The quarter's headline numbers reveal a company grappling with severe operational inefficiencies. Despite a 41.17% sequential revenue increase to ₹32.23 crores—driven by a recovery from the previous quarter's subdued ₹22.83 crores—the company's operating profit excluding other income stood at a meagre ₹0.04 crores, translating to an operating margin of just 0.12%. This represents a dramatic collapse from the 22.26% margin achieved in March 2025, signalling fundamental issues in cost management and operational execution.
The company's reliance on other income to prop up profitability has become increasingly evident. In Q3 FY26, other income of ₹3.29 crores constituted nearly the entirety of the company's operational profit before interest and depreciation. However, even this cushion proved insufficient to offset rising interest costs of ₹2.82 crores—up 25.89% from the previous four-quarter average—and a tax charge of ₹0.93 crores despite the pre-tax loss, resulting in the ₹1.40 crores net loss.
Financial Performance: A Tale of Margin Erosion
The quarterly financial trajectory paints a concerning picture of deteriorating profitability. Revenue in Q3 FY26 at ₹32.23 crores, whilst showing a 41.17% quarter-on-quarter improvement, remains 23.81% below the year-ago level of ₹42.30 crores. More troubling is the year-on-year comparison across the first three quarters of FY26: revenues have declined 23.81%, 15.83% below year-ago levels in Q2, and a steep 57.22% drop in Q1 FY26 compared to the corresponding quarter of FY25.
| Quarter | Revenue (₹ Cr) | QoQ Change | Net Profit (₹ Cr) | QoQ Change | PAT Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec'25 | 32.23 | +41.17% | -1.40 | -433.33% | -4.34% |
| Sep'25 | 22.83 | +2.56% | 0.42 | -26.32% | 1.84% |
| Jun'25 | 22.26 | -65.49% | 0.57 | -93.90% | 2.56% |
| Mar'25 | 64.50 | +52.48% | 9.34 | +4570.00% | 14.48% |
| Dec'24 | 42.30 | +114.61% | 0.20 | -92.59% | 0.47% |
| Sep'24 | 19.71 | -62.12% | 2.70 | -65.99% | 13.70% |
| Jun'24 | 52.03 | — | 7.94 | — | 15.26% |
The margin compression has been severe and sustained. Operating margins excluding other income have plummeted from a healthy 16.70% in June 2024 to effectively zero in the latest quarter. PAT margins followed a similar trajectory, collapsing from 15.26% in June 2024 to negative 4.34% in December 2025. This erosion reflects both pricing pressures and an inability to manage costs effectively in a challenging operating environment.
Employee costs have remained relatively sticky at ₹7.03 crores in Q3 FY26, similar to levels seen in March and December 2024, but now represent a significantly higher proportion of revenues given the top-line contraction. The company's cost structure appears inflexible, unable to adjust proportionately to revenue fluctuations—a characteristic that amplifies losses during downturns.
Quality of Earnings Concern
The company's heavy reliance on other income to support profitability raises questions about earnings sustainability. In Q3 FY26, other income of ₹3.29 crores exceeded the meagre ₹0.04 crores of operating profit, highlighting the weakness in core operational performance. This pattern has persisted across recent quarters, with other income consistently providing the bulk of profitability whilst core operations struggle.
Operational Challenges: Weak Returns and Structural Issues
Revathi Equipment's operational metrics reveal a company struggling to generate adequate returns on capital. The average return on equity (ROE) stands at just 8.19%, significantly below the peer average of approximately 13% and well short of the cost of equity for most investors. This weak ROE, despite the company maintaining a net cash position with negative net debt to equity of -0.20, underscores fundamental issues in capital productivity rather than financial leverage concerns.
The average return on capital employed (ROCE) of 37.06% appears superficially strong, but the latest ROCE has deteriorated sharply to 14.82%, reflecting the recent operational struggles. The disconnect between historical ROCE and current performance suggests either a structural shift in the business environment or temporary operational disruptions that have proven difficult to overcome.
The company's balance sheet, whilst showing minimal debt with long-term borrowings of just ₹2.14 crores as of March 2025, reveals other concerns. Fixed assets increased substantially to ₹38.17 crores from ₹7.93 crores in the previous year, suggesting significant capital expenditure. However, this investment has yet to translate into improved operational performance, raising questions about capital allocation efficiency and the timing of these investments.
Critical Red Flags
Operating Losses: The company posted operating losses (excluding other income) in Q2 and near-zero operating profit in Q3 FY26, indicating core business weakness.
Negative Financial Trend: The company's financial trend is classified as "Negative" with PAT falling 153.2% versus the previous four-quarter average and revenues declining 15.1%.
Earnings Per Share: EPS in Q3 FY26 hit a quarterly low of ₹-4.56, marking the weakest per-share performance in recent quarters.
Industry Context: Underperformance Against Sector
Revathi Equipment operates in the industrial manufacturing sector, which has faced headwinds but has generally held up better than the company's individual performance suggests. Over the past year, the industrial manufacturing sector posted a return of -1.71%, whilst Revathi Equipment's stock plummeted 63.64%—an underperformance of 61.93 percentage points versus its sector peers.
The company's five-year sales growth of -16.00% and five-year EBIT growth of -26.82% highlight a sustained period of contraction, contrasting sharply with the growth trajectories of better-positioned peers in the drilling and precision engineering space. This long-term underperformance raises questions about the company's competitive positioning, market share dynamics, and ability to adapt to changing industry conditions.
The drill manufacturing industry, whilst niche, has seen consolidation and technological advancement. Larger players with greater scale and R&D capabilities have gained market share, potentially squeezing smaller operators like Revathi Equipment. The company's inability to grow revenues over a five-year period suggests either market share losses or exposure to declining end-markets without adequate diversification.
Peer Comparison: Valuation Discount Reflects Fundamental Weakness
A comparison with industrial manufacturing peers reveals Revathi Equipment trading at a significant discount, but this valuation gap appears justified given the company's inferior fundamentals. The company's ROE of 8.19% lags substantially behind peers such as Karbonsteel Engineering (22.48%), Jasch Gauging (18.61%), and GTV Engineering (13.14%).
| Company | P/E (TTM) | P/BV | ROE (%) | Debt/Equity | Div Yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revathi Equipment | 20.92 | 1.71 | 8.19% | -0.20 | — |
| Karbonsteel Eng. | 17.13 | 2.10 | 22.48% | 1.13 | — |
| Prec. Electronic | 334.58 | 19.27 | 2.54% | 4.61 | — |
| GTV Engineering | 17.58 | 4.69 | 13.14% | -0.06 | 0.25% |
| Jasch Gauging | 15.72 | 2.48 | 18.61% | -0.92 | 3.44% |
| Birla Precision | 18.41 | 1.29 | 7.77% | 0.14 | 0.12% |
Revathi Equipment's P/E ratio of 20.92x appears reasonable in absolute terms and sits in the middle of the peer range. However, this multiple is based on trailing earnings that include the strong March 2025 quarter (₹9.34 crores profit). With recent quarters showing losses or minimal profits, the effective forward P/E based on current run-rate earnings would be substantially higher or undefined, making the stock far less attractive than the headline multiple suggests.
The price-to-book ratio of 1.71x is lower than most peers, but again, this discount reflects the market's recognition of the company's weak ROE and deteriorating operational performance. Peers with superior ROE metrics such as Karbonsteel and Jasch Gauging command higher P/BV multiples (2.10x and 2.48x respectively), which is entirely justified given their ability to generate higher returns on shareholder capital.
Valuation Analysis: Attractive Multiples Mask Operational Reality
Revathi Equipment's valuation metrics superficially appear attractive, with the overall valuation grade classified as "Very Attractive." The P/E ratio of 20.92x sits below the industry average of 35x, whilst the EV/EBITDA multiple of 10.87x and EV/Sales of 1.27x appear modest. However, these metrics are backward-looking and fail to capture the sharp deterioration in operational performance over recent quarters.
The company's market capitalisation of ₹206.33 crores values it at just 1.16x trailing twelve-month sales of approximately ₹178 crores (FY25 full-year figure). For a company generating operating losses in its most recent quarters, this valuation—whilst low in absolute terms—may not represent genuine value unless operational performance stabilises and returns to profitability.
The valuation grade history reveals frequent oscillations between "Very Attractive," "Fair," and "Expensive" over the past year, with the most recent shift to "Very Attractive" occurring in February 2025. These rapid changes reflect the stock's volatility and the market's uncertainty about the company's fundamental trajectory. The current "Very Attractive" grade primarily reflects the steep 66% decline from the 52-week high rather than an improvement in underlying fundamentals.
Fair Value Considerations
Estimating fair value for Revathi Equipment is challenging given the operational instability. If the company can return to its historical average PAT margin of approximately 11-12% on stabilised revenues of ₹30-35 crores per quarter, annual earnings could reach ₹12-15 crores. At a conservative 15x P/E multiple (below the current 20.92x to reflect execution risk), this would imply a market capitalisation of ₹180-225 crores, broadly in line with the current ₹206 crores valuation. However, this scenario requires significant operational improvement that is not yet evident.
Shareholding Pattern: Stable Promoter Base, Zero Institutional Interest
The shareholding pattern reveals a stable promoter base holding 63.89% as of December 2025, unchanged from the previous quarter. The Ajai Hari Dalmia Trust holds the largest stake at 46.43%, followed by the Radha Madhav Trust at 13.69% and Hilltop Metals Ltd. at 3.72%. Positively, there is no promoter pledging, eliminating concerns about financial distress at the promoter level.
| Quarter | Promoter % | FII % | MF % | Insurance % | Non-Inst % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec'25 | 63.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 36.11% |
| Sep'25 | 63.89% (↑0.05%) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 36.11% (↓0.04%) |
| Jun'25 | 63.84% | 0.00% (↓0.04%) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 36.15% (↑0.04%) |
| Mar'25 | 63.84% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 36.11% |
However, the complete absence of institutional interest is telling. Foreign institutional investors (FIIs) exited their minimal 0.04% stake by June 2025, whilst mutual funds, insurance companies, and other domestic institutional investors maintain zero holdings. The institutional holding of 0.00% is a significant red flag, suggesting that professional investors see limited value or have concerns about the company's prospects that outweigh the apparently attractive valuation metrics.
The non-institutional shareholding of 36.11% has remained stable, indicating retail investors have neither fled en masse nor accumulated significantly despite the steep price decline. This stability in the face of poor results may reflect a lack of liquidity and trading interest rather than conviction—average daily volumes are extremely low at just 26 shares traded on the most recent day.
Stock Performance: Severe Underperformance Across All Timeframes
Revathi Equipment's stock performance has been dismal across virtually all timeframes, with the severity of underperformance increasing over longer periods. The stock has declined 63.64% over the past year, compared to a 6.86% gain in the Sensex, resulting in a negative alpha of 70.50 percentage points—one of the worst relative performances in the industrial manufacturing sector.
| Period | Stock Return | Sensex Return | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Week | +0.41% | -0.64% | +1.05% |
| 1 Month | -1.80% | -3.44% | +1.64% |
| 3 Month | -24.41% | -3.78% | -20.63% |
| 6 Month | -32.99% | +0.55% | -33.54% |
| YTD | -5.25% | -4.03% | -1.22% |
| 1 Year | -63.64% | +6.86% | -70.50% |
The three-month return of -24.41% and six-month return of -32.99% capture the period during which operational performance deteriorated most sharply. The stock's decline accelerated from October 2025 onwards, coinciding with the shift in technical trend to "Bearish" on November 20, 2025, at ₹785. Since that technical breakdown, the stock has fallen an additional 14.3% to current levels.
The stock's high beta of 1.50 indicates it is significantly more volatile than the broader market, amplifying losses during downturns. Combined with a risk-adjusted return of -1.26 and volatility of 50.59%, Revathi Equipment falls squarely into the "High Risk Low Return" category—the worst possible quadrant for investors. The negative Sharpe ratio confirms that the stock has destroyed value on a risk-adjusted basis.
From a technical perspective, the stock is trading below all major moving averages—5-day (₹669.86), 20-day (₹693.54), 50-day (₹732.03), 100-day (₹854.60), and 200-day (₹897.92)—indicating a strong downtrend across all timeframes. The bearish technical trend, confirmed by negative signals from MACD, moving averages, and KST indicators, suggests continued pressure unless fundamental improvements materialise.
"With operational losses, negative financial trends, bearish technicals, and zero institutional interest, Revathi Equipment presents a challenging investment case despite superficially attractive valuation multiples."
Investment Thesis: Multiple Headwinds Outweigh Valuation Appeal
The investment thesis for Revathi Equipment is undermined by multiple converging headwinds. The company's proprietary Mojo score of just 17 out of 100, with a "Strong Sell" rating, reflects the confluence of negative factors: bearish technical trends, negative financial trends, below-average quality, and operational losses that have persisted despite the company's net cash balance sheet.
The Mojo 4 Dots analysis reveals the challenge: near-term drivers are negative (quarterly financial trend negative, technicals bearish), quality is below average, and whilst valuation appears "Very Attractive," this is largely a function of the severe price decline rather than improving fundamentals. The overall assessment is "Cautious," with the score having deteriorated from "Hold" (50 points) in September 2025 to "Sell" (34 points) in October 2025, and now languishing at "Strong Sell" territory (17 points).
For value investors tempted by the low multiples, the key question is whether current operational challenges represent a temporary cyclical trough or a more structural decline. The five-year negative growth rates in both sales (-16.00%) and EBIT (-26.82%) suggest structural issues rather than mere cyclical weakness. The company's inability to scale, maintain margins, or generate consistent returns on capital raises doubts about its long-term viability in an increasingly competitive industry.
Key Strengths & Risk Factors
Key Strengths
- Net Cash Position: Debt-to-equity of -0.20 indicates the company is a net cash entity with minimal financial leverage risk
- No Promoter Pledging: Zero pledged shares eliminate concerns about forced selling or financial distress at the promoter level
- Stable Promoter Holding: Consistent 63.89% promoter stake suggests long-term commitment to the business
- Historical ROCE: Average ROCE of 37.06% demonstrates the business model can generate strong returns when operating efficiently
- Niche Industry Position: Specialisation in drill manufacturing provides a focused business model with potential for recovery if market conditions improve
Key Concerns
- Operating Losses: Core business generating near-zero or negative operating profit excluding other income in recent quarters
- Revenue Decline: Five-year sales CAGR of -16.00% indicates sustained top-line contraction and potential market share losses
- Margin Collapse: Operating margins have plummeted from 22.26% in Mar'25 to 0.12% in Dec'25
- Weak ROE: Return on equity of 8.19% significantly trails peer average and is below most investors' cost of equity
- Zero Institutional Interest: Complete absence of FII, mutual fund, and insurance holdings signals professional investors see limited value
- Negative Financial Trend: Quarterly PAT down 153.2% versus four-quarter average with revenues declining 15.1%
- High Volatility: Beta of 1.50 and volatility of 50.59% make the stock unsuitable for risk-averse investors
Outlook: What to Watch
Positive Catalysts
- Return to operating profitability (excluding other income) with margins stabilising above 10%
- Sequential revenue growth sustained above ₹35-40 crores per quarter for three consecutive quarters
- Successful cost optimisation initiatives bringing employee costs in line with revenue base
- Institutional investor interest returning with FII or mutual fund accumulation
- Improvement in ROCE from current 14.82% back towards historical average of 37%
Red Flags
- Further quarterly losses or continued operating margin below 5% for two more quarters
- Revenue falling below ₹25 crores per quarter, indicating accelerating business deterioration
- Any increase in debt levels or deterioration in the current net cash position
- Promoter stake reduction or introduction of pledging, signalling loss of confidence
- Technical breakdown below ₹650 support level (52-week low), potentially triggering further selling
The company's near-term outlook hinges on its ability to stabilise operations and return to profitability. The Q4 FY26 results, expected in coming months, will be critical in determining whether Q3's loss represents a nadir or the continuation of a deteriorating trend. Investors should monitor whether the sequential revenue improvement from Q2 to Q3 can be sustained, and more importantly, whether this translates into positive operating profits.
Management commentary on order book visibility, pricing dynamics, and cost control initiatives will be crucial. The industrial manufacturing sector's overall health and demand trends in the mining and construction industries—key end-markets for drilling equipment—will also influence the company's recovery prospects.
The Verdict: Operational Turnaround Required Before Investment Consideration
Score: 17/100
For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating positions. The combination of operational losses, negative financial trends, weak ROE, and zero institutional interest creates a highly unfavourable risk-reward profile. The apparently attractive valuation multiples are backward-looking and do not reflect the current deteriorating operational reality. Wait for at least two consecutive quarters of positive operating profits and stabilising margins before considering entry.
For Existing Holders: Consider exiting positions or significantly reducing exposure. The 63.64% decline over the past year reflects genuine fundamental deterioration rather than temporary market volatility. With the stock trading near 52-week lows and all technical indicators bearish, the path of least resistance remains downward unless operational improvements materialise quickly. The absence of institutional support and continued margin pressure suggest further downside risk.
Fair Value Estimate: ₹550-650 (8-18% downside risk from current levels), assuming no near-term operational improvement. A return to profitability and margin stabilisation could justify current levels, but this requires execution that has not yet been demonstrated.
Note: ROCE = (EBIT - Other Income) / (Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)
⚠️ Investment Disclaimer
This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and all investments carry risk, including the potential loss of principal.
