar of professional investors, limiting potential demand catalysts.

Positively, there is no promoter pledging, eliminating concerns about forced selling or financial stress at the promoter level. The promoter group includes Manish Kumar Jain (27.39%), Raksha Jain (24.42%), Jaandar Agro Limited (5.75%), and other family members, suggesting concentrated family ownership that typically aligns with long-term value creation.

Stock Performance: Significant Underperformance Reflects Fundamental Concerns

MRP Agro's stock performance over the past year has been disappointing, with the shares declining 35.42% whilst the Sensex gained 7.07%—resulting in a negative alpha of 42.49 percentage points. This substantial underperformance reflects market concerns about the sustainability of the company's growth trajectory and recent operational challenges.

Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week -0.64% +1.59% -2.23%
1 Month -2.00% -1.74% -0.26%
3 Months -4.15% +0.32% -4.47%
6 Months -5.68% +3.77% -9.45%
YTD -3.10% -1.92% -1.18%
1 Year -35.42% +7.07% -42.49%
2 Years +108.75% +15.78% +92.97%
3 Years +142.63% +38.13% +104.50%

The stock's technical position has deteriorated significantly. Currently classified as "Mildly Bearish" since January 27, 2026, the shares trade below all key moving averages—5-day (₹93.95), 20-day (₹94.02), 50-day (₹94.97), 100-day (₹97.17), and 200-day (₹107.93). This alignment of moving averages in a downward sequence indicates sustained selling pressure and lack of buying interest.

The stock's beta of 1.50 indicates high volatility relative to the broader market, with the shares experiencing 50% more price fluctuation than the Sensex. This high beta, combined with negative returns, places the stock in the "High Risk Low Return" category—an unfavourable risk-reward profile. The stock's volatility of 38.66% over the past year significantly exceeds the Sensex's 11.53%, reflecting both the illiquidity typical of micro-cap stocks and fundamental uncertainty.

Longer-term performance provides some context to the recent decline. Over two years, the stock has gained 108.75% with positive alpha of 92.97 percentage points, whilst the three-year return stands at 142.63% with alpha of 104.50 percentage points. These longer-term figures demonstrate that the company did create substantial value during its growth phase, but the recent reversal suggests that earlier gains may have been excessive relative to sustainable business fundamentals.

"The 35% decline over the past year, combined with a 42% revenue drop in Q3, signals that earlier growth expectations were likely overoptimistic for a commodities trading business with inherent volume volatility."

Investment Thesis: Quality Concerns Outweigh Valuation Appeal

The investment case for MRP Agro presents a challenging assessment. Whilst the stock trades at attractive valuations with a P/E of 15x and P/BV of 3.04x, recent operational performance raises serious questions about business sustainability and growth visibility. The company's proprietary Mojo score of 34 out of 100, resulting in a "SELL" rating, reflects these concerns.

Valuation Grade
Very Attractive
Low multiples
Quality Grade
Average
Moderate quality
Financial Trend
Negative
Recent deterioration
Technical Trend
Mildly Bearish
Below all MAs

The company's quality grade of "Average" reflects mixed fundamentals. Positive factors include zero debt, healthy historical growth (5-year sales CAGR of 23.40%), no promoter pledging, and respectable profitability metrics with ROE of 18.34% and ROCE of 31.37%. However, these positives are offset by the recent negative financial trend, minimal institutional participation, and inherent business model challenges in commodities trading.

The sharp Q3 FY26 revenue decline—falling 44.7% below the four-quarter average—represents a material deterioration in operational momentum. Whilst margin expansion provided some cushion, absolute profit levels declined, and the company's quarterly trend has been classified as "Negative." This deterioration is particularly concerning given it occurred during what should be a seasonally strong period for agricultural commodities trading.

Key Strengths & Risk Factors

KEY STRENGTHS

  • Zero Debt Balance Sheet: No long-term borrowings with net cash position provides financial flexibility and eliminates refinancing risks
  • Margin Expansion: Operating margins improved to 16.97% in Q3 FY26 from 6.30% in Q1 FY26, demonstrating pricing discipline
  • Strong Profitability Metrics: ROE of 20.75% and ROCE of 31.37% indicate efficient capital deployment
  • No Promoter Pledging: Zero pledged shares eliminate concerns about forced selling or financial stress
  • Attractive Valuation: P/E of 15x and P/BV of 3.04x appear modest relative to profitability metrics
  • Long-term Growth Track Record: 5-year sales CAGR of 23.40% demonstrates historical momentum

KEY CONCERNS

  • Sharp Revenue Decline: Q3 FY26 sales plunged 41.69% QoQ to ₹14.14 crores, raising sustainability questions
  • Negative Operating Cash Flow: FY2025 operating cash flow of -₹3.00 crores indicates working capital stress
  • Promoter Stake Reduction: 7.02 percentage point decline in promoter holding between Jun-Sep 2025 signals caution
  • Zero Institutional Interest: No mutual fund or FII participation limits demand catalysts
  • Business Model Volatility: Commodities trading inherently carries high revenue fluctuation risks
  • Limited Scale: Market cap of ₹103 crores and quarterly revenues of ₹14-24 crores indicate micro-cap constraints
  • Poor Stock Performance: 35.42% decline over past year with 42.49 percentage point negative alpha

Outlook: Critical Quarter Ahead for Credibility Restoration

The fourth quarter of FY2026 will be critical for MRP Agro to demonstrate whether the Q3 revenue decline was a temporary aberration or signals a more fundamental business challenge. Management's ability to restore revenue momentum whilst maintaining the improved margin profile will determine whether the stock can regain investor confidence.

POSITIVE CATALYSTS

  • Q4 FY26 revenue recovery above ₹20 crores demonstrating business resilience
  • Sustained operating margins above 15% validating improved business mix
  • Positive operating cash flow generation indicating working capital normalisation
  • Institutional investor entry providing validation and liquidity
  • New contract wins or geographic expansion announcements

RED FLAGS TO MONITOR

  • Further sequential revenue decline in Q4 FY26 indicating structural demand issues
  • Margin compression back below 10% suggesting unsustainable Q3 improvements
  • Continued negative operating cash flow indicating persistent working capital challenges
  • Additional promoter stake reduction signalling lack of confidence
  • Stock breaking below ₹84.35 (52-week low) on high volumes

For the stock to merit reconsideration, investors would need to see at least two consecutive quarters of revenue stability above ₹20 crores combined with sustained margins above 12-15% and positive operating cash flow generation. Until such evidence emerges, the risk-reward profile remains unfavourable despite attractive valuation multiples.

The Verdict: Execution Concerns Outweigh Valuation Appeal

SELL

Score: 34/100

For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions until the company demonstrates at least two consecutive quarters of revenue stability and positive operating cash flow. The Q3 FY26 revenue decline of 41.69% raises serious questions about business sustainability that attractive valuations alone cannot offset.

For Existing Holders: Consider reducing positions or exiting entirely, particularly if holdings represent a significant portfolio allocation. The combination of negative financial trends, promoter stake reduction, and poor stock performance suggests risk-reward has turned unfavourable. Use any relief rallies towards ₹100-105 levels as exit opportunities.

Key Rationale: Whilst MRP Agro trades at attractive multiples (P/E 15x, P/BV 3.04x) and maintains zero debt, the sharp Q3 revenue decline, negative operating cash flow, and lack of institutional interest create an unfavourable risk-reward profile. The commodities trading business model's inherent volatility, combined with recent execution challenges and promoter stake reduction, outweighs valuation appeal. The stock's 35% decline over the past year and mildly bearish technical trend suggest further downside risk before a sustainable bottom is established.

Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)

⚠️ Investment Disclaimer

This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investments in micro-cap stocks carry substantial risks including limited liquidity, high volatility, and potential loss of capital.

{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News
Why is MRP Agro Ltd falling/rising?
Feb 04 2026 01:24 AM IST
share
Share Via
MRP Agro Ltd is Rated Sell by MarketsMOJO
Jan 29 2026 10:10 AM IST
share
Share Via
MRP Agro Ltd is Rated Sell
Jan 06 2026 10:11 AM IST
share
Share Via
MRP Agro Ltd is Rated Sell
Dec 25 2025 03:12 PM IST
share
Share Via
How has been the historical performance of MRP Agro?
Nov 09 2025 10:49 PM IST
share
Share Via
Are MRP Agro latest results good or bad?
Nov 09 2025 07:16 PM IST
share
Share Via