Polyplex Corporation Q2 FY26: Margin Pressure Intensifies as Profits Plunge 71.87%

Nov 15 2025 10:10 AM IST
share
Share Via
Polyplex Corporation Ltd., a leading manufacturer of Biaxially Oriented Polyethylene Terephthalate (BOPET) films, reported a sharp deterioration in its Q2 FY26 financial performance, with consolidated net profit plummeting 71.87% year-on-year to ₹24.70 crores from ₹87.81 crores in the corresponding quarter last year. The ₹2,868 crore market capitalisation company, which trades at ₹897.00 on the NSE, has witnessed its stock price decline 3.52% following the results announcement, reflecting investor concerns about sustained margin compression and operational challenges.



The quarter revealed troubling trends across multiple financial metrics, with operating margins excluding other income contracting to 5.72% from 10.98% a year ago, whilst the company's net profit margin compressed to just 1.87% from 9.44% in Q2 FY25. The sequential comparison proved equally concerning, as the company swung from a loss of ₹19.31 crores in Q1 FY26 to a modest profit, though still representing a significant decline from historical performance levels.





Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

₹24.70 Cr

▼ 71.87% YoY



Revenue Growth

+3.17%

YoY Increase



Operating Margin (Excl OI)

5.72%

▼ 527 bps YoY



Average ROE

10.11%

Below Industry Standards




The company's performance reflects a challenging operating environment in the packaging sector, where raw material volatility and competitive pressures have severely impacted profitability. Despite achieving marginal revenue growth of 3.17% year-on-year to ₹1,794.04 crores in Q2 FY26, Polyplex struggled to translate top-line expansion into bottom-line growth, with operating profit before depreciation, interest, and tax (excluding other income) declining substantially to ₹102.53 crores from ₹190.91 crores in the year-ago quarter.









































































Quarter Revenue (₹ Cr) QoQ Growth Net Profit (₹ Cr) YoY Growth Operating Margin
Sep'25 1,794.04 +3.18% 24.70 -71.87% 5.72%
Jun'25 1,738.67 -0.05% -19.31 -136.08% -0.04%
Mar'25 1,739.56 +1.07% 10.11 +20.07% 3.67%
Dec'24 1,721.16 -1.02% 57.77 7.04%
Sep'24 1,738.86 +3.16% 87.81 10.98%
Jun'24 1,685.60 +0.41% 53.52 9.72%
Mar'24 1,678.69 8.42 5.75%



Financial Performance: Margin Erosion Accelerates



The quarter-on-quarter analysis reveals a company attempting to stabilise after a disastrous Q1 FY26, where it posted a consolidated loss of ₹19.31 crores. Whilst Q2 FY26 marked a return to profitability with ₹24.70 crores in net profit, this represented a sequential improvement that failed to mask the underlying deterioration when compared to the same period last year. Net sales grew a modest 3.18% sequentially to ₹1,794.04 crores, marking the highest quarterly revenue in recent periods, yet the company's ability to convert this revenue into profits remained severely compromised.



Operating margins excluding other income stood at 5.72% in Q2 FY26, recovering from the negative territory of -0.04% in Q1 FY26 but still significantly below the 10.98% achieved in Q2 FY25. This 527 basis points year-on-year contraction in operating margins signals fundamental challenges in the company's cost structure and pricing power. The gross profit margin of 6.26% in Q2 FY26, whilst an improvement from Q1's 0.87%, remained substantially below the 16.14% recorded in the corresponding quarter of the previous fiscal year.



Employee costs rose to ₹185.32 crores in Q2 FY26 from ₹148.26 crores a year ago, representing a 24.98% increase that outpaced revenue growth significantly. This disproportionate rise in personnel expenses contributed materially to margin compression. The company's profit after tax margin of 1.87% in Q2 FY26 marked a dramatic decline from the 9.44% achieved in Q2 FY25, underscoring the severity of profitability challenges facing the organisation.





Revenue (Q2 FY26)

₹1,794.04 Cr

▲ 3.17% YoY



Net Profit (Q2 FY26)

₹24.70 Cr

▼ 71.87% YoY



Operating Margin (Excl OI)

5.72%

vs 10.98% YoY



PAT Margin

1.87%

vs 9.44% YoY




Operational Challenges: Profitability Under Severe Pressure



The company's return on equity (ROE) of 10.11% on an average basis, whilst positive, remains substantially below industry benchmarks and reflects inefficient capital deployment. The latest half-yearly ROCE of just 2.77% represents the lowest level in recent periods, indicating deteriorating returns on invested capital. This compression in profitability metrics suggests that Polyplex is struggling to generate adequate returns relative to the capital employed in its operations, raising questions about the sustainability of its business model in the current market environment.



A particularly concerning aspect of Q2 FY26 performance was the company's heavy reliance on other income, which constituted 97.06% of profit before tax. This dependency on non-operating income to support profitability indicates that core operations are barely breaking even, with other income of ₹22.77 crores in Q2 FY26 proving crucial to the company's ability to post a profit. Whilst other income declined from ₹100.35 crores in Q2 FY25, it remained disproportionately significant relative to operating profits.



The balance sheet reveals a company with reasonable financial strength, with shareholder funds of ₹3,763.20 crores as of March 2025 and relatively modest long-term debt of ₹345.19 crores, resulting in a low debt-to-equity ratio. The company's debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 1.22 and net debt-to-equity of 0.01 suggest manageable leverage levels. However, the concerning aspect lies in the deteriorating cash flow from operations, which declined to ₹438.03 crores in FY25 from ₹455.00 crores in FY24, representing the lowest level in recent years despite the company's scale.




Critical Profitability Concerns


Operating Profit Before Tax and Other Income (PBTO): At just ₹0.69 crores in Q2 FY26, PBTO has fallen 77.0% compared to the previous four-quarter average, indicating that core business operations are generating minimal profits. The company's dependence on other income to maintain profitability raises serious questions about the sustainability of earnings quality and operational efficiency in the current challenging market environment.




Industry Context: Packaging Sector Headwinds



The packaging industry has faced significant headwinds in recent quarters, with raw material price volatility, competitive intensity, and demand fluctuations impacting profitability across the sector. Polyplex's performance reflects these broader industry challenges, though the magnitude of margin compression experienced by the company appears more severe than some peers. The BOPET film segment, in particular, has witnessed pricing pressures as global capacity additions have outpaced demand growth, creating an oversupplied market that has eroded pricing power for manufacturers.



The company's 5-year sales growth of 8.42% demonstrates moderate top-line expansion over the long term, though this has not translated into proportionate profit growth. In fact, the 5-year EBIT growth rate of -159.75% reveals a dramatic deterioration in operating profitability over time, suggesting structural challenges in the business model that extend beyond cyclical factors. This negative EBIT growth trajectory indicates that despite growing revenues, the company has been unable to maintain or improve its operational efficiency and profitability.



Polyplex's competitive positioning within the packaging sector has weakened, as evidenced by its consistent underperformance against the benchmark Sensex over the past three years. The stock has delivered a negative 49.12% return over three years compared to the Sensex's positive 37.22% return, resulting in a substantial negative alpha of -86.34%. This underperformance reflects investor concerns about the company's ability to navigate industry challenges and restore profitability to historical levels.

































































Company P/E (TTM) Div Yield ROE % Debt/Equity P/BV
Polyplex Corporation 38.43x 1.50% 10.11% 0.01 0.75x
EPL Ltd 15.42x 2.49% 13.00% 0.25 2.72x
AGI Greenpac 14.45x 0.89% 14.46% 0.20 2.30x
Uflex 12.32x 0.58% 9.31% 0.97 0.51x
TCPL Packaging 22.27x 0.92% 20.11% 0.98 4.62x
XPRO India 180.41x 0.19% 16.14% 0.07 3.56x



Peer Comparison: Valuation Premium Unjustified by Fundamentals



When compared to its packaging sector peers, Polyplex Corporation presents a paradoxical valuation picture. The company trades at a P/E ratio of 38.43x, significantly higher than peers such as EPL Ltd (15.42x), AGI Greenpac (14.45x), and Uflex (12.32x). This valuation premium appears unjustified given Polyplex's inferior ROE of 10.11%, which trails the peer group average of approximately 15%. The company's ROE lags behind EPL Ltd (13.00%), AGI Greenpac (14.46%), XPRO India (16.14%), and particularly TCPL Packaging (20.11%).



The price-to-book value ratio of 0.75x for Polyplex stands in stark contrast to the peer average of approximately 2.7x, with EPL Ltd trading at 2.72x, AGI Greenpac at 2.30x, and TCPL Packaging commanding a premium 4.62x multiple. This substantial discount to book value suggests that the market has significant concerns about the company's ability to generate returns on its asset base, despite the elevated P/E ratio. The disconnect between a high P/E and low P/BV typically indicates market scepticism about earnings sustainability and future growth prospects.



Polyplex's dividend yield of 1.50% provides some compensation to shareholders and exceeds most peers, with the company maintaining a dividend payout ratio of 20.63%. However, this yield advantage alone cannot justify the valuation premium, particularly given the deteriorating earnings trajectory. The company's debt-to-equity ratio of 0.01 represents a significant strength relative to peers such as Uflex (0.97) and TCPL Packaging (0.98), indicating conservative financial management and lower financial risk.




"With operating margins collapsing to 5.72% and profitability heavily dependent on other income, Polyplex faces fundamental challenges that require urgent strategic intervention to restore investor confidence."


Valuation Analysis: Premium Unwarranted Despite Book Value Discount



At the current market price of ₹897.00, Polyplex Corporation trades at a P/E ratio of 38x, representing a premium to the industry average P/E of 40x. However, this valuation appears stretched given the company's deteriorating financial performance and below-par return ratios. The EV/EBITDA multiple of 9.94x and EV/Sales ratio of 0.41x provide additional context to the valuation framework, though these metrics must be interpreted cautiously given the recent margin compression.



The price-to-book value of 0.75x suggests the market is valuing the company's assets at a 25% discount to their book value, with the stock trading at ₹897.00 against a book value per share of ₹1,176.28. This discount typically reflects concerns about asset quality, earning power, or both. Given the company's declining ROCE of 6.31% (latest) from an average of 17.02%, the market's scepticism about the company's ability to generate adequate returns on its asset base appears justified.



The stock's valuation grade has oscillated between "Fair" and "Expensive" in recent months, currently sitting at "Fair" as of October 13, 2025. However, given the continued deterioration in operating performance and the company's failure to demonstrate a credible turnaround path, even this "Fair" designation appears generous. The 52-week price range of ₹892.85 to ₹1,480.00 shows the stock currently trading near its yearly lows, having declined 39.39% from its peak, reflecting sustained selling pressure and diminishing investor confidence.





P/E Ratio (TTM)

38x

vs Industry 40x



P/BV Ratio

0.75x

25% Discount to Book



Dividend Yield

1.50%

₹4.50 per share



Overall Score

26/100

STRONG SELL




Shareholding Pattern: Promoter Dominance with Limited Institutional Interest



The shareholding structure of Polyplex Corporation is characterised by overwhelming promoter control, with promoter holding steady at 99.94% across the last five quarters. This near-complete promoter ownership, whilst providing stability and alignment of interests, also limits free float and liquidity in the stock. The key promoter entities include Secure Investments Limited (22.1%), Bhilangana Hydro Power Limited (1.93%), and members of the Saraf family, indicating concentrated family control over the company's operations and strategic direction.



Foreign Institutional Investor (FII) holdings have shown modest fluctuation, increasing from 7.39% in September 2024 to 9.31% in September 2025, with a notable sequential jump of 2.21 percentage points in Q2 FY26. This increase in FII interest, though marginal, suggests some international investors may be viewing the current price levels as attractive for accumulation, despite the operational challenges. However, the overall institutional holding of just 12.09% remains relatively modest, indicating limited conviction from professional investors about the company's near-term prospects.



Mutual fund holdings have declined marginally from 2.37% in September 2024 to 2.26% in September 2025, with sequential reductions in recent quarters suggesting domestic institutional investors have been reducing exposure. Insurance company holdings remain at zero across all reported periods, indicating a complete absence of interest from this conservative investor category. The non-institutional holdings of 61.21% in September 2025, down from 63.10% a year ago, reflect the limited free float available for trading given the dominant promoter stake.

























































Quarter Promoter % FII % MF % Insurance % Other DII %
Sep'25 99.94% 9.31% (+2.21%) 2.26% (-0.02%) 0.00% 0.52% (-0.15%)
Jun'25 99.94% 7.10% (-0.57%) 2.28% (-0.05%) 0.00% 0.67% (+0.18%)
Mar'25 99.94% 7.67% (-0.15%) 2.33% (-0.44%) 0.00% 0.49% (+0.01%)
Dec'24 99.94% 7.82% (+0.43%) 2.77% (+0.40%) 0.00% 0.48% (+0.04%)
Sep'24 99.94% 7.39% 2.37% 0.00% 0.44%



Stock Performance: Severe Underperformance Across All Timeframes



Polyplex Corporation's stock performance has been dismal across virtually all timeframes, with the stock delivering negative returns and massive underperformance relative to the benchmark Sensex. Over the past year, the stock has declined 25.11% whilst the Sensex gained 9.00%, resulting in a negative alpha of -34.11%. This underperformance has intensified in recent months, with the stock down 16.41% over three months compared to the Sensex's gain of 4.92%, producing a negative alpha of -21.33%.



The year-to-date performance paints an even grimmer picture, with Polyplex declining 30.85% whilst the Sensex advanced 8.22%, resulting in a negative alpha of -39.07%. Short-term performance has been equally poor, with the stock down 7.84% over one month (versus Sensex's +3.09%) and down 3.29% over one week (versus Sensex's +1.62%). The most recent trading session saw the stock decline 3.52%, underperforming the Sensex's marginal 0.10% gain by 362 basis points.



Medium to long-term returns reveal a pattern of sustained underperformance, with the stock down 28.97% over six months (Sensex +3.97%), down 15.02% over two years (Sensex +30.23%), and down 49.12% over three years (Sensex +37.22%). The stock's risk-adjusted returns have been particularly poor, with a negative risk-adjusted return of -0.71 over one year and volatility of 35.61%, categorising it as a "HIGH RISK LOW RETURN" investment. The stock's beta of 1.35 indicates it is significantly more volatile than the market, amplifying losses during market downturns.





































































Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Day -3.52% +0.10% -3.62%
1 Week -3.29% +1.62% -4.91%
1 Month -7.84% +3.09% -10.93%
3 Months -16.41% +4.92% -21.33%
6 Months -28.97% +3.97% -32.94%
YTD -30.85% +8.22% -39.07%
1 Year -25.11% +9.00% -34.11%
2 Years -15.02% +30.23% -45.25%
3 Years -49.12% +37.22% -86.34%



Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags Warrant Caution



The investment thesis for Polyplex Corporation has deteriorated significantly, with the company's proprietary Mojo Score standing at just 26 out of 100, firmly in "STRONG SELL" territory. This low score reflects a confluence of negative factors including bearish technical trends, negative financial trends, poor long-term growth metrics, and consistent underperformance against benchmarks. The company's quality grade has been downgraded to "Average" from "Good" in prior periods, reflecting the sustained deterioration in financial performance and operational metrics.



The valuation assessment presents a mixed picture, with the stock rated as "Fair" but carrying significant risks. Whilst the price-to-book discount of 25% might appear attractive superficially, it reflects legitimate concerns about the company's ability to generate adequate returns on its asset base. The technical trend remains firmly bearish, with the stock trading below all major moving averages (5-day, 20-day, 50-day, 100-day, and 200-day), and multiple technical indicators flashing bearish signals including MACD, Bollinger Bands, and Dow Theory.



The financial trend is categorised as "Negative" based on Q2 FY26 results, with key concerns including the lowest operating cash flow in recent years (₹438.03 crores annually), profit before tax less other income declining 77.0% versus the previous four-quarter average, and the lowest half-yearly ROCE of 2.77%. The company's heavy dependence on non-operating income, which constituted 97.06% of profit before tax in Q2 FY26, raises serious questions about earnings quality and the sustainability of profitability.





Valuation Grade

Fair

Risky Profile



Quality Grade

Average

Downgraded from Good



Financial Trend

Negative

Deteriorating



Technical Trend

Bearish

All MAs Broken




Key Strengths & Risk Factors





KEY STRENGTHS



  • Strong Balance Sheet: Low debt-to-equity ratio of 0.01 and manageable debt-to-EBITDA of 1.22 provide financial flexibility and low financial risk compared to peers

  • Stable Promoter Holding: Consistent 99.94% promoter stake ensures alignment of interests and strategic stability, with no dilution concerns

  • Healthy Interest Coverage: Average EBIT-to-interest ratio of 20.92x demonstrates strong ability to service debt obligations comfortably

  • Dividend Consistency: Maintains dividend payout with 1.50% yield and 20.63% payout ratio, providing some income support to shareholders

  • Market Leadership: Established position as a leading BOPET film manufacturer with long operating history since 1984

  • Improving Sequential Performance: Return to profitability in Q2 FY26 after Q1 loss shows some stabilisation efforts




KEY CONCERNS



  • Severe Margin Compression: Operating margins collapsed to 5.72% from 10.98% YoY, with PAT margins declining to 1.87% from 9.44%, indicating fundamental profitability challenges

  • Deteriorating Returns: Latest ROCE of 6.31% and ROE of 5.56% represent significant declines from historical averages, with half-yearly ROCE at lowest level of 2.77%

  • Heavy Other Income Dependency: Other income constituted 97.06% of PBT in Q2 FY26, indicating core operations are barely profitable

  • Negative Long-term Growth: 5-year EBIT growth of -159.75% reveals structural deterioration despite 8.42% sales CAGR

  • Consistent Underperformance: Stock down 49.12% over three years versus Sensex's 37.22% gain, with negative alpha across all timeframes

  • Weak Institutional Interest: Total institutional holding of just 12.09% with zero insurance company participation reflects lack of professional investor confidence

  • High Volatility: Beta of 1.35 and volatility of 35.61% categorise it as high-risk investment with poor risk-adjusted returns





Outlook: Critical Monitoring Points for Investors





POSITIVE CATALYSTS



  • Sustained sequential margin improvement in coming quarters demonstrating operational turnaround

  • Reduction in dependence on other income with core operations returning to healthy profitability

  • Market share gains or pricing power improvement in BOPET segment

  • Cost optimisation initiatives successfully reducing employee costs as percentage of revenue

  • Capacity utilisation improvements driving operating leverage benefits




RED FLAGS TO WATCH



  • Further margin compression in Q3 FY26 indicating structural rather than cyclical challenges

  • Continued heavy reliance on other income to support profitability

  • Operating cash flow declining below ₹400 crores annually

  • ROCE remaining below 5% on half-yearly basis for consecutive periods

  • Institutional investors (FIIs/MFs) reducing stakes significantly in coming quarters

  • Stock breaking below ₹850 levels (52-week low support) on sustained basis

  • Raw material cost pressures intensifying without corresponding pricing power






The Verdict: Avoid Until Turnaround Evidence Emerges


STRONG SELL

Score: 26/100


For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions at current levels. The severe margin compression, deteriorating return ratios, and heavy dependence on other income for profitability indicate fundamental operational challenges that require time to resolve. The stock's consistent underperformance and bearish technical setup suggest further downside risks remain. Wait for clear evidence of sustained margin recovery and core business profitability improvement before considering entry.


For Existing Holders: Consider reducing exposure or exiting positions, particularly for those sitting on losses. The deteriorating financial trend, negative technical momentum, and absence of near-term catalysts suggest limited upside potential. The 26/100 Mojo Score and "STRONG SELL" rating reflect multiple red flags that warrant caution. Only long-term investors with high risk tolerance and confidence in management's turnaround capabilities should consider holding through this challenging period.


Fair Value Estimate: ₹750-800 (12-16% downside risk from current levels), based on deteriorating earnings trajectory, compressed margins, and elevated P/E relative to earnings quality. The current price of ₹897.00 appears vulnerable to further correction until operational improvements materialise.





Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)





⚠️ Investment Disclaimer


This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and all investments carry inherent risks including the potential loss of principal.





{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News