Par Drugs & Chemicals Q3 FY26: Strong Profit Surge Masks Troubling Long-Term Trajectory

13 hours ago
share
Share Via
Par Drugs and Chemicals Ltd., a micro-cap chemical manufacturer with a market capitalisation of ₹124.83 crores, delivered a robust quarterly performance in Q3 FY26, posting net profit of ₹4.80 crores—a sharp 16.23% quarter-on-quarter increase and a remarkable 727.59% year-on-year surge. However, this impressive quarterly snapshot conceals deeper structural concerns that have plagued the company's long-term trajectory, with the stock down 41.57% over the past year despite the recent operational uptick.
Par Drugs & Chemicals Q3 FY26: Strong Profit Surge Masks Troubling Long-Term Trajectory
Net Profit (Q3 FY26)
₹4.80 Cr
▲ 16.23% QoQ | ▲ 727.59% YoY
Revenue (Q3 FY26)
₹29.34 Cr
▲ 2.37% QoQ | ▲ 37.23% YoY
Operating Margin
20.65%
▼ 53 bps QoQ | ▲ 1401 bps YoY
Return on Equity
15.44%
Average ROE

The Bhavnagar-based chemical manufacturer, founded in 1982 under the vision of Late Shri Vallabhbhai J. Savani, has demonstrated operational resilience in the latest quarter with net sales reaching a quarterly high of ₹29.34 crores. The PAT margin expanded to 16.36% in Q3 FY26 from 14.41% in Q2 FY26, reflecting improved profitability. Yet, the company's five-year EBIT growth trajectory tells a starkly different story, declining at an annual rate of 7.45%, raising fundamental questions about sustainable competitive positioning in the chemicals sector.

Financial Performance: Sequential Momentum Meets Year-on-Year Volatility

Par Drugs & Chemicals' Q3 FY26 results showcase a company finding its operational footing after a turbulent period. Net sales of ₹29.34 crores represent the highest quarterly revenue on record, marking a modest 2.37% sequential increase from Q2 FY26's ₹28.66 crores. The year-on-year comparison reveals more dramatic improvement, with revenue surging 37.23% from the depressed base of ₹21.38 crores in Q3 FY25.

Quarter Net Sales (₹ Cr) QoQ Change Net Profit (₹ Cr) QoQ Change PAT Margin
Dec'25 (Q3) 29.34 +2.37% 4.80 +16.23% 16.36%
Sep'25 (Q2) 28.66 +10.02% 4.13 +24.02% 14.41%
Jun'25 (Q1) 26.05 +16.66% 3.33 +101.82% 12.78%
Mar'25 (Q4) 22.33 +4.44% 1.65 +184.48% 7.39%
Dec'24 (Q3) 21.38 -38.32% 0.58 -93.26% 2.71%
Sep'24 (Q2) 34.66 +53.30% 8.60 +239.92% 24.81%
Jun'24 (Q1) 22.61 2.53 11.19%

The quarterly trend table reveals significant volatility in Par Drugs' operational performance. The company's revenue trajectory has been anything but linear, with Q2 FY25 showing an exceptional ₹34.66 crores in sales followed by a dramatic 38.32% sequential decline to ₹21.38 crores in Q3 FY25. This pattern suggests either lumpy order execution or seasonal demand fluctuations that create unpredictability in financial forecasting.

Operating margins excluding other income stood at 20.65% in Q3 FY26, down marginally from 21.18% in Q2 FY26 but substantially higher than the 6.64% recorded in Q3 FY25. This year-on-year margin expansion of 1,401 basis points reflects improved operational efficiency and better cost management. However, the comparison with Q2 FY25's extraordinary 32.92% operating margin highlights the episodic nature of the company's profitability profile.

Net Sales (Q3 FY26)
₹29.34 Cr
▲ 2.37% QoQ | ▲ 37.23% YoY
Net Profit (Q3 FY26)
₹4.80 Cr
▲ 16.23% QoQ | ▲ 727.59% YoY
Operating Margin (Excl OI)
20.65%
▼ 53 bps QoQ | ▲ 1401 bps YoY
PAT Margin
16.36%
▲ 195 bps QoQ | ▲ 1365 bps YoY

The quality of earnings in Q3 FY26 appears reasonably solid, with other income contributing ₹1.33 crores to the overall operating profit of ₹7.39 crores—representing 18.00% of operating profit. This proportion, whilst notable, is not excessively high and suggests that core business operations remain the primary driver of profitability. The tax rate of 25.47% aligns closely with statutory rates, indicating no unusual tax adjustments that might distort reported earnings.

Capital Efficiency: Strong ROCE Masks Declining Growth Trajectory

Par Drugs & Chemicals demonstrates impressive capital efficiency metrics that stand in stark contrast to its growth challenges. The company's average return on capital employed (ROCE) of 30.53% positions it among the more efficient operators in the chemicals sector, reflecting management's ability to generate substantial returns from deployed capital. The latest ROCE of 22.22%, whilst lower than the historical average, remains healthy and indicates effective asset utilisation.

⚠️ Growth-Profitability Paradox

Whilst Par Drugs maintains strong profitability metrics with ROCE of 30.53% and ROE of 15.44%, the company's five-year EBIT growth has contracted at an annual rate of 7.45%. This divergence between capital efficiency and growth trajectory suggests the company may be optimising existing operations whilst struggling to expand its business footprint—a concerning dynamic for long-term value creation.

The company's return on equity (ROE) averaged 15.44% over the measurement period, reflecting reasonable efficiency in generating returns for shareholders. Higher ROE indicates better capital efficiency and profitability, and Par Drugs' 15.44% average demonstrates solid performance in this regard. However, the latest ROE of 9.79% shows deterioration from historical levels, warranting close monitoring of whether this represents a temporary dip or the beginning of a structural decline in shareholder returns.

Balance sheet strength remains a notable positive, with Par Drugs operating as a virtually debt-free entity. The average net debt to equity ratio of -0.28 indicates the company holds net cash rather than net debt—a significant competitive advantage providing financial flexibility. Long-term debt stood at zero as of March 2025, with current liabilities of ₹16.57 crores easily manageable against current assets of ₹54.86 crores, yielding a healthy current ratio of approximately 3.31.

The company's shareholder funds have grown consistently from ₹40.61 crores in March 2020 to ₹98.97 crores in March 2025, representing a compound annual growth rate of approximately 19.50%. This steady accumulation of reserves, rising from ₹34.46 crores to ₹86.67 crores over the same period, demonstrates consistent profit retention and prudent capital allocation, even as the company navigates growth headwinds.

The Five-Year Decline: When Profitability Cannot Offset Shrinking Operations

The most troubling aspect of Par Drugs & Chemicals' investment profile emerges from its long-term growth trajectory. Whilst the company has achieved a five-year sales compound annual growth rate of 9.46%—a respectable figure in isolation—its five-year EBIT growth has contracted at an annual rate of 7.45%. This divergence between revenue growth and operating profit decline signals deteriorating operating leverage and suggests the company is struggling to translate top-line expansion into bottom-line growth.

Year Net Sales (₹ Cr) YoY Growth Operating Profit (₹ Cr) Operating Margin PAT (₹ Cr) PAT Margin
Mar'25 100.00 +5.3% 19.00 19.0% 13.00 13.0%
Mar'24 95.00 0.0% 22.00 23.2% 14.00 14.7%
Mar'23 95.00 +26.7% 18.00 18.9% 11.00 11.6%
Mar'22 75.00 +25.0% 16.00 21.3% 9.00 12.0%
Mar'21 60.00 +9.1% 16.00 26.7% 11.00 18.3%
Mar'20 55.00 9.00 16.4% 4.00 7.3%

The annual financial data reveals a company that achieved impressive growth during the post-pandemic recovery period (FY21-FY23) but has since struggled to maintain momentum. Operating profit peaked at ₹22.00 crores in FY24 with a margin of 23.2%, only to decline to ₹19.00 crores in FY25 despite revenue growth of 5.3%. This margin compression from 23.2% to 19.0% suggests rising input costs, competitive pricing pressures, or operational inefficiencies that management has yet to address effectively.

🚨 Critical Red Flag: Declining Operating Leverage

Par Drugs' inability to convert revenue growth into proportional profit growth represents a fundamental operational concern. The company's operating profit has declined from ₹22.00 crores in FY24 to ₹19.00 crores in FY25 despite sales increasing from ₹95.00 crores to ₹100.00 crores. This negative operating leverage suggests structural challenges in cost management, pricing power, or business mix that could continue pressuring profitability even as revenues grow.

Peer Comparison: Valuation Discount Reflects Fundamental Concerns

Par Drugs & Chemicals trades at a significant discount to most peers in the chemicals sector, reflecting market scepticism about its growth prospects despite reasonable profitability metrics. With a price-to-earnings ratio of 12.12x and price-to-book value of 1.19x, the company appears attractively valued on conventional metrics. However, this apparent cheapness must be evaluated against the company's negative EBIT growth trajectory and elevated volatility in quarterly results.

Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE (%) Debt/Equity Market Cap (₹ Cr)
Par Drugs & Chemicals 12.12 1.19 15.44 -0.28 124.83
Arvee Laboratories 438.05 5.57 9.99 -0.19
Indian Emulsions 10.75 1.74 20.01 0.31
Indian Phosphate 16.90 0.99 6.15 0.16
Mahickra Chemicals 53.64 3.80 8.65 0.43
Vital Chemtech 27.42 1.33 4.93 0.12

Par Drugs' ROE of 15.44% compares favourably against most peers, with only Indian Emulsions demonstrating superior capital efficiency at 20.01%. The company's debt-free status (negative debt-to-equity of -0.28) provides a competitive advantage over peers carrying leverage. However, the market's willingness to assign premium valuations to companies like Arvee Laboratories (438.05x P/E) and Mahickra Chemicals (53.64x P/E) suggests investors prioritise growth visibility over current profitability—an area where Par Drugs falls short.

The valuation discount becomes more understandable when considering that Indian Emulsions, trading at a similar P/E of 10.75x, delivers superior ROE of 20.01% whilst maintaining moderate leverage. Par Drugs' combination of declining EBIT growth, elevated quarterly volatility, and absence of institutional ownership creates a risk profile that justifies a valuation discount despite reasonable current profitability.

Valuation Analysis: Value Trap or Turnaround Opportunity?

Par Drugs & Chemicals presents a classic value investing dilemma: statistically cheap valuations that may reflect genuine fundamental concerns rather than market inefficiency. The company's price-to-earnings ratio of 12.12x sits well below the industry average of 17.00x, whilst its price-to-book value of 1.19x suggests the market values the company only marginally above its net asset value. The EV/EBITDA multiple of 6.66x appears particularly attractive for a profitable, debt-free manufacturer.

P/E Ratio (TTM)
12.12x
vs Industry: 17.00x
Price to Book Value
1.19x
Near Book Value
EV/EBITDA
6.66x
Attractive Multiple
Mojo Score
37/100
SELL Rating

However, the company's valuation grade of "Very Attractive" must be reconciled with its overall Mojo score of just 37/100 and a "SELL" rating. This disconnect highlights that valuation cheapness alone does not constitute an investment case when fundamental trends remain unfavourable. The stock's 52-week range of ₹81.01 to ₹190.24 illustrates extreme volatility, with the current price of ₹101.45 sitting 46.67% below its recent peak—a decline that reflects deteriorating investor confidence rather than temporary market pessimism.

The absence of dividend yield data and zero institutional ownership further complicate the valuation picture. Institutional investors, who typically conduct rigorous due diligence, have shown no interest in accumulating shares despite the apparently attractive valuation metrics. This institutional avoidance suggests sophisticated investors have identified fundamental concerns that outweigh the statistical cheapness.

"A low P/E ratio is only attractive if it reflects temporary challenges rather than permanent impairment—Par Drugs' declining EBIT growth suggests the latter may be at play."

Shareholding Pattern: Promoter Stability Amid Retail Dominance

Par Drugs & Chemicals' shareholding structure reveals a promoter-dominated company with minimal institutional participation—a pattern that creates both stability and liquidity concerns. Promoter holding has remained remarkably stable at approximately 73.37-73.41% over the past five quarters, with only a marginal 0.04% increase in Q3 FY26. This high and stable promoter stake signals management confidence but also limits free float and potentially constrains institutional interest.

Quarter Promoter QoQ Change FII MF Insurance Other DII Non-Institutional
Dec'25 73.41% +0.04% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 26.59%
Sep'25 73.37% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 26.63%
Jun'25 73.37% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 26.63%
Mar'25 73.37% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 26.63%
Dec'24 73.37% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 26.63%

The complete absence of foreign institutional investors (FIIs), mutual funds, insurance companies, and other domestic institutional investors (DIIs) represents a significant red flag. Zero institutional ownership in a publicly listed company typically indicates one or more of the following concerns: inadequate liquidity, limited analyst coverage, governance questions, or fundamental business model challenges that fail to meet institutional investment criteria. For Par Drugs, the lack of institutional interest likely stems from a combination of small market capitalisation (₹124.83 crores), elevated volatility, and uncertain growth trajectory.

The non-institutional shareholding of 26.59% consists entirely of retail investors and non-promoter entities, creating a shareholder base that may lack the resources and patience required to weather extended periods of operational challenges. The absence of sophisticated institutional investors also means the company receives limited analytical scrutiny and market discipline that often accompanies institutional ownership.

Positively, the company reports zero promoter pledging, eliminating concerns about financial distress among controlling shareholders. The key promoters—Jignesh Vallabhbhai Savani (21.88%), Falgun Vallabhbhai Savani (21.50%), and Saritaben Vallabhbhai Savani (20.52%)—maintain substantial stakes that align their interests with minority shareholders, though the concentration of control within a single family creates governance considerations typical of promoter-dominated Indian companies.

Stock Performance: Severe Underperformance Reflects Fundamental Weakness

Par Drugs & Chemicals' stock price performance presents one of the most compelling arguments against investment, with the shares delivering negative returns across virtually all meaningful timeframes. The stock has declined 41.57% over the past year, dramatically underperforming the Sensex's 10.41% gain by 51.98 percentage points. This severe underperformance extends across longer periods, with two-year returns of -51.47% and three-year returns of -37.78% painting a picture of sustained value destruction.

Period Par Drugs Return Sensex Return Alpha Interpretation
1 Day +4.94% -0.05% +4.99% Recent bounce
1 Week +10.77% +0.50% +10.27% Short-term strength
1 Month +8.22% +0.79% +7.43% Momentum building
3 Month +6.52% +0.43% +6.09% Positive trend
6 Month -1.50% +4.50% -6.00% Underperformance begins
YTD +0.19% -1.16% +1.35% Marginal outperformance
1 Year -41.57% +10.41% -51.98% Severe underperformance
2 Years -51.47% +17.65% -69.12% Sustained value destruction
3 Years -37.78% +38.81% -76.59% Long-term weakness
5 Years +212.15% +63.46% +148.69% Historical strength now fading

The returns analysis reveals a company that delivered exceptional performance over the five-year horizon (+212.15%) but has experienced severe deterioration in recent years. The inflection point appears to have occurred approximately two years ago, with the stock entering a sustained downtrend that has erased much of the earlier gains. The recent one-month (+8.22%) and three-month (+6.52%) positive returns suggest a potential stabilisation, but these short-term bounces must be viewed against the backdrop of multi-year underperformance.

The stock's beta of 1.50 indicates significantly higher volatility than the broader market, with the company classified as a "High Beta" stock. This elevated volatility creates substantial risk for investors, particularly given that the volatility has been predominantly to the downside over recent periods. The risk-adjusted return of -1.01 over the past year, combined with negative Sharpe ratio, places Par Drugs in the "HIGH RISK LOW RETURN" category—an unfavourable combination for risk-conscious investors.

Technical indicators paint a mixed picture, with the current trend classified as "Mildly Bearish" as of February 6, 2026. The stock trades above its 5-day (₹93.48), 20-day (₹91.36), 50-day (₹95.67), 100-day (₹98.41), and 200-day (₹99.63) moving averages, suggesting recent price strength. However, the broader technical framework remains cautious, with weekly MACD showing "Mildly Bullish" signals whilst monthly indicators remain "Bearish." The stock's distance of 46.67% below its 52-week high of ₹190.24 indicates substantial technical damage that would require sustained positive momentum to repair.

Investment Thesis: When Cheap Valuations Meet Structural Headwinds

Par Drugs & Chemicals presents an investment case characterised by contradictory signals that ultimately resolve in favour of caution. The company's Mojo score of 37/100 reflects this mixed assessment, with the proprietary scoring system weighing multiple factors including valuation attractiveness, quality metrics, financial trends, and technical positioning. The "SELL" rating, maintained since May 2025, indicates that the negative factors outweigh the positives sufficiently to warrant avoiding or exiting the investment.

Valuation Grade
Very Attractive
Statistical Cheapness
Quality Assessment
Average
Mixed Fundamentals
Financial Trend (Q3 FY26)
Positive
Recent Improvement
Technical Trend
Mildly Bearish
Cautious Signals

The investment thesis breaks down into four key dimensions. First, valuation appears "Very Attractive" with low multiples across P/E (12.12x), P/BV (1.19x), and EV/EBITDA (6.66x) ratios. However, this cheapness exists for legitimate reasons: declining EBIT growth (-7.45% CAGR over five years), elevated quarterly volatility, and complete absence of institutional validation. The market's valuation discount reflects rational assessment of risk rather than inefficient pricing.

Second, quality metrics present a mixed picture. The company demonstrates strong capital efficiency (ROCE of 30.53%, ROE of 15.44%) and maintains a debt-free balance sheet—significant positives. However, these strengths are offset by deteriorating growth trends, absence of institutional ownership, and "Average" quality grade that reflects concerns about sustainable competitive positioning. The five-year sales growth of 9.46% appears reasonable but fails to translate into operating profit growth, suggesting margin pressures or business mix challenges.

Third, the financial trend has turned "Positive" in Q3 FY26, with the company posting record quarterly revenue and improved profitability. This recent operational improvement provides a glimmer of hope for potential turnaround. However, one or two quarters of positive performance do not constitute a sustainable trend, particularly given the company's history of volatile quarterly results. Investors must see sustained improvement over multiple quarters before concluding that fundamental trajectory has genuinely changed.

Fourth, technical positioning remains "Mildly Bearish" despite recent price strength. The stock's severe underperformance over one, two, and three-year periods has created technical damage that requires extended periods of positive price action to repair. The high beta of 1.50 and classification as "HIGH RISK LOW RETURN" further diminish the investment appeal for risk-adjusted return-focused investors.

Key Strengths & Risk Factors

KEY STRENGTHS

  • Debt-Free Balance Sheet: Zero long-term debt with net cash position (debt-to-equity of -0.28) provides financial flexibility and reduces bankruptcy risk significantly.
  • Strong Capital Efficiency: Average ROCE of 30.53% demonstrates management's ability to generate substantial returns from deployed capital, well above cost of capital.
  • Improving Quarterly Momentum: Q3 FY26 delivered record quarterly revenue of ₹29.34 crores with net profit of ₹4.80 crores, showing sequential improvement in operations.
  • Stable Promoter Holding: Consistent 73%+ promoter stake with zero pledging indicates management confidence and alignment with minority shareholders.
  • Reasonable Profitability: ROE of 15.44% and PAT margins of 16.36% in Q3 FY26 demonstrate ability to generate profits from operations.
  • Attractive Valuation Multiples: P/E of 12.12x and P/BV of 1.19x represent significant discounts to industry averages, offering potential value for turnaround scenarios.
  • Growing Reserves: Shareholder funds increased from ₹40.61 crores (Mar'20) to ₹98.97 crores (Mar'25), showing consistent profit retention and capital accumulation.

KEY CONCERNS

  • Declining EBIT Growth: Five-year EBIT contraction of 7.45% annually represents fundamental deterioration in operating profitability despite revenue growth.
  • Severe Stock Underperformance: One-year return of -41.57% and three-year return of -37.78% indicate sustained value destruction and negative market sentiment.
  • Zero Institutional Ownership: Complete absence of FII, mutual fund, and insurance holdings suggests sophisticated investors have identified fundamental concerns.
  • Extreme Quarterly Volatility: Revenue swings from ₹34.66 crores to ₹21.38 crores quarter-on-quarter indicate unpredictable business patterns or lumpy order execution.
  • High Beta Risk Profile: Beta of 1.50 with "HIGH RISK LOW RETURN" classification creates unfavourable risk-adjusted return dynamics for investors.
  • Negative Operating Leverage: Operating profit declined from ₹22.00 crores (FY24) to ₹19.00 crores (FY25) despite sales growth, indicating margin pressure.
  • Limited Free Float: With 73.41% promoter holding, only 26.59% available for trading creates liquidity constraints and limits institutional participation potential.

Outlook: What to Watch in Coming Quarters

POSITIVE CATALYSTS

  • Sustained Revenue Growth: Continuation of Q3 FY26 momentum with quarterly sales consistently above ₹28-30 crores would signal genuine operational improvement.
  • Margin Stabilisation: Operating margins stabilising in 20-22% range across multiple quarters would indicate management has addressed cost pressures.
  • Institutional Interest: Entry of mutual funds or FIIs into shareholding would validate investment thesis and improve liquidity profile.
  • Consistent Profitability: Net profit consistently above ₹4 crores per quarter would demonstrate sustainable earnings power rather than episodic performance.
  • Order Book Visibility: Management commentary providing visibility into order pipeline would reduce concerns about lumpy revenue patterns.

RED FLAGS TO MONITOR

  • Revenue Volatility Recurrence: Return to large quarter-on-quarter swings in sales would confirm structural business unpredictability rather than temporary phase.
  • Margin Compression: Operating margins falling below 18% would signal competitive pressures or cost management failures intensifying.
  • Continued Institutional Avoidance: Persistent zero institutional ownership despite "attractive" valuations would indicate deeper fundamental concerns.
  • Technical Breakdown: Stock falling below ₹81 (52-week low) would trigger fresh selling and potentially invalidate recent stabilisation narrative.
  • Cash Deployment Concerns: Investments growing from ₹25.07 crores without clear strategic rationale could indicate capital allocation challenges.

The forward outlook for Par Drugs & Chemicals hinges critically on management's ability to demonstrate that Q3 FY26's strong performance represents the beginning of a sustainable turnaround rather than another episodic spike in an otherwise volatile trajectory. Investors should demand evidence of consistent execution across multiple quarters before concluding that the company has addressed its fundamental growth challenges. The absence of institutional ownership means retail investors bear the full burden of validating the turnaround thesis—a risky proposition given the company's track record.

The Verdict: Statistical Cheapness Cannot Overcome Structural Concerns

SELL

Score: 37/100

For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions despite attractive valuation multiples. The combination of declining five-year EBIT growth, severe stock underperformance, zero institutional validation, and extreme quarterly volatility creates an unfavourable risk-reward profile. Wait for sustained evidence of operational turnaround across multiple quarters and potential institutional interest before considering entry.

For Existing Holders: Consider using any near-term strength to exit positions or reduce exposure. Whilst Q3 FY26 results show improvement, one quarter does not constitute a trend reversal. The stock's 41.57% decline over the past year and complete absence of institutional support suggest the market has identified fundamental concerns that outweigh current profitability. Book losses and redeploy capital into companies with more predictable growth trajectories.

Fair Value Estimate: ₹95-100 range (approximately current levels), suggesting limited upside potential. The market appears to have priced the stock fairly given fundamental challenges, with the "Very Attractive" valuation grade reflecting appropriate risk discounting rather than opportunity.

Note— ROCE = (EBIT - Other Income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)

⚠️ Investment Disclaimer

This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance does not guarantee future results, and all investments carry risk of loss.

{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News