Relicab Cable Manufacturing Q4 FY26: Strong Quarter Masks Deeper Structural Concerns

May 30 2026 10:56 PM IST
share
Share Via
Relicab Cable Manufacturing Ltd., a micro-cap player in the electrical equipment sector with a market capitalisation of ₹41.00 crores, delivered its strongest quarterly performance in Q4 FY26, posting net profit of ₹0.75 crores—a remarkable 141.94% surge year-on-year and 141.94% quarter-on-quarter growth. However, the stock's brutal 51.03% decline over the past year and current trading price of ₹39.18 suggests investors remain deeply sceptical about the sustainability of this turnaround.
Relicab Cable Manufacturing Q4 FY26: Strong Quarter Masks Deeper Structural Concerns

The company's Q4 FY26 results showed net sales surging 87.64% sequentially to ₹25.97 crores, marking the highest quarterly revenue in recent history. Despite this impressive top-line expansion, operating margins compressed to 5.20% from 5.71% in the previous quarter, raising questions about profitability sustainability as the company scales operations.

Net Profit (Q4 FY26)
₹0.75 Cr
▲ 141.94% YoY
Revenue (Q4 FY26)
₹25.97 Cr
▲ 63.23% YoY
Operating Margin
5.20%
▼ From 5.71% QoQ
Return on Equity
10.49%
Latest FY

The Daman-based cable manufacturer, which operates from an industrial estate in Nani Daman, has demonstrated volatile quarterly performance over the past two years. The company's revenue trajectory shows significant fluctuations, with sales ranging from a low of ₹6.62 crores in December 2024 to the recent high of ₹25.97 crores in March 2026—nearly a fourfold variation that underscores operational instability.

Quarter Net Sales (₹ Cr) QoQ Change Net Profit (₹ Cr) PAT Margin
Mar'26 25.97 +87.64% 0.75 2.89%
Dec'25 13.84 +1.39% 0.31 2.24%
Sep'25 13.65 +26.98% 0.30 2.20%
Jun'25 10.75 -32.43% 0.54 5.02%
Mar'25 15.91 +140.33% 0.36 2.26%
Dec'24 6.62 -40.47% 0.24 3.63%
Sep'24 11.12 0.81 7.28%

Financial Performance: Revenue Surge Meets Margin Pressure

Relicab Cable's Q4 FY26 revenue of ₹25.97 crores represents a dramatic 87.64% sequential increase and 63.23% year-on-year growth, marking the company's strongest quarterly sales performance on record. The revenue acceleration appears driven by increased order execution, though the company has not disclosed specific contract wins or customer details that would provide visibility into revenue sustainability.

However, the quality of this revenue growth raises concerns. Operating profit before depreciation, interest, tax, and other income (PBDIT excluding OI) stood at ₹1.35 crores, translating to an operating margin of just 5.20%—down from 5.71% in Q3 FY26 and significantly below the 9.95% achieved in June 2025. The margin compression suggests the company is sacrificing profitability for volume growth, a concerning dynamic for a micro-cap enterprise with limited pricing power.

Revenue (Q4 FY26)
₹25.97 Cr
▲ 87.64% QoQ | ▲ 63.23% YoY
Net Profit (Q4 FY26)
₹0.75 Cr
▲ 141.94% QoQ | ▲ 141.94% YoY
Operating Margin (Excl OI)
5.20%
▼ From 5.71% QoQ
PAT Margin
2.89%
▲ From 2.24% QoQ

The profit after tax margin improved to 2.89% in Q4 FY26 from 2.24% in the previous quarter, but remains substantially below the 5.02% achieved in June 2025. Interest costs of ₹0.70 crores consumed a significant portion of operating profit, reflecting the company's debt burden despite relatively modest scale. The tax rate of 18.48% in Q4 FY26 appears reasonable, though the previous quarter saw an unusual negative tax rate of -82.35%, suggesting potential tax adjustments or reversals.

Other income contributed ₹0.40 crores in Q4 FY26, the highest in recent quarters, providing a meaningful boost to overall profitability. Without this other income cushion, the core operating performance would appear even more challenged. The reliance on non-operating income to support bottom-line growth is a red flag for investors seeking sustainable business quality.

Capital Efficiency: Weak Returns Despite Growth Momentum

Relicab Cable's return on equity (ROE) of 10.49% for the latest fiscal year remains below the threshold typically sought by quality-focused investors. For a manufacturing business operating in a capital-intensive sector, this level of return on shareholder capital suggests limited competitive advantages and weak pricing power. The company's average ROE over recent years stands at just 11.41%, indicating persistent challenges in generating attractive returns.

Return on capital employed (ROCE) tells a similar story, with the latest figure at 14.94% and an average of 16.47% over recent periods. Whilst this exceeds the cost of capital, it falls short of the 20%+ returns that characterise truly exceptional businesses. The company's ROCE has actually declined to 16.02% on a half-yearly basis, marking the lowest level in recent periods—a concerning trend that suggests deteriorating capital productivity as the business scales.

Capital Efficiency Concerns

Key Issue: Despite strong revenue growth, Relicab Cable's capital efficiency metrics remain subdued. ROE of 10.49% and ROCE of 14.94% indicate the company struggles to generate superior returns on invested capital. The half-yearly ROCE declining to 16.02% (the lowest in recent periods) suggests scaling challenges that could limit long-term value creation. For a micro-cap manufacturer, these modest returns fail to compensate investors for the elevated business and liquidity risks.

The company's balance sheet reveals shareholder funds of ₹13.57 crores as of March 2025, supported by share capital of ₹10.09 crores and reserves of ₹3.47 crores. Long-term debt stands at ₹6.89 crores, resulting in a debt-to-equity ratio of approximately 0.51—moderate by industry standards but meaningful for a company of this scale. The average debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 3.33 times suggests the company carries approximately three years' worth of EBITDA in debt, which could constrain financial flexibility during downturns.

Working capital management appears strained, with current assets of ₹30.15 crores substantially exceeding current liabilities of ₹16.17 crores. However, trade payables of ₹9.42 crores represent a significant portion of current liabilities, and the debtors turnover ratio declining to 3.69 times on a half-yearly basis (the lowest in recent periods) indicates potential collection challenges. This deterioration in receivables efficiency could pressure cash flows and limit the company's ability to fund growth organically.

The Promoter Pledge Alarm: 99.94% of Shares Encumbered

Perhaps the most alarming aspect of Relicab Cable's corporate governance profile is the extraordinarily high promoter pledge level of 99.94%. This means virtually all promoter holdings—which constitute 27.95% of total equity—are pledged to lenders, typically as collateral for loans. Such extreme pledge levels raise serious red flags about the financial health of the promoter group and their confidence in the business.

High promoter pledging often indicates financial stress, as promoters are forced to leverage their shareholdings to raise funds, potentially for business needs or personal obligations. In adverse scenarios, if the stock price falls below certain thresholds, lenders can invoke the pledge and sell shares in the open market, creating a downward spiral in stock price and further forced selling. For Relicab Cable shareholders, this represents a significant overhang risk that could trigger sudden, sharp price declines.

Critical Governance Red Flag

Extreme Promoter Pledge: With 99.94% of promoter shares pledged, Relicab Cable presents one of the highest pledge ratios in the market. This extreme encumbrance suggests severe financial constraints at the promoter level and creates substantial downside risk for minority shareholders. Any adverse stock price movement could trigger margin calls and forced selling, potentially creating a vicious cycle. Combined with zero institutional holdings, this governance concern should give investors serious pause.

The shareholding pattern shows promoter holdings stable at 27.95% over the past five quarters, with no change in sequential periods. Non-institutional investors hold 72.05% of equity, whilst institutional participation is virtually non-existent—foreign institutional investors (FIIs), mutual funds, and insurance companies collectively hold 0.00%. The absence of institutional investors is telling; sophisticated money managers appear to have avoided this stock entirely, likely due to concerns about scale, governance, volatility, or business quality.

Peer Comparison: Valuation Premium Without Quality Justification

Within the "Other Electrical Equipment" peer group, Relicab Cable trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of 25.87 times, which appears moderate on an absolute basis but elevated relative to the company's quality metrics. The company's ROE of 11.41% exceeds the peer average of approximately 5%, providing some justification for a valuation premium, though this advantage is offset by governance concerns and operational volatility.

Company P/E (TTM) ROE (%) Debt/Equity P/BV
Relicab Cable 25.87 11.41% 0.56 2.71
Cybele Industries 1.39 11.02% 0.13 0.84
Incap 55.04 4.88% 0.08 2.70
Alfa Transformer NA (Loss Making) 8.50% 0.38 1.77
Riddhi Display 7.93 0.0% 0.00 2.37

Relicab Cable's price-to-book value of 2.71 times ranks among the highest in the peer group, exceeded only by Incap at 2.70 times. This valuation multiple suggests the market is pricing in expectations for superior future returns, yet the company's track record of volatile profitability and weak capital efficiency fails to support such optimism. The debt-to-equity ratio of 0.56 sits in the middle of the peer range, neither a particular strength nor weakness.

With a market capitalisation of ₹41.00 crores, Relicab Cable ranks third among its peer group in terms of size. The company's relatively small scale limits operational leverage, negotiating power with suppliers and customers, and access to capital markets. Micro-cap status also means limited analyst coverage, poor liquidity, and heightened vulnerability to business cycle fluctuations—all factors that should theoretically warrant a valuation discount rather than premium.

Valuation Analysis: Attractive Entry Point or Value Trap?

Relicab Cable's current valuation grade stands at "Attractive," having fluctuated between "Expensive," "Fair," and "Attractive" over recent months. The stock trades at ₹39.18, down 59.57% from its 52-week high of ₹96.90 and up 29.52% from its 52-week low of ₹30.25. This dramatic price decline has compressed valuation multiples to levels that appear optically cheap, but the question remains whether this represents genuine value or a deserved de-rating.

At 25.87 times trailing twelve-month earnings, the P/E ratio sits well below the industry average of 48 times, suggesting a significant valuation discount relative to sector peers. The EV/EBITDA multiple of 13.23 times and EV/EBIT of 14.63 times also appear reasonable for a manufacturing business, though these metrics must be interpreted cautiously given the company's volatile earnings profile and compressed margins.

P/E Ratio (TTM)
25.87x
vs Industry: 48x
Price to Book
2.71x
Book Value: ₹13.44
EV/EBITDA
13.23x
Moderate Multiple
Mojo Score
37/100
SELL Rating

The price-to-book ratio of 2.71 times means investors are paying ₹2.71 for every ₹1.00 of book value, a premium that seems difficult to justify given the company's modest ROE of 10.49%. Using the classic DuPont framework, a company earning 10.49% on equity trading at 2.71 times book value implies the market expects substantial improvement in returns—an optimistic assumption given recent trends showing deteriorating capital efficiency.

Enterprise value metrics provide additional perspective. The EV/Sales ratio of 0.87 times suggests the market values the entire enterprise at less than one year's revenue, which could indicate deep value if the business model proves sustainable. However, the EV/Capital Employed ratio of 2.10 times, combined with ROCE of 14.94%, suggests the market is already pricing in returns above the current level—again requiring faith in operational improvement that may not materialise.

Shareholding: Stable but Lacking Institutional Validation

The shareholding pattern for Relicab Cable has remained remarkably stable over the past five quarters, with promoters maintaining a consistent 27.95% stake and non-institutional investors holding 72.05%. This stability could be interpreted positively as demonstrating promoter commitment, though the extremely high pledge level of 99.94% significantly undermines this narrative.

Quarter Promoter % FII % MF % Insurance % Other DII % Non-Inst %
Mar'26 27.95% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 72.05%
Dec'25 27.95% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 72.05%
Sep'25 27.95% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% 72.03%
Jun'25 27.95% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% 72.03%
Mar'25 27.95% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% 72.03%

The complete absence of foreign institutional investors, mutual funds, and insurance companies speaks volumes about the stock's investment appeal amongst professional money managers. Institutional investors typically conduct rigorous due diligence and have access to management, financial models, and industry expertise that retail investors lack. Their collective decision to avoid Relicab Cable entirely suggests fundamental concerns about business quality, governance, or growth sustainability that should give pause to individual investors.

The marginal "Other DII" holding of 0.02% in earlier quarters has now fallen to 0.00%, indicating even this minimal institutional interest has evaporated. The dominant 72.05% non-institutional holding means the stock is primarily held by retail investors, high net worth individuals, or non-institutional entities—a shareholder base that may lack the resources or expertise to effectively monitor management and protect minority interests.

Stock Performance: Brutal Decline Despite Recent Recovery

Relicab Cable's stock performance over the past year tells a story of dramatic value destruction, with the shares plummeting 51.03% whilst the Sensex declined just 8.40%—resulting in negative alpha of 42.63 percentage points. This severe underperformance extends across multiple timeframes, with the stock down 61.59% over two years and 37.81% over three years, even as the broader market posted positive returns.

Period Stock Return Sensex Return Alpha
1 Week +11.59% -0.85% +12.44%
1 Month +3.27% -3.51% +6.78%
3 Months +7.96% -8.01% +15.97%
6 Months -14.08% -12.75% -1.33%
YTD -19.22% -12.26% -6.96%
1 Year -51.03% -8.40% -42.63%
2 Years -61.59% +0.37% -61.96%
3 Years -37.81% +18.98% -56.79%

The recent price action shows some stabilisation, with the stock posting positive returns of 11.59% over one week, 3.27% over one month, and 7.96% over three months. These short-term gains outpaced the Sensex, generating positive alpha and suggesting tentative investor interest following the sharp decline. However, this recent bounce must be viewed in the context of the stock trading 59.57% below its 52-week high of ₹96.90—a level that now appears wildly optimistic in hindsight.

The stock's sector comparison reveals further underperformance, with Relicab Cable down 51.03% over one year whilst the "Other Electrical Equipment" sector gained 14.91%—an underperformance of 65.94 percentage points. This dramatic lag suggests company-specific issues rather than sector headwinds, as peers navigated the same market environment with far better results. The high beta of 1.50 indicates the stock exhibits 50% more volatility than the broader market, amplifying both gains and losses.

From a technical perspective, the stock currently trades in a "Mildly Bearish" trend that began on May 25, 2026, at ₹35.70. The stock sits below all key moving averages—5-day (₹36.57), 20-day (₹36.52), 50-day (₹35.98), 100-day (₹38.23), and 200-day (₹48.59)—a configuration that typically signals sustained downward pressure. Immediate support lies at the 52-week low of ₹30.25, whilst resistance emerges at multiple moving average levels that could cap rallies.

Investment Thesis: Quality Deficit Outweighs Valuation Appeal

The investment case for Relicab Cable rests on four key pillars: valuation, quality, financial trend, and technical trend. The company's proprietary Mojo Score of 37 out of 100 reflects a "SELL" rating, indicating significant concerns across multiple dimensions that outweigh any valuation appeal.

Valuation
Attractive
P/E: 25.87x vs Industry: 48x
Quality Grade
Below Average
Weak fundamentals
Financial Trend
Positive
Q4 FY26 strong
Technical Trend
Mildly Bearish
Below all MAs

Valuation appears "Attractive" on surface metrics, with the stock trading at a significant discount to industry multiples and well below its 52-week high. However, this apparent cheapness must be weighed against "Below Average" quality, which reflects weak capital efficiency, volatile profitability, extreme promoter pledging, and zero institutional ownership. The financial trend is classified as "Positive" based on Q4 FY26's strong results, though sustainability remains questionable given historical volatility. Technical trends remain "Mildly Bearish," with the stock below all moving averages and lacking bullish momentum.

"Relicab Cable's Q4 FY26 results showcase impressive growth, but the company's governance red flags, volatile operating performance, and complete absence of institutional validation suggest this turnaround story carries far more risk than reward for minority shareholders."

Key Strengths & Risk Factors

Key Strengths

  • Strong Q4 FY26 Performance: Net profit of ₹0.75 crores marked the highest quarterly profit in recent history, with revenue surging 87.64% sequentially to ₹25.97 crores.
  • Healthy Long-Term Growth: Five-year sales CAGR of 15.56% and EBIT CAGR of 25.99% demonstrate the company's ability to expand operations over time.
  • Attractive Valuation Metrics: P/E of 25.87x trades at a significant discount to the industry average of 48x, suggesting potential upside if operational improvements prove sustainable.
  • Moderate Leverage: Debt-to-equity ratio of 0.56 and net debt-to-equity of 0.56 remain manageable, providing some financial flexibility.
  • Positive Financial Trend: The company's short-term financial trend is classified as "Positive" based on recent quarterly performance reaching record levels across multiple metrics.

Key Concerns

  • Extreme Promoter Pledging: With 99.94% of promoter shares pledged, the stock faces severe downside risk from potential forced selling if prices decline further.
  • Zero Institutional Ownership: Complete absence of FII, mutual fund, and insurance holdings suggests sophisticated investors have serious concerns about the business.
  • Weak Capital Efficiency: ROE of 10.49% and ROCE of 14.94% indicate poor returns on invested capital, with half-yearly ROCE declining to 16.02% (lowest in recent periods).
  • Volatile Operating Performance: Quarterly revenue ranging from ₹6.62 crores to ₹25.97 crores demonstrates extreme volatility that undermines predictability and planning.
  • Margin Compression: Operating margins declining from 9.95% (Jun'25) to 5.20% (Mar'26) suggest the company is sacrificing profitability for volume growth.
  • Deteriorating Working Capital: Debtors turnover ratio falling to 3.69 times (lowest on record) indicates potential collection challenges and cash flow pressure.
  • Brutal Stock Performance: Down 51.03% over one year and 61.59% over two years, with negative alpha of 42.63% vs Sensex, demonstrating severe value destruction.

Outlook: What to Watch

Positive Catalysts

  • Revenue Sustainability: If Q1 FY27 results maintain revenue levels above ₹20 crores, it would validate the Q4 FY26 performance as a genuine turning point rather than one-time spike.
  • Margin Stabilisation: Operating margins recovering toward 8-10% range would demonstrate improved pricing power and operational efficiency.
  • Promoter Pledge Reduction: Any meaningful reduction in the 99.94% pledge level would significantly improve governance perception and reduce downside risk.
  • Institutional Entry: Even modest buying by mutual funds or FIIs would provide crucial third-party validation of the turnaround story.
  • Working Capital Improvement: Debtors turnover ratio improving above 4.5-5.0 times would indicate better cash conversion and collection efficiency.

Red Flags

  • Revenue Reversion: If Q1 FY27 sales fall back toward the ₹10-15 crore range, it would confirm Q4 FY26 was an aberration rather than sustainable trend.
  • Further Margin Erosion: Operating margins declining below 5% would raise serious questions about business model viability and competitive positioning.
  • Increased Pledging: Any further increase in promoter pledging (though already at 99.94%) or promoter stake sales would signal severe financial distress.
  • Technical Breakdown: Stock breaking below the 52-week low of ₹30.25 could trigger forced selling from pledged shares and create a downward spiral.
  • Debt Increase: Rising debt levels or deteriorating interest coverage below 1.5x would constrain financial flexibility and increase bankruptcy risk.

The Verdict: Avoid Despite Apparent Valuation Appeal

SELL

Score: 37/100

For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions despite attractive valuation metrics. The extreme promoter pledge of 99.94%, complete absence of institutional ownership, volatile operating performance, and weak capital efficiency create a risk-reward profile heavily skewed toward downside. The stock's 51.03% decline over the past year reflects legitimate fundamental concerns rather than temporary market dislocation.

For Existing Holders: Consider using any near-term strength to exit positions or reduce exposure significantly. Whilst Q4 FY26 results appear impressive, the sustainability of this performance remains highly questionable given historical volatility. The governance red flags and technical weakness suggest limited upside and substantial downside risk from current levels.

Fair Value Estimate: ₹32-35 (18.17% to 10.68% downside from current price of ₹39.18). The stock's current "Attractive" valuation grade reflects compression of multiples following severe price decline, but this cheapness appears warranted given quality concerns. Until the company demonstrates consistent profitability, reduces promoter pledging materially, and attracts institutional validation, the stock remains a value trap rather than value opportunity.

Note- ROCE= (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)

⚠️ Investment Disclaimer

This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

{{stockdata.stock.stock_name.value}} Live

{{stockdata.stock.price.value}} {{stockdata.stock.price_difference.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.price_percentage.value}}%)

{{stockdata.stock.date.value}} | BSE+NSE Vol: {{stockdata.index_name}} Vol: {{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol.value}} ({{stockdata.stock.bse_nse_vol_per.value}}%)


Our weekly and monthly stock recommendations are here
Loading...
{{!sm.blur ? sm.comp_name : ''}}
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name }}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank }}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date }}
Entry Price
Target Price
{{sm.target_price }} ({{sm.performance_target }}%)
Holding Duration
{{sm.target_duration }}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
{{sm.comp_name}} price as on {{sm.todays_date}}
{{sm.price_as_on}} ({{sm.performance}}%)
Industry
{{sm.old_ind_name}}
Market Cap
{{sm.mcapsizerank}}
Date of Entry
{{sm.date}}
Entry Price
{{sm.opening_price}}
Last 1 Year Return
{{sm.performance_1y}}%
Related News