New Light Industries Q2 FY26: Revenue Collapse Signals Deepening Operational Crisis

Nov 15 2025 10:53 AM IST
share
Share Via
New Light Industries Ltd., a micro-cap trading and distribution company with a market capitalisation of ₹15.00 crores, reported deeply concerning results for Q2 FY26, with net profit plunging 85.19% quarter-on-quarter to ₹0.04 crores from ₹0.27 crores in Q1 FY26. The year-on-year comparison reveals an 88.24% decline from ₹0.34 crores in Q2 FY25, highlighting a severe deterioration in operational performance that has left investors questioning the company's viability.





Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

₹0.04 Cr

↓ 85.19% QoQ



Revenue (Q2 FY26)

₹1.29 Cr

↓ 59.43% QoQ



Operating Margin

3.10%

↓ 578 bps QoQ



PAT Margin

3.10%

↓ 539 bps QoQ




The stock, currently trading at ₹1.70, has witnessed a catastrophic 86.20% decline over the past year, significantly underperforming its sector benchmark by 89.44 percentage points. With the company's technical indicators flashing "mildly bearish" signals and financial trends firmly in "negative" territory, the investment case has deteriorated substantially. The company's proprietary Mojo score of 20 out of 100 places it firmly in "Strong Sell" territory, reflecting the confluence of operational challenges, weak financial performance, and unfavourable market sentiment.















































































Quarter Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 Dec'24 Sep'24 Jun'24 Mar'24
Net Sales (₹ Cr) 1.29 3.18 3.37 7.73 5.42 0.72 5.88
QoQ Growth -59.43% -5.64% -56.40% +42.62% +652.78% -87.76%
YoY Growth -76.20% +341.67% -42.69%
Net Profit (₹ Cr) 0.04 0.27 0.22 0.55 0.34 0.03 0.38
Operating Margin 3.10% 8.81% 2.97% 7.24% 6.46% 5.56% 4.59%
PAT Margin 3.10% 8.49% 6.53% 7.12% 6.27% 4.17% 6.46%



Financial Performance: A Quarter of Alarming Deterioration



New Light Industries' Q2 FY26 results revealed a business in severe distress. Net sales collapsed 59.43% quarter-on-quarter to ₹1.29 crores from ₹3.18 crores in Q1 FY26, marking the lowest quarterly revenue since Jun'24. The year-on-year comparison is equally troubling, with sales declining 76.20% from ₹5.42 crores in Q2 FY25. This dramatic revenue contraction suggests fundamental issues in order execution, customer retention, or market demand that extend beyond normal business cyclicality.



Profitability metrics paint an even grimmer picture. Operating profit (PBDIT excluding other income) fell to ₹0.04 crores in Q2 FY26, representing the lowest level recorded in the available quarterly data. Operating margin compressed to 3.10%, down from 8.81% in the previous quarter and below the 6.46% achieved in Q2 FY25. This margin deterioration indicates that the company is not only facing revenue challenges but also struggling with cost management and operational efficiency.



Net profit of ₹0.04 crores in Q2 FY26 represents an 85.19% sequential decline and an 88.24% year-on-year drop. The PAT margin of 3.10%, whilst matching the operating margin due to minimal interest and depreciation charges, reflects the company's inability to generate meaningful profitability from its operations. The tax rate of 0.00% across multiple quarters raises questions about the company's profitability structure and potential tax loss carry-forwards.





Revenue (Q2 FY26)

₹1.29 Cr

↓ 59.43% QoQ | ↓ 76.20% YoY



Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

₹0.04 Cr

↓ 85.19% QoQ | ↓ 88.24% YoY



Operating Margin

3.10%

↓ 571 bps QoQ



PAT Margin

3.10%

↓ 539 bps QoQ




Operational Challenges: Weak Returns and Balance Sheet Concerns



The company's operational efficiency metrics reveal deep-seated structural issues. Return on Equity (ROE) averaged a weak 3.91% over the measurement period, with the latest reading at 7.51% – significantly below industry standards for profitable, well-managed companies. Even more concerning is the average Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) of -4.91%, indicating that the company has historically destroyed value rather than creating it for stakeholders. Whilst the latest ROCE improved to 7.16%, this remains inadequate for a sustainable business model.



The balance sheet structure reveals interesting dynamics. Shareholder funds increased substantially to ₹14.39 crores in FY25 from ₹3.30 crores in FY24, driven primarily by a sharp rise in share capital from ₹2.20 crores to ₹8.76 crores. This capital infusion appears to have been necessitated by operational challenges rather than growth investments. Reserves and surplus turned positive at ₹5.63 crores in FY25 from negative ₹0.11 crores in FY24, suggesting accumulated losses have been addressed through capital restructuring.



The company maintains minimal debt with long-term borrowings of just ₹0.06 crores as of Mar'25, making it essentially a net cash company with a debt-to-equity ratio of -0.02. Whilst this provides financial flexibility, it also highlights that the company's operational challenges cannot be attributed to excessive leverage. Current assets stood at ₹14.56 crores against current liabilities of ₹0.60 crores, providing comfortable liquidity. However, the cash flow statement reveals concerning trends, with operating cash flow turning negative at ₹-7.00 crores in FY25, driven by adverse working capital movements of ₹-8.00 crores.




Critical Operational Red Flags


Weak Capital Efficiency: Average ROCE of -4.91% indicates value destruction over time. Latest ROCE of 7.16% remains inadequate for sustainable operations.


Negative Operating Cash Flow: FY25 operating cash flow of ₹-7.00 crores driven by ₹-8.00 crores adverse working capital movement signals serious operational stress.


Deteriorating Receivables: Debtors turnover ratio fell to lowest level of 1.83 times in H1 FY26, indicating collection challenges and potential quality concerns.




Industry Context: Severe Underperformance Against Peers



New Light Industries operates in the competitive trading and distribution sector, where operational efficiency and working capital management are critical success factors. The company's performance over the past year has been catastrophic relative to both its peer group and broader market indices. The stock's 86.20% decline over 12 months stands in stark contrast to the Trading & Distributors sector's 3.24% gain, resulting in underperformance of 89.44 percentage points.



The broader market context makes this underperformance even more pronounced. Whilst the Sensex delivered a respectable 9.00% return over the same period, New Light Industries destroyed shareholder value at an alarming rate. The stock's negative alpha of -95.20% over one year quantifies the magnitude of this value destruction. Even over longer timeframes, the pattern persists – the three-year return of 19.72% significantly lags the Sensex's 37.22% gain, whilst the five-year return of -40.35% contrasts sharply with the Sensex's 93.78% appreciation.



The company's risk-adjusted returns paint an equally troubling picture. With a volatility of 67.64% over the past year – more than five times the Sensex's 12.26% volatility – and a risk-adjusted return of -1.27, the stock falls firmly into the "high risk, low return" category. The beta of 1.50 indicates higher volatility than the market, yet this elevated risk has not been compensated with commensurate returns. For investors, this represents the worst possible combination: elevated risk without reward.

























































Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE (%) Debt/Equity Div Yield
New Light Industries 13.79 1.03 3.91% -0.02 NA
Mihika Industries NA (Loss Making) 0.73 0.94% 0.01 NA
Yash Mgmt & Sat. NA (Loss Making) 0.76 1.49% 0.15 NA
Ganon Products 87.99 1.36 1.14% 0.00 NA
Muller & Phipps 175.00 -9.79 0.00% -0.51 NA



Relative to its peer group, New Light Industries presents a mixed valuation picture. Its P/E ratio of 13.79x appears reasonable compared to peers like Ganon Products (87.99x) and Muller & Phipps (175.00x), though two peers are loss-making and trade without meaningful P/E multiples. The company's ROE of 3.91%, whilst weak in absolute terms, exceeds most peers in the comparison set. However, this marginal relative advantage provides little comfort given the absolute deterioration in operational performance and the company's inability to generate consistent profitability.



Valuation Analysis: Attractive Multiples Mask Fundamental Deterioration



New Light Industries' current valuation metrics present a paradox: attractive multiples that belie deteriorating fundamentals. At ₹1.70 per share, the stock trades at a P/E ratio of 13.79x based on trailing twelve-month earnings, significantly below the industry average P/E of 23x. The Price-to-Book ratio of 1.03x suggests the stock trades near book value of ₹1.64 per share, providing limited downside protection given the company's weak return profile.



Enterprise value metrics tell a similar story. The EV/EBITDA multiple of 14.61x and EV/Sales ratio of 0.94x appear reasonable on the surface. However, these multiples must be viewed in the context of rapidly deteriorating operational performance and negative financial trends. The company's proprietary valuation grade of "Very Attractive" reflects the statistical cheapness of the stock, but this rating fails to capture the fundamental challenges that have driven the valuation down to these levels.



The stock's 52-week range of ₹1.44 to ₹14.12 illustrates the dramatic value destruction over the past year. Currently trading just 18.06% above its 52-week low and 87.96% below its 52-week high, the stock has become a classic "value trap" – appearing cheap on traditional metrics whilst fundamental deterioration continues unabated. The PEG ratio of 0.55x suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate, but this metric loses relevance when growth itself has turned sharply negative.





P/E Ratio (TTM)

13.79x

vs Industry: 23x



Price to Book

1.03x

Book Value: ₹1.64



EV/EBITDA

14.61x

EV/Sales: 0.94x



Mojo Score

20/100

Strong Sell




Shareholding: Minimal Institutional Interest Signals Lack of Confidence



The shareholding pattern of New Light Industries reveals a concerning absence of institutional participation, which typically serves as a quality signal for small-cap companies. Promoter holding stands at just 5.08% as of Sep'25, unchanged over the past three quarters but down from 5.69% in Sep'24. This extraordinarily low promoter stake raises governance concerns and questions about management's confidence in the business.



Institutional participation is virtually non-existent. Foreign Institutional Investors (FII) holding dropped to 0.00% in Dec'24 from 1.10% in Sep'24 and has remained at zero since. Mutual funds, insurance companies, and other domestic institutional investors maintain zero holdings, reflecting a complete lack of professional investor interest. The non-institutional category accounts for 94.92% of shareholding, indicating a predominantly retail investor base with limited analytical resources.

































































Category Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 Dec'24 Sep'24
Promoter 5.08% 5.08% 5.08% 5.08% 5.69%
FII 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1.10%
Mutual Funds 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Insurance 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Other DII 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Non-Institutional 94.92% 94.92% 94.92% 94.92% 93.21%



The exit of FII investors in Dec'24, coinciding with the promoter stake reduction in the same quarter, suggests coordinated selling pressure from informed investors who likely anticipated the operational deterioration that has since materialised. The absence of any institutional buying despite the stock's dramatic decline and "attractive" valuation multiples speaks volumes about professional investors' assessment of the company's prospects. This lack of institutional support leaves the stock vulnerable to further volatility and limits potential recovery catalysts.



Stock Performance: Catastrophic Value Destruction Across All Timeframes



New Light Industries' stock performance has been nothing short of disastrous across virtually all measurement periods. The one-year return of -86.20% represents severe wealth destruction, with the stock underperforming the Sensex by a staggering 95.20 percentage points. Even on shorter timeframes, the underperformance persists: the stock declined 17.48% over one month versus the Sensex's 3.09% gain, and fell 5.03% over one week against the Sensex's 1.62% rise.



The six-month return of -38.18% highlights the acceleration of the decline in recent months, coinciding with the deteriorating quarterly results. The three-month decline of 6.08% appears modest in comparison but still underperformed the Sensex by 11.00 percentage points. Longer-term returns provide little solace: the two-year return of -9.96% and five-year return of -40.35% demonstrate that value destruction has been a persistent feature, not a recent aberration.































































Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week -5.03% 1.62% -6.65%
1 Month -17.48% 3.09% -20.57%
3 Months -6.08% 4.92% -11.00%
6 Months -38.18% 3.97% -42.15%
1 Year -86.20% 9.00% -95.20%
2 Years -9.96% 30.23% -40.19%
3 Years 19.72% 37.22% -17.50%
5 Years -40.35% 93.78% -134.13%



Technical indicators provide no comfort for investors hoping for a reversal. The stock remains in a "mildly bearish" trend as of the latest assessment, having oscillated between bearish and mildly bearish designations since late September. Moving averages paint a uniformly negative picture, with the stock trading below its 5-day (₹1.70), 20-day (₹1.74), 50-day (₹1.75), and 100-day (₹1.80) moving averages. The MACD shows mixed signals (mildly bullish weekly, bearish monthly), whilst Bollinger Bands indicate bearish conditions across both weekly and monthly timeframes.



Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags Overwhelm Limited Positives



The investment thesis for New Light Industries is overwhelmingly negative, with fundamental, technical, and valuation concerns converging to create a highly unfavourable risk-reward profile. The company's Mojo score of 20 out of 100 places it firmly in "Strong Sell" territory, reflecting the confluence of deteriorating financials, weak quality metrics, and bearish technical trends.



Breaking down the Mojo parameters reveals the depth of the challenges. The financial trend is classified as "Negative," driven by the sharp revenue and profit declines in recent quarters. The quality grade of "Below Average" reflects weak return ratios (average ROCE of -4.91%, average ROE of 3.91%) and lack of institutional participation. The technical trend of "Mildly Bearish" confirms the downward price momentum. Only the valuation parameter shows as "Attractive," but this reflects statistical cheapness rather than genuine investment opportunity.





Valuation

Attractive

Very Attractive Grade



Quality

Below Average

Weak Fundamentals



Financial Trend

Negative

Deteriorating Results



Technical Trend

Mildly Bearish

Downward Momentum




Key Strengths & Risk Factors





KEY STRENGTHS



  • Debt-Free Balance Sheet: Minimal long-term debt of ₹0.06 crores and net cash position provide financial flexibility without leverage concerns.

  • Attractive Valuation Multiples: P/E of 13.79x and P/BV of 1.03x appear statistically cheap relative to historical levels and some peers.

  • Comfortable Liquidity: Current assets of ₹14.56 crores against current liabilities of ₹0.60 crores provide substantial working capital cushion.

  • No Promoter Pledging: Zero pledged shares eliminate concerns about forced selling or financial distress at promoter level.

  • Long-Term Growth Track Record: Five-year sales CAGR of 15.52% demonstrates historical ability to grow revenue, though recent trends have reversed sharply.




KEY CONCERNS



  • Severe Revenue Collapse: Q2 FY26 sales of ₹1.29 crores down 59.43% QoQ and 76.20% YoY signals fundamental business disruption.

  • Weak Capital Efficiency: Average ROCE of -4.91% and average ROE of 3.91% indicate poor returns on invested capital and shareholder equity.

  • Negative Operating Cash Flow: FY25 operating cash outflow of ₹-7.00 crores driven by adverse working capital movements raises sustainability concerns.

  • Minimal Promoter Stake: Promoter holding of just 5.08% raises governance concerns and suggests limited management confidence.

  • Zero Institutional Participation: Complete absence of FII, mutual fund, and insurance holdings indicates professional investors see no value.

  • Catastrophic Stock Performance: One-year decline of 86.20% with underperformance of 95.20 percentage points versus Sensex reflects severe value destruction.

  • Deteriorating Margins: Operating margin compression to 3.10% in Q2 FY26 from 8.81% in Q1 FY26 indicates operational stress beyond revenue decline.






"When a stock trades at 'attractive' valuations yet institutional investors remain completely absent, the market is sending a clear message: the cheapness reflects fundamental deterioration, not opportunity."


Outlook: What to Watch





POSITIVE CATALYSTS



  • Stabilisation of quarterly revenue above ₹3.00 crores for two consecutive quarters

  • Operating margin improvement back above 6.00% sustainable level

  • Positive operating cash flow generation for full fiscal year

  • Entry of institutional investors (FII or mutual fund participation)

  • Improvement in debtors turnover ratio above 3.0 times




RED FLAGS



  • Further sequential revenue decline in Q3 FY26 below ₹1.00 crore

  • Operating margin falling below 2.00% for consecutive quarters

  • Continued negative operating cash flow in FY26

  • Further reduction in promoter holding below 5.00%

  • Stock breaking below 52-week low of ₹1.44

  • Working capital deterioration requiring external funding






The Verdict: Exit Recommended


STRONG SELL

Score: 20/100


For Fresh Investors: Avoid completely. The confluence of collapsing revenues, weak profitability, negative cash flows, and absence of institutional interest creates an unfavourable risk-reward profile. Whilst valuation multiples appear attractive statistically, they represent a classic value trap where cheapness reflects deteriorating fundamentals rather than genuine opportunity.


For Existing Holders: Strongly consider exiting positions. The Q2 FY26 results represent a significant deterioration from already weak prior quarters, with no visible catalysts for reversal. The 86.20% decline over the past year has destroyed substantial wealth, and the negative financial trend suggests further downside risk. The minimal promoter stake of 5.08% and complete absence of institutional participation indicate that informed investors have already exited.


Fair Value Estimate: ₹1.20 (29.41% downside from current price of ₹1.70). This estimate reflects continued operational challenges, weak return profile, and high probability of further quarterly disappointments. The stock would need to demonstrate at least two consecutive quarters of revenue stabilisation above ₹3.00 crores and margin improvement before reassessment.





Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)





⚠️ Investment Disclaimer


This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.





{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News