Pasupati Spinning & Weaving Mills Q2 FY26: Marginal Growth Masks Structural Challenges

The quarter's performance reveals a company struggling with razor-thin margins and inconsistent profitability despite modest revenue growth. With net sales rising 18.76% quarter-on-quarter to ₹24.69 crores but up only 1.69% year-on-year, Pasupati Spinning faces the twin challenges of volatile demand and intense competitive pressure in the garments and apparels sector. The company's PAT margin of 0.69% and operating margin of 7.61% underscore the difficult economics of the textile manufacturing business.

Financial Performance: Sequential Recovery Belies Weak Fundamentals

Pasupati Spinning's Q2 FY26 financial performance presents a tale of modest sequential improvement against a backdrop of persistent structural weaknesses. Net sales of ₹24.69 crores marked an 18.76% quarter-on-quarter increase from ₹20.79 crores in Q1 FY26, recovering from the sharp 25.35% decline witnessed in the previous quarter. However, the year-on-year growth of just 1.69% from ₹24.28 crores in Q2 FY25 reveals stagnating top-line momentum in an already challenging textile market.

The company's operating profit (excluding other income) improved to ₹1.88 crores from ₹0.97 crores quarter-on-quarter, translating to an operating margin expansion of 293 basis points to 7.61%. This improvement, whilst welcome, remains fragile when viewed against the company's historical volatility—operating margins have swung between 4.67% and 8.34% over the past seven quarters. The gross profit margin of 3.56% in Q2 FY26, up from 2.89% in Q1 FY26, continues to reflect the company's limited pricing power and intense raw material cost pressures characteristic of the textile manufacturing sector.

Net profit of ₹0.17 crores represents a dramatic turnaround from Q1 FY26's near-breakeven ₹0.01 crores, but this sequential improvement must be contextualised against the company's history of quarterly profit volatility. The PAT margin of 0.69% remains anaemic by any standard, barely covering the cost of capital. Interest costs of ₹1.10 crores consumed 4.46% of revenues, whilst depreciation of ₹0.59 crores added another 2.39%, leaving minimal room for bottom-line expansion even when operational efficiency improves.

Operational Challenges: Weak Returns and High Leverage

The company's operational metrics paint a concerning picture of capital inefficiency and financial stress. Return on Equity (ROE) stands at a meagre 1.69% on average, with the latest figure at 3.40%—far below the cost of equity capital and indicating that the company barely generates value for shareholders. This weak ROE reflects not just low profitability but also the burden of a highly leveraged balance sheet. Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) averages just 1.90%, with the latest reading at 5.30%, signalling that the company struggles to generate adequate returns from its invested capital base of fixed assets and working capital.

The company's balance sheet reveals significant financial stress. Long-term debt stood at ₹6.24 crores as of March 2025, up from ₹3.95 crores in the previous year, whilst current liabilities of ₹63.18 crores dwarf shareholder funds of ₹31.50 crores. The debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 8.85 times is alarmingly high, indicating that the company would need nearly nine years of current EBITDA to pay off its debt—a clear red flag for financial stability. Net debt to equity of 1.68 times further underscores the precarious capital structure, with debt exceeding equity by a substantial margin.

Working capital management presents another area of concern. Trade payables of ₹8.53 crores and other current liabilities of ₹6.46 crores suggest the company is relying heavily on supplier credit and short-term financing to fund operations. Cash flow from operations of ₹4.00 crores in FY25, whilst positive, declined from ₹5.00 crores in FY24, and the company's closing cash position of near-zero (₹0.00 crores in FY25) leaves no buffer for unexpected challenges. The EBIT to interest coverage ratio of just 0.58 times means that operating profits don't even cover interest expenses, forcing the company to rely on other income or asset sales to service debt.

Industry Context: Navigating Textile Sector Headwinds

The Indian textile and garments sector has faced persistent headwinds over the past two years, with subdued global demand, rising input costs, and intense competition from low-cost manufacturers squeezing margins across the value chain. Pasupati Spinning operates in the highly commoditised synthetic blended yarn and polyester viscose segments, where pricing power is limited and profitability depends heavily on operational efficiency and scale advantages that the company currently lacks.

The company's installed capacity of 26,000 spindles for synthetic blended yarn and 25,000 spindles for polyester viscose positions it as a small player in a fragmented market dominated by larger, more efficient manufacturers. The five-year sales growth of just 1.60% reflects not only sector challenges but also the company's inability to gain market share or expand its customer base meaningfully. With FY25 revenues of ₹100.00 crores declining 6.50% from FY24's ₹107.00 crores, the company is losing ground even as the broader textile sector shows signs of stabilisation.

The company's diversification into fabrics, bed sheets, acrylic fibre, and commodity trading has not provided the buffer against cyclicality that management likely envisioned. Instead, this diversification appears to have diluted focus without generating meaningful incremental profitability. The operating margin of 6.00% in FY25 remains well below industry leaders who typically operate at double-digit EBITDA margins through superior operational efficiency, vertical integration, or focus on higher-margin value-added products.

Peer Comparison: Lagging Industry Performance

When benchmarked against peers in the garments and apparels sector, Pasupati Spinning's valuation and fundamental metrics reveal significant underperformance. The company trades at a P/E ratio of 31.34x, substantially higher than peers like Gem Spinners (4.62x) and Piotex Industries (9.49x), despite delivering far inferior returns on equity. This valuation premium appears unjustified given the company's weak fundamentals.

Pasupati Spinning's ROE of 1.69% ranks amongst the weakest in the peer group, with only Piotex Industries demonstrating healthy capital efficiency at 37.52% ROE. The company's debt-to-equity ratio of 1.68x is significantly higher than most peers, with only Maris Spinners (3.71x) showing greater leverage. This combination of high leverage and low returns creates a precarious situation where the company struggles to generate sufficient cash flows to service debt whilst simultaneously investing in growth.

The price-to-book ratio of 1.06x might appear reasonable on the surface, but it must be viewed in the context of the company's inability to generate meaningful returns on that book value. Investors are essentially paying a premium for assets that generate sub-par returns, a classic value trap scenario. The company's market capitalisation of ₹35.00 crores positions it as a micro-cap stock with limited institutional interest and high liquidity risk.

Valuation Analysis: Premium Pricing for Subpar Fundamentals

Despite its weak operational performance, Pasupati Spinning trades at valuation multiples that appear disconnected from underlying fundamentals. The P/E ratio of 31.34x represents a significant premium to the sector average of approximately 23x, an anomaly given the company's marginal profitability and structural challenges. This elevated multiple likely reflects the illiquid nature of the stock and the small free float rather than investor confidence in future earnings growth.

The price-to-book value of 1.06x suggests the market values the company's assets at slightly above their accounting value, but this metric loses relevance when those assets generate returns below the cost of capital. The EV/EBITDA multiple of 13.82x and EV/EBIT of 20.84x appear expensive relative to the quality of earnings and growth prospects. The EV/Sales ratio of 0.88x indicates the market values the entire enterprise at nearly 90% of annual revenues—a generous valuation for a company with net margins below 1%.

The PEG ratio of 0.18x might suggest the stock is undervalued relative to growth, but this metric is misleading given the volatility and low base of earnings. The company's valuation grade of "Attractive" appears overly optimistic when fundamental quality metrics are factored in. Fair value analysis suggests the stock should trade closer to book value or below, given the weak ROE and high leverage, implying potential downside from current levels of ₹34.05.

Shareholding Pattern: Minimal Institutional Confidence

The shareholding pattern of Pasupati Spinning reveals a concerning lack of institutional interest, which typically serves as a quality signal for long-term investors. Promoter holding stands at just 10.00%, an unusually low level that raises questions about promoter commitment and alignment with minority shareholders. This has remained unchanged across the past five quarters, suggesting no meaningful promoter participation in the company's equity story.

Foreign institutional investors (FIIs) hold no stake in the company, whilst mutual fund holding stands at a negligible 0.03% across just six funds. Insurance companies have no exposure, and other domestic institutional investors (DIIs) hold only 0.31%. This near-total absence of institutional ownership reflects the company's weak fundamentals, illiquidity, and lack of corporate governance visibility that typically attracts professional investors.

The non-institutional shareholding of 24.76% has remained static, suggesting minimal trading activity and poor liquidity. With 10.00% of promoter shares pledged, there exists additional risk of forced selling in adverse market conditions. The shareholding pattern essentially indicates that the stock is held primarily by retail investors and promoters with limited financial flexibility, creating a shareholder base that may not provide stability during periods of stress.

Stock Performance: Underperforming Across Timeframes

Pasupati Spinning's stock price performance reveals consistent underperformance relative to broader market indices across most meaningful timeframes. The stock has declined 2.77% in the past day and 5.42% over the past week, significantly underperforming the Sensex which gained 1.16% weekly. The one-month return of 5.42% represents a brief respite, outperforming the Sensex's 2.62% gain by 2.80 percentage points, but this appears to be a temporary bounce rather than a sustained trend reversal.

Medium-term performance has been particularly disappointing, with the stock down 4.62% over three months and 9.44% over six months, whilst the Sensex gained 4.44% and 3.50% respectively during these periods. Year-to-date, the stock has declined 2.16% against the Sensex's 7.73% gain, generating negative alpha of 9.89 percentage points. The one-year return of 3.18% trails the Sensex's 8.50%, reinforcing the pattern of consistent underperformance.

Longer-term returns paint a more favourable picture, with three-year gains of 43.37% outperforming the Sensex's 36.60%, and five-year returns of 300.59% dramatically exceeding the index's 92.90% gain. However, these longer-term gains must be viewed in context—they likely reflect recovery from extremely depressed levels during the COVID-19 pandemic rather than sustainable value creation. The stock's high beta of 1.50 indicates it is 50% more volatile than the market, amplifying both gains and losses whilst exposing investors to heightened risk.

Technical indicators suggest caution, with the stock in a "Mildly Bearish" trend since November 6, 2025. The stock trades below all key moving averages—5-day (₹36.50), 20-day (₹35.15), 50-day (₹35.06), 100-day (₹34.92), and 200-day (₹35.56)—indicating weak momentum and lack of buying support. With the stock 25.16% below its 52-week high of ₹45.50 and only 17.90% above its 52-week low of ₹28.88, there remains significant downside risk if fundamentals continue to disappoint.

Investment Thesis: Weak Fundamentals Outweigh Valuation Appeal

The investment thesis for Pasupati Spinning rests on shaky foundations despite the company's "Attractive" valuation grade. The Mojo score of 31 out of 100 with a "SELL" rating accurately reflects the fundamental challenges facing the business. The company's below-average quality grade, flat financial trend, and mildly bearish technical outlook combine to create a negative investment proposition that outweighs any perceived valuation appeal.

The company's key strengths are limited. The half-yearly ROCE of 7.24% represents the highest level in recent periods, suggesting some operational improvement. The five-year EBIT growth of 43.24% indicates the company has managed to expand operating profits from a low base. The PEG ratio of 0.18x might suggest value relative to growth, though this metric's reliability is questionable given earnings volatility.

However, these marginal positives are overwhelmed by significant structural weaknesses. The average ROCE of 1.90% and ROE of 1.69% indicate the company destroys shareholder value over time. The EBIT to interest coverage of just 0.58 times means the company cannot service its debt from operating profits. Debt-to-EBITDA of 8.85 times represents an unsustainable leverage position. Operating cash flow has declined to ₹4.37 crores annually, the lowest in recent years, whilst cash and cash equivalents have fallen to ₹0.88 crores on a half-yearly basis, creating liquidity concerns.

Key Strengths & Risk Factors

Outlook: What Lies Ahead