Ontic Finserve Q3 FY26: Revenue Collapse Signals Operational Crisis

Feb 05 2026 05:48 PM IST
share
Share Via
Ontic Finserve Ltd. reported alarming results for Q3 FY26 (October-December 2025), with net sales plunging to zero from ₹0.40 crores in Q2 FY26, marking a complete operational halt. The micro-cap NBFC, with a market capitalisation of just ₹12.00 crores, posted a nominal net profit of ₹0.01 crores during the quarter, down sharply from ₹0.31 crores in the preceding quarter. The stock, currently trading at ₹1.23, has declined 58.02% over the past three months, reflecting severe investor concerns about the company's business viability.
Ontic Finserve Q3 FY26: Revenue Collapse Signals Operational Crisis
Net Profit (Q3 FY26)
₹0.01 Cr
▼ 96.77% QoQ
Net Sales (Q3 FY26)
₹0.00 Cr
▼ 100.00% QoQ
ROE (Latest)
28.95%
Strong Capital Efficiency
P/E Ratio (TTM)
10.06x
Below Industry (23x)

The complete absence of revenue in Q3 FY26 represents a dramatic deterioration from the company's performance in the first half of the fiscal year, when it generated ₹0.96 crores in net sales across Q1 and Q2. This operational shutdown raises fundamental questions about the company's business model, client relationships, and ability to generate sustainable cash flows. Despite this revenue collapse, the company managed to post a marginal profit of ₹0.01 crores, primarily supported by other income of ₹0.07 crores during the quarter.

Formerly known as Maral Finance Limited and incorporated in May 1995, Ontic Finserve operates in the financial advisory business segment. The company's equity capital stands at ₹9.00 crores with a negative reserve of ₹7.20 crores as of March 2024, resulting in shareholder funds of just ₹1.80 crores. With zero promoter holding and minimal institutional interest at 6.96%, the company lacks the backing typically associated with credible financial services firms.

Quarter Net Sales (₹ Cr) QoQ Change Net Profit (₹ Cr) QoQ Change PAT Margin
Dec'25 (Q3) 0.00 ▼ 100.00% 0.01 ▼ 96.77% 0.0%
Sep'25 (Q2) 0.40 ▼ 28.57% 0.31 ▼ 22.50% 77.5%
Jun'25 (Q1) 0.56 N/A 0.40 ▲ 700.00% 71.43%
Mar'25 (Q4) 0.00 ▼ 100.00% 0.05 ▼ 85.29% 0.0%
Dec'24 (Q3) 0.50 ▼ 64.29% 0.34 ▼ 67.31% 68.0%
Sep'24 (Q2) 1.40 N/A 1.04 ▲ 966.67% 74.29%
Jun'24 (Q1) 0.00 N/A -0.12 N/A 0.0%

Financial Performance: Complete Revenue Breakdown

The third quarter of FY26 witnessed an unprecedented revenue collapse, with net sales falling to zero from ₹0.40 crores in Q2 FY26, representing a 100.00% quarter-on-quarter decline. This marks the second instance in the past four quarters where the company has reported zero revenue, following a similar occurrence in Q4 FY25. On a year-on-year basis, the comparison is equally concerning, as Q3 FY25 had recorded net sales of ₹0.50 crores, making the current quarter's performance a 100.00% decline.

Operating profit before depreciation, interest, and tax (excluding other income) plunged to a loss of ₹0.06 crores in Q3 FY26, the worst quarterly performance in recent history. This compares unfavourably to an operating profit of ₹0.35 crores in Q2 FY26 and ₹0.44 crores in Q3 FY25. The company's reliance on other income became starkly evident, as ₹0.07 crores in other income during the quarter prevented a deeper loss. Without this non-operating income, the company would have reported a pre-tax loss.

Net Sales (Q3 FY26)
₹0.00 Cr
▼ 100.00% YoY
Net Profit (Q3 FY26)
₹0.01 Cr
▼ 97.06% YoY
Operating Profit Margin
0.0%
Vs 88.0% in Q3 FY25
PAT Margin
0.0%
Vs 68.0% in Q3 FY25

Net profit for Q3 FY26 stood at a meagre ₹0.01 crores, down 96.77% from ₹0.31 crores in Q2 FY26 and 97.06% from ₹0.34 crores in Q3 FY25. The effective tax rate was negligible at 0.00%, suggesting the company may be utilising carried-forward losses or has minimal taxable income. Employee costs remained stable at ₹0.01 crores, indicating a skeleton staff structure. The company's profit before tax of ₹0.01 crores in Q3 FY26 compares poorly to ₹0.41 crores in Q2 FY26 and ₹0.46 crores in Q3 FY25.

Critical Alert: Business Continuity Risk

Zero Revenue Generation: The complete absence of net sales in Q3 FY26 raises serious questions about the company's operational viability. This is the second revenue-less quarter in the past four reporting periods, indicating a pattern of business disruption rather than an isolated incident. Investors should exercise extreme caution.

Balance Sheet Concerns: Eroding Capital Base

Ontic Finserve's balance sheet as of March 2024 reveals a precarious financial position. Share capital stands at ₹9.00 crores, but reserves and surplus are deeply negative at ₹7.20 crores, resulting in net shareholder funds of just ₹1.80 crores. This represents a significant deterioration from ₹4.55 crores in shareholder funds as of March 2023, indicating substantial capital erosion over the past year. The negative reserves have widened from ₹4.45 crores to ₹7.20 crores, reflecting accumulated losses.

On the asset side, fixed assets are virtually non-existent at near-zero levels as of March 2024, down from ₹0.01 crores in the previous year. Current assets have collapsed to ₹0.05 crores from ₹0.31 crores in March 2023, a decline of 83.87%. The company maintains no long-term debt, which is a positive from a leverage perspective, but current liabilities of ₹0.09 crores, though modest, represent a significant proportion relative to the diminished asset base. The debt-to-equity ratio of 0.09 is low, but this metric offers little comfort given the company's inability to generate consistent revenue.

Return on equity for the latest period stands at 28.95%, which appears attractive on the surface. However, this metric must be interpreted cautiously given the extremely small equity base of ₹1.80 crores and the erratic profit generation. The average ROE over five years is 8.84%, reflecting the company's historical struggles. ROCE (return on capital employed) for the latest period is reported at 31.05%, but again, the sustainability of these returns is highly questionable given the current operational challenges.

Capital Efficiency Paradox

Despite reporting impressive ROE and ROCE figures of 28.95% and 31.05% respectively, these metrics are misleading in Ontic Finserve's context. The high returns are calculated on an extremely small and shrinking capital base, and the company's inability to generate consistent revenue undermines any confidence in the sustainability of these returns. Higher ROE typically signals better capital efficiency, but in this case, it reflects a distorted picture due to the company's financial fragility.

Shareholding Pattern: Absence of Promoter Confidence

The shareholding pattern of Ontic Finserve reveals a troubling lack of promoter involvement and institutional interest. As of December 2025, promoter holding stands at 0.00%, unchanged across all recent quarters. This complete absence of promoter stake is highly unusual for an Indian company and raises fundamental questions about ownership structure and management accountability. The lack of skin in the game from promoters is a significant red flag for potential investors.

Shareholder Category Dec'25 Sep'25 Jun'25 Mar'25 QoQ Change
Promoter Holding 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
FII Holding 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Mutual Fund Holding 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Insurance Holdings 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Other DII Holdings 6.96% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% ▲ 6.96%
Non-Institutional 93.04% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% ▼ 6.96%

Foreign institutional investors (FIIs), mutual funds, and insurance companies have zero exposure to the stock across all recent quarters. The only notable development is the entry of other domestic institutional investors (DIIs) with a 6.96% stake in Q3 FY26, up from 0.00% in the previous quarter. This represents a marginal increase in institutional interest, but the overall institutional holding of just 6.96% remains extremely low and insufficient to provide credibility or stability to the stock. Non-institutional investors, primarily retail shareholders, hold 93.04% of the equity, indicating a highly fragmented and potentially volatile shareholder base.

Peer Comparison: Underperformance Across Metrics

Comparing Ontic Finserve with its NBFC peers reveals a mixed picture. The company's P/E ratio of 10.06x is significantly lower than the industry average of 23x, suggesting the stock trades at a substantial discount. However, this valuation gap likely reflects the market's scepticism about the company's business sustainability rather than representing an attractive entry point. The price-to-book value of 2.91x is higher than most peers, indicating the market assigns some premium despite operational challenges.

Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE (%) Debt/Equity Div Yield
Ontic Finserve 10.06 2.91 8.84% 0.09 NA
Svaraj Trading NA (Loss Making) 0.20 0.0% 0.00 NA
Shrydus Industries 1.50 0.25 12.54% 0.00 NA
Inditrade Capital NA (Loss Making) 0.14 1.94% 2.44 NA
FGP 50.53 2.89 4.26% -1.03 NA
Rajputana Investment 46.90 2.54 5.28% 0.00 NA

Ontic Finserve's average ROE of 8.84% ranks in the middle of the peer group, higher than Svaraj Trading (0.0%), Inditrade Capital (1.94%), FGP (4.26%), and Rajputana Investment (5.28%), but lower than Shrydus Industries (12.54%). However, the sustainability of this ROE is questionable given the current revenue challenges. The company's debt-to-equity ratio of 0.09 is among the lowest in the peer group, indicating conservative leverage, though this offers limited comfort given the operational issues. With a market capitalisation of ₹12.00 crores, Ontic Finserve ranks second in its peer group, but this positioning reflects its micro-cap status rather than operational strength.

Valuation Analysis: Discount Reflects Distress

At the current market price of ₹1.23, Ontic Finserve trades at a P/E ratio of 10.06x, representing a significant 56.26% discount to the NBFC industry average of 23x. Whilst this valuation gap might appear attractive on the surface, it is more accurately interpreted as a distress discount reflecting the market's severe concerns about business viability. The company's valuation grade has been consistently classified as "Very Expensive" by proprietary assessments, with frequent oscillations between "Expensive" and "Very Expensive" throughout 2025, suggesting high volatility and uncertainty.

The price-to-book value of 2.91x appears elevated given the shrinking shareholder base and negative reserves. With book value per share at ₹2.00 and the current market price at ₹1.23, the stock actually trades at a 38.50% discount to book value, contrary to the P/BV multiple of 2.91x reported. This discrepancy warrants careful examination of the calculation methodology. The EV-to-EBITDA multiple of 8.95x and EV-to-sales ratio of 7.78x are difficult to interpret given the zero revenue in the latest quarter.

P/E Ratio (TTM)
10.06x
56% below industry
P/BV Ratio
2.91x
Premium to peers
Dividend Yield
NA
No dividends
Mojo Score
44/100
SELL Rating

The stock has declined 59.41% from its 52-week high of ₹3.03, though it remains 136.54% above its 52-week low of ₹0.52. This wide trading range reflects extreme volatility and uncertainty. The PEG ratio of 0.06 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to growth expectations, but this metric is unreliable given the negative sales growth of 20.37% over five years. No dividend yield is available as the company does not pay dividends, which is unsurprising given the capital erosion and operational challenges.

Stock Performance: Severe Underperformance Across Timeframes

Ontic Finserve's stock performance has been marked by extreme volatility and significant underperformance relative to broader market indices. Over the past three months, the stock has plunged 58.02%, whilst the Sensex declined just 0.17%, resulting in a massive negative alpha of 57.85 percentage points. This severe underperformance coincides with the deteriorating operational performance and revenue collapse in recent quarters.

Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Day -0.81% -0.60% -0.21%
1 Week +6.03% +0.91% +5.12%
1 Month -30.51% -2.49% -28.02%
3 Months -58.02% -0.17% -57.85%
6 Months +83.58% +3.23% +80.35%
YTD -26.35% -2.24% -24.11%
1 Year +92.19% +6.44% +85.75%
2 Years +66.22% +16.15% +50.07%
3 Years -18.54% +36.94% -55.48%
5 Years +158.95% +64.22% +94.73%

Over one year, the stock has delivered exceptional returns of 92.19%, vastly outperforming the Sensex's 6.44% gain and generating a positive alpha of 85.75 percentage points. However, this strong annual performance is misleading, as it reflects a recovery from extremely depressed levels rather than sustainable business improvement. The stock's beta of 1.50 indicates it is 50% more volatile than the broader market, classified as a high-beta stock with corresponding high risk.

Technical indicators present a mixed picture. The overall technical trend is classified as "Mildly Bullish" as of December 15, 2025, though the trend changed from "Bullish" at ₹2.00. The stock trades below all major moving averages—5-day (₹1.19), 20-day (₹1.44), 50-day (₹1.78), 100-day (₹1.87), and 200-day (₹1.30)—indicating weak momentum. The risk-adjusted return over one year stands at 1.29 with volatility of 71.49%, categorising the stock as "High Risk High Return." The Sharpe ratio is positive but the extreme volatility undermines the attractiveness of returns.

"With zero revenue generation in Q3 FY26, absent promoter holding, and a shrinking capital base, Ontic Finserve faces an existential business crisis that far outweighs any apparent valuation discount."

Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags Outweigh Valuation Discount

The investment thesis for Ontic Finserve is fundamentally challenged by multiple structural weaknesses that override any perceived valuation attractiveness. The company's proprietary Mojo Score stands at 44 out of 100, placing it firmly in "SELL" territory. This assessment reflects a comprehensive evaluation across four key parameters: valuation (Very Attractive), quality (Below Average), financial trend (Flat), and technical trend (Mildly Bullish).

Whilst the valuation appears attractive with a P/E of 10.06x trading at a significant discount to the industry average, this discount is a distress signal rather than an opportunity. The quality assessment of "Below Average" is based on weak five-year sales growth of -20.37%, average ROE of just 8.84%, and minimal institutional holdings of 6.96%. The financial trend is classified as "Flat" for Q3 FY26, though this understates the severity of the revenue collapse. The technical trend of "Mildly Bullish" provides little comfort given the stock's position below all major moving averages.

Key Strengths

  • Low Leverage: Debt-to-equity ratio of 0.09 indicates minimal financial risk from borrowings
  • Valuation Discount: P/E of 10.06x represents 56% discount to NBFC industry average of 23x
  • Strong One-Year Returns: Stock delivered 92.19% returns over past year, outperforming Sensex by 85.75 percentage points
  • Capital Efficiency Metrics: Latest ROE of 28.95% and ROCE of 31.05% appear attractive on surface
  • Institutional Entry: Modest DII stake of 6.96% acquired in Q3 FY26 shows some institutional interest

Key Concerns

  • Zero Revenue: Complete absence of net sales in Q3 FY26 raises existential business viability questions
  • No Promoter Holding: 0% promoter stake indicates lack of management skin in the game and accountability
  • Capital Erosion: Negative reserves of ₹7.20 crores with shareholder funds declining to ₹1.80 crores
  • Inconsistent Operations: Two quarters of zero revenue in past four reporting periods shows pattern of disruption
  • Minimal Institutional Interest: Only 6.96% institutional holding with no FII, MF, or insurance participation
  • Weak Quality Grade: Below Average classification based on negative sales growth and weak historical ROE
  • High Volatility: Beta of 1.50 and volatility of 71.49% indicate extreme price risk

Outlook: Critical Monitoring Points

The outlook for Ontic Finserve hinges entirely on the company's ability to restore revenue generation and demonstrate business viability in the coming quarters. Investors should closely monitor whether Q4 FY26 results show any signs of operational recovery or if the revenue drought continues. The company's ability to maintain even marginal profitability depends heavily on other income, which is not a sustainable business model for an NBFC.

Positive Catalysts

  • Revenue restoration in Q4 FY26 with clear explanation of Q3 disruption
  • Entry of strategic promoter or institutional investor with significant stake
  • Announcement of new business initiatives or client acquisitions
  • Stabilisation of shareholder funds and halt to reserve erosion
  • Improved disclosure and transparency around business operations

Red Flags to Watch

  • Continued revenue absence or minimal revenue generation in Q4 FY26
  • Further decline in shareholder funds below ₹1.50 crores
  • Exit of the 6.96% DII stake acquired in Q3 FY26
  • Any regulatory actions or compliance issues
  • Inability to explain business model or revenue generation strategy

The stock's technical position below all major moving averages and the "Mildly Bullish" trend classification suggest limited near-term upside momentum. The immediate resistance at ₹1.44 (20-day moving average) and major resistance at ₹1.87 (100-day moving average) represent significant hurdles. Conversely, the 52-week low of ₹0.52 provides downside support, though further operational deterioration could test these levels.

The Verdict: Avoid Until Business Viability Demonstrated

STRONG SELL

Score: 44/100

For Fresh Investors: Avoid completely. The zero revenue generation in Q3 FY26, absent promoter holding, and shrinking capital base present unacceptable risks that far outweigh any valuation discount. Wait for at least two consecutive quarters of sustained revenue generation and clear business visibility before considering any position.

For Existing Holders: Consider exiting on any price rallies towards ₹1.44-₹1.50 levels. The fundamental deterioration in business operations and lack of promoter confidence make this a high-risk hold. If Q4 FY26 results show continued revenue absence, immediate exit is advisable regardless of price.

Fair Value Estimate: ₹0.80 (35% downside from current price of ₹1.23). This estimate factors in the distressed business condition, minimal asset base, and absence of sustainable revenue generation. Any valuation premium requires demonstrated operational recovery.

Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)

⚠️ Investment Disclaimer

This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. The extreme volatility and operational challenges facing Ontic Finserve make this a highly speculative investment unsuitable for most investors. Past performance, including the strong one-year returns, is not indicative of future results, particularly given the current business disruption.

{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News