NACL Industries Q2 FY26: Profit Plunge Amid Margin Pressures Despite Revenue Stability

Oct 24 2025 07:30 PM IST
share
Share Via
NACL Industries Ltd., a small-cap pesticides and agrochemicals manufacturer with a market capitalisation of ₹4,370 crores, reported deeply concerning Q2 FY26 results that exposed severe profitability challenges despite maintaining revenue stability. Net profit for the quarter ending September 2025 collapsed by 82.66% year-on-year to just ₹2.55 crores, whilst declining 80.68% sequentially from ₹13.20 crores in Q1 FY26. The stock traded at ₹207.75 on 24 October 2025, down 4.02% on the day, reflecting investor disappointment with the company's deteriorating earnings quality.



The results paint a troubling picture for a company that has struggled to maintain consistent profitability across recent quarters. Whilst revenue showed marginal sequential growth of 1.91% to ₹456.94 crores and a modest 3.78% year-on-year increase, the company's inability to translate this into bottom-line growth raises serious questions about operational efficiency and cost management.





Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

₹2.55 Cr

▼ 82.66% YoY



Revenue (Q2 FY26)

₹456.94 Cr

▲ 3.78% YoY



Operating Margin

9.79%

▲ 53 bps YoY



PAT Margin

0.56%

▼ 278 bps YoY




The disconnect between operating performance and net profitability represents the core challenge facing NACL Industries. Whilst the company managed to improve its operating margin (excluding other income) to 9.79% from 9.26% a year earlier, profit after tax margin collapsed to a mere 0.56% from 3.34% in Q2 FY25. This dramatic compression suggests significant challenges at the interest and tax levels that are overwhelming operational improvements.



Financial Performance: Revenue Growth Masks Profitability Crisis



NACL Industries' Q2 FY26 revenue of ₹456.94 crores represented a marginal 1.91% sequential increase from ₹448.36 crores in Q1 FY26, demonstrating relative stability in the company's top-line performance. The 3.78% year-on-year growth, whilst modest, compares favourably to the company's challenging FY25 performance when annual sales declined by 30.6% to ₹1,234 crores.



However, this revenue stability completely failed to translate into earnings growth. Operating profit (PBDIT excluding other income) stood at ₹44.73 crores in Q2 FY26, yielding a margin of 9.79%—a 53 basis point improvement year-on-year but insufficient to offset pressures further down the income statement. The company's gross profit margin of 3.10% in Q2 FY26, whilst improved from the disastrous negative margins seen in FY25, remains concerningly thin for sustainable operations.

























































Metric Q2 FY26 Q1 FY26 Q2 FY25 QoQ Change YoY Change
Net Sales ₹456.94 Cr ₹448.36 Cr ₹440.31 Cr +1.91% +3.78%
Operating Profit ₹44.73 Cr ₹38.14 Cr ₹40.78 Cr +17.27% +9.69%
Net Profit ₹2.55 Cr ₹13.20 Cr ₹14.71 Cr -80.68% -82.66%
Operating Margin 9.79% 8.51% 9.26% +128 bps +53 bps
PAT Margin 0.56% 2.94% 3.34% -238 bps -278 bps



The most alarming aspect of Q2 FY26 results lies in the company's tax charge. Despite reporting a modest profit before tax of ₹6.45 crores, NACL Industries paid taxes of ₹3.90 crores—representing an effective tax rate of 60.47%. This extraordinarily high rate, compared to 27.23% in Q1 FY26 and 26.60% in Q2 FY25, suggests potential issues with tax credits, carry-forward losses, or one-time adjustments that are not immediately apparent from the standalone quarterly data.




⚠️ Critical Profitability Warning


Effective Tax Rate Anomaly: The 60.47% effective tax rate in Q2 FY26 is more than double the company's historical average of approximately 21-27%. This abnormally high rate consumed nearly 61% of pre-tax profits, leaving minimal earnings for shareholders. Without clarity on whether this represents a one-time adjustment or a structural issue, investors face significant uncertainty about future profitability.




Quarterly Trend Analysis: Persistent Volatility Undermines Confidence



Examining NACL Industries' performance across the past twelve quarters reveals a troubling pattern of extreme volatility that makes the company's earnings trajectory virtually impossible to predict with confidence. The company has oscillated between profitable and loss-making quarters with alarming frequency, undermining any sense of operational stability.








































































Quarter Revenue (₹ Cr) Net Profit (₹ Cr) Operating Margin PAT Margin
Sep'25 456.94 2.55 9.79% 0.56%
Jun'25 448.36 13.20 8.51% 2.94%
Mar'25 201.43 -50.27 -36.67% -24.96%
Dec'24 267.77 -36.75 -9.75% -13.72%
Sep'24 440.31 14.71 9.26% 3.34%
Jun'24 325.01 -20.15 -1.13% -6.20%
Mar'24 457.16 -9.36 2.38% -2.05%
Dec'23 365.40 -15.83 1.14% -4.33%



The data reveals that NACL Industries reported losses in four of the eight quarters shown, with particularly severe losses in Q4 FY25 (₹-50.27 crores) and Q3 FY25 (₹-36.75 crores). Even during profitable quarters, margins remain wafer-thin. The company's operating margin has ranged from a disastrous -36.67% to a modest 9.79%, whilst PAT margins have swung from -24.96% to 3.34%. This volatility suggests fundamental challenges in managing costs relative to revenue cycles in the agrochemicals sector.



Operational Challenges: Debt Burden and Capital Efficiency Concerns



Beyond immediate quarterly results, NACL Industries faces structural challenges that constrain its ability to generate consistent returns. The company's Return on Equity (ROE) averaged just 8.75% over the past five years—a mediocre performance that barely exceeds the cost of capital for most investors. More concerning, the company reported a negative ROE of -28.42% in the most recent annual period, reflecting the substantial losses incurred during FY25.



The company's balance sheet reveals a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.90 as of March 2025, indicating moderate leverage. However, with total debt of ₹396 crores and net debt of ₹337 crores, the company's interest burden remains substantial. Interest expenses of ₹13.08 crores in Q2 FY26, whilst down from ₹17.24 crores a year earlier, still consumed a significant portion of operating profits. The company's interest coverage ratio of just 1.78 times on average provides minimal cushion for any deterioration in operating performance.




Capital Efficiency Metrics Reveal Structural Weaknesses


NACL Industries' Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) averaged just 7.83% over five years—barely adequate for a manufacturing business in the agrochemicals sector. The company's sales-to-capital-employed ratio of 1.64 times suggests moderate asset utilisation, but the inability to convert this into higher returns indicates either pricing pressures, cost inefficiencies, or both. With a debt-to-EBITDA ratio averaging 7.55 times, the company operates with elevated financial risk that leaves little margin for error.




The company's cash flow profile provides some comfort despite weak profitability. Operating cash flow for FY25 surged to ₹468 crores—the highest in the company's recent history—driven primarily by working capital release of ₹481 crores. However, this improvement largely reflects inventory liquidation and receivables collection rather than underlying business strength. With closing cash of ₹57 crores as of March 2025, the company maintains adequate liquidity, though this represents only about 14% of total debt.



Industry Context: Agrochemicals Sector Faces Headwinds



NACL Industries operates in the challenging pesticides and agrochemicals sector, which has faced significant headwinds over the past two years. The sector experienced inventory destocking, pricing pressures from Chinese competition, and erratic monsoon patterns affecting farmer purchasing behaviour. The company's 30.6% revenue decline in FY25 reflected these broader industry challenges, though peers showed varying degrees of resilience.



The recent stabilisation in quarterly revenue suggests the worst of the destocking cycle may be behind the industry. However, margin pressures persist as raw material costs remain elevated whilst pricing power remains constrained. The company's inability to expand PAT margins despite improving operating margins suggests it is absorbing costs that competitors may be passing through more effectively.




⚠️ Sector Positioning Concerns


Competitive Disadvantage: NACL Industries' operating margin of 9.79% in Q2 FY26, whilst improved, remains at the lower end of the agrochemicals sector range. Larger peers typically operate with EBITDA margins of 12-18%, suggesting NACL faces either unfavourable product mix, weaker pricing power, or higher cost structures. The company's small-cap status (₹4,370 crore market cap) may limit its ability to negotiate favourable terms with suppliers or customers compared to larger competitors.




Peer Comparison: Valuation Premium Unjustified by Fundamentals



A comparison with sector peers reveals that NACL Industries trades at a significant valuation premium despite demonstrably weaker fundamentals. The company's Price-to-Book Value ratio of 10.21 times stands out as exceptionally high compared to peers, particularly given its negative Return on Equity.

























































Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE (%) Debt/Equity Div Yield
NACL Industries NA (Loss Making) 10.21x -28.42% 0.79 0.00%
Bharat Rasayan 32.65x 4.29x 12.47% -0.18 0.01%
India Pesticides 22.37x 2.46x 9.26% -0.05 0.39%
Rallis India 32.00x 0.27x 0.83% -0.21 0.89%
Bhagiradha Chem 268.10x 4.77x 2.03% 0.09 0.06%



The comparison reveals several concerning aspects of NACL's valuation. Whilst the company cannot be assigned a meaningful P/E ratio due to losses on a trailing twelve-month basis, its P/BV multiple of 10.21 times vastly exceeds peers despite negative ROE. Bharat Rasayan, with positive 12.47% ROE, trades at just 4.29 times book value. India Pesticides, with 9.26% ROE, commands only 2.46 times book value. This valuation disconnect suggests NACL's current market price reflects speculative positioning rather than fundamental value.



The company's zero dividend yield further distinguishes it from peers like Rallis India (0.89%) and India Pesticides (0.39%), eliminating any income component from the investment proposition. With negative earnings, no dividends, and a premium valuation, NACL Industries offers investors purely a capital appreciation bet on a turnaround that has yet to materialise convincingly.



Valuation Analysis: Premium Pricing for Subpar Performance



At the current market price of ₹207.75, NACL Industries commands a market capitalisation of ₹4,370 crores, representing a Price-to-Book Value multiple of 9.80 times based on a book value per share of ₹21.23. This valuation appears stretched given the company's fundamental challenges and recent loss-making history.



The stock has delivered extraordinary returns over longer periods—a 293.24% gain over one year and 458.47% over five years—vastly outperforming both the Sensex and the broader agrochemicals sector. However, these returns appear disconnected from underlying business performance, which has deteriorated significantly. The stock's current price of ₹207.75 represents a 38.47% decline from its 52-week high of ₹337.65 reached earlier in 2025, suggesting momentum investors have already begun exiting positions.


































Valuation Metric Current Value Assessment
P/E Ratio (TTM) NA (Loss Making) Not Meaningful
Price to Book Value 9.80x Highly Expensive
EV/Sales 3.33x Moderate Premium
Market Cap ₹4,370 Cr Small Cap



The company's valuation grade has deteriorated progressively over the past year. Originally rated "Attractive" in late 2024, it was downgraded to "Fair" in December 2024 at ₹53.17, and further downgraded to "Risky" in February 2025 at ₹59.45. Despite the stock subsequently rallying to current levels, the fundamental deterioration justifies an even more cautious stance. Based on historical P/BV multiples for loss-making agrochemical companies (typically 1-3 times book value), a fair value estimate would place NACL Industries closer to ₹60-90 per share, suggesting significant downside risk from current levels.



Shareholding Pattern: Institutional Exodus Signals Concern



The shareholding pattern reveals a concerning trend of institutional divestment that began in mid-2024 and has accelerated through 2025. Mutual fund holdings, which stood at 0.89% in June 2024, have been completely liquidated, reaching 0.00% by September 2024 and remaining absent through June 2025. This represents a complete loss of confidence from domestic mutual fund managers who typically conduct rigorous fundamental analysis.

























































Shareholder Category Jun'25 Mar'25 Dec'24 Sep'24 Jun'24
Promoter 63.08% 63.08% 63.65% 63.65% 63.65%
FII 0.03% 0.12% 0.17% 0.18% 0.31%
Mutual Funds 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.89%
Other DII 1.74% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Non-Institutional 35.15% 36.80% 36.18% 36.16% 35.15%



Foreign Institutional Investors have similarly reduced their stake from 0.31% in June 2024 to just 0.03% by June 2025—a 90% reduction in holdings. The only positive development has been the entry of Other Domestic Institutional Investors (DIIs) with a 1.74% stake in June 2025, though this modest position hardly compensates for the exodus of mutual funds and FIIs.



Promoter holding has remained relatively stable around 63%, with a minor reduction from 63.65% to 63.08% between December 2024 and June 2025. Importantly, there is no promoter pledging, which eliminates one potential risk factor. However, the promoters' decision not to increase their stake during the company's recent challenges raises questions about their confidence in the near-term outlook. The non-institutional shareholding base of 35.15% consists primarily of retail investors (39,263 shareholders as of June 2025), suggesting a shareholder base that may lack the sophistication to properly assess the company's fundamental challenges.



Stock Performance: Momentum Reversal After Extraordinary Rally



NACL Industries' stock performance over the past year presents a study in extreme volatility and momentum-driven trading. The stock delivered a remarkable 293.24% return over one year and an astounding 458.47% over five years, vastly outperforming the Sensex's 5.18% and 106.98% returns over the same periods. This generated alpha of 288.06% and 351.49% respectively, making NACL one of the top-performing stocks in the small-cap universe during this period.































































Period NACL Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week +4.45% +0.31% +4.14%
1 Month -5.46% +3.05% -8.51%
3 Months -29.58% +2.47% -32.05%
6 Months +9.78% +5.53% +4.25%
YTD +211.28% +7.77% +203.51%
1 Year +293.24% +5.18% +288.06%
3 Years +163.47% +40.75% +122.72%
5 Years +458.47% +106.98% +351.49%



However, recent performance tells a starkly different story. The stock has declined 29.58% over the past three months and 5.46% over one month, significantly underperforming the Sensex which gained 2.47% and 3.05% respectively during these periods. This represents a complete reversal of the momentum that drove the extraordinary gains earlier in the year. The stock's high beta of 1.35 means it tends to amplify market movements, making it particularly vulnerable during downturns.



The technical picture has deteriorated correspondingly. The stock trades below its 20-day moving average (₹209.08), 50-day moving average (₹239.85), and 100-day moving average (₹239.91), though it remains above its 200-day moving average (₹176.85). The overall technical trend has been downgraded to "Mildly Bullish" since 12 August 2025, with multiple indicators including MACD, Bollinger Bands, and OBV showing bearish signals on weekly timeframes. The stock's decline from its 52-week high of ₹337.65 to the current ₹207.75 represents a 38.47% correction, suggesting the speculative premium that drove earlier gains has largely evaporated.




"The disconnect between NACL Industries' extraordinary stock returns and deteriorating fundamental performance represents one of the most striking examples of momentum-driven mispricing in the small-cap space—a gap that recent price action suggests is finally closing."


Quality Assessment: Below Average Grade Reflects Structural Weaknesses



NACL Industries carries a "Below Average" quality grade, a designation it has held for two consecutive quarters since March 2025. This assessment reflects multiple fundamental weaknesses that constrain the company's ability to generate consistent, high-quality returns for shareholders.



The company's five-year sales growth of just 4.90% ranks poorly for a company in a sector that should benefit from India's agricultural growth trajectory. More concerning, five-year EBIT growth data is unavailable, likely reflecting the company's inconsistent profitability that makes trend analysis meaningless. The average Return on Equity of 8.75% and Return on Capital Employed of 7.83% both fall well below thresholds typically associated with quality businesses, which generally target ROE above 15% and ROCE above 12%.





✅ KEY STRENGTHS



  • Zero promoter pledging eliminates governance risk

  • Improved operating cash flow (₹468 Cr in FY25)

  • Operating margins stabilising around 9-10%

  • Revenue showing sequential growth stability

  • Adequate liquidity with ₹57 Cr cash

  • Moderate debt-to-equity ratio of 0.90

  • Strong brand presence in niche agrochemical segments




⚠️ KEY CONCERNS



  • Persistent quarterly losses undermining shareholder value

  • Abnormally high tax rate (60.47%) in Q2 FY26

  • Negative ROE of -28.42% for recent annual period

  • Extremely thin PAT margins (0.56% in Q2 FY26)

  • Complete mutual fund exodus signals institutional concern

  • Valuation premium (10.21x P/BV) unjustified by fundamentals

  • High volatility (69.07%) creates significant risk

  • Weak interest coverage ratio of 1.78x

  • High debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 7.55x





The company's debt metrics present a mixed picture. Whilst the debt-to-equity ratio of 0.90 appears moderate, the debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 7.55 times is elevated and leaves little room for error. The interest coverage ratio of just 1.78 times means operating profits barely cover interest expenses, creating vulnerability to any further deterioration in operating performance. The company's tax ratio of 21.44% on average appears reasonable, though the recent quarter's 60.47% rate raises serious questions.



On a positive note, the company maintains zero promoter pledging, eliminating one common risk factor in small-cap stocks. However, institutional holdings of just 1.77% reflect minimal confidence from sophisticated investors who typically conduct rigorous due diligence. The absence of dividend payments further reduces the company's appeal to income-focused investors.



Outlook: Monitoring Points and Red Flags



Looking ahead, NACL Industries faces a critical period where it must demonstrate the ability to translate revenue stability into consistent profitability. The company's financial trend is currently classified as "Flat," suggesting neither clear improvement nor deterioration, but this neutral assessment masks significant underlying concerns that require close monitoring.





POSITIVE CATALYSTS TO WATCH



  • Normalisation of tax rate to historical 22-27% range

  • Sustained operating margin improvement above 10%

  • Return to consistent quarterly profitability

  • Working capital management improvements

  • Re-entry of institutional investors (MFs, FIIs)




RED FLAGS TO MONITOR



  • Further deterioration in PAT margins below 1%

  • Continued high effective tax rates above 40%

  • Return to quarterly losses in upcoming results

  • Increase in debt levels or deteriorating interest coverage

  • Additional institutional investor exits

  • Promoter stake reduction or pledge initiation

  • Technical breakdown below 200-day MA (₹176.85)





The immediate focus for investors should be on the company's ability to explain and resolve the abnormally high tax rate seen in Q2 FY26. If this represents a structural issue rather than a one-time adjustment, it would fundamentally alter the investment thesis by permanently reducing net profitability. Management commentary on this issue will be critical when available.



Additionally, the company's ability to maintain operating margins around 9-10% whilst expanding PAT margins will determine whether the business can generate acceptable returns on the capital employed. The current 0.56% PAT margin is simply unsustainable for any business hoping to reward shareholders adequately. A return to the 3-4% PAT margins seen in profitable quarters of 2023-24 would represent significant improvement, though even these levels remain modest by sector standards.




The Verdict: Avoid Until Clear Turnaround Evidence Emerges


SELL

Score: 39/100


For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions at current levels. The stock trades at a significant premium (9.80x P/BV) despite negative ROE, persistent losses, and institutional exodus. Wait for at least three consecutive quarters of improved profitability with PAT margins above 3% before considering entry. Fair value estimate of ₹60-90 per share suggests substantial downside risk from current ₹207.75.


For Existing Holders: Consider reducing positions, particularly for those sitting on substantial gains from the stock's extraordinary rally. The fundamental deterioration evident in recent results, combined with technical weakness and institutional selling, suggests the risk-reward has turned decisively unfavourable. Retain only if willing to accept high volatility and potential for further 30-40% downside.


Fair Value Estimate: ₹60-90 per share (57-71% downside from current levels)


Rationale: The SELL rating reflects the stark disconnect between NACL Industries' premium valuation and its deteriorating fundamental performance. Whilst the company has achieved revenue stability, its inability to convert this into meaningful bottom-line growth—evidenced by the 82.66% YoY profit decline and razor-thin 0.56% PAT margin—raises serious questions about the sustainability of the business model. The abnormally high 60.47% tax rate in Q2 FY26 further clouds the outlook. The complete exit of mutual funds, ongoing FII selling, and technical deterioration all point to a stock where speculative momentum has run its course. Until the company demonstrates at least three consecutive quarters of improving profitability with PAT margins above 3%, the current valuation cannot be justified on any reasonable fundamental basis.





⚠️ Investment Disclaimer


This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.





{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News