RBZ Jewellers Q3 FY26: Strong Profit Growth Masks Underlying Concerns

22 hours ago
share
Share Via
RBZ Jewellers Ltd., a micro-cap player in the gems and jewellery sector with a market capitalisation of ₹592.00 crores, reported a net profit of ₹17.43 crores for Q3 FY26, declining 6.09% quarter-on-quarter but growing 33.14% year-on-year. The company's stock, trading at ₹152.95 as of February 13, 2026, has underperformed significantly over the past year, declining 25.02% against the Sensex's 8.52% gain, whilst remaining in a mildly bearish technical trend. Despite robust quarterly revenue growth of 56.00% quarter-on-quarter to ₹226.33 crores, the stock faces headwinds from deteriorating margins, weak institutional interest, and a "Does Not Qualify" valuation grade that limits its investment appeal.
RBZ Jewellers Q3 FY26: Strong Profit Growth Masks Underlying Concerns
Net Profit (Q3 FY26)
₹17.43 Cr
▼ 6.09% QoQ
▲ 33.14% YoY
Revenue (Q3 FY26)
₹226.33 Cr
▲ 56.00% QoQ
▲ 16.78% YoY
PAT Margin
7.70%
▼ 508 bps QoQ
Return on Equity
14.68%
Average (5Y)

The Ahmedabad-based jeweller, originally incorporated in 2008 and converted to a public limited company in March 2023, has demonstrated impressive top-line momentum in Q3 FY26, with net sales reaching their highest quarterly level at ₹226.33 crores. However, this revenue surge came at the cost of profitability compression, as PAT margins contracted sharply from 12.79% in Q2 FY26 to 7.70% in Q3 FY26. The company's stock has struggled to gain traction with institutional investors, evidenced by negligible mutual fund holdings (0.00%) and declining foreign institutional investor participation, which dropped from 0.90% in December 2024 to 0.00% by December 2025.

Quarter Net Sales (₹ Cr) QoQ Growth Net Profit (₹ Cr) QoQ Growth PAT Margin
Dec'25 226.33 +56.00% 17.43 -6.09% 7.70%
Sep'25 145.08 +91.96% 18.56 +160.67% 12.79%
Jun'25 75.58 -44.95% 7.12 -16.92% 9.42%
Mar'25 137.29 -29.16% 8.57 -34.53% 6.24%
Dec'24 193.81 +66.22% 13.09 +62.19% 6.75%
Sep'24 116.60 +41.42% 8.07 -11.12% 6.92%
Jun'24 82.45 9.08 11.01%

Financial Performance: Revenue Surge Accompanied by Margin Compression

RBZ Jewellers' Q3 FY26 results present a mixed picture of operational execution. Net sales surged 56.00% quarter-on-quarter to ₹226.33 crores, marking the company's highest quarterly revenue on record. Year-on-year growth stood at a respectable 16.78%, demonstrating sustained demand momentum. However, the headline revenue growth masked significant profitability challenges. Net profit declined 6.09% sequentially to ₹17.43 crores, despite the substantial top-line expansion, indicating deteriorating operational efficiency.

The margin compression story becomes clearer when examining the profitability metrics. PAT margin contracted sharply from 12.79% in Q2 FY26 to 7.70% in Q3 FY26, a decline of 509 basis points. Operating profit margin (excluding other income) also weakened from 19.44% to 13.04%, losing 640 basis points quarter-on-quarter. This margin erosion suggests either aggressive pricing to drive volume growth or rising input costs that the company struggled to pass on to customers. Gross profit margin similarly declined from 17.77% to 10.86%, further confirming the pressure on profitability.

Revenue (Q3 FY26)
₹226.33 Cr
▲ 56.00% QoQ
▲ 16.78% YoY
Net Profit (Q3 FY26)
₹17.43 Cr
▼ 6.09% QoQ
▲ 33.14% YoY
Operating Margin (Excl OI)
13.04%
▼ 640 bps QoQ
PAT Margin
7.70%
▼ 509 bps QoQ

Interest costs nearly doubled quarter-on-quarter, rising from ₹2.55 crores in Q2 FY26 to ₹4.98 crores in Q3 FY26, the highest quarterly interest burden on record. This 95.29% sequential increase suggests either increased working capital borrowings to fund the revenue expansion or rising interest rates on existing debt. Employee costs remained relatively stable at ₹4.21 crores, declining slightly from ₹4.52 crores in the previous quarter, indicating disciplined headcount management.

Operational Challenges: Working Capital Intensity and Debt Dynamics

A deeper examination of RBZ Jewellers' balance sheet reveals structural challenges that constrain profitability. The company's cash flow statement for FY25 shows negative operating cash flow of ₹14.00 crores, driven by working capital changes of ₹66.00 crores. This working capital intensity is characteristic of the jewellery retail business, where inventory holding and credit extended to customers consume significant capital. The company relied on financing cash flows of ₹7.00 crores in FY25 to partially offset the operating cash outflow.

The company's return on equity of 14.68% (five-year average) positions it in the lower tier of profitability amongst peers, though it remains adequate for a capital-intensive retail business. Return on capital employed averaged 15.70% over five years, reflecting moderate capital efficiency. The company's debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 2.26 (average) indicates moderate leverage, whilst the EBIT-to-interest coverage ratio of 6.51 times provides adequate cushion for debt servicing, though the recent spike in interest costs warrants close monitoring.

⚠️ Working Capital Warning

Critical Concern: RBZ Jewellers generated negative operating cash flow of ₹14.00 crores in FY25, with working capital changes consuming ₹66.00 crores. The company's inventory-heavy business model requires continuous capital infusion, limiting free cash flow generation. Interest costs reaching ₹4.98 crores in Q3 FY26 (highest on record) signal potential working capital financing pressure as revenue scales up.

Industry Context: Navigating a Fragmented Jewellery Market

The Indian gems and jewellery sector remains highly fragmented, with organised players like RBZ Jewellers competing against numerous regional and local jewellers. The sector has witnessed consolidation trends in recent years, driven by changing consumer preferences towards branded jewellery, GST compliance advantages for organised players, and increasing acceptance of digital platforms. However, the sector also faces challenges from volatile gold prices, fluctuating consumer sentiment, and intense competition on pricing and designs.

RBZ Jewellers' 16.78% year-on-year revenue growth in Q3 FY26 compares favourably with the broader sector dynamics, suggesting the company is gaining market share or benefiting from regional demand strength. The company's focus on maintaining a stable promoter holding of 75.00% across quarters indicates long-term commitment, whilst the absence of promoter pledging eliminates a key governance risk. However, the near-complete exit of foreign institutional investors from 0.90% in December 2024 to 0.00% by December 2025 raises questions about institutional confidence in the company's growth trajectory.

Peer Comparison: Valuation Discount Despite Operational Similarities

RBZ Jewellers trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of 12.92x (trailing twelve months), representing a significant discount to the sector average of approximately 17x amongst comparable peers. The company's price-to-book ratio of 2.26x also sits below the peer average, suggesting the market assigns lower quality multiples to RBZ Jewellers relative to competitors. This valuation gap persists despite the company's return on equity of 14.68% being broadly in line with peers like Manoj Vaibhav Gems N Jewellers (13.37%) and T B Z Ltd. (9.60%).

Company P/E (TTM) P/BV ROE (%) Debt/Equity Div Yield (%)
RBZ Jewellers 12.92 2.26 14.68 0.55
Asian Star Co. 30.04 0.68 5.42 0.09 0.22
T B Z Ltd. 7.27 1.51 9.60 1.05 1.40
PNGS Gargi FJ 30.26 7.29 23.51 -0.48
Manoj Vaibhav 7.35 1.09 13.37 0.51
Radhika Jeweltec 10.64 2.58 16.15 0.12

The valuation discount likely reflects several factors: RBZ Jewellers' micro-cap status (market capitalisation of ₹592.00 crores) limits liquidity and institutional participation; the company's "Does Not Qualify" valuation grade signals structural concerns about sustainable value creation; and the absence of dividend payments provides no income support for investors. Peers like T B Z Ltd. and Manoj Vaibhav Gems N Jewellers trade at even lower P/E multiples (7.27x and 7.35x respectively), suggesting the broader micro-cap jewellery segment faces valuation headwinds.

Valuation Analysis: "Does Not Qualify" Grade Limits Investment Appeal

RBZ Jewellers carries a "Does Not Qualify" valuation grade, which has persisted since early 2024 with brief interruptions. This grade reflects fundamental concerns about the company's ability to generate sustainable shareholder value at current valuation levels. The company's PEG ratio of 0.16x appears attractive on the surface, suggesting the stock trades at a significant discount to its growth rate. However, this metric must be interpreted cautiously given the volatile quarterly earnings pattern and margin compression trends.

The stock's enterprise value multiples provide additional context: EV/EBITDA of 9.81x and EV/EBIT of 10.25x sit at reasonable levels for a growing jewellery retailer. However, the EV/Sales multiple of 1.38x indicates the market assigns relatively low profitability expectations, consistent with the observed margin pressures. The company's book value per share of ₹61.26 against the current market price of ₹152.95 implies a 2.50x price-to-book multiple, suggesting limited upside unless operational improvements materialise.

P/E Ratio (TTM)
12.92x
vs Sector: 54x
Price to Book
2.26x
Book Value: ₹61.26
EV/EBITDA
9.81x
Moderate Multiple
Valuation Grade
Does Not Qualify
Since Feb'24

Shareholding Pattern: Institutional Exodus Raises Red Flags

The shareholding pattern evolution over the past five quarters reveals concerning trends in institutional confidence. Foreign institutional investor holdings declined steadily from 0.90% in December 2024 to 0.00% by December 2025, representing a complete exit from the stock. Domestic institutional investor holdings similarly contracted from 1.89% to 0.06% over the same period, indicating broad-based institutional selling pressure.

Quarter Promoter % FII % MF % Other DII % Non-Inst %
Dec'25 75.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 24.94
Sep'25 75.00 0.24 0.00 0.08 24.69
Jun'25 75.00 0.50 0.00 0.10 24.40
Mar'25 75.00 0.59 0.00 1.58 22.83
Dec'24 75.00 0.90 0.00 1.89 22.22

Promoter holding remained rock-solid at 75.00% throughout the period, with no pledging of shares, which eliminates governance concerns related to promoter financial stress. The promoter group is led by Rajendrakumar Kantilal Zaveri (38.23%) and Harit Rajendrakumar Zaveri (36.75%), indicating strong family control. Non-institutional holdings increased from 22.22% to 24.94%, suggesting retail investor accumulation even as institutional investors exited. This divergence between institutional and retail investor behaviour warrants caution, as institutional investors typically possess superior research capabilities and risk assessment frameworks.

Stock Performance: Severe Underperformance Across All Timeframes

RBZ Jewellers' stock performance presents a sobering picture of sustained underperformance against both the broader market and its sectoral peers. Over the past year, the stock declined 25.02% whilst the Sensex gained 8.52%, resulting in negative alpha of 33.54 percentage points. This underperformance extends across multiple timeframes: the two-year return of -4.53% compares unfavourably with the Sensex's 15.47% gain, whilst the stock has underperformed its sector by 53.30 percentage points over the past year.

Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week +8.13% -1.14% +9.27%
1 Month +7.37% -1.20% +8.57%
3 Month -1.29% -2.19% +0.90%
6 Month +15.83% +2.59% +13.24%
YTD +9.72% -3.04% +12.76%
1 Year -25.02% +8.52% -33.54%
2 Years -4.53% +15.47% -20.00%

Recent price action shows some stabilisation, with the stock gaining 8.13% over the past week and 7.37% over the past month, outperforming the Sensex which declined during both periods. The stock trades above all key moving averages (5-day, 20-day, 50-day, 100-day, and 200-day), suggesting near-term technical strength. However, the overall technical trend remains "mildly bearish" as of February 3, 2026, with multiple technical indicators showing mixed signals. The stock's beta of 1.09 indicates higher volatility than the broader market, consistent with its micro-cap status and limited liquidity.

Investment Thesis: Positive Financial Trend Offset by Valuation and Technical Weakness

RBZ Jewellers' investment thesis rests on four key pillars: valuation, quality, financial trend, and technical positioning. The company's "Does Not Qualify" valuation grade represents the most significant headwind, signalling fundamental concerns about sustainable value creation at current price levels. The quality assessment of "Average" reflects moderate financial performance, with adequate return ratios but concerning working capital intensity and negative operating cash flows.

Valuation Grade
Does Not Qualify
Quality Grade
Average
Financial Trend (Q3)
Positive
Technical Trend
Mildly Bearish

The financial trend turned "Positive" in Q3 FY26, driven by record net sales of ₹226.33 crores and profit before tax less other income growing 46.60% versus the previous four-quarter average. However, this positive momentum is tempered by the sharp margin compression and rising interest costs. The technical trend of "mildly bearish" reflects the stock's sustained underperformance and weak price momentum over longer timeframes, despite recent stabilisation.

KEY STRENGTHS

  • Strong long-term growth with sales CAGR of 28.10% and EBIT CAGR of 34.42% over five years
  • Record quarterly revenue of ₹226.33 crores in Q3 FY26, demonstrating market share gains
  • Stable promoter holding at 75.00% with zero pledging, ensuring governance stability
  • Adequate interest coverage ratio of 6.51x (average) providing debt servicing cushion
  • Return on equity of 14.68% in line with sector peers
  • Attractive P/E ratio of 12.92x compared to sector average of 54x
  • Operating profit to interest ratio of 11.06x in Q3 FY26 demonstrates operational strength

KEY CONCERNS

  • Severe margin compression with PAT margin declining from 12.79% to 7.70% quarter-on-quarter
  • Negative operating cash flow of ₹14.00 crores in FY25, indicating working capital stress
  • Complete exit of foreign institutional investors from 0.90% to 0.00% over four quarters
  • "Does Not Qualify" valuation grade limiting institutional interest
  • Stock underperformed market by 33.54 percentage points over past year
  • Interest costs doubled to ₹4.98 crores in Q3 FY26, the highest on record
  • Mildly bearish technical trend with sustained price weakness

Outlook: What to Watch in Coming Quarters

The trajectory of RBZ Jewellers over the next few quarters will depend critically on management's ability to restore margin stability whilst sustaining revenue momentum. Investors should monitor several key indicators to assess whether the company can overcome its current challenges and justify a re-rating.

POSITIVE CATALYSTS

  • Margin recovery towards historical levels of 10-12% PAT margin
  • Stabilisation of interest costs below ₹3.00 crores per quarter
  • Positive operating cash flow generation in FY26
  • Return of institutional investor interest (FII/MF buying)
  • Sustained revenue growth above 20% year-on-year

RED FLAGS TO MONITOR

  • Further margin compression below 7% PAT margin
  • Rising debt levels or deteriorating debt-to-equity ratio
  • Continued institutional selling or promoter stake dilution
  • Negative operating cash flows persisting in FY26
  • Revenue growth decelerating below 15% year-on-year
"RBZ Jewellers' impressive revenue trajectory cannot mask the fundamental concerns around margin sustainability, working capital intensity, and institutional investor exodus—factors that collectively justify the current 'Does Not Qualify' valuation grade and limit near-term upside potential."

The Verdict: Avoid Until Operational Improvements Materialise

SELL

Score: 43/100

For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions in RBZ Jewellers at current levels. The combination of "Does Not Qualify" valuation grade, sustained margin compression, negative operating cash flows, and complete institutional investor exit creates an unfavourable risk-reward profile. Wait for concrete evidence of margin recovery, improved cash flow generation, and institutional re-engagement before considering entry.

For Existing Holders: Consider reducing positions on any near-term price strength. Whilst the company demonstrates strong revenue growth momentum, the deteriorating profitability metrics and lack of institutional support suggest limited upside potential. The 25.02% decline over the past year reflects fundamental concerns that are unlikely to resolve quickly. Use any rallies towards ₹165-170 levels as exit opportunities.

Fair Value Estimate: ₹135-140 (11.66% downside from current levels), based on normalised earnings of ₹35-38 crores and a target P/E multiple of 11-12x, reflecting the company's "Average" quality grade and operational challenges.

Note— ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)

⚠️ Investment Disclaimer

This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and all investments carry inherent risks including potential loss of principal.

{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News