Onix Solar Energy Q2 FY26: Explosive Revenue Growth Masks Profitability Concerns

Dec 01 2025 12:46 PM IST
share
Share Via
Onix Solar Energy Ltd., a micro-cap non-ferrous metals trading company with a market capitalisation of ₹565.12 crores, delivered extraordinary revenue expansion in Q2 FY26, though the euphoria was tempered by deteriorating profitability metrics and a sharp stock price correction. The company reported net profit of ₹1.01 crores for the quarter ended June 2025, representing a sequential increase of 57.81% from Q1 FY26's ₹0.64 crores, whilst year-on-year comparisons reveal staggering growth of 2,425.00% from the ₹0.04 crores posted in Q2 FY25.





Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

₹1.01 Cr

▲ 57.81% QoQ



Revenue Growth (YoY)

17,284.62%

Explosive Expansion



PAT Margin

2.23%

▼ From 2.75% QoQ



Return on Equity (Latest)

44.83%

Strong Capital Efficiency




The stock, trading at ₹275.75 as of December 01, 2025, has experienced significant volatility in recent months, declining 5.00% on the day and posting a concerning 19.57% drop over the past month. Despite the short-term turbulence, longer-term investors have been rewarded handsomely, with the stock delivering a remarkable 410.65% return over two years and an astounding 4,175.19% gain over five years, vastly outperforming the Sensex by 4,083.38 percentage points over the same period.



The company's transformation from a dormant entity to an active trading operation has been nothing short of dramatic. Formerly known as Brassco Extrusions Limited and incorporated in 1980, Onix Solar Energy transitioned from manufacturing brass rods, tubes, and copper pipes to trading in non-ferrous metals. This strategic pivot has generated explosive revenue growth, though questions remain about the sustainability and quality of these earnings.



Financial Performance: Revenue Surge Amid Margin Compression



Onix Solar Energy's Q2 FY26 financial performance presents a study in contrasts. Net sales reached ₹45.20 crores, representing a sequential increase of 94.24% from Q1 FY26's ₹23.27 crores and an extraordinary year-on-year surge of 17,284.62% from the negligible ₹0.26 crores recorded in Q2 FY25. This explosive revenue expansion reflects the company's aggressive push into non-ferrous metals trading, leveraging its strategically located warehouse facility on the outskirts of Mumbai.

































































Metric Q2 FY26 Q1 FY26 Q4 FY25 Q3 FY25 Q2 FY25
Net Sales (₹ Cr) 45.20 23.27 5.73 0.13 0.26
QoQ Growth +94.24% +306.11% +4,307.69% -50.00%
Net Profit (₹ Cr) 1.01 0.64 0.63 0.15 0.04
QoQ Growth +57.81% +1.59% +320.00% +275.00%
Operating Margin (Excl OI) 2.74% 2.58% 9.08% 38.46% -23.08%
PAT Margin 2.23% 2.75% 10.99% 115.38% 15.38%



However, the margin profile tells a more sobering story. Operating profit margin (excluding other income) stood at 2.74% in Q2 FY26, marginally improved from Q1 FY26's 2.58% but dramatically lower than the 9.08% achieved in Q4 FY25. The PAT margin of 2.23% represents a sequential decline from 2.75% in the previous quarter, suggesting that the rapid revenue scaling has come at the expense of profitability. The company's operating profit (PBDIT excluding other income) reached ₹1.24 crores, whilst net profit of ₹1.01 crores was supported by other income of ₹0.11 crores and a favourable tax rate of 25.19%.



The quarterly trend reveals concerning volatility in margin performance. Whilst Q3 FY25 and Q4 FY25 delivered exceptional margins (115.38% and 10.99% PAT margins respectively), these appear to be anomalies rather than sustainable benchmarks. The compression to 2.23% in Q2 FY26 suggests that as the business scales, competitive pressures in the non-ferrous metals trading sector are constraining pricing power and profitability.





Net Sales (Q2 FY26)

₹45.20 Cr

▲ 94.24% QoQ



Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

₹1.01 Cr

▲ 57.81% QoQ



Operating Margin

2.74%

▲ From 2.58% QoQ



PAT Margin

2.23%

▼ From 2.75% QoQ




Operational Challenges: Weak Returns and Quality Concerns



Beneath the impressive revenue growth figures lies a more troubling operational reality. Onix Solar Energy's average return on capital employed (ROCE) stands at a deeply negative -18.97%, whilst the five-year average return on equity (ROE) of 5.39% falls well below acceptable thresholds for value creation. These metrics paint a picture of a business that has historically struggled to generate adequate returns on invested capital, raising questions about the fundamental economics of the trading model.



The latest ROE figure of 44.83% represents a significant improvement and suggests the recent operational pivot may be bearing fruit. However, this single-quarter metric must be viewed with caution given the historical track record and the volatility evident in quarterly results. The company's balance sheet reveals shareholder funds of ₹5.42 crores as of March 2025, up from ₹3.96 crores in the previous year, supported by reserves and surplus of ₹3.44 crores.




Critical Concern: Return on Capital Efficiency


The company's five-year average ROCE of -18.97% indicates chronic value destruction, with capital deployed failing to generate adequate returns. Whilst the latest quarterly ROE of 44.83% shows improvement, the sustainability of this turnaround remains unproven. The average sales to capital employed ratio of 0.79x suggests inefficient asset utilisation, a significant red flag for a trading-focused business model.




The company operates with minimal debt, maintaining a net cash position with an average net debt to equity ratio of -0.30. Whilst this conservative financial structure provides flexibility, it also raises questions about whether the business model can support leverage-driven growth. Current assets of ₹39.35 crores as of March 2025 substantially exceed current liabilities of ₹33.96 crores, though the sharp increase in other current liabilities to ₹32.70 crores from just ₹0.01 crores warrants close monitoring.



The Valuation Conundrum: Extreme Premium Without Justification



Onix Solar Energy trades at valuation multiples that can only be described as stratospheric. The price-to-earnings ratio of 248.37x places the stock at a massive premium to the non-ferrous metals industry average of 19x. The price-to-book value ratio of 111.36x is equally eye-watering, suggesting the market is pricing in extraordinary future growth that may prove difficult to deliver.




Valuation Reality Check


At 248x trailing earnings and 111x book value, Onix Solar Energy trades at multiples typically reserved for high-growth technology companies with proven business models and strong competitive moats. For a trading company in the commoditised non-ferrous metals sector, these valuations appear disconnected from fundamental reality. The EV/EBITDA multiple of 249.75x and EV/Sales ratio of 8.10x further underscore the extreme premium being demanded by the market.








































Valuation Metric Onix Solar Industry Avg Premium/(Discount)
P/E Ratio (TTM) 248.37x 19.00x +1,207%
Price to Book Value 111.36x ~3.20x +3,380%
EV/EBITDA 249.75x
EV/Sales 8.10x



The proprietary valuation assessment categorises the stock as "VERY EXPENSIVE," a grade it has held since mid-October 2025. The PEG ratio of 1.90x suggests that even accounting for the impressive five-year sales growth rate of 90.90%, the current valuation appears stretched. With the stock trading 46.99% below its 52-week high of ₹520.20 but still 147.98% above its 52-week low of ₹111.20, investors face significant two-way risk.



Peer Comparison: Valuation Outlier in Non-Ferrous Metals



When benchmarked against industry peers, Onix Solar Energy's valuation premium becomes even more stark. The company's P/E ratio of 248.37x dwarfs competitors such as Euro Panel Products (23.15x), Maan Aluminium (55.81x), and Bhagyanagar India (15.85x). Similarly, the price-to-book ratio of 111.36x stands in sharp contrast to Maan Aluminium's 4.62x, Euro Panel's 2.93x, and Bhagyanagar's 1.92x.



















































Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE (%) Debt/Equity
Onix Solar 248.37x 111.36x 5.39% -0.30
Maan Aluminium 55.81x 4.62x 22.42% 0.40
Euro Panel 23.15x 2.93x 23.30% 0.84
Bhagyanagar Ind 15.85x 1.92x 10.63% 1.61
Owais Metal 12.16x



More concerning is the quality comparison. Whilst Onix Solar's five-year average ROE of 5.39% lags substantially behind Maan Aluminium's 22.42% and Euro Panel's 23.30%, investors are being asked to pay a far higher premium. This disconnect between valuation and fundamental quality metrics represents a significant risk factor. The company ranks third by market capitalisation among its peer group at ₹565.12 crores, yet commands the highest valuation multiples despite demonstrably weaker return profiles.



Shareholding Pattern: Absence of Institutional Validation



One of the most striking aspects of Onix Solar Energy's equity structure is the complete absence of institutional participation. As of September 2025, the company records zero holdings from foreign institutional investors (FIIs), mutual funds, insurance companies, and other domestic institutional investors (DIIs). The entire shareholding of 100.00% resides with non-institutional investors, a pattern that has remained unchanged over the past five quarters.

























































Category Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 Dec'24 Jun'24
Promoter 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
FII 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Mutual Funds 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Insurance 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Non-Institutional 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%



The absence of promoter holding and institutional participation raises significant governance and liquidity concerns. Professional investors typically conduct rigorous due diligence before committing capital, and their complete absence from the shareholding structure suggests potential red flags that warrant careful consideration. The lack of institutional validation, combined with the extreme valuation multiples, creates a precarious situation where the stock price is entirely dependent on retail investor sentiment rather than fundamental conviction from sophisticated market participants.



Stock Performance: Spectacular Long-Term Gains Meet Near-Term Reality



Onix Solar Energy's stock performance presents a tale of two timelines. Over extended periods, the returns have been nothing short of extraordinary. The five-year return of 4,175.19% translates to a compound annual growth rate exceeding 100%, vastly outperforming the Sensex's 91.81% gain over the same period. The three-year return of 340.85% and two-year return of 410.65% similarly demonstrate exceptional wealth creation for early investors.





































































Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Day -5.00% -0.06% -4.94%
1 Week -2.46% 0.89% -3.35%
1 Month -19.57% 2.04% -21.61%
3 Month -19.83% 6.58% -26.41%
6 Month +7.55% 5.16% +2.39%
YTD +19.55% 9.62% +9.93%
2 Years +410.65% 26.93% +383.72%
3 Years +340.85% 35.35% +305.50%
5 Years +4,175.19% 91.81% +4,083.38%



However, recent performance tells a different story. The stock has declined 19.57% over the past month and 19.83% over three months, underperforming the Sensex by 21.61 and 26.41 percentage points respectively. The one-day decline of 5.00% reflects growing investor concerns about valuation sustainability and operational execution. Technical indicators paint a bearish picture, with the stock trading below all key moving averages—the 5-day MA of ₹285.81, 20-day MA of ₹303.91, 50-day MA of ₹306.08, 100-day MA of ₹355.93, and 200-day MA of ₹328.63.



The technical trend shifted to "BEARISH" on November 17, 2025, at ₹300.65, following a brief period of mildly bearish sentiment. Weekly MACD, RSI, Bollinger Bands, and KST indicators all flash bearish signals, suggesting the path of least resistance remains downward in the near term. The stock's journey from its 52-week high of ₹520.20 to the current price of ₹275.75 represents a decline of 46.99%, illustrating the severe correction underway.




"The disconnect between stratospheric valuations and fundamental quality metrics represents the central investment dilemma facing Onix Solar Energy shareholders."


Investment Thesis: Quality Concerns Overshadow Growth Narrative



The proprietary Mojo Score of 22 out of 100 places Onix Solar Energy firmly in "STRONG SELL" territory, reflecting the confluence of negative factors weighing on the investment case. The overall quality grade of "BELOW AVERAGE" underscores the fundamental challenges facing the business model. Whilst the financial trend has been classified as "POSITIVE" based on recent quarterly improvements, the technical trend remains decidedly "BEARISH," creating a misalignment between fundamental momentum and market sentiment.



The valuation grade of "VERY EXPENSIVE" represents perhaps the most significant headwind. At 248x trailing earnings and 111x book value, the stock prices in perfection—a dangerous proposition for a company with an inconsistent track record and operating in a commoditised trading sector. The average ROCE of -18.97% over five years indicates chronic capital inefficiency, whilst the latest quarterly ROE of 44.83%, though improved, requires multiple quarters of consistent delivery before it can be considered sustainable.



Key Strengths & Risk Factors





✓ KEY STRENGTHS



  • Explosive Revenue Growth: Net sales surged 17,284.62% YoY in Q2 FY26, demonstrating successful business model transformation

  • Zero Debt Position: Net cash balance sheet with debt-to-equity of -0.30 provides financial flexibility

  • Improved ROE: Latest quarterly ROE of 44.83% shows strong improvement in capital efficiency

  • Strategic Location: Warehouse facility near Mumbai provides logistical advantages for metals trading

  • No Promoter Pledging: Zero pledged shares eliminates one governance risk factor

  • Spectacular Long-Term Returns: Five-year return of 4,175.19% has created substantial shareholder wealth




⚠ KEY CONCERNS



  • Extreme Valuation: P/E of 248x and P/BV of 111x represent unjustifiable premiums for a trading company

  • Weak Historical Returns: Five-year average ROCE of -18.97% indicates chronic value destruction

  • Margin Compression: PAT margin declined to 2.23% from 10.99% in Q4 FY25, questioning scalability

  • Zero Institutional Holdings: Complete absence of FII, MF, and DII participation raises red flags

  • Technical Breakdown: Stock down 46.99% from 52-week high with bearish trend across all indicators

  • Inconsistent Profitability: Volatile quarterly results with no established pattern of sustainable earnings

  • Quality Grade: "Below Average" classification reflects weak long-term financial performance





Outlook: What Lies Ahead





POSITIVE CATALYSTS



  • Sustained revenue growth above ₹40 crores per quarter

  • Margin stabilisation above 5% PAT margin for three consecutive quarters

  • Entry of institutional investors (FII/MF) providing validation

  • ROCE improvement to positive territory on a sustained basis

  • Valuation correction to below 100x P/E creating better entry points




RED FLAGS TO MONITOR



  • Further margin compression below 2% PAT margin

  • Revenue decline or stagnation in upcoming quarters

  • Continued absence of institutional investor participation

  • Technical breakdown below ₹250 support level

  • Any increase in debt levels or deterioration in working capital





The forward outlook for Onix Solar Energy hinges critically on the company's ability to demonstrate that recent revenue growth represents a sustainable transformation rather than a temporary spike. The trading business model in non-ferrous metals operates in a highly competitive, low-margin environment where scale advantages are difficult to establish. For the current valuation to be justified, the company would need to deliver not just continued revenue growth but significant margin expansion—a challenging proposition given the structural characteristics of the industry.



The technical picture suggests further downside risk in the near term, with immediate support at the ₹275 level already breached. The next major support lies at the 52-week low of ₹111.20, representing potential downside of 59.67% from current levels. Resistance is firmly established at the 20-day moving average of ₹303.91, with more significant barriers at the 100-day and 200-day moving averages.




The Verdict: Valuation Excess Overwhelms Growth Story


STRONG SELL

Score: 22/100


For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiation at current levels. The extreme valuation multiples of 248x P/E and 111x P/BV, combined with weak historical return metrics and complete absence of institutional validation, create an unfavourable risk-reward profile. Whilst the revenue growth story is compelling, the quality concerns and valuation excess far outweigh the potential upside. Consider waiting for substantial correction below ₹200 and evidence of sustained margin improvement before contemplating entry.


For Existing Holders: Book profits and exit positions. The 46.99% decline from 52-week highs represents a significant correction, but further downside remains likely given the valuation disconnect and deteriorating technical picture. Existing holders who have benefited from the spectacular multi-year rally should recognise that the easy gains have been made. The risk of further mean reversion to more reasonable valuation levels outweighs the probability of a sustained recovery from current levels.


Fair Value Estimate: ₹150-180 (45.45% to 34.70% downside from current price of ₹275.75), based on normalised earnings power and peer group valuation multiples in the 15-20x P/E range.





Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)





⚠️ Investment Disclaimer


This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and all investments carry risk of loss.





{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News