Odyssey Corporation Q3 FY26: Profit Surge Masks Deepening Operational Weakness

Jan 30 2026 09:33 PM IST
share
Share Via
Odyssey Corporation Ltd., a Mumbai-based non-banking financial company, reported a consolidated net profit of ₹0.75 crores for Q3 FY26, marking a striking 525.00% year-on-year surge from ₹0.12 crores in Q3 FY25. However, this headline figure conceals a troubling operational reality: net sales plummeted 43.11% year-on-year to ₹7.89 crores, whilst the company recorded an operating loss (excluding other income) of ₹2.42 crores, representing a negative operating margin of 30.67%.
Odyssey Corporation Q3 FY26: Profit Surge Masks Deepening Operational Weakness



The micro-cap NBFC, with a market capitalisation of just ₹52.00 crores, saw its shares close at ₹6.84 on January 30, 2026, down 2.15% on the day. The stock has endured a brutal decline of 73.91% over the past year, underperforming the NBFC sector by a staggering 94.13 percentage points and trading 77.39% below its 52-week high of ₹30.25.





Consolidated Net Profit (Q3 FY26)

₹0.75 Cr

▲ 525.00% YoY



Net Sales (Q3 FY26)

₹7.89 Cr

▼ 43.11% YoY



Operating Margin (Excl OI)

-30.67%

Negative Territory



1-Year Stock Return

-73.91%

vs Sensex +7.18%




The quarter's profit growth, whilst impressive on paper, was driven almost entirely by non-operating income of ₹4.85 crores—a figure representing 212.72% of profit before tax. This reliance on other income to mask operational deficiencies raises serious questions about the sustainability of earnings quality and the company's core business model.



Financial Performance: Revenue Collapse Exposes Structural Weakness



Odyssey Corporation's Q3 FY26 results reveal a company in operational distress. Net sales of ₹7.89 crores fell 35.27% sequentially from Q2 FY26's ₹12.19 crores and crashed 43.11% year-on-year from ₹13.87 crores in Q3 FY25. This marks the third consecutive quarter of volatile revenue performance, with sales swinging wildly between ₹7.84 crores and ₹13.13 crores over the past year.



The company's operating profit before depreciation, interest, and tax—excluding other income—stood at a loss of ₹2.42 crores in Q3 FY26, compared to a marginal loss of ₹0.46 crores in the year-ago quarter. The operating margin deteriorated sharply to negative 30.67%, the worst performance in at least eight quarters, down from negative 3.32% in Q3 FY25.









































































Quarter Net Sales (₹ Cr) QoQ Change YoY Change Operating Margin (Excl OI) Consol. PAT (₹ Cr)
Dec'25 7.89 -35.27% -43.11% -30.67% 0.75
Sep'25 12.19 +55.48% +4253.57% -3.36% 0.43
Jun'25 7.84 -40.29% +639.62% 9.06% 0.57
Mar'25 13.13 -5.34% N/A -21.86% -0.30
Dec'24 13.87 +4853.57% N/A -3.32% 0.12
Sep'24 0.28 -73.58% N/A -14.29% 1.76
Jun'24 1.06 N/A N/A -42.45% 0.19



The profit after tax margin of 24.59% in Q3 FY26, whilst appearing healthy, is entirely attributable to other income. When stripped of non-operating gains, the business is fundamentally loss-making at the operational level. Employee costs remained modest at ₹0.26 crores, suggesting limited operational scale or staffing constraints that may hinder growth.




Critical Red Flag: Non-Operating Income Dependency


Other income of ₹4.85 crores in Q3 FY26 represented 212.72% of profit before tax, indicating the company's bottom line is entirely reliant on non-core activities rather than sustainable business operations. This raises serious concerns about earnings quality and the viability of the underlying NBFC business model.




Operational Challenges: Persistent Losses and Weak Return Metrics



Odyssey Corporation's return on equity (ROE) stands at a feeble 2.55% on average, with the latest ROE at just 0.48%—far below acceptable thresholds for a financial services company. This anaemic return profile reflects the company's inability to generate meaningful profits from shareholder capital, a critical weakness for any NBFC seeking to attract institutional investment.



The company's return on capital employed (ROCE) paints an even bleaker picture at negative 2.02%, indicating that the business is destroying value rather than creating it. With operating losses persisting across multiple quarters and no clear path to operational profitability, the fundamental strength of the enterprise remains highly questionable.



On the balance sheet front, shareholder funds stood at ₹169.03 crores as of March 2025, up from ₹84.97 crores in March 2024, primarily due to a significant increase in share capital from ₹19.70 crores to ₹37.52 crores. This equity dilution, whilst bolstering the balance sheet, raises questions about capital allocation and the company's ability to deploy funds profitably.




Balance Sheet Snapshot: Capital Infusion Without Operational Improvement


Shareholder funds doubled to ₹169.03 crores in FY25 from ₹84.97 crores in FY24, driven by equity capital expansion. However, this capital infusion has not translated into operational improvements, with the company continuing to report operating losses and negative ROCE. Current assets stood at ₹92.68 crores with current liabilities of ₹32.51 crores, providing adequate liquidity but no clear deployment strategy.




The Other Income Conundrum: Masking Core Business Failure



The most alarming aspect of Odyssey Corporation's financial profile is the overwhelming contribution of other income to reported profits. In Q3 FY26, other income of ₹4.85 crores dwarfed the operating loss of ₹2.42 crores, effectively subsidising the failing core business. This pattern has persisted across quarters, with other income consistently exceeding operating profits.



For FY25, the company reported total other income of ₹9.00 crores against an operating loss (excluding other income) of ₹3.00 crores, resulting in a modest net profit of ₹3.00 crores for the full year. This dependency on non-core income sources—likely comprising investment gains, dividend income, or asset sales—is unsustainable and masks the fundamental deterioration of the NBFC's lending or financing activities.

















































Period Net Sales (₹ Cr) Operating Profit Excl OI (₹ Cr) Other Income (₹ Cr) PAT (₹ Cr) PAT Margin
FY25 28.00 -3.00 9.00 3.00 10.7%
FY24 32.00 0.00 3.00 3.00 9.4%
FY23 74.00 -1.00 3.00 1.00 1.4%
FY22 100.00 1.00 4.00 6.00 6.0%



Peer Comparison: Trailing Sector on Key Metrics



When benchmarked against NBFC peers, Odyssey Corporation's underperformance becomes starkly evident. The company's ROE of 2.55% lags significantly behind peers such as Key Corp (36.88%) and even smaller players like Hiliks Technology (3.40%). Its price-to-book ratio of 0.30x, whilst appearing cheap, reflects market scepticism about the company's ability to generate sustainable returns.



















































Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE (%) Market Cap (₹ Cr)
Odyssey Corporation 62.60 0.30 2.55 52.00
Key Corp 55.53 0.71 36.88 N/A
Hiliks Technology 92.65 2.26 3.40 N/A
GACM Tech 6.29 0.55 5.15 N/A
Toyam Sports NA (Loss Making) 0.17 1.60 N/A



Despite its weak fundamentals, Odyssey Corporation trades at a P/E ratio of 62.60x—nearly three times the NBFC sector average of 22x. This valuation disconnect suggests the market is either pricing in unrealistic growth expectations or the stock is severely overvalued relative to its earnings quality and operational performance.



Valuation Analysis: Expensive Despite Operational Distress



At ₹6.84 per share, Odyssey Corporation carries a "Very Expensive" valuation grade, trading at 62.60 times trailing twelve-month earnings. The company's enterprise value to EBITDA stands at negative 20.24x, reflecting the negative operating performance. With a price-to-book ratio of just 0.30x against a book value of ₹22.05 per share, the stock appears to be a classic value trap—cheap on paper but fundamentally impaired.



The stock has oscillated between "Expensive" and "Very Expensive" valuation grades over the past several months, with no sustained improvement in underlying fundamentals to justify even the current depressed price levels. The absence of any dividend (last paid in September 2011) further diminishes the investment case for income-seeking investors.




"A P/E of 62.60x for a company with negative operating margins and 2.55% ROE represents one of the most extreme valuation disconnects in the NBFC space."


Shareholding Pattern: Stable but Uninspiring Institutional Interest



Promoter holding has remained static at 38.27% over the past five quarters, indicating no change in management confidence or stake. More concerning is the complete absence of institutional participation—foreign institutional investors, mutual funds, insurance companies, and other domestic institutional investors collectively hold 0.00% of the company.

























































Quarter Promoter (%) FII (%) MF (%) Insurance (%) Non-Institutional (%)
Dec'25 38.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 61.73
Sep'25 38.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 61.73
Jun'25 38.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 61.73
Mar'25 38.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 61.73
Dec'24 38.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 61.73



This zero institutional ownership is a glaring red flag, signalling that sophisticated investors have shunned the stock entirely. The 61.73% non-institutional shareholding comprises primarily retail investors, who may lack the analytical resources to properly assess the company's deteriorating fundamentals.



Stock Performance: Brutal Decline Across All Timeframes



Odyssey Corporation's share price performance has been catastrophic across virtually all timeframes. The stock has plunged 73.91% over the past year, compared to the Sensex's 7.18% gain—an underperformance of 81.09 percentage points. Over two years, the stock has declined 20.19% whilst the Sensex has rallied 15.65%, resulting in negative alpha of 35.84 percentage points.































































Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week +11.76% +0.90% +10.86%
1 Month -16.89% -2.84% -14.05%
3 Months -16.48% -2.53% -13.95%
6 Months -44.16% +0.97% -45.13%
YTD -11.28% -3.46% -7.82%
1 Year -73.91% +7.18% -81.09%
2 Years -20.19% +15.65% -35.84%
3 Years +4.11% +38.27% -34.16%



The stock's risk-adjusted return of negative 1.49 over the past year, coupled with volatility of 49.56%, places it firmly in the "High Risk Low Return" category. With a beta of 1.50, the stock is 50% more volatile than the broader market, amplifying downside risk during market corrections.



Technical indicators paint an equally grim picture. The stock is in a "Bearish" trend as of January 28, 2026, trading below all key moving averages—5-day (₹6.63), 20-day (₹7.15), 50-day (₹7.76), 100-day (₹8.46), and 200-day (₹11.34). The MACD shows mildly bullish signals on weekly charts but remains bearish on monthly timeframes, whilst RSI provides no clear directional signal.



Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags Outweigh Any Positives



Odyssey Corporation's investment thesis is fundamentally broken. The company exhibits a "Below Average" quality grade, reflecting weak long-term financial performance characterised by operating losses, anaemic ROE, and unsustainable reliance on other income. The financial trend is classified as "Flat" for Q3 FY26, masking the underlying operational deterioration.



The proprietary Mojo Score stands at a dismal 16 out of 100, firmly in "Strong Sell" territory. This score reflects the confluence of bearish technical trends, flat-to-negative financial performance, expensive valuation despite operational distress, and below-average quality metrics. The company has oscillated between "Sell" and "Strong Sell" ratings over the past year, with no sustained improvement in any parameter.





Key Strengths



  • Healthy long-term sales growth of 116.79% over five years

  • Low debt-to-equity ratio of 0.06, indicating minimal leverage

  • Adequate liquidity with current assets of ₹92.68 crores

  • Stable promoter holding at 38.27% with no pledging

  • Recent capital infusion strengthening balance sheet




Key Concerns



  • Operating losses of ₹2.42 crores in Q3 FY26 with negative 30.67% margin

  • Net sales declined 43.11% YoY to ₹7.89 crores

  • Other income (₹4.85 Cr) represents 212.72% of PBT—unsustainable

  • ROE of just 2.55% and negative ROCE of 2.02%

  • Zero institutional ownership signals lack of confidence

  • Stock down 73.91% over one year with bearish technical trend

  • Expensive valuation at 62.60x P/E despite operational distress





Outlook: What to Watch





Positive Catalysts



  • Return to sustained operational profitability (positive operating margin)

  • Reduction in other income dependency below 50% of PBT

  • Revenue stabilisation with consistent QoQ growth

  • ROE improvement above 10% threshold

  • Entry of institutional investors signalling confidence




Red Flags to Monitor



  • Further deterioration in operating margins beyond negative 30%

  • Continued revenue volatility and sequential declines

  • Other income exceeding 200% of PBT for multiple quarters

  • Breach of ₹5.45 support level (52-week low)

  • Any promoter stake reduction or pledging

  • Inability to deploy raised capital productively






The Verdict: A Deteriorating Micro-Cap with No Clear Path to Recovery


STRONG SELL

Score: 16/100


For Fresh Investors: Avoid entirely. Odyssey Corporation exhibits all the hallmarks of a value trap—cheap valuation masking fundamental operational failure, unsustainable earnings quality driven by other income, and zero institutional validation. The 73.91% one-year decline reflects justified market scepticism about the company's ability to generate sustainable profits from its core NBFC operations.


For Existing Holders: Exit at current levels or on any technical bounce towards ₹7.15-7.30 resistance. The company's negative operating margins, anaemic ROE of 2.55%, and persistent reliance on non-core income sources indicate structural business model challenges that are unlikely to resolve in the near term. With bearish technical trends and no institutional support, further downside risk remains elevated.


Fair Value Estimate: ₹4.50-5.00 (34% downside from current levels), based on 0.20-0.23x price-to-book ratio reflecting weak ROE and negative ROCE. Even this assumes operational stabilisation, which appears unlikely given current trajectory.





Note: ROCE = (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)





⚠️ Investment Disclaimer


This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and investing in micro-cap stocks carries substantial risk of capital loss.





{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News