The company's operating performance deteriorated significantly during the quarter, with operating profit before depreciation, interest, tax, and other income (PBDIT excl OI) plunging to a loss of ₹5.53 crores in Q3 FY26 compared to a profit of ₹1.55 crores in Q2 FY26. This represents an operating margin of negative 13.80%, the weakest performance in recent quarters. The sharp contraction underscores fundamental challenges in the company's core trading and distribution operations.
Financial Performance: Profitability Collapse Despite Revenue Recovery
Riddhi Siddhi Gluco Biols' Q3 FY26 results reveal a troubling disconnect between revenue trends and profitability. Net sales for the quarter stood at ₹40.08 crores, marking a 24.86% sequential increase from Q2 FY26's ₹32.10 crores but declining 9.59% year-on-year from ₹44.33 crores in Q3 FY25. The quarter-on-quarter revenue recovery followed an exceptional Q2 FY26, which saw sales plummet 79.24% sequentially after an extraordinary Q1 FY26 spike to ₹154.61 crores, highlighting extreme volatility in the company's business operations.
| Quarter | Net Sales (₹ Cr) | QoQ Change | Operating Profit (₹ Cr) | Operating Margin | Consolidated PAT (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec'25 (Q3) | 40.08 | +24.86% | -5.53 | -13.80% | -1.59 |
| Sep'25 (Q2) | 32.10 | -79.24% | 1.55 | 4.83% | 13.54 |
| Jun'25 (Q1) | 154.61 | +451.78% | -0.26 | -0.17% | 8.28 |
| Mar'25 (Q4) | 28.02 | -36.79% | -3.44 | -12.28% | 3.63 |
| Dec'24 (Q3) | 44.33 | -9.35% | -0.75 | -1.69% | -36.05 |
| Sep'24 (Q2) | 48.90 | +242.92% | 6.41 | 13.11% | 13.50 |
The company's profitability metrics paint a concerning picture. The consolidated net loss of ₹1.59 crores in Q3 FY26 contrasts sharply with a profit of ₹13.54 crores in Q2 FY26 and a loss of ₹36.05 crores in Q3 FY25. Interest expenses rose 18.29% quarter-on-quarter to ₹4.19 crores, whilst the tax rate surged to an abnormal 84.34% in Q3 FY26 compared to just 6.97% in the previous quarter, further eroding profitability. The PAT margin collapsed to 0.97% from 47.79% in Q2 FY26, reflecting the severe operational stress.
Operational Challenges: Weak Core Business Masked by Other Income
The most alarming aspect of Riddhi Siddhi Gluco Biols' Q3 FY26 performance lies in the complete breakdown of its core operational efficiency. The company reported an operating loss (PBDIT excl OI) of ₹5.53 crores, translating to a negative operating margin of 13.80%. This marks a dramatic deterioration from the positive ₹1.55 crores operating profit and 4.83% margin achieved in Q2 FY26. The company's profit before tax less other income stood at negative ₹10.12 crores, the lowest level in recent quarters, indicating that the core trading and distribution business is fundamentally unprofitable at current operating parameters.
⚠️ Critical Operational Red Flag
Other Income Dependence: Other income of ₹14.29 crores in Q3 FY26 represented a staggering 342.69% of profit before tax (PBT). This extraordinary reliance on non-operating income completely masks the underlying operational losses. Without this cushion from other income—primarily from windmill power generation and investment income—the company would have reported significantly larger losses. This structural weakness raises serious questions about the sustainability of the current business model.
The company's return on equity (ROE) stands at just 4.10% for the latest period, indicating extremely weak capital efficiency. This is substantially below industry standards and reflects the company's inability to generate adequate returns for shareholders. The average ROE over recent years has been a mere 2.59%, highlighting persistent challenges in deploying capital profitably. The average return on capital employed (ROCE) is negative at -1.13%, further underscoring the fundamental operational difficulties facing the business.
Balance sheet quality presents a mixed picture. Shareholder funds stood at ₹1,549.09 crores as of March 2025, with minimal long-term debt providing some financial flexibility. However, the company's debt-to-EBITDA ratio averaged 16.14 times, indicating high leverage relative to operating cash generation capacity. The sales-to-capital-employed ratio of just 0.21 times suggests inefficient asset utilisation, with the company generating minimal revenue relative to its capital base.
Business Model Concerns: Trading Volatility and Structural Profitability Issues
Riddhi Siddhi Gluco Biols operates in the trading and distribution sector, focusing on agriculture and metal commodity trading alongside power generation through windmills. The extreme revenue volatility witnessed across recent quarters—from ₹154.61 crores in Q1 FY26 to ₹32.10 crores in Q2 FY26 and back to ₹40.08 crores in Q3 FY26—reflects the inherently unpredictable nature of commodity trading operations. This volatility makes it exceedingly difficult for investors to forecast earnings or assess the company's sustainable profitability level.
Five-Year Performance: Structural Decline
The company's five-year financial trajectory reveals a troubling pattern of structural decline. Net sales have contracted at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of -14.03% over the past five years, falling from ₹576.00 crores in FY20 to ₹135.00 crores in FY25. This represents a 76.56% decline in revenue scale over the period. Whilst EBIT growth averaged 7.19% annually, this metric is misleading given the company's heavy dependence on other income rather than core operational profitability. The average EBIT-to-interest coverage ratio of -1.18 times indicates that operating earnings have been insufficient to cover interest expenses, a deeply concerning metric for financial sustainability.
The company's quality grade stands at "Below Average," reflecting weak long-term financial performance. Key quality indicators reveal multiple structural concerns: negative average ROCE of -1.13%, weak average ROE of 2.59%, high average debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 16.14 times, and persistently declining sales growth. The only positive quality indicator is the absence of promoter pledging, with zero pledged shares as of the latest reporting period.
Peer Comparison: Valuation Discount Reflects Fundamental Weakness
Comparing Riddhi Siddhi Gluco Biols against its peer group in the trading and distributors sector reveals why the stock trades at a significant valuation discount. The company's financial metrics lag substantially behind industry peers across most parameters, justifying the lower multiples.
| Company | P/E (TTM) | P/BV | ROE (%) | Debt/Equity | Div Yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Riddhi Siddhi Gluco Biols | 5.85 | 0.24 | 2.59 | 0.14 | 0.57 |
| Oswal Agro Mills | 5.41 | 0.71 | 4.14 | -0.18 | — |
| SMT Engineering | 47.76 | 7.26 | 7.25 | 0.84 | — |
| Veritas (India) | 14.28 | 0.18 | 4.90 | 0.08 | 0.03 |
| Kothari Products | 8.78 | 0.36 | 1.33 | 0.00 | — |
| Astal Lab | 33.66 | 7.63 | 8.40 | 0.18 | — |
Riddhi Siddhi Gluco Biols trades at a P/E ratio of 5.85 times, below the peer group average of approximately 22 times (excluding extreme outliers). However, this apparent "value" is misleading given the company's weak ROE of 2.59% compared to the peer average of around 5.00%. The company's price-to-book ratio of 0.24 times is the second-lowest in the peer group, reflecting the market's scepticism about the company's ability to generate adequate returns on its book value. With a market capitalisation of just ₹377.00 crores, Riddhi Siddhi Gluco Biols ranks fifth among its peer group, firmly in micro-cap territory.
Valuation Analysis: Risky Classification Justified by Fundamentals
Riddhi Siddhi Gluco Biols carries a "Risky" valuation classification, a designation that accurately reflects the company's precarious financial position and uncertain earnings trajectory. The stock trades at ₹530.00 as of February 06, 2026, representing a 23.30% decline from its 52-week high of ₹691.00 but a 30.86% premium to its 52-week low of ₹405.00. This positioning in the middle of the annual range suggests the market is struggling to find an appropriate valuation anchor given the company's erratic quarterly performance.
The company's enterprise value metrics present distorted readings due to negative EBIT and EBITDA figures, resulting in negative EV/EBIT of -53.47 times and EV/EBITDA of -208.52 times. These metrics are essentially meaningless for valuation purposes given the company's operational losses. The EV/Sales ratio of 2.33 times appears reasonable on the surface, but this metric fails to capture the fundamental profitability challenges facing the business.
The dividend yield of 0.57% based on the latest dividend of ₹3.00 per share (ex-dividend date September 18, 2025) provides minimal income support. More concerningly, the dividend payout ratio of -17.58% indicates the company paid dividends despite making losses, an unsustainable practice that raises questions about capital allocation discipline.
Shareholding Pattern: Stable but Limited Institutional Interest
The shareholding pattern of Riddhi Siddhi Gluco Biols has remained remarkably stable over recent quarters, with no meaningful changes in ownership structure. This stability, however, reflects a lack of institutional interest rather than confident long-term holding.
| Category | Dec'25 | Sep'25 | Jun'25 | Mar'25 | QoQ Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoter | 74.54% | 74.54% | 74.54% | 74.54% | 0.00% |
| FII | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Mutual Funds | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% |
| Insurance | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Other DII | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Non-Institutional | 25.45% | 25.45% | 25.45% | 25.45% | 0.00% |
Promoter holding stands at 74.54%, with the largest stake held by Creelotex Engineers Pvt Ltd (50.75%) and Ganpatraj Lalchand Chowdhary (17.92%). The high promoter holding provides some governance stability, and positively, there is no promoter pledging. However, institutional holdings are virtually non-existent, with just 0.01% held by mutual funds (only two funds) and zero holdings by FIIs, insurance companies, and other domestic institutional investors. This absence of institutional participation signals a lack of confidence from professional investors who have evidently assessed the company's fundamentals and chosen to avoid the stock.
Stock Performance: Significant Underperformance Across Timeframes
Riddhi Siddhi Gluco Biols' stock performance has been disappointing across most timeframes, with the company significantly underperforming the broader market. The stock has declined 8.67% over the past year whilst the Sensex gained 7.07%, resulting in a negative alpha of -15.74 percentage points. This underperformance accelerates over longer periods, with the stock declining 12.28% over two years compared to the Sensex's 15.78% gain (alpha of -28.06 percentage points).
| Period | Stock Return | Sensex Return | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Week | -2.35% | +1.59% | -3.94% |
| 1 Month | +21.70% | -1.74% | +23.44% |
| 3 Months | +0.04% | +0.32% | -0.28% |
| 6 Months | -1.67% | +3.77% | -5.44% |
| YTD | +26.15% | -1.92% | +28.07% |
| 1 Year | -8.67% | +7.07% | -15.74% |
| 2 Years | -12.28% | +15.78% | -28.06% |
| 3 Years | +55.95% | +38.13% | +17.82% |
| 5 Years | +106.99% | +64.75% | +42.24% |
The stock does show positive returns over longer three-year and five-year periods, with gains of 55.95% and 106.99% respectively, outperforming the Sensex. However, these longer-term gains appear increasingly disconnected from current fundamental realities and may reflect a higher base from earlier periods rather than sustainable value creation. The recent trend is clearly negative, with the stock classified as "Mildly Bearish" technically and having changed to this trend on January 16, 2026, from a previously "Bearish" classification.
The stock exhibits high volatility with a beta of 1.50, indicating it moves 50% more than the broader market. This high beta, combined with negative returns, places the stock in the "High Risk Low Return" category—arguably the worst quadrant for investors. The risk-adjusted return of -0.17 over the past year with volatility of 51.03% underscores the unfavourable risk-reward profile.
Investment Thesis: Multiple Red Flags Warrant Caution
The investment case for Riddhi Siddhi Gluco Biols is severely compromised by multiple structural weaknesses that show little sign of improvement. The company's proprietary Mojo score of just 6 out of 100 places it firmly in "Strong Sell" territory, reflecting a comprehensive assessment across valuation, quality, financial trends, and technical factors.
Key Strengths & Risk Factors
✓ Key Strengths
- Zero Promoter Pledging: No shares pledged by promoters provides some governance comfort
- Stable Promoter Holding: 74.54% promoter stake unchanged over recent quarters
- Diversified Income: Windmill power generation provides alternative revenue stream
- Low Debt Burden: Minimal long-term debt of zero as of March 2025
- Book Value Cushion: Book value per share of ₹2,172.72 provides asset backing
⚠ Key Concerns
- Operational Losses: Negative operating margin of -13.80% in Q3 FY26, core business unprofitable
- Extreme Revenue Volatility: Sales swinging from ₹154.61 crores to ₹32.10 crores to ₹40.08 crores across quarters
- Other Income Dependence: 342.69% of PBT from non-operating income masks operational weakness
- Weak Capital Efficiency: ROE of just 4.10%, ROCE negative at -0.63%
- Structural Revenue Decline: Sales CAGR of -14.03% over five years
- No Institutional Support: Virtually zero FII, mutual fund, or insurance holdings
- High Volatility: Beta of 1.50 with 51.03% volatility creates significant risk
Outlook: Critical Monitoring Points for Any Recovery
For Riddhi Siddhi Gluco Biols to stage a meaningful recovery and warrant reconsideration by investors, several critical improvements would need to materialise. However, the current trajectory suggests these positive developments remain distant possibilities rather than near-term probabilities.
Positive Catalysts to Monitor
- Stabilisation of quarterly revenue above ₹100 crores consistently
- Return to positive operating margins (excl OI) above 5%
- Reduction in other income dependency below 50% of PBT
- ROE improvement above 10% on sustained basis
- Entry of institutional investors signalling confidence
Red Flags Requiring Immediate Action
- Further deterioration in operating margins below -15%
- Continued quarterly losses for two more consecutive quarters
- Any increase in promoter pledging from current zero level
- Debt levels rising significantly from current low base
- Dividend cuts signalling cash flow stress
The Verdict: Exit Recommended on Fundamental Weakness
Score: 6/100
For Fresh Investors: Avoid initiating any position. The company's operational losses, extreme revenue volatility, and dependence on non-operating income create an unfavourable risk-reward profile. With virtually no institutional support and weak capital efficiency metrics, better opportunities exist elsewhere in the market.
For Existing Holders: Consider exiting positions on any technical bounce. The Q3 FY26 results highlight deepening operational challenges with no clear path to sustainable profitability. The negative financial trend, below-average quality grade, and risky valuation classification all point towards further downside risk. Use any strength towards the ₹550-560 levels to reduce exposure.
Fair Value Estimate: ₹420-450 (21% downside from current levels), based on 0.20x P/BV multiple reflecting weak ROE and uncertain earnings trajectory.
Riddhi Siddhi Gluco Biols' Q3 FY26 results underscore fundamental business model challenges that require significant operational restructuring to address. Until the company demonstrates consistent profitability from core operations and reduces its dependence on other income, the investment case remains compromised. The absence of institutional interest, combined with deteriorating financial trends and weak quality metrics, warrants a cautious stance and exit recommendation for risk-averse investors.
Note— ROCE = (EBIT - Other income)/(Capital Employed - Cash - Current Investments)
⚠️ Investment Disclaimer
This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, consider their risk tolerance and investment objectives, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investing in stocks involves risk, including the potential loss of principal.
